Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Oxide-based memristive neuromorphic synaptic devices

Liu Yi-Chun Lin Ya Wang Zhong-Qiang Xu Hai-Yang

Citation:

Oxide-based memristive neuromorphic synaptic devices

Liu Yi-Chun, Lin Ya, Wang Zhong-Qiang, Xu Hai-Yang
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • Memristors are considered to be the potential candidate for simulating synapses due to their high density, low power consumption and continuously adjustable resistance. Metal oxide is an ideal choice for fabricating memristive devices with high performance due to its advantages of oxygen migration, easy adjustment of components and compatibility with traditional CMOS. In this review paper, the memristive behaviors and operation mechanism of oxide-based memristors including digital-type memristors and analog-type memristors are first introduced. We mainly summarize the cognitive functions simulated by analog-type memristive synapse, including nonlinear-transmission characteristic, synaptic plasticity, learning experience, and non-associative/associative learning. Then, the potential applications of memristive synapse in pattern recognition, sound localization, logic operation, flexibility/transferability and optoelectronic memristive synapse are introduced. Finally, we provide an outlook of the future possible studies of oxide-based memristive synapse in the relevant fields.
      Corresponding author: Liu Yi-Chun, ycliu@nenu.edu.cn
    [1]

    Chua L 1971 IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory 18 507Google Scholar

    [2]

    Strukov D B, Snider G S, Stewart D R, Williams R S 2008 Nature 453 80Google Scholar

    [3]

    Torrezan A C, Strachan J P, Medeiros-Ribeiro G, Williams R S 2011 Nanotechnology 22 485203Google Scholar

    [4]

    Choi B J, Torrezan A C, Norris K J, Miao F, Strachan J P, Zhang M X, Ohlberg D A, Kobayashi N P, Yang J J, Williams R S 2013 Nano Lett. 13 3213Google Scholar

    [5]

    Lee M J, Lee C B, Lee D, Lee S R, Chang M, Hur J H, Kim Y B, Kim C J, Seo D H, Seo S 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 625Google Scholar

    [6]

    Shi K, Xu H, Wang Z, Zhao X, Liu W, Ma J, Liu Y 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 223505Google Scholar

    [7]

    Govoreanu B, Kar G, Chen Y, Paraschiv V, Kubicek S, Fantini A, Radu I, Goux L, Clima S, Degraeve R 2011 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) p31.6.1

    [8]

    Borghetti J, Snider G S, Kuekes P J, Yang J J, Stewart D R, Williams R S 2010 Nature 464 873Google Scholar

    [9]

    Jo S H, Chang T, Ebong I, Bhadviya B B, Mazumder P, Lu W 2010 Nano Lett. 10 1297Google Scholar

    [10]

    Ohno T, Hasegawa T, Tsuruoka T, Terabe K, Gimzewski J K, Aono M 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 591Google Scholar

    [11]

    Hu S, Liu Y, Liu Z, Chen T, Wang J, Yu Q, Deng L, Yin Y, Hosaka S 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7522Google Scholar

    [12]

    Prezioso M, Merrikh-Bayat F, Hoskins B, Adam G C, Likharev K K, Strukov D B 2015 Nature 521 61Google Scholar

    [13]

    Kim S, Du C, Sheridan P, Ma W, Choi S, Lu W D 2015 Nano Lett. 15 2203Google Scholar

    [14]

    Liu C, Chen H, Hou X, Zhang H, Han J, Jiang Y G, Zeng X, Zhang D W, Zhou P 2019 Nat. Nanotechnol. 14 662Google Scholar

    [15]

    Wang M, Cai S, Pan C, Wang C, Lian X, Zhuo Y, Xu K, Cao T, Pan X, Wang B 2018 Nat. Electron. 1 130Google Scholar

    [16]

    Wang S, Zhang D W, Zhou P 2019 Sci. Bull. 64 1056Google Scholar

    [17]

    Vontobel P O, Robinett W, Kuekes P J, Stewart D R, Straznicky J, Williams R S 2009 Nanotechnology 20 425204Google Scholar

    [18]

    Kim S, Choi Y K 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 223508Google Scholar

    [19]

    Chang T, Jo S H, Lu W 2011 ACS Nano 5 7669Google Scholar

    [20]

    Yang Y C, Pan F, Liu Q, Liu M, Zeng F 2009 Nano Lett. 9 1636Google Scholar

    [21]

    Yang Y, Gao P, Li L, Pan X, Tappertzhofen S, Choi S, Waser R, Valov I, Lu W D 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4232Google Scholar

    [22]

    Chen J Y, Hsin C L, Huang C W, Chiu C H, Huang Y T, Lin S J, Wu W W, Chen L J 2013 Nano Lett. 13 3671Google Scholar

    [23]

    Cooper D, Baeumer C, Bernier N, Marchewka A, La Torre C, Dunin‐Borkowski R E, Menzel S, Waser R, Dittmann R 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1700212Google Scholar

    [24]

    Gao P, Wang Z, Fu W, Liao Z, Liu K, Wang W, Bai X, Wang E 2010 Micron 41 301Google Scholar

