Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Phase field simulation of misfit strain manipulating domain structure and ferroelectric properties in PbZr(1–x)TixO3 thin films

Liu Di Wang Jing Wang Jun-Sheng Huang Hou-Bing

Citation:

Phase field simulation of misfit strain manipulating domain structure and ferroelectric properties in PbZr(1–x)TixO3 thin films

Liu Di, Wang Jing, Wang Jun-Sheng, Huang Hou-Bing
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • Ferroelectric domain structures and ferroelectric properties in the hetero-epitaxially constrained ferroelectric thin films can be manipulated by substrate misfit strain. In this work, three kinds of phase structures of PbZr(1–x)TixO3 thin films, including tetragonal, tetragonal- rhombohedral-mixed and rhombohedral phases, are investigated. Firstly, the ferroelectric domain structures at different substrate misfit biaxial strains are obtained by the phase-field simulation. Then we calculate the polarization-electric field hysteresis loops at different misfit strains, and obtain the coercive field, saturation polarization, and remnant polarization. In the tetragonal PbZr(1–x)TixO3 (x = 0.8) thin film, compressive strain contributes to the formation of out-of-plane c1/c2 domain, and tensile strain favors in-plane a1/a2 domain formation. With the increase of compressive strain, the tetragonal phase and the rhombohedral phase coexist in PbZr(1–x)TixO3 (x = 0.48) film near the morphotropic phase boundary, while the tensile strain reduces the rhombohedral domain size. In the rhombohedral PbZr(1–x)TixO3 (x = 0.2) film, the rhombohedral domains are steady states under compressive strain and tensile strain. As the misfit strain changes from –1.0% to 1.0%, the value of the coercive field, saturation polarization and remnant polarization decrease. Among them, for tetragonal-rhombohedral mixed phase, the reductions of saturation field and remnant polarization are larger than for tetragonal phase and rhombohedral phase. The coercive field of mixed phase decreases rapidly under the compressive strain, but deceases slowly under the tensile strain. It is worth noting that the remnant polarization decreases faster than the saturation polarization in three components of ferroelectric thin film. Due to the electromechanical coupling, when x = 0.48 at the morphotropic phase boundary it is shown that the remnant polarization reduction is faster than those of the other two types of ferroelectric thin films, and the small coercive field is obtained in the case of large tensile strain. Therefore, tensile strain can effectively improve the energy storage efficiency in ferroelectric thin films, and the efficiency of x = 0.48 thin film increases significantly compared with that of x = 0.8 or 0.2 thin film. Both the ratio of rhombohedral/tetragonal phase and the domain size will play a significant role in ferroelectric performance. Therefore, our results contribute to the understanding of the electromechanical coupling mechanism of PbZr(1–x)TixO3, and provide guidance for the experimental design of ferroelectric functional thin film materials.
      Corresponding author: Huang Hou-Bing, hbhuang@bit.edu.cn
    [1]

    Xu F, Trolier-McKinstry S, Ren W, Xu B, Xie Z L, Hemker K J 2001 J. Appl. Phys. 89 1336Google Scholar

    [2]

    Kim D J, Maria J P, Kingon A I, Streiffer S K 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 93 5568Google Scholar

    [3]

    Karthik J, Martin L 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 024102Google Scholar

    [4]

    Karthik J, Damodaran A R, Martin L W 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 167601Google Scholar

    [5]

    赵晓英, 刘世建, 褚君浩, 戴宁, 胡古今 2008 物理学报 57 5968Google Scholar

    Zhao X Y, Liu S J, Chu J H, Dai N, Hu G J 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 5968Google Scholar

    [6]

    Arimoto Y, Ishiwara H 2004 MRS Bull. 29 823Google Scholar

    [7]

    Ganapathi K L, Rath M, Rao M S R 2019 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 34 055016Google Scholar

    [8]

    Won S S, Seo H, Kawahara M, Glinsek S, Lee J, Kim Y, Jeong C K, Kingon A I, Kim S H 2019 Nano Energy 55 182Google Scholar

    [9]

    Hoshyarmanesh H, Ebrahimi N, Jafari A, Hoshyarmanesh P, Kim M, Park H H 2019 Sensors 19 13Google Scholar

