Research progress of quantum memory

Dou Jian-Peng; Li Hang; Pang Xiao-Ling; Zhang Chao-Ni; Yang Tian-Huai; Jin Xian-Min

doi:10.7498/aps.68.20190039

Abstract

Quantum technologies, for example, quantum communication and quantum computation, promise spectacular quantum enhanced advantages beyond what can be done classically. However, quantum states, as the element of quantum technologies, are very fragile and easily get lost to the environment, and meanwhile, their generation and quantum operations are mostly probabilistic. These problems make it exponentially hard to build long-distance quantum channels for quantum communication and large quantum systems for quantum computing. Quantum memory allows quantum states to be stored and retrieved in a programmable fashion, therefore providing an elegant solution to the probabilistic nature and associated limitation by coordinating asynchronous events. In the past decades, enormous advances in quantum memory have been made by developing various storage protocols and their physical implementations, and the quantum memory has gradually evolved from the initial conceptual demonstration to a nearly practical one. Aiming at being practicable for efficient synchronisation and physical scalability, an ideal quantum memory should meet several key features known as high efficiency, low noise level, large time bandwidth product (lifetime divided by pulse duration) and operating at room temperature. Here, we present the research status and development trends of this field by introducing some typical storage protocols. Among these protocols, a room-temperature broadband quantum memory is the most attractive due to its simplicity and practicability. However, at room temperature, noise becomes dominant and is a bottleneck problem that has impeded the realization of a real room-temperature broadband quantum memory in the last decades. Recently, the noise problem has been solved in two memory protocols, i.e. FORD (far off-resonance Duan-Lukin-Cirac-Zoller) protocol and ORCA (off-resonant cascaded absorption) protocol. In this paper, the working principles, the merits and demerits of various quantum memory protocols are illustrated. Furthermore, the approaches to eliminating noise and the applications of quantum memory are summarized.

Keywords:

quantum memory /
quantum information /
far off-resonance Duan-Lukin-Cirac-Zoller protocol /
room-temperature atoms

Authors and contacts

1.
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Optical Communication Systems and Networks, School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2.
Synergetic Innovation Center of Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China

Corresponding author: Jin Xian-Min, xianmin.jin@sjtu.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFA0303700), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11374211, 61734005, 11761141014, 11690033), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, China (Grant Nos. 15QA1402200, 16JC1400405, 17JC1400403), the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission, China (Grant Nos. 16SG09, 2017-01-07-00-02-E00049), and the National Young 1000 Talents Plan, China.

