搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

可积谐振系统中的极端波事件研究进展

潘昌昌 Baronio Fabio 陈世华

引用本文:
Citation:

可积谐振系统中的极端波事件研究进展

潘昌昌, Baronio Fabio, 陈世华

Recent developments of extreme wave events in integrable resonant systems

Pan Chang-Chang, Baronio Fabio, Chen Shi-Hua
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 从微观角度上讲, 单个极端异常波事件可视为可积模型方程的时空局域有理函数解. 本文主要讨论了三类典型的可积谐振相互作用模型(即长波短波谐振方程, 三波谐振相互作用方程, 非线性薛定谔和麦克斯韦-布洛赫方程)的基阶Peregrine异常波解及其相关研究进展; 明确指出了这些基阶异常波解形式具有普适性, 可推广应用到多分量或更高阶的可积模型中; 借助数值模拟, 还展示了共存异常波、互补异常波、以及自感应透明Peregrine孤子等新颖动力学.
    From a microscopic perspective, the single extreme rogue wave event can be thought of as the spatiotemporally localized rational solutions of the underlying integrable model. A typical example is the fundamental Peregrine rogue wave, who in general entails a three-fold peak amplitude, while making its peak position arbitrary on a finite continuous-wave background. This kind of bizarre wave structure agrees well with the fleeting nature of realistic rogue waves and has been confirmed experimentally, first in nonlinear fibers, then in water wave tanks and plasmas, and recently in an irregular oceanic sea state. In this review, with a brief overview of the current state of the art of the concepts, methods, and research trends related to rogue wave events, we mainly discuss the fundamental Peregrine rogue wave solutions as well as their recent progress, intended for three typical integrable models, namely, the long-wave short-wave resonant equation, the three-wave resonant interaction equation, and the nonlinear Schrödinger and Maxwell–Bloch equation. Basically, while the first two models can describe the resonant interaction among optical waves, the latter governs the interaction between the optical waves and the resonant medium. For each integrable model, we present explicitly its Lax pair, Darboux transformation formulas, and fundamental Peregrine rogue wave solutions, in a self-consistent way. We confirm by convincing examples that these fundamental rogue wave solutions exhibit universality and can be applied to the multi-component or the higher-order versions of the current integrable models. By means of numerical simulations, we demonstrate as well several novel rogue wave dynamics such as coexisting rogue waves, complementary rogue waves, and Peregrine solitons of self-induced transparency.
      通信作者: 陈世华, cshua@seu.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 11474051, 11974075)资助的课题
      Corresponding author: Chen Shi-Hua, cshua@seu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11474051, 11974075)
    [1]

    Kharif C, Pelinovsky E, Slunyaev A 2009 Rogue Waves in the Ocean (Berlin: Springer)

    [2]

    Dysthe K, Krogstad H E, Müller P 2008 Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40 287Google Scholar

    [3]

    Akhmediev N, Pelinovsky E 2010 Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 185 1Google Scholar

    [4]

    Lawton G 2001 New Scientist 170 28

    [5]

    Pisarchik A N, Jaimes-Reátegui R, Sevilla-Escoboza R, Huerta-Cuellar G, Taki M 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 274101Google Scholar

    [6]

    Onorato M, Resitori S, Baronio F (ed) 2016 Rogue and Shock Waves in Nonlinear Dispersive Media (Switzerland: Springer) pp179–203

    [7]

    Wabnitz S (ed) 2017 Nonlinear Guided Wave Optics: A Testbed for Extreme Waves (Bristol: IOP Publishing) Chapt. 11

    [8]

    Dudley J M, Dias F, Erkintalo M, Genty G 2014 Nat. Photonics 8 755Google Scholar

    [9]

    Onorato M, Residori S, Bortolozzo U, Montina A, Arecchi F T 2013 Phys. Rep. 528 47Google Scholar

    [10]

    Moslem W M 2011 Phys. Plasmas 18 032301Google Scholar

    [11]

    Alam M S, Hafez M G, Talukder M R, Ali M Hossain 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 095203Google Scholar

    [12]

    Tsai Y Y, Tsai J Y, Lin I 2016 Nat. Phys. 12 573Google Scholar

    [13]

    Bludov Yu V, Konotop V V, Akhmediev N 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 033610Google Scholar

    [14]

    Wen L, Li L, Li Z D, Song S W, Zhang X F, Liu W M 2011 Eur. Phys. J. D 64 473Google Scholar

    [15]

    张解放, 戴朝卿 2016 物理学报 65 050501Google Scholar

    Zhang J F, Dai C Q 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 050501Google Scholar

    [16]

    Liu C, Yang Z Y, Zhao L C, Yang W L, Yue R H 2013 Chin. Phys. Lett. 30 040304Google Scholar

    [17]

    Yan Z Y 2010 Commun. Theor. Phys. 54 947Google Scholar

    [18]

    Chabchoub A, Hoffmann N P, Akhmediev N 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 204502Google Scholar

    [19]

    Akhmediev N, Ankiewicz A, Taki M 2009 Phys. Lett. A 373 675Google Scholar

    [20]

