无线电掩星滑动频谱方法和后传播方法的分析比较

徐贤胜; 郭鹏; 黄思训; 项杰

doi:10.7498/aps.60.099202

摘要

本文详细介绍了滑动频谱方法,并通过模拟仿真和实测资料处理与后传播方法进行比较. 通过对模拟仿真信号反演发现:后传播方法和滑动频谱方法均能削弱大气多路径的影响,后传播方法在一定程度上优于滑动频谱方法;在模拟信号的相位中加入高斯噪声对后传播方法影响不大,但对滑动频谱方法影响较大,尤其在边界层以下. 分别用后传播方法和滑动频谱方法对2007年第71天至73天共约4500个COSMIC掩星数据进行处理. 将折射率反演结果与ECMWF分析场资料进行统计比较,结果显示:滑动频谱方法反演的掩星廓线深度大于后传播方法;后

关键词:

Abstract

The sliding spectral (SS) method of processing radio occultation data in multipath zone is introduced in detail and compared with back propagation (BP) method through processing simulated data and COSMIC soundings. The modeled signals are inverted with the use of two methods: BP method and SS method. Both methods can solve the problem of calculating bending angle profiles in multipath regions. Better agreement with Abel integral is indicated by the BP method. The BP method is almost free from noise, while the SS method will be affected severely by noise. About 4500 COSMIC radio occultation soundings are retrieved by the BP method and the SS method, and the statistical comparison of retrieved refractivity with that from ECMWF analyses shows that the SS method has better penetration ability than the BP method in the lower moist troposphere. The mean of fractional difference in refractivity retrieved by the BP method is generally smaller than that by the SS method.

Keywords:

作者及机构信息

(1)解放军理工大学气象学院,南京 211101; (2)上海大学上海市应用数学和力学研究所,上海 200072; (3)中国科学院上海天文台,上海 200030

基金项目: 地震行业科研专项(批准号:201108004),国家科技部863(批准号: 2009AA12Z319)和国家自然科学基金(批准号: 41075081)资助的课题.

Authors and contacts

(1)Institute of Meteorology, PLA University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 211101, China; (2)Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200030, China; (3)Shanghai Institute of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China

参考文献

[1]	Rocken C, Anthes R, Exner M, Hunt D, Sokolovskiy S, Ware R, Gorbunov M, Schreiner W, Feng D, Herman B, Kuo Y H, Zou X 1997 J. Geophys. Res. 102 29849
[2]	Gorbunov M E 2002 Radio Sci. 37 1
[3]	Hajj G A, Kursinski E R, Romans L J, Bertiger W I, Leroy S S 2002 J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 64 451
[4]	Guo P, Yan H J, Hong Z J, Liu M, Huang C 2005 Acta Astron. Sin. 46 96 (in Chinese)[郭鹏、严豪健、洪振杰、刘敏、黄珹 2005 天文学报 46 96]
[5]	Kuo Y H, Wee T K, Sokolovskiy S, Rocken C, Schreiner W, Hunt D, Anthes R A 2004 J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. 82 507
[6]	Sokolovskiy S V 2001 Radio Sci. 36 441
[7]	Hocke K, Pavelyev A G, Yakovlev O I, Barthes L, Jakwski N 1999 J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 61 1169
[8]	Beyerle G, Hocke K, Wickert J, Schmidt T, Marquardt C, Reigber C 2002 J. Geophys. Res. 107 4802
[9]	Gorbunov M E, Gurvich A S, Kornblueh L 2000 Radio Sci. 35 1025
[10]	Fritzer J, Kirchengast G, Pock M 2009 End-to-end generic occultation performance simulation and processing system version 5.5 (EGOPSv5.5) Software User Manual No. 01/2009 Wegener Centre & IGAM University of Graz Austria
[11]	Schreiner W, Rocken C, Sokolovskiy S, Syndergaard S, Hunt D 2007 Geophys. Res. Lett. 34 L04808
[12]	Anthes R A, Bernhardt P A, Chen Y, Cucurull L, Dymond K F, Ector D, Healy S B, Ho S P, Hunt D C, Kuo Y H, Liu H, Manning K, Mccormick C, Meehan T K, Randel W J, Rocken C, Schreiner W S, Sokolovskiy S V, Syndergaard S, Thompson D C, Trenberth K E, Wee T K, Yen N L, Zeng Z 2008 Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 89 313
[13]	Xu X S, Hong Z J, Guo P, Liu R J 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 2157 (in Chinese) [徐贤胜、洪振杰、郭鹏、刘荣建 2010 物理学报 59 2157]
[14]	Sokolovskiy S, Kuo Y H, Rocken C, Schreiner W S, Hunt D, Anthes R A 2006 Geophys. Res. Lett. 33 L12813
[15]	Sokolovskiy S, Rocken C, Schreiner W, Hunt D, Johnson J 2009 Radio Sci. 44 RS2002
[16]	Kursinski E R, Hajj G A, Leroy S S, Herman B 2000 Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. 11 53