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Zoller P, Beth Th, Binosi D, Blatt R, Briegel H, Bruss D, Calarco T, Cirac J I, Deutsch D, Eisert J, Ekert A, Fabre C, Gisin N, Grangiere P, Grass M, Haroche S, Imamoglu A, Karlson A, Kempe J, Kouwenhoven L, Kröll S, Leuchs G, Lewenstein M, Loss D, Lütkenhaus N, Massar S, Mooij J E, Plenio M B, Polzik E, Popescu S, Rempe G, Sergienko A, Suter D, Twamley J, Wendin G, Werner R, Winter A, Wrachtrup J, Zeilinger A 2005 Eur. Phys. J. D 36 203 Google Scholar
[2]	O'Brien J L, Furusawa A, Vučković J 2009 Nat. Photon. 3 687 Google Scholar
[3]	Jin X M, Ren J G, Yang B, Yi Z H, Zhou F, Xu X F, Wang S K, Yang D, Hu Y F, Jiang S, Yang T, Yin H, Chen K, Peng C Z, Pan J W 2010 Nat. Photon. 4 376 Google Scholar
[4]	Gisin N, Thew R 2007 Nat. Photon. 1 165 Google Scholar
[5]	Ladd T D, Jelezko F, Laflamme R, Nakamura Y, Monroe C, O’Brien J L 2010 Nature 464 45 Google Scholar
[6]	Aspuru-Guzik A, Walther P 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 285 Google Scholar
[7]	Hau L V, Harris S E, Dutton Z, Behroozi C H 1999 Nature 397 594 Google Scholar
[8]	Liu C, Dutton Z, Behroozi C H, Hau L V 2001 Nature 409 490 Google Scholar
[9]	Phillips D F, Fleischhauer A, Mair A, Walsworth R L 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 783 Google Scholar
[10]	Wang L J, Kuzmich A, Dogariu A 2000 Nature 406 277 Google Scholar
[11]	Lvovsky A I, Sanders B C, Tittel W 2009 Nat. Photon. 3 706 Google Scholar
[12]	Hua Y L, Zhou Z Q, Li C F, Guo G C 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 020303 Google Scholar
[13]	Chanelière T, Matsukevich D N, Jenkins S D, Lan S Y, Kennedy T A B, Kuzmich A 2005 Nature 438 833 Google Scholar
[14]	Eisaman M D, André A, Massou F, Fleischhauer M, Zibrov A S, Lukin M D 2005 Nature 438 837 Google Scholar
[15]	Zhang H, Jin X M, Yang J, Dai H N, Yang S J, Zhao T M, Rui J, He Y, Jiang X, Yang F, Pan G S, Yuan Z S, Deng Y J, Chen Z B, Bao X H, Chen S, Zhao B, Pan J W 2011 Nature Photon. 5 628 Google Scholar
[16]	Duan L M, Lukin M D, Cirac J I, Zoller P 2001 Nature 414 413 Google Scholar
[17]	Kuzmich A, Bowen W P, Boozer A D, Boca A, Chou C W, Duan L M, Kimble H J 2003 Nature 423 731 Google Scholar
[18]	Yang S J, Wang X J, Bao X H, Pan J W 2016 Nat. Photon. 10 381 Google Scholar
[19]	Chrapkiewicz R, Dᶐbrowski M, Wasilewski W 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 063603 Google Scholar
[20]	Julsgaard B, Kozhekin A, Polzik E S 2001 Nature 413 400 Google Scholar
[21]	Julsgaard B, Sherson J, Cirac J I, Fiuŕašek J, Polzik E S 2004 Nature 432 482 Google Scholar
[22]	Moiseev S A, Kröll S 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 173601 Google Scholar
[23]	Alexander A L, Longdell J J, Sellars M J, Manson N B 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 043602 Google Scholar
[24]	Afzelius M, Simon C, de Riedmatten H, Gisin N 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 052329 Google Scholar
[25]	Reim K F, Nunn J, Jin X M, Michelberger P S, Champion T F M, England D G, Lee K C, Kolthammer W S, Langford N K, Walmsley I A 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 263602 Google Scholar
[26]	Ding D S, Zhang W, Zhou Z Y, Shi S, Shi B S, Guo G C 2015 Nat. Photon. 9 332 Google Scholar
[27]	Kaczmarek K T, Ledingham P M, Brecht B, Thomas S E, Thekkadath G S, Lazo-Arjona O, Munns J H D, Poem E, Feizpour A, Saunders D J, Nunn J, Walmsley I A 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 042316 Google Scholar
[28]	Finkelstein R, Poem E, Michel O, Lahad O, Firstenberg O 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 8598 Google Scholar
[29]	Lee K C, Sprague M R, Sussman B J, Nunn J, Langford N K, Jin X M, Champion T, Michelberger P, Reim K F, England D, Jaksch D, Walmsley I A 2011 Science 334 1253 Google Scholar
[30]	England D G, Fisher K A G, MacLean J P W, Bustard P J, Lausten R, Resch K J, Sussman B J 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 053602 Google Scholar
[31]	Maurer P C, Kucsko G, Latta C, Jiang L, Yao N Y, Bennett S D, Pastawski F, Hunger D, Chisholm N, Markham M, Twitchen D J, Cirac J I, Lukin M D 2012 Science 336 1283 Google Scholar
[32]	Ghobadi R, Wein S, KavianiH, Barclay P, Simon C 2017 arXiv: 1711.02027 [quant-ph]
[33]	Zhong M, Hedges M P, Ahlefeldt R L, Bartholomew J G, Beavan S E, Wittig S M, Longdell J J, Sellars M J 2015 Nature 517 177 Google Scholar
[34]	Yano R, Mitsunaga M, Uesugi N 1991 Opt. Lett. 16 1884 Google Scholar
[35]	Tang J S, Zhou Z Q, Wang Y T, Li Y L, Liu X, Hua Y L, Zou Y, Wang S, He D Y, Chen G, Sun Y N, Yu Y, Li M F, Zha G W, Ni H Q, Niu Z C, Li C F, Guo G C 2015 Nature Commun. 6 8652 Google Scholar
[36]	Kaneda F, Xu F, Chapman J, Kwiat P G 2017 Optica 4 1034 Google Scholar
[37]	Pang X L, Yang A L, Dou J P, Li H, Zhang C N, Poem E, Saunders D J, Tang H, Nunn J, Walmsley I A, Jin X M 2018 arXiv: 1803.07122 [quant-ph]
[38]	Fleischhauer M, Lukin M D 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 5094 Google Scholar
[39]	Hsiao Y F, Tsai P J, Chen H S, Lin S X, Hung C C, Lee C H, Chen Y H, Chen Y F, Yu I A, Chen Y C 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 183602 Google Scholar
[40]	Li J F, Wang Y F, Zhang S C, He J Y, Cheng A Q, Yan H, Zhu S L 2017 arXiv:1706.01404 [quant-ph]
[41]	Grosshans F, Grangier P 2001 Phys. Rev. A 64 010301 Google Scholar
[42]	Manz S, Fernholz T, Schmiedmayer J, Pan J W 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 040101 Google Scholar
[43]	Alkali D Line Data, Steck D A http://steck.us/alkalidata [2018-12-03]
[44]	Hétet G, Hosseini M, Sparkes B M, Oblak D, Lam P K, Buchler B C 2008 Opt. Lett. 33 2323 Google Scholar
