-
We use the data obtained from empirical forecast model and satellite remote sensing to analyze and assess the accuracy of the data obtained from first near space meteorological rocket sounding in Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center (JSLC) in November 2004. Analysis shows that the data of empirical forecast model has great difference from meteorological rocket sounding data for the middle-upper stratosphere. Because the empirical forecast model has low spatial and temporal resolution, especially it lacks of the sounding data for the middle-upper stratosphere in China, the deviation between the data of meteorological rocket and the satellite data is obviouslly lower than the empirical forecast model gave. The deviation is caused by the systematic error between the two and the difference of time, latitude and longitude. Comprehensive comparison results show that the data of meteorological rocket is of high accuracy and credibility compared to the data of the empirical forecast model and satellite remote sensing. These data can be used to specify the probe’s results from other ways.
-
Keywords:
- near space /
- meteorological rocket /
- empirical forecast model /
- accuracy assessment
[1] Ling C, Chen Z Y, Chen H B 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 249201 (in Chinese) [凌超, 陈泽宇, 陈洪滨 2012 物理学报 61 249201]
[2] Wu Z, Chen Z Y, Peng Y G, Chen H B,Wang Z H, Lu D R 2008 Chinese J. Geophys 51 44 (in Chinese) [吴振, 陈泽宇, 彭勇刚, 陈洪滨, 王振会, 吕达仁 2008 地球物理学报 51 44]
[3] Sheng Z 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 219401 (in Chinese) [盛峥 2012 物理学报 61 219401]
[4] Sheng Z 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 029302
[5] Drob D P, Emmert J T, Growley G, Picone J M, Shepherd G G, Skinner W, Hays P, Niciejewski R J, Larsen M, She C Y, Meriwether J W, Hernandez G, Jarvis M J, Sipler D P, Tepley C A, O’Brien M S, Bowman J R, Wu Q, Murayama Y, Kawamura S, Reid I M, Vincent R A 2008 J. Geophys. Res. 113 A12304
[6] Picone J M, Hedin A E, Drob D P 2002 J. Geophys. Res. 107 (A12)1468
[7] Sheng Z, Fang H X 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 029301
[8] Jiang Y, Sheng Z, Shi H Q 2013 J. Atmos. Sol-Terr. Phy. 98 31
[9] Guo P, Kuo Y H, Sokolovskiy S V, Lenschow D H 2011 J. Atmos. Sci. 68 1703
[10] Guo P, Xu X, Zhang G X 2011 J. Atmos. Sol-Terr. Phy. 73 839
[11] Wang Z H, Wang Z, Kang S F, Zhang Y S, He X J 2010 Chinese Journal of Radio Science 25 913 (in Chinese) [王振会, 王喆, 康士峰, 张玉生, 赫晓静 2010 电波科学学报 25 913]
[12] Wei M, Ouyang S C 2011 Engineering Sciences 13 49 (in Chinese) [魏鸣, 欧阳首承 2011 中国工程科学 13 49]
-
[1] Ling C, Chen Z Y, Chen H B 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 249201 (in Chinese) [凌超, 陈泽宇, 陈洪滨 2012 物理学报 61 249201]
[2] Wu Z, Chen Z Y, Peng Y G, Chen H B,Wang Z H, Lu D R 2008 Chinese J. Geophys 51 44 (in Chinese) [吴振, 陈泽宇, 彭勇刚, 陈洪滨, 王振会, 吕达仁 2008 地球物理学报 51 44]
[3] Sheng Z 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 219401 (in Chinese) [盛峥 2012 物理学报 61 219401]
[4] Sheng Z 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 029302
[5] Drob D P, Emmert J T, Growley G, Picone J M, Shepherd G G, Skinner W, Hays P, Niciejewski R J, Larsen M, She C Y, Meriwether J W, Hernandez G, Jarvis M J, Sipler D P, Tepley C A, O’Brien M S, Bowman J R, Wu Q, Murayama Y, Kawamura S, Reid I M, Vincent R A 2008 J. Geophys. Res. 113 A12304
[6] Picone J M, Hedin A E, Drob D P 2002 J. Geophys. Res. 107 (A12)1468
[7] Sheng Z, Fang H X 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 029301
[8] Jiang Y, Sheng Z, Shi H Q 2013 J. Atmos. Sol-Terr. Phy. 98 31
[9] Guo P, Kuo Y H, Sokolovskiy S V, Lenschow D H 2011 J. Atmos. Sci. 68 1703
[10] Guo P, Xu X, Zhang G X 2011 J. Atmos. Sol-Terr. Phy. 73 839
[11] Wang Z H, Wang Z, Kang S F, Zhang Y S, He X J 2010 Chinese Journal of Radio Science 25 913 (in Chinese) [王振会, 王喆, 康士峰, 张玉生, 赫晓静 2010 电波科学学报 25 913]
[12] Wei M, Ouyang S C 2011 Engineering Sciences 13 49 (in Chinese) [魏鸣, 欧阳首承 2011 中国工程科学 13 49]
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 4867
- PDF Downloads: 495
- Cited By: 0
下载:
