搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于紧束缚模型的拓扑物理微波实验验证平台的开发

梅宇涵 邵越 杭志宏

引用本文:
Citation:

基于紧束缚模型的拓扑物理微波实验验证平台的开发

梅宇涵, 邵越, 杭志宏

Microwave experimental platform to demonstrate topology physics based on tight-binding model

Mei Yu-Han, Shao Yue, Hang Zhi-Hong
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 拓扑光子学、拓扑物理与光学的结合, 为凝聚态理论的验证以及新型光学器件的构建提供了新的视角. 紧束缚模型是凝聚态物理的重要研究手段. 我们发现, 将传统光子晶体的背景材料由通常的空气改为有效介电常数为负数的材料之后, 这样的光子晶体和紧束缚模型有一一对应的关系, 可以用于相关理论的验证. 通过数值仿真实验, 在蜂巢晶格负背景光子晶体结构中验证了之字形(zigzag)、胡须型(bearded)等界面态的存在性. 我们提出了两种实验构想, 以期在微波频段开发相应的凝聚态理论验证平台, 为拓扑物理的研究提供全新的工具. 我们也希望, 这些新理论的验证能为今后光学仪器的设计提供崭新思路.
    Topology photonic, a combination of topology physics and optics provides novel visions to the demonstration of theoretical physics and designs principles to new optical devices. Being a key tool to condensed matter physics, tight-binding model helps the development of topology physics. We found that by changing the background material from vacuum to an effective medium with negative permittivity in traditional photonic crystals, a one-to-one correspondence to tight-binding model can be found for this new type of photonic crystal. We show by numerical simulations the existence of edge states located at both the zigzag and bearded boundaries of a honeycomb-lattice photonic crystal imbedded in negative permittivity material. Two experimental realizations are proposed that it is possible to build up a demonstration platform working at microwave frequencies to verify corresponding topology physics theories using simple photonic crystal structures. We hope that the successful verification of new topology physics can further trigger applications in optics.
      通信作者: 杭志宏, zhhang@suda.edu.cn
      Corresponding author: Hang Zhi-Hong, zhhang@suda.edu.cn
    [1]

    Haldane F D M, Raghu S 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 013904Google Scholar

    [2]

    Poo Y, Wu R X, Lin Z, Yang Y, Chan C T 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 093903Google Scholar

    [3]

    Wang Z, Chong Y, Joannopoulos J D, Soljačić M 2009 Nature 461 772Google Scholar

    [4]

    Ashcroft N W, Mermin N D, Solid State Physics, 1976, Thomson Learning Asia Pte Ltd.

    [5]

    Bernevig B A, Hughes T L, Topological insulators and topological superconductors, 2013, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    [6]

    Lu L, Joannopoulos J D, Soljačić M 2016 Nat. Phys. 12 626Google Scholar

    [7]

    Xiao S, Zhong F, Liu H, Zhu S, Li J 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 8360Google Scholar

    [8]

    胡中, 徐涛, 汤蓉, 郭会杰 2019 激光与光电子学进展 56 202408

    Hu Z, Xu T, Tang R, Guo H J 2019 Laser & Optoelectronics Progress 56 202408

    [9]

    Sun S, He Q, Xiao S, Xu Q, Li X, Zhou L 2012 Nat. Mater. 11 426Google Scholar

    [10]

    Joannopoulos J D, Johnson S G, Winn J N, Meade R D, Photonic crystals: molding the flow of light, 2 nd ed. 2008, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    [11]

    Lidorikis E, Sigalas M M, Economou E N, Soukoulis C M 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 1405Google Scholar

    [12]

    Plotnik Y, Rechtsman M C, Song D, Heinrich M, Zeuner J M, Nolte S, Lumer Y, Malkova N, Xu J, Szameit A, Chen Z, Segev M 2014 Nat. Mater. 13 57Google Scholar

    [13]

    Pendry J B, Holden A J, Stewart W J, Youngs I 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 4773Google Scholar

    [14]

    Simovski C R, Belov P A, Atrashchenko A V, Kivshar Y S 2012 Adv. Mater. 24 4229Google Scholar

    [15]

    Belov P A, Marques R, Maslovski S I, Nefedov I S, Silveirinha M, Simovski C R, Tretyakov S A 2003 Phys. Rev. B 67 113103Google Scholar