    Solli D R, Ropers C, Koonath P, Jalali B 2007 Nature 450 1054Google Scholar

    [21]

    Lecaplain C, Grelu Ph, Soto-Crespo J M, Akhmediev N 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 233901Google Scholar

    [22]

    Baronio F, Degasperis A, Conforti M, Wabnitz S 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 044102Google Scholar

    [23]

    Chen S, Baronio F, Soto-Crespo J M, Grelu Ph, Mihalache D 2017 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50 463001Google Scholar

    [24]

    Qiu D, He J, Zhang Y, Porsezian K 2015 Proc. R. Soc. A 471 20150236Google Scholar

    [25]

    Peregrine D H 1983 J. Aust. Math. Soc. Ser. B: Appl. Math. 25 16Google Scholar

    [26]

    Shrira V I, Geogjaev V V 2010 J. Eng. Math. 67 11Google Scholar

    [27]

    Kibler B, Fatome J, Finot C, Millot G, Dias F, Genty G, Akhmediev N, Dudley J M 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 790Google Scholar

    [28]

    Bailung H, Sharma S K, Nakamura Y 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 255005Google Scholar

    [29]

    Chabchoub A 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 144103Google Scholar

    [30]

    Walczak P, Randoux S, Suret P 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 143903Google Scholar

    [31]

    Picozzi A, Garnier J, Hansson T, Suret P, Randoux S, Millot G, Christodoulides D N 2014 Phys. Rep. 542 1Google Scholar

    [32]

    Soto-Crespo J M, Devine N, Akhmediev N 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 103901Google Scholar

    [33]

    Baronio F 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 1756Google Scholar

    [34]

    Baronio F, Chen S, Mihalache D 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 3514Google Scholar

    [35]

    Ankiewicz A, Soto-Crespo J M, Chowdhury M A, Akhmediev N 2013 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 30 87Google Scholar

    [36]

    Zhang J F, Jin M Z, He J D, Lou J H, Dai C Q 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 054208Google Scholar

    [37]

    Ma Z Y, Ma S H 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 030507Google Scholar

    [38]

    Chen S, Soto-Crespo J M, Grelu Ph 2014 Opt. Express 22 27632Google Scholar

    [39]

    Guo B L, Ling L M 2011 Chin. Phys. Lett. 28 110202Google Scholar

    [40]

    Baronio F, Conforti M, Degasperis A, Lombardo S 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 114101Google Scholar

    [41]

    Grelu Ph (ed) 2016 Nonlinear Optical Cavity Dynamics: from Microresonators to Fiber Lasers (Weinheim: Wiley-VCH) pp231–316

    [42]

    Grelu Ph, Akhmediev N 2012 Nat. Photonics 6 84Google Scholar

    [43]

    Chen S, Dudley J M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 233903Google Scholar

    [44]

    Akhmediev N, Ankiewicz A 1997 Solitons: Nonlinear Pulses and Beams (London: Chapman and Hall)

    [45]

    Chen S, Liu Y, Mysyrowicz A 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 061806Google Scholar

    [46]

    Guo B, Ling L, Liu Q P 2012 Phys. Rev. E 85 026607Google Scholar

    [47]

    He J S, Zhang H R, Wang L H, Porsezian K, Fokas A S 2013 Phys. Rev. E 87 052914Google Scholar

    [48]

    Wang D S, Zhang D J, Yang J 2010 J. Math. Phys. 51 023510Google Scholar

    [49]

    Wang D S, Wang X 2018 Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 41 334Google Scholar

    [50]

    Chen S, Zhou Y, Baronio F, Mihalache D 2018 Rom. Rep. Phys. 70 102

    [51]

    Akhmediev N, Ankiewicz A, Soto-Crespo J M 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 026601Google Scholar

    [52]

    Ankiewicz A, Soto-Crespo J M, Akhmediev N 2010 Phys. Rev. E 81 046602Google Scholar

    [53]

    Chen S 2013 Phys. Rev. E 88 023202Google Scholar

    [54]

    Soto-Crespo J M, Devine N, Hoffmann N P, Akhmediev N 2014 Phys. Rev. E 90 032902Google Scholar

    [55]

    Chan H N, Chow K W, Kedziora D J, Grimshaw R H J, Ding E 2014 Phys. Rev. E 89 032914Google Scholar

    [56]

    Zhang Y, Guo L, He J, Zhou Z 2015 Lett. Math. Phys. 105 853Google Scholar

    [57]

    He J, Xu S, Porsezian K 2012 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81 124007Google Scholar

    [58]

    Chen S, Song L Y 2014 Phys. Lett. A 378 1228Google Scholar

    [59]

    Xu S, He J, Cheng Y, Porseizan K 2015 Math. Method Appl. Sci. 38 1106Google Scholar

    [60]

    He J, Wang L, Li L, Porsezian K, Erdélyi R 2014 Phys. Rev. E 89 062917Google Scholar

    [61]

    Chen S, Soto-Crespo J M, Baronio F, Grelu Ph, Mihalache D 2016 Opt. Express 24 15251Google Scholar

    [62]

    Zha Q 2013 Phys. Scr. 87 065401Google Scholar

    [63]

