紧聚焦飞秒脉冲与石英玻璃相互作用过程中的电子动量弛豫时间研究

卞华栋; 戴晔; 叶俊毅; 宋娟; 阎晓娜; 马国宏

doi:10.7498/aps.63.074209

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名

邮箱

手机号码

标题

留言内容

验证码

摘要

本文通过数值模拟（3+1）维扩展的广义非线性薛定谔方程，研究了紧聚焦飞秒激光脉冲在诱导石英玻璃的非线性电离过程中电子动量弛豫时间对于该电离过程的影响. 计算结果证明电子动量弛豫时间会直接影响入射脉冲在焦点区域所形成的峰值场强、自由电子态密度和能流等参量的分布态势，因此在与实验结果相比较后发现适合于相互作用过程的电子动量弛豫时间的理论值约为1.27 fs. 进一步的研究表明，电子动量弛豫时间与逆韧致吸收效应、雪崩电离的概率、等离子体密度、等离子体的自散焦效果以及间接引起的焦平面位置的移动都有着密切的联系. 当前的研究结果表明电子动量弛豫时间在飞秒激光脉冲与物质相互作用的过程中发挥着重要作用.

关键词:

作者及机构信息

1.
上海大学物理系, 上海 200444;

2.
江苏大学材料科学与工程学院, 镇江 212013

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（批准号：60908007，11174159，61205128）和上海市自然科学基金（批准号：13ZR1414800）资助的课题.

参考文献

[1]	Gattass R R, Mazur E 2008 Nature Photon. 2 219
[2]	Poumellec B, Lancry M, Chahid-Erraji A, Kazansky P G 2011 Opt. Mater. Express 1 766
[3]	He F, Cheng Y 2007 Chin. J. Lasers 34 595 (in Chinese)[何飞, 程亚2007 中国激光34 595]
[4]	Peng N N, Huo Y Y, Zhou K, Jia X, Pan J, Sun Z R, Jia T Q 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 094201 (in Chinese)[彭娜娜, 霍燕燕, 周侃, 贾鑫, 潘佳, 孙真荣, 贾天卿2013 物理学报62 094201]
[5]	Richter S, Jia F, Heinrich M, Döring S 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 482
[6]	Agger C, Petersen C 2012 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 29 635
[7]	Zhang Z X, Xu R J, Song L W Wang D, Liu P, Leng Y X 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 184209 (in Chinese)[张宗昕, 许荣杰, 宋立伟, 王丁, 刘鹏, 冷雨欣2012 物理学报61 184209]
[8]	Mauclair C, Mermillod-Blondin A, Landon S, Huot N, Rosenfeld A, Hertel I V, Audouard E, Myiamoto I, Stoian R 2011 Opt. Lett. 36 325
[9]	Dai Y, Hu X, Song J, Yu B K, Qiu J R 2007 Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 1941
[10]	Sun Q, Asahi H, Nishijima Y, Murazawa N, Ueno K, Misawa H 2010 Opt. Express 18 24495
[11]	Gao Y C, Qu S L, Song Y L, Liu S T, Zhao C J, Qiu J R, Zhu C S 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 143 (in Chinese)[高亚臣, 曲士良, 宋瑛林, 刘树田, 赵崇军, 邱建荣, 朱从善 2005 物理学报54 143]
[12]	Jin Z M, Guo F Y, Ma H, Wang L H, Ma G H, Chen J Z 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 087803 (in Chinese)[金钻明, 郭飞云, 马红, 王立华, 马国宏, 陈建中2011 物理学报60 087803]
[13]	Tzortzakis S, Sudrie L, Franco M, Prade B, Mysyrowicz A, Couairon A, Bergé L 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 19
[14]	Sudrie L, Couairon A, Franco M, Lamouroux B, Prade B, Tzortzakis S, Mysyrowicz A 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 186601
[15]	Sun Q, Jiang H, Liu Y, Wu Z, Yang H, Gong Q 2005 Opt. Lett. 30 320
[16]	Burakov I M, Bulgakova N M, Stoian R, Mermillod-Blondin A, Audouard E, Rosenfeld A, Husakou A, Hertel I V 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 101 043506
[17]	Bellec M, Royon A, Bousquet B, Bourhis K 2009 Opt. Express 17 10304
[18]	Couairon A, Sudrie L, Franco M, Prade B, Mysyrowicz A 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 125435
[19]	Stuart B, Feit M, Herman S 1996 Phys. Rev. B 53 1749
[20]	Keldysh L V 1965 Sov. Phys. JETP 20 1307
[21]	Rethfeld B 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 187401
[22]	Jia T Q, Chen H, Zhang Y M 200 Phys. Rev. B 61 16522