[45]	Hosseini M, Sparkes B M, Hétet G, Longdell J J, Lam P K, Buchler B C 2009 Nature 461 241 Google Scholar
[46]	Cho Y W, Campbell G T, Everett J L, Bernu J, Higginbottom D B, Cao M T, Geng J, Robins N P, Lam P K, Buchler B C 2016 Optica 3 100 Google Scholar
[47]	Bashkansky M, Fatemi F K, Vurgaftman I 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 142 Google Scholar
[48]	Reim K F, Nunn J, Lorenz V O, Sussman B J, Lee K C, Langford N K, Jaksch D, Walmsley I A 2010 Nat. Photon. 4 218 Google Scholar
[49]	Sprague M R, Michelberger P S, Champion T F M, England D G, Nunn J, Jin X M, Kolthammer W S, Abdolvand A, Russell P St J, Walmsley I A 2014 Nat. Photon. 8 287 Google Scholar
[50]	Guo J X, Feng X T, Yang P Y, Yu Z F, Chen L Q, Yuan C H, Zhang W P 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 148 Google Scholar
[51]	Dou J P, Yang A L, Du M Y, Lao D, Gao J, Qiao L F, Li H, Pang X L, Feng Z, Tang H, Jin X M 2018 Commun. Phys. 1 55 Google Scholar
[52]	de Riedmatten H, Laurat J, Chou C W, Schomburg E W, Felinto D, Kimble H J 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 113603 Google Scholar
[53]	Chen S, Chen Y A, Zhao B, Yuan Z S, Schmiedmayer J, Pan J W 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 180505 Google Scholar
[54]	Bao X H, Reingruber A, Dietrich P, Rui J, Dück A, Strassel T, Li L, Liu N H, Zhao B, Pan J W 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 517 Google Scholar
[55]	Dou J P, Yang A L, Du M Y, Lao D, Li H, Pang X L, Gao J, Qiao L F, Tang H, Jin X M 2018 npj Quantum Information 4 31 Google Scholar
[56]	Zhao B, Chen Y A, Bao X H, Strassel T, Chuu C S, Jin X M, Schmiedmayer J, Yuan Z S, Chen S, Pan J W 2009 Nat. Phys. 5 95 Google Scholar
[57]	Novikova I, Phillips N B, Gorshkov A V 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 021802 Google Scholar
[58]	Nunn J, Thomas S, Munns J H D, Kaczmarek K T, Qiu C, Feizpour A, Poem E, Brecht B, Saunders D J, Ledingham P M, Reddy D V, Raymer M G, Walmsley I A 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 012338 Google Scholar
[59]	Saunders D J, Munns J H D, Champion T F M, Qiu C, Kaczmarek K T, Poem E, Ledingham P M, Walmsley I A, Nunn J 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 090501 Google Scholar
[60]	Guo J X, Chen L Q, Yang P Y, Li Z J, Wu Y, Feng X T, Yuan C H, Ou Z Y, Zhang W P 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 1752 Google Scholar
[61]	Radnaev A G, Dudin Y O, Zhao R, Jen H H, Jenkins S D, Kuzmich A, Kennedy T A B A 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 894 Google Scholar
[62]	Dudin Y O, Li L, Kuzmich A 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 031801 Google Scholar
[63]	Heinze G, Hubrich C, Halfmann T 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 033601 Google Scholar
[64]	Balabas M V, Karaulanov T, Ledbetter M P, Budker D 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 070801 Google Scholar
[65]	Zugenmaier M, Dideriksen K B, Spørensen A S, Albrecht B, Polzik E S 2018 Commun. Phys. 1 76 Google Scholar
[66]	Katz O, Firstenberg O 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 2074 Google Scholar
[67]	Nunn J, Langford N K, Kolthammer W S, Champion T F M, Sprague M R, Michelberger P S, Jin X M, England D G, Walmsley I A 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 133601 Google Scholar
[68]	Chen S, Chen Y A, Strassel T, Yuan Z S, Zhao B, Schmiedmayer J, Pan J W 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 173004 Google Scholar
[69]	Sangouard N, Simon C, de Riedmatten H, Gisin N 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 33 Google Scholar
[70]	Chen B, Qiu C, Chen S Y, Guo J X, Chen L Q, Ou Z Y, Zhang W P 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 043602 Google Scholar
[71]	Pan J W, Bouwmeester D, Weinfurter H, Zeilinger A 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 3891 Google Scholar
[72]	Cabrillo C, Cirac J I, García-Fernández P, Zoller P 1999 Phys. Rev. A 59 1025 Google Scholar
[73]	Duan L M, Cirac J I, Zoller P 2002 Phys. Rev. A 66 023818 Google Scholar
[74]	Gujarati T P, Wu Y K, Duan L M 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 033826 Google Scholar
[75]	Xu Z X, Wu Y L, Tian L, Chen L R, Zhang Z Y, Yan Z H, Li S J, Wang H, Xie C D, Peng K C 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 240503 Google Scholar
[76]	Yuan Z S, Chen Y A, Zhao B, Chen S, Schmiedmayer J, Pan J W 2008 Nature 454 1098 Google Scholar
[77]	Bernien H, Hensen B, Pfaff W, Koolstra G, Blok M S, Robledo L, Taminiau T H, Markham M, Twitchen D J, Childress L, Hanson R 2013 Nature 497 86 Google Scholar
[78]	Jing B, Wang X J, Yu Y, Sun P F, Jiang Y, Yang S J, Jiang W H, Luo X Y, Zhang J, Jiang X, Bao X H, Pan J W 2019 Nat. Photon. 10.1038/s41566-018-0342-x
[79]	Pu Y F, Wu Y K, Jiang N, Chang W, Li C, Zhang S, Duan L M 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 3931 Google Scholar
[80]	Fröwis F, Strassmann P C, Tiranov A, Gut C, Lavoie J, Brunner N, Bussières F, Afzelius M, Gisin N 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 907 Google Scholar
[81]	Campbell G, Hosseini M, Sparkes B M, Lam P K, Buchler B C 2012 New J. Phys. 14 033022 Google Scholar
[82]	Wasilewski W, Jensen K, Krauter H, Renema J J, Balabas M V, Polzik E S 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 133601 Google Scholar
[83]	Biedermann G W, McGuinness H J, Rakholia A V, Jau Y Y, Wheeler D R, Sterk J D, Burns G R 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 163601 Google Scholar
[84]	Pezzè L, Smerzi A, Oberthaler M K, Schmied R, Treutlein P 2018 Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 035005 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 基于钕离子掺杂钒酸钇晶体的量子存储(单光子来源于另一个光学平台的量子点)^[35]