    [25]

    Kwon D H, Kim K M, Jang J H, Jeon J M, Lee M H, Kim G H, Li X S, Park G S, Lee B, Han S 2010 Nat. Nanotechnol. 5 148Google Scholar

    [26]

    Yang J J, Pickett M D, Li X, Ohlberg D A, Stewart D R, Williams R S 2008 Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 429Google Scholar

    [27]

    Wang Z Q, Xu H Y, Li X H, Yu H, Liu Y C, Zhu X J 2012 Adv. Funct. Mater. 22 2759Google Scholar

    [28]

    Yang R, Terabe K, Liu G, Tsuruoka T, Hasegawa T, Gimzewski J K, Aono M 2012 ACS Nano 6 9515Google Scholar

    [29]

    Yang R, Huang H M, Hong Q H, Yin X B, Tan Z H, Shi T, Zhou Y X, Miao X S, Wang X P, Mi S B 2018 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 1704455Google Scholar

    [30]

    Nian Y, Strozier J, Wu N, Chen X, Ignatiev A 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 146403Google Scholar

    [31]

    Du C, Ma W, Chang T, Sheridan P, Lu W D 2015 Adv. Funct. Mater. 25 4290Google Scholar

    [32]

    Dan Y, Poo M M 2004 Neuron 44 23Google Scholar

    [33]

    Zhang Z, Li T, Wu Y, Jia Y, Tan C, Xu X, Wang G, Lv J, Zhang W, He Y 2019 Adv. Mater. 31 1805769Google Scholar

    [34]

    Kim M K, Lee J S 2018 ACS Nano 12 1680Google Scholar

    [35]

    Atluri P P, Regehr W G 1996 J. Neurosci. 16 5661Google Scholar

    [36]

    Abbott L F, Nelson S B 2000 Nat. Neurosci. 3 1178Google Scholar

    [37]

    Debanne D, Inglebert Y, Russier M 2019 Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 54 73Google Scholar

    [38]

    Yan X, Zhao J, Liu S, Zhou Z, Liu Q, Chen J, Liu X Y 2018 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 1705320Google Scholar

    [39]

    Wang Z, Yin M, Zhang T, Cai Y, Wang Y, Yang Y, Huang R 2016 Nanoscale 8 14015Google Scholar

    [40]

    Covi E, Brivio S, Serb A, Prodromakis T, Fanciulli M, Spiga S 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) p393

    [41]

    Zhang L I, Tao H W, Holt C E, Harris W A, Poo M M 1998 Nature 395 37−44Google Scholar

    [42]

    Todd J J, Marois R 2004 Nature 428 751Google Scholar

    [43]

    Peterson L R 1966 Sci. Am. 215 90Google Scholar

    [44]

    Jonides J, Lewis R L, Nee D E, Lustig C A, Berman M G, Moore K S 2008 Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59 193Google Scholar

    [45]

    Abel T, Nguyen P V, Barad M, Deuel T A, Kandel E R, Bourtchouladze R 1997 Cell 88 615Google Scholar

    [46]

    Bliss T V, Collingridge G L 1993 Nature 361 31Google Scholar

    [47]

    Li Y, Chu J, Duan W, Cai G, Fan X, Wang X, Wang G, Pei Y 2018 ACS appl. Mater. Inter. 10 24598Google Scholar

    [48]

    Dongale T, Mullani N, Patil V, Tikke R, Pawar P, Mohite S, Teli A, Bagade A, Pawar K, Khot K 2018 J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 18 7758Google Scholar

    [49]

    Jiang R, Ma P, Han Z, Du X 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 9354Google Scholar

    [50]

    Ebbinghaus H 2013 Annals of neurosciences 20 155

    [51]

    Byrne J H, Hawkins R D 2015 C. S. H. Perspect. Biology 7 a021675

    [52]

    Cohen T E, Kaplan S W, Kandel E R, Hawkins R D 1997 J. Neurosci. 17 2886Google Scholar

    [53]

    Hawkins R D, Byrne J H 2015 C. S. H. Perspect. Biology 7 a021709

    [54]

    Yang X, Fang Y, Yu Z, Wang Z, Zhang T, Yin M, Lin M, Yang Y, Cai Y, Huang R 2016 Nanoscale 8 18897Google Scholar

    [55]

    Ziegler M, Soni R, Patelczyk T, Ignatov M, Bartsch T, Meuffels P, Kohlstedt H 2012 Adv. Funct. Mater. 22 2744Google Scholar

    [56]

    Crow T 2004 Learn. Memory 11 229Google Scholar

    [57]

    Hu S, Liu Y, Liu Z, Chen T, Yu Q, Deng L, Yin Y, Hosaka S 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 214502Google Scholar

    [58]

    Tan Z H, Yin X B, Yang R, Mi S B, Jia C L, Guo X 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 713Google Scholar

    [59]

    Yu S, Gao B, Fang Z, Yu H, Kang J, Wong H S P 2012 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) p10.4.1

    [60]

    Gao B, Bi Y, Chen H Y, Liu R, Huang P, Chen B, Liu L, Liu X, Yu S, Wong H S P 2014 ACS Nano 8 6998Google Scholar

