Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Dynamics of multipartite quantum coherence in asymmetric spin-orbit coupled system

Shao Ya-Ting Yan Kai Wu Yin-Zhong Hao Xiang

Citation:

Dynamics of multipartite quantum coherence in asymmetric spin-orbit coupled system

Shao Ya-Ting, Yan Kai, Wu Yin-Zhong, Hao Xiang
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • The time evolution of multipartite quantum coherence is studied in a three-body spin system with an asymmetric interaction. The l1 norm measurement is used to estimate the degree of quantum coherence in the spin system. The decoherence of all components of quantum coherence in the three-body spin system is analyzed by the exact diagnolization and numerical method based on quantum master equation. The environmental noise induced by the spontaneous decay can be simulated by the quantum amplitude damping model. It is found that the time evolution of quantum coherence component is closely related to the quantum property of the whole initial state. When the initial state is a separable pure one, the asymmetric interactions can conduce to the enhancement of the degree of multipartite quantum coherence in a short time interval. Under the influence of quantum noise, the degree of quantum coherence decreases gradually. We pay much attention to the spatial distribution of the degree of quantum coherence in a many-body system. The additivity relationship of bipartite component and tripartite coherence can exist if the initial state is chosen to be a Werner-like state. This kind of the coherence additivity between all bipartite components and global coherence can be extended to an arbitrary N-body Werner-like state. But this additivity relationship depends on the l1 norm coherence measurement. Owing to the asymmetric interaction and noise, the degree of tripartite quantum coherence is more than the sum of all degrees of bipartite quantum coherence. The difference between the degree of tripartite coherence and the sum of all degrees of bipartite coherence is increased in a short time interval. The environmental noise can also suppress the difference in the coherence degree. The degree of the nearest neighboring bipartite coherence decreases more quickly than those of other bipartite coherences. The asymmetric interaction gives rise to the improvement in the degree of bipartite coherence and tripartite coherence. The coherence of the next-nearest neighboring two systems can be robust against the environmental noise. These results are helpful in preparing the multipartite quantum resources. We can utilize the system of coupled micro-cavities to realize the quantum spin system with controllable asymmetric interaction. In this way, the global coherence and bipartite coherence can be manipulated effectively by the quantum electromagnetic technology.
      Corresponding author: Hao Xiang, xhao@mail.usts.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61875145) and the Foundation for Key Disciplines of the Thirteenth Five-Year Plan of Jiangsu Province, China (Grant No. 20168765)
    [1]

    吕为民 2019 博士学位论文 (北京: 中国科学技术大学)

    Lv W M 2019 Ph. D. Dissertation (Beijing: University of Science and Technology of China) (in Chinese)

    [2]

    Barney R D, Huele J F S V 2019 Phys. Scr. 94 105105Google Scholar

    [3]

    Ding Z Y, Yang H, Yuan H, Wang D, Yang J, Ye L 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 022308Google Scholar

    [4]

    Kouzakov K A, Chotorlishvili L, Wtzel J, Berakdar J, Ernst A 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 022311Google Scholar

    [5]

    Guo W J, Wei L F 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 010303Google Scholar

    [6]

    Liu Z, Qiu L, Pan F 2017 Quantum Inf. Process. 16 109Google Scholar

    [7]

    Khmelinskii I, Makarov V I 2020 Chem. Phys. 532 110671Google Scholar

    [8]

    Afsaneh E, Bagheri H M, Jafari M 2018 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 51 145502Google Scholar

    [9]

    高明 2011 博士学位论文 (湖南: 国防科学技术大学)

    Gao M 2011 Ph. D. Dissertation (Hunan: National University of Defense Technology) (in Chinese)

    [10]

    Chuchem M, Cohen D 2010 Physica E 42 555Google Scholar

    [11]

    Trushechkin A S 2019 Math Notes 106 986Google Scholar

    [12]

    Rodriguez-Rosario C A, Frauenheim T, Aspuru-Guzik A 2019 Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 26 1950022Google Scholar

    [13]

    Balazadenh L, Najarbashi G, Tavana A 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 17789Google Scholar

