Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Spin noise spectroscopy of cesium vapor in micron-scale cell

Guo Zhi-Chao Zhang Tong-Yao Zhang Jing

Citation:

Spin noise spectroscopy of cesium vapor in micron-scale cell

Guo Zhi-Chao, Zhang Tong-Yao, Zhang Jing
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • In this paper, the spin dynamics and broadening mechanism of cesium vapor in cells without buffer gas is investigated by means of spin noise spectroscopy. In a macro atomic vapor cell, the lineshape of detuning frequency spectrum of spin relaxation rate is of Gaussian distribution. For a micron-scaled vapor cell with strong spatial locality, the lineshape of detuning frequency spectrum of spin relaxation rate is of Lorentzian distribution. The parameter dependence of detuning frequency spectrum of spin relaxation rate, such as temperature, is studied quantitatively. The detuning frequency spectrum of the spin relaxation rate is measured experimentally to be broadened by $ \sim $4 GHz, which is obviously larger than the unhomogeneous Doppler broadening of $ \sim $500 MHz for a macro atomic vapor cell. At the same time, the detuning frequency spectrum of total noise in the two atomic vapor cells is studied. In the macro atomic vapor cell, the total noise intensity strongly relies on the detuning frequency of the laser with respect to the atomic resonance transition. In the micron-scaled vapor cell, due to the strong homogeneous broadening, the center of the detuning frequency spectrum of the total noise is observed to dip. Finally, a simplified physical model is established to compute the broadening of the micron-scaled vapor cell. The homogeneous broadening of atoms is explained experimentally and theoretically in the micron-scaled vapor cell.
      Corresponding author: Guo Zhi-Chao, sxdxguozhichao@gmail.com
    • Funds: Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016 YFA0301602) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61574087)
    [1]

    Kubo R 1966 Rep. Prog. Phys. 29 255Google Scholar

    [2]

    Römer M, Hübner J, Oestreich M 2007 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78 103903Google Scholar

    [3]

    Sørensen J L, Hald J, Polzik E S 1998 Phys Rev. Lett. 80 3487Google Scholar

    [4]

    Crooker S A, Rickel D G, Balatsky A V, Smith D L 2004 Nature 431 49Google Scholar

    [5]

    Oestreich M, Römer M, Haug R J, Hägele D 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 216603Google Scholar

    [6]

    Sterin P, Wiegand J, Hübner Jens, Oestreich M 2018 Phys. Rev. Appl. 9 034003Google Scholar

    [7]

    Lucivero V G, Jiménez-Martínez Ricardo, Kong J, Mitchell M W 2016 Phys. Rev. A. 93 053802Google Scholar

    [8]

    史平, 马健, 钱轩, 姬杨, 李伟 2017 物理学报 66 017201Google Scholar

    Shi P, Ma J, Qian X, Ji Y, Li W 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 017201Google Scholar

    [9]

    Roy D, Yang L, Crooker S A, Sinitsyn N A 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 9573Google Scholar

    [10]

    Petrov M Y, Kamenskii A N, Zapasskii V S, Bayer M, Greilich A 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 125202Google Scholar

    [11]

    Cronenberger S, Scalbert D 2016 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87 093111Google Scholar

    [12]

    李晨, 丁畅, 张桐耀, 曹丹华, 吴裕斌, 陈院森 2017 量子光学学报 23 228

    Li C, Ding C, Zhang T Y, Cao D H, Wu Y B, Chen Y S 2017 J. Quant. Opt. 23 228

    [13]

    Müller G M, Römer M, Hübner J, Oestreich M 2010 App. Phys. Lett. 97 192109Google Scholar

    [14]

    Poltavtsev S V, Ryzhov I I, Glazov M M, Kozlov G G, Zapasskii V S, Kavokin A V, Lagoudakis P G, Smirnov D S, Ivchenko E L 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 081304Google Scholar

    [15]

    Pershin Y V, Slipko V A, Roy D, Sinitsyn N A 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 202405Google Scholar

    [16]

    Dahbashi R, Hübner J, Berski F, Pierz K, Oestreich M 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 156601Google Scholar

    [17]

