-
Despite the fact that three-dimensional organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite is regarded as a promising material in the field of optoelectronics and microelectronics due to its excellent photoelectric properties, however, the instability under the moisture environment and the gate-voltage screening effect associated with ionic transport are still serious, which restricts the development of perovskite devices. Here in this work, the lead iodide perovskite (PEA)2(MA)n–1PbnI3n+1 series are successfully prepared by one-step solution method, including pure-two-dimensional (pure-2D), quasi-two-dimensional (quasi-2D) and traditional three-dimensional (3D) perovskite materials. The dimension and microstructure of the perovskites are regulated, and the effects of dimensions on the performance of organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite materials are investigated firstly. The crystallization of the 2D perovskites and 3D perovskite films are observed obviously. Moreover, the surface of pure-2D perovskite film with discoid, regular and micron-sized grains is smoother than that of 3D perovskite film. And also, the unapparent grain boundary is exhibited in the quasi-2D perovskites. A uniform perovskite film with full coverage and inconspicuous grain boundaries facilitates the transmission capacity of the charge carriers in the channel layer due to the reduction of defects caused by the grain boundaries. And benefited from the high-quality films with inconspicuous grain boundary as demonstrated, the quasi-2D hybrid perovskite film exhibits a longer carrier lifetime (τns) than traditional 3D MAPbI3 perovskite film, revealing that the layered 2D structure is more favorable for carrier transport due to the fewer defects in it. In addition, under the condition of the same environment humidity, the 2D perovskite materials show better moisture stability. Then, to investigate the influences of dimensional structure on the perovskite field-effect devices, we fabricate the bottom-gate and top-contact thin film transistors (TFTs) based on the perovskite materials with different dimensions. As a result, the instability and ion migration effect for each of the devices are suppressed effectively due to the distinct 2D layer-structure and quantum confinement effect, which leads the device performance to be further improved. The device based on quasi-2D (n = 6) channel TFT achieves a hole mobility (μhole) of 3.9 cm2/(V·s), an on-off current ratio of 104 and more, and a 1.85V turn-on voltage of 1.85 V. The first application of quasi-2D organic and inorganic hybrid perovskite materials to thin film transistors provides a new idea for preparing the high-performance and stable thin film transistor devices.
-
Keywords:
- two-dimensional perovskite /
- environmental stability /
- thin film transistors /
- hole mobility
[1] Kojima A, Teshima K, Shirai Y, Miyasaka T 2009 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 6050
Google Scholar
[2] Lee M M, Teuscher J, Miyasaka T, Murakami T N, Snaith H J 2012 Science 338 643
Google Scholar
[3] Im J H, Jang I H, Pellet N, Grätzel M, Park N G 2014 Nat. Nanotechnol. 9 927
Google Scholar
[4] Mei Y, Zhang C, Vardeny Z V, Jurchescu O D 2015 MRS Commun. 5 297
Google Scholar
[5] Park C B, Kim K M, Lee J E, Na H I, Yoo S S, Yang M S 2014 Org. Electron. 15 3538
Google Scholar
[6] Takeya J, Yamagishi M, Tominari Y, Nakazawa Y 2007 Solid-State Electron. 51 1338
Google Scholar
[7] Robert F 2000 Science 287 415