    Chen S, Baronio F, Soto-Crespo J M, Liu Y, Grelu Ph 2016 Phys. Rev. E 93 062202Google Scholar

    [64]

    Chen S, Zhou Y, Bu L, Baronio F, Soto-Crespo J M, Mihalache D 2019 Opt. Express 27 11370Google Scholar

    [65]

    Ankiewicz A, Kedziora D J, Chowdury A, Bandelow U, Akhmediev N 2016 Phys. Rev. E 93 012206Google Scholar

    [66]

    Zhang Y, Guo L, Chabchoub A, He J 2017 Rom. J. Phys. 62 102

    [67]

    Chen S, Mihalache D 2015 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 48 215202Google Scholar

    [68]

    Baronio F, Conforti M, Degasperis A, Lombardo S, Onorato M, Wabnitz S 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 034101Google Scholar

    [69]

    Li L, Malomed B A, Mihalache D, Liu W M 2006 Phys. Rew. E 73 066610Google Scholar

    [70]

    Chen S, Song L Y 2013 Phys. Rev. E 87 032910Google Scholar

    [71]

    Li Z D, Huo C Z, Li Q Y, He P B, Xu T F 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 040505Google Scholar

    [72]

    Ye Y, Zhou Y, Chen S, Baronio F, Grelu Ph 2019 Proc. R. Soc. A 475 20180806Google Scholar

    [73]

    Ohta Y, Yang J 2012 Phys. Rev. E 86 036604Google Scholar

    [74]

    Ohta Y, Yang J 2013 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46 105202Google Scholar

    [75]

    Randoux S, Suret P, El G 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 29238Google Scholar

    [76]

    Matveev V B, Salle M A 1991 Darboux Transformation and Solitons (Berlin: Springer)

    [77]

    Hirota R 1973 J. Math. Phys. 14 805Google Scholar

    [78]

    Zhang N, Xia T C, Hu B B 2017 Commun. Theor. Phys. 68 580Google Scholar

    [79]

    Kang Z Z, Xia T C, Ma W X 2019 Adv. Differ. Equ. NY 2019 188Google Scholar

    [80]

    Kang Z Z, Xia T C, Ma W X 2019 Proc. Rom. Acad. A 20 115

    [81]

    Baronio F, Wabnitz S, Kodama Y 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 173901Google Scholar

    [82]

    Baronio F, Chen S, Onorato M, Trillo S, Wabnitz S, Kodama Y 2016 Opt. Lett. 41 5571Google Scholar

    [83]

    Bokaeeyan M, Ankiewicz A, Akhmediev N 2019 Phys. Scr. 94 035203Google Scholar

    [84]

    Mihalache D 2017 Rom. Rep. Phys. 69 403

    [85]

    Malomed B A, Mihalache D 2019 Rom. J. Phys. 64 106

    [86]

    Frisquet B, Kibler B, Morin Ph, Baronio F, Conforti M, Millot G, Wabnitz S 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 20785Google Scholar

    [87]

    Baronio F, Frisquet B, Chen S. Millot G, Wabnitz S, Kibler B 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 013852Google Scholar

    [88]

    Tikan A, Billet C, El G, Tovbis A, Bertola M, Sylvestre T, Gustave F, Randoux S, Genty G, Suret P, Dudley J M 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 033901Google Scholar

    [89]

    Liu W, Zhang Y, He J 2018 Rom. Rep. Phys. 70 106

    [90]

    Chen S, Ye Y, Soto-Crespo J M, Grelu Ph, Baronio F 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 104101Google Scholar

    [91]

    Kibler B, Chabchoub A, Gelash A, Akhmediev N, Zakharov V E 2015 Phys. Rev. X 5 041026Google Scholar

    [92]

    Chen S, Grelu Ph, Soto-Crespo J M 2014 Phys. Rev. E 89 011201Google Scholar

    [93]

    Chen S, Baronio F, Soto-Crespo J M, Grelu Ph, Conforti M, Wabnitz S 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 033847Google Scholar

    [94]

    He J, Xu S, Porseizan K 2012 Phys. Rev. E 86 066603Google Scholar

    [95]

    Chen S, Ye Y, Baronio F, Liu Y, Cai, X M, Grelu Ph 2017 Opt. Express 25 29687Google Scholar

    [96]

    Wang X, Li Y, Huang F, Chen Y 2015 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 20 434Google Scholar

    [97]

    Degasperis A, Wabnitz S, Aceves A B 2015 Phys. Lett. A 379 1067Google Scholar

    [98]

    Guo L, Wang L, Cheng Y, He J 2017 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 52 11Google Scholar

    [99]

    Zakharov V E 1972 Sov. Phys. JETP 35 908

    [100]

    Benney D J 1977 Stud. Appl. Math. 56 81Google Scholar

    [101]

    Djordjevic V D, Redekopp L G 1977 J. Fluid Mech. 79 703Google Scholar

    [102]

    Chowdhury A, Tataronis J A 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 153905Google Scholar

    [103]

    Shats M, Punzmann H, Xia H 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 104503Google Scholar

    [104]