    [61]

    Kim S, Choi B, Lim M, Yoon J, Lee J, Kim H D, Choi S J 2017 ACS Nano 11 2814Google Scholar

    [62]

    Wang Z, Ambrogio S, Balatti S, Ielmini D 2015 Front. Neurosci. 8 438

    [63]

    Lin Y, Wang C, Ren Y, Wang Z, Xu H, Zhao X, Ma J, Liu Y 2019 Small Methods 1900160Google Scholar

    [64]

    Grothe B, Pecka M, McAlpine D 2010 Physiol. Rev. 90 983Google Scholar

    [65]

    Middlebrooks J C, Green D M 1991 Annu. Rev. Psychol. 42 135Google Scholar

    [66]

    Hofman P M, Van Riswick J G, Van Opstal A J 1998 Nat. Neurosci. 1 417Google Scholar

    [67]

    Wang W, Pedretti G, Milo V, Carboni R, Calderoni A, Ramaswamy N, Spinelli A S, Ielmini D 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 eaat4752Google Scholar

    [68]

    Zhu X, Yang X, Wu C, Xiao N, Wu J, Yi X 2013 IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II: Exp. Briefs 60 682Google Scholar

    [69]

    Kvatinsky S, Satat G, Wald N, Friedman E G, Kolodny A, Weiser U C 2013 IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst. 22 2054

    [70]

    Kvatinsky S, Kolodny A, Weiser U C, Friedman E G 2011 IEEE 29th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD), p142

    [71]

    Lehtonen E, Laiho M 2009 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Nanoscale Architectures p33

    [72]

    Yan X, Zhou Z, Zhao J, Liu Q, Wang H, Yuan G, Chen J 2018 Nano Res. 11 1183Google Scholar

    [73]

    Lin Y, Zeng T, Xu H, Wang Z, Zhao X, Liu W, Ma J, Liu Y 2018 Adv. Electron. Mater. 4 1800373Google Scholar

    [74]

    Chen S, Lou Z, Chen D, Shen G 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 1705400Google Scholar

    [75]

    Zhou F, Zhou Z, Chen J, Choy T H, Wang J, Zhang N, Lin Z, Yu S, Kang J, Wong H S P 2019 Nat. Nanotechnol. 14 776Google Scholar

    [76]

    Lee M, Lee W, Choi S, Jo J W, Kim J, Park S K, Kim Y H 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1700951Google Scholar

    [77]

    Gao S, Liu G, Yang H, Hu C, Chen Q, Gong G, Xue W, Yi X, Shang J, Li R W 2019 ACS Nano 13 2634

    [78]

    Takeno Y 2016 ECS Transactions 75 3

    [79]

    Deisseroth K 2011 Nat. Methods 8 26Google Scholar

    [80]

    Yizhar O, Fenno L E, Davidson T J, Mogri M, Deisseroth K 2011 Neuron 71 9Google Scholar

    [81]

    Pastrana E 2010 Nat. Methods 8 24

  • 图 1  (a) 基于Pt/TiO2/Pt结构的数字型忆阻变行为, 插图为器件结构示意图[2]; (b) 基于Pd/WOx/W结构的模拟型忆阻器忆阻行为, 插图为器件结构示意图[19]

    Figure 1.  (a) The digital memristive hebavior obtained in Pt/TiO2/Pt memristor. The insert is the corresponding structure diagram of the device.[2] (b) the analog memristive habevior obtained in Pd/WOx/W memristor. The insert is the corresponding structure diagram of the device[19]

    图 2  (a, b) Ag/ZnO:Mn/Pt结构忆阻器原位透射电镜图; (c, d) 导电通道内部和外部的能谱图[20]

    Figure 2.  (a, b) The in situ TEM images of Ag/ZnO:Mn/Pt memristor. (c, d) EDX spectrum collected inside and outside of conductive channels[20]

    图 3  (a-c) Pt/ZnO/Pt 结构忆阻器不同加电时间下的原位透射电镜图; (d-f) 不同扫描时间下的I -V曲线[22]

    Figure 3.  (a-c) The in situ TEM images of Pt/ZnO/Pt memristor under the voltage sweep with differernt time. (d-f) the corresponding IV measurements of Pt/ZnO/Pt memristor under the voltage sweep with differernt time[22]

    图 4  左侧(a-b)Pt/TiO2-x/Ti器件结构示意图, 其中Pt/TiO2-x界面为肖特基接触, Ti/TiO2-x界面为欧姆接触; 右侧(a-d)电极与TiO2-x层势垒的变化[26]

    Figure 4.  In the left: (a, b) Structure diagram of Pt/TiO2-x/Ti memristor, in which Pt/TiO2-x presents Schottky contact and Ti/TiO2-x is Ohmic contact. In the right: (a-d) the modulation of barrier between the electrode and TiO2-x layer[26]

    图 5  惠普实验室提出的忆阻模型 (a) 忆阻器结构示意图; (b, c) 计算机模拟忆阻器在电压作用下的电学响应[2]