    Yang L, Glasenapp P, Greilich A, Reuter D, Wieck A D, Yakovlev D R, Bayer M, Crooker S A 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4949Google Scholar

    [18]

    Crooker S A, Brandt J, Sandfort C, Greilich A, Yakovlev D R, Reuter D, Wieck A D, Bayer M 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 036601Google Scholar

    [19]

    Kozlov G G, Ryzhov I I, Zapasskii V S 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 043810Google Scholar

    [20]

    Kozlov G G, Ryzhov I I, Zapasskii V S 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 013848Google Scholar

    [21]

    Keaveney J 2013 Ph. D. Dissertation (Durham: Durham University)

    [22]

    Ma J, Shi P, Qian X, Li W, Ji Y 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 117203Google Scholar

    [23]

    Hübner J, Berski F, Dahbashi R, Oestreich M 2014 Phys. Status. Solidi. 251 1824Google Scholar

    [24]

    Petrov M Y, Ryzhov I I, Smirnov D S, Belyaev L Y, Potekhin R A, Glazov M M, Kulyasov V N, Kozlov G G, Aleksandrov E B, Zapasskii1 V S 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 032502Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zapasskii V S, Greilich A, Crooker S A, Li Y, Kozlov G G, Yakovlev D R, Reuter D, Wieck A D, Bayer M 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 176601Google Scholar

    [26]

    Ghosh R K 2009 Ph. D. Dissertation (Princeton: Princeton University)

    [27]

    Rajroop J 2018 Ph. D. Dissertation (London: University College London)

    [28]

    Christopher J F 2005 Atomic Physics (Oxford: Oxford University Press) p142

    [29]

    Ma J, Shi P, Qian X, Shang Y, Ji Y 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 10238Google Scholar

    [30]

    Buckingham A D, Stephens P J 1966 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 17 399Google Scholar

    [31]

    Zapasskii V S 2013 Adv. Opt. Photon. 5 131Google Scholar

    [32]

    尚雅轩, 马健, 史平, 钱轩, 李伟, 姬杨 2018 物理学报 67 087201Google Scholar

    Shang Y X, Ma J, Shi P, Qian X, Li W, Ji Y 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 087201Google Scholar

    [33]

    Chalupczak W, Godun R M 2011 Phys. Rev. A. 83 032512Google Scholar

    [34]

    Zhang W J, You L X, Li H, Huang J, Lv C L, Zhang L, Liu X Y, Wu J J, Wang Z, Xie X M 2017 Sci: China Phys. Mech. Astron. 60 120314Google Scholar

    [35]

    Yang W H, Shi S P, Wang Y J, Ma W G, Zheng Y H, Peng K C 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 21Google Scholar

  • 图 1  (a)自旋噪声谱的实验原理图(P是偏振片, B是外加磁场, Wollaston prism是沃拉斯顿棱镜, BP是平衡零拍探测器, FFT是快速傅里叶变换); (b)气室1中经典的133Cs自旋噪声谱(激光失谐频率ΩD2 = + 600 MHz于D2线(62S1/2 (F = 4) → 62P3/2), 原子气室温度T = 296 K, 激光功率P = 500 μW, 外加磁场B = 5 G); (c) 133Cs的D2跃迁线和基态超精细结构

    Figure 1.  (a) Schematic of the experimental apparatus (P-polarizer, B-magnetic fields, BP-balanced homodyne detector, FFT-fast Fourier transform); (b) typical spin noise spectrum of 133Cs in cell 1 (the laser is detuned ΩD2 = + 600 MHz from the D2 transition (62S1/2 (F = 4) → 62P3/2). The temperature of atomic cell is 296 K. The laser power P = 500 μW. Magnetic field B = 5 G); (c) D2 line transition and ground-state hyperfine structure of 133Cs.