    Chow K W, Chan H N, Kedziora D J, Grimshaw R H J 2013 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82 074001Google Scholar

    [105]

    Chan H N, Grimshaw R H J, Chow K W 2018 Phys. Rev. Fluids 3 124801Google Scholar

    [106]

    Wright III O C 2006 Stud. Appl. Math. 117 71

    [107]

    Chen S 2014 Phys. Lett. A 378 1095Google Scholar

    [108]

    Baronio F, Chen S, Grelu Ph, Wabnitz S, Conforti M 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 033804Google Scholar

    [109]

    Chen S, Soto-Crespo J M, Grelu Ph 2014 Phys. Rev. E 90 033203Google Scholar

    [110]

    Kaup D J, Reiman A, Bers A 1979 Rev. Mod. Phys. 51 275Google Scholar

    [111]

    Ibragimov E, Struthers A 1996 Opt. Lett. 21 1582Google Scholar

    [112]

    Conforti M, Baronio F, Degasperis A, Wabnitz S 2007 Opt. Express 15 12246Google Scholar

    [113]

    Abdolvand A, Nazarkin A, Chugreev A V, Kaminski C F, Russell P St J 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 183902Google Scholar

    [114]

    Picholle E, Montes C, Leycuras C, Legrand O, Botineau J 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 1454Google Scholar

    [115]

    Taranenko Y N, Kazovsky L G 1992 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 4 494Google Scholar

    [116]

    Baronio F, Conforti M, Degasperis A, Wabnitz S 2008 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 44 542Google Scholar

    [117]

    Picozzi A, Haelterman M 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 2010Google Scholar

    [118]

    Malkin V M, Shvets G, Fisch N J 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 4448Google Scholar

    [119]

    Buryak A V, Di Trapani P, Skryabin D V, Trillo S 2002 Phys. Rep. 370 63Google Scholar

    [120]

    Baronio F, Conforti M, De Angelis C, Degasperis A, Andreana M, Couderc V, Barthélémy A 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 113902Google Scholar

    [121]

    Degasperis A, Lombardo S 2006 Physica D 214 157Google Scholar

    [122]

    Chen S, Cai X M, Grelu Ph, Soto-Crespo J M, Wabnitz S, Baronio F 2016 Opt. Express 24 5886Google Scholar

    [123]

    Russell P St J, Culverhouse D, Farahi F 1991 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 27 836Google Scholar

    [124]

    Allen L, Eberly J H 1975 Optical Resonance and Two-Level Atoms (New York: Wiley)

    [125]

    Haus H A 1979 Rev. Mod. Phys. 51 331Google Scholar

    [126]

    McCall S L, Hahn E L 1967 Phys. Rev. Lett. 18 908Google Scholar

    [127]

    Nakazawa M, Yamada E, Kubota H 1991 Phys. Rev. A 44 5973Google Scholar

    [128]

    He J S, Cheng Y, Li Y S 2002 Commun. Theor. Phys. 38 493Google Scholar

    [129]

    Li C, He J, Porsezian K 2013 Phys. Rev. E 87 012913Google Scholar

    [130]

    Conforti M, Baronio F 2011 Eur. Phys. J. D 64 115Google Scholar

    [131]

    Wu C F, Grimshaw R H J, Chow K W, Chan H N 2015 Chaos 25 103113Google Scholar

    [132]

    Tsuchida T 2002 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35 7827Google Scholar

  • 图 1  数值模拟验证初始白噪声微扰下的基阶RW解(5)式, (6)式和 (10)式的稳定性, 左列图对应$(m, n) =(-1.3514, ~0.7803)$, 中列图对应$(m, n) =(- 0.4287, ~0.6442)$. 右列图显示这两类RW结构在同一背景场中的数值激发. 图改编自文献[109]

    Fig. 1.  Simulations confirm the stability of the fundamental RW solutions (5), (6), and (10) against initial white noise perturbations. Left column: $(m, n) =(-1.3514, ~0.7803)$; Middle column: $(m, n) =(- 0.4287, ~0.6442)$. The right column shows the numerical excitation of such two rogue wave families from the same background field. Figure adapted from Ref. [109].

    图 2  互补型基阶RW解(18)式的数值模拟结果. 左列图: 未微扰情形; 右列图: 白噪声微扰情形. 图摘自文献[122]

    Fig. 2.  Simulation results of the complementary fundamental rogue wave solutions (18). Left column: unperturbed; Right column: perturbed by initial white noises. Figure adapted from Ref. [122].

    图 3  NLS–MB方程的基阶RW解(23)的时空演化, 其中(a)列图对应解析解的3D曲面和轮廓图; (b)列图为数值模拟结果, 初始条件已文中给出; (c)列图显示这类异常波结构在背景场中的数值激发产生, 已黑线圈出. 图改编自文献[95]

    Fig. 3.  Spatiotemporal evolution of the fundamental rogue wave solutions (23) of the NLS–MB equation. Column (a): Analytical solutions, given by 3D surface and contour plots; Column (b) the numerical results, with initial conditions being specified in the text; The column (c) shows the numerical excitation of the rogue waves, indicated by the black circles, from the background field. Figure adapted from Ref. [95].

