Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

NO2 gas detection based on standard sample regression algorithm and cavity enhanced spectroscopy

Bian Xiao-Ge Zhou Sheng Zhang Lei He Tian-Bo Li Jin-Song

Citation:

NO2 gas detection based on standard sample regression algorithm and cavity enhanced spectroscopy

Bian Xiao-Ge, Zhou Sheng, Zhang Lei, He Tian-Bo, Li Jin-Song
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • Cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy is a highly sensitive trace gas measurement technology, and the algorithm for retrieving gas concentrations is critical. The absorption cross-section is traditionally used to retrieve the concentration. However, the absorption cross-section used in the fitting process is affected not only by the response function of the instrument and the light source, but also by temperature and pressure. The uncertainty of the absorption cross-section will influence the accuracy of the result. Therefore, in order to eliminate the measurement error introduced by the uncertainty of the absorption cross-section and the instrument response function, a concentration regression algorithm based on the absorption spectrum of the standard sample is proposed. The process of concentration inversion is optimized. The absorption spectrum of standard gas is used to fit the unknown spectrum. In order to verify the effectiveness of the algorithm, the incoherent cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy (IBBCEAS) system based on a blue light-emitting diode (LED) operating at 440 nm is established to analyze the absorption spectrum of NO2; and the fitting effect, measurement accuracy and stability are compared with the counter parts from the traditional absorption cross-section method. In the experiment, the measured reflectance of the cavity mirror is 99.915%. Compared with the conventional absorption cross-section regression algorithm, the standard sample regression algorithm proposed in this paper shows good results, in which the measurement accuracy is increased by about quadruple. The Allan deviation shows that a detection limit of 5.3 ppb can be achieved at an integration time of 360 s. Finally, the performance of the experimental system is evaluated by measuring the NO2 with different concentrations prepared by standard samples. The result shows good agreement with the theoretical value, which indicates that the improved spectral analysis algorithm is feasible and reliable for gas detection. This method can be used not only to measure NO2, but also to detect other gases, which shows great potential applications in monitoring the industrial emissions, atmospheric chemistry and exhaled breath analysis.
      Corresponding author: Zhou Sheng, optzsh@ahu.edu.cn ; Li Jin-Song, ljs0625@126.com
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61905001, 41875158, 61705001, 61705002, 61675005), the National Key R&D Project of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0302202), the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province, China (Grant Nos. 1908085QF276, 1808085QF198, 1508085MF118), and the Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Anhui Province, China (Grant No. KJ2018A0034)
    [1]

    段秋宴 2019 环境与发展 31 155Google Scholar

    Duan Q Y 2019 Environ. Dev. 31 155Google Scholar

    [2]

    韩荦, 夏滑, 董凤忠, 张志荣, 庞涛, 孙鹏帅, 吴边, 崔小娟, 李哲, 余润磬 2018 中国激光 45 43Google Scholar

    Han L, Xia H, Dong F Z, Zhang Z R, Pang T, Sun P S, Wu B, Cui X J, Li Z, Yu R Q 2018 Chin. J. Lasers 45 43Google Scholar

    [3]

    Min K E, Washenfelder R A, Dubé W P, Langford A O, Edwards P, Zarzana K J, Stutz J, Lu K, Rohrer F, Zhang Y H, Brown S S 2015 Atmos. Meas. Tech. 9 11209Google Scholar

    [4]

    Engeln R, Berden G, Peeters R, Meijei G 1998 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 69 3763Google Scholar

    [5]

    O’keefe A 1998 Chem. Phys. Lett. 293 331Google Scholar

    [6]

    Fiedler S E, Hoheisel G, Ruth A A, Hese A 2003 Chem. Phys. Lett. 382 447Google Scholar

    [7]

    Wu T, Zha Q Z, Chen W D, Xu Z, Wang T, He X D 2014 Atmos. Environ. 95 544Google Scholar

    [8]

    Nakashima Y, Sadanaga Y 2017 Anal. Sci. 33 519Google Scholar

    [9]

    段俊, 秦敏, 方武, 胡仁志, 卢雪, 沈兰兰, 王丹, 谢品华, 刘建国, 刘文清 2016 光谱学与光谱分析 36 466Google Scholar

    Duan J, Qin M, Fang W, Hu R Z, Lu X, Shen L L, Wang D, Xie P H, Liu J G, Liu W Q 2016 Spectrosc. Spect. Anal. 36 466Google Scholar

