搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

超声分子束注入密度和宽度对托克马克装置加料深度的影响

吴雪科 孙小琴 刘殷学 李会东 周雨林 王占辉 冯灏

引用本文:
Citation:

超声分子束注入密度和宽度对托克马克装置加料深度的影响

吴雪科, 孙小琴, 刘殷学, 李会东, 周雨林, 王占辉, 冯灏

Effects of width and density of supersonic molecule beam on penetration depth of tokamak

Wu Xue-Ke, Sun Xiao-Qin, Liu Yin-Xue, Li Hui-Dong, Zhou Yu-Lin, Wang Zhan-Hui, Feng Hao
PDF
导出引用
  • 基于HL-2A托卡马克装置的真实磁场位形,应用大型边缘等离子体湍流模拟程序BOUT++中的子程序模块trans-neut对不同的超声分子束注入(SMBI)密度和宽度进行模拟.在SMBI过程中,保持单位时间内分子注入个数和注入速度恒定,在恒定通量情况下,通过调整注入分子束密度和宽度来研究SMBI注入深度的变化.研究结果表明:在注入密度较小、注入宽度较大时,SMBI的注入深度更深,分子和原子的分解率和电离率的时空区域较宽.分子分解局域化会抑制全局分解率的增长,而分解局域化又会引发局域分解率的加速增长,进而促进全局分解率的增长,促进效果占优导致在注入速度一定的情况下,恒定通量的分子注入发散角越小,分子注入深度越浅.
    The penetration depth and the fueling efficiency of the supersonic molecular beam injection (SMBI) are affected by both the intrinsic parameters of the SMBI and the parameters of background plasma. The purpose of the present paper is to explore the possible methods of improving the fueling efficiency of SMBI by varying the beam parameters. The penetration depths and the transport processes of SMBI with different beam densities and different beam widths are studied using the trans-neut module of the three-dimensional (3D) edge turbulence simulation code BOUT++. In our present study, the number of the injected molecules per unit time the injection speed and the injected flux are kept constant throughout the SMB fueling process, but the beam density and beam width are adjusted. The simulation is based on the real magnetic configuration of the HL-2A tokamak. Our results indicate that the deeper injection depth can be obtained with a supersonic molecular beam (SMB) with smaller density and larger width. However, the injection depth decreases when the beam density or the beam width increases. The residence time of the beam front can be lengthened by increasing the beam density and widening the beam width. If the beam density increases or the beam width enlarges, not only the injection depth decreases, but also the residence time shortens. The front of the atom density exhibits the behaviors analogous to that of the SMB, namely, both its depth and its residence time decreases with beam density increasing and beam width decreasing. At the same time, the dissociation rate has a larger range in the spatiotemporal coordinate. The global growth of dissociation rate is inhibited by the molecular dissociation localization. However, the localization of the molecular dissociation accelerates the local growth of the dissociation rate, and the global growth of the molecular dissociation rate is promoted. When the promoting effect is dominant, under the condition of constant flux and fixed injection speed, the smaller molecular injection width will lead to the shallower molecular penetration depth. The simulation results suggest that if we attempt to promote the fueling efficiency and to increase the injection depth of SMBI, we should utilize the SMBI with a smaller density and larger beam width. Of course, the concrete influences of the SMBI on injection depth and fueling efficiency should be studied further by varying other relevant parameters of the SMB and the backgroud plasma.
      通信作者: 李会东, huidongli@mail.xhu.edu.cn;zhwang@swip.ac.cn ; 王占辉, huidongli@mail.xhu.edu.cn;zhwang@swip.ac.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金青年基金(批准号:11605143)、国家自然科学基金(批准号:11575055)、中国磁约束聚变科学项目(批准号:2013GB107001)、中国ITER项目(批准号:2014GB113000)和西华大学高性能科学计算重点实验室开放课题(批准号:szjj2017-011,szjj2017-012)资助的课题.
      Corresponding author: Li Hui-Dong, huidongli@mail.xhu.edu.cn;zhwang@swip.ac.cn ; Wang Zhan-Hui, huidongli@mail.xhu.edu.cn;zhwang@swip.ac.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Fund for Young Scientists of China (Grant No. 11605143), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11575055), the National ITER Program of China (Contract No. 2014GB113000), China National Magnetic Confinement Fusion Science Program (Grant No. 2013GB107001), and the Open Research Subject of Key Laboratory of Advanced Computation in Xihua University, China (Grant Nos. szjj2017-011, szjj2017-012).
    [1]