    [14]

    Escalera-Moreno L, Gaita-Ariño A, Coronado E 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 064405Google Scholar

    [15]

    Lin C W, Sels D, Wang Y B 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 022320Google Scholar

    [16]

    Baumgratz T, Cramer M, Plenio M B 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 140401Google Scholar

    [17]

    Zhao M J, Ma T, Quan Q, Fan H, Pereira R 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 012315Google Scholar

    [18]

    Hu M L, Fan H 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 022312Google Scholar

    [19]

    Gao D M, Lv T H 2019 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 58 1195Google Scholar

    [20]

    Sargolzahi I, Mirafzali S Y 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 042121Google Scholar

    [21]

    张志君 2017 硕士学位论文 (南京: 南京邮电大学)

    Zhang Z J 2017 M. S. Thesis (Nanjing: Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications) (in Chinese)

    [22]

    范洪义 2014 物理学报 63 020302Google Scholar

    Fan H Y 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 020302Google Scholar

    [23]

    田聪, 鹿翔, 张英杰, 夏云杰 2019 物理学报 68 150301Google Scholar

    Tian C, Lu X, Zhang Y J, Xia Y J 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 150301Google Scholar

    [24]

    Yuan Z G, Zhang P, Li S S, Jian J 2016 Ann. Phys. 365 223Google Scholar

    [25]

    Karpat G, Cakmak B, Fanchini F F 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90 104431Google Scholar

    [26]

    Malvezzi A L, Karpat G, Cakmak B, Fanchini F F, Debarba T, Vianna R O 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93 184428Google Scholar

    [27]

    Korenic A, Perovic S, Cirkovic M M, Miquel P A 2020 Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 150 1Google Scholar

    [28]

    Xu P, Hu Y H, Hou X W 2018 Physica A 491 282Google Scholar

    [29]

    Peng H P, Fang M F, Yu M, Zou H M 2018 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57 1872Google Scholar

    [30]

    Ming F, Wang D, Shi W N, Huang A J, Du M M, Sun W Y, Ye L 2018 Quantum Inf. Process. 17 267Google Scholar

    [31]

    Xie Y X, Gao Y Y 2019 Laser Phys. Lett. 16 045202Google Scholar

    [32]

    Radhakrishnan C, Ermakov I, Byrnes T 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 012341Google Scholar

    [33]

    Hui N J, Xu Y Y, Wang J, Zhang Y, Hu Z D 2017 Physica B 510 7Google Scholar

    [34]

    Feldman K E 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 1039Google Scholar

    [35]

    Levitov L S, Rashba E I 2001 Phys. Rev. B 67 115324

    [36]

    Dzyaloshinskii I 1958 Phys. Chem. Solids 4 241Google Scholar

    [37]

    Moriya T 1960 Phys. Rev. 120 91Google Scholar

    [38]

    De Raedt H, Miyashita S, Michielsen K and Machida M 2004 Phys. Rev. B 70 064401Google Scholar

    [39]

    Hartmann M J, Brand O F G S L, Plenio M B 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 160501Google Scholar

    [40]

    Chen Z X, Zhou Z W, Zhou X, Zhou X F, Guo G C 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 022303Google Scholar

    [41]

    Yu T, Eberly J H 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 140404Google Scholar

  • 图 1  当初态为$ \left| {001} \right\rangle $时, 量子相干组分演化, 参量选取为$ D = 0.2, $ $ \gamma = 0.2, $ $ \varGamma = 0.5, $ $ n = 0.2$, 黑色实线为$ {C_{123}}$, 红色虚线和绿色点划线分别为$ {C_{12}}, {C_{13}}$, 蓝色点线为$ {C_{23}}$

    Figure 1.  The dynamics of all fractions of quantum coherence for the initial state $ \left| {001} \right\rangle $. The parameters are chosen to be$ D = 0.2, $ $ \gamma = 0.2, $ $ \varGamma = 0.5, $ $ n = 0.2$. The black solid line denotes $ {C_{123}}$, the red dashed and green dot-dashed line are $ {C_{12}}, {C_{13}}$ respectively, and the blue dotted line represents $ {C_{23}}$.

