石墨烯等离激元增强红外光谱

吴晨晨; 郭相东; 胡海; 杨晓霞; 戴庆

doi:10.7498/aps.68.20190903

摘要

红外光谱能够精准反映分子振动的信息, 是表征材料成分和结构的重要手段. 但是纳米尺度材料与微米尺度红外光波长之间约三个数量级的尺寸失配导致两者之间相互作用十分微弱, 无法直接进行红外光谱表征. 因此如何获得微量纳米材料的红外光谱信息成为了近年来红外光谱领域面临的关键挑战. 等离激元能够将光场压缩实现局域光场增强, 从而增强光与物质的相互作用. 其中石墨烯等离激元因其具有高光场压缩、电学动态可调和低本征衰减等优点, 为表面增强红外光谱提供了重要的解决方案. 本文首先从不同材料体系出发介绍了红外等离激元, 在此基础上从石墨烯的基本性质出发总结石墨烯等离激元及其在表面增强红外光谱上的优势, 并重点介绍了石墨烯等离激元增强红外光谱的最新进展和应用, 包括单分子层生物化学探测、气体识别和折射率传感等. 最后对石墨烯等离激元增强红外光谱的下一步发展方向和应用前景进行了展望.

关键词:

Abstract

Infrared spectroscopy can accurately reflect the information of molecular vibration, and it is an important technology to characterize the composition and structure of materials. However, since the interaction between nanomaterials and infrared light is very weak due to the significant size mismatch, it is challenging to obtain the spectral information of nanomaterials in the field of infrared spectroscopy. The plasmon is a collective electron oscillation on the surface of the material inducing by the incident light, and it has excellent light field confinement, which can significantly enhance the interaction between light and nanomaterials. Graphene plasmon has prominent properties, such as high light field confinement, dynamic adjustment, and low intrinsic attenuation. Therefore it is an important solution to enhance the infrared absorption of nanomaterials. This article systematically introduces the infrared plasmon materials system. Then it summarizes the characteristics of graphene plasmon and their advantages on surface enhanced infrared spectroscopy, and it emphasizes the recent important researches and applications of graphene plasmon enhanced infrared spectroscopy in the world, including single molecular layer biochemical detection, gas identification, refractive index sensing, etc. Further prospects for the development and potential applications of graphene plasmon enhanced infrared spectroscopy are also demonstrated.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

1.
国家纳米科学中心, 中国科学院纳米科学卓越创新中心, 北京　100190

2.
中国科学院大学, 材料与光电研究中心, 北京　100049

通信作者: 杨晓霞, yangxx@nanoctr.cn ; 戴庆, daiq@nanoctr.cn

基金项目: 国家重点基础研究发展计划 (批准号: 2015CB932400)、国家重点研发计划 (批准号: 2016YFA0201600)、国家自然科学基金 (批准号: 11674073, 11504063, 11704085)、中国科学院前沿科学重点研究项目 (批准号: QYZDB-SSW-SLH021)、中国科学院重点部署项目 (批准号: ZDBS-SSW-JSC002)和中国科学院青年创新促进会和中国科学院创新交叉团队项目 (批准号: JCTD-2018-03)资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

1.
Division of Nanophotonics, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190, China

2.
Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Corresponding author: Yang Xiao-Xia, yangxx@nanoctr.cn ; Dai Qing, daiq@nanoctr.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Basic Key Research Program of China (Grant No. 2015CB932400), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0201600), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11674073, 11504063, 11704085), the Key Program of the Bureau of Frontier Sciences and Education, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. QYZDB-SSW-SLH021), the Key Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. ZDBS-SSW-JSC002), and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association Chinese Academy of Sciences and CAS Interdisciplinary Innovation Team (Grant No. JCTD-2018-03).