    [10]

    Gupta R, Gupta V, Tomar M 2020 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 105 104723Google Scholar

    [11]

    Rath M, Varadarajan E, Premkumar S, Shinde S, Natarajan V, Rao M S R 2019 Ferroelectrics 551 17Google Scholar

    [12]

    Yao Z H, Song Z, Hao H, Yu Z Y, Cao M H, Zhang S J, Lanagan M T, Liu H X 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1601727Google Scholar

    [13]

    Pan H, Li F, Liu Y, Zhang Q, Wang M, Lan S, Zheng Y, Ma J, Gu L, Shen Y, Yu P, Zhang S, Chen L Q, Lin Y H, Nan C W 2019 Science 365 578Google Scholar

    [14]

    Wang J J, Su Y J, Wang B, Ouyang J, Ren Y, Chen L Q 2020 Nano Energy 72 104665Google Scholar

    [15]

    Li A D, Mak C L, Wong K H, Shao Q Y, Wang Y J, Wu D, Ming N B 2002 J. Cryst. Growth 235 307Google Scholar

    [16]

    Ehara Y, Shimizu T, Yasui S, Oikawa T, Shiraishi T, Tanaka H, Kanenko N, Maran R, Yamada T, Imai Y Sakata O, Valanoor N, Funakubo H 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 104116Google Scholar

    [17]

    Izyumskaya N, Alivov Y I, Cho S J, Morkoç H, Lee H, Kang Y S 2007 Crit. Rev. Solid. State Mater. Sci. 32 111Google Scholar

    [18]

    Choi K J, Biegalski M, Li Y L, Sharan A, Schubert J, Uecker R, Reiche P, Chen Y B, Pan X Q, Gopalan V, Chen L Q, Schlom D G, Eom C B 2004 Science 306 1005Google Scholar

    [19]

    Noguchi Y, Maki H, Kitanaka Y, Matsuo H, Miyayama M 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 113 012903Google Scholar

    [20]

    Li Y L, Chen L Q 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 072905Google Scholar

    [21]

    Pertsev N A, Tagantsev A K, Setter N 2000 Phys. Rev. B 61 R825Google Scholar

    [22]

    Haeni J H, Irvin P, Chang W, Uecker R, Reiche P, Li Y L, Choudhury S, Tian W, Hawley M E, Craigo B, Tagantsev A K, Pan X Q, Streiffer S K, Chen L Q, Kirchoefer S W, Levy J, Schlom D G 2004 Nature 430 758Google Scholar

    [23]

    Zhang J X, Li Y L, Choudhury S, Chen L Q, Chu Y H, Zavaliche F, Cruz M P, Ramesh R, Jia Q X 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 103 094111Google Scholar

    [24]

    Ren W, Yang Y, Diéguez O, Íñiguez J, Choudhury N, Bellaiche L 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 187601Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zhang Y, Xue F, Chen Z H, Liu J M, Chen L Q 2020 Acta Mater. 183 110Google Scholar

    [26]

    Li Y L, Hu S Y, Liu Z K, Chen L Q 2002 Acta Mater. 50 395Google Scholar

    [27]

    Li Y L, Hu S Y, Chen L Q 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 97 034112Google Scholar

    [28]

    Yu Q, Li J, Zhu F, Li J 2014 J. Mater. Chem. C 2 5836Google Scholar

    [29]

    Lu X Y, Chen Z H, Cao Y, Tang Y L, Xu R J, Saremi S, Zhang Z, You L, Dong Y Q, Das S, Zhang H B, Zheng L M, Wu H P, Lv W M, Xie G Q, Liu X J, Li J Y, Chen L, Chen L Q, Cao W W, Martin L W 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 3951Google Scholar

    [30]

    Nguyen M D, Dekkers M, Houwman E, Steenwelle R, Wan X, Roelofs A, Schmitz-Kempen T, Rijnders G 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 252904Google Scholar

    [31]

    Xue F, Wang J J, Sheng G, Huang E, Cao Y, Huang H-H, Munroe P, Mahjoub R, Li Y, Valanoor N, Chen L 2013 Acta Mater. 61 2909Google Scholar