  • [1]

    Kharif C, Pelinovsky E, Slunyaev A 2009 Rogue Waves in the Ocean (Berlin: Springer)

    [2]

    Dysthe K, Krogstad H E, Müller P 2008 Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40 287Google Scholar

    [3]

    Akhmediev N, Pelinovsky E 2010 Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 185 1Google Scholar

    [4]

    Lawton G 2001 New Scientist 170 28

    [5]

    Pisarchik A N, Jaimes-Reátegui R, Sevilla-Escoboza R, Huerta-Cuellar G, Taki M 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 274101Google Scholar

    [6]

    Onorato M, Resitori S, Baronio F (ed) 2016 Rogue and Shock Waves in Nonlinear Dispersive Media (Switzerland: Springer) pp179–203

    [7]

    Wabnitz S (ed) 2017 Nonlinear Guided Wave Optics: A Testbed for Extreme Waves (Bristol: IOP Publishing) Chapt. 11

    [8]

    Dudley J M, Dias F, Erkintalo M, Genty G 2014 Nat. Photonics 8 755Google Scholar

    [9]

    Onorato M, Residori S, Bortolozzo U, Montina A, Arecchi F T 2013 Phys. Rep. 528 47Google Scholar

    [10]

    Moslem W M 2011 Phys. Plasmas 18 032301Google Scholar

    [11]

    Alam M S, Hafez M G, Talukder M R, Ali M Hossain 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 095203Google Scholar

    [12]

    Tsai Y Y, Tsai J Y, Lin I 2016 Nat. Phys. 12 573Google Scholar

    [13]

    Bludov Yu V, Konotop V V, Akhmediev N 2009 Phys. Rev. A 80 033610Google Scholar

    [14]

    Wen L, Li L, Li Z D, Song S W, Zhang X F, Liu W M 2011 Eur. Phys. J. D 64 473Google Scholar

    [15]

    张解放, 戴朝卿 2016 物理学报 65 050501Google Scholar

    Zhang J F, Dai C Q 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 050501Google Scholar

    [16]

    Liu C, Yang Z Y, Zhao L C, Yang W L, Yue R H 2013 Chin. Phys. Lett. 30 040304Google Scholar

    [17]

    Yan Z Y 2010 Commun. Theor. Phys. 54 947Google Scholar

    [18]

    Chabchoub A, Hoffmann N P, Akhmediev N 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 204502Google Scholar

    [19]

    Akhmediev N, Ankiewicz A, Taki M 2009 Phys. Lett. A 373 675Google Scholar

    [20]

    Solli D R, Ropers C, Koonath P, Jalali B 2007 Nature 450 1054Google Scholar

    [21]

    Lecaplain C, Grelu Ph, Soto-Crespo J M, Akhmediev N 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 233901Google Scholar

    [22]

    Baronio F, Degasperis A, Conforti M, Wabnitz S 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 044102Google Scholar

    [23]

    Chen S, Baronio F, Soto-Crespo J M, Grelu Ph, Mihalache D 2017 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50 463001Google Scholar

    [24]

    Qiu D, He J, Zhang Y, Porsezian K 2015 Proc. R. Soc. A 471 20150236Google Scholar

    [25]

    Peregrine D H 1983 J. Aust. Math. Soc. Ser. B: Appl. Math. 25 16Google Scholar

    [26]

    Shrira V I, Geogjaev V V 2010 J. Eng. Math. 67 11Google Scholar

    [27]

    Kibler B, Fatome J, Finot C, Millot G, Dias F, Genty G, Akhmediev N, Dudley J M 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 790Google Scholar

    [28]

    Bailung H, Sharma S K, Nakamura Y 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 255005Google Scholar

    [29]

    Chabchoub A 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 144103Google Scholar

    [30]

    Walczak P, Randoux S, Suret P 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 143903Google Scholar

    [31]

    Picozzi A, Garnier J, Hansson T, Suret P, Randoux S, Millot G, Christodoulides D N 2014 Phys. Rep. 542 1Google Scholar

    [32]

    Soto-Crespo J M, Devine N, Akhmediev N 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 103901Google Scholar

    [33]

    Baronio F 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 1756Google Scholar

    [34]

    Baronio F, Chen S, Mihalache D 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 3514Google Scholar

    [35]

    Ankiewicz A, Soto-Crespo J M, Chowdhury M A, Akhmediev N 2013 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 30 87Google Scholar

    [36]

    Zhang J F, Jin M Z, He J D, Lou J H, Dai C Q 2013 Chin. Phys. B 22 054208Google Scholar

    [37]

    Ma Z Y, Ma S H 2012 Chin. Phys. B 21 030507Google Scholar

    [38]

    Chen S, Soto-Crespo J M, Grelu Ph 2014 Opt. Express 22 27632Google Scholar

    [39]

    Guo B L, Ling L M 2011 Chin. Phys. Lett. 28 110202Google Scholar

    [40]

    Baronio F, Conforti M, Degasperis A, Lombardo S 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 114101Google Scholar

    [41]