文章全文 : translate this paragraph

参考文献

[1]	Magazu S, Calabro E 2011 J. Phys. Chem. B 115 6818 Google Scholar
[2]	Brar V W, Jang M S, Sherrott M, Lopez J J, Atwater H A 2013 Nano Lett. 13 2541 Google Scholar
[3]	Yang X, Sun Z, Low T, Hu H, Guo X, Garcia de Abajo F J, Avouris P, Dai Q 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 e1704896 Google Scholar
[4]	Zhang G, Huang S, Chaves A, Song C, Ozcelik V O, Low T, Yan H 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 14071 Google Scholar
[5]	Li P, Dolado I, Alfaro-Mozaz F J, CasanovaF, Hueso L E, Liu S, Edgar J H, Nikitin A, Vélez S, Hillenbrand R 2018 Science 359 892 Google Scholar
[6]	Li Y, Yan H, Farmer D B, Meng X, Zhu W, Osgood R M, Heinz T F, Avouris P 2014 Nano Lett. 14 1573 Google Scholar
[7]	Low T, Chaves A, Caldwell J D, Kumar A, Fang N X, Avouris P, Heinz T F, Guinea F, Martin-Moreno L, Koppens F 2017 Nat. Mater. 16 182 Google Scholar
[8]	Hartstein A, Kirtley J R, Tsang J C 1980 Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 201 Google Scholar
[9]	Yanik A A, Huang M, Kamohara O, Artar A, Geisbert T W, Connor J H, Altug H 2010 Nano Lett. 10 4962 Google Scholar
[10]	Rodrigo D, Tittl A, Limaj O, Abajo F J G, Pruneri V, Altug H 2017 Light Sci. Appl. 6 e16277 Google Scholar
[11]	Yan H, Li X, Chandra B, Tulevski G, Wu Y, Freitag M, Zhu W, Avouris P, Xia F 2012 Nat. Nanotechnol. 7 330 Google Scholar
[12]	Liao B, Guo X, Hu H, Liu N, Chen K, Yang X, Dai Q 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 094101 Google Scholar
[13]	Grigorenko A N, Polini M, Novoselov K S 2012 Nat. Photon. 6 749 Google Scholar
[14]	杨晓霞, 孔祥天, 戴庆 2015 物理学报 64 106801 Google Scholar Yang X X, Kong X T, Dai Q 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 106801 Google Scholar
[15]	Hwang E H, Das Sarma S 2007 Phys. Rev. B 75 205418 Google Scholar
[16]	Ju L, Geng B, Horng J, Girit C, Martin M, Hao Z, Bechtel H A, Liang X, Zettl A, Shen Y R, Wang F 2011 Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 630 Google Scholar
[17]	Chen J, Badioli M, Alonso-González P, Thongrattanasiri S, Huth F, Osmond J, Spasenović M, Centeno A, Pesquera A, Godignon P, Zurutuza Elorza A, Camara N, García de Abajo F J, Hillenbrand R, Koppens F H L 2012 Nature 487 77 Google Scholar
[18]	Fei Z, Rodin A S, Andreev G O, Bao W, McLeod A S, Wagner M, Zhang L M, Zhao Z, Thiemens M, Dominguez G, Fogler M M, Castro Neto A H, Lau C N, Keilmann F, Basov D N 2012 Nature 487 82 Google Scholar
[19]	Yan H, Low T, Zhu W, Wu Y, Freitag M, Li X, Guinea F, Avouris P, Xia F 2013 Nat. Photon. 7 394 Google Scholar
[20]	Wang J, Hernandez Y, Lotya M, Coleman J N, Blau W J 2009 Adv. Mater. 21 2430 Google Scholar
[21]	Liu M, Yin X, Ulin-Avila E, Geng B, Zentgraf T, Ju L, Wang F, Zhang X 2011 Nature 474 64 Google Scholar
[22]	Ye L, Sui K, Zhang Y, Liu Q H 2019 Nanoscale 11 3229 Google Scholar
[23]	Zhu A Y, Cubukcu E 2015 2D Mater. 2 032005 Google Scholar
[24]	Hu H, Yang X, Zhai F, Hu D, Liu R, Liu K, Sun Z, Dai Q 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 12334 Google Scholar
[25]	Rodrigo D, Limaj O, Janner D, Etezadi D, García de Abajo F J, Pruneri V, Altug H 2015 Science 349 165 Google Scholar
[26]	Wu C, Liu N, Hu H, Guo X, Liao B, Liu J, Wang L, Chen C, Yang X, Dai Q 2019 Chin. Opt. Lett. 6 062401 Google Scholar
[27]	Hu H, Yang X, Guo X, Khaliji K, Biswas S R, Garcia de Abajo F J, Low T, Sun Z, Dai Q 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 1131 Google Scholar
[28]	Wenger T, Viola G, Kinaret J, Fogelström M, Tassin P 2017 2D Mater. 4 025103 Google Scholar
[29]	Guo X, Hu H, Zhu X, Yang X, Dai Q 2017 Nanoscale 9 14998 Google Scholar
[30]	Ni G X, McLeod A S, Sun Z, Wang L, Xiong L, Post K W, Sunku S S, Jiang B Y, Hone J, Dean C R, Fogler M M, Basov D N 2018 Nature 557 530 Google Scholar
[31]	Jablan M, Buljan H, Soljačić M 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 245435 Google Scholar
[32]	Liu J P, Zhai X, Wang L L, Li H J, Xie F, Xia S X, Shang X J, Luo X 2016 Opt. Express 24 5376 Google Scholar
[33]	Reale C 1974 J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 4 2218 Google Scholar
[34]	Basov D N, Fogler M M, Garcia de Abajo F J 2016 Science 354 6309 Google Scholar
[35]	Soref R, Peale R E, Buchwald W 2008 Opt. Express 16 6507 Google Scholar
[36]	Naik G V, Shalaev V M, Boltasseva A 2013 Adv. Mater. 25 3264 Google Scholar
[37]	Ueno K, Nakamura S, Shimotani H, Yuan H T, Kimura N, Nojima T, Aoki H, Iwasa Y, Kawasaki M 2011 Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 408 Google Scholar
[38]	Tassin P, Koschny T, Kafesaki M, Soukoulis C M 2012 Nat. Photon. 6 259 Google Scholar
[39]	Huynh K K, Tanabe Y, Urata T, Oguro H, Heguri S, Watanabe K, Tanigaki K 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90 144516 Google Scholar
[40]	Yuan J, Ma W, Zhang L, Lu Y, Zhao M, Guo H, Zhao J, Yu W, Zhang Y, Zhang K, Hoh H Y, Li X, Loh K P, Li S, Qiu C W, Bao Q 2017 ACS Photon. 4 3055 Google Scholar
[41]	Deshko Y, Krusin-Elbaum L, Menon V, Khanikaev A, Trevino J 2016 Opt. Express 24 7398 Google Scholar
[42]	Butch N P, Kirshenbaum K, Syers P, Sushkov A B, Jenkins G S, Drew H D, Paglione J 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 241301 Google Scholar
[43]	Alcaraz Iranzo D, Nanot S, Dias E J C, Epstein I, Peng C, Efetov D K, Lundeberg M B, Parret R, Osmond J, Hong J Y, Kong J, Englund D R, Peres N M R, Koppens F H L 2018 Science 360 291 Google Scholar
[44]	Chiu K C, Falk A L, Ho P H, Farmer D B, Tulevski G, Lee Y H, Avouris P, Han S J 2017 Nano Lett. 17 5641 Google Scholar
[45]	Hartmann N, Piredda G, Berthelot J, Colas des Francs G, Bouhelier A, Hartschuh A 2012 Nano Lett. 12 177 Google Scholar
[46]	Javey A, Kim H, Brink M, Wang Q, Ural A, Guo J, McIntyre P, McEuen P, Lundstrom M, Dai H 2002 Nat. Mater. 1 241 Google Scholar
[47]	Shi Z, Hong X, Bechtel H A, Zeng B, Martin M C, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Shen Y R, Wang F 2015 Nat. Photon. 9 515 Google Scholar
[48]	Falk A L, Chiu K C, Farmer D B, Cao Q, Tersoff J, Lee Y H, Avouris P, Han S J 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 257401 Google Scholar
