搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

利用飞秒受激拉曼光谱技术研究Pyranine分子激发态质子传递过程

王子钰 魏景乐 徐文琪 姜甲明 黄逸凡 刘伟民

引用本文:
Citation:

利用飞秒受激拉曼光谱技术研究Pyranine分子激发态质子传递过程

王子钰, 魏景乐, 徐文琪, 姜甲明, 黄逸凡, 刘伟民

Excited state proton transfer processes of pyranine studied by femtosecond stimulated Raman spectroscopy

Wang Zi-Yu, Wei Jing-Le, Xu Wen-Qi, Jiang Jia-Ming, Huang Yi-Fan, Liu Wei-Min
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 本文利用共振增强的飞秒受激拉曼光谱技术结合瞬态吸收光谱技术研究了光致产酸剂Pyranine发色团分子在水溶液中与醋酸根离子之间的光致激发态质子传递过程. 实验中观测到了Pyranine发色团在400—1700 cm–1频率范围内去质子化状态下的激发态拉曼振动光谱. 同时在920 cm–1 处也观测到了质子化醋酸根离子中激发态碳-碳单键伸缩拉曼振动信号. 通过对激发态质子传递中给体和受体的动力学的分析得到了在该条件下的激发态质子传递的速率.
    As one of the most fundamental processes, proton transfer reaction plays an important role in chemical and biological process, and to reveal the choreography of the proton motion intra- and intermolecularly, a spectroscopic technique capable of capturing molecular structural dynamics of excited-state proton transfer motions on an intrinsic time scale is needed. In this study, We utilize wavelength-tunable femtosecond stimulated Raman spectroscopy with a time resolution of ~100 fs, spectral resolution of 15 cm–1 and spectral range of 400 cm–1—1800 cm–1, combined with traditional transient absorption spectroscopywith a time window between 0 and 600 ps to simultaneously achieve reaction dynamics for transient reactant and product of the photoacid pyranine (8-hydroxypyrene1, 3, 6-trisulfonic acid, HPTS) molecules undergoing excited-state proton transfer reaction in complex with water and acetate molecules. Marker bands attributed to the deprotonated form of HPTS in a frequency range from 400 cm–1 to 1700 cm–1 are obtained under the excitation of 400 nm laser pulses. The marker band at 1516 cm–1, which is assigned to phenolic ring carbon carbon double band stretching accompanied with carbon hydrogen in-plane rocking motions, exhibits complex rise and decay dynamics. The simultaneously observed excited-state Raman mode at 920 cm–1 which is assigned to the excited carbon-carbon single bond stretch mode in the protonated acetic acid root molecule, helps us to clearly resolve the reaction rates of excited-state proton transfer. Based on the multi-exponential fitting results, the dynamics of excited-state Raman mode at 920 cm–1 exhibits bi-exponential processes with time constants of ~470 fs and ~3 ps. The ultrafast time component indicates that the excited-state proton transfer originates from an HPTS-acetate complex, indicating that part of the ground-state HPTS molecules are in the “tight” hydrogen bonding configuration that can quickly shift the excited-state proton charge toward the acetate acceptor molecule through a direct hydrogen bond. The second slower time component implies a significant subpopulation of HPTS in the ground state, i.e. hydrogen bonds to an acetate ion via an intervening water molecule, and upon photo excitation, the proton transfers to the water solvent before proton is picked up by the acetate ion.
      通信作者: 刘伟民, liuwm@shanghaitech.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 11774233)资助的课题
      Corresponding author: Liu Wei-Min, liuwm@shanghaitech.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11774233)
    [1]

    Weinberg D R, Gagliardi C J, Hull J F, MurpHy C F, Kent C A, Westlake B C, Paul A, Ess D H, McCafferty D G, Meyer T J 2012 Chem. Rev. 112 4016Google Scholar

    [2]

    Hayashi S, Tajkhorshid E, Schulten K 2002 Biophys. J. 83 1281Google Scholar

    [3]

    Jacquemin D, Zuniga J, Requena A, Céron-Carrasco J P 2014 Accounts Chem. Res. 47 2467Google Scholar

    [4]

    Fang C, Frontiera R R, Tran R, Mathies R A 2009 Nature 462 200Google Scholar

    [5]

    Oscar B G, Liu W, Zhao Y, Tang L, Wang Y, Campbell R E, Fang C 2014 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 10191Google Scholar

    [6]

    Chou P, McMorrow D, Aartsma T, Kasha M 1984 J. Phys. Chem. 88 4596Google Scholar

    [7]

    Zhao J, Ji S, Chen Y, Guo H, Yang P 2012 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14 8803Google Scholar

    [8]

    Tseng H W, Liu J Q, Chen Y A, Chao C M, Liu K M, Chen C L, Lin T C, Hung C H, Chou Y L, Lin T C 2015 Chem. Phys. Lett. 6 1477Google Scholar