    图 2  气室1中磁场相关的自旋噪声谱 (a)不同磁场下的自旋噪声谱(黑线)和拟合曲线(红线); (b)自旋噪声谱中心频率(蓝圆圈)与外场关系图, 以及拟合曲线(红线); 激光失谐频率ΩD2 = + 600 MHz于D2线(62S1/2 (F = 4) → 62P3/2), 激光功率为P = 500 μW, 原子气室温度T = 296 K

    Figure 2.  Magnetic-field dependent spin noise spectrum in cell 1: (a) Spin noise spectrum (black lines) and fitting curve (red lines) versus the magnetic fields; (b) dependence of center frequency of spin noise spectrum on magnetic fields. The blue circles are the experimental data. The red line is the fitting curve. The laser is detuned ΩD2 = + 600 MHz from the D2 transition (62S1/2 (F = 4) → 62P3/2). The laser power P = 500 μW. The temperature of atomic cell is 296 K.

    图 3  气室1中自旋噪声谱的失谐频率依赖关系 (a)自旋弛豫速率与失谐频率的对应关系图; (b)总噪声与失谐频率的对应关系图; 激光失谐频率在D2线(62S1/2 (F = 3) → 62P3/2)附近, 激光功率P = 500 μW, 外磁场B = 15 G, 实验数据为(蓝圆圈)和拟合曲线(红线), 原子气室温度T = 296 K

    Figure 3.  Detuning frequency dependent spin noise spectrum in cell 1: (a) Spin relaxation rate versus the detuning frequency; (b) total noise versus the detuning frequency. The laser is detuned from the D2 transition (62S1/2 (F = 3) → 62P3/2). The laser power P = 500 μW. Magnetic field B = 15 G. The blue circles are the experimental data. The red line is the fitting curve. The temperature of atomic cell is 296 K.

    图 4  气室2中自旋噪声谱的失谐频率依赖关系 (a) T = 387 K时自旋弛豫速率与失谐频率的关系; (b) T = 431 K时自旋弛豫速率与失谐频率的关系; (c) T = 387 K时总噪声与失谐频率的关系; (d) T = 431 K时总噪声与失谐频率的关系; 激光失谐频率在D2线(62S1/2 (F = 3) → 2P3/2)附近, 激光功率为P = 5 mW, 蓝圆圈表示实验数据, 红线为拟合曲线

    Figure 4.  The detuning frequency dependent spin noise spectrum in cell 2: (a) Spin relaxation rate versus the detuning frequency at T = 387 K; (b) spin relaxation rate versus the detuning frequency at T = 431 K; (c) total noise versus the detuning frequency at T = 387 K; (d) total noise versus the detuning frequency at T = 431 K. The laser is detuned from the D2 transition (62S1/2 (F = 3) → 62P3/2). The laser power P = 5 mW. The blue circles are the experimental data, and the red line is the fitting curve.

  • [1]

    Kubo R 1966 Rep. Prog. Phys. 29 255Google Scholar

    [2]

    Römer M, Hübner J, Oestreich M 2007 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78 103903Google Scholar

    [3]

    Sørensen J L, Hald J, Polzik E S 1998 Phys Rev. Lett. 80 3487Google Scholar

    [4]

    Crooker S A, Rickel D G, Balatsky A V, Smith D L 2004 Nature 431 49Google Scholar

    [5]

    Oestreich M, Römer M, Haug R J, Hägele D 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 216603Google Scholar

    [6]

    Sterin P, Wiegand J, Hübner Jens, Oestreich M 2018 Phys. Rev. Appl. 9 034003Google Scholar

    [7]

    Lucivero V G, Jiménez-Martínez Ricardo, Kong J, Mitchell M W 2016 Phys. Rev. A. 93 053802Google Scholar

    [8]

    史平, 马健, 钱轩, 姬杨, 李伟 2017 物理学报 66 017201Google Scholar

    Shi P, Ma J, Qian X, Ji Y, Li W 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 017201Google Scholar

    [9]

    Roy D, Yang L, Crooker S A, Sinitsyn N A 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 9573Google Scholar

    [10]

    Petrov M Y, Kamenskii A N, Zapasskii V S, Bayer M, Greilich A 2018 Phys. Rev. B 97 125202Google Scholar

    [11]

    Cronenberger S, Scalbert D 2016 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87 093111Google Scholar

    [12]

