搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

气液混输管线与立管系统严重段塞流数值研究

高嵩 李巍 尤云祥 胡天群

引用本文:
Citation:

气液混输管线与立管系统严重段塞流数值研究

高嵩, 李巍, 尤云祥, 胡天群

Numerical investigation on the gas-liquid severe slugging in a pipeline-riser system

Gao Song, Li Wei, You Yun-Xiang, Hu Tian-Qun
PDF
导出引用
  • 针对气液混输管线与立管系统严重段塞流问题, 采用严重段塞流形成条件一致的等效原则, 发展了一种将三维管道系统等效为二维管道系统的计算流体力学(CFD)数值模拟方法. 以文献中某下倾管与立管组合系统为对象, 结合其实验工况, 对严重段塞流气液流动过程进行了数值模拟, 获得了其周期、压力波动幅值及喷发时间等关键参数的变化规律, 数值模拟与文献所述实验结果符合. 在此基础上, 建立了立管入口气液折算速度、立管含气率以及立管出口平均速度的理论模型, 获得了这些关键参数随时间的变化规律, 并给出了确定立管内气液流型变化的理论方法, 理论结果与CFD数值模拟结果一致. 建立的CFD方法大幅缩减了严重段塞流数值模拟所需的时间和资源, 推导的理论模型揭示了严重段塞流特性参数之间的关联, 可以对严重段塞流所引发的危害进行快速评估及预测,具有一定的工程应用价值.
    Based on the consistence principle for the severe slugging formation condition, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method is proposed for numerically simulating the gas-liquid severe slugging in a pipeline-riser system by converting the three-dimensional pipeline-riser system into a two-dimensional equivalent one. Numerical simulation is conducted for the gas-liquid flow patterns of the severe slugging in a declination pipeline-riser system according to the experimental cases presented in the reference, and variations of characteristics of the flow parameters with gas-liquid superficial velocity due to such a severe slugging are obtained, including period, pressure fluctuation and blowout time, the numerical results are in good agreement with the experimental results. Moreover, the theoretical methods are obtained of determining the gas superficial velocity at the riser inlet, the gas volume fraction in the riser and the average velocity at the riser outlet during the severe slugging blowout stage, and the variations of characteristics of these flow parameters with time are presented. Besides, a theoretical predicting method of determining the flow patterns in the riser during the severe slugging blowout stage is further proposed, and the theoretical results are consistent with the CFD numerical results. The CFD method could save much time and computing resource, and the theoretical methods could be used to predict the damage of severe slugging quickly.
    • 基金项目: 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)(批准号: 2008AA09Z316, SQ2009AA09z3487713)资助的课题.
    • Funds: Project supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2008AA09Z316, SQ2009AA09z3487713).
    [1]

    Yocum B T 1973 SPE European Meeting London, United Kingdom, 2-3 April 1973, SPE4312

    [2]

    Schmidt Z 1977 Ph. D. Dissertation (Tulsa: University of Tulsa)

    [3]

    Farghaly M A 1987 SPE Meeting Bahrain, 7-10 March 1987, SPE15726 p299

    [4]

    Mokhatab S, Towler B F, Purewal S 2007 Petrol. Sci. Technol. 25 1235

    [5]

    Hill T J 1990 Oil & Gas J. 26 88

    [6]

    Mokhatab S, Towler B F 2007 Petrol. Sci. Technol. 25 867

    [7]

    Schmidt Z, Doty D R, Dutta-Roy K 1985 Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 25 p27

    [8]

    Taitel Y, Vierkandt S, Shoham O, Brill J P 1990 Int. J. Multiphase Flow 16 57

    [9]

    Wang X, Guo L J, Zhang X M 2005 J. Eng. Thermophys. 26 799 (in Chinese) [王鑫, 郭烈锦, 张西民 2005 工程热物理学报 26 799]

    [10]

    Pots B F M, Bromilow I G, Konijn M J W F 1987 Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 2 319

    [11]

    Moe J, Lingelem M N, Holm H, Oldervik O 1989 Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Multi-Phase Flow Nice, France, June 1989 p527

    [12]

    Taitel Y, Dukler A E 1976 AICHE Journal 22 47

    [13]