    Figure 5.  The memristive model proposed by HP’s lab: (a) Schematic diagram of memristor, (b, c) computer simulated the electrical response of memristor under voltage sweep[2]

    图 6  (a) 非晶InGaZnO基忆阻器件与神经突触结构对应图; (b) 单一脉冲在忆阻器中诱导产生的兴奋性后电流; (c) 不同温度下突触权重的衰减行为, 实现为单e指数拟合曲线; (d) 基于方程3拟合$ -\ln(\tau'^{-1})$)与1000/T之间的关系[27]

    Figure 6.  (a) The structural diagram of the bilayer α-InGaZnO memristor and a schematic illustration of the synapse between neurons. (b) the EPSC induced by a single pulse. (c) memory decay curves recorded after different numbers of stimuli (dots), the data was fitted by single exponential function. (d) plot of $ -\ln(\tau'^{-1})$ against 1000/T following equation 3[27]

    图 7  (a) 基于Pd/WOx/W结构忆阻器的电学特性; (b) 导电细丝数目模型机制图[31]

    Figure 7.  (a) The I-V characteristic of Pd/WOx/W memristor. (b) memtistive mechanism diagram of modulating conductive filaments[31]

    图 8  (a) 界面肖特基势垒调制忆阻模型示意图; (b) 基于Pt/SrTiO3/Nb-SrTiO3结构忆阻器在脉冲模式下的阻变行为[29]

    Figure 8.  (a) Schematic diagram of the memristive model by modulating Schottky barrier. (b) the potentiation and depression of Pt/SrTiO3/Nb-SrTiO3 memristor obtained under positive and negative pulses, respectively[29]

    图 9  忆阻器的非线性传输特性 (a), (b) 器件电流-电压特性曲线; (c) 在连续的增强/抑制脉冲下, 器件电导上升/下降[27]

    Figure 9.  The nonlinear transmission characteristic of memtistor. (a), (b) I-V characteristic of the device measurement under positive and negative voltage sweep, respectively. (c) the continuously increase/decrease of device conductance under positive/negative pulse[27]

    图 10  (a) 在忆阻器中实现的PPF现象: PPF变化量和时间间隔的关系[31]; (b) 浦肯野细胞(Purkinje cell)和颗粒细胞(granule cell)之间神经突触的双脉冲易化行为; 插图为连续两个胞外刺激引起的兴奋性后电流变化[35]

    Figure 10.  (a) PPF behaviors obtained in memristor: the change of PPF as the function of the time interval.[31] (b) the PPF measured in the synapse between Purkinje cell and granule cell. The insert is the EPSC induced by two extracellular stimuli[35]

    图 11  (a) 基于忆阻器模拟放电时间依赖可塑性(相对突触权重和相对刺激时间的依赖性)[27]; (b) 老鼠海马体神经元中相对刺激时间的依赖性[41]

    Figure 11.  (a) STDP behaviors obtained by the memristor.[27] (b) STDP behaviors measured in hippocampal neurons of the rats[41]

    图 12  (a) 短时记忆向长时记忆转变示意图; (b) 艾宾浩斯遗忘曲线

    Figure 12.  (a) Schematic diagram of the transition from short-term memory (STM) to long-term memory (LTM). (b) the Ebbinghaus Forgetting Curve.

    图 13  Lu研究组模拟短时可塑性向长时可塑性的转变 (a, b) 施加的脉冲信号和器件的响应电流; (c) 不同数量刺激后, 记忆的保持量; (d) 弛豫过程的初始电流及拟合时间参数随刺激次数的变化; (e) 长短时转变过程中, 器件内部结构变化示意图[19]

    Figure 13.  STM-to-LTM transition obtained by Lu’s group. (a, b) the response current of the device under pulse stimulus. (c) memory retention data recorded after different numbers of identical stimuli (dots) and fitted curves using the SEF (solid lines). (d) characteristic relaxation time (τ) plotted with respect to the number of stimulations (N). (e) schematic of the structural change to the memristor during the transition[19]

    图 14  突触仿生器件的 “经验式行为”和器件运行动力学模型 (a) 突触权重随脉冲刺激近线性增加; (b) 电导自发弛豫过程; (c) 基于中间态的再次学习过程; 插图为器件运行的氧离子迁移扩散机制[27]

    Figure 14.  The “learning-experience” behaviors, and the dynamic model of device operation. (a) Nearly linear increase of the synaptic weight with consecutive stimuli. (b) the spontaneous decay of the conductivity. (c) re-stimulation process from the mid-state. The inset illustrates an oxygen ion migration/diffusion model of device operation[27]

    图 15  (a) 生物系统中的习惯化和去习惯化行为; (b) 基于HfOx忆阻器实现的习惯化和去习惯化行为[54]

    Figure 15.  (a) Habituation and dishabituation behaviors in biological systems. (b) schematic of stimulus trains used for the measurement of habituation/dishabituation and the measured device current changes under the application of stimulus trains[54]

    图 16  (a) 巴普洛夫条件反射的原型; (b) 基于忆阻器构建的巴普洛夫条件反射模拟电路; (c) 在不同时序关系的条件和非条件刺激下实验测量结果[58]