    李晨, 丁畅, 张桐耀, 曹丹华, 吴裕斌, 陈院森 2017 量子光学学报 23 228

    Li C, Ding C, Zhang T Y, Cao D H, Wu Y B, Chen Y S 2017 J. Quant. Opt. 23 228

    [13]

    Müller G M, Römer M, Hübner J, Oestreich M 2010 App. Phys. Lett. 97 192109Google Scholar

    [14]

    Poltavtsev S V, Ryzhov I I, Glazov M M, Kozlov G G, Zapasskii V S, Kavokin A V, Lagoudakis P G, Smirnov D S, Ivchenko E L 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 081304Google Scholar

    [15]

    Pershin Y V, Slipko V A, Roy D, Sinitsyn N A 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 102 202405Google Scholar

    [16]

    Dahbashi R, Hübner J, Berski F, Pierz K, Oestreich M 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 156601Google Scholar

    [17]

    Yang L, Glasenapp P, Greilich A, Reuter D, Wieck A D, Yakovlev D R, Bayer M, Crooker S A 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4949Google Scholar

    [18]

    Crooker S A, Brandt J, Sandfort C, Greilich A, Yakovlev D R, Reuter D, Wieck A D, Bayer M 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 036601Google Scholar

    [19]

    Kozlov G G, Ryzhov I I, Zapasskii V S 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 043810Google Scholar

    [20]

    Kozlov G G, Ryzhov I I, Zapasskii V S 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 013848Google Scholar

    [21]

    Keaveney J 2013 Ph. D. Dissertation (Durham: Durham University)

    [22]

    Ma J, Shi P, Qian X, Li W, Ji Y 2016 Chin. Phys. B 25 117203Google Scholar

    [23]

    Hübner J, Berski F, Dahbashi R, Oestreich M 2014 Phys. Status. Solidi. 251 1824Google Scholar

    [24]

    Petrov M Y, Ryzhov I I, Smirnov D S, Belyaev L Y, Potekhin R A, Glazov M M, Kulyasov V N, Kozlov G G, Aleksandrov E B, Zapasskii1 V S 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 032502Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zapasskii V S, Greilich A, Crooker S A, Li Y, Kozlov G G, Yakovlev D R, Reuter D, Wieck A D, Bayer M 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 176601Google Scholar

    [26]

    Ghosh R K 2009 Ph. D. Dissertation (Princeton: Princeton University)

    [27]

    Rajroop J 2018 Ph. D. Dissertation (London: University College London)

    [28]

    Christopher J F 2005 Atomic Physics (Oxford: Oxford University Press) p142

    [29]

    Ma J, Shi P, Qian X, Shang Y, Ji Y 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 10238Google Scholar

    [30]

    Buckingham A D, Stephens P J 1966 Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 17 399Google Scholar

    [31]

    Zapasskii V S 2013 Adv. Opt. Photon. 5 131Google Scholar

    [32]

    尚雅轩, 马健, 史平, 钱轩, 李伟, 姬杨 2018 物理学报 67 087201Google Scholar

    Shang Y X, Ma J, Shi P, Qian X, Li W, Ji Y 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 087201Google Scholar

    [33]

    Chalupczak W, Godun R M 2011 Phys. Rev. A. 83 032512Google Scholar

    [34]

    Zhang W J, You L X, Li H, Huang J, Lv C L, Zhang L, Liu X Y, Wu J J, Wang Z, Xie X M 2017 Sci: China Phys. Mech. Astron. 60 120314Google Scholar

    [35]

    Yang W H, Shi S P, Wang Y J, Ma W G, Zheng Y H, Peng K C 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 21Google Scholar

