搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

用量子蒙特卡罗方法研究二维超流-莫特绝缘体相变点附近的希格斯粒子

陈锟 邓友金

引用本文:
Citation:

用量子蒙特卡罗方法研究二维超流-莫特绝缘体相变点附近的希格斯粒子

陈锟, 邓友金

Higgs mode near superfluid-to-Mott-insulatortransition studied by the quantum Monte Carlo method

Chen Kun, Deng You-Jin
PDF
导出引用
  • 与伽利略不变性的超流体不同, 具有洛伦兹不变性的超流体中除了声子模之外, 还存在希格斯振幅模(Higgs amplitude mode). 在二维情况下, 由于存在十分剧烈的衰变成声子模的过程, 希格斯模是否仍然是一个能产生尖锐线性响应的激发子成为了一个问题. 近年来的进展最终对这一持续数十年的争论做出了肯定的回答, 证实了希格斯的可观测性. 在这里, 我们回顾一系列的数值方面的工作; 它们以二维超流体(superfluid)到莫特绝缘体(Mott insulator) 量子相变点(SF-MI QCP) 附近的具有洛伦兹不变性的超流体为对象, 成功探测到了希格斯模的线性响应信号. 特别是, 我们介绍了一种如何使用平衡态系统的蒙特卡罗算法计算强关联系统的延迟响应函数(retarded response function)的方法. 该方法主要包含两个核心步骤: 即通过路径积分表示下的蠕虫算法这一高效的蒙特卡罗算法计算平衡态系统的虚时间关联函数, 然后利用数值解析延拓方法从虚时间关联函数中获得实时间(实频率)的响应函数. 将该数值方法应用于二维SF-MI QCP附近的玻色-哈伯德模型(Bose-Hubbard Model), 结果表明尽管在超流相中, 希格斯模衰变过程非常剧烈, 但是在动能算符相对应的延迟响应函数的虚部中, 仍然可以观测到希格斯模所对应的尖锐的共振峰. 进一步的研究表明, 在莫特绝缘相, 甚至常流体相中, 也可能存在类似的共振峰信号. 由于可以在光晶格中超冷原子系统等凝聚态中观测到SF-MI QCP, 因此希格斯共振峰有望通过实验进行直接探测. 此外我们指出, 同样的希格斯共振峰还存在于所有和SF-MI QCP具有相同普适类((2+1)维相对论性U(1)临界性)的量子临界系统中.
    In additional to the phonon (massless Goldstone mode) in Galilean invariant superfluid, there is another type of mode known as the Higgs amplitude mode in superfluid with emergent Lorentz invariance. In two dimensions, due to the strong decay into phonons, whether this Higgs mode is a detectable excitation with sharp linear response has been controversial for decades. Recent progress gives a positive answer to this question. Here, we review a series of numerical studies of the linear response of a two-dimensional Lorentz invariant superfluid near the superfluid-Mott insulator quantum critical point (SF-MI QCP). Particularly, we introduce a numerical procedure to unbiasedly calculate the linear response properties of strongly correlated systems. The numerical procedure contains two crucial steps, i.e., one is to use a highly efficient quantum Monte Carlo method, the worm algorithm in the imaginary-time path-integral representation, to calculate the imaginary time correlation functions for the system in equilibrium; and then, the other is, based on the imaginary time correlation functions, to use the numerical analytical continuation method for obtaining the real-time (real-frequency) linear response function. Applying this numerical procedure to the two-dimensional Bose Hubbard model near SF-MI QCP, it is found that despite strong damping, the Higgs boson survives as a prominent resonance peak in the kinetic energy response function. Further investigations also suggest a similar but less prominent resonance peak near SF-MI QCP on the MI side, and even on the normal liquid side. Since SF-MI quantum criticality can be realized by ultracold aotms in optical lattice, the Higgs resonance peak can be directly observed in experiment. In addition, we point out that the same Higgs resonance peak exists in all quantum critical systems with the same universality, namely (2 + 1)-dimensional relativistic U(1) criticality, as SF-MI QCP.
      Corresponding author: Chen Kun, chenkun@mail.ustc.edu.cn;yjdeng@ustc.edu.cn ; Deng You-Jin, chenkun@mail.ustc.edu.cn;yjdeng@ustc.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11275185).
    [1]

    Sachdev S 2011 Quantum Phase Transitions (2nd Ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    [2]

    Goldstone J 1961 Nuovo. Cim. 19 154

    [3]

    Weinberg S 1996 The quantum theory of fields(Vol. 2) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    [4]

    Anderson P W 1963 Phys. Rev 130 439

    [5]

    Higgs P W 1964 Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 508

    [6]

    Pekker D, Varma C M 2015 Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6 269

    [7]

    Sooryakumar R, Klein M V 1980 Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 660

    [8]

    Sooryakumar R, Klein M V 1981 Phys. Rev. B 23 3213

    [9]

    Jaksch D, Bruder C, Cirac J I, Gardiner C W, Zoller P 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 3108

    [10]

    Fisher M P A, Weichman P B, Grinstein G, Fisher D S 1989 Phys. Rev. B 40 546

    [11]

