搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

关于多比特电路量子动力学系统中光子自由度的消除方案研究

孟建宇 王培月 冯伟 杨国建 李新奇

引用本文:
Citation:

关于多比特电路量子动力学系统中光子自由度的消除方案研究

孟建宇, 王培月, 冯伟, 杨国建, 李新奇

On the scheme of cavity photon elimination in multi-qubit circuit-quantum electrodynamics system

Meng Jian-Yu, Wang Pei-Yue, Feng Wei, Yang Guo-Jian, Li Xin-Qi
PDF
导出引用
  • 基于超导传输线和超导量子比特相互耦合的电路量子电动力学 (quantum electrodynamics, QED)系统, 是研究固态量子信息和量子测量与控制的理想实验平台. 本文在已有工作(单比特电路QED)基础上, 进一步研究多比特电路QED系统. 具体通过对两比特系统的量子测量和量子控制动力学的模拟, 检验了"绝热消除"和"极化子变换"两种消除微腔光子自由度方法的适用条件. 和单比特情况不同, 我们特别检验了两比特系统Bell纠缠态的"确定性"制备问题. 在量子路径水平上模拟发现, 由于反馈操作引起量子比特状态翻转, 使得极化子变换方法失效,它所导出的"有效测量算符" (其中含有非平庸的"宇称项")此时也将变得没有意义.
    Solid-state superconducting circuit-quantum electrodynamics (QED) system is a promising candidate for quantum information processing and an ideal platform for quantum measurement and quantum control studies. As an extension to our previous simulation for single qubit circuit-QED, in this work we simulate the quantum measurement and control of multi-qubit system. Particularly, we consider the deterministic generation of a two-qubit Bell state. In this context we examine the validity conditions of two cavity-photon-elimination scheme. On the level of quantum trajectory simulation, we find that, owing to the qubit flip caused by feedback, the advanced polaron-transformation scheme is no longer applicable if the measurement is not weak, which also makes meaningless the elegant effective measurement operator.
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 101202101, 10874176) 和国家科技部973项目(批准号: 2011CB808502, 2012CB932704)资助的课题.
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 101202101, 10874176 ),and the Major State Basic Research Project of China (Grant Nos. 2011CB808502, 2012CB932704).
    [1]

    Blais A, Huang R S, Wallraff A, Girvin S M, Schoelkopf R J 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 062320

    [2]

    Wallraff A, Schuster D I, Blais A, Frunzio L, Huang R S, Majer J, Kumar S, Girvin S M, Schoelkopf R J 2004 Nature (London) 431 162

    [3]

    Haroche S, Kleppner D 1989 Phys. Today 24

    [4]

    Schuster D I, Houck A A, Schreier J A, Wallraff A, Gambetta J M, Blais A, Frunzio L, Majer J, Johnson B, Devoret M H, Girvin S M, Schoelkopf R J 2007 Nature 445 515

    [5]

    Houck A A, Schuster D I, Gambetta J, Schreier J A, Johnson B R, Chow J M, Frunzio L, Majer J, Devoret M H, Girvin S M, Schoelkopf R J 2007 Nature 449 328

    [6]

    Hofheinz M, Weig E M, Ansmann M, Bialczak R C, Lucero E, Neeley M, O'Connell A D, Wang H, Martinis J M, Cleland A N 2008 Nature 454 310

    [7]

    Leek P J, Fink J M, Blais A, Bianchetti R, Gppl M, Gambetta J M, Schuster D I, Frunzio L, Schoelkopf R J, Wallraff A 2007 Science 318 1889

    [8]

    Astafiev O, Inomata K, Niskanen A O, Yamamoto T, Pashkin Y A, Nakamura Y, Tsai J S 2007 Nature 449 588

    [9]

    Schuster D I, Wallraff A, Blais A, Frunzio L, Huang R S, Majer J, Girvin S M, Schoelkopf R J 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 123602

    [10]

    Gambetta J, Blais A, Schuster D I, Wallraff A, Frunzio L, Majer J, Devoret M H, Girvin S M, Schoelkopf R J 2006 Phys. Rev. A 74 042318

    [11]

    Majer J, Chow J M, Gambetta J M, Koch J, Johnson B R, Schreier J A, Frunzio L, Schuster D I, Houck A A, Wallraff A, Blais A, Devoret M H, Girvin S M, Schoelkopf R J 2007 Nature 449 443