    Grelu Ph (ed) 2016 Nonlinear Optical Cavity Dynamics: from Microresonators to Fiber Lasers (Weinheim: Wiley-VCH) pp231–316

    [42]

    Grelu Ph, Akhmediev N 2012 Nat. Photonics 6 84Google Scholar

    [43]

    Chen S, Dudley J M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 233903Google Scholar

    [44]

    Akhmediev N, Ankiewicz A 1997 Solitons: Nonlinear Pulses and Beams (London: Chapman and Hall)

    [45]

    Chen S, Liu Y, Mysyrowicz A 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 061806Google Scholar

    [46]

    Guo B, Ling L, Liu Q P 2012 Phys. Rev. E 85 026607Google Scholar

    [47]

    He J S, Zhang H R, Wang L H, Porsezian K, Fokas A S 2013 Phys. Rev. E 87 052914Google Scholar

    [48]

    Wang D S, Zhang D J, Yang J 2010 J. Math. Phys. 51 023510Google Scholar

    [49]

    Wang D S, Wang X 2018 Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 41 334Google Scholar

    [50]

    Chen S, Zhou Y, Baronio F, Mihalache D 2018 Rom. Rep. Phys. 70 102

    [51]

    Akhmediev N, Ankiewicz A, Soto-Crespo J M 2009 Phys. Rev. E 80 026601Google Scholar

    [52]

    Ankiewicz A, Soto-Crespo J M, Akhmediev N 2010 Phys. Rev. E 81 046602Google Scholar

    [53]

    Chen S 2013 Phys. Rev. E 88 023202Google Scholar

    [54]

    Soto-Crespo J M, Devine N, Hoffmann N P, Akhmediev N 2014 Phys. Rev. E 90 032902Google Scholar

    [55]

    Chan H N, Chow K W, Kedziora D J, Grimshaw R H J, Ding E 2014 Phys. Rev. E 89 032914Google Scholar

    [56]

    Zhang Y, Guo L, He J, Zhou Z 2015 Lett. Math. Phys. 105 853Google Scholar

    [57]

    He J, Xu S, Porsezian K 2012 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81 124007Google Scholar

    [58]

    Chen S, Song L Y 2014 Phys. Lett. A 378 1228Google Scholar

    [59]

    Xu S, He J, Cheng Y, Porseizan K 2015 Math. Method Appl. Sci. 38 1106Google Scholar

    [60]

    He J, Wang L, Li L, Porsezian K, Erdélyi R 2014 Phys. Rev. E 89 062917Google Scholar

    [61]

    Chen S, Soto-Crespo J M, Baronio F, Grelu Ph, Mihalache D 2016 Opt. Express 24 15251Google Scholar

    [62]

    Zha Q 2013 Phys. Scr. 87 065401Google Scholar

    [63]

    Chen S, Baronio F, Soto-Crespo J M, Liu Y, Grelu Ph 2016 Phys. Rev. E 93 062202Google Scholar

    [64]

    Chen S, Zhou Y, Bu L, Baronio F, Soto-Crespo J M, Mihalache D 2019 Opt. Express 27 11370Google Scholar

    [65]

    Ankiewicz A, Kedziora D J, Chowdury A, Bandelow U, Akhmediev N 2016 Phys. Rev. E 93 012206Google Scholar

    [66]

    Zhang Y, Guo L, Chabchoub A, He J 2017 Rom. J. Phys. 62 102

    [67]

    Chen S, Mihalache D 2015 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 48 215202Google Scholar

    [68]

    Baronio F, Conforti M, Degasperis A, Lombardo S, Onorato M, Wabnitz S 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 034101Google Scholar

    [69]

    Li L, Malomed B A, Mihalache D, Liu W M 2006 Phys. Rew. E 73 066610Google Scholar

    [70]

    Chen S, Song L Y 2013 Phys. Rev. E 87 032910Google Scholar

    [71]

    Li Z D, Huo C Z, Li Q Y, He P B, Xu T F 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 040505Google Scholar

    [72]

    Ye Y, Zhou Y, Chen S, Baronio F, Grelu Ph 2019 Proc. R. Soc. A 475 20180806Google Scholar

    [73]

    Ohta Y, Yang J 2012 Phys. Rev. E 86 036604Google Scholar

    [74]

    Ohta Y, Yang J 2013 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46 105202Google Scholar

    [75]

    Randoux S, Suret P, El G 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 29238Google Scholar

    [76]

    Matveev V B, Salle M A 1991 Darboux Transformation and Solitons (Berlin: Springer)

    [77]

    Hirota R 1973 J. Math. Phys. 14 805Google Scholar

    [78]

    Zhang N, Xia T C, Hu B B 2017 Commun. Theor. Phys. 68 580Google Scholar

    [79]

    Kang Z Z, Xia T C, Ma W X 2019 Adv. Differ. Equ. NY 2019 188Google Scholar

    [80]

    Kang Z Z, Xia T C, Ma W X 2019 Proc. Rom. Acad. A 20 115

    [81]

    Baronio F, Wabnitz S, Kodama Y 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 173901Google Scholar

    [82]

    Baronio F, Chen S, Onorato M, Trillo S, Wabnitz S, Kodama Y 2016 Opt. Lett. 41 5571Google Scholar