    [32]

    Lin F Y, Cheng X, Chen L Q, Sinnott S B 2018 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 101 4783Google Scholar

    [33]

    Devonshire A F 1949 The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 40 1040Google Scholar

    [34]

    Chen L Q 2008 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91 1835Google Scholar

    [35]

    Chen L Q 2002 Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 32 113Google Scholar

    [36]

    Li Y L, Hu S Y, Liu Z K, Chen L Q 2001 Appl. Phys. Lett. 78 3878Google Scholar

    [37]

    Li Y L, Choudhury S, Liu Z K, Chen L Q 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 1608Google Scholar

    [38]

    Shu W L, Wang J, Zhang T Y 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 112 064108Google Scholar

    [39]

    Wang J J, Wang B, Chen L Q 2019 Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 49 127Google Scholar

    [40]

    Li Y L, Chen L Q, Asayama G, Schlom D G, Zurbuchen M A, Streiffer S K 2004 J. Appl. Phys. 95 6332Google Scholar

    [41]

    Chen L Q, Shen J 1998 Comput. Phys. Commun. 108 147Google Scholar

    [42]

    Haun M J, Zhuang Z Q, Furman E, Jang S J, Cross L E 1989 Ferroelectrics 99 45Google Scholar

    [43]

    Hu H L, Chen L Q 1998 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81 492

    [44]

    Damjanovic D 2005 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 88 2663Google Scholar

    [45]

    Liu W F, Ren X B 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 257602Google Scholar

    [46]

    Li F, Lin D B, Chen Z B, Cheng Z X, Wang J L, Li C C, Xu Z, Huang Q W, Liao X Z, Chen L Q, Shrout T R, Zhang S J 2018 Nat. Mater. 17 349Google Scholar

    [47]

    Liao Z Y, Xue F, Sun W, Song D S, Zhang Q Q, Li J F, Chen L Q, Zhu J 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95 214101Google Scholar

    [48]

    Liu H, Chen J, Huang H B, Fan L L, Ren Y, Pan Z, Deng J X, Chen L Q, Xing X R 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 055501Google Scholar

    [49]

    Ma Z, Ma Y, Chen Z, Zheng F, Gao H, Liu H, Chen H 2018 Ceram. Int. 44 4338Google Scholar

  • 图 1  PZT铁电材料的晶体结构示意图 (a)立方顺电相结构; (b)四方铁电相结构; (c)正交铁电相结构; (d)菱方铁电相结构

    Figure 1.  Schematic of PZT ferroelectric structure: (a) Paraelectric cubic phase; (b) ferroelectric tetragonal phase; (c) ferroelectric orthorhombic phase; (d) ferroelectric rhombohedral phase.

    图 2  (a)−(f)室温下随Ti成分降低(x = 0.8—0.2) PZT的三维自由能曲面, 蓝色代表最小值, 红色代表最大值; (g)−(i) T相、R/T混合相及R相二维自由能双势阱示意图

    Figure 2.  (a)−(f) Free energy surface of PZT with the decrease of Ti composition (x = 0.8–0.2) at room temperature. Blue and red color represents the minimum and maximum value respectively; (g)−(i) Schematic of double well potential of tetragonal phase (g), mixed phase (h) and rhombohedral phase (i).

    图 3  相场模拟PZT薄膜在不同基底失配应变下的畴结构 (a)—(c)分别对应于PZT (x = 0.8)薄膜εsub = 0, εsub = –0.5%, εsub = 0.5%; (d)—(f)分别对应于PZT (x = 0.48)薄膜εsub = 0, εsub = –0. 5%, εsub = 0.5%; (g)—(h)分别对应于PZT (x = 0.2)薄膜εsub = 0, εsub = –0.5%, εsub = 0.5%

    Figure 3.  Domain structures of PZT (x = 0.8, x = 0.48, x = 0.2) thin film with different substrate biaxial misfit strain (εsub = 0, εsub = –0.5%, εsub = 0.5%): (a)−(c) Domain structures of PZT (x = 0.8) thin films at εsub = 0, εsub = –0.5%, εsub = 0.5%; (d)−(f) domain structures of PZT (x = 0.48) thin films at εsub = 0, εsub = –0.5%, εsub = 0.5%; (g)−(h) domain structures of PZT (x = 0.2) thin films at εsub = 0, εsub = –0.5%, εsub = 0.5%.