    Figure 16.  (a) Prototype of the Pavlovian conditioning. (b) memristive circuit with electrical US and CS to mimic the Pavlovian conditioning. (c) the experimental results under the conditions of different intervals between conditioned and unconditioned stimulus[58]

    图 17  (a) 分别基于数字型和模拟型行为的图像演变过程; (b) 由数字型和模拟型忆阻器构成的混合人工神经网络; (c) 人工神经网络中数字型比例对图像识别准确性的影响[63]

    Figure 17.  (a) Evolution of images during the learning process for the initial, intermediate, and final states based on Digital resistive switching (D-RS) and analog resistive switching (A-RS) behaviors, respectively. (b) hybrid ANN composed of A-RS memristors and D-RS memristors. (c) accuracy as a function of number of epochs for the hybrid ANN at four different A-RS proportions[63]

    图 18  基于时空处理的声音定位 (a) 双耳效应示意图; (b) 2 × 2神经网络通过双耳时差进行声音定位; (c) 实验用到的左右耳声音波形; (d) 对应突触前神经元的轴突电位; (e) 不同时差信号引起的突触后神经元电位; (f) 不同声音方位下突触后神经元电位的测量和计算结果[67]

    Figure 18.  Sound localization based on space-time processing. (a) Schematic illustration of binaural effect. (b) schematic structure of a 2 × 2 SNN to detect the sound direction from the ITD. (c) experimental sound waveforms of left and right ears, (d) corresponding axon potential of the two PREs, and (e) vint for the two POSTs with their corresponding difference. (f) measured and calculated Vint as a function of sound azimuth revealing analog information about the sound propagation direction[67]

    图 19  (a) 实现逻辑电路的交叉阵列; (b) IMP逻辑运算电路; (c) NAND逻辑运算电路[8]

    Figure 19.  (a) The memristors crossbar for logical circuit. (b) IMP logical circuit. (c) NAND logical circuit[8]

    图 20  (a) 利用水溶方法制备可转移的Pt/WOx/Ti忆阻神经突触器件示意图; (b) 转移至打印纸、3D玻璃半球、果胶和PDMS衬底上的器件实物图; (c) 转移至不同衬底上的忆阻器件STDP学习功能[73]

    Figure 20.  (a) Schematic diagrams of the fabrication process for the transferable Pt/WOx/Ti synaptic devices using water-dissolution method. (b) the pictures of devices that are transferred on flexible printing paper, glass dome hemisphere with 3D surface, pectin and PDMS substrate. (c) the obtained STDP behaviors of the devices on different substrates[73]

    图 21  (a) 光激励下ITO/Nb:SrTiO3基光电神经突触器件运行机理示意图; (b) 在光脉冲对下异质结的典型光响应特性; (c) 对脉冲易化度随脉冲间隔变化规律[77]

    Figure 21.  (a) Photoresponsive characteristics of the ITO/Nb:SrTiO3 heterojunction artificial optoelectronic synapse under pulsed light stimuli. (b) photoresponsive characteristic of the heterojunction under a light pulse pair. (c) the variation of PPF index with the interval of light pulse pairs[77]

    图 22  基于ITO/Nb:SrTiO3异质结人工光电神经突触模拟视觉神经系统 (a) 用波长编码输入图像的感知和记忆过程. (b) 用强度编码输入图像的感知和记忆过程. (c) 低频率刺激下的图像感知和记忆过程[77]

    Figure 22.  Mimicry of human visual memory using the ITO/Nb:SrTiO3 heterojunction artificial optoelectronic synapse. (a) The detection and memory process of image encoded by light wavelength. (b) the detection and memory process of image encoded by light intensity. (c) the detection and memory process of image with low stimulating frequency.

  • [1]

    Chua L 1971 IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory 18 507Google Scholar

    [2]

    Strukov D B, Snider G S, Stewart D R, Williams R S 2008 Nature 453 80Google Scholar

    [3]

    Torrezan A C, Strachan J P, Medeiros-Ribeiro G, Williams R S 2011 Nanotechnology 22 485203Google Scholar

    [4]

    Choi B J, Torrezan A C, Norris K J, Miao F, Strachan J P, Zhang M X, Ohlberg D A, Kobayashi N P, Yang J J, Williams R S 2013 Nano Lett. 13 3213Google Scholar

    [5]

    Lee M J, Lee C B, Lee D, Lee S R, Chang M, Hur J H, Kim Y B, Kim C J, Seo D H, Seo S 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 625Google Scholar

    [6]

    Shi K, Xu H, Wang Z, Zhao X, Liu W, Ma J, Liu Y 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 223505Google Scholar

    [7]

    Govoreanu B, Kar G, Chen Y, Paraschiv V, Kubicek S, Fantini A, Radu I, Goux L, Clima S, Degraeve R 2011 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) p31.6.1

    [8]

    Borghetti J, Snider G S, Kuekes P J, Yang J J, Stewart D R, Williams R S 2010 Nature 464 873Google Scholar

    [9]