    [16]

    Wang B, Cappelli M A 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 161101Google Scholar

    [17]

    Wang B, Cappelli M A 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 171107Google Scholar

    [18]

    Skirlo S, Lu L, Igarashi L, Yan Q, Joannopoulos J D, Soljačić M 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 253901Google Scholar

    [19]

    Khanikaev A B 2013 Nat. Mater. 12 233Google Scholar

    [20]

    Ye L, Yang Y, Hang Z H, Qiu C, Liu Z 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 251107Google Scholar

    [21]

    Yang Y, Xu Y F, Xu T, Wang H, Jiang J, Hu X, Hang Z H 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 217401Google Scholar

    [22]

    He X, Liang E, Yuan J, Qiu H, Chen X, Zhao F, Dong J 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 872Google Scholar

  • 图 1  二维类石墨烯光子晶体结构示意图, 其蜂巢晶格原胞用红线标记. y轴方向上11个介质柱构成一个超原胞, 沿着x轴无限周期排列. 介质柱阵列的S1边界为之字形(zigzag)界面, S2为胡须形(bearded)界面, 介质柱半径r = 0.2a, a是蜂巢晶格的晶格常数

    Fig. 1.  The structure of a honeycomb-lattice graphene-like photonic crystal. Its honeycomb unit cell is indicated in red. A ribbon of 11 dielectric cylinders along the y direction is considered and it is periodically arranged in the x direction. The photonic crystal ribbon has zigzag (S1), bearded (S2) edges. The radius of cylinders shown here is r = 0.2a, where a is the lattice constant.

    图 2  (a)六角光子晶体最低的两条能带, 在布里渊区边界K点因为蜂巢晶格对称性具有狄拉克点. Band 0 对应了x = –10, y = 0.2, z = 8.5的能带, 即初始条件. Band x, y, z 在保持另两个初始值不变时, 改变了x = –5 (band x), y = 0.18 (band y), z = 10 (band z); (b) 左侧band (x = –20, y = 0.2, z = 8.5)和右侧band (x = –15, y = 0.18, z = 8.5) 对比了COMSOL计算的能带(点)以及用(5)式和(6)式拟合的紧束缚模型计算得到的能带(三角形)

    Fig. 2.  (a) A Dirac cone dispersion appears at K point for the lowest two photonic bands of the honeycomb photonic crystal structure we studied. Band 0 represents the band diagram when x = –10, y = 0.2, z = 8.5; Band x, y and z correspond to the situations that only one parameter from that of band 0 is changed: x = –5 (band x), y = 0.18 (band y), z = 10 (band z); (b) the comparison between calculated lowest two photonic bulk bands of band left (x = –20, y = 0.2, z = 8.5) and band right (x = –15, y = 0.18, z = 8.5) (in red dots) and corresponding bands calculated with tight-binding model with fitted parameters using equations (5) and (6) (in hollow blue triangles).

    图 3  宽度为11且有一个之字形边界和一个胡须形边界的光子晶体类石墨烯带超原胞, 利用(1)式, (5)式和(6)式的紧束缚模型得到的能带图像(红色)和仿真结果(蓝色)的对比; 其中背景常数x = –20, 占空比y = 0.2, 超原胞如图右下角所示

    Fig. 3.  The energy bands for a honeycomb-graphene-like photonic crystal ribbon (the background constant x = –20, filling ratio y = 0.2). Here we used the equations (1), (5) and (6) to derive the TB solution(red), as simulation results are marked blue. The supercell is depicted in the right-lower corner.

    图 4  利用负背景光子晶体系统数值计算得到的局域在胡须界面上的两个Tamm态, 界面态的色散用红色和体带(蓝色)区分. 此时负背景介电常数为–10, 上体带和下体带各有一Tamm态; 其对应的本征场在下方显示 (a) 下体带; (b) 上体带

    Fig. 4.  Band dispersion (in red dots) of Tamm-like bearded edge states calculated using photonic crystal system with background permittivity ${\epsilon} $ = –10. The bulk bands are in blue dots. Their corresponding eigenfield distributions localized on bearded edge are shown in the lower panels: (a) Lower bands; (b) upper bands.