    [10]

    Liu J W, Li X, Yang Y M, Wang H C, Wu Y S, Lu X W, Chen M D, Hu J L, Fan X B, Zeng L M, Zhang Y H 2019 Atmos. Meas. Tech. 12 4439Google Scholar

    [11]

    Jordan N, Ye C Z, Ghosh S, Washenfelder R A, Brown S S, Osthoff H D 2019 Atmos. Meas. Tech. 12 1277Google Scholar

    [12]

    Jodan N, Osthoff H D 2020 Atmos. Meas. Tech. 13 285Google Scholar

    [13]

    Duan J, Qin M, Ouyang B, Fang W, Li X, Lu K D, Tang K, Liang S X, Meng F H, Hu Z K, Xie P H, Liu W Q, Häsler R 2018 Atmos. Meas. Tech. 11 4531Google Scholar

    [14]

    Liang S X, Qin M, Xie P H, Duan J, Fang W, He Y B, Xu J, Liu J W, Li X, Tang K, Meng F H, Ye K D, Liu J G, Liu W Q 2019 Atmos. Meas. Tech. 12 2499Google Scholar

    [15]

    吴涛, 陈卫东, 何兴道 2015 光谱学与光谱分析 35 2989Google Scholar

    Wu T, Chen W D, He X D 2015 Spectrosc. Spect. Anal. 35 2989Google Scholar

    [16]

    凌六一, 秦敏, 谢品华, 胡仁志, 方武, 江宇, 刘建国, 刘文清 2012 物理学报 61 140703Google Scholar

    Ling L Y, Qin M, Xie P H, Hu R Z, Fang W, Jiang Y, Liu J G, Liu W Q 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 140703Google Scholar

    [17]

    Thalman R, Zarzana K J, Tolbert M A, Volkamer R 2014 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 147 171Google Scholar

    [18]

    Meng L S, Wang G X, Augustin P, Fourmentin M, Gou Q, Fertein E, Ba T N, Coeur C, Tomas A, Chen W D 2020 Opt. Lett. 45 1611Google Scholar

    [19]

    庞学霞, 邓泽超, 贾鹏英, 梁伟华 2011 物理学报 60 125201Google Scholar

    Pang X X, Deng Z C, Jia P Y, Liang W H 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 125201Google Scholar

    [20]

    赵士彬 2018 环境与发展 30 140Google Scholar

    Zhao S B 2018 Environ. Dev. 30 140Google Scholar

    [21]

    崔厚欣, 杜振辉, 陈文亮, 齐汝宾, 徐可欣 2008 天津大学学报 41 1162

    Cui H X, Du Z H, Chen W L, Qi R B, Xu K X 2008 J. Tianjin Univ. 41 1162

    [22]

    郑海明, 蔡小舒 2007 动力工程 27 130

    Zheng H M, Cai X S 2007 J. Power Eng. 27 130

    [23]

    Bogumil K, Orphal J, Burrows J P, Flaud J M 2001 Chem. Phys. Lett. 349 241Google Scholar

    [24]

    Mellqvist J, Rosen A 1996 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 56 187Google Scholar

    [25]

    Roehl C M, Orlando J J, Tyndall G S, Shetter R E, Vazquez G J, Cantrell C A, Calvert J G 1994 J. Phys. Chem. 98 7837Google Scholar

    [26]

    凌六一, 韦颖, 黄友锐, 胡仁志, 谢品华 2018 光谱学与光谱分析 38 670Google Scholar

    Ling L, Wei Y, Huang Y R, Hu R Z, Xie P H 2018 Spectrosc. Spect. Anal. 38 670Google Scholar

    [27]

    Washenfelder R A, Langford A O, Fuchs H, Brown S S 2008 Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8 7779Google Scholar

    [28]

    Ling L Y, Xie P H, Qin M, Fang W, Jiang Y, Hu R Z, Zheng N N 2013 Chin. Opt. Lett. 11 063001Google Scholar

    [29]

    Sneep M, Ubachs W 2005 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 92 293Google Scholar