    Jo S H, Chang T, Ebong I, Bhadviya B B, Mazumder P, Lu W 2010 Nano Lett. 10 1297Google Scholar

    [10]

    Ohno T, Hasegawa T, Tsuruoka T, Terabe K, Gimzewski J K, Aono M 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 591Google Scholar

    [11]

    Hu S, Liu Y, Liu Z, Chen T, Wang J, Yu Q, Deng L, Yin Y, Hosaka S 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7522Google Scholar

    [12]

    Prezioso M, Merrikh-Bayat F, Hoskins B, Adam G C, Likharev K K, Strukov D B 2015 Nature 521 61Google Scholar

    [13]

    Kim S, Du C, Sheridan P, Ma W, Choi S, Lu W D 2015 Nano Lett. 15 2203Google Scholar

    [14]

    Liu C, Chen H, Hou X, Zhang H, Han J, Jiang Y G, Zeng X, Zhang D W, Zhou P 2019 Nat. Nanotechnol. 14 662Google Scholar

    [15]

    Wang M, Cai S, Pan C, Wang C, Lian X, Zhuo Y, Xu K, Cao T, Pan X, Wang B 2018 Nat. Electron. 1 130Google Scholar

    [16]

    Wang S, Zhang D W, Zhou P 2019 Sci. Bull. 64 1056Google Scholar

    [17]

    Vontobel P O, Robinett W, Kuekes P J, Stewart D R, Straznicky J, Williams R S 2009 Nanotechnology 20 425204Google Scholar

    [18]

    Kim S, Choi Y K 2008 Appl. Phys. Lett. 92 223508Google Scholar

    [19]

    Chang T, Jo S H, Lu W 2011 ACS Nano 5 7669Google Scholar

    [20]

    Yang Y C, Pan F, Liu Q, Liu M, Zeng F 2009 Nano Lett. 9 1636Google Scholar

    [21]

    Yang Y, Gao P, Li L, Pan X, Tappertzhofen S, Choi S, Waser R, Valov I, Lu W D 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4232Google Scholar

    [22]

    Chen J Y, Hsin C L, Huang C W, Chiu C H, Huang Y T, Lin S J, Wu W W, Chen L J 2013 Nano Lett. 13 3671Google Scholar

    [23]

    Cooper D, Baeumer C, Bernier N, Marchewka A, La Torre C, Dunin‐Borkowski R E, Menzel S, Waser R, Dittmann R 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1700212Google Scholar

    [24]

    Gao P, Wang Z, Fu W, Liao Z, Liu K, Wang W, Bai X, Wang E 2010 Micron 41 301Google Scholar

    [25]

    Kwon D H, Kim K M, Jang J H, Jeon J M, Lee M H, Kim G H, Li X S, Park G S, Lee B, Han S 2010 Nat. Nanotechnol. 5 148Google Scholar

    [26]

    Yang J J, Pickett M D, Li X, Ohlberg D A, Stewart D R, Williams R S 2008 Nat. Nanotechnol. 3 429Google Scholar

    [27]

    Wang Z Q, Xu H Y, Li X H, Yu H, Liu Y C, Zhu X J 2012 Adv. Funct. Mater. 22 2759Google Scholar

    [28]

    Yang R, Terabe K, Liu G, Tsuruoka T, Hasegawa T, Gimzewski J K, Aono M 2012 ACS Nano 6 9515Google Scholar

    [29]

    Yang R, Huang H M, Hong Q H, Yin X B, Tan Z H, Shi T, Zhou Y X, Miao X S, Wang X P, Mi S B 2018 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 1704455Google Scholar

    [30]

    Nian Y, Strozier J, Wu N, Chen X, Ignatiev A 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 146403Google Scholar

    [31]

    Du C, Ma W, Chang T, Sheridan P, Lu W D 2015 Adv. Funct. Mater. 25 4290Google Scholar

    [32]

    Dan Y, Poo M M 2004 Neuron 44 23Google Scholar

    [33]

    Zhang Z, Li T, Wu Y, Jia Y, Tan C, Xu X, Wang G, Lv J, Zhang W, He Y 2019 Adv. Mater. 31 1805769Google Scholar

    [34]

    Kim M K, Lee J S 2018 ACS Nano 12 1680Google Scholar

    [35]

    Atluri P P, Regehr W G 1996 J. Neurosci. 16 5661Google Scholar

    [36]

    Abbott L F, Nelson S B 2000 Nat. Neurosci. 3 1178Google Scholar

    [37]

    Debanne D, Inglebert Y, Russier M 2019 Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 54 73Google Scholar

    [38]

    Yan X, Zhao J, Liu S, Zhou Z, Liu Q, Chen J, Liu X Y 2018 Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 1705320Google Scholar

    [39]

    Wang Z, Yin M, Zhang T, Cai Y, Wang Y, Yang Y, Huang R 2016 Nanoscale 8 14015Google Scholar

    [40]

    Covi E, Brivio S, Serb A, Prodromakis T, Fanciulli M, Spiga S 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) p393

    [41]

    Zhang L I, Tao H W, Holt C E, Harris W A, Poo M M 1998 Nature 395 37−44Google Scholar