    [12]

    Sarovar M, Goan H S, Spiller T P, Milburn G J 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 062327

    [13]

    Liu Z, Kuang L, Hu K, Xu L, Wei S, Guo L, Li X Q 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 032335

    [14]

    Feng W, Wang P, Ding X, Xu L, Li X Q 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 042313

    [15]

    Wiseman H M, Milburn G J 1993 Phys. Rev. A 47 642

    [16]

    Gambetta J M, Blais A, Boissonneault M, Houck A A, Schuster D I, Girvin S M 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 012112

    [17]

    Hutchison C L, Gambetta J M, Blais A, Wilhelm, F K 2009 Can. J. Phys. 87 225

    [18]

    Jaynes E T, Cummings F W 1963 Proc. IEEE 51 89

    [19]

    Tavis M, Cummings F W 1968 Phys. Rev. 170 379

    [20]

    Wiseman H M, Milburn G J 2010 Quantum Measurement and Control, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England

    [21]

    Lalumiere K, Gambetta J M, Blais A 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 040301(R)

    [22]

    Ruskov R, Korotkov A N 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 041401(R)

    [23]

    Jin J S, Li X Q, Yan Y J 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 23330

  • [1]

    Blais A, Huang R S, Wallraff A, Girvin S M, Schoelkopf R J 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 062320

    [2]

    Wallraff A, Schuster D I, Blais A, Frunzio L, Huang R S, Majer J, Kumar S, Girvin S M, Schoelkopf R J 2004 Nature (London) 431 162

    [3]

    Haroche S, Kleppner D 1989 Phys. Today 24

    [4]

    Schuster D I, Houck A A, Schreier J A, Wallraff A, Gambetta J M, Blais A, Frunzio L, Majer J, Johnson B, Devoret M H, Girvin S M, Schoelkopf R J 2007 Nature 445 515

    [5]

    Houck A A, Schuster D I, Gambetta J, Schreier J A, Johnson B R, Chow J M, Frunzio L, Majer J, Devoret M H, Girvin S M, Schoelkopf R J 2007 Nature 449 328

    [6]

    Hofheinz M, Weig E M, Ansmann M, Bialczak R C, Lucero E, Neeley M, O'Connell A D, Wang H, Martinis J M, Cleland A N 2008 Nature 454 310

    [7]

    Leek P J, Fink J M, Blais A, Bianchetti R, Gppl M, Gambetta J M, Schuster D I, Frunzio L, Schoelkopf R J, Wallraff A 2007 Science 318 1889

    [8]

    Astafiev O, Inomata K, Niskanen A O, Yamamoto T, Pashkin Y A, Nakamura Y, Tsai J S 2007 Nature 449 588

    [9]

    Schuster D I, Wallraff A, Blais A, Frunzio L, Huang R S, Majer J, Girvin S M, Schoelkopf R J 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 123602

    [10]

    Gambetta J, Blais A, Schuster D I, Wallraff A, Frunzio L, Majer J, Devoret M H, Girvin S M, Schoelkopf R J 2006 Phys. Rev. A 74 042318

    [11]

    Majer J, Chow J M, Gambetta J M, Koch J, Johnson B R, Schreier J A, Frunzio L, Schuster D I, Houck A A, Wallraff A, Blais A, Devoret M H, Girvin S M, Schoelkopf R J 2007 Nature 449 443

    [12]

    Sarovar M, Goan H S, Spiller T P, Milburn G J 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 062327

    [13]

    Liu Z, Kuang L, Hu K, Xu L, Wei S, Guo L, Li X Q 2010 Phys. Rev. A 82 032335

    [14]

    Feng W, Wang P, Ding X, Xu L, Li X Q 2011 Phys. Rev. A 83 042313

    [15]

    Wiseman H M, Milburn G J 1993 Phys. Rev. A 47 642

    [16]

    Gambetta J M, Blais A, Boissonneault M, Houck A A, Schuster D I, Girvin S M 2008 Phys. Rev. A 77 012112

    [17]

    Hutchison C L, Gambetta J M, Blais A, Wilhelm, F K 2009 Can. J. Phys. 87 225

    [18]

    Jaynes E T, Cummings F W 1963 Proc. IEEE 51 89

    [19]

    Tavis M, Cummings F W 1968 Phys. Rev. 170 379

    [20]