    图 5  金属柱背景下, 氧化铝蜂窝结构的光子能带(红色), 和其对应的背景替换为有效介质(蓝色)后得到的能带结果符合, 但用紧束缚模型(绿色)计算得到的能带略有差别. 原胞内的大圆代表介质柱, 小圆代表密集插入的细金属柱

    Fig. 5.  In the metallic background, photonic energy bands match well with the bands (Red) calculated with effective background constant (Blue). However, Tight Binding model’s result (Green) shows small variance compared to the real bands. In the schematic cell structure, bigger circle represents dielectric cylinder, while smaller circle represents thin metallic rod inserted.

    表 1  参数和位能以及耦合系数的关系

    Table 1.  Relationship between onsite energy, coupling ratio and parameters.

    Onsite energy ${\epsilon_0} $t
    背景材料介电常数|x|
    晶体柱占空比y
    晶体柱材料介电常数z
    ↑代表正相关, ↓代表负相关; x因为是负值, 所以这里取绝对值讨论.
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Haldane F D M, Raghu S 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 013904Google Scholar

    [2]

    Poo Y, Wu R X, Lin Z, Yang Y, Chan C T 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 093903Google Scholar

    [3]

    Wang Z, Chong Y, Joannopoulos J D, Soljačić M 2009 Nature 461 772Google Scholar

    [4]

    Ashcroft N W, Mermin N D, Solid State Physics, 1976, Thomson Learning Asia Pte Ltd.

    [5]

    Bernevig B A, Hughes T L, Topological insulators and topological superconductors, 2013, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    [6]

    Lu L, Joannopoulos J D, Soljačić M 2016 Nat. Phys. 12 626Google Scholar

    [7]

    Xiao S, Zhong F, Liu H, Zhu S, Li J 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 8360Google Scholar

    [8]

    胡中, 徐涛, 汤蓉, 郭会杰 2019 激光与光电子学进展 56 202408

    Hu Z, Xu T, Tang R, Guo H J 2019 Laser & Optoelectronics Progress 56 202408

    [9]

    Sun S, He Q, Xiao S, Xu Q, Li X, Zhou L 2012 Nat. Mater. 11 426Google Scholar

    [10]

    Joannopoulos J D, Johnson S G, Winn J N, Meade R D, Photonic crystals: molding the flow of light, 2 nd ed. 2008, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    [11]

    Lidorikis E, Sigalas M M, Economou E N, Soukoulis C M 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 1405Google Scholar

    [12]

    Plotnik Y, Rechtsman M C, Song D, Heinrich M, Zeuner J M, Nolte S, Lumer Y, Malkova N, Xu J, Szameit A, Chen Z, Segev M 2014 Nat. Mater. 13 57Google Scholar

    [13]

    Pendry J B, Holden A J, Stewart W J, Youngs I 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 4773Google Scholar

    [14]

    Simovski C R, Belov P A, Atrashchenko A V, Kivshar Y S 2012 Adv. Mater. 24 4229Google Scholar

    [15]

    Belov P A, Marques R, Maslovski S I, Nefedov I S, Silveirinha M, Simovski C R, Tretyakov S A 2003 Phys. Rev. B 67 113103Google Scholar

    [16]

    Wang B, Cappelli M A 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 161101Google Scholar

    [17]

    Wang B, Cappelli M A 2015 Appl. Phys. Lett. 107 171107Google Scholar

    [18]

    Skirlo S, Lu L, Igarashi L, Yan Q, Joannopoulos J D, Soljačić M 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 253901Google Scholar

    [19]

    Khanikaev A B 2013 Nat. Mater. 12 233Google Scholar

    [20]

    Ye L, Yang Y, Hang Z H, Qiu C, Liu Z 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 251107Google Scholar

    [21]

    Yang Y, Xu Y F, Xu T, Wang H, Jiang J, Hu X, Hang Z H 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 217401Google Scholar

    [22]

    He X, Liang E, Yuan J, Qiu H, Chen X, Zhao F, Dong J 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 872Google Scholar