    图 2  当初态为$ \left| {001} \right\rangle $时, 量子相干组分差值的演化, 参量选取为$ \varGamma = 0.5, $ $ n = 0.2$ (a) 当$ \gamma = 0.2$时, 黑色实线对应参数$ D = 0.3, $ 红色虚线对应$ D = 0.5;$ (b)当$ D = 0.2$时, 黑色实线对应参数$ \gamma = 0.3, $ 红色虚线对应$ \gamma = 0.7$

    Figure 2.  The dynamics of the difference of quantum coherence for the initial state $ \left| {001} \right\rangle $. The parameters are chosen to be $ \varGamma = 0.5, $ $ n = 0.2$: (a) When $ \gamma = 0.2$, the black solid line denotes $ D = 0.3$ the red dashed line is $ D = 0.5;$ (b) When $ D = 0.2$, the black solid line denotes$ \gamma = 0.3, $ the red dashed line is $ \gamma = 0.7$.

    图 3  当初态为W态时, 量子相干组分演化, 参量$ D = 0.2, $ $ \gamma = 0.2, $ $ \varGamma = 0.5, $ $ n = 0.2$,  黑色实线为$ {C_{123}}$, 红色虚线和绿色点划线分别为$ {C_{12}}, {C_{13}}$, 蓝色点线为$ {C_{23}}$

    Figure 3.  The dynamics of all fractions of quantum coherence for the initial W state. The parameters are chosen to be $ D = 0.2, $ $ \gamma = 0.2, $ $ \varGamma = 0.5, $ $ n = 0.2$. The black solid line denotes $ {C_{123}}$, the red dashed and green dot-dashed line are $ {C_{12}}, {C_{13}}$ respectively, and the blue dotted line represents $ {C_{23}}$.

    图 4  当初态为W态时, 量子相干组分差值的演化, 参量选取为$ \varGamma = 0.5, $ $ n = 0.2$ (a) 当$ \gamma = 0.2$时, 黑色实线对应参数$ D = 0.3, $ 红色虚线对应$ D = 0.5;$ (b)当$ D = 0.2$时, 黑色实线对应参数$ \gamma = 0.3, $ 红色虚线对应$ \gamma = 0.7$

    Figure 4.  The dynamics of the difference of quantum coherence for the initial W state. The parameters are chosen to be $ \varGamma = 0.5, $ $ n = 0.2$; (a) When $ \gamma = 0.2$, the black solid line denotes $ D = 0.3$ the red dashed line is $ D = 0.5;$ (b) When $ D = 0.2$, the black solid line denotes$ \gamma = 0.3, $ the red dashed line is $ \gamma = 0.7$.

  • [1]

    吕为民 2019 博士学位论文 (北京: 中国科学技术大学)

    Lv W M 2019 Ph. D. Dissertation (Beijing: University of Science and Technology of China) (in Chinese)

    [2]

    Barney R D, Huele J F S V 2019 Phys. Scr. 94 105105Google Scholar

    [3]

    Ding Z Y, Yang H, Yuan H, Wang D, Yang J, Ye L 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 022308Google Scholar

    [4]

    Kouzakov K A, Chotorlishvili L, Wtzel J, Berakdar J, Ernst A 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 022311Google Scholar

    [5]

    Guo W J, Wei L F 2017 Chin. Phys. B 26 010303Google Scholar

    [6]

    Liu Z, Qiu L, Pan F 2017 Quantum Inf. Process. 16 109Google Scholar

    [7]

    Khmelinskii I, Makarov V I 2020 Chem. Phys. 532 110671Google Scholar

    [8]

    Afsaneh E, Bagheri H M, Jafari M 2018 J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 51 145502Google Scholar

    [9]

    高明 2011 博士学位论文 (湖南: 国防科学技术大学)

    Gao M 2011 Ph. D. Dissertation (Hunan: National University of Defense Technology) (in Chinese)

    [10]