施引文献

[1]	Rocken C, Anthes R, Exner M, Hunt D, Sokolovskiy S, Ware R, Gorbunov M, Schreiner W, Feng D, Herman B, Kuo Y H, Zou X 1997 J. Geophys. Res. 102 29849
[2]	Gorbunov M E 2002 Radio Sci. 37 1
[3]	Hajj G A, Kursinski E R, Romans L J, Bertiger W I, Leroy S S 2002 J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 64 451
[4]	Guo P, Yan H J, Hong Z J, Liu M, Huang C 2005 Acta Astron. Sin. 46 96 (in Chinese)[郭鹏、严豪健、洪振杰、刘敏、黄珹 2005 天文学报 46 96]
[5]	Kuo Y H, Wee T K, Sokolovskiy S, Rocken C, Schreiner W, Hunt D, Anthes R A 2004 J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. 82 507
[6]	Sokolovskiy S V 2001 Radio Sci. 36 441
[7]	Hocke K, Pavelyev A G, Yakovlev O I, Barthes L, Jakwski N 1999 J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 61 1169
[8]	Beyerle G, Hocke K, Wickert J, Schmidt T, Marquardt C, Reigber C 2002 J. Geophys. Res. 107 4802
[9]	Gorbunov M E, Gurvich A S, Kornblueh L 2000 Radio Sci. 35 1025
[10]	Fritzer J, Kirchengast G, Pock M 2009 End-to-end generic occultation performance simulation and processing system version 5.5 (EGOPSv5.5) Software User Manual No. 01/2009 Wegener Centre & IGAM University of Graz Austria
[11]	Schreiner W, Rocken C, Sokolovskiy S, Syndergaard S, Hunt D 2007 Geophys. Res. Lett. 34 L04808
[12]	Anthes R A, Bernhardt P A, Chen Y, Cucurull L, Dymond K F, Ector D, Healy S B, Ho S P, Hunt D C, Kuo Y H, Liu H, Manning K, Mccormick C, Meehan T K, Randel W J, Rocken C, Schreiner W S, Sokolovskiy S V, Syndergaard S, Thompson D C, Trenberth K E, Wee T K, Yen N L, Zeng Z 2008 Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 89 313
[13]	Xu X S, Hong Z J, Guo P, Liu R J 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 2157 (in Chinese) [徐贤胜、洪振杰、郭鹏、刘荣建 2010 物理学报 59 2157]
[14]	Sokolovskiy S, Kuo Y H, Rocken C, Schreiner W S, Hunt D, Anthes R A 2006 Geophys. Res. Lett. 33 L12813
[15]	Sokolovskiy S, Rocken C, Schreiner W, Hunt D, Johnson J 2009 Radio Sci. 44 RS2002
[16]	Kursinski E R, Hajj G A, Leroy S S, Herman B 2000 Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. 11 53