    [30]

    Shardanand S, Rao A D P 1977 NASA Technical Note (Washington D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration)

    [31]

    Washenfelder R A, Attwood A R, Flores J M, Zarzana K J, Rudich Y, Brown S S 2015 Atmos. Meas. Tech. 9 41Google Scholar

    [32]

    Wu T, Chen W D, Fertein E, Cazier F, Dewaele D, Gao X M 2012 Appl. Phys. B 106 501Google Scholar

    [33]

    Bessant C, Saini S 2000 J. Electroanal. Chem. 489 76Google Scholar

    [34]

    Sun J, Ding J Y, Liu N W, Yang G X, Li J S 2018 Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 191 532Google Scholar

    [35]

    Brown S S, Stark H, Ciciora S J, Mclaughlin R J, Ravishankara A R 2002 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73 3291Google Scholar

    [36]

    Huang H F, Lehmann K K 2010 Appl. Opt. 49 1387Google Scholar

    [37]

    Li J S, Deng H, Sun J, Yu B L, Fischer H 2016 Sens. Actuators, B 231 723Google Scholar

  • 图 1  实验装置图

    Figure 1.  Schematic of experimental setup.

    图 2  (a) NO2吸收截面(蓝线)与LED发射光谱(红线); (b) LED输出功率与电流关系

    Figure 2.  (a) NO2 absorption cross-section (blue line) and LED emission spectrum (red line); (b) relationship between LED output power and current.

    图 3  拟合流程图

    Figure 3.  Flow chart of fitting.

    图 4  (a)随波长变化的反射率曲线; (b)腔损耗(黑线)和有效路径长度(绿线)

    Figure 4.  (a) Mirror reflectivity as a function of wavelength; (b) cavity loss (black line) and corresponding effective path length (green line).

    图 5  NO2吸收截面的卷积

    Figure 5.  Convolution of the NO2 absorption cross-section.

    图 6  NO2拟合结果 (a)实测吸收系数与标准吸收截面拟合; (b)拟合残差

    Figure 6.  The results of NO2 fitting: (a) Fitting between the measured absorption coefficient and the standard absorption cross section; (b) fitting residuals.

    图 7  多元线性拟合示意图

    Figure 7.  Multiple linear fitting diagram.

    图 8  NO2拟合结果 (a)实测吸收系数与标准气体吸收系数拟合; (b)−(g)拟合残差

    Figure 8.  The results of NO2 fitting: (a) Fitting of absorption coefficient between measured and standard gas; (b)−(g) fitting residuals.

    图 9  浓度值对比 (a)浓度计算结果; (b)绝对误差; (c)相对误差

    Figure 9.  Concentration comparison: (a) The calculated value of concentration; (b) absolute error; (c) relative error.

    图 10  系统稳定性评估 (a) 2 h的浓度数据; (b) Allan偏差图; (c)直方图分析

    Figure 10.  System stability assessment: (a) Concentration data recorded for 2 hours; (b) Allan deviation plots; (c) histogram analysis.

    图 11  (a) NO2气体的不同浓度; (b)浓度梯度平均值及标准偏差

    Figure 11.  (a) Different concentrations of NO2; (b) average and standard deviation of concentration gradient.

    表 1  不同NO2浓度对应的拟合残差的标准偏差和信噪比

    Table 1.  Standard deviation and signal-to-noise ratio of fitting residuals corresponding to different NO2 concentrations.

    浓度/ppm7.865.083.282.071.420.75
    标准偏差/(10–6 cm–1)12.358.135.273.442.621.57
    信噪比11.2311.0810.9510.389.728.94
    DownLoad: CSV

    表 2  不同NO2浓度对应的拟合残差的标准偏差和信噪比

    Table 2.  Standard deviation and signal-to-noise ratio of fitting residuals corresponding to different NO2 concentrations.