    [42]

    Todd J J, Marois R 2004 Nature 428 751Google Scholar

    [43]

    Peterson L R 1966 Sci. Am. 215 90Google Scholar

    [44]

    Jonides J, Lewis R L, Nee D E, Lustig C A, Berman M G, Moore K S 2008 Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59 193Google Scholar

    [45]

    Abel T, Nguyen P V, Barad M, Deuel T A, Kandel E R, Bourtchouladze R 1997 Cell 88 615Google Scholar

    [46]

    Bliss T V, Collingridge G L 1993 Nature 361 31Google Scholar

    [47]

    Li Y, Chu J, Duan W, Cai G, Fan X, Wang X, Wang G, Pei Y 2018 ACS appl. Mater. Inter. 10 24598Google Scholar

    [48]

    Dongale T, Mullani N, Patil V, Tikke R, Pawar P, Mohite S, Teli A, Bagade A, Pawar K, Khot K 2018 J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 18 7758Google Scholar

    [49]

    Jiang R, Ma P, Han Z, Du X 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 9354Google Scholar

    [50]

    Ebbinghaus H 2013 Annals of neurosciences 20 155

    [51]

    Byrne J H, Hawkins R D 2015 C. S. H. Perspect. Biology 7 a021675

    [52]

    Cohen T E, Kaplan S W, Kandel E R, Hawkins R D 1997 J. Neurosci. 17 2886Google Scholar

    [53]

    Hawkins R D, Byrne J H 2015 C. S. H. Perspect. Biology 7 a021709

    [54]

    Yang X, Fang Y, Yu Z, Wang Z, Zhang T, Yin M, Lin M, Yang Y, Cai Y, Huang R 2016 Nanoscale 8 18897Google Scholar

    [55]

    Ziegler M, Soni R, Patelczyk T, Ignatov M, Bartsch T, Meuffels P, Kohlstedt H 2012 Adv. Funct. Mater. 22 2744Google Scholar

    [56]

    Crow T 2004 Learn. Memory 11 229Google Scholar

    [57]

    Hu S, Liu Y, Liu Z, Chen T, Yu Q, Deng L, Yin Y, Hosaka S 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 214502Google Scholar

    [58]

    Tan Z H, Yin X B, Yang R, Mi S B, Jia C L, Guo X 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 713Google Scholar

    [59]

    Yu S, Gao B, Fang Z, Yu H, Kang J, Wong H S P 2012 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) p10.4.1

    [60]

    Gao B, Bi Y, Chen H Y, Liu R, Huang P, Chen B, Liu L, Liu X, Yu S, Wong H S P 2014 ACS Nano 8 6998Google Scholar

    [61]

    Kim S, Choi B, Lim M, Yoon J, Lee J, Kim H D, Choi S J 2017 ACS Nano 11 2814Google Scholar

    [62]

    Wang Z, Ambrogio S, Balatti S, Ielmini D 2015 Front. Neurosci. 8 438

    [63]

    Lin Y, Wang C, Ren Y, Wang Z, Xu H, Zhao X, Ma J, Liu Y 2019 Small Methods 1900160Google Scholar

    [64]

    Grothe B, Pecka M, McAlpine D 2010 Physiol. Rev. 90 983Google Scholar

    [65]

    Middlebrooks J C, Green D M 1991 Annu. Rev. Psychol. 42 135Google Scholar

    [66]

    Hofman P M, Van Riswick J G, Van Opstal A J 1998 Nat. Neurosci. 1 417Google Scholar

    [67]

    Wang W, Pedretti G, Milo V, Carboni R, Calderoni A, Ramaswamy N, Spinelli A S, Ielmini D 2018 Sci. Adv. 4 eaat4752Google Scholar

    [68]

    Zhu X, Yang X, Wu C, Xiao N, Wu J, Yi X 2013 IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II: Exp. Briefs 60 682Google Scholar

    [69]

    Kvatinsky S, Satat G, Wald N, Friedman E G, Kolodny A, Weiser U C 2013 IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. (VLSI) Syst. 22 2054

    [70]

    Kvatinsky S, Kolodny A, Weiser U C, Friedman E G 2011 IEEE 29th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD), p142

    [71]

    Lehtonen E, Laiho M 2009 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Nanoscale Architectures p33

    [72]

    Yan X, Zhou Z, Zhao J, Liu Q, Wang H, Yuan G, Chen J 2018 Nano Res. 11 1183Google Scholar

    [73]

    Lin Y, Zeng T, Xu H, Wang Z, Zhao X, Liu W, Ma J, Liu Y 2018 Adv. Electron. Mater. 4 1800373Google Scholar

    [74]

    Chen S, Lou Z, Chen D, Shen G 2018 Adv. Mater. 30 1705400Google Scholar

    [75]

    Zhou F, Zhou Z, Chen J, Choy T H, Wang J, Zhang N, Lin Z, Yu S, Kang J, Wong H S P 2019 Nat. Nanotechnol. 14 776Google Scholar

    [76]

    Lee M, Lee W, Choi S, Jo J W, Kim J, Park S K, Kim Y H 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1700951Google Scholar

