搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

二氧化钛亚表面电荷对其表面点缺陷和吸附原子分布的影响

温焕飞 菅原康弘 李艳君

引用本文:
Citation:

二氧化钛亚表面电荷对其表面点缺陷和吸附原子分布的影响

温焕飞, 菅原康弘, 李艳君

Effects of subsurface charge on surface defect and adsorbate of rutile TiO2 (110)

Wen Huan-Fei, Yasuhiro Sugawara, Li Yan-Jun
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 半导体金属氧化物二氧化钛因其稳定、高效、无毒、兼容、低廉等优点受到广泛的关注, 本文在低温78 K下利用原子力显微镜探索了二氧化钛亚表面电荷的特性及其对表面点缺陷和吸附原子分布的影响. 在原子结构形貌图中亚表面电荷被成像为椭圆形亮丘, 且亮丘的高度主要分布在3个不同的区间内, 这意味着亚表面电荷位于3个不同的亚表面原子层. 在开尔文探针力显微镜成像中, 亚表面电荷的电势分布相对低, 根据电势成像机理, 亚表面电荷为正电荷特性. 原子力显微镜的成像图表明, 亚表面电荷不仅排斥具有正电荷特性的表面氧空位、吸附氢原子和表面台阶, 而且排斥具有负电荷特性的吸附氧原子. 实验结果有助于二氧化钛物理特性的研究及其相关产品性能的改进和设计.
    Transition-metal-oxide as a typical model surface for investigating the catalytic mechanism has been widely studied. Over the past years, the TiO2 properties have been reported. It is commonly accepted that the catalytic activity of reduced TiO2 is related to its defects, with the accompanying excess electrons leading to n-type conductivity. It is realized that subsurface charge is of key importance for the redox chemistry of TiO2 (110).Subsurface charge is explored by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM). Subsurface charge exerts an additional attractive force on the scanning AFM tip, resulting in the relative retraction of tip motion in order to keep a constant frequency shift. As a result, the subsurface charged region is imaged as protrusion in an AFM topographic image. The height of bright hillock is mainly distributed in three different ranges, which means that the subsurface charges are at three different subsurface layers. The AFM results show such subsurface charges repel the electropositive oxygen vacancy, hydrogen atoms and step edges. It is obvious that there is not only an Ov depletion zone but also the subsurface charge free region in the proximity of the $\left\langle {001} \right\rangle $ and $\left\langle {1\bar 11} \right\rangle$ step edge.The KPFM image indicates that the subsurface charges are the positive charges. which is consistent with common sense. After oxygen exposure, it is found that the oxygen adatom is electronegative, but it is absent in the vicinity of positive subsurface charges. Irrespective of adsorbate being electropositive or electronegative, an adsorbate-free zone generally exists in the proximity of the charged region. Obviously, the present study is expected to provide some insights into clarifying the nature of subsurface charge and improving catalytic design.
      通信作者: 李艳君, liyanjun@ap.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp
    • 基金项目: 国家重点研发计划(批准号: 2017YFE0130200)、国家自然科学基金(批准号: 51905500, 61874100)和山西省自然科学基金(批准号: 201901D211253)资助的课题
      Corresponding author: Li Yan-Jun, liyanjun@ap.eng.osaka-u.ac.jp
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFE0130200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51905500, 61874100), and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province, China (Grant No. 201901D211253)
    [1]

    Fujishima A, Honda K 1972 Nature 238 37Google Scholar

    [2]

    Diebold U 2003 Surf. Sci. Rep. 48 53Google Scholar

    [3]

    Pang C L, Lindsay R, Thornton G 2008 Chem. Soc. Rev. 37 2328Google Scholar

    [4]

    Henderson M A, Lyubinetsky I 2013 Chem. Rev. 113 4428Google Scholar

    [5]

    Wen H F, Adachi Y, Zhang Q, Miyazaki M, Sugawara Y, Li Y J 2019 J. Phys. Chem. C 123 25756Google Scholar

    [6]

    Guo Q, Ma Z, Zhou C, Ren Z, Yang X 2019 Chem. Rev. 119 11020Google Scholar

    [7]

    Guo C, Meng X, Fu H, Wang Q, Wang H, Tian Y, Peng J, Ma R, Weng Y, Meng S, Wang E, Jiang Y 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 206801Google Scholar

    [8]

    Tan S, Feng H, Zheng Q, Cui X, Zhao J, Luo Y, Yang J, Wang B, Hou J G 2020 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 826Google Scholar