    浓度/ppm7.865.083.282.071.420.75
    标准偏差/(10–6 cm–1)2.71.671.360.780.620.59
    信噪比52.649.944.642.737.425.1
    DownLoad: CSV
  • [1]

    段秋宴 2019 环境与发展 31 155Google Scholar

    Duan Q Y 2019 Environ. Dev. 31 155Google Scholar

    [2]

    韩荦, 夏滑, 董凤忠, 张志荣, 庞涛, 孙鹏帅, 吴边, 崔小娟, 李哲, 余润磬 2018 中国激光 45 43Google Scholar

    Han L, Xia H, Dong F Z, Zhang Z R, Pang T, Sun P S, Wu B, Cui X J, Li Z, Yu R Q 2018 Chin. J. Lasers 45 43Google Scholar

    [3]

    Min K E, Washenfelder R A, Dubé W P, Langford A O, Edwards P, Zarzana K J, Stutz J, Lu K, Rohrer F, Zhang Y H, Brown S S 2015 Atmos. Meas. Tech. 9 11209Google Scholar

    [4]

    Engeln R, Berden G, Peeters R, Meijei G 1998 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 69 3763Google Scholar

    [5]

    O’keefe A 1998 Chem. Phys. Lett. 293 331Google Scholar

    [6]

    Fiedler S E, Hoheisel G, Ruth A A, Hese A 2003 Chem. Phys. Lett. 382 447Google Scholar

    [7]

    Wu T, Zha Q Z, Chen W D, Xu Z, Wang T, He X D 2014 Atmos. Environ. 95 544Google Scholar

    [8]

    Nakashima Y, Sadanaga Y 2017 Anal. Sci. 33 519Google Scholar

    [9]

    段俊, 秦敏, 方武, 胡仁志, 卢雪, 沈兰兰, 王丹, 谢品华, 刘建国, 刘文清 2016 光谱学与光谱分析 36 466Google Scholar

    Duan J, Qin M, Fang W, Hu R Z, Lu X, Shen L L, Wang D, Xie P H, Liu J G, Liu W Q 2016 Spectrosc. Spect. Anal. 36 466Google Scholar

    [10]

    Liu J W, Li X, Yang Y M, Wang H C, Wu Y S, Lu X W, Chen M D, Hu J L, Fan X B, Zeng L M, Zhang Y H 2019 Atmos. Meas. Tech. 12 4439Google Scholar

    [11]

    Jordan N, Ye C Z, Ghosh S, Washenfelder R A, Brown S S, Osthoff H D 2019 Atmos. Meas. Tech. 12 1277Google Scholar

    [12]

    Jodan N, Osthoff H D 2020 Atmos. Meas. Tech. 13 285Google Scholar

    [13]

    Duan J, Qin M, Ouyang B, Fang W, Li X, Lu K D, Tang K, Liang S X, Meng F H, Hu Z K, Xie P H, Liu W Q, Häsler R 2018 Atmos. Meas. Tech. 11 4531Google Scholar

    [14]

    Liang S X, Qin M, Xie P H, Duan J, Fang W, He Y B, Xu J, Liu J W, Li X, Tang K, Meng F H, Ye K D, Liu J G, Liu W Q 2019 Atmos. Meas. Tech. 12 2499Google Scholar

    [15]

    吴涛, 陈卫东, 何兴道 2015 光谱学与光谱分析 35 2989Google Scholar

    Wu T, Chen W D, He X D 2015 Spectrosc. Spect. Anal. 35 2989Google Scholar

    [16]

    凌六一, 秦敏, 谢品华, 胡仁志, 方武, 江宇, 刘建国, 刘文清 2012 物理学报 61 140703Google Scholar

    Ling L Y, Qin M, Xie P H, Hu R Z, Fang W, Jiang Y, Liu J G, Liu W Q 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 140703Google Scholar

    [17]

    Thalman R, Zarzana K J, Tolbert M A, Volkamer R 2014 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 147 171Google Scholar

    [18]

    Meng L S, Wang G X, Augustin P, Fourmentin M, Gou Q, Fertein E, Ba T N, Coeur C, Tomas A, Chen W D 2020 Opt. Lett. 45 1611Google Scholar

    [19]

    庞学霞, 邓泽超, 贾鹏英, 梁伟华 2011 物理学报 60 125201Google Scholar

    Pang X X, Deng Z C, Jia P Y, Liang W H 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 125201Google Scholar

    [20]

    赵士彬 2018 环境与发展 30 140Google Scholar

    Zhao S B 2018 Environ. Dev. 30 140Google Scholar

    [21]