    Chuchem M, Cohen D 2010 Physica E 42 555Google Scholar

    [11]

    Trushechkin A S 2019 Math Notes 106 986Google Scholar

    [12]

    Rodriguez-Rosario C A, Frauenheim T, Aspuru-Guzik A 2019 Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 26 1950022Google Scholar

    [13]

    Balazadenh L, Najarbashi G, Tavana A 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 17789Google Scholar

    [14]

    Escalera-Moreno L, Gaita-Ariño A, Coronado E 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 064405Google Scholar

    [15]

    Lin C W, Sels D, Wang Y B 2020 Phys. Rev. A 101 022320Google Scholar

    [16]

    Baumgratz T, Cramer M, Plenio M B 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 140401Google Scholar

    [17]

    Zhao M J, Ma T, Quan Q, Fan H, Pereira R 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 012315Google Scholar

    [18]

    Hu M L, Fan H 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 022312Google Scholar

    [19]

    Gao D M, Lv T H 2019 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 58 1195Google Scholar

    [20]

    Sargolzahi I, Mirafzali S Y 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 042121Google Scholar

    [21]

    张志君 2017 硕士学位论文 (南京: 南京邮电大学)

    Zhang Z J 2017 M. S. Thesis (Nanjing: Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications) (in Chinese)

    [22]

    范洪义 2014 物理学报 63 020302Google Scholar

    Fan H Y 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 020302Google Scholar

    [23]

    田聪, 鹿翔, 张英杰, 夏云杰 2019 物理学报 68 150301Google Scholar

    Tian C, Lu X, Zhang Y J, Xia Y J 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 150301Google Scholar

    [24]

    Yuan Z G, Zhang P, Li S S, Jian J 2016 Ann. Phys. 365 223Google Scholar

    [25]

    Karpat G, Cakmak B, Fanchini F F 2014 Phys. Rev. B 90 104431Google Scholar

    [26]

    Malvezzi A L, Karpat G, Cakmak B, Fanchini F F, Debarba T, Vianna R O 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93 184428Google Scholar

    [27]

    Korenic A, Perovic S, Cirkovic M M, Miquel P A 2020 Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 150 1Google Scholar

    [28]

    Xu P, Hu Y H, Hou X W 2018 Physica A 491 282Google Scholar

    [29]

    Peng H P, Fang M F, Yu M, Zou H M 2018 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57 1872Google Scholar

    [30]

    Ming F, Wang D, Shi W N, Huang A J, Du M M, Sun W Y, Ye L 2018 Quantum Inf. Process. 17 267Google Scholar

    [31]

    Xie Y X, Gao Y Y 2019 Laser Phys. Lett. 16 045202Google Scholar

    [32]

    Radhakrishnan C, Ermakov I, Byrnes T 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 012341Google Scholar

    [33]

    Hui N J, Xu Y Y, Wang J, Zhang Y, Hu Z D 2017 Physica B 510 7Google Scholar

    [34]

    Feldman K E 2006 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39 1039Google Scholar

    [35]

    Levitov L S, Rashba E I 2001 Phys. Rev. B 67 115324

    [36]

    Dzyaloshinskii I 1958 Phys. Chem. Solids 4 241Google Scholar

    [37]

    Moriya T 1960 Phys. Rev. 120 91Google Scholar

    [38]

    De Raedt H, Miyashita S, Michielsen K and Machida M 2004 Phys. Rev. B 70 064401Google Scholar

    [39]

    Hartmann M J, Brand O F G S L, Plenio M B 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 160501Google Scholar

    [40]

    Chen Z X, Zhou Z W, Zhou X, Zhou X F, Guo G C 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 022303Google Scholar

    [41]

    Yu T, Eberly J H 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 140404Google Scholar