    [77]

    Gao S, Liu G, Yang H, Hu C, Chen Q, Gong G, Xue W, Yi X, Shang J, Li R W 2019 ACS Nano 13 2634

    [78]

    Takeno Y 2016 ECS Transactions 75 3

    [79]

    Deisseroth K 2011 Nat. Methods 8 26Google Scholar

    [80]

    Yizhar O, Fenno L E, Davidson T J, Mogri M, Deisseroth K 2011 Neuron 71 9Google Scholar

    [81]

    Pastrana E 2010 Nat. Methods 8 24

  • [1] Guo Hui-Meng, Liang Yan, Dong Yu-Jiao, Wang Guang-Yi. Simplification of Chua corsage memristor and hardware implementation of its neuron circuit. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(7): 070501. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222013
    [2] Wen Xin-Yu, Wang Ya-Sai, He Yu-Hui, Miao Xiang-Shui. Memristive brain-like computing. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(14): 140501. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220666
    [3] Hu Wei, Liao Jian-Bin, Du Yong-Qian. An analytic modeling strategy for memristor cell applicable to large-scale memristive networks. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(17): 178505. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210116
    [4] Shi Chen-Yang, Min Guang-Zong, Liu Xiang-Yang. Research progress of protein-based memristor. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(17): 178702. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200617
    [5] Xu Wei, Wang Yu-Qi, Li Yue-Feng, Gao Fei, Zhang Miao-Cheng, Lian Xiao-Juan, Wan Xiang, Xiao Jian, Tong Yi. Design of novel memristor-based neuromorphic circuit and its application in classical conditioning. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(23): 238501. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191023
    [6] Shao Nan,  Zhang Sheng-Bing,  Shao Shu-Yuan. Mathematical model of memristor with sensory memory. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(1): 018501. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181577
    [7] Shao Nan, Zhang Sheng-Bing, Shao Shu-Yuan. Analysis of memristor model with learning-experience behavior. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(19): 198502. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190808
    [8] Chen Yi-Hao, Xu Wei, Wang Yu-Qi, Wan Xiang, Li Yue-Feng, Liang Ding-Kang, Lu Li-Qun, Liu Xin-Wei, Lian Xiao-Juan, Hu Er-Tao, Guo Yu-Feng, Xu Jian-Guang, Tong Yi, Xiao Jian. Fabrication of synaptic memristor based on two-dimensional material MXene and realization of both long-term and short-term plasticity. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(9): 098501. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182306
    [9] Yu Zhi-Qiang, Liu Min-Li, Lang Jian-Xun, Qian Kai, Zhang Chang-Hua. Resistive switching characteristics and resistive switching mechanism of Au/TiO2/FTO memristor. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(15): 157302. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180425
    [10] Wu Jie-Ning, Wang Li-Dan, Duan Shu-Kai. A memristor-based time-delay chaotic systems and pseudo-random sequence generator. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(3): 030502. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.030502
    [11] Xu Ya-Ming, Wang Li-Dan, Duan Shu-Kai. A memristor-based chaotic system and its field programmable gate array implementation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(12): 120503. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.120503
    [12] Shao Nan, Zhang Sheng-Bing, Shao Shu-Yuan. Modification of memristor model with synaptic characteristics and mechanism analysis of the model's learning-experience behavior. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(12): 128503. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.128503
    [13] Yuan Ze-Shi, Li Hong-Tao, Zhu Xiao-Hua. A digital-analog hybrid random number generator based on memristor. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(24): 240503. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.240503
    [14] Meng Fan-Yi, Duan Shu-Kai, Wang Li-Dan, Hu Xiao-Fang, Dong Zhe-Kang. An improved WOx memristor model with synapse characteristic analysis. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(14): 148501. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.148501
    [15] Guo Yu-Quan, Duan Shu-Kai, Wang Li-Dan. Influence of length parameter on the characteristics of nanoscale titanium oxide memristor. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(10): 108502. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.108502
    [16] Liu Dong-Qing, Cheng Hai-Feng, Zhu Xuan, Wang Nan-Nan, Zhang Chao-Yang. Research progress of memristors and memristive mechanism. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(18): 187301. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.187301
    [17] Xu Hui, Tian Xiao-Bo, Bu kai, Li Qing-Jiang. Influence of temperature change on conductive characteristics of titanium oxide memristor. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(9): 098402. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.098402
    [18] Tian Xiao-Bo, Xu Hui, Li Qing-Jiang. Influence of the cross section area on the conductive characteristics of titanium oxide memristor. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(4): 048401. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.048401
    [19] Xu Bi-Rong. A simplest parallel chaotic system of memristor. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(19): 190506. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.190506
    [20] Jia Lin-Nan, Huang An-Ping, Zheng Xiao-Hu, Xiao Zhi-Song, Wang Mei. Progress of memristor modulated by interfacial effect. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(21): 217306. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.217306
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  14781
  • PDF Downloads:  469
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  15 August 2019
  • Accepted Date:  19 August 2019
  • Available Online:  19 August 2019
  • Published Online:  20 August 2019

/

返回文章
返回