    图 4  室温下PZT铁电薄膜四方相(x = 0.8), 混合相(x = 0.48)以及菱方相(x = 0.2)在不同的基底失配应变下(εsub = ± 0.1%, ± 0.5%, ± 1.0%)的电滞回线, 其中P *E *表示归一化后的极化强度和电场强度值 (a)−(c)分别表示压应变下四方相、混合相和菱方相的电滞回线; (d)−(f)分别表示拉应变下四方相、混合相和菱方相的电滞回线

    Figure 4.  Hysteresis loops of PZT thin films with three Ti components at different substrate biaxial misfit strains (εsub = ± 0.1%, ± 0.5%, ± 1.0%), and P * and E * are normalized polarization and electric field: (a)−(c) The case of compressive strains; (d)−(f) the case of tensile strains.

    图 5  三种相PZT铁电薄膜的矫顽场、饱和极化和剩余极化值与基底应变的关系 (a) 矫顽场Ec*; (b) 饱和极化值Ps*; (c) 剩余极化值Pr*

    Figure 5.  Normalized coercive field (Ec*), saturation polarization (Pr*), and remnant polarization (Ps*) as a function of substrate misfit strain (εsub), where three PZT ferroelectric thin films with x = 0.8, 0.48 and 0.2 Ti component are considered: (a) Coercive field vs. strain; (b) saturation polarization vs. strain; (c) remnant polarization vs. strain.

    图 6  (a)电滞回线中充放电过程中储能示意图; (b) 三种PZT薄膜材料能量存储效率与基底应变之间的关系

    Figure 6.  (a) Schematic of P-E loop used for energy storage; (b) the energy storage efficiency as a function of substrate misfit strain.

    表 1  三种成分PZT铁电薄膜介电刚度系数和电致伸缩常数

    Table 1.  Corresponding material constants for the Landau free energy, the electrostrictive coefficients of three components PZT thin films.

    CoefficientsPbZr0.2Ti0.8O3PbZr0.52Ti0.48O3PbZr0.8Ti0.2O3
    $ {a}_{1} $/C–2·m2·N3.44 × 105(T – 456.38)1.45 × 105(T – 387.06)2.71 × 105(T – 300.57)
    $ {a}_{11} $/C–4·m6·N–3.05 × 1075.83 × 1073.13 × 108
    $ {a}_{12} $/C–4·m6·N6.32 × 1081.82 × 108–3.45 × 106
    $ {a}_{111} $/C–6·m10·N2.47 × 1081.50 × 1084.29 × 108
    $ {a}_{112} $/C–6·m10·N9.68 × 1086.88 × 1081.81 × 109
    $ {a}_{123} $/C–6·m10·N–4.90 × 109–3.24 × 109–7.54 × 109
    $ {Q}_{11} $/C–2·m40.0810.0940.056
    $ {Q}_{12} $/C–2·m4–0.024–0.044–0.017
    $ {Q}_{44} $/C–2·m40.0320.0400.026
    DownLoad: CSV

    表 2  三种PZT薄膜材料在不同应变下的储能效率值η

    Table 2.  Energy storage efficiency values of the PZT thin films under different strains.

    Strain/%Energy storage efficienc η/%
    PbZr0.2Ti0.8O3PbZr0.52Ti0.48O3PbZr0.8Ti0.2O3
    –1.08.07.811.2
    –0.512.017.418.7
    –0.116.831.023.4
    0.120.040.627.4
    0.530.761.034.7
    1.043.973.655.8
    DownLoad: CSV
  • [1]

    Xu F, Trolier-McKinstry S, Ren W, Xu B, Xie Z L, Hemker K J 2001 J. Appl. Phys. 89 1336Google Scholar

    [2]

    Kim D J, Maria J P, Kingon A I, Streiffer S K 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 93 5568Google Scholar

    [3]

    Karthik J, Martin L 2011 Phys. Rev. B 84 024102Google Scholar

    [4]