    [9]

    Wen H F, Miyazaki M, Zhang Q, Adachi Y, Li Y J, Sugawara Y 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 28331Google Scholar

    [10]

    Batzill M, Katsiev K, Gaspar D J, Diebold U 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 235401Google Scholar

    [11]

    Wendt S, Schaub R, Sprunger P T, Lira E, Madsen G K H, Li Z, Hansen J O, Matthiesen J, Blekinge-Rasmussen A, Lægsgaard E, Hammer B, Besenbacher F 2008 Science 320 1755Google Scholar

    [12]

    李天晶, 李公平, 马俊平, 高行新 2011 物理学报 60 116102Google Scholar

    Li T J, Li G P, Ma J P, Gao X X 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 116102Google Scholar

    [13]

    薛将, 潘风明, 裴煜 2013 物理学报 62 158103Google Scholar

    Xu J, Pan F M, Pei Y 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 158103Google Scholar

    [14]

    朱学文, 徐利春, 刘瑞萍, 杨致, 李秀燕 2015 物理学报 64 147103Google Scholar

    Zhu X M, Xu L C, Liu R P, Yang Z, Li X Y 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 147103Google Scholar

    [15]

    朱伟君, 陈金鑫, 高宇晗, 杨德仁, 马向阳 2019 物理学报 68 124204Google Scholar

    Zhu W J, Chen J X, Gao Y H, Yang D R, Ma X Y 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 124204Google Scholar

    [16]

    Yoon Y, Du Y, Garcia J C, Zhu Z, Wang Z T, Petrik N G, Kimmel G A, Dohnalek Z, Henderson M A, Rousseau R, Deskins N A, Lyubinetsky I 2015 Chem. Phys. Chem. 16 313Google Scholar

    [17]

    Feng H, Xu Z, Ren L, Liu C, Zhuang J, Hu Z, Xu X, Chen J, Wang J, Hao W, Du Y, Dou S X 2018 ACS Catal. 8 4288Google Scholar

    [18]

    Binnig G, Quate C. F, Gerber C. H 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 930Google Scholar

    [19]

    García R, Pérez R 2002 Surf. Sci. Rep. 47 197Google Scholar

    [20]

    Jiang P, Bao X, Salmeron M 2015 Acc. Chem. Res. 48 1524Google Scholar

    [21]

    Zhang J, Chen P C, Yuan B K, Ji W, Cheng Z H, Qiu X H 2013 Science 342 611Google Scholar

    [22]

    Guo J, Meng X Z, Chen J, Peng J B, Sheng J M, Li X Z, Xu L M, Shi J R, Wang E G, Jiang Y 2014 Nat. Mater. 13 184Google Scholar

    [23]

    Ma R, Cao D, Zhu C, Tian Y, Peng J, Guo J, Chen J, Li X Z, Francisco J S, Zeng X C, Xu L M, Wang E G, Jiang Y 2020 Nature 577 60Google Scholar

    [24]

    Li Y J, Wen H F, Zhang Q, Adachi Y, Arima E, Kinoshita Y, Nomura H, Ma Z, Kou L, Tsukuda Y, Naitoh Y, Sugawara Y, Xu R, Cheng Z H 2018 Ultramicroscopy 191 51Google Scholar

    [25]

    Kinoshita Y, Naitoh Y, Li Y J, Sugawara Y 2011 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82 113707Google Scholar

    [26]

    Zhang Z, Ge Q, Li S C, Kay B D, White J M, Dohnalek Z 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 126105Google Scholar

    [27]

    Lauritsen J V, Foster A S, Olesen G H, Christensen M C, Kühnle A, Helveg S, Rostrup-Niesen J R, Clausen B S, Reichling M, Besenbacher F 2006 Nanotechnology 17 3436Google Scholar

    [28]

    Bechstein R, González C, Schütte J, Jelínek P, Pérez R, Kühnle A 2009 Nanotechnology 20 505703Google Scholar

    [29]

    Yurtsever A, Sugimoto Y, Abe M, Morita S 2010 Nanotechnology 21 165702Google Scholar

    [30]

    Ishida N, Fujita D J 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 20300Google Scholar

    [31]

    Byl O, Yates J T Jr 2006 J. Phys. Chem. B 110 22966Google Scholar

    [32]

    Smoluchowski, R 1941 Phys. Rev. 60 661Google Scholar

    [33]