Figure 1. Quantum memory based on a Nd³⁺:YVO₄ crystal^[35]. The single photons are emitted from a quantum dot on another optical table.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 基于冷原子EIT的量子存储(第一个磁光阱(MOT1)囚禁的雪茄型铷原子系综用来产生双光子对, 第二个磁光阱(MOT2)囚禁的铷原子系综作为量子存储器, 用来存储来自于MOT1的anti-Stokes光子)^[40]

Figure 2. EIT quantum memory based on cold atoms^[40]. The rubidium atomic ensemble in the first cigar-shaped magneto-optical trap (MOT1) is used to generate photon pairs. The rubidium atomic ensemble in MOT2 acts as a quantum memory, and is used to store the anti-Stokes photons from MOT1.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 磁场GEM的原理图^[45]　(a) 三能级系统; (b) 沿z方向线性频移的原子系综; (c) 光脉冲将要存入频移了的原子系综; (d) 在$\tau $时刻, 频率梯度反转, 在2$\tau $时刻出现光子回波; (e) 主要光路; (f) 施加的梯度磁场B_z

Figure 3. GEM schematic^[45]: (a) A three-level system; (b) an ensemble of atoms with linearly varying frequency shift in the z direction; (c) a pulse of light is stored in the frequency-shifted ensemble; (d) after reversal of the frequency gradient at time $\tau $, a photon echo emerges at time 2$\tau $; (e) the optical layout; (f) the applied magnetic field, B_z.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 远失谐拉曼存储　(a) 实验原理^[48]; (b) Λ型能级结构, 强的控制光(蓝线)激发出虚能级(黑色虚线), 并将信号光子(红线)耦合进铯原子系综或者将存储的信号光子读取出来^[48]; (c) 在空心光子晶体光纤中实现单光子量级的宽带光存储^[49]

Figure 4. Far off-resonance Raman memory: (a) Principle of experiment^[48]; (b)$\Lambda $-type energy level; the strong control light (blue line) induces a virtual energy level (black dashed line), and couples (retrieve) the signal photons (read lines) into (from) the caesium atomic ensemble^[48]; (c) broadband single-photon-level memory in a hollow-core photonic crystal fibre^[49].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 基于非共振梯形吸收的量子存储^[27]　(a) 信号光子(蓝线)和控制光(橙线)反向传播; (b) 具体采用的铯原子能级, 其中6D_5/2是存储态; (c) 实验装置图

Figure 5. Quantum memory protocol based on off-resonant cascaded absorption (ORCA)^[27]: (a) The weak input signal pulse (blue line) and strong control pulse (orange line) are counter-propagating; (b) the relevant caesium atomic levels, where the storage state is 6D_5/2; (c) the experimental setup.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 在实现宽带量子存储的历程中, 基于原子系综的量子存储的代表性工作^[51], 其中冷原子实验用黑色方块表示; 热原子实验用红色方块表示; ORCA表示梯形量子存储; FORD表示远失谐DLCZ量子存储

Figure 6. Milestone works of quantum memory towards broadband and quantum regime in atomic ensemble^[51]. The quantum memory experiments in cold atoms are shown in black diamond. The quantum memory experiments in room-temperature atoms are shown in red diamond. ORCA: Quantum memory based on off-resonant cascaded absorption. FORD: Quantum memory based on far off-resonance DLCZ protocol.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 7 FORD存储方案的原理图^[51]　(a) 实验装置图, 其中铯池置于3层磁屏蔽筒内并被加热到61.3 ℃, WP代表沃拉斯顿棱镜; QWP代表四分之一波片; HWP代表二分之一波片; PBS为偏振分束器; (b) FORD存储的写过程; (c) 读过程

Figure 7. Experimental principle^[51]. (a) Experimental setup. The caesium cell is packed in a three-layer magnetic shielding and is heated up to 61.3 ℃. WP, Wollaston prism; QWP, quarter-wave plate; HWP, half-wave plate; PBS, polarization beam splitter. (b) The write process of FORD quantum memory. (c) The read process.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 8 基于DLCZ方案建立纠缠的原理　(a) 一开始, 原子被制备在初态$\left| g \right\rangle $上, 然后写光与原子相互作用, 并以百分之几的概率产生Stokes光子; (b) 探测器1 (记为D1)和探测器2 (记为D2)探测到的光子有可能是来自于原子池A也有可能来自于原子池B, 在不能分辨Stokes光子是来源于原子池A还是B的前提下, 如果D1和D2两个探测器只有一个探测到光子且只探测到一个光子, 则原子池A和B之间存在纠缠; BS,光束分束器, 这里用的分束比是50 : 50; (c) 杨氏双缝干涉, 我们不能确定光子会从哪个狭缝通过

Figure 8. Generation of entanglement based on DLCZ protocol. (a) Initially, the atoms are prepared in state $\left| g \right\rangle $. Then a write light interacts with atoms and generates a Stokes photon with a probability of a few percent. (b) The photons detected by the detector 1 (denoted by D1) and detector 2 (denoted by D2) may come from either the cell A or the cell B. If the two detectors (D1 and D2) detect only one photon, and one cannot distinguish whether the photon is from the cell A or cell B, then the entanglement between the cell A and cell B is established. BS: beam spliter with a splitting ratio of 50 : 50. (c) Young’s double slit experiment. We can not distinguish which slit the photon passes through.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 9 基于DLCZ 方案的纠缠交换　(a) 读取过程, 读光将存储态$\left| s \right\rangle $读出为anti-Stokes光子; (b) 纠缠交换, 一开始, 原子池A和B存在纠缠, 原子池C和D存在纠缠, 原子池B和C在读光作用下有一定概率产生anti-Stokes光子, 在不能分辨光子是来源于原子池B还是C的前提下, 如果 D1和D2两个探测器只有一个探测到光子且只探测到一个光子, 则原子池A和D之间会产生纠缠; 以此类推, 便可在距离很远的两个原子系综之间建立纠缠