    Sajjad S, Gao X, Ling B, Bhatti S H, Ang T 2009 Phys. Lett. A 373 1133

    [2]

    Baylor L R, Jernigan T C, Combs S K, Houlberg W A, Owen L W, Rasmussen D A, Maruyama S, Parks P B 2000 Phys. Plasmas 7 1878

    [3]

    Yao L H, Zhao D W, Feng B B, Chen C Y, Zhou Y, Han X Y, Li Y G, Jerome B, Duan X R 2010 Plasma Sci. Technol. 12 529

    [4]

    Yu D L, Chen C Y, Yao L H, Dong J Q, Feng B B, Zhou Y, Shi Z B, Zhou J, Han X Y, Zhong W L, Cui C H, Huang Y, Cao Z, Liu Y, Yan L W, Yang Q W, Duan X R, Liu Y 2012 Nucl. Fusion 52 082001

    [5]

    Xiao W W, Diamond P H, Zou X L, Dong J Q, Ding X T, Yao L H, Feng B B, Chen C Y, Zhong W L, Xu M 2012 Nucl. Fusion 52 114027

    [6]

    Ma Q, Yu D L, Chen C Y, Wei Y L, Zhong W L, Zou X L, Zuo H Y, Du J L, Liu L, Dong C F, Shi Z B, Zhao K J, Feng B B, Zhou Y, Wang Z H, Xu M, Liu Y, Yan L W, Yang Q W, Yao L H, Ding X T, Dong J Q, Duan X R, Liu Y, HL-2A Team 2016 Nucl. Fusion 56 126008

    [7]

    Huang D W, Chen Z Y, Tong R H, Yan W, Wang S Y, Wei Y N, Ma T K, Dai A J, Wang X L, Jiang Z H, Yang Z J, Zhuang G, Pan Y, J-TEXT Team 2017 Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion 59 085002

    [8]

    Sun H J, Ding X T, Yao L H, Feng B B, Liu Z T, Duan X R, Yang Q W 2010 Plasma Phys. Contr. F. 52 045003

    [9]

    Braams B J 1996 Contrib. Plasma Phys. 36 276

    [10]

    Vold E L, Najmabadi F, Conn R W 1992 Nucl. Fusion 32 1433

    [11]

    Rognlien T D, Braams B J, Knoll D A 1996 Contrib. Plasma Phys. 36 105

    [12]

    Rognlien T D, Ryutov D D, Mattor N, Porter G D 1999 Phys. Plasmas 6 1851

    [13]

    Dudson B D, Umansky M V, Xu X Q, Snyder P B, Wilson H R 2009 Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 1467

    [14]

    Xu X Q, Umansky M V, Dudson B, Snyder R B 2008 Commun. Comput. Phys. 4 949

    [15]

    Umansky M V, Xu X Q, Dudson B, Lodestro L L, Myra J R 2009 Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 887

    [16]

    Landman I S, Janeschitz G 2007 J. Nucl. Mater. 363 1061

    [17]

    Wang Z H, Xu X Q, Xia T Y, Rognlien T D 2014 Nucl. Fusion 54 043019

    [18]

    Wang Y H, Guo W F, Wang Z H, Ren Q L, Sun A P, Xu M, Wang A K, Xiang N 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 106601

    [19]

    Zhou Y L, Wang Z H, Xu X Q, Li H D, Feng H, Sun W G 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 012503

    [20]

    Zhou Y L, Wang Z H, Xu M, Wang Q, Nie L, Feng H, Sun W G 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 095201

    [21]

    Wu X K, Li H D, Wang Z H, Feng H, Zhou Y L 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 065201

    [22]

    Shi Y F, Wang Z H, Ren Q L, Sun A P, Yu D L, Guo W F, Xu M 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 055201

  • [1]

    Sajjad S, Gao X, Ling B, Bhatti S H, Ang T 2009 Phys. Lett. A 373 1133

    [2]