[49]	王文慧, 张孬 2018 物理学报 67 247302 Google Scholar Wang W, Zhang N 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 247302 Google Scholar
[50]	Li Z, Yu X, Fu X, Hao Z, Li K 2008 Chin. Phys. Lett. 25 1776 Google Scholar
[51]	Kundu J, Le F, Nordlander P, Halas N J 2008 Chem. Phys. Lett. 452 115 Google Scholar
[52]	Brown L V, Yang X, Zhao K, Zheng B Y, Nordlander P, Halas N J 2015 Nano Lett. 15 1272 Google Scholar
[53]	Willets K A, van Duyne R P 2007 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 58 267 Google Scholar
[54]	Schaadt D M, Feng B, Yu E T 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 063106 Google Scholar
[55]	Mulvaney P 1996 Langmuir 12 788 Google Scholar
[56]	El-Sayed K S, El-Sayed M A 2006 J. Phys. Chem. B 110 19220 Google Scholar
[57]	Nikitin A Y, Guinea F, Garcia-Vidal F J, Martin-Moreno L 2012 Phys. Rev. B 85 081405 Google Scholar
[58]	Huang Y W, Lee H W H, Sokhoyan R, Pala R A, Thyagarajan K, Han S, Tsai D P, Atwater H A 2016 Nano Lett. 16 5319 Google Scholar
[59]	Baldassarre L, Sakat E, Frigerio J, Samarelli A, Gallacher K, Calandrini E, Isella G, Paul D J, Ortolani M, Biagioni P 2015 Nano Lett. 15 7225 Google Scholar
[60]	Abb M, Wang Y, Papasimakis N, de Groot C H, Muskens O L 2014 Nano Lett. 14 346 Google Scholar
[61]	Samarelli A, Frigerio J, Sakat E, Baldassarre L, Gallacher K, Finazzi M, Isella G, Ortolani M, Biagioni P, Paul D J 2016 Thin Solid Films 602 52 Google Scholar
[62]	Chen Y B 2009 Opt. Express 17 3130 Google Scholar
[63]	Zheng H, Jia J F 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 067403 Google Scholar
[64]	高艺璇, 张礼智, 张余洋, 杜世萱 2018 物理学报 67 238101 Google Scholar Gao Y X, Zhang L Z, Zhang Y Y, Du S X 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 238101 Google Scholar
[65]	Autore M, D'Apuzzo F, Di Gaspare A, Giliberti V, Limaj O, Roy P, Brahlek M, Koirala N, Oh S, García de Abajo F J, Lupi S 2015 Adv. Opt. Mater. 3 1257 Google Scholar
[66]	Qi J, Liu H, Xie X C 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 155420 Google Scholar
[67]	Xu Y, Miotkowski I, Liu C, Tian J, Nam H, Alidoust N, Hu J, Shih C K, Hasan M Z, Chen Y P 2014 Nat. Phys. 10 956 Google Scholar
[68]	Chen H T, Yang H, Singh R, O’Hara J F, Azad A K, Trugman S A, Jia Q X, Taylor A J 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 247402 Google Scholar
[69]	Kurter C, Abrahams J, Shvets G, Anlage S M 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 180510 Google Scholar
[70]	Zheludev N I, Kivshar Y S 2012 Nat. Mater. 11 917 Google Scholar
[71]	Woessner A, Lundeberg M B, Gao Y, Principi A, Alonso-Gonzalez P, Carrega M, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Vignale G, Polini M, Hone J, Hillenbrand R, Koppens F H 2015 Nat. Mater. 14 421 Google Scholar
[72]	Liu R, Liao B, Guo X, Hu D, Hu H, Du L, Yu H, Zhang G, Yang X, Dai Q 2017 Nanoscale 9 208 Google Scholar
[73]	García de Abajo F J 2014 ACS Photon. 1 135 Google Scholar
[74]	Principi A, Vignale G, Carrega M, Polini M 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 195405 Google Scholar
[75]	Bao Q, Loh K 2012 ACS Nano 6 3677 Google Scholar
[76]	Low T, Avouris P 2014 ACS Nano 8 1086 Google Scholar
[77]	Fei Z, Andreev G O, Bao W, Zhang L, McLeod A S, Wang C, Stewart M K, Zhao Z, Dominguez G, Thiemens M, Foger M M, Tauber M J, Castro-Neto A H, Lau C N, Keilmann F, Basov D NJ 2011 Nano Lett. 11 4701 Google Scholar
[78]	Martín-Moreno L, García de Abajo F J, Vidal F J 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 173601 Google Scholar
[79]	Morimoto T, Joung S K, Saito T, Futaba D N, Hata K, Okazaki T 2014 ACS Nano 8 9897 Google Scholar
[80]	Bonaccorso F, Sun Z, Hasan T, Ferrari A C 2010 Nat. Photon. 4 611 Google Scholar
[81]	Castro Neto A H, Guinea F, Peres N M R, Novoselov K S, Geim A K 2009 Rev. Modern Phys. 81 109 Google Scholar
[82]	Lee I H, Yoo D, Avouris P, Low T, Oh S H 2019 Nat. Nanotechnol. 14 313 Google Scholar
[83]	Guo Q, Li C, Deng B, Yuan S, Guinea F, Xia F 2017 ACS Photon. 4 2989 Google Scholar
[84]	Fang Z, Thong S, Schlather A, Liu Z, Ma L, Wang Y, Ajayan P M, Nordlander P, Halas N, Abajo F 2013 ACS Nano 7 2388 Google Scholar
[85]	Nikitin A Y, Guinea F, Martin-Moreno L 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 151119 Google Scholar
[86]	Gan C, Chu H, Li E 2012 Phys. Rev. B 12 125431
[87]	Hwang E H, Das Sarma S 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 205405 Google Scholar
[88]	Farmer D B, Rodrigo D, Low T, Avouris P 2015 Nano Lett. 15 2582 Google Scholar
[89]	Hu H, Liao B, Guo X, Hu D, Qiao X, Liu N, Liu R, Chen K, Bai B, Yang X, Dai Q 2017 Small 13 160302 Google Scholar
[90]	Hu H, Guo X, Hu D, Sun Z, Yang X, Dai Q 2018 Adv Sci 5 1800175 Google Scholar
[91]	Chen S, Autore M, Li J, Li P, Alonso-Gonzalez P, Yang Z, Martin-Moreno L, Hillenbrand R, Nikitin A Y 2017 ACS Photon. 4 3089 Google Scholar
[92]	Beutler H 1935 Zeitschrift für Physik 93 177 Google Scholar
[93]	Fano U 1961 Phys. Rev. 124 1866 Google Scholar
[94]	Guo X, Hu H, Liao B, Zhu X, Yang X, Dai Q 2018 Nanotechnology 29 184004 Google Scholar
[95]	Liu X, Cheng S, Liu H, Hu S, Zhang D, Ning H 2012 Sensors (Basel) 12 9635 Google Scholar
[96]	Hodgkinson J, Tatam R P 2013 Measur. Sci. Technol. 24 012004 Google Scholar
[97]	Liu N, Tang M L, Hentschel M, Giessen H, Alivisatos A P 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 631 Google Scholar
[98]	Farmer D B, Avouris P, Li Y, Heinz T F, Han S J 2016 ACS Photon. 3 553 Google Scholar
[99]	Liu F, Cubukcu E 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 115439 Google Scholar
[100]	Slavík R, Homola J 2007 Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 123 10 Google Scholar
[101]	Cheng H, Chen S, Yu P, Duan X, Xie B, Tian J 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 203112 Google Scholar
[102]	Pan M, Liang Z, Wang Y, Chen Y 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 29984 Google Scholar
[103]	Du X, Skachko I, Barker A, Andrei E Y 2008 Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 491 Google Scholar