    [83]

    Bokaeeyan M, Ankiewicz A, Akhmediev N 2019 Phys. Scr. 94 035203Google Scholar

    [84]

    Mihalache D 2017 Rom. Rep. Phys. 69 403

    [85]

    Malomed B A, Mihalache D 2019 Rom. J. Phys. 64 106

    [86]

    Frisquet B, Kibler B, Morin Ph, Baronio F, Conforti M, Millot G, Wabnitz S 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 20785Google Scholar

    [87]

    Baronio F, Frisquet B, Chen S. Millot G, Wabnitz S, Kibler B 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 013852Google Scholar

    [88]

    Tikan A, Billet C, El G, Tovbis A, Bertola M, Sylvestre T, Gustave F, Randoux S, Genty G, Suret P, Dudley J M 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 033901Google Scholar

    [89]

    Liu W, Zhang Y, He J 2018 Rom. Rep. Phys. 70 106

    [90]

    Chen S, Ye Y, Soto-Crespo J M, Grelu Ph, Baronio F 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 104101Google Scholar

    [91]

    Kibler B, Chabchoub A, Gelash A, Akhmediev N, Zakharov V E 2015 Phys. Rev. X 5 041026Google Scholar

    [92]

    Chen S, Grelu Ph, Soto-Crespo J M 2014 Phys. Rev. E 89 011201Google Scholar

    [93]

    Chen S, Baronio F, Soto-Crespo J M, Grelu Ph, Conforti M, Wabnitz S 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 033847Google Scholar

    [94]

    He J, Xu S, Porseizan K 2012 Phys. Rev. E 86 066603Google Scholar

    [95]

    Chen S, Ye Y, Baronio F, Liu Y, Cai, X M, Grelu Ph 2017 Opt. Express 25 29687Google Scholar

    [96]

    Wang X, Li Y, Huang F, Chen Y 2015 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 20 434Google Scholar

    [97]

    Degasperis A, Wabnitz S, Aceves A B 2015 Phys. Lett. A 379 1067Google Scholar

    [98]

    Guo L, Wang L, Cheng Y, He J 2017 Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 52 11Google Scholar

    [99]

    Zakharov V E 1972 Sov. Phys. JETP 35 908

    [100]

    Benney D J 1977 Stud. Appl. Math. 56 81Google Scholar

    [101]

    Djordjevic V D, Redekopp L G 1977 J. Fluid Mech. 79 703Google Scholar

    [102]

    Chowdhury A, Tataronis J A 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 153905Google Scholar

    [103]

    Shats M, Punzmann H, Xia H 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 104503Google Scholar

    [104]

    Chow K W, Chan H N, Kedziora D J, Grimshaw R H J 2013 J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82 074001Google Scholar

    [105]

    Chan H N, Grimshaw R H J, Chow K W 2018 Phys. Rev. Fluids 3 124801Google Scholar

    [106]

    Wright III O C 2006 Stud. Appl. Math. 117 71

    [107]

    Chen S 2014 Phys. Lett. A 378 1095Google Scholar

    [108]

    Baronio F, Chen S, Grelu Ph, Wabnitz S, Conforti M 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 033804Google Scholar

    [109]

    Chen S, Soto-Crespo J M, Grelu Ph 2014 Phys. Rev. E 90 033203Google Scholar

    [110]

    Kaup D J, Reiman A, Bers A 1979 Rev. Mod. Phys. 51 275Google Scholar

    [111]

    Ibragimov E, Struthers A 1996 Opt. Lett. 21 1582Google Scholar

    [112]

    Conforti M, Baronio F, Degasperis A, Wabnitz S 2007 Opt. Express 15 12246Google Scholar

    [113]

    Abdolvand A, Nazarkin A, Chugreev A V, Kaminski C F, Russell P St J 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 183902Google Scholar

    [114]

    Picholle E, Montes C, Leycuras C, Legrand O, Botineau J 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 1454Google Scholar

    [115]

    Taranenko Y N, Kazovsky L G 1992 IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 4 494Google Scholar

    [116]

    Baronio F, Conforti M, Degasperis A, Wabnitz S 2008 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 44 542Google Scholar

    [117]

    Picozzi A, Haelterman M 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 2010Google Scholar

    [118]

    Malkin V M, Shvets G, Fisch N J 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 4448Google Scholar

    [119]

    Buryak A V, Di Trapani P, Skryabin D V, Trillo S 2002 Phys. Rep. 370 63Google Scholar

    [120]

    Baronio F, Conforti M, De Angelis C, Degasperis A, Andreana M, Couderc V, Barthélémy A 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 113902Google Scholar

    [121]

    Degasperis A, Lombardo S 2006 Physica D 214 157Google Scholar

    [122]

    Chen S, Cai X M, Grelu Ph, Soto-Crespo J M, Wabnitz S, Baronio F 2016 Opt. Express 24 5886Google Scholar

    [123]

    Russell P St J, Culverhouse D, Farahi F 1991 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 27 836Google Scholar

    [124]