[1]	成浩, 韩培锋, 苏有文. 基于离散元方法的松散体滑动堆积特性及影响因素分析. 物理学报, 2020, 69(16): 164501. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200223
[2]	罗欢, 肖卉. 电离层回波谱展宽机理分析及频谱锐化方法. 物理学报, 2019, 68(21): 219401. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190887
[3]	张冬晓, 陈志斌, 肖程, 秦梦泽, 吴浩. 基于引力搜索算法的湍流相位屏生成方法. 物理学报, 2019, 68(13): 134205. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190081
[4]	孙海权, 王裴, 陈大伟, 马东军. 一种新的光子多普勒速度频谱分析方法. 物理学报, 2016, 65(10): 104702. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.104702
[5]	张京超, 付宁, 乔立岩, 彭喜元. 一种面向信息带宽的频谱感知方法研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(3): 030701. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.030701
[6]	蔡冬梅, 王昆, 贾鹏, 王东, 刘建霞. 功率谱反演大气湍流随机相位屏采样方法的研究. 物理学报, 2014, 63(10): 104217. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.104217
[7]	强洪夫, 石超, 陈福振, 韩亚伟. 基于大密度差多相流SPH方法的二维液滴碰撞数值模拟. 物理学报, 2013, 62(21): 214701. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.214701
[8]	毕研盟, 廖蜜, 张鹏, 马刚. 应用一维变分法反演GPS掩星大气温湿廓线. 物理学报, 2013, 62(15): 159301. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.159301
[9]	朱孟斌, 张卫民, 曹小群. GPS掩星一维弯曲角算子在四维变分资料同化系统中的实现方法研究. 物理学报, 2013, 62(18): 189203. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.189203
[10]	徐贤胜, 郭鹏, 洪振杰, 吴江飞. GPS/LEO掩星正则变换反演方法. 物理学报, 2013, 62(7): 079201. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.079201
[11]	徐贤胜, 郭鹏, 徐桃玲, 洪振杰. GPS/LEO无线电掩星开环反演技术. 物理学报, 2012, 61(19): 199202. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.199202
[12]	毕研盟, 陈洁, 杨光林, 廖蜜, 吴荣华. 基于改进的单差法计算GPS掩星附加相位. 物理学报, 2012, 61(14): 149301. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.149301
[13]	徐晓明, 苗伟, 陶琨. X射线衍射多相谱中某一物相点阵参数的直接求解方法. 物理学报, 2011, 60(8): 086101. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.086101
[14]	孙彪, 江建军. 标志位频谱感知方法研究. 物理学报, 2011, 60(11): 110701. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.110701
[15]	徐贤胜, 洪振杰, 郭鹏, 刘荣建. COSMIC掩星电离层资料反演以及结果验证. 物理学报, 2010, 59(3): 2163-2168. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.2163
[16]	钱仙妹, 朱文越, 饶瑞中. 非均匀湍流路径上光传播数值模拟的相位屏分布. 物理学报, 2009, 58(9): 6633-6639. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.6633
[17]	韩庆邦, 钱梦騄, 朱昌平. 激光超声方法研究固-固界面波传播特性. 物理学报, 2007, 56(1): 313-320. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.313
[18]	曹禹, 杨孔庆. 对声波和弹性波传播模拟的Hamilton系统方法. 物理学报, 2003, 52(8): 1984-1992. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.1984
[19]	刘业厚, 傅石友, 张鹏翔, 李秀英, 王云山. 研究界面多相吸附动力学的一个新方法——表面增强喇曼散射方法. 物理学报, 1993, 42(11): 1756-1761. doi: 10.7498/aps.42.1756
[20]	何豫生. 双窗函数方法及其在量子振荡频谱分析中的应用. 物理学报, 1986, 35(4): 443-450. doi: 10.7498/aps.35.443

计量

文章访问数: 8269
PDF下载量: 670
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

搜索

留言板