施引文献

图 1 典型的表面等离激元材料及其相应的等离激元响应　等离激元损耗取决于等离子体响应频段和载流子迁移率; TI, 拓扑绝缘体; 图中描述了金属(Au, Ag, Al, K, Na, Al; Pt, Pb, Pd和Ti)、超导体(YBa₂Cu₃O_7－d)、石墨烯、拓扑绝缘体(HgTe和Bi₂Se₃), 以及各种半导体(In₂O₃/SnO, ZnO, Ge, Si, III-V族, 和SiC)的载流子迁移率、等离子体响应频段; 图上方给出了石墨烯、半导体和金属天线的典型尺寸, 并绘制了这些材料的等离激元天线尺寸与辐射损耗之间的关系^[3]

Fig. 1. Typical plasmonic materials and their corresponding plasmonic responses^[3]. The plasmon damping largely depends on the plasma frequency and carrier mobility. TI, topological insulator. We present parameters for metals (Au, Ag, Al, K, Na; Au, Ag, Cu, Na, Al; Pt, Pb, Pd, and Ti), a superconductor (YBa₂Cu₃O_7－d), graphene, two TIs (HgTe and Bi₂Se₃), and various semiconductors (In₂O₃/SnO, ZnO, Ge, Si, III–V’s, and SiC). The relationship between the size of a dipole plasmon antenna made of these materials and radiative damping is schematically plotted in the upper part. Typical antenna sizes of graphene, semiconductor, and metals are indicated.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 (a)石墨烯能带三维结构^[81]; (b)石墨烯等离激元与金属等离激元色散关系对比^[83]

Fig. 2. (a) Three-dimensional energy band structure of graphene^[81]; (b) comparison of dispersion relation between graphene plasmon and metal plasmon^[83].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 石墨烯等离激元性质　(a)石墨烯等离激元高光场束缚, 石墨烯与金的近场强度束缚的百分比随纳米结构空间距离d变化的关系^[25]; (b)石墨烯等离激元低本征损耗, 固定光子能量$ \hbar\omega_{\rm ph}$下, 石墨烯本征狄拉克等离激元的寿命τ_p与电子浓度n的关系^[74]; (c)石墨烯等离激元宽光谱响应, 不同石墨烯圆盘直径的等离激元响应^[84]; (d) SiO₂基底上不同条带宽度的石墨烯的消光光谱, 垂直虚线表示石墨烯光学声子频率^[19]; (e), (f) CaF₂基底栅压和条带宽度对石墨烯等离激元的调控^[24]; (g)直接堆叠的1层、2层和3层石墨烯纳米条带对应的等离激元消光谱线^[88]

Fig. 3. Graphene plasmon: (a) High field confinement, percentage of space-integrated near-field intensity confined within a volume extending a distance d outside the nanoantenna^[25]; (b) low damping, the intrinsic Dirac plasmon lifetime τ_p is plotted as a function of electron density n and for a fixed photon energy $ \hbar\omega_{\rm ph}$^[74]; (c) broad spectral response, the graphene plasmon response by changing the diameter of graphene flakes^[84]; (d)−(g) tunability; (d) extinction spectra of graphene with different strip widths of SiO₂ substrate, vertical dashed lines indicate graphene optical phonon frequencies^[19]; (e), (f) CaF₂ substrates, gate voltage and strip width control of graphene plasmons^[24]; (g) extinction spectrum of directly stacked 1 layer, 2 layers and 3 layers of graphene corresponding to the plasmon^[88].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 分子红外指纹区增强探测　(a)石墨烯等离激元增强红外生物探测蛋白质^[25]; (b)红外指纹区增强探测PEO分子振动模式^[24]; (c)柔性云母基底石墨烯红外传感器^[90]; (d), (e)声学石墨烯等离激元增强红外探测^[91,82]; (f)悬空石墨烯红外窗片^[89]

Fig. 4. (a) Graphene plasmon-enhanced infrared bio-sensing of protein^[25]; (b) infrared fingerprint region enhanced detection of PEO vibration modes^[24]; (c) flexible mica based graphene infrared sensor^[90]; (d), (e) acoustic graphene plasmon enhanced infrared detection^[91,82]; (f) suspended graphene to be infrared window^[89].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 气体识别　(a)金属等离激元检测氢气^[97]; (b)石墨烯等离激元红外传感器探测丙酮和己烷气体^[98]; (c)基于石墨烯等离激元的红外传感器对气体的无标记识别^[27]

Fig. 5. (a) Metal plasmon detection of hydrogen^[97]; (b) graphene plasmon infrared sensor for the detection of acetone and hexane vapor^[98]; (c) label-free identification of gas by infrared sensors based on graphene plasmon^[27].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 分子振动全方向识别　(a)石墨烯等离激元全方向传感能力^[99]; (b)石墨烯等离激元灵敏识别hBN面内及面外振动模式^[24]