    Karthik J, Damodaran A R, Martin L W 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 167601Google Scholar

    [5]

    赵晓英, 刘世建, 褚君浩, 戴宁, 胡古今 2008 物理学报 57 5968Google Scholar

    Zhao X Y, Liu S J, Chu J H, Dai N, Hu G J 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 5968Google Scholar

    [6]

    Arimoto Y, Ishiwara H 2004 MRS Bull. 29 823Google Scholar

    [7]

    Ganapathi K L, Rath M, Rao M S R 2019 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 34 055016Google Scholar

    [8]

    Won S S, Seo H, Kawahara M, Glinsek S, Lee J, Kim Y, Jeong C K, Kingon A I, Kim S H 2019 Nano Energy 55 182Google Scholar

    [9]

    Hoshyarmanesh H, Ebrahimi N, Jafari A, Hoshyarmanesh P, Kim M, Park H H 2019 Sensors 19 13Google Scholar

    [10]

    Gupta R, Gupta V, Tomar M 2020 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 105 104723Google Scholar

    [11]

    Rath M, Varadarajan E, Premkumar S, Shinde S, Natarajan V, Rao M S R 2019 Ferroelectrics 551 17Google Scholar

    [12]

    Yao Z H, Song Z, Hao H, Yu Z Y, Cao M H, Zhang S J, Lanagan M T, Liu H X 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1601727Google Scholar

    [13]

    Pan H, Li F, Liu Y, Zhang Q, Wang M, Lan S, Zheng Y, Ma J, Gu L, Shen Y, Yu P, Zhang S, Chen L Q, Lin Y H, Nan C W 2019 Science 365 578Google Scholar

    [14]

    Wang J J, Su Y J, Wang B, Ouyang J, Ren Y, Chen L Q 2020 Nano Energy 72 104665Google Scholar

    [15]

    Li A D, Mak C L, Wong K H, Shao Q Y, Wang Y J, Wu D, Ming N B 2002 J. Cryst. Growth 235 307Google Scholar

    [16]

    Ehara Y, Shimizu T, Yasui S, Oikawa T, Shiraishi T, Tanaka H, Kanenko N, Maran R, Yamada T, Imai Y Sakata O, Valanoor N, Funakubo H 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 104116Google Scholar

    [17]

    Izyumskaya N, Alivov Y I, Cho S J, Morkoç H, Lee H, Kang Y S 2007 Crit. Rev. Solid. State Mater. Sci. 32 111Google Scholar

    [18]

    Choi K J, Biegalski M, Li Y L, Sharan A, Schubert J, Uecker R, Reiche P, Chen Y B, Pan X Q, Gopalan V, Chen L Q, Schlom D G, Eom C B 2004 Science 306 1005Google Scholar

    [19]

    Noguchi Y, Maki H, Kitanaka Y, Matsuo H, Miyayama M 2018 Appl. Phys. Lett. 113 012903Google Scholar

    [20]

    Li Y L, Chen L Q 2006 Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 072905Google Scholar

    [21]

    Pertsev N A, Tagantsev A K, Setter N 2000 Phys. Rev. B 61 R825Google Scholar

    [22]

    Haeni J H, Irvin P, Chang W, Uecker R, Reiche P, Li Y L, Choudhury S, Tian W, Hawley M E, Craigo B, Tagantsev A K, Pan X Q, Streiffer S K, Chen L Q, Kirchoefer S W, Levy J, Schlom D G 2004 Nature 430 758Google Scholar

    [23]

    Zhang J X, Li Y L, Choudhury S, Chen L Q, Chu Y H, Zavaliche F, Cruz M P, Ramesh R, Jia Q X 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 103 094111Google Scholar

    [24]

    Ren W, Yang Y, Diéguez O, Íñiguez J, Choudhury N, Bellaiche L 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 187601Google Scholar

    [25]

    Zhang Y, Xue F, Chen Z H, Liu J M, Chen L Q 2020 Acta Mater. 183 110Google Scholar

    [26]

    Li Y L, Hu S Y, Liu Z K, Chen L Q 2002 Acta Mater. 50 395Google Scholar

    [27]