施引文献

[1]	Gattass R R, Mazur E 2008 Nature Photon. 2 219
[2]	Poumellec B, Lancry M, Chahid-Erraji A, Kazansky P G 2011 Opt. Mater. Express 1 766
[3]	He F, Cheng Y 2007 Chin. J. Lasers 34 595 (in Chinese)[何飞, 程亚2007 中国激光34 595]
[4]	Peng N N, Huo Y Y, Zhou K, Jia X, Pan J, Sun Z R, Jia T Q 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 094201 (in Chinese)[彭娜娜, 霍燕燕, 周侃, 贾鑫, 潘佳, 孙真荣, 贾天卿2013 物理学报62 094201]
[5]	Richter S, Jia F, Heinrich M, Döring S 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 482
[6]	Agger C, Petersen C 2012 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 29 635
[7]	Zhang Z X, Xu R J, Song L W Wang D, Liu P, Leng Y X 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 184209 (in Chinese)[张宗昕, 许荣杰, 宋立伟, 王丁, 刘鹏, 冷雨欣2012 物理学报61 184209]
[8]	Mauclair C, Mermillod-Blondin A, Landon S, Huot N, Rosenfeld A, Hertel I V, Audouard E, Myiamoto I, Stoian R 2011 Opt. Lett. 36 325
[9]	Dai Y, Hu X, Song J, Yu B K, Qiu J R 2007 Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 1941
[10]	Sun Q, Asahi H, Nishijima Y, Murazawa N, Ueno K, Misawa H 2010 Opt. Express 18 24495
[11]	Gao Y C, Qu S L, Song Y L, Liu S T, Zhao C J, Qiu J R, Zhu C S 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 143 (in Chinese)[高亚臣, 曲士良, 宋瑛林, 刘树田, 赵崇军, 邱建荣, 朱从善 2005 物理学报54 143]
[12]	Jin Z M, Guo F Y, Ma H, Wang L H, Ma G H, Chen J Z 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 087803 (in Chinese)[金钻明, 郭飞云, 马红, 王立华, 马国宏, 陈建中2011 物理学报60 087803]
[13]	Tzortzakis S, Sudrie L, Franco M, Prade B, Mysyrowicz A, Couairon A, Bergé L 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 19
[14]	Sudrie L, Couairon A, Franco M, Lamouroux B, Prade B, Tzortzakis S, Mysyrowicz A 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 186601
[15]	Sun Q, Jiang H, Liu Y, Wu Z, Yang H, Gong Q 2005 Opt. Lett. 30 320
[16]	Burakov I M, Bulgakova N M, Stoian R, Mermillod-Blondin A, Audouard E, Rosenfeld A, Husakou A, Hertel I V 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 101 043506
[17]	Bellec M, Royon A, Bousquet B, Bourhis K 2009 Opt. Express 17 10304
[18]	Couairon A, Sudrie L, Franco M, Prade B, Mysyrowicz A 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 125435
[19]	Stuart B, Feit M, Herman S 1996 Phys. Rev. B 53 1749
[20]	Keldysh L V 1965 Sov. Phys. JETP 20 1307
[21]	Rethfeld B 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 187401
[22]	Jia T Q, Chen H, Zhang Y M 200 Phys. Rev. B 61 16522

引用本文:

Citation:

计量

文章访问数: 1637
PDF下载量: 511
被引次数: 0

紧聚焦飞秒脉冲与石英玻璃相互作用过程中的电子动量弛豫时间研究

1. 上海大学物理系, 上海 200444;

2. 江苏大学材料科学与工程学院, 镇江 212013

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金（批准号：60908007，11174159，61205128）和上海市自然科学基金（批准号：13ZR1414800）资助的课题.

收稿日期: 2013-10-11

修回日期: 2013-12-02

刊出日期: 2014-04-05

摘要: 本文通过数值模拟（3+1）维扩展的广义非线性薛定谔方程，研究了紧聚焦飞秒激光脉冲在诱导石英玻璃的非线性电离过程中电子动量弛豫时间对于该电离过程的影响. 计算结果证明电子动量弛豫时间会直接影响入射脉冲在焦点区域所形成的峰值场强、自由电子态密度和能流等参量的分布态势，因此在与实验结果相比较后发现适合于相互作用过程的电子动量弛豫时间的理论值约为1.27 fs. 进一步的研究表明，电子动量弛豫时间与逆韧致吸收效应、雪崩电离的概率、等离子体密度、等离子体的自散焦效果以及间接引起的焦平面位置的移动都有着密切的联系. 当前的研究结果表明电子动量弛豫时间在飞秒激光脉冲与物质相互作用的过程中发挥着重要作用.

关键词:

Analysis of electron momentum relaxation time in fused silica using a tightly focused femtosecond laser pulse

1.
Department of Physics, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China;

2.
School of Material Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China

Fund Project:

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 60908007, 11174159, 61205128), and the Shanghai Natural Science Foundation, China (Grant No. 13ZR1414800).

Received Date: 11 October 2013

Accepted Date: 02 December 2013

Published Online: 05 April 2014

Abstract: The electron momentum relaxation time is studied systematically in order to understand its effect during the excited nonlinear ionization process in fused silica with an irradiation of tightly focused femtosecond laser pulses. According to the analysis of a (3+1)-dimensional extended general nonlinear Schrödinger equation, the electron momentum relaxation time shows a huge effect on peak intensity, free electron density, and fluence distributions in the focal region of the incident pulse, meanwhile a value of 1.27 fs is thought to meet the present experimental result based on the theoretical model. Further research indicates that the change of electron momentum relaxation time can have significant difference among several nonlinear mechanisms, such as the laser-induced avalanche ionization, reverse bremsstrahlung, self-defocusing of plasma, etc. Results show that the electron momentum relaxation time plays an important role in the process of femtosecond laser pulses interaction with materials.

Keywords:

全文HTML

参考文献 (22)

搜索

留言板