Fig. 6. (a) Graphene plasmon omnidirectional sensing capability^[99]; (b) graphene plasmons sensitively identify the in-plane and out-of-plane vibration modes of hBN^[24].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 折射率传感　(a)石墨烯等离激元对不同折射率覆盖物的反射率^[28]; (b) Ag-石墨烯杂化结构折射率传感^[102]; (c)具有H, T和HC高阶模式的石墨烯Fano超材料结构的透射光谱和Fano高阶模式对不同分析物(由折射率标记)的折射率传感^[29]

Fig. 7. Refractive index sensing: (a) Reflectance from the structure for different values of the refractive index on top of the graphene^[28]; (b) Ag-graphene hybrid structure for refractive index sensing^[102]; (c) the transmission spectra of the Fano metamaterials with H, T, and HC order modes and simulated transmission spectra of the HC Fano resonance mode with different analyte (marked by refractive indices)^[29].

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 比较红外等离激元材料金属、半导体、超导体、拓扑绝缘体、石墨烯及碳纳米管的载流子迁移率、可调性、局域能力以及传输距离; 等离激元波矢可以表示为q = q'+ iq'', q'为等离激元波矢实部, q''为等离激元波矢虚部; λ_p为等离激元波长, $ {\lambda _{\rm{p}}} = 2{\text{π}} /q' $; 局域能力λ_IR/λ_p, λ_IR为自由空间光波长; 品质因子Q = q'/q''^[30]

Table 1. Comparing carrier mobility, adjustability, confinement ratio, and propagation length of SEIRA materials (metal, semiconductor, superconductor, topological insulator, graphene, and carbon nanotube). Plasmon wave vector q = q'+ iq'', the real part q' is used to define plasmon wavelength $ {\lambda _{\rm{p}}} = 2{\text{π}} /q' $, and the imagine part q'' is used to define propagation length L_p=1/(2q''). Confinement ratio = λ_IR/λ_p, λ_IR free space wavelength, and quality factorQ = q'/q''^[30]

红外表面等离激元材料	载流子迁移率cm²/(V·s)	可调性	局域能力λ_IR/λ_p	品质因子
金属(如Au, Ag)^[31,32]	～10⁰—10^{2 [33]}	电学不可调	< 5^[34]	< 36^[30]
半导体(如Ge, ITO)^[35,36]	～10⁰—10^3[36]	电学可调	< 10^[30]	< 37^[30]
超导体(如FeSe)^[37,38]	～10^4[39]*	电学可调	—	—
拓扑绝缘体(如Bi₂Se₃)^[40,41]	～10^4[42]	电学可调	< 900^[41,43]	3^[43]
石墨烯^[30,31]	～10³—10^5[30]	电学可调	～40—220^{[7,18,30,34,43]}	< 130*^[30]
碳纳米管^[44,45]	～10³—10^{4 [46]}	电学可调	～100—1000^[47]	< 26^[47,48]
注: *表示低温.

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 不同波段的石墨烯等离激元性质比较

Table 2. Properties of graphene plasmon in different plasmon wavelength.

石墨烯等离激元
等离激元响应波段	近红外(0.7—2.5 μm)	中红外(2.5—25 μm)	远红外及太赫兹(> 25 μm)
能否激发	否	能	能
尺寸	—	～100 nm	～1 μm
本征寿命	—	～20—120 ps^a	～0—40 ns^a
局域能力	—	～40—220^b	< 50^c
注: a摘自文献[74]; b摘自文献[7,17,43]; c摘自文献[76,77].