    [9]

    Kwon J E, Park S Y 2011 Adv. Mater. 23 3615Google Scholar

    [10]

    Chudoba C, Riedle E, Pfeiffer M, Elsaesser T 1996 Chem. Phys. lett. 263 622Google Scholar

    [11]

    Leiderman P, Genosar L, Huppert D 2005 J. Phys. Chem. A 109 5965Google Scholar

    [12]

    Tran-Thi T H, Gustavsson T, Prayer C, Pommeret S, Hynes J T 2000 Chem. Phys. Lett. 329 421Google Scholar

    [13]

    Kukura P, Frontiera R, Mathies R A 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 238303Google Scholar

    [14]

    Frontiera R, Mathies R A 2011 Laser Photonics Rev. 5 102Google Scholar

    [15]

    赵晓辉, 马菲, 吴义室, 艾希成, 张建平 2008 物理学报 57 298Google Scholar

    Zhao X H, Ma F, Wu Y S, Ai X C 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 298Google Scholar

    [16]

    Chen C, Zhu L D, Boulanger S A, Baleeva N S, Myasnyanko I N, Baranov M S, Fang C 2020 J. Chem. Phys. 152 021101Google Scholar

    [17]

    Fang C, Tang L T, Oscar B G, Chen C 2018 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9 3253Google Scholar

    [18]

    Liu W M, Han F Y, Smith C, Fang C 2012 J. Phys. Chem. B 116 10535Google Scholar

    [19]

    Han F Y, Liu W M, Fang C 2013 Chem. Phys. 422 204Google Scholar

    [20]

    Wang Y L, Liu W M, Tang L T, Oscar B, Han F, Fang C 2013 J. Phys. Chem. A 117 6024Google Scholar

    [21]

    Liu W M, Wang Y L, Tang L T, Oscar B G, Zhu L D, Fang C 2016 Chem. Sci. 7 5484Google Scholar

    [22]

    Liu W M, Tang L T, Oscar B G, Wang Y L, Chen C, Fang C 2017 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8 997Google Scholar

    [23]

    Oscar B G, Chen C, Liu W M, Zhu L D, Fang C 2017 J. Phys. Chem. A 121 5428Google Scholar

    [24]

    Tang L T, Wang Y L, Zhu L D, Lee C, Fang C 2018 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9 2311Google Scholar

    [25]

    Chakraborty S, Nandi S, Bhattacharyya K, Mukherjee S 2019 ChemPhysChem 20 3221Google Scholar

    [26]

    Siwick B J, Bakker H J 2007 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 13412Google Scholar

  • 图 1  飞秒受激拉曼技术光路图, 其中BS1, BS2为分束片; L1, L2, L3, L4为凸透镜; ND为渐变衰减片; DL1为手动位移台; DL2为电动位移台

    Fig. 1.  Schematic diagram of FSRS experimental setup. BS1 and BS2 are beam splitters; L1, L2, L3 and L4 are convex lenses; ND is neutral density filters; DL1 is manual translation stage; DL2 is delay line.

    图 2  (a) HPTS分子从质子化状态(左)经光激发转变为去质子化状态(右); (b) HPTS分别在NaAC溶液(蓝色), pH = 12水溶液(绿色)和pH = 4.5水溶液(黑色)中的稳态吸收光谱(实线)以及荧光发射光谱(虚线)

    Fig. 2.  (a) The molecular structure of HPTS in one simple H-bonding geometry with acetate ion; (b) the steady-state absorption (solid line) and fluorescence emission spectra (dash dot line) of HPTS in aqueous solution (pH = 4.5, black; pH = 12, green) and acetate solution (blue).

    图 3  (a) HPTS(NaAC)样品的150 fs 到500 ps时间范围内的瞬态吸收数据; (b) 瞬态吸收数据在520 nm的时域光谱

    Fig. 3.  (a) The transient absorption spectra of HPTS (NaAC) from 150 fs to 500 ps after 400 nm excitation; (b) the dynamics of stimulated emission band of HPTS (NaAC) at 520 nm.

    图 4  (a) HPTS (NaAC)和(b) HPTS(pH = 12)两样品的在400−1700 cm–1频率范围内的FSRS光谱图

    Fig. 4.  Time-resolved excited-state FSRS spectra between ca. 400−1700 cm–1 of (a) HPTS (NaAC) and (b) HPTS (pH = 12) in water following 400 nm photoexcitation.