    Miyazaki M, Wen H F, Zhang Q, Adachi Y, Brndiar J, Štich I, Li Y J, Sugawara Y 2019 Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 10 1228Google Scholar

    [34]

    Zhang Q, Li Y J, Wen H F, Adachi Y, Miyazaki M, Sugawara Y, Xu R, Cheng Z H, Brndiar J, Kantorovich L, Štich I 2018 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 15668Google Scholar

  • 图 1  金红石TiO2 (110)-(1 × 1)的表面模型结构的 (a)俯视图和(b)侧视图(由交替的五配位Ti5c列(橙色球)和六配位的Ti6c组成; Ti6c列被共面的三配位氧气O3c列(蓝色球)和二配位桥氧O2c列(灰色球)所包围; 表面缺陷主要包含Ov (虚黑圈)和OH缺陷(绿色小球))

    Fig. 1.  (a) Top view and (b) side view of ball model of rutile TiO2 (110)-(1 × 1) surface consist of alternating O2c (gray ball) and Ti5c (orange ball) atom rows. H atom (green small ball) is generated by water dissociation on Ov site, and O adatom (light green large ball) on Ti5c row is formed by O2 dissociation on Ov and/or Ti5c sites.

    图 2  TiO2 (110)样品表面的代表性AF​​M形貌图 (a)和(b)中亮列是O2c, 暗点是表面缺陷; (c)中亮列是Ti5c, 亮点是缺陷; (d)是亮丘的轮廓线, 表明亚表面缺陷分布于3个不同的亚表面原子层.

    Fig. 2.  AFM topographic images of TiO2 (110) surface obtained at different experiments at 78 K. (a), (b) The bright rows are the O2c row, and dark spots are the surface defects. (c) The bright rows are the Ti5c row. Bright spot is the Ov, and brighter spots are the H atoms. Bright regions are observed in all three images. (d) Line profiles cross the bright region along the $ \left[ {1\bar10} \right] $ direction on TiO2 (110) surface, taken from different AFM images. The height shows three specific regions, corresponding to three different depths of subsurface charge.

    图 3  TiO2 (110)氧表面形貌图, 其中Oad沿着亚表面电荷吸附

    Fig. 3.  AFM images of O-TiO2 (110) surface. Oad adsorbs around the subsurface charge.

    图 4  (a)和(b)分别是O-TiO2 (110)表面形貌图和相应的局部接触电势差图像; 表明Oad带负电, 亚表面缺陷为正电特性

    Fig. 4.  (a) Topographic and (b) corresponding local contact potential difference images of O-TiO2 (110) surface. It indicates Oad is negative and the subsurface charge is positive.

  • [1]

    Fujishima A, Honda K 1972 Nature 238 37Google Scholar

    [2]

    Diebold U 2003 Surf. Sci. Rep. 48 53Google Scholar

    [3]

    Pang C L, Lindsay R, Thornton G 2008 Chem. Soc. Rev. 37 2328Google Scholar

    [4]

    Henderson M A, Lyubinetsky I 2013 Chem. Rev. 113 4428Google Scholar

    [5]

    Wen H F, Adachi Y, Zhang Q, Miyazaki M, Sugawara Y, Li Y J 2019 J. Phys. Chem. C 123 25756Google Scholar

    [6]

    Guo Q, Ma Z, Zhou C, Ren Z, Yang X 2019 Chem. Rev. 119 11020Google Scholar

    [7]

    Guo C, Meng X, Fu H, Wang Q, Wang H, Tian Y, Peng J, Ma R, Weng Y, Meng S, Wang E, Jiang Y 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 206801Google Scholar

    [8]

    Tan S, Feng H, Zheng Q, Cui X, Zhao J, Luo Y, Yang J, Wang B, Hou J G 2020 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 826Google Scholar

    [9]

    Wen H F, Miyazaki M, Zhang Q, Adachi Y, Li Y J, Sugawara Y 2018 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 28331Google Scholar

    [10]

    Batzill M, Katsiev K, Gaspar D J, Diebold U 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 235401Google Scholar

    [11]

    Wendt S, Schaub R, Sprunger P T, Lira E, Madsen G K H, Li Z, Hansen J O, Matthiesen J, Blekinge-Rasmussen A, Lægsgaard E, Hammer B, Besenbacher F 2008 Science 320 1755Google Scholar

    [12]

    李天晶, 李公平, 马俊平, 高行新 2011 物理学报 60 116102Google Scholar

    Li T J, Li G P, Ma J P, Gao X X 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 116102Google Scholar