下载: 导出CSV

[1]	Magazu S, Calabro E 2011 J. Phys. Chem. B 115 6818 Google Scholar
[2]	Brar V W, Jang M S, Sherrott M, Lopez J J, Atwater H A 2013 Nano Lett. 13 2541 Google Scholar
[3]	Yang X, Sun Z, Low T, Hu H, Guo X, Garcia de Abajo F J, Avouris P, Dai Q 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 e1704896 Google Scholar
[4]	Zhang G, Huang S, Chaves A, Song C, Ozcelik V O, Low T, Yan H 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 14071 Google Scholar
[5]	Li P, Dolado I, Alfaro-Mozaz F J, CasanovaF, Hueso L E, Liu S, Edgar J H, Nikitin A, Vélez S, Hillenbrand R 2018 Science 359 892 Google Scholar
[6]	Li Y, Yan H, Farmer D B, Meng X, Zhu W, Osgood R M, Heinz T F, Avouris P 2014 Nano Lett. 14 1573 Google Scholar
[7]	Low T, Chaves A, Caldwell J D, Kumar A, Fang N X, Avouris P, Heinz T F, Guinea F, Martin-Moreno L, Koppens F 2017 Nat. Mater. 16 182 Google Scholar
[8]	Hartstein A, Kirtley J R, Tsang J C 1980 Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 201 Google Scholar
[9]	Yanik A A, Huang M, Kamohara O, Artar A, Geisbert T W, Connor J H, Altug H 2010 Nano Lett. 10 4962 Google Scholar
[10]	Rodrigo D, Tittl A, Limaj O, Abajo F J G, Pruneri V, Altug H 2017 Light Sci. Appl. 6 e16277 Google Scholar
[11]	Yan H, Li X, Chandra B, Tulevski G, Wu Y, Freitag M, Zhu W, Avouris P, Xia F 2012 Nat. Nanotechnol. 7 330 Google Scholar
[12]	Liao B, Guo X, Hu H, Liu N, Chen K, Yang X, Dai Q 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 094101 Google Scholar
[13]	Grigorenko A N, Polini M, Novoselov K S 2012 Nat. Photon. 6 749 Google Scholar
[14]	杨晓霞, 孔祥天, 戴庆 2015 物理学报 64 106801 Google Scholar Yang X X, Kong X T, Dai Q 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 106801 Google Scholar
[15]	Hwang E H, Das Sarma S 2007 Phys. Rev. B 75 205418 Google Scholar
[16]	Ju L, Geng B, Horng J, Girit C, Martin M, Hao Z, Bechtel H A, Liang X, Zettl A, Shen Y R, Wang F 2011 Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 630 Google Scholar
[17]	Chen J, Badioli M, Alonso-González P, Thongrattanasiri S, Huth F, Osmond J, Spasenović M, Centeno A, Pesquera A, Godignon P, Zurutuza Elorza A, Camara N, García de Abajo F J, Hillenbrand R, Koppens F H L 2012 Nature 487 77 Google Scholar
[18]	Fei Z, Rodin A S, Andreev G O, Bao W, McLeod A S, Wagner M, Zhang L M, Zhao Z, Thiemens M, Dominguez G, Fogler M M, Castro Neto A H, Lau C N, Keilmann F, Basov D N 2012 Nature 487 82 Google Scholar
[19]	Yan H, Low T, Zhu W, Wu Y, Freitag M, Li X, Guinea F, Avouris P, Xia F 2013 Nat. Photon. 7 394 Google Scholar
[20]	Wang J, Hernandez Y, Lotya M, Coleman J N, Blau W J 2009 Adv. Mater. 21 2430 Google Scholar
[21]	Liu M, Yin X, Ulin-Avila E, Geng B, Zentgraf T, Ju L, Wang F, Zhang X 2011 Nature 474 64 Google Scholar
[22]	Ye L, Sui K, Zhang Y, Liu Q H 2019 Nanoscale 11 3229 Google Scholar
[23]	Zhu A Y, Cubukcu E 2015 2D Mater. 2 032005 Google Scholar
[24]	Hu H, Yang X, Zhai F, Hu D, Liu R, Liu K, Sun Z, Dai Q 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 12334 Google Scholar
[25]	Rodrigo D, Limaj O, Janner D, Etezadi D, García de Abajo F J, Pruneri V, Altug H 2015 Science 349 165 Google Scholar
[26]	Wu C, Liu N, Hu H, Guo X, Liao B, Liu J, Wang L, Chen C, Yang X, Dai Q 2019 Chin. Opt. Lett. 6 062401 Google Scholar
[27]	Hu H, Yang X, Guo X, Khaliji K, Biswas S R, Garcia de Abajo F J, Low T, Sun Z, Dai Q 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 1131 Google Scholar
[28]	Wenger T, Viola G, Kinaret J, Fogelström M, Tassin P 2017 2D Mater. 4 025103 Google Scholar
[29]	Guo X, Hu H, Zhu X, Yang X, Dai Q 2017 Nanoscale 9 14998 Google Scholar
[30]	Ni G X, McLeod A S, Sun Z, Wang L, Xiong L, Post K W, Sunku S S, Jiang B Y, Hone J, Dean C R, Fogler M M, Basov D N 2018 Nature 557 530 Google Scholar
[31]	Jablan M, Buljan H, Soljačić M 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 245435 Google Scholar
[32]	Liu J P, Zhai X, Wang L L, Li H J, Xie F, Xia S X, Shang X J, Luo X 2016 Opt. Express 24 5376 Google Scholar
[33]	Reale C 1974 J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 4 2218 Google Scholar
[34]	Basov D N, Fogler M M, Garcia de Abajo F J 2016 Science 354 6309 Google Scholar
[35]	Soref R, Peale R E, Buchwald W 2008 Opt. Express 16 6507 Google Scholar
[36]	Naik G V, Shalaev V M, Boltasseva A 2013 Adv. Mater. 25 3264 Google Scholar
[37]	Ueno K, Nakamura S, Shimotani H, Yuan H T, Kimura N, Nojima T, Aoki H, Iwasa Y, Kawasaki M 2011 Nat. Nanotechnol. 6 408 Google Scholar
[38]	Tassin P, Koschny T, Kafesaki M, Soukoulis C M 2012 Nat. Photon. 6 259 Google Scholar
[39]	Huynh K K, Tanabe Y, Urata T, Oguro H, Heguri S, Watanabe K, Tanigaki K 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90 144516 Google Scholar
[40]	Yuan J, Ma W, Zhang L, Lu Y, Zhao M, Guo H, Zhao J, Yu W, Zhang Y, Zhang K, Hoh H Y, Li X, Loh K P, Li S, Qiu C W, Bao Q 2017 ACS Photon. 4 3055 Google Scholar
[41]	Deshko Y, Krusin-Elbaum L, Menon V, Khanikaev A, Trevino J 2016 Opt. Express 24 7398 Google Scholar
[42]	Butch N P, Kirshenbaum K, Syers P, Sushkov A B, Jenkins G S, Drew H D, Paglione J 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 241301 Google Scholar
[43]	Alcaraz Iranzo D, Nanot S, Dias E J C, Epstein I, Peng C, Efetov D K, Lundeberg M B, Parret R, Osmond J, Hong J Y, Kong J, Englund D R, Peres N M R, Koppens F H L 2018 Science 360 291 Google Scholar
[44]	Chiu K C, Falk A L, Ho P H, Farmer D B, Tulevski G, Lee Y H, Avouris P, Han S J 2017 Nano Lett. 17 5641 Google Scholar
[45]	Hartmann N, Piredda G, Berthelot J, Colas des Francs G, Bouhelier A, Hartschuh A 2012 Nano Lett. 12 177 Google Scholar
[46]	Javey A, Kim H, Brink M, Wang Q, Ural A, Guo J, McIntyre P, McEuen P, Lundstrom M, Dai H 2002 Nat. Mater. 1 241 Google Scholar
[47]	Shi Z, Hong X, Bechtel H A, Zeng B, Martin M C, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Shen Y R, Wang F 2015 Nat. Photon. 9 515 Google Scholar