  • [1] From Transverse Field Ising Chain to Quantum E8 Integrable Model. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211836
    [2] Lu Xin, Xie Meng-Lin, Liu Jing, Jin Wei, Li Chun, Georgios Lefkidis, Wolfgang Hübner. First-principles study of ultrafast spin dynamics in FemB20 (m = 1, 2) clusters. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(12): 127505. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210056
    [3] Wang Xiao, Yang Jia-Hao, Wu Jian-Da. From the transverse field Ising chain to the quantum E8 integrable model. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(23): 230504. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211836
    [4] Zhang Peng, Liu Zheng, Dai Jian-Ming, Yang Zhao-Rong, Su Fu-Hai. Anisotropic resonance absorptions induced by high magnetic field in ZnCr2Se4. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(20): 207501. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201507
    [5] Yang Yu-Lin, Bai Le-Le, Zhang Lu-Lu, He Jun, Wen Xin, Wang Jun-Min. Experimental investigation of spin noise spectroscopy of rubidium atomic ensemble. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(23): 233201. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201103
    [6] Yu Yang,  Zhang Wen-Jie,  Zhao Wan-Ying,  Lin Xian,  Jin Zuan-Ming,  Liu Wei-Min,  Ma Guo-Hong. Dynamics of A-exciton and spin relaxation in WS2 and WSe2 monolayer. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(1): 017201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181769
    [7] Huang Rui, Li Chun, Jin Wei, Georgios Lefkidis, Wolfgang Hübner. Ultrafast spin dynamics in double-magnetic-center endohedral fullerene Y2C2@C82-C2(1). Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(2): 023101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181887
    [8] Xiang Tian, Cheng Liang, Qi Jing-Bo. Ultrafast charge and spin dynamics on topological insulators. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(22): 227202. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191433
    [9] Gong Dong-Liang, Luo Hui-Qian. Antiferromagnetic order and spin dynamics in iron-based superconductors. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(20): 207407. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181543
    [10] Shang Ya-Xuan, Ma Jian, Shi Ping, Qian Xuan, Li Wei, Ji Yang. Measurement and improvement of rubidium spin noise spectroscopy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(8): 087201. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180098
    [11] Shi Ping, Ma Jian, Qian Xuan, Ji Yang, Li Wei. Signal-to-noise ratio of spin noise spectroscopy in rubidium vapor. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(1): 017201. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.017201
    [12] Zhu Meng-Long, Dong Yu-Lan, Zhong Hai-Zheng, He Jun. Exciton spin relaxation dynamics in CdTe quantum dots at room temperature. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(12): 127202. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.127202
    [13] Li Xia, Feng Dong-Hai, Pan Xian-Qun, Jia Tian-Qing, Shan Lu-Fan, Deng Li, Sun Zhen-Rong. Room-temperature ultrafast spin dynamics in colloidal CdSe quantum dots. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(20): 207202. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.207202
    [14] Li Chun, Yang Fan, Georgios Lefkidis, Wolfgang Hübner. Laser-induced ultrafast spin dynamics research on magnetic nanostructures. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(1): 017802. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.017802
    [15] Sun Zheng, Xu Zhong-Ying, Ruan Xue-Zhong, Ji Yang, Sun Bao-Quan, Ni Hai-Qiao. Spin relaxation dynamics in InAs monolayer and submonolayer. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(5): 2958-2961. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.2958
    [16] Wu Yu, Jiao Zhong-Xing, Lei Liang, Wen Jin-Hui, Lai Tian-Shu, Lin Wei-Zhu. Electron spin relaxation and momentum relaxation in semiconductor quantum wells. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(6): 2961-2965. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.2961
    [17] Qin Ji-Hong, Xu Su-Fen, Feng Shi-Ping. Spin dynamics in quasi-one-dimensional strongly correlated zigzag materials. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(10): 5511-5515. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.5511
    [18] Guo Li-Jun, Wüstenberg Jan-Peter, Oleksiy Andreyev, Bauer Michael, Aeschlimann Martin. Spin dynamics of GaAs(100) by two-photon photoemission. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(7): 3200-3205. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.3200
    [19] Liu Bin, Liang Ying, Feng Shi-Ping. Spin dynamics in doped spatially anisotropic triangular antiferromagnets. Acta Physica Sinica, 2004, 53(10): 3540-3544. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.3540
    [20] MA BEN-KUN. SPIN-LATTICE RELAXATION. Acta Physica Sinica, 1965, 21(7): 1419-1436. doi: 10.7498/aps.21.1419
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  8308
  • PDF Downloads:  127
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  23 October 2019
  • Accepted Date:  27 November 2019
  • Published Online:  05 February 2020

/

返回文章
返回