    Li Y L, Hu S Y, Chen L Q 2005 J. Appl. Phys. 97 034112Google Scholar

    [28]

    Yu Q, Li J, Zhu F, Li J 2014 J. Mater. Chem. C 2 5836Google Scholar

    [29]

    Lu X Y, Chen Z H, Cao Y, Tang Y L, Xu R J, Saremi S, Zhang Z, You L, Dong Y Q, Das S, Zhang H B, Zheng L M, Wu H P, Lv W M, Xie G Q, Liu X J, Li J Y, Chen L, Chen L Q, Cao W W, Martin L W 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 3951Google Scholar

    [30]

    Nguyen M D, Dekkers M, Houwman E, Steenwelle R, Wan X, Roelofs A, Schmitz-Kempen T, Rijnders G 2011 Appl. Phys. Lett. 99 252904Google Scholar

    [31]

    Xue F, Wang J J, Sheng G, Huang E, Cao Y, Huang H-H, Munroe P, Mahjoub R, Li Y, Valanoor N, Chen L 2013 Acta Mater. 61 2909Google Scholar

    [32]

    Lin F Y, Cheng X, Chen L Q, Sinnott S B 2018 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 101 4783Google Scholar

    [33]

    Devonshire A F 1949 The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 40 1040Google Scholar

    [34]

    Chen L Q 2008 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91 1835Google Scholar

    [35]

    Chen L Q 2002 Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 32 113Google Scholar

    [36]

    Li Y L, Hu S Y, Liu Z K, Chen L Q 2001 Appl. Phys. Lett. 78 3878Google Scholar

    [37]

    Li Y L, Choudhury S, Liu Z K, Chen L Q 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 1608Google Scholar

    [38]

    Shu W L, Wang J, Zhang T Y 2012 J. Appl. Phys. 112 064108Google Scholar

    [39]

    Wang J J, Wang B, Chen L Q 2019 Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 49 127Google Scholar

    [40]

    Li Y L, Chen L Q, Asayama G, Schlom D G, Zurbuchen M A, Streiffer S K 2004 J. Appl. Phys. 95 6332Google Scholar

    [41]

    Chen L Q, Shen J 1998 Comput. Phys. Commun. 108 147Google Scholar

    [42]

    Haun M J, Zhuang Z Q, Furman E, Jang S J, Cross L E 1989 Ferroelectrics 99 45Google Scholar

    [43]

    Hu H L, Chen L Q 1998 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81 492

    [44]

    Damjanovic D 2005 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 88 2663Google Scholar

    [45]

    Liu W F, Ren X B 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 257602Google Scholar

    [46]

    Li F, Lin D B, Chen Z B, Cheng Z X, Wang J L, Li C C, Xu Z, Huang Q W, Liao X Z, Chen L Q, Shrout T R, Zhang S J 2018 Nat. Mater. 17 349Google Scholar

    [47]

    Liao Z Y, Xue F, Sun W, Song D S, Zhang Q Q, Li J F, Chen L Q, Zhu J 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95 214101Google Scholar

    [48]

    Liu H, Chen J, Huang H B, Fan L L, Ren Y, Pan Z, Deng J X, Chen L Q, Xing X R 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 055501Google Scholar

    [49]

    Ma Z, Ma Y, Chen Z, Zheng F, Gao H, Liu H, Chen H 2018 Ceram. Int. 44 4338Google Scholar