    He L M, Zhao Y C, Luo X M 2004 J. Eng. Thermophys. 25 621 (in Chinese) [何利民, 赵越超, 罗小明 2004 工程热物理学报 25 621]

    [14]

    Ma H W 2008 Ph. D. Dissertation (Dongying: University of Petroleum) (in Chinese) [马华伟 2008 博士学位论文 (东营: 中国石油大学)]

    [15]

    Wang X, Guo L J, He L M 2008 J. Eng. Thermophys. 29 1339 (in Chinese) [王鑫, 郭烈锦, 何利民 2008 工程热物理学报 29 1339]

    [16]

    Luo X M, He L M, Ma H W 2009 J. Chem. Indus. Eng. 60 1656(in Chinese) [罗小明, 何利民, 马华伟 2009 化工学报 60 1656]

    [17]

    Sarica C, Shoham O 1991 Chem. Eng. Sci. 46 2167

    [18]

    Wang X, Guo L J 2006 J. Eng. Thermophys. 27 611 (in Chinese) [王鑫, 郭烈锦 2006 工程热物理学报 27 611]

    [19]

    Liu M E, Li Q P, An W J, Gong J, Wu Y X 2007 China Offshore Oil and Gas 19 125 (in Chinese) [刘淼儿, 李清平, 安维杰, 宫敬, 吴应湘 2007 中国海上油气 19 125]

    [20]

    Balino J L, Burr K P, Nemoto R H 2010 Int. J. Multiphase Flow 36 643

    [21]

    Bendiksen K H, Malnes D, Moe D, Nuland S 1991 Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 6 171

    [22]

    Straume T, Nordsveen M, Bendiksen K 1992 ASME Int. Symp. on Multiphase Flow in Wells and Pipelines Anaheim, U.S.A., 8-13 Nov., 1992 p103

    [23]

    Lima P C R 1999 Ph. D. Dissertation (Cranfield: Cranfield University)

    [24]

    Pauchon C, Dulseia H, Cirlot G B, Fabre J 1994 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition New Orleans, Louisiana, 25-28 September, 1994 p311

    [25]

    Dong F, Jin N D, Zong Y B, Wang Z Y 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 6145 (in Chinese) [董芳, 金宁德, 宗艳波, 王振亚 2008 物理学报 57 6145]

    [26]

    Jin N D, Dong F, Zhao S 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 720 (in Chinese) [金宁德, 董芳, 赵舒 2007 物理学报 56 720]

    [27]

    Parvareh A, Rahimi M, Alizadehdakhel A, Alsirafi A A 2010 Int. Commun. Heat and Mass Trans. 37 304

    [28]

    Mukherjee H, Brill J P 1983 J. Pet. Technol. 35 1003

    [29]

    Hirt C W, Nichols B D 1981 Trans. of the ASME: J. Pressure Vessel Tech. 103 136

    [30]

    Liu Y Z, Miao G P 2002 Advanced Hydrodynamics (Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University Press) p3 (in Chinese) [刘应中, 缪国平 2002 高等流体力学 (上海: 上海交通大学出版社) 第3页]

    [31]

    Brackbill J U, Kothe D B, Zemach C 1992 J. Cornpu. Phys. 100 335

    [32]

    Hewitt G F, Roberts D N 1969 Atomic Energy Research Establishment London, United Kingdom, 1 Jan., 1969 AERE-M2159

    [33]

    Xia G D, Zhou F D, Hu M S 1997 J. Chem. Indus. Eng. 48 729 (in Chinese) [夏国栋, 周芳德, 胡明胜 1997 化工学报 48 729]

  • [1]

    Yocum B T 1973 SPE European Meeting London, United Kingdom, 2-3 April 1973, SPE4312

    [2]

    Schmidt Z 1977 Ph. D. Dissertation (Tulsa: University of Tulsa)

    [3]

    Farghaly M A 1987 SPE Meeting Bahrain, 7-10 March 1987, SPE15726 p299

    [4]

    Mokhatab S, Towler B F, Purewal S 2007 Petrol. Sci. Technol. 25 1235

    [5]

    Hill T J 1990 Oil & Gas J. 26 88

    [6]

    Mokhatab S, Towler B F 2007 Petrol. Sci. Technol. 25 867

    [7]

    Schmidt Z, Doty D R, Dutta-Roy K 1985 Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 25 p27