    崔厚欣, 杜振辉, 陈文亮, 齐汝宾, 徐可欣 2008 天津大学学报 41 1162

    Cui H X, Du Z H, Chen W L, Qi R B, Xu K X 2008 J. Tianjin Univ. 41 1162

    [22]

    郑海明, 蔡小舒 2007 动力工程 27 130

    Zheng H M, Cai X S 2007 J. Power Eng. 27 130

    [23]

    Bogumil K, Orphal J, Burrows J P, Flaud J M 2001 Chem. Phys. Lett. 349 241Google Scholar

    [24]

    Mellqvist J, Rosen A 1996 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 56 187Google Scholar

    [25]

    Roehl C M, Orlando J J, Tyndall G S, Shetter R E, Vazquez G J, Cantrell C A, Calvert J G 1994 J. Phys. Chem. 98 7837Google Scholar

    [26]

    凌六一, 韦颖, 黄友锐, 胡仁志, 谢品华 2018 光谱学与光谱分析 38 670Google Scholar

    Ling L, Wei Y, Huang Y R, Hu R Z, Xie P H 2018 Spectrosc. Spect. Anal. 38 670Google Scholar

    [27]

    Washenfelder R A, Langford A O, Fuchs H, Brown S S 2008 Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8 7779Google Scholar

    [28]

    Ling L Y, Xie P H, Qin M, Fang W, Jiang Y, Hu R Z, Zheng N N 2013 Chin. Opt. Lett. 11 063001Google Scholar

    [29]

    Sneep M, Ubachs W 2005 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 92 293Google Scholar

    [30]

    Shardanand S, Rao A D P 1977 NASA Technical Note (Washington D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration)

    [31]

    Washenfelder R A, Attwood A R, Flores J M, Zarzana K J, Rudich Y, Brown S S 2015 Atmos. Meas. Tech. 9 41Google Scholar

    [32]

    Wu T, Chen W D, Fertein E, Cazier F, Dewaele D, Gao X M 2012 Appl. Phys. B 106 501Google Scholar

    [33]

    Bessant C, Saini S 2000 J. Electroanal. Chem. 489 76Google Scholar

    [34]

    Sun J, Ding J Y, Liu N W, Yang G X, Li J S 2018 Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 191 532Google Scholar

    [35]

    Brown S S, Stark H, Ciciora S J, Mclaughlin R J, Ravishankara A R 2002 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73 3291Google Scholar

    [36]

    Huang H F, Lehmann K K 2010 Appl. Opt. 49 1387Google Scholar

    [37]

    Li J S, Deng H, Sun J, Yu B L, Fischer H 2016 Sens. Actuators, B 231 723Google Scholar