    图 5  (a) HPTS(NaAC)和(b) HPTS(pH = 12)在1615 cm–1的FSRS动力学光谱; (c) HPTS(NaAC)在920 cm–1的FSRS动力学光谱; (d) HPTS(NaAC)和HPTS(pH=12)在1615 cm–1处时间窗口为1.5 ps的FSRS动力学光谱; (e) HPTS去质子状态下1615 cm–1的拉曼振动模式示意图

    Fig. 5.  Excited-state Raman dynamics spectra of (a) HPTS (NaAC) at 1615 cm–1 and (b) HPTS (pH = 12) at 1615 cm–1; (c) excited-state Raman dynamics spectra of HPTS (NaAC) at 920 cm–1; (d) excited-state Raman dynamics spectra of HPTS (NaAC) and HPTS (pH = 12) at 1615 cm–1 present in the time window of 1.5 ps; (e) Raman vibrational motions of deprotonated HPTS at 1615 cm–1.

  • [1]

    Weinberg D R, Gagliardi C J, Hull J F, MurpHy C F, Kent C A, Westlake B C, Paul A, Ess D H, McCafferty D G, Meyer T J 2012 Chem. Rev. 112 4016Google Scholar

    [2]

    Hayashi S, Tajkhorshid E, Schulten K 2002 Biophys. J. 83 1281Google Scholar

    [3]

    Jacquemin D, Zuniga J, Requena A, Céron-Carrasco J P 2014 Accounts Chem. Res. 47 2467Google Scholar

    [4]

    Fang C, Frontiera R R, Tran R, Mathies R A 2009 Nature 462 200Google Scholar

    [5]

    Oscar B G, Liu W, Zhao Y, Tang L, Wang Y, Campbell R E, Fang C 2014 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 10191Google Scholar

    [6]

    Chou P, McMorrow D, Aartsma T, Kasha M 1984 J. Phys. Chem. 88 4596Google Scholar

    [7]

    Zhao J, Ji S, Chen Y, Guo H, Yang P 2012 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14 8803Google Scholar

    [8]

    Tseng H W, Liu J Q, Chen Y A, Chao C M, Liu K M, Chen C L, Lin T C, Hung C H, Chou Y L, Lin T C 2015 Chem. Phys. Lett. 6 1477Google Scholar

    [9]

    Kwon J E, Park S Y 2011 Adv. Mater. 23 3615Google Scholar

    [10]

    Chudoba C, Riedle E, Pfeiffer M, Elsaesser T 1996 Chem. Phys. lett. 263 622Google Scholar

    [11]

    Leiderman P, Genosar L, Huppert D 2005 J. Phys. Chem. A 109 5965Google Scholar

    [12]

    Tran-Thi T H, Gustavsson T, Prayer C, Pommeret S, Hynes J T 2000 Chem. Phys. Lett. 329 421Google Scholar

    [13]

    Kukura P, Frontiera R, Mathies R A 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 238303Google Scholar

    [14]

    Frontiera R, Mathies R A 2011 Laser Photonics Rev. 5 102Google Scholar

    [15]

    赵晓辉, 马菲, 吴义室, 艾希成, 张建平 2008 物理学报 57 298Google Scholar

    Zhao X H, Ma F, Wu Y S, Ai X C 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 298Google Scholar

    [16]

    Chen C, Zhu L D, Boulanger S A, Baleeva N S, Myasnyanko I N, Baranov M S, Fang C 2020 J. Chem. Phys. 152 021101Google Scholar

    [17]

    Fang C, Tang L T, Oscar B G, Chen C 2018 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9 3253Google Scholar

    [18]

    Liu W M, Han F Y, Smith C, Fang C 2012 J. Phys. Chem. B 116 10535Google Scholar

    [19]

    Han F Y, Liu W M, Fang C 2013 Chem. Phys. 422 204Google Scholar

    [20]

    Wang Y L, Liu W M, Tang L T, Oscar B, Han F, Fang C 2013 J. Phys. Chem. A 117 6024Google Scholar

    [21]

    Liu W M, Wang Y L, Tang L T, Oscar B G, Zhu L D, Fang C 2016 Chem. Sci. 7 5484Google Scholar

    [22]

    Liu W M, Tang L T, Oscar B G, Wang Y L, Chen C, Fang C 2017 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8 997Google Scholar

    [23]

    Oscar B G, Chen C, Liu W M, Zhu L D, Fang C 2017 J. Phys. Chem. A 121 5428Google Scholar

    [24]

    Tang L T, Wang Y L, Zhu L D, Lee C, Fang C 2018 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9 2311Google Scholar

    [25]

    Chakraborty S, Nandi S, Bhattacharyya K, Mukherjee S 2019 ChemPhysChem 20 3221Google Scholar

    [26]

    Siwick B J, Bakker H J 2007 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 13412Google Scholar

计量
  • 文章访问数:  7095
  • PDF下载量:  151
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-02-18
  • 修回日期:  2020-05-12
  • 上网日期:  2020-06-15
  • 刊出日期:  2020-10-05

/

返回文章
返回