Google Scholar
[8] Chiarella F, Ferro P, Licci F, et al. 2007 Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. A86 89
Google Scholar
[9] Feng L, Chun M, Hong W, Wei J H, Wei L Y, Arif D S, Tom W 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 8238
Google Scholar
[10] Yusoff A R B M, Kim H P, Li X, Kim J, Jang J, Nazeeruddin M K 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1602940
Google Scholar
[11] Lin Y, Bai Y, Fang Y, Wang Q, Deng Y, Huang J 2017 ACS Energy Lett. 2 1571
Google Scholar
[12] Chin X Y, Cortecchia D, Yin J, Bruno A, Soci C 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7383
Google Scholar
[13] Labram J G, Fabini D H, Perry E E, et al. 2015 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6 3565
Google Scholar
[14] Smith I C, Hoke E T, Solis‐Ibarra D, McGehee M D, Karunadasa H I 2014 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53 11232
Google Scholar
[15] Cao D H, Stoumpos C C, Farha O K, Hupp J T, Kanatzidis M G 2015 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 7843
Google Scholar
[16] Saparov B, Mitzi D B 2016 Chem. Rev. 116 4558
Google Scholar
[17] Yang S, Niu W, Wang A L, Fan Z, Chen B, Tan C, Lu Q, Zhang H 2017 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56 4252
Google Scholar
[18] Wang Y, Liu X, Li L, Ji C, Sun Z, Han S, Tao K, Luo J 2019 Chem. Asian J. 14 1530
Google Scholar
[19] Kagan C R, Mitzi D B, Dimitrakopoulos C D 1999 Science 286 945
Google Scholar
[20] Matsushima T, Mathevet F, Heinrich B, et al. 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 109 253301
Google Scholar
[21] Zhu H, Liu A, Luque H L, Sun H, Ji D, Noh Y Y 2019 Acs Nano. 13 3971
Google Scholar
[22] Ahmad S, Fu P, Yu S, Yang Q, Liu X, Wang X, Wang X, Guo X, Li C 2019 Joule 3 794
Google Scholar
[23] 陈皓然, 夏英东, 陈永华, 黄维 2018 材料导报 32 1
Google Scholar
Chen H R, Xia Y D, Chen Y H, Huang W 2018 Materials Reports 32 1
Google Scholar
[24] 张琦忠 2018 硕士学位论文 (合肥: 中国科学技术大学)
Zhang Q 2018 M. S. Thesis (Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China) (in Chinese)
[25] Tsai H, Nie W, Blancon J C, et al. 2016 Nature 536 312
Google Scholar
[26] Cheng Z, Lin J 2010 Crystengcomm 12 2646
Google Scholar
[27] Zhang F, Lu H, Tong J, Berry J J, Beard M C, Zhu K 2020 Energy Environ. Sci. 13 1154
Google Scholar
[28] Zheng H, Liu G, Zhu L, Ye J, Zhang X, Alsaedi A, Hayat T, Pan X, Dai S 2018 Adv. Energy Mater. 8 1800051.1
[29] Peng Y, Tang L, Zhou Z, Xu J, Li J, Cai H, Ni J, Zhang J 2018 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51 445101
Google Scholar
[30] Soe C M M, Nagabhushana G P, Shivaramaiah R, et al. 2018 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116 58
-
图 1 (a) 不同维度钙钛矿成膜工艺示意图; (b) 底栅顶接触钙钛矿TFTs器件结构示意图
Figure 1. (a) Synthesis of perovskite film with different dimensions; (b) schematic structure of TFT based on perovskite with a typical structure of bottom-gate, top-contact TFT.
图 2 不同维度钙钛矿结构示意图
Figure 2. Schematic of perovskite structures with different dimensions
图 3 不同维度钙钛矿薄膜扫描电子显微镜图 (a)纯二维; (b) n = 3的准二维; (c) n = 6的准二维; (d) 三维钙钛矿. 扫描电子显微镜图比例尺为1 μm
Figure 3. SEM images of perovskite films with different dimensions (a) Pure-2D; (b) Quasi-2D (n = 3); (c) Quasi-2D (n = 6); (d) 3D. The scale bar is 1 μm for the SEM images.
图 4 不同维度钙钛矿薄膜表面原子力显微镜图 (a) 纯二维; (b) n = 3的准二维; (c) n = 6的准二维; (d) 三维钙钛矿. 原子力显微镜图比例尺为5μm
Figure 4. Top-surface AFM images of perovskite films with different dimensions: (a) Pure-2D; (b) quasi-2D (n = 3); (c) quasi-2D (n = 6); (d) 3D. The scale bar is 5 μm for the AFM images.