Figure 9. Entanglement swapping based on DLCZ protocol. The retrieval process. The read light retrieves the storage state $\left| s \right\rangle $ out as an anti-Stokes photon. (b) Entanglement swapping. Initially, cell A and B are entangled, cell C and D are entangled. Under the influence of read light, both the cell B and C will emit anti-Stokes photons with a certain probability. If the two detectors (D1 and D2) detect only one photon, and one can not distinguish whether the photon is from cell B or cell C, then the cell A and D are entangled. By analogy, one can establish an entanglement between two atomic ensembles separated by great distance.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 10 基于DLCZ方案的多光子同步, 其中在写光作用下, N个原子池随机产生Stokes光子(绿色圆)和与Stokes光子对应的集体激发态; 对每个原子池反复进行写操作, 直到产生Stokes光子为止; 当所有原子池都成功存储了集体激发态, 用读光将所有原子池内的集体激发态同时读取, 以产生N个时间上同步的anti-Stokes光子(蓝色圆)

Figure 10. Multiphoton synchronization based on DLCZ protocol. N cells interacting with write light can stochastically generate Stokes photons (green circles) and collective excitations. Repeatedly write the cell until a Stokes photon is generated. When each of the cells successfully stores a collective excitation, turn on the read light and retrieve all of the collective excitations out as N synchronous anti-Stokes photons (blue circles).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

表 1 各种基于原子系综的具有代表性的量子存储器及其重要参数^[51]

Table 1. Milestone works on quantum memory in atomic ensemble and key figures of merit^[51].

	具有代表性的工作	存储方案	存储器温度	互关联函数g⁽²⁾	带宽	时间带宽积
1	Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 083601 (2013)	EIT	300 μK	≤2	<5 MHz	74
2	Nature 438 837 (2005)	EIT	303—320 K	2—3	~1 MHz	~1
3	Nature 438 833 (2005)	EIT	~100 μK	8.5	12 MHz	120
4	Nat. Photon. 5 628 (2011)	EIT	~100 μK	10	5.5 MHz	13
5	Phys. Rev. A 75 040101 (2007)	DLCZ	333 K	1.3	1 MHz	NA
6	Nat. Phys. 5 95 (2009)	DLCZ	100 μK	37	<10 MHz	<10000
7	Opt. Lett. 37 142 (2012)	DLCZ	310 K	4	1 MHz	5
8	Nat. Photon. 10 381 (2016)	DLCZ	~100 μK	~37	<10 MHz	<2200000
9	Nature 461 241 (2009)	GEM	300K	≤2	1 MHz	NA
10	Nat. Commun. 174 (2011)	GEM	351 K	≤2	~1 MHz	≤10
11	Optica 3 100 (2016)	GEM	100 μK	≤2	<10 MHz	84
12	Nat. Photon. 4 218 (2010)	Far off-resonance Raman	335.5 K	≤2	1.5 GHz	18
13	Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 053603 (2011)	Far off-resonance Raman	335.5 K	≤2	1.5 GHz	2250
14	Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 090501 (2016)	Far off-resonance Raman	343 K	≤2	1 GHz	95
15	Nat. Photon. 9 332 (2015)	Raman memory	~100 μK	13.6	140 MHz	200
16	Nature 432 482 (2004)	Off-resonant Faraday interaction	300 K	≤2	NA	NA
17	Phys. Rev. A 97 042316 (2018)	Off-resonant cascaded absorption (ORCA)	364 K	120	1 GHz	5
18	Commun. Phys. 1 55 (2018)	Far off-resonance DLCZ (FORD)	334 K	28	537 MHz	700