    Baylor L R, Jernigan T C, Combs S K, Houlberg W A, Owen L W, Rasmussen D A, Maruyama S, Parks P B 2000 Phys. Plasmas 7 1878

    [3]

    Yao L H, Zhao D W, Feng B B, Chen C Y, Zhou Y, Han X Y, Li Y G, Jerome B, Duan X R 2010 Plasma Sci. Technol. 12 529

    [4]

    Yu D L, Chen C Y, Yao L H, Dong J Q, Feng B B, Zhou Y, Shi Z B, Zhou J, Han X Y, Zhong W L, Cui C H, Huang Y, Cao Z, Liu Y, Yan L W, Yang Q W, Duan X R, Liu Y 2012 Nucl. Fusion 52 082001

    [5]

    Xiao W W, Diamond P H, Zou X L, Dong J Q, Ding X T, Yao L H, Feng B B, Chen C Y, Zhong W L, Xu M 2012 Nucl. Fusion 52 114027

    [6]

    Ma Q, Yu D L, Chen C Y, Wei Y L, Zhong W L, Zou X L, Zuo H Y, Du J L, Liu L, Dong C F, Shi Z B, Zhao K J, Feng B B, Zhou Y, Wang Z H, Xu M, Liu Y, Yan L W, Yang Q W, Yao L H, Ding X T, Dong J Q, Duan X R, Liu Y, HL-2A Team 2016 Nucl. Fusion 56 126008

    [7]

    Huang D W, Chen Z Y, Tong R H, Yan W, Wang S Y, Wei Y N, Ma T K, Dai A J, Wang X L, Jiang Z H, Yang Z J, Zhuang G, Pan Y, J-TEXT Team 2017 Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion 59 085002

    [8]

    Sun H J, Ding X T, Yao L H, Feng B B, Liu Z T, Duan X R, Yang Q W 2010 Plasma Phys. Contr. F. 52 045003

    [9]

    Braams B J 1996 Contrib. Plasma Phys. 36 276

    [10]

    Vold E L, Najmabadi F, Conn R W 1992 Nucl. Fusion 32 1433

    [11]

    Rognlien T D, Braams B J, Knoll D A 1996 Contrib. Plasma Phys. 36 105

    [12]

    Rognlien T D, Ryutov D D, Mattor N, Porter G D 1999 Phys. Plasmas 6 1851

    [13]

    Dudson B D, Umansky M V, Xu X Q, Snyder P B, Wilson H R 2009 Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 1467

    [14]

    Xu X Q, Umansky M V, Dudson B, Snyder R B 2008 Commun. Comput. Phys. 4 949

    [15]

    Umansky M V, Xu X Q, Dudson B, Lodestro L L, Myra J R 2009 Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 887

    [16]

    Landman I S, Janeschitz G 2007 J. Nucl. Mater. 363 1061

    [17]

    Wang Z H, Xu X Q, Xia T Y, Rognlien T D 2014 Nucl. Fusion 54 043019

    [18]

    Wang Y H, Guo W F, Wang Z H, Ren Q L, Sun A P, Xu M, Wang A K, Xiang N 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 106601

    [19]

    Zhou Y L, Wang Z H, Xu X Q, Li H D, Feng H, Sun W G 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 012503

    [20]

    Zhou Y L, Wang Z H, Xu M, Wang Q, Nie L, Feng H, Sun W G 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 095201

    [21]

    Wu X K, Li H D, Wang Z H, Feng H, Zhou Y L 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 065201

    [22]

    Shi Y F, Wang Z H, Ren Q L, Sun A P, Yu D L, Guo W F, Xu M 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 055201