    Capogrosso-Sansone B, Söyler S G, Prokof'ev N V, Svistunov B V 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 015602

    [12]

    Bissbort U, Götze S, Li Y, Heinze J, Krauser J S, Weinberg M, Becker C, Sengstock K, Hofstetter W 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 205303

    [13]

    Regg Ch, Normand B, Matsumoto M, Furrer A, McMorrow D F, Krämer K W, Gdel H U, Gvasaliya S N, Mutka H, Boehm M 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 205701

    [14]

    Chubukov A V, Sachdev S, Ye J 1994 Phys. Rev. B 49 11919

    [15]

    Sachdev S 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 14054

    [16]

    Zwerger W 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 027203

    [17]

    Podolsky D, Auerbach A, Arovas D P 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 174522

    [18]

    Podolsky D, Sachdev S 2012 Phys. Rev. B 86 054508

    [19]

    Katan Y T, Podolsky D 2015 Phys. Rev. B 91 075132

    [20]

    Endres M, Fukuhara T, Pekker D, Cheneau M, Schauß P, Gross C, Demler E, Kuhr S, Bloch I 2012 Nature 487 454

    [21]

    Pollet L, Prokof'ev N 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 010401

    [22]

    Gazit S, Podolsky D, Auerbach A 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 140401

    [23]

    Chen K, Liu L, Deng Y, Pollet L, Prokof'ev N 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 170403

    [24]

    Gazit S, Podolsky D, Auerbach A, Arovas D P 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 235108

    [25]

    Rancon A, Dupuis N 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 180501

    [26]

    Burovski E, Machta J, Prokof'ev N V, Svistunov B V 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 132502

    [27]

    Campostrini M, Hasenbusch M, Pelissetto A, Vicari E 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 144506

    [28]

    Prokof'ev N V, Svistunov B V, Tupitsyn I S 1998 Sov. Phys.-JETP 87 310

    [29]

    Prokof'ev N V, Svistunov B V, Tupitsyn I S 1998 Phys. Lett. A 238 253

    [30]

    Caër L D 2010 Understanding Quantum Phase Transitions (Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis)

    [31]

    Mishchenko A S, Prokof'ev N V, Sakamoto A, Svistunov B V 2000 Phys. Rev. B 62 6317

    [32]

    Silver R N, Sivia D S, Gubernatis J E 1990 Phys. Rev. B 41 2380

    [33]

    Jarrell M, Gubernatis J E 1996 Phys. Rep 269 133

    [34]

    Prokof'ev N V, Svistunov B V 2013 Jetp Lett. 97 649

  • [1]

    Sachdev S 2011 Quantum Phase Transitions (2nd Ed.) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    [2]

    Goldstone J 1961 Nuovo. Cim. 19 154

    [3]

    Weinberg S 1996 The quantum theory of fields(Vol. 2) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

    [4]

    Anderson P W 1963 Phys. Rev 130 439

    [5]

    Higgs P W 1964 Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 508

    [6]

    Pekker D, Varma C M 2015 Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6 269

    [7]

    Sooryakumar R, Klein M V 1980 Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 660

    [8]

    Sooryakumar R, Klein M V 1981 Phys. Rev. B 23 3213

    [9]

    Jaksch D, Bruder C, Cirac J I, Gardiner C W, Zoller P 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 3108

    [10]

    Fisher M P A, Weichman P B, Grinstein G, Fisher D S 1989 Phys. Rev. B 40 546

    [11]

    Capogrosso-Sansone B, Söyler S G, Prokof'ev N V, Svistunov B V 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 015602

    [12]

    Bissbort U, Götze S, Li Y, Heinze J, Krauser J S, Weinberg M, Becker C, Sengstock K, Hofstetter W 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 205303

    [13]

    Regg Ch, Normand B, Matsumoto M, Furrer A, McMorrow D F, Krämer K W, Gdel H U, Gvasaliya S N, Mutka H, Boehm M 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 205701

    [14]

    Chubukov A V, Sachdev S, Ye J 1994 Phys. Rev. B 49 11919

    [15]

    Sachdev S 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 14054

    [16]

    Zwerger W 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 027203

    [17]

    Podolsky D, Auerbach A, Arovas D P 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 174522

    [18]

    Podolsky D, Sachdev S 2012 Phys. Rev. B 86 054508

    [19]

    Katan Y T, Podolsky D 2015 Phys. Rev. B 91 075132

    [20]

    Endres M, Fukuhara T, Pekker D, Cheneau M, Schauß P, Gross C, Demler E, Kuhr S, Bloch I 2012 Nature 487 454

    [21]

    Pollet L, Prokof'ev N 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 010401

    [22]

    Gazit S, Podolsky D, Auerbach A 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 140401

    [23]

    Chen K, Liu L, Deng Y, Pollet L, Prokof'ev N 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 170403

    [24]

    Gazit S, Podolsky D, Auerbach A, Arovas D P 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 235108

    [25]

    Rancon A, Dupuis N 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 180501

    [26]

    Burovski E, Machta J, Prokof'ev N V, Svistunov B V 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 132502

    [27]