DownLoad: CSV

[1]	Zoller P, Beth Th, Binosi D, Blatt R, Briegel H, Bruss D, Calarco T, Cirac J I, Deutsch D, Eisert J, Ekert A, Fabre C, Gisin N, Grangiere P, Grass M, Haroche S, Imamoglu A, Karlson A, Kempe J, Kouwenhoven L, Kröll S, Leuchs G, Lewenstein M, Loss D, Lütkenhaus N, Massar S, Mooij J E, Plenio M B, Polzik E, Popescu S, Rempe G, Sergienko A, Suter D, Twamley J, Wendin G, Werner R, Winter A, Wrachtrup J, Zeilinger A 2005 Eur. Phys. J. D 36 203 Google Scholar
[2]	O'Brien J L, Furusawa A, Vučković J 2009 Nat. Photon. 3 687 Google Scholar
[3]	Jin X M, Ren J G, Yang B, Yi Z H, Zhou F, Xu X F, Wang S K, Yang D, Hu Y F, Jiang S, Yang T, Yin H, Chen K, Peng C Z, Pan J W 2010 Nat. Photon. 4 376 Google Scholar
[4]	Gisin N, Thew R 2007 Nat. Photon. 1 165 Google Scholar
[5]	Ladd T D, Jelezko F, Laflamme R, Nakamura Y, Monroe C, O’Brien J L 2010 Nature 464 45 Google Scholar
[6]	Aspuru-Guzik A, Walther P 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 285 Google Scholar
[7]	Hau L V, Harris S E, Dutton Z, Behroozi C H 1999 Nature 397 594 Google Scholar
[8]	Liu C, Dutton Z, Behroozi C H, Hau L V 2001 Nature 409 490 Google Scholar
[9]	Phillips D F, Fleischhauer A, Mair A, Walsworth R L 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 783 Google Scholar
[10]	Wang L J, Kuzmich A, Dogariu A 2000 Nature 406 277 Google Scholar
[11]	Lvovsky A I, Sanders B C, Tittel W 2009 Nat. Photon. 3 706 Google Scholar
[12]	Hua Y L, Zhou Z Q, Li C F, Guo G C 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 020303 Google Scholar
[13]	Chanelière T, Matsukevich D N, Jenkins S D, Lan S Y, Kennedy T A B, Kuzmich A 2005 Nature 438 833 Google Scholar
[14]	Eisaman M D, André A, Massou F, Fleischhauer M, Zibrov A S, Lukin M D 2005 Nature 438 837 Google Scholar
[15]	Zhang H, Jin X M, Yang J, Dai H N, Yang S J, Zhao T M, Rui J, He Y, Jiang X, Yang F, Pan G S, Yuan Z S, Deng Y J, Chen Z B, Bao X H, Chen S, Zhao B, Pan J W 2011 Nature Photon. 5 628 Google Scholar
[16]	Duan L M, Lukin M D, Cirac J I, Zoller P 2001 Nature 414 413 Google Scholar
[17]	Kuzmich A, Bowen W P, Boozer A D, Boca A, Chou C W, Duan L M, Kimble H J 2003 Nature 423 731 Google Scholar
[18]	Yang S J, Wang X J, Bao X H, Pan J W 2016 Nat. Photon. 10 381 Google Scholar
[19]	Chrapkiewicz R, Dᶐbrowski M, Wasilewski W 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 063603 Google Scholar
[20]	Julsgaard B, Kozhekin A, Polzik E S 2001 Nature 413 400 Google Scholar
[21]	Julsgaard B, Sherson J, Cirac J I, Fiuŕašek J, Polzik E S 2004 Nature 432 482 Google Scholar
[22]	Moiseev S A, Kröll S 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 173601 Google Scholar
[23]	Alexander A L, Longdell J J, Sellars M J, Manson N B 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 043602 Google Scholar
[24]	Afzelius M, Simon C, de Riedmatten H, Gisin N 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 052329 Google Scholar
[25]	Reim K F, Nunn J, Jin X M, Michelberger P S, Champion T F M, England D G, Lee K C, Kolthammer W S, Langford N K, Walmsley I A 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 263602 Google Scholar
[26]	Ding D S, Zhang W, Zhou Z Y, Shi S, Shi B S, Guo G C 2015 Nat. Photon. 9 332 Google Scholar
[27]	Kaczmarek K T, Ledingham P M, Brecht B, Thomas S E, Thekkadath G S, Lazo-Arjona O, Munns J H D, Poem E, Feizpour A, Saunders D J, Nunn J, Walmsley I A 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 042316 Google Scholar
[28]	Finkelstein R, Poem E, Michel O, Lahad O, Firstenberg O 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 8598 Google Scholar
[29]	Lee K C, Sprague M R, Sussman B J, Nunn J, Langford N K, Jin X M, Champion T, Michelberger P, Reim K F, England D, Jaksch D, Walmsley I A 2011 Science 334 1253 Google Scholar
[30]	England D G, Fisher K A G, MacLean J P W, Bustard P J, Lausten R, Resch K J, Sussman B J 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 053602 Google Scholar
[31]	Maurer P C, Kucsko G, Latta C, Jiang L, Yao N Y, Bennett S D, Pastawski F, Hunger D, Chisholm N, Markham M, Twitchen D J, Cirac J I, Lukin M D 2012 Science 336 1283 Google Scholar
[32]	Ghobadi R, Wein S, KavianiH, Barclay P, Simon C 2017 arXiv: 1711.02027 [quant-ph]
[33]	Zhong M, Hedges M P, Ahlefeldt R L, Bartholomew J G, Beavan S E, Wittig S M, Longdell J J, Sellars M J 2015 Nature 517 177 Google Scholar
[34]	Yano R, Mitsunaga M, Uesugi N 1991 Opt. Lett. 16 1884 Google Scholar
[35]	Tang J S, Zhou Z Q, Wang Y T, Li Y L, Liu X, Hua Y L, Zou Y, Wang S, He D Y, Chen G, Sun Y N, Yu Y, Li M F, Zha G W, Ni H Q, Niu Z C, Li C F, Guo G C 2015 Nature Commun. 6 8652 Google Scholar
[36]	Kaneda F, Xu F, Chapman J, Kwiat P G 2017 Optica 4 1034 Google Scholar
[37]	Pang X L, Yang A L, Dou J P, Li H, Zhang C N, Poem E, Saunders D J, Tang H, Nunn J, Walmsley I A, Jin X M 2018 arXiv: 1803.07122 [quant-ph]
[38]	Fleischhauer M, Lukin M D 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 5094 Google Scholar
[39]	Hsiao Y F, Tsai P J, Chen H S, Lin S X, Hung C C, Lee C H, Chen Y H, Chen Y F, Yu I A, Chen Y C 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 183602 Google Scholar
[40]	Li J F, Wang Y F, Zhang S C, He J Y, Cheng A Q, Yan H, Zhu S L 2017 arXiv:1706.01404 [quant-ph]
[41]	Grosshans F, Grangier P 2001 Phys. Rev. A 64 010301 Google Scholar
[42]	Manz S, Fernholz T, Schmiedmayer J, Pan J W 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 040101 Google Scholar
[43]	Alkali D Line Data, Steck D A http://steck.us/alkalidata [2018-12-03]
[44]	Hétet G, Hosseini M, Sparkes B M, Oblak D, Lam P K, Buchler B C 2008 Opt. Lett. 33 2323 Google Scholar