    Wiseman H M, Milburn G J 2010 Quantum Measurement and Control, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England

    [21]

    Lalumiere K, Gambetta J M, Blais A 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 040301(R)

    [22]

    Ruskov R, Korotkov A N 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 041401(R)

    [23]

    Jin J S, Li X Q, Yan Y J 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 23330

  • [1] 袁家望, 陈立, 张云波. 自旋-轨道耦合玻色爱因斯坦凝聚中多能级绝热消除理论. 物理学报, 2023, 72(21): 216701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231052
    [2] 王雪梅, 张安琪, 赵生妹. 电路量子电动力学中基于超绝热捷径的控制相位门实现. 物理学报, 2022, 71(15): 150301. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220248
    [3] 赵翠兰, 王丽丽, 赵丽丽. 有限深抛物势量子盘中极化子的激发态性质. 物理学报, 2015, 64(18): 186301. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.186301
    [4] 额尔敦朝鲁, 白旭芳, 韩超. 抛物量子点中强耦合磁双极化子内部激发态性质. 物理学报, 2014, 63(2): 027501. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.027501
    [5] 刘炳灿, 李华, 严亮星, 孙慧, 田强. GaAs薄膜的有效量子限制长度及其极化子特性. 物理学报, 2013, 62(19): 197302. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.197302
    [6] 王启文, 红兰. 二维量子点中极化子的自旋弛豫. 物理学报, 2012, 61(1): 017107. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.017107
    [7] 任学藻, 贺树, 丛红璐, 王旭文. 两格点两电子Hubbard-Holstein模型极化子的量子纠缠特性. 物理学报, 2012, 61(12): 124207. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.124207
    [8] 赵翠兰, 丛银川. 球壳量子点中极化子和量子比特的声子效应. 物理学报, 2012, 61(18): 186301. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.186301
    [9] 孟建宇, 王培月, 冯伟, 杨国建, 李新奇. 关于电路量子电动力学系统中光子自由度的消除方案. 物理学报, 2012, 61(18): 180302. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.180302
    [10] 马伟, 王明渝, 聂海龙. 单周期控制Boost变换器Hopf分岔控制及电路实现. 物理学报, 2011, 60(10): 100202. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.100202
    [11] 赵翠兰, 高宽云. 声子和磁场对量子环中极化子性质的影响. 物理学报, 2010, 59(7): 4857-4862. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.4857
    [12] 额尔敦朝鲁, 于若蒙. 非对称量子点中磁极化子性质的磁场和温度依赖性. 物理学报, 2008, 57(11): 7100-7107. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.7100
    [13] 赵凤岐, 周炳卿. 外电场作用下纤锌矿氮化物抛物量子阱中极化子能级. 物理学报, 2007, 56(8): 4856-4863. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.4856
    [14] 卢伟国, 周雒维, 罗全明, 杜 雄. BOOST变换器延迟反馈混沌控制及其优化. 物理学报, 2007, 56(11): 6275-6281. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.6275
    [15] 向少华, 宋克慧. 用腔场QED技术实现量子信息转移. 物理学报, 2005, 54(3): 1190-1193. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.1190
    [16] 陈菊芳, 程 丽, 刘 颖, 彭建华. 延迟变量反馈法控制离散混沌系统的电路实验. 物理学报, 2003, 52(1): 18-24. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.18
    [17] 刘翠红, 陈传誉, 马本堃. 极化子效应对量子盘中线性和非线性光吸收系数的影响. 物理学报, 2002, 51(9): 2022-2028. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.2022
    [18] 赵国忠, 潘少华, 杨国桢. 对称量子阱中极化子的有效质量和自陷能. 物理学报, 1995, 44(8): 1335-1343. doi: 10.7498/aps.44.1335
    [19] 黄卓和, 陈传誉, 陈芝得, 张树群. 稳恒电、磁场中量子阱内极化子的基态能量. 物理学报, 1994, 43(1): 91-98. doi: 10.7498/aps.43.91
    [20] 林仁明, 张林. 受驱动光学系统多光子量子统计理论(Ⅲ)——绝热消除方法的改进. 物理学报, 1989, 38(4): 548-558. doi: 10.7498/aps.38.548
计量
  • 文章访问数:  6983
  • PDF下载量:  349
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2012-04-17
  • 修回日期:  2012-07-08
  • 刊出日期:  2012-12-05

/

返回文章
返回