    Allen L, Eberly J H 1975 Optical Resonance and Two-Level Atoms (New York: Wiley)

    [125]

    Haus H A 1979 Rev. Mod. Phys. 51 331Google Scholar

    [126]

    McCall S L, Hahn E L 1967 Phys. Rev. Lett. 18 908Google Scholar

    [127]

    Nakazawa M, Yamada E, Kubota H 1991 Phys. Rev. A 44 5973Google Scholar

    [128]

    He J S, Cheng Y, Li Y S 2002 Commun. Theor. Phys. 38 493Google Scholar

    [129]

    Li C, He J, Porsezian K 2013 Phys. Rev. E 87 012913Google Scholar

    [130]

    Conforti M, Baronio F 2011 Eur. Phys. J. D 64 115Google Scholar

    [131]

    Wu C F, Grimshaw R H J, Chow K W, Chan H N 2015 Chaos 25 103113Google Scholar

    [132]

    Tsuchida T 2002 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35 7827Google Scholar

  • [1] 安新磊, 乔帅, 张莉. 基于麦克斯韦电磁场理论的神经元动力学响应与隐藏放电控制. 物理学报, 2021, 70(5): 050501. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201347
    [2] 赖煜成, 陈苏琪, 牟兰雅, 王兆娜. 基于麦克斯韦方程组的纳米尺度电磁边界条件. 物理学报, 2021, 70(23): 230301. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211025
    [3] 李树. 光子与相对论麦克斯韦分布电子散射的能谱角度谱研究. 物理学报, 2019, 68(1): 015201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181796
    [4] 朱燕清, 张丹伟, 朱诗亮. 用光晶格模拟狄拉克、外尔和麦克斯韦方程. 物理学报, 2019, 68(4): 046701. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181929
    [5] 李树. 光子与相对论麦克斯韦分布电子散射截面的蒙特卡罗计算方法. 物理学报, 2018, 67(21): 215201. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180932
    [6] 胡亮, 罗懋康. 柱面非线性麦克斯韦方程组的行波解. 物理学报, 2017, 66(13): 130302. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.130302
    [7] 林福忠, 马松华. (2+1)维色散长波方程的新精确解及其复合波激发. 物理学报, 2014, 63(4): 040508. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.040508
    [8] 李学良, 石雁祥. 双麦克斯韦分布尘埃等离子体中尘埃粒子的充电研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(21): 215201. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.215201
    [9] 文文, 李慧军, 陈秉岩. 强相互作用费米气体在谐振子势中的干涉演化. 物理学报, 2012, 61(22): 220306. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.220306
    [10] 王亚伟, 刘明礼, 刘仁杰, 雷海娜, 田相龙. Fabry-Perot腔谐振对横电波激励下亚波长一维金属光栅的异常透射性的作用. 物理学报, 2011, 60(2): 024217. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.024217
    [11] 满达夫, 那仁满都拉. 具有能量输入/输出的固体层中孤立波的传播及相互作用特性. 物理学报, 2010, 59(1): 60-66. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.60
    [12] 王媛媛, 张彩虹, 马金龙, 金飙兵, 许伟伟, 康琳, 陈健, 吴培亨. 亚波长孔阵列的太赫兹波异常透射研究. 物理学报, 2009, 58(10): 6884-6888. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.6884
    [13] 巩华荣, 宫玉彬, 魏彦玉, 唐昌建, 薛东海, 王文祥. 考虑到束-波相互作用的速调管离子噪声二维模拟. 物理学报, 2006, 55(10): 5368-5374. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.5368
    [14] 贾 飞, 谢双媛, 羊亚平. 非旋波近似下频率变化的场与原子的相互作用. 物理学报, 2006, 55(11): 5835-5841. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.5835
    [15] 套格图桑, 斯仁道尔吉. 非线性长波方程组和Benjamin方程的新精确孤波解. 物理学报, 2006, 55(7): 3246-3254. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3246
    [16] 郭冠平, 张解放. 长短波相互作用方程的Jacobi椭圆函数求解. 物理学报, 2003, 52(11): 2660-2663. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.2660
    [17] 刘三秋, 郭 琴, 陶向阳, 付传鸿. 非旋波近似下级联型三能级原子与腔场相互作用的量子动力学性质. 物理学报, 1998, 47(9): 1481-1488. doi: 10.7498/aps.47.1481
    [18] 余玮, 徐至展, 马锦秀, 陈荣清. 等离子体拍频波加速器中三波相互作用的时间发展. 物理学报, 1993, 42(3): 431-436. doi: 10.7498/aps.42.431
    [19] 贺凯芬. 耗散三波相互作用定态的Hopf分岔. 物理学报, 1987, 36(11): 1451-1458. doi: 10.7498/aps.36.1451
    [20] 秦运文. 关于辐射在双麦克斯韦等离子体中散射的结构因子. 物理学报, 1984, 33(4): 561-563. doi: 10.7498/aps.33.561
计量
  • 文章访问数:  7427
  • PDF下载量:  181
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-08-19
  • 修回日期:  2019-10-28
  • 上网日期:  2019-12-05
  • 刊出日期:  2020-01-05

/

返回文章
返回