  • [1] Chen Jin-Long, Tao Ran, Li Chong, Zhang Jian-Lei, Fu Chen, Luo JingTing. Gas sensors based on SnS2/In2O3 for high performance NO2 detection at room temperature. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 0(0): 0-0. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231554
    [2] Meng Fan-Hao, Qin Min, Fang Wu, Duan Jun, Tang Ke, Zhang He-Lu, Shao Dou, Liao Zhi-Tang, Xie Pin-Hua. Measurements of atmospheric HONO and NO2 utilizing an open-path broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy based on an iterative algorithm. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(12): 120701. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220150
    [3] Liu Sheng-Long, Yang Lu, Zhu Cheng-Jun, Liu Kai, Han Wei, Yao Jia-Feng. A method of identifying cell suspension concentration based on bioimpedance spectroscopy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(7): 078701. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211837
    [4] Liu Zhi-Fu, Li Pei, Cheng Tie-Dong, Huang Wen. NO2 sensing properties of porous Fe-doped indium oxide. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(24): 248101. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200956
    [5] Xu Qiu-Mei, Yang Zhi-Hu, Guo Yi-Pan, Liu Hui-Ping, Chen Yan-Hong, Zhao Hong-Yun. Visible light emission from surface of nickel bombarded by slow Xeq+ (4 q 20) ion. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(8): 083201. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172570
    [6] Liang Shuai-Xi, Qin Min, Duan Jun, Fang Wu, Li Ang, Xu Jin, Lu Xue, Tang Ke, Xie Pin-Hua, Liu Jian-Guo, Liu Wen-Qing. Airborne cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy for high time resolution measurements of atmospheric NO2. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(9): 090704. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.090704
    [7] Cui Lu, Tang Yi, Zhu Qing-Wei, Luo Jia-Bin, Hu Shan-Shan. Analysis of channel crosstalk in muliti-spectrum visible light communication system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(9): 094208. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.094208
    [8] Liu Jin, Zou Ying, Si Fu-Qi, Zhou Hai-Jin, Dou Ke, Wang Yu, Liu Wen-Qing. Two-dimensional observation of atmospheric trace gases based on the differential optical absorption spectroscopy technique. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(16): 164209. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.164209
    [9] Ling Liu-Yi, Xie Pin-Hua, Lin Pan-Pan, Huang You-Rui, Qin Min, Duan Jun, Hu Ren-Zhi, Wu Feng-Cheng. A concentration retrieval method for incoherent broadband cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy based on O2-O2 absorption. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(13): 130705. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.130705
    [10] Liu Jin, Si Fu-Qi, Zhou Hai-Jin, Zhao Ming-Jie, Dou Ke, Wang Yu, Liu Wen-Qing. Observation of two-dimensional distributions of NO2 with airborne Imaging DOAS technology. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(3): 034217. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.034217
    [11] Chen Tian-Bing, Yao Ming-Yin, Liu Mu-Hua, Lin Yong-Zeng, Li Wen-Bing, Zheng Mei-Lan, Zhou Hua-Mao. Quantitative analysis of laser induced breakdown spectroscopy of Pb in navel orange based on multivariate calibration. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(10): 104213. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.104213
    [12] Wang Ting, Wang Pu-Cai, Yu Huan, Zhang Xing-Ying, Zhou Bin, Si Fu-Qi, Wang Shan-Shan, Bai Wen-Guang, Zhou Hai-Jin, Zhao Heng. Intercomparison of slant column measurements of NO2 by ground-based MAX-DOAS. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(5): 054206. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.054206
    [13] Yan Liang, Chen Ke-An, Ruedi Stoop. Noise annoyance from a mixture of multiple single sources: rating and prediction. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(16): 164301. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.164301
    [14] Ling Liu-Yi, Qin Min, Xie Pin-Hua, Hu Ren-Zhi, Fang Wu, Jiang Yu, Liu Jian-Guo, Liu Wen-Qing. Incoherent broadband cavity enhanced absorption spectroscopy for measurements of HONO and NO2 with a LED optical source. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(14): 140703. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.140703
    [15] Wang Zhuo-Ru, Zhou Bin, Wang Shan-Shan, Yang Su-Na. Observation on the spatial distribution of air pollutants by active multi-axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(6): 060703. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.060703
    [16] Wang Na, Chen Ke-An. Regression model of timbre attribute for underwater noise and its application to target recognition. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(4): 2873-2881. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.2873
    [17] Zhang Gui-Yin, Jin Yi-Dong. Optical-optical double-color and double-resonance multiphoton ionization spectrum of NO2. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(1): 132-136. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.132
    [18] ZHANG YIN-CHAO, GONG ZHI-BEN. CALCULATION OF COLLISION BROADENING OF WATER VAPOR ABSORPTION LINES IN THE VISIBLE REGION. Acta Physica Sinica, 1993, 42(5): 741-749. doi: 10.7498/aps.42.741
    [19] WANG HUI, WANG RUO-ZHENG. ELECTROREFLECTANCE IN THE VISIBLE RANGE OF SPERCONDUCTING SYSTEM YBa2Cu3O7-δ. Acta Physica Sinica, 1989, 38(1): 145-148. doi: 10.7498/aps.38.145
    [20] ZHENG JIAN-SHENG. MEASUREMENT OF MINUTE RADIOMETRIC QUANTITIES IN THE SPECTRAL RANGE FROM VISIBLE TO NEAR INFRA-RED. Acta Physica Sinica, 1980, 29(3): 286-295. doi: 10.7498/aps.29.286
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  3874
  • PDF Downloads:  59
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  13 August 2020
  • Accepted Date:  13 September 2020
  • Available Online:  21 February 2021
  • Published Online:  05 March 2021

/

返回文章
返回