    [8]

    Taitel Y, Vierkandt S, Shoham O, Brill J P 1990 Int. J. Multiphase Flow 16 57

    [9]

    Wang X, Guo L J, Zhang X M 2005 J. Eng. Thermophys. 26 799 (in Chinese) [王鑫, 郭烈锦, 张西民 2005 工程热物理学报 26 799]

    [10]

    Pots B F M, Bromilow I G, Konijn M J W F 1987 Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 2 319

    [11]

    Moe J, Lingelem M N, Holm H, Oldervik O 1989 Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Multi-Phase Flow Nice, France, June 1989 p527

    [12]

    Taitel Y, Dukler A E 1976 AICHE Journal 22 47

    [13]

    He L M, Zhao Y C, Luo X M 2004 J. Eng. Thermophys. 25 621 (in Chinese) [何利民, 赵越超, 罗小明 2004 工程热物理学报 25 621]

    [14]

    Ma H W 2008 Ph. D. Dissertation (Dongying: University of Petroleum) (in Chinese) [马华伟 2008 博士学位论文 (东营: 中国石油大学)]

    [15]

    Wang X, Guo L J, He L M 2008 J. Eng. Thermophys. 29 1339 (in Chinese) [王鑫, 郭烈锦, 何利民 2008 工程热物理学报 29 1339]

    [16]

    Luo X M, He L M, Ma H W 2009 J. Chem. Indus. Eng. 60 1656(in Chinese) [罗小明, 何利民, 马华伟 2009 化工学报 60 1656]

    [17]

    Sarica C, Shoham O 1991 Chem. Eng. Sci. 46 2167

    [18]

    Wang X, Guo L J 2006 J. Eng. Thermophys. 27 611 (in Chinese) [王鑫, 郭烈锦 2006 工程热物理学报 27 611]

    [19]

    Liu M E, Li Q P, An W J, Gong J, Wu Y X 2007 China Offshore Oil and Gas 19 125 (in Chinese) [刘淼儿, 李清平, 安维杰, 宫敬, 吴应湘 2007 中国海上油气 19 125]

    [20]

    Balino J L, Burr K P, Nemoto R H 2010 Int. J. Multiphase Flow 36 643

    [21]

    Bendiksen K H, Malnes D, Moe D, Nuland S 1991 Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 6 171

    [22]

    Straume T, Nordsveen M, Bendiksen K 1992 ASME Int. Symp. on Multiphase Flow in Wells and Pipelines Anaheim, U.S.A., 8-13 Nov., 1992 p103

    [23]

    Lima P C R 1999 Ph. D. Dissertation (Cranfield: Cranfield University)

    [24]

    Pauchon C, Dulseia H, Cirlot G B, Fabre J 1994 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition New Orleans, Louisiana, 25-28 September, 1994 p311

    [25]

    Dong F, Jin N D, Zong Y B, Wang Z Y 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 6145 (in Chinese) [董芳, 金宁德, 宗艳波, 王振亚 2008 物理学报 57 6145]

    [26]

    Jin N D, Dong F, Zhao S 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 720 (in Chinese) [金宁德, 董芳, 赵舒 2007 物理学报 56 720]

    [27]

    Parvareh A, Rahimi M, Alizadehdakhel A, Alsirafi A A 2010 Int. Commun. Heat and Mass Trans. 37 304

    [28]

    Mukherjee H, Brill J P 1983 J. Pet. Technol. 35 1003

    [29]

    Hirt C W, Nichols B D 1981 Trans. of the ASME: J. Pressure Vessel Tech. 103 136

    [30]

    Liu Y Z, Miao G P 2002 Advanced Hydrodynamics (Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University Press) p3 (in Chinese) [刘应中, 缪国平 2002 高等流体力学 (上海: 上海交通大学出版社) 第3页]

    [31]

    Brackbill J U, Kothe D B, Zemach C 1992 J. Cornpu. Phys. 100 335

    [32]

    Hewitt G F, Roberts D N 1969 Atomic Energy Research Establishment London, United Kingdom, 1 Jan., 1969 AERE-M2159

    [33]

    Xia G D, Zhou F D, Hu M S 1997 J. Chem. Indus. Eng. 48 729 (in Chinese) [夏国栋, 周芳德, 胡明胜 1997 化工学报 48 729]