    [13]

    薛将, 潘风明, 裴煜 2013 物理学报 62 158103Google Scholar

    Xu J, Pan F M, Pei Y 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 158103Google Scholar

    [14]

    朱学文, 徐利春, 刘瑞萍, 杨致, 李秀燕 2015 物理学报 64 147103Google Scholar

    Zhu X M, Xu L C, Liu R P, Yang Z, Li X Y 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 147103Google Scholar

    [15]

    朱伟君, 陈金鑫, 高宇晗, 杨德仁, 马向阳 2019 物理学报 68 124204Google Scholar

    Zhu W J, Chen J X, Gao Y H, Yang D R, Ma X Y 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 124204Google Scholar

    [16]

    Yoon Y, Du Y, Garcia J C, Zhu Z, Wang Z T, Petrik N G, Kimmel G A, Dohnalek Z, Henderson M A, Rousseau R, Deskins N A, Lyubinetsky I 2015 Chem. Phys. Chem. 16 313Google Scholar

    [17]

    Feng H, Xu Z, Ren L, Liu C, Zhuang J, Hu Z, Xu X, Chen J, Wang J, Hao W, Du Y, Dou S X 2018 ACS Catal. 8 4288Google Scholar

    [18]

    Binnig G, Quate C. F, Gerber C. H 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 930Google Scholar

    [19]

    García R, Pérez R 2002 Surf. Sci. Rep. 47 197Google Scholar

    [20]

    Jiang P, Bao X, Salmeron M 2015 Acc. Chem. Res. 48 1524Google Scholar

    [21]

    Zhang J, Chen P C, Yuan B K, Ji W, Cheng Z H, Qiu X H 2013 Science 342 611Google Scholar

    [22]

    Guo J, Meng X Z, Chen J, Peng J B, Sheng J M, Li X Z, Xu L M, Shi J R, Wang E G, Jiang Y 2014 Nat. Mater. 13 184Google Scholar

    [23]

    Ma R, Cao D, Zhu C, Tian Y, Peng J, Guo J, Chen J, Li X Z, Francisco J S, Zeng X C, Xu L M, Wang E G, Jiang Y 2020 Nature 577 60Google Scholar

    [24]

    Li Y J, Wen H F, Zhang Q, Adachi Y, Arima E, Kinoshita Y, Nomura H, Ma Z, Kou L, Tsukuda Y, Naitoh Y, Sugawara Y, Xu R, Cheng Z H 2018 Ultramicroscopy 191 51Google Scholar

    [25]

    Kinoshita Y, Naitoh Y, Li Y J, Sugawara Y 2011 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82 113707Google Scholar

    [26]

    Zhang Z, Ge Q, Li S C, Kay B D, White J M, Dohnalek Z 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 126105Google Scholar

    [27]

    Lauritsen J V, Foster A S, Olesen G H, Christensen M C, Kühnle A, Helveg S, Rostrup-Niesen J R, Clausen B S, Reichling M, Besenbacher F 2006 Nanotechnology 17 3436Google Scholar

    [28]

    Bechstein R, González C, Schütte J, Jelínek P, Pérez R, Kühnle A 2009 Nanotechnology 20 505703Google Scholar

    [29]

    Yurtsever A, Sugimoto Y, Abe M, Morita S 2010 Nanotechnology 21 165702Google Scholar

    [30]

    Ishida N, Fujita D J 2012 J. Phys. Chem. C 116 20300Google Scholar

    [31]

    Byl O, Yates J T Jr 2006 J. Phys. Chem. B 110 22966Google Scholar

    [32]

    Smoluchowski, R 1941 Phys. Rev. 60 661Google Scholar

    [33]

    Miyazaki M, Wen H F, Zhang Q, Adachi Y, Brndiar J, Štich I, Li Y J, Sugawara Y 2019 Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 10 1228Google Scholar

    [34]

    Zhang Q, Li Y J, Wen H F, Adachi Y, Miyazaki M, Sugawara Y, Xu R, Cheng Z H, Brndiar J, Kantorovich L, Štich I 2018 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 15668Google Scholar