图 5 不同维度钙钛矿薄膜的XRD图谱
Figure 5. XRD patterns of perovskite films with different dimensions.
图 6 不同维度钙钛矿薄膜 (a) 归一化稳态光致发光光谱; (b) 时间分辨光致发光光谱
Figure 6. (a) Normalized PL (b) time-resolved PL spectra of perovskite films with different dimensions.
图 7 不同维度钙钛矿薄膜的水接触角 (a) 纯二维; (b) n = 3的准二维; (c) n = 6的准二维; (d) 三维钙钛矿; (e) 不同维度钙钛矿在30%湿度的空气环境下暴露前后对比图
Figure 7. Water contact angle of perovskite films with different dimensions: (a) Pure-2D; (b) Quasi-2D (n = 3); (c) Quasi-2D (n = 6); (d) 3D; (e) images of perovskite films with different dimensions before and after exposed to 30% humidity of the ambient environment.
图 8 基于不同维度钙钛矿的薄膜晶体管器件转移特性曲线 (a)Ids-Vg; (b)
$ I_{\rm ds}^{1/2} $ -Vg 对比图Figure 8. A comparison of typical transfer characteristic curve of the TFT devices based on the perovskite with different dimensions: (a) Ids-Vg; (b)
$ I_{\rm ds}^{1/2} $ -Vg, respectively.
图 9 (a) n = 20的准二维; (b) n = 30的准二维钙钛矿扫描电子显微镜图; (c) n = 20的准二维; (d) n = 30 的准二维钙钛矿原子力显微镜图. 扫描电子显微镜比例尺为500 nm; 原子力显微镜比例尺为5 μm
Figure 9. SEM images of perovskite films (a) Quasi-2D (n=20); b) Quasi-2D (n=30). The scale bar is 500 nm for the SEM images and 5 μm for the AFM images.
表 1 不同维度钙钛矿TRPL衰减曲线拟合的时间常数和振幅
Table 1. Time constant and amplitude of perovskites with different dimensions by fitting the TRPL decay curves.
PEA2MAn-1PbnI3 n+1 A1 τ1/ns A2 τ2/ns τave/ns n = 1 — — — — — n = 3 572.0 18.3 66.9 125.2 101.9 n = 6 520.9 31.2 306.2 236.6 198.9 n = ∞ 347.6 6.2 77.16 44.3 29.5 
DownLoad: CSV
表 2 不同维度钙钛矿薄膜的水接触角
Table 2. Summary of water contact angle of perovskite films with different dimensions
Pure-2D Quasi-2D (n = 3) Quasi-2D (n = 6) 3D Water contact angle/(°) 75.31 64.70 61.66 38.88
DownLoad: CSV
表 3 基于不同维度钙钛矿的薄膜晶体管器件的相关性能参数
Table 3. Summary of related performance parameters of TFT devices based on the perovskite with different dimensions.