  • [1] Tian Guo, Fan Zhen, Chen De-Yang, Hou Zhi-Peng, Liu Jun-Ming, Gao Xing-Sen. Laboratory experiments based on tip probe - Scanning probe detection and regulation of ferroelectric domains and their microscopic physical properties. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(20): 207501. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230954
    [2] Jiang Yan-Bo, Liu Wen-Bo, Sun Zhi-Peng, La Yong-Xiao, Yun Di. Phase-field simulation of void evolution in UO2 under applied stress. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(2): 026103. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211440
    [3] Li Ling, Pan Tian-Ze, Ma Jia-Jun, Zhang Shan-Tao, Wang Yao-Jin. Mechanism of local stress field enhanced pyroelectric performance of PNZST:AlN composite ceramics. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(21): 217701. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221250
    [4] Lin Cui, Bai Gang, Li Wei, Gao Cun-Fa. Strain tuning of negative capacitance in epitaxial PbZr0.2Ti0.8O3 thin films. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(18): 187701. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210810
    [5] Yang Zhao-Xi, Liu Wen-Bo, Zhang Cong-Yu, He Xin-Fu, Sun Zheng-Yang, Jia Li-Xia, Shi Tian-Tian, Yun Di. Phase field simulation of grain boundary segregation and radiation-enhanced segregation in Fe-Cr alloys. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(11): 116101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201840
    [6] Yang Wen-Da, Chen Hong-Ying, Chen Yan, Tian Guo, Gao Xing-Sen. Recent progress in exotic polar topological states in ferroelectric nanostructures. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(21): 217501. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20201063
    [7] Tan Cong-Bing, Zhong Xiang-Li, Wang Jin-Bin. Polar topological structures in ferroelectric materials. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(12): 127702. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200311
    [8] Duan Pei-Pei, Xing Hui, Chen Zhi, Hao Guan-Hua, Wang Bi-Han, Jin Ke-Xin. Phase-field modeling of free dendritic growth of magnesium based alloy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(6): 060201. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.060201
    [9] Du Li-Fei, Zhang Rong, Xing Hui, Zhang Li-Min, Zhang Yang, Liu Lin. Phase-field simulation of solidified microstructure evolution in the presence of lateral constraint. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(10): 106401. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.106401
    [10] Wang Jing, Feng Lu, Hao Yi, Zhao Yang, Chen Zhen-Fei. Strain effect on the morphological instability of a circular island in heteroepitaxy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(23): 238102. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.238102
    [11] Pan Shi-Yan, Zhu Ming-Fang. Quantitative phase-field model for dendritic growth with two-sided diffusion. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(22): 228102. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.228102
    [12] Yu Gang, Dong Xian-Lin, Wang Gen-Shui, Chen Xue-Feng, Cao Fei. Ferroelectric polarization reversal behavior in 63PbTiO3-37BiScO3 bulk ceramics. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(12): 8890-8896. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.8890
    [13] Liang Xiao-Lin, Gong Yue-Qiu, Liu Zhi-Zhuang, Lü Ye-Gang, Zheng Xue-Jun. Effect of external electric field on phase transitions of ferroelectric thin films. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(11): 8167-8171. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.8167
    [14] Zhou Bo, Chen Yun-Lin, Liu Gang, Zhan He. Improvement on the classical model for new domain nucleation in ferroelectrics. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(4): 2762-2767. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.2762
    [15] Wang Gang, Xu Dong-Sheng, Yang Rui. Phase field simulation on sideplates formation in Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(13): 343-S348. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.343
    [16] Chen Xue-Feng, Li Hua-Mei, Li Dong-Jie, Cao Fei, Dong Xian-Lin. Study on slim-loop ferroelectric ceramics for high-power pulse capacitors. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(11): 7298-7304. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.7298
    [17] Wang Ying-Long, Wei Tong-Ru, Liu Bao-Ting, Deng Ze_Chao. Effect of thickness of epitaxial PbZr0.4Ti0.6O3 film on the physical properties. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(5): 2931-2936. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.2931
    [18] Zeng Hua-Rong, Yu Han-Feng, Chu Rui-Qing, Li Guo-Rong, Yin Qing-Rui, Tang Xin-Gui. Field-induced displacement properties of nanoscale domain structure in PZT thin film. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(3): 1437-1441. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.1437
    [19] Li Bao-Shan, Zhu Zhi-Gang, Li Guo-Rong, Yin Qing-Rui, Ding Ai-Li. Frequency and temperature dependence of the hysteresis loop in PMnN-PZT ceramics. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(2): 939-943. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.939
    [20] Wang Long-Hai, Yu Jun, Wang Yun-Bo, Peng Gang, Liu Feng, Gao Jun-Xiong. A model of ferroelectric capacitors based on hysteresis loop. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(2): 949-954. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.949
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  9200
  • PDF Downloads:  432
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  28 February 2020
  • Accepted Date:  29 March 2020
  • Published Online:  20 June 2020

/

返回文章
返回