  • [1] 肖友鹏, 王怀平, 冯林. 硒化亚锗异质结太阳电池模拟研究. 物理学报, 2023, 72(24): 248801. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231220
    [2] 温恒迪, 刘跃, 甄良, 李洋, 徐成彦. MoS2/MoTe2垂直异质结的电荷传输及其调制. 物理学报, 2023, 72(3): 036102. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221768
    [3] 冯婕, 郭强, 舒鹏丽, 温阳, 温焕飞, 马宗敏, 李艳君, 刘俊, 伊戈尔·弗拉基米罗维奇·雅明斯基. 超高真空原子尺度Aux/Si(111)-(7×7)表面吸附的电荷分布测量. 物理学报, 2023, 72(11): 110701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230051
    [4] 王慧云, 冯婕, 王旭东, 温阳, 魏久焱, 温焕飞, 石云波, 马宗敏, 李艳君, 刘俊. 室温超高真空环境原子尺度Au/Si(111)-(7×7)不定域吸附的局域接触势能差测量技术. 物理学报, 2022, 71(6): 060702. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211853
    [5] 孟菁饴, 卢红伟, 马世乐, 张嘉奇, 何富民, 苏伟涛, 赵晓东, 田婷, 王翼, 邢誉. 功能化原子力显微镜在纳米电介质材料性能研究中的应用进展. 物理学报, 2022, 71(24): 240701. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221462
    [6] 俞奕飞, 曹毅. 从蘸笔纳米刻印术到力化学打印. 物理学报, 2021, 70(2): 024202. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201537
    [7] 王言博, 崔丹钰, 张才益, 韩礼元, 杨旭东. 钙钛矿太阳能电池研究进展: 空间电势与光电转换机制. 物理学报, 2019, 68(15): 158401. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190569
    [8] 李宗宝, 王霞, 周瑞雪, 王应, 李勇. Cu-Ag协同表面改性TiO2的第一性原理研究. 物理学报, 2017, 66(11): 117101. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.117101
    [9] 刘坤, 王福合, 尚家香. NiTi(110)表面氧原子吸附的第一性原理研究. 物理学报, 2017, 66(21): 216801. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.216801
    [10] 周浩天, 高翔, 郑鹏, 秦猛, 曹毅, 王炜. 弹性蛋白力学特性的单分子力谱. 物理学报, 2016, 65(18): 188703. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.188703
    [11] 薛慧, 马宗敏, 石云波, 唐军, 薛晨阳, 刘俊, 李艳君. 铁磁共振磁交换力显微镜. 物理学报, 2013, 62(18): 180704. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.180704
    [12] 李天晶, 李公平, 马俊平, 高行新. 钴离子注入对二氧化钛晶体的结构和光学性能的影响. 物理学报, 2011, 60(11): 116102. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.116102
    [13] 季超, 张凌云, 窦硕星, 王鹏业. 原子力显微镜观测生物大分子图像的一种处理方法. 物理学报, 2011, 60(9): 098703. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.098703
    [14] 张丽卿, 张崇宏, 杨义涛, 姚存峰, 孙友梅, 李炳生, 赵志明, 宋书建. 高电荷态离子126Xeq+引起GaN表面形貌变化研究. 物理学报, 2009, 58(8): 5578-5584. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.5578
    [15] 樊康旗, 贾建援, 朱应敏, 刘小院. 原子力显微镜在轻敲模式下的动力学模型. 物理学报, 2007, 56(11): 6345-6351. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.6345
    [16] 胡海龙, 张 琨, 王振兴, 王晓平. 自组装硫醇分子膜电输运特性的导电原子力显微镜研究. 物理学报, 2006, 55(3): 1430-1434. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.1430
    [17] 汪 洋, 孟 亮. TiO2表面氧空位对NO分子吸附的作用. 物理学报, 2005, 54(5): 2207-2211. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.2207
    [18] 欧谷平, 宋 珍, 桂文明, 张福甲. 原子力显微镜与x射线光电子能谱对LiBq4/ITO和LiBq4/CuPc/ITO的表面分析. 物理学报, 2005, 54(12): 5717-5722. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.5717
    [19] 张向军, 孟永钢, 温诗铸. 原子力显微镜探针耦合变形下的微观扫描力研究. 物理学报, 2004, 53(3): 728-733. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.728
    [20] 孙润广, 齐浩, 张静. 脂质体结构特性的原子力显微镜研究. 物理学报, 2002, 51(6): 1203-1207. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.1203
计量
  • 文章访问数:  6035
  • PDF下载量:  138
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-05-21
  • 修回日期:  2020-07-06
  • 上网日期:  2020-10-22
  • 刊出日期:  2020-11-05

/

返回文章
返回