  • [1] 王子尧, 陈福家, 郗翔, 高振, 杨怡豪. 非互易拓扑光子学. 物理学报, 2024, 73(6): 064201. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231850
    [2] 隋文杰, 张玉, 张紫瑞, 王小龙, 张洪方, 史强, 杨冰. 拓扑自旋光子晶体中螺旋边界态单向传输调控研究. 物理学报, 2022, 71(19): 194101. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220353
    [3] 周铭杰, 谭海云, 周岩, 诸葛兰剑, 吴雪梅. 一种基于束缚态的可调等离子体光子晶体窄带滤波器. 物理学报, 2021, 70(17): 175201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210241
    [4] 王彦兰, 李妍. 二维介电光子晶体中的赝自旋态与拓扑相变. 物理学报, 2020, 69(9): 094206. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191962
    [5] 方云团, 王张鑫, 范尔盼, 李小雪, 王洪金. 基于结构反转二维光子晶体的拓扑相变及拓扑边界态的构建. 物理学报, 2020, 69(18): 184101. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200415
    [6] 王洪飞, 解碧野, 詹鹏, 卢明辉, 陈延峰. 拓扑光子学研究进展. 物理学报, 2019, 68(22): 224206. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191437
    [7] 贾子源, 杨玉婷, 季立宇, 杭志宏. 类石墨烯复杂晶胞光子晶体中的确定性界面态. 物理学报, 2017, 66(22): 227802. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.227802
    [8] 朱奇光, 董昕宇, 王春芳, 王宁, 陈卫东. 多系双局域态光子晶体的可调谐滤波特性分析. 物理学报, 2015, 64(3): 034209. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.034209
    [9] 陈颖, 范卉青, 卢波. 带多孔硅表面缺陷腔的半无限光子晶体Tamm态及其折射率传感机理. 物理学报, 2014, 63(24): 244207. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.244207
    [10] 彭静, 徐智谋, 吴小峰, 孙堂友. 纳米压印技术制备表面光子晶体LED的研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(3): 036104. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.036104
    [11] 李乾利, 温廷敦, 许丽萍, 王志斌. 单轴应力对一维镜像光子晶体光子局域态透射峰的影响. 物理学报, 2013, 62(18): 184212. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.184212
    [12] 陈依新, 郑婉华, 陈微, 陈良惠, 汤益丹, 沈光地. 表面为二维光子晶体结构的AlGaInP系发光二极管的研究. 物理学报, 2010, 59(11): 8083-8087. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.8083
    [13] 章海锋, 马力, 刘少斌. 磁化等离子体光子晶体缺陷态的研究. 物理学报, 2009, 58(2): 1071-1076. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.1071
    [14] 周仁龙, 陈效双, 曾 勇, 张建标, 陈洪波, 王少伟, 陆 卫, 李宏建, 夏 辉, 王玲玲. 金属光子晶体平板的超强透射及其表面等离子体共振. 物理学报, 2008, 57(6): 3506-3513. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.3506
    [15] 沈晓鹏, 韩 奎, 沈义峰, 李海鹏, 肖正伟, 郑 健. 二维光子晶体中与电磁波偏振态无关的自准直. 物理学报, 2006, 55(6): 2760-2764. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.2760
    [16] 车 明, 周云松, 王福合, 顾本源. 二维正方格子磁性光子晶体的界面传导模. 物理学报, 2005, 54(5): 2096-2101. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.2096
    [17] 李蓉, 任坤, 任晓斌, 周静, 刘大禾. 一维光子晶体带隙结构对不同偏振态的角度和波长响应. 物理学报, 2004, 53(8): 2520-2525. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.2520
    [18] 刘晓东, 王义全, 许兴胜, 程丙英, 张道中. 具有态守恒赝隙的光子晶体中两能级原子自发辐射的增强与抑制. 物理学报, 2004, 53(1): 125-131. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.125
    [19] 刘晓东, 李曙光, 许兴胜, 王义全, 程丙英, 张道中. 用不同密度分布的发光分子探测光子晶体的全态密度. 物理学报, 2004, 53(1): 132-136. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.132
    [20] 刘江涛, 周云松, 王福合, 顾本源. 不同晶格光子晶体异质结的界面传导模. 物理学报, 2004, 53(6): 1845-1849. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.1845
计量
  • 文章访问数:  7150
  • PDF下载量:  238
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-09-24
  • 修回日期:  2019-11-11
  • 上网日期:  2019-11-19
  • 刊出日期:  2019-11-20

/

返回文章
返回