[45]	Hosseini M, Sparkes B M, Hétet G, Longdell J J, Lam P K, Buchler B C 2009 Nature 461 241 Google Scholar
[46]	Cho Y W, Campbell G T, Everett J L, Bernu J, Higginbottom D B, Cao M T, Geng J, Robins N P, Lam P K, Buchler B C 2016 Optica 3 100 Google Scholar
[47]	Bashkansky M, Fatemi F K, Vurgaftman I 2012 Opt. Lett. 37 142 Google Scholar
[48]	Reim K F, Nunn J, Lorenz V O, Sussman B J, Lee K C, Langford N K, Jaksch D, Walmsley I A 2010 Nat. Photon. 4 218 Google Scholar
[49]	Sprague M R, Michelberger P S, Champion T F M, England D G, Nunn J, Jin X M, Kolthammer W S, Abdolvand A, Russell P St J, Walmsley I A 2014 Nat. Photon. 8 287 Google Scholar
[50]	Guo J X, Feng X T, Yang P Y, Yu Z F, Chen L Q, Yuan C H, Zhang W P 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 148 Google Scholar
[51]	Dou J P, Yang A L, Du M Y, Lao D, Gao J, Qiao L F, Li H, Pang X L, Feng Z, Tang H, Jin X M 2018 Commun. Phys. 1 55 Google Scholar
[52]	de Riedmatten H, Laurat J, Chou C W, Schomburg E W, Felinto D, Kimble H J 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 113603 Google Scholar
[53]	Chen S, Chen Y A, Zhao B, Yuan Z S, Schmiedmayer J, Pan J W 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 180505 Google Scholar
[54]	Bao X H, Reingruber A, Dietrich P, Rui J, Dück A, Strassel T, Li L, Liu N H, Zhao B, Pan J W 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 517 Google Scholar
[55]	Dou J P, Yang A L, Du M Y, Lao D, Li H, Pang X L, Gao J, Qiao L F, Tang H, Jin X M 2018 npj Quantum Information 4 31 Google Scholar
[56]	Zhao B, Chen Y A, Bao X H, Strassel T, Chuu C S, Jin X M, Schmiedmayer J, Yuan Z S, Chen S, Pan J W 2009 Nat. Phys. 5 95 Google Scholar
[57]	Novikova I, Phillips N B, Gorshkov A V 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 021802 Google Scholar
[58]	Nunn J, Thomas S, Munns J H D, Kaczmarek K T, Qiu C, Feizpour A, Poem E, Brecht B, Saunders D J, Ledingham P M, Reddy D V, Raymer M G, Walmsley I A 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 012338 Google Scholar
[59]	Saunders D J, Munns J H D, Champion T F M, Qiu C, Kaczmarek K T, Poem E, Ledingham P M, Walmsley I A, Nunn J 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 090501 Google Scholar
[60]	Guo J X, Chen L Q, Yang P Y, Li Z J, Wu Y, Feng X T, Yuan C H, Ou Z Y, Zhang W P 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 1752 Google Scholar
[61]	Radnaev A G, Dudin Y O, Zhao R, Jen H H, Jenkins S D, Kuzmich A, Kennedy T A B A 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 894 Google Scholar
[62]	Dudin Y O, Li L, Kuzmich A 2013 Phys. Rev. A 87 031801 Google Scholar
[63]	Heinze G, Hubrich C, Halfmann T 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 033601 Google Scholar
[64]	Balabas M V, Karaulanov T, Ledbetter M P, Budker D 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 070801 Google Scholar
[65]	Zugenmaier M, Dideriksen K B, Spørensen A S, Albrecht B, Polzik E S 2018 Commun. Phys. 1 76 Google Scholar
[66]	Katz O, Firstenberg O 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 2074 Google Scholar
[67]	Nunn J, Langford N K, Kolthammer W S, Champion T F M, Sprague M R, Michelberger P S, Jin X M, England D G, Walmsley I A 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 133601 Google Scholar
[68]	Chen S, Chen Y A, Strassel T, Yuan Z S, Zhao B, Schmiedmayer J, Pan J W 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 173004 Google Scholar
[69]	Sangouard N, Simon C, de Riedmatten H, Gisin N 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 33 Google Scholar
[70]	Chen B, Qiu C, Chen S Y, Guo J X, Chen L Q, Ou Z Y, Zhang W P 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 043602 Google Scholar
[71]	Pan J W, Bouwmeester D, Weinfurter H, Zeilinger A 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 3891 Google Scholar
[72]	Cabrillo C, Cirac J I, García-Fernández P, Zoller P 1999 Phys. Rev. A 59 1025 Google Scholar
[73]	Duan L M, Cirac J I, Zoller P 2002 Phys. Rev. A 66 023818 Google Scholar
[74]	Gujarati T P, Wu Y K, Duan L M 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 033826 Google Scholar
[75]	Xu Z X, Wu Y L, Tian L, Chen L R, Zhang Z Y, Yan Z H, Li S J, Wang H, Xie C D, Peng K C 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 240503 Google Scholar
[76]	Yuan Z S, Chen Y A, Zhao B, Chen S, Schmiedmayer J, Pan J W 2008 Nature 454 1098 Google Scholar
[77]	Bernien H, Hensen B, Pfaff W, Koolstra G, Blok M S, Robledo L, Taminiau T H, Markham M, Twitchen D J, Childress L, Hanson R 2013 Nature 497 86 Google Scholar
[78]	Jing B, Wang X J, Yu Y, Sun P F, Jiang Y, Yang S J, Jiang W H, Luo X Y, Zhang J, Jiang X, Bao X H, Pan J W 2019 Nat. Photon. 10.1038/s41566-018-0342-x
[79]	Pu Y F, Wu Y K, Jiang N, Chang W, Li C, Zhang S, Duan L M 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 3931 Google Scholar
[80]	Fröwis F, Strassmann P C, Tiranov A, Gut C, Lavoie J, Brunner N, Bussières F, Afzelius M, Gisin N 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 907 Google Scholar
[81]	Campbell G, Hosseini M, Sparkes B M, Lam P K, Buchler B C 2012 New J. Phys. 14 033022 Google Scholar
[82]	Wasilewski W, Jensen K, Krauter H, Renema J J, Balabas M V, Polzik E S 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 133601 Google Scholar
[83]	Biedermann G W, McGuinness H J, Rakholia A V, Jau Y Y, Wheeler D R, Sterk J D, Burns G R 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 163601 Google Scholar
[84]	Pezzè L, Smerzi A, Oberthaler M K, Schmied R, Treutlein P 2018 Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 035005 Google Scholar