  • [1] 刘冠男, 李新霞, 刘洪波, 孙爱萍. HL-2M托卡马克装置中螺旋波与低杂波的协同电流驱动. 物理学报, 2023, 72(24): 245202. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231077
    [2] 沈勇, 董家齐, 何宏达, 潘卫, 郝广周. 托卡马克理想导体壁与磁流体不稳定性. 物理学报, 2023, 72(3): 035203. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222043
    [3] 王福琼, 徐颖峰, 查学军, 钟方川. 托卡马克边界等离子体中钨杂质输运的多流体及动力学模拟. 物理学报, 2023, 72(21): 215213. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230991
    [4] 刘朝阳, 章扬忠, 谢涛, 刘阿娣, 周楚. 托卡马克无碰撞捕获电子模在时空表象中的群速度. 物理学报, 2021, 70(11): 115203. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20202003
    [5] 殷娇, 肖国梁, 陈程远, 冯北滨, 张轶泼, 钟武律. 用于超声分子束束流特性测试的纹影系统研制及应用. 物理学报, 2020, 69(21): 215202. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201383
    [6] 张重阳, 刘阿娣, 李弘, 陈志鹏, 李斌, 杨州军, 周楚, 谢锦林, 兰涛, 刘万东, 庄革, 俞昌旋. 双极化频率调制微波反射计在J-TEXT托卡马克上的应用. 物理学报, 2014, 63(12): 125204. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.125204
    [7] 杜海龙, 桑超峰, 王亮, 孙继忠, 刘少承, 汪惠乾, 张凌, 郭后扬, 王德真. 东方超环托卡马克高约束模式边界等离子体输运数值模拟研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(24): 245206. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.245206
    [8] 冯北滨, 姚良骅, 陈程远, 季小全, 钟武律, 石中兵, 余德良, 崔正英, 宋显明, 段旭如. HL-2A装置上超声分子束注入触发L-H转换的实验研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(1): 015203. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.015203
    [9] 洪斌斌, 陈少永, 唐昌建, 张新军, 胡有俊. 托卡马克中电子回旋波与低杂波协同驱动的物理研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(11): 115207. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.115207
    [10] 卢洪伟, 查学军, 胡立群, 林士耀, 周瑞杰, 罗家融, 钟方川. HT-7托卡马克slide-away放电充气对等离子体行为的影响. 物理学报, 2012, 61(7): 075202. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.075202
    [11] 卢洪伟, 胡立群, 林士耀, 钟国强, 周瑞杰, 张继宗. HT-7托卡马克等离子体slide-away放电研究. 物理学报, 2010, 59(8): 5596-5601. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.5596
    [12] 徐强, 高翔, 单家方, 胡立群, 赵君煜. HT-7托卡马克大功率低混杂波电流驱动的实验研究. 物理学报, 2009, 58(12): 8448-8453. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.8448
    [13] 姚良骅, 冯北滨, 陈程远, 冯 震, 李 伟, 焦一鸣. 中国环流器二号A(HL-2A)超声分子束注入最新结果. 物理学报, 2008, 57(7): 4159-4165. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.4159
    [14] 石中兵, 姚良骅, 丁玄同, 段旭如, 冯北滨, 刘泽田, 肖维文, 孙红娟, 李 旭, 李 伟, 陈程远, 焦一鸣. HL-2A托卡马克超声分子束注入深度和加料效果研究. 物理学报, 2007, 56(8): 4771-4777. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.4771
    [15] 黄勤超, 罗家融, 王华忠, 李 翀. EAST装置等离子体放电位形快速识别研究. 物理学报, 2006, 55(1): 281-286. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.281
    [16] 龚学余, 彭晓炜, 谢安平, 刘文艳. 托卡马克等离子体不同运行模式下的电子回旋波电流驱动. 物理学报, 2006, 55(3): 1307-1314. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.1307
    [17] 徐 伟, 万宝年, 谢纪康. HT-6M托卡马克装置杂质输运. 物理学报, 2003, 52(8): 1970-1978. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.1970
    [18] 姚良骅, 冯北滨, 冯震, 董贾福, 郦文忠, 徐德明, 洪文玉. HL-1M装置高气压超声分子束加料效果. 物理学报, 2002, 51(3): 596-602. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.596
    [19] 王文浩, 俞昌旋, 许宇鸿, 闻一之, 凌必利, 宋梅, 万宝年. HT-7超导托卡马克边界等离子体参量及其涨落的实验研究. 物理学报, 2001, 50(8): 1521-1527. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.1521
    [20] 张先梅, 万宝年, 阮怀林, 吴振伟. HT-7托卡马克等离子体欧姆放电时电子热扩散系数的研究. 物理学报, 2001, 50(4): 715-720. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.715
计量
  • 文章访问数:  5029
  • PDF下载量:  128
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2017-03-20
  • 修回日期:  2017-06-18
  • 刊出日期:  2017-10-05

/

返回文章
返回