  • [1] Zhang Jiao-Yang, Cong Shuang, Wang Chi, Sajede Harraz. Decoherence suppression for N-qubit states via weak measurement and environment-assisted measurement. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(22): 220303. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220760
    [2] Hu Qiang, Zeng Bai-Yun, Gu Peng-Yu, Jia Xin-Yan, Fan Dai-He. Testing quantum nonlocality of two-qubit entangled states under decoherence. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(7): 070301. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211453
    [3] Wang Zhi-Mei, Wang Hong, Xue Nai-Tao, Cheng Gao-Yan. Quantum coherence in spin-orbit coupled quantum dots system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(7): 078502. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212111
    [4] Bai Xu-Fang, Chen Lei. Magnetopolaron-state lifetime and qubit decoherence in donor-center quantum dots with the electromagnetic field. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(14): 147802. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200242
    [5] Lan Kang, Du Qian, Kang Li-Sha, Jiang Lu-Jing, Lin Zhen-Yu, Zhang Yan-Hui. The electron transfer properties of an open double quantum dot based on a quantum point contact. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(4): 040504. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191718
    [6] Li Hai, Zou Jian, Shao Bin, Chen Yu, Hua Zhen. Study on energy extraction assisted with quantum correlated coherence in bath. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(4): 040201. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181525
    [7] Li Bao-Min, Hu Ming-Liang, Fan Heng. Quantum coherence. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(3): 030304. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181779
    [8] Yan Jie, Wei Miao-Miao, Xing Yan-Xia. Dephasing effect of quantum spin topological states in HgTe/CdTe quantum well. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(22): 227301. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191072
    [9] Cong Mei-Yan, Yang Jing, Huang Yan-Xia. Effects of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interacton and decoherence on entanglement dynamics in Heisenberg spin chain system with different initial states. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(17): 170301. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.170301
    [10] Zhao Hu, Li Tie-Fu, Liu Qi-Chun, Zhang Ying-Shan, Liu Jian-She, Chen Wei. Decoherence characterization of three-dimensional transmon. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(22): 220305. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.220305
    [11] Luo Zhi-Hua. Non-classical energy state and quantum tunnling coherence dissipation for the two-state system with the spin coupled to the lattice phonon. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(20): 207201. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.207201
    [12] Zhao Wen-Lei, Wang Jian-Zhong, Dou Fu-Quan. Decoherence by a classically small influence. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(24): 240302. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.240302
    [13] Chen Ai-Xi, Chen Yuan, Deng Li, Kuang Yun-Feng. Spontaneously generated coherence induced transparency in an asymmetric semiconductor quantum well. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(21): 214204. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.214204
    [14] Ye Bin, Xu Wen-Bo, Gu Bin-Jie. Robust quantum computation of the quantum kicked Harper model and dissipative decoherence. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(2): 689-695. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.689
    [15] Fang Yuan-Feng, Du Chun-Guang, Li Shi-Qun. Quntum interference of four-level atomic system embedded in photonic band gap structure. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(9): 4652-4658. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.4652
    [16] Tan Xia, Zhang Cheng-Qiang, Xia Yun-Jie. Entanglement and intrinsic decoherence in the interaction between two-mode field and atom. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(5): 2263-2268. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.2263
    [17] Wang Cheng-Zhi, Fang Miao-Fa. . Acta Physica Sinica, 2002, 51(9): 1989-1995. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.1989
    [18] Hao San-Ru, Wang Lu-Ya. . Acta Physica Sinica, 2000, 49(4): 610-614. doi: 10.7498/aps.49.610
    [19] YI LIN, YAO KAI-LUN. QUANTUM TRANSPORT EQUATION FOR SPIN GLASS SYSTEMS. Acta Physica Sinica, 1994, 43(6): 1024-1028. doi: 10.7498/aps.43.1024
    [20] CHEN HONG, ZHANG YU-MEI, WU XIANG. LOCALIZATION-DISLOCALIZATION TRANSITION IN DISSIP-ATIVE QUANTUM TUNNELING SYSTEMS. Acta Physica Sinica, 1989, 38(9): 1497-1500. doi: 10.7498/aps.38.1497
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  3928
  • PDF Downloads:  69
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  26 July 2020
  • Accepted Date:  24 August 2020
  • Available Online:  22 October 2020
  • Published Online:  05 January 2021

/

返回文章
返回