[48]	Falk A L, Chiu K C, Farmer D B, Cao Q, Tersoff J, Lee Y H, Avouris P, Han S J 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 257401 Google Scholar
[49]	王文慧, 张孬 2018 物理学报 67 247302 Google Scholar Wang W, Zhang N 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 247302 Google Scholar
[50]	Li Z, Yu X, Fu X, Hao Z, Li K 2008 Chin. Phys. Lett. 25 1776 Google Scholar
[51]	Kundu J, Le F, Nordlander P, Halas N J 2008 Chem. Phys. Lett. 452 115 Google Scholar
[52]	Brown L V, Yang X, Zhao K, Zheng B Y, Nordlander P, Halas N J 2015 Nano Lett. 15 1272 Google Scholar
[53]	Willets K A, van Duyne R P 2007 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 58 267 Google Scholar
[54]	Schaadt D M, Feng B, Yu E T 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 063106 Google Scholar
[55]	Mulvaney P 1996 Langmuir 12 788 Google Scholar
[56]	El-Sayed K S, El-Sayed M A 2006 J. Phys. Chem. B 110 19220 Google Scholar
[57]	Nikitin A Y, Guinea F, Garcia-Vidal F J, Martin-Moreno L 2012 Phys. Rev. B 85 081405 Google Scholar
[58]	Huang Y W, Lee H W H, Sokhoyan R, Pala R A, Thyagarajan K, Han S, Tsai D P, Atwater H A 2016 Nano Lett. 16 5319 Google Scholar
[59]	Baldassarre L, Sakat E, Frigerio J, Samarelli A, Gallacher K, Calandrini E, Isella G, Paul D J, Ortolani M, Biagioni P 2015 Nano Lett. 15 7225 Google Scholar
[60]	Abb M, Wang Y, Papasimakis N, de Groot C H, Muskens O L 2014 Nano Lett. 14 346 Google Scholar
[61]	Samarelli A, Frigerio J, Sakat E, Baldassarre L, Gallacher K, Finazzi M, Isella G, Ortolani M, Biagioni P, Paul D J 2016 Thin Solid Films 602 52 Google Scholar
[62]	Chen Y B 2009 Opt. Express 17 3130 Google Scholar
[63]	Zheng H, Jia J F 2019 Chin. Phys. B 28 067403 Google Scholar
[64]	高艺璇, 张礼智, 张余洋, 杜世萱 2018 物理学报 67 238101 Google Scholar Gao Y X, Zhang L Z, Zhang Y Y, Du S X 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 238101 Google Scholar
[65]	Autore M, D'Apuzzo F, Di Gaspare A, Giliberti V, Limaj O, Roy P, Brahlek M, Koirala N, Oh S, García de Abajo F J, Lupi S 2015 Adv. Opt. Mater. 3 1257 Google Scholar
[66]	Qi J, Liu H, Xie X C 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 155420 Google Scholar
[67]	Xu Y, Miotkowski I, Liu C, Tian J, Nam H, Alidoust N, Hu J, Shih C K, Hasan M Z, Chen Y P 2014 Nat. Phys. 10 956 Google Scholar
[68]	Chen H T, Yang H, Singh R, O’Hara J F, Azad A K, Trugman S A, Jia Q X, Taylor A J 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 247402 Google Scholar
[69]	Kurter C, Abrahams J, Shvets G, Anlage S M 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 180510 Google Scholar
[70]	Zheludev N I, Kivshar Y S 2012 Nat. Mater. 11 917 Google Scholar
[71]	Woessner A, Lundeberg M B, Gao Y, Principi A, Alonso-Gonzalez P, Carrega M, Watanabe K, Taniguchi T, Vignale G, Polini M, Hone J, Hillenbrand R, Koppens F H 2015 Nat. Mater. 14 421 Google Scholar
[72]	Liu R, Liao B, Guo X, Hu D, Hu H, Du L, Yu H, Zhang G, Yang X, Dai Q 2017 Nanoscale 9 208 Google Scholar
[73]	García de Abajo F J 2014 ACS Photon. 1 135 Google Scholar
[74]	Principi A, Vignale G, Carrega M, Polini M 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 195405 Google Scholar
[75]	Bao Q, Loh K 2012 ACS Nano 6 3677 Google Scholar
[76]	Low T, Avouris P 2014 ACS Nano 8 1086 Google Scholar
[77]	Fei Z, Andreev G O, Bao W, Zhang L, McLeod A S, Wang C, Stewart M K, Zhao Z, Dominguez G, Thiemens M, Foger M M, Tauber M J, Castro-Neto A H, Lau C N, Keilmann F, Basov D NJ 2011 Nano Lett. 11 4701 Google Scholar
[78]	Martín-Moreno L, García de Abajo F J, Vidal F J 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 173601 Google Scholar
[79]	Morimoto T, Joung S K, Saito T, Futaba D N, Hata K, Okazaki T 2014 ACS Nano 8 9897 Google Scholar
[80]	Bonaccorso F, Sun Z, Hasan T, Ferrari A C 2010 Nat. Photon. 4 611 Google Scholar
[81]	Castro Neto A H, Guinea F, Peres N M R, Novoselov K S, Geim A K 2009 Rev. Modern Phys. 81 109 Google Scholar
[82]	Lee I H, Yoo D, Avouris P, Low T, Oh S H 2019 Nat. Nanotechnol. 14 313 Google Scholar
[83]	Guo Q, Li C, Deng B, Yuan S, Guinea F, Xia F 2017 ACS Photon. 4 2989 Google Scholar
[84]	Fang Z, Thong S, Schlather A, Liu Z, Ma L, Wang Y, Ajayan P M, Nordlander P, Halas N, Abajo F 2013 ACS Nano 7 2388 Google Scholar
[85]	Nikitin A Y, Guinea F, Martin-Moreno L 2012 Appl. Phys. Lett. 101 151119 Google Scholar
[86]	Gan C, Chu H, Li E 2012 Phys. Rev. B 12 125431
[87]	Hwang E H, Das Sarma S 2009 Phys. Rev. B 80 205405 Google Scholar
[88]	Farmer D B, Rodrigo D, Low T, Avouris P 2015 Nano Lett. 15 2582 Google Scholar
[89]	Hu H, Liao B, Guo X, Hu D, Qiao X, Liu N, Liu R, Chen K, Bai B, Yang X, Dai Q 2017 Small 13 160302 Google Scholar
[90]	Hu H, Guo X, Hu D, Sun Z, Yang X, Dai Q 2018 Adv Sci 5 1800175 Google Scholar
[91]	Chen S, Autore M, Li J, Li P, Alonso-Gonzalez P, Yang Z, Martin-Moreno L, Hillenbrand R, Nikitin A Y 2017 ACS Photon. 4 3089 Google Scholar
[92]	Beutler H 1935 Zeitschrift für Physik 93 177 Google Scholar
[93]	Fano U 1961 Phys. Rev. 124 1866 Google Scholar
[94]	Guo X, Hu H, Liao B, Zhu X, Yang X, Dai Q 2018 Nanotechnology 29 184004 Google Scholar
[95]	Liu X, Cheng S, Liu H, Hu S, Zhang D, Ning H 2012 Sensors (Basel) 12 9635 Google Scholar
[96]	Hodgkinson J, Tatam R P 2013 Measur. Sci. Technol. 24 012004 Google Scholar
[97]	Liu N, Tang M L, Hentschel M, Giessen H, Alivisatos A P 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 631 Google Scholar
[98]	Farmer D B, Avouris P, Li Y, Heinz T F, Han S J 2016 ACS Photon. 3 553 Google Scholar
[99]	Liu F, Cubukcu E 2013 Phys. Rev. B 88 115439 Google Scholar
[100]	Slavík R, Homola J 2007 Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 123 10 Google Scholar
[101]	Cheng H, Chen S, Yu P, Duan X, Xie B, Tian J 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 203112 Google Scholar
[102]	Pan M, Liang Z, Wang Y, Chen Y 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 29984 Google Scholar
[103]	Du X, Skachko I, Barker A, Andrei E Y 2008 Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 491 Google Scholar