Perovskite
styleμhole/cm2·(V·s)–1 Ion/Ioff Vth/V SS/V·dec–1 Pure-2D 7.2×10–2 105 2.30 0.11 Quasi-2D
(n = 3)2.90 105 3.10 0.60 Quasi-2D
(n = 6)3.90 105 1.85 1.10 Quasi-2D
(n = 20)0.79 105 0.44 1.25 Quasi-2D
(n = 30)0.27 105 0.70 1.60 3D 0.30 104 0.60 0.14
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] Kojima A, Teshima K, Shirai Y, Miyasaka T 2009 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 6050
Google Scholar
[2] Lee M M, Teuscher J, Miyasaka T, Murakami T N, Snaith H J 2012 Science 338 643
Google Scholar
[3] Im J H, Jang I H, Pellet N, Grätzel M, Park N G 2014 Nat. Nanotechnol. 9 927
Google Scholar
[4] Mei Y, Zhang C, Vardeny Z V, Jurchescu O D 2015 MRS Commun. 5 297
Google Scholar
[5] Park C B, Kim K M, Lee J E, Na H I, Yoo S S, Yang M S 2014 Org. Electron. 15 3538
Google Scholar
[6] Takeya J, Yamagishi M, Tominari Y, Nakazawa Y 2007 Solid-State Electron. 51 1338
Google Scholar
[7] Robert F 2000 Science 287 415
Google Scholar
[8] Chiarella F, Ferro P, Licci F, et al. 2007 Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. A86 89
Google Scholar
[9] Feng L, Chun M, Hong W, Wei J H, Wei L Y, Arif D S, Tom W 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 8238
Google Scholar
[10] Yusoff A R B M, Kim H P, Li X, Kim J, Jang J, Nazeeruddin M K 2017 Adv. Mater. 29 1602940
Google Scholar
[11] Lin Y, Bai Y, Fang Y, Wang Q, Deng Y, Huang J 2017 ACS Energy Lett. 2 1571
Google Scholar
[12] Chin X Y, Cortecchia D, Yin J, Bruno A, Soci C 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7383
Google Scholar
[13] Labram J G, Fabini D H, Perry E E, et al. 2015 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6 3565
Google Scholar
[14] Smith I C, Hoke E T, Solis‐Ibarra D, McGehee M D, Karunadasa H I 2014 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53 11232
Google Scholar
[15] Cao D H, Stoumpos C C, Farha O K, Hupp J T, Kanatzidis M G 2015 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 7843
Google Scholar
[16] Saparov B, Mitzi D B 2016 Chem. Rev. 116 4558
Google Scholar
[17] Yang S, Niu W, Wang A L, Fan Z, Chen B, Tan C, Lu Q, Zhang H 2017 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56 4252
Google Scholar
[18] Wang Y, Liu X, Li L, Ji C, Sun Z, Han S, Tao K, Luo J 2019 Chem. Asian J. 14 1530
Google Scholar
[19] Kagan C R, Mitzi D B, Dimitrakopoulos C D 1999 Science 286 945
Google Scholar
[20] Matsushima T, Mathevet F, Heinrich B, et al. 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 109 253301
Google Scholar
[21] Zhu H, Liu A, Luque H L, Sun H, Ji D, Noh Y Y 2019 Acs Nano. 13 3971
Google Scholar
[22] Ahmad S, Fu P, Yu S, Yang Q, Liu X, Wang X, Wang X, Guo X, Li C 2019 Joule 3 794
Google Scholar
[23] 陈皓然, 夏英东, 陈永华, 黄维 2018 材料导报 32 1
Google Scholar
Chen H R, Xia Y D, Chen Y H, Huang W 2018 Materials Reports 32 1
Google Scholar
[24] 张琦忠 2018 硕士学位论文 (合肥: 中国科学技术大学)
Zhang Q 2018 M. S. Thesis (Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China) (in Chinese)
[25] Tsai H, Nie W, Blancon J C, et al. 2016 Nature 536 312
Google Scholar
[26] Cheng Z, Lin J 2010 Crystengcomm 12 2646
Google Scholar
[27] Zhang F, Lu H, Tong J, Berry J J, Beard M C, Zhu K 2020 Energy Environ. Sci. 13 1154
Google Scholar
[28] Zheng H, Liu G, Zhu L, Ye J, Zhang X, Alsaedi A, Hayat T, Pan X, Dai S 2018 Adv. Energy Mater. 8 1800051.1
[29] Peng Y, Tang L, Zhou Z, Xu J, Li J, Cai H, Ni J, Zhang J 2018 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51 445101
Google Scholar
[30] Soe C M M, Nagabhushana G P, Shivaramaiah R, et al. 2018 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116 58
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 9316
- PDF Downloads: 216
- Cited By: 0