    Campostrini M, Hasenbusch M, Pelissetto A, Vicari E 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74 144506

    [28]

    Prokof'ev N V, Svistunov B V, Tupitsyn I S 1998 Sov. Phys.-JETP 87 310

    [29]

    Prokof'ev N V, Svistunov B V, Tupitsyn I S 1998 Phys. Lett. A 238 253

    [30]

    Caër L D 2010 Understanding Quantum Phase Transitions (Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis)

    [31]

    Mishchenko A S, Prokof'ev N V, Sakamoto A, Svistunov B V 2000 Phys. Rev. B 62 6317

    [32]

    Silver R N, Sivia D S, Gubernatis J E 1990 Phys. Rev. B 41 2380

    [33]

    Jarrell M, Gubernatis J E 1996 Phys. Rep 269 133

    [34]

    Prokof'ev N V, Svistunov B V 2013 Jetp Lett. 97 649

  • [1] 赵明慧, 刘忠军, 姬帅, 刘晨, 敖庆波. 超临界氮气在单壁碳纳米管内吸附行为的GCMC模拟研究. 物理学报, 2022, 71(22): 220201. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220765
    [2] 李源, 石爱红, 陈国玉, 顾秉栋. 基于蒙特卡罗方法的4H-SiC(0001)面聚并台阶形貌演化机理. 物理学报, 2019, 68(7): 078101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182067
    [3] 栗苹, 许玉堂. 氧空位迁移造成的氧化物介质层时变击穿的蒙特卡罗模拟. 物理学报, 2017, 66(21): 217701. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.217701
    [4] 孙贤明, 肖赛, 王海华, 万隆, 申晋. 高斯光束在双层云中传输的蒙特卡罗模拟. 物理学报, 2015, 64(18): 184204. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.184204
    [5] 李树, 蓝可, 赖东显, 刘杰. 球形黑腔辐射输运问题的蒙特卡罗模拟. 物理学报, 2015, 64(14): 145203. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.145203
    [6] 李政, 周睿, 郑国庆. 铁基超导体的量子临界行为. 物理学报, 2015, 64(21): 217404. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.217404
    [7] 王晓晗, 郭红霞, 雷志锋, 郭刚, 张科营, 高丽娟, 张战刚. 基于蒙特卡洛和器件仿真的单粒子翻转计算方法. 物理学报, 2014, 63(19): 196102. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.196102
    [8] 石磊, 钱沐杨, 肖坤祥, 黎明. 低气压条件下氢气潘宁放电的模拟分析. 物理学报, 2013, 62(17): 175205. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.175205
    [9] 谢朝, 邹炼, 侯氢, 郑霞. 质子束治疗中非均匀组织的等效水厚度修正研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(6): 068701. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.068701
    [10] 戴春娟, 刘希琴, 刘子利, 刘伯路. 铝基碳化硼材料中子屏蔽性能的蒙特卡罗模拟. 物理学报, 2013, 62(15): 152801. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.152801
    [11] 李刚, 邓力, 黄则尧, 李树. 非定常辐射输运问题的蒙特卡罗自适应偏倚抽样. 物理学报, 2011, 60(2): 022401. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.022401
    [12] 白璐, 汤双庆, 吴振森, 谢品华, 汪世美. 紫外波段多分散系气溶胶散射相函数随机抽样方法研究. 物理学报, 2010, 59(3): 1749-1755. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.1749
    [13] 鞠志萍, 曹午飞, 刘小伟. 蒙特卡罗模拟单阻止柱双散射体质子束流扩展方法. 物理学报, 2010, 59(1): 199-202. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.199
    [14] 蔡明辉, 韩建伟, 李小银, 李宏伟, 张振力. 临近空间大气中子环境的仿真研究. 物理学报, 2009, 58(9): 6659-6664. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.6659
    [15] 付方正, 李明. 蒙特卡罗法计算无序激光器的阈值. 物理学报, 2009, 58(9): 6258-6263. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.6258
    [16] 郑飞腾, 杨中海, 金晓林. 空心阴极类火花放电初始电离过程的PIC/MCC模拟. 物理学报, 2008, 57(2): 990-995. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.990
    [17] 郭宝增, 宫 娜, 师建英, 王志宇. 纤锌矿相GaN空穴输运特性的Monte Carlo模拟研究. 物理学报, 2006, 55(5): 2470-2475. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.2470
    [18] 陈法新, 郑 坚, 杨建伦. 中子厚针孔成像数值模拟研究. 物理学报, 2006, 55(11): 5947-5952. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.5947
    [19] 金晓林, 杨中海. 电子回旋共振放电的电离特性PIC/MCC模拟(Ⅱ)——数值模拟与结果讨论. 物理学报, 2006, 55(11): 5935-5941. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.5935
    [20] 金晓林, 杨中海. 电子回旋共振放电的电离特性PIC/MCC模拟(Ⅰ)——物理模型与理论方法. 物理学报, 2006, 55(11): 5930-5934. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.5930
计量
  • 文章访问数:  6071
  • PDF下载量:  624
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-08-17
  • 修回日期:  2015-09-11
  • 刊出日期:  2015-09-05

/

返回文章
返回