[1]	Wang Yun-Fei, Zhou Ying, Wang Ying, Yan Hui, Zhu Shi-Liang. Performance and application analysis of quantum memory. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(20): 206701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231203
[2]	Zhou Zong-Quan. “Quantum memory” quantum computers and noiseless phton echoes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(7): 070305. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212245
[3]	Xing Xue-Yan, Li Xia-Xia, Chen Yu-Hui, Zhang Xiang-Dong. Optical echo memory based on photonic crystal cavities. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(11): 114201. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220083
[4]	Zhou Pai, Li Xia-Xia, Xing Xue-Yan, Chen Yu-Hui, Zhang Xiang-Dong. Quantum memory and manipulation based on erbium doped crystals. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(6): 064203. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211803
[5]	Wang Ye, Zhang Jing-Ning, Kim Kihwan. Single-ion qubit with coherence time exceeding 10 minutes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(3): 030306. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181729
[6]	Yang Tian-Shu, Zhou Zong-Quan, Li Chuan-Feng, Guo Guang-Can. Multimode solid-state quantum memory. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(3): 030303. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182207
[7]	Shi Bao-Sen, Ding Dong-Sheng, Zhang Wei, Li En-Ze. Raman protocol-based quantum memories. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(3): 034203. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182215
[8]	Li Ming, Chen Yang, Guo Guang-Can, Ren Xi-Feng. Recent progress of the application of surface plasmon polariton in quantum information processing. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(14): 144202. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.144202
[9]	Deng Rui-Jie, Yan Zhi-Hui, Jia Xiao-Jun. Analysis of electromagnetically induced transparency based on quantum memory of squeezed state of light. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(7): 074201. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.074201
[10]	Sun Ying, Zhao Shang-Hong, Dong Chen. Long distance measurement device independent quantum key distribution with quantum memories. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(14): 140304. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.140304
[11]	Li Zhuo, Xing Li-Juan. Error bases, group algebra and quantum codes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(13): 130306. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.130306
[12]	Xing Li-Juan, Li Zhuo, Zhang Wu-Jun. Strengthened quantum Hamming bound. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(5): 050304. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.050304
[13]	Wang Yun-Jiang, Bai Bao-Ming, Wang Xin-Mei. Feedback iterative decoding of sparse quantum codes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(11): 7591-7595. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.7591
[14]	Yin Ji-Wen, Xiao Jing-Lin, Yu Yi-Fu, Wang Zi-Wu. The effect of Coulomb potential to the decoherence of the parabolic quantum dot qubit. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(5): 2695-2698. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.2695
[15]	Xing Li-Juan, Li Zhuo, Bai Bao-Ming, Wang Xin-Mei. Encoding and decoding of quantum convolutional codes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(8): 4695-4699. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.4695
[16]	Li Zhuo, Xing Li-Juan. Quantum Generalized Reed-Solomon codes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(1): 28-30. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.28
[17]	Li Zhuo, Xing Li-Juan. A family of asymptotically good quantum codes based on code concatenation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(10): 5602-5606. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.5602
[18]	Zhang Quan, Zhang Er-Yang. . Acta Physica Sinica, 2002, 51(8): 1684-1689. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.1684
[19]	Zhang Quan, Tang Chao-Jing, Zhang Shen-Qiang. . Acta Physica Sinica, 2002, 51(7): 1439-1447. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.1439
[20]	Zhang Quan, Tang Chao-Jing, Gao Feng. . Acta Physica Sinica, 2002, 51(1): 15-20. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.15

Catalog

Vol. 68, Issue 3 - 2019-02-05

Metrics

Abstract views: 17236
PDF Downloads: 502
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板