[1]	张逸飞, 刘媛, 梅家栋, 王军转, 王肖沐, 施毅. 基于纳米金属阵列天线的石墨烯/硅近红外探测器. 物理学报, 2024, 73(6): 064202. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231657
[2]	葛浩楠, 谢润章, 郭家祥, 李庆, 余羿叶, 何家乐, 王芳, 王鹏, 胡伟达. 人工微纳结构增强长波及甚长波红外探测器. 物理学报, 2022, 71(11): 110703. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220380
[3]	邱子阳, 陈岩, 邱祥冈. 拓扑材料BaMnSb₂的红外光谱学研究. 物理学报, 2022, 71(10): 107201. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220011
[4]	邱梓恒, AhmedYousif Ghazal, 龙金友, 张嵩. 三乙胺分子构象与红外光谱的理论研究. 物理学报, 2022, 71(10): 103601. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220123
[5]	赵星, 郝祺, 倪振华, 邱腾. 单分子表面增强拉曼散射的光谱特性及分析方法. 物理学报, 2021, 70(13): 137401. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201447
[6]	赵承祥, 郄媛, 余耀, 马荣荣, 秦俊飞, 刘彦. 等离激元增强的石墨烯光吸收. 物理学报, 2020, 69(6): 067801. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191645
[7]	许兵, 邱子阳, 杨润, 戴耀民, 邱祥冈. 拓扑半金属的红外光谱研究. 物理学报, 2019, 68(22): 227804. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191510
[8]	林桐, 胡蝶, 时立宇, 张思捷, 刘妍琦, 吕佳林, 董涛, 赵俊, 王楠林. 铁基超导体Li0.8Fe0.2ODFeSe的红外光谱研究. 物理学报, 2018, 67(20): 207102. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181401
[9]	陈浩, 张晓霞, 王鸿, 姬月华. 基于磁激元效应的石墨烯-金属纳米结构近红外吸收研究. 物理学报, 2018, 67(11): 118101. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180196
[10]	邓红梅, 黄磊, 李静, 陆叶, 李传起. 基于石墨烯加载的不对称纳米天线对的表面等离激元单向耦合器. 物理学报, 2017, 66(14): 145201. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.145201
[11]	王安静, 方勇华, 李大成, 崔方晓, 吴军, 刘家祥, 李扬裕, 赵彦东. 面阵探测下的污染云团红外光谱仿真. 物理学报, 2017, 66(11): 114203. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.114203
[12]	张超杰, 周婷, 杜鑫鹏, 王同标, 刘念华. 利用石墨烯等离激元与表面声子耦合增强量子摩擦. 物理学报, 2016, 65(23): 236801. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.236801
[13]	盛世威, 李康, 孔繁敏, 岳庆炀, 庄华伟, 赵佳. 基于石墨烯纳米带的齿形表面等离激元滤波器的研究. 物理学报, 2015, 64(10): 108402. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.108402
[14]	曾婷婷, 李鹏程, 周效信. 两束同色激光场和中红外场驱动氦原子在等离激元中产生的单个阿秒脉冲. 物理学报, 2014, 63(20): 203201. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.203201
[15]	尹海峰, 张红, 岳莉. C60富勒烯二聚物的等离激元激发. 物理学报, 2014, 63(12): 127303. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.127303
[16]	厉巧巧, 韩文鹏, 赵伟杰, 鲁妍, 张昕, 谭平恒, 冯志红, 李佳. 缺陷单层和双层石墨烯的拉曼光谱及其激发光能量色散关系. 物理学报, 2013, 62(13): 137801. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.137801
[17]	李鑫, 羊梦诗, 叶志鹏, 陈亮, 徐灿, 储修祥. 甘氨酸色氨酸寡肽链的红外光谱的密度泛函研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(15): 156103. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.156103
[18]	刘晓东, 陶万军, 郑旭光, 萩原雅人, 孟冬冬, 张森林, 郭其新. 磁几何阻挫材料羟基氯化钴的中红外光谱特征. 物理学报, 2011, 60(3): 037803. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.037803
[19]	赵永涛, 张小安, 李福利, 肖国青, 詹文龙, 杨治虎. 高电荷态离子126Xeq+与Ti固体表面作用的激发光谱. 物理学报, 2003, 52(11): 2768-2773. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.2768
[20]	凌志华. 垂直排列液晶盒中反铁电液晶TFMHxPOCBC-D2偏振红外光谱研究. 物理学报, 2001, 50(2): 227-232. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.227

计量

文章访问数: 13439
PDF下载量: 430
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板