  • [1] 郅长红, 徐双东, 韩盼盼, 陈科, 尤云祥. 高阶单向传播内孤立波理论模型适用性. 物理学报, 2022, 71(17): 174701. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220411
    [2] 左娟莉, 杨泓, 魏炳乾, 侯精明, 张凯. 气力提升系统气液两相流数值模拟分析. 物理学报, 2020, 69(6): 064705. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191755
    [3] 彭旭, 李斌, 王顺尧, 饶国宁, 陈网桦. 激波冲击作用下液膜破碎的气液两相流. 物理学报, 2020, 69(24): 244702. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201051
    [4] 娄钦, 黄一帆, 李凌. 不可压幂律流体气-液两相流格子Boltzmann 模型及其在多孔介质内驱替问题中的应用. 物理学报, 2019, 68(21): 214702. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190873
    [5] 李洋, 苏婷, 梁宏, 徐江荣. 耦合界面力的两相流相场格子Boltzmann模型. 物理学报, 2018, 67(22): 224701. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181230
    [6] 梁霄, 王瑞利. 爆轰流体力学模型敏感度分析与模型确认. 物理学报, 2017, 66(11): 116401. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.116401
    [7] 翟路生, 金宁德. 小管径气液两相流空隙率波传播的多尺度相关性. 物理学报, 2016, 65(1): 010501. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.010501
    [8] 陈大伟, 王裴, 蔚喜军, 孙海权, 马东军. 稠密可压缩气粒两相流动中的等熵声速计算建模及物理规律. 物理学报, 2016, 65(9): 094702. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.094702
    [9] 陈平, 杜亚威, 薛友林. 垂直气液两相流混沌吸引子单元面积分析. 物理学报, 2016, 65(3): 034701. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.034701
    [10] 李多芳, 曹天光, 耿金鹏, 展永. 电离辐射致植物诱变效应的损伤-修复模型. 物理学报, 2015, 64(24): 248701. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.248701
    [11] 赵俊英, 金宁德, 高忠科. 油气水三相流段塞流不稳定周期轨道探寻. 物理学报, 2013, 62(8): 084701. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.084701
    [12] 危卫, 鲁录义, 顾兆林. 风沙运动的电场-流场耦合模型及气固两相流数值模拟. 物理学报, 2012, 61(15): 158301. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.158301
    [13] 孙斌, 王二朋, 郑永军. 气液两相流波动信号的时频谱分析研究. 物理学报, 2011, 60(1): 014701. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.014701
    [14] 温坚, 田欢欢, 薛郁. 考虑次近邻作用的行人交通格子流体力学模型. 物理学报, 2010, 59(6): 3817-3823. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.3817
    [15] 房振乾, 胡 明, 张 伟, 张绪瑞. 基于微拉曼光谱技术的氧化介孔硅热导率研究. 物理学报, 2008, 57(1): 103-110. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.103
    [16] 庞海龙, 李英骏, 鲁 欣, 张 杰. 基于高斯型脉冲驱动的类镍瞬态X射线激光的流体力学模型. 物理学报, 2006, 55(12): 6382-6386. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.6382
    [17] 王德真, 马腾才. 重粒子在阴极鞘层中输运的理论模型. 物理学报, 2000, 49(12): 2404-2407. doi: 10.7498/aps.49.2404
    [18] 杨维纮, 胡希伟. 非均匀载流柱形等离子体中的磁流体力学波. 物理学报, 1996, 45(4): 595-600. doi: 10.7498/aps.45.595
    [19] 刘慕仁, 孔令江, 江峰. Frish-Hasslecher-Pomeau流体力学模型的平均自由程. 物理学报, 1991, 40(11): 1736-1740. doi: 10.7498/aps.40.1736
    [20] 李富斌. 由微观随机动力学导出非平衡稳定态的长程相关性(Ⅰ)——用随机点阵气模型构造出宏观涨落流体力学理论. 物理学报, 1990, 39(3): 381-390. doi: 10.7498/aps.39.381
计量
  • 文章访问数:  6267
  • PDF下载量:  766
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2011-08-25
  • 修回日期:  2012-05-28
  • 刊出日期:  2012-05-05

/

返回文章
返回