搜索

x
中国物理学会期刊
Chinese Physics Letters Chinese Physics B 物理学报 物理 中国物理学会期刊网
高级检索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

源自弦景观的有效Quintessence

翟韩豫 ,  申佳音 ,  薛迅

downloadPDF
引用本文:
shu
Citation:
shu
下一篇 上一篇

源自弦景观的有效Quintessence

翟韩豫, 申佳音, 薛迅
物理学报, 2019, 68(13): 139501.
doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190282

Effective quintessence from string landscape

Zhai Han-Yu, Shen Jia-Yin, Xue Xun
Acta Phys. Sin., 2019, 68(13): 139501.
doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190282
PDF
HTML
导出引用

  • 摘要

    最近Vafa等人提出了两个弦沼泽地的判据, 并且在研究宇宙学中两个弦沼泽地判据所施加的约束条件时, 发现暴胀模型通常与这两个判据很难相容. 将这两个判据应用于当前时期宇宙的加速膨胀时, 发现特定的quintessence模型可以满足这些限制, 同时满足根据当前观测所施加的约束. 基于大尺度洛伦兹破缺的宇宙学模型, 我们得到了修正的Friedmann方程, 在计算的过程中给出了三种可行的近似, 并定义了一个有效的真空能量密度$ {\varLambda _{{\rm{eff}}}}$, 其行为对于弦景观表现为单调下降的类quintessence势能, 对于大部分具有裸的正真空能量密度的沼泽地, 有效宇宙学常数随时间的演化会出现局域极小. 将光度距离的计算结果与天文观测值做对比, 我们得到负宇宙学常数也可以使宇宙产生加速膨胀, 因而用亚稳的de Sitter真空来解释宇宙后期的加速膨胀是不必要的, 沼泽地猜想所导致的沼泽地模型与后期宇宙加速膨胀不相容性的困难也就不存在了.

    Abstract

    Recently, Vafa et al. proposed two string swampland criteria, and studying the constraints imposed by the two string swampland criteria on cosmology, they found that the inflationary models are generally difficult to be compatible with these two criteria. Applying these two criteria to the accelerated expansion of the universe during the current period, it was found that the specific quintessence model can satisfy these constraints while satisfying the constraints imposed by the current observations. Applying the gravitational theory of large scale Lorentz violation to cosmology, the vacuum energy density is not the only cause of the accelerated expansion of the universe. The large scale Lorentz violation combined with the cosmological constant term results in the observed accelerated expansion of the late universe. The vacuum energy density is a bit like a naked cosmological constant. The equivalent energy density considering the large scale Lorentz violation effect is the effective cosmological constant that determines the evolution of the universe. In this way, we find that the negative cosmological constant in the string landscape can also accelerate the expansion of the universe, and compared with the $ {\varLambda _{{\rm{CDM}}}}$ model, it leads to a cosmological constant as an effective vacuum energy density. Effective vacuum energy density behaves as a monotonically decreasing quintessence potential energy for the string landscape, for most of the naked positive vacuum energy densities in the swampland, the evolution of effective cosmological constant with time will show a local minimum. Comparing the calculated results of the distance modulus withthe astronomical observations, we can obtain that a negative cosmological constant also accelerates the expansion of the universe. Thus, the vacuum energy density derived from the string landscape will give quintessence potential that satisfies the swampland criterion, while the evolution of vacuum energy density given by the swampland model of the metastable dS vacuum is not quintessence potential, so it cannot satisfy the second de Sitter criterion. Therefore, the effective potential leading to the accelerated expansion of the late universe can only come from the string landscape, which is naturally UV completion. Therefore, it gives that the accelerated expansion of the late universe is the feature of early quantum gravity. It is not necessary to use the metastable de Sitter vacuum to explain the accelerated expansion of the late universe. The difficulty of incompatibility between the swampland model and the accelerated expansion of the late universe caused by the swampland conjecture will be eliminated.

    作者及机构信息

    • 1.

      华东师范大学物理系, 上海　200241

    • 2.

      新疆大学理论物理中心, 乌鲁木齐　830046

      • 通信作者: 薛迅, xxue@phy.ecnu.edu.cn
    • 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(批准号: 11435005, 11775080, 11865016)资助的课题.

    Authors and contacts

    • 1.

      Department of Physics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

    • 2.

      Center for theoretical Physics, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China

      • Corresponding author: Xue Xun, xxue@phy.ecnu.edu.cn
    • Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11435005, 11775080, 11865016).

    参考文献

    [1]

    Douglas M R 2003 J. High Energ. Phys. 2003 046
    [2]

    Douglas M R 2002 Unity from Duality: Gravity, Gauge Theory and Strings (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) pp455–475
    [3]

    Susskind L 2003 arXiv: hep-th/0302219[hep-th]
    [4]

    Vafa C 2005 arXiv: hep-th/0509212 [hep-th]
    [5]

    Ooguri H, Vafa C 2007 Nucl. Phys. B 766 21Google Scholar

    [6]

    Agrawal P, Obied G, Steinhardt P, Vafa C 2018 Phys. Lett. B 784 271Google Scholar

    [7]

    Obied G, Ooguri H, Spodyneiko L, Vafa C 2018 arXiv: 1806.08362[hep-th]
    [8]

    Brennan T D, Carta F, Vafa C 2017 arXiv: 1711.00864[hep-th]
    [9]

    Kachru S, Kallosh R, Linde A, Trivedi S P 2003 Phys. Rev. D 68 046005Google Scholar

    [10]

    Coleman S R, Glashow S L 1999 Phys. Rev. D 59 116008Google Scholar

    [11]

    Colladay D, Kostelecky V A 1998 Phys. Rev. D 58 116002Google Scholar

    [12]

    Shen J Y, Xue X 2018 arXiv: 1802.03502[gr-qc]
    [13]

    Wu Y W, Xue X, Yang L X, Yuan T 2016 Chin. Sci. Bull. 10 1360
    [14]

    Wu Y W, Xue X, Yang L X, Yuan T 2015 arXiv: 1510.00814v3[gr-qc]
    [15]

    魏文叶, 申佳音, 吴奕暐, 杨礼想, 薛迅, 阮自强 2017 物理学报 66 130301Google Scholar

    Wei W Y, Shen J Y, Wu Y W, Yang L X, Xue X, Yuan T C 2017 Acta. Phys. Sin. 66 130301Google Scholar

    [16]

    杨礼想, 吴奕暐, 魏文叶, 薛迅, 阮自强 2017 科学通报 62 944

    Yang L X, Wu Y W, Wei W Y, Xue X, Yuan T C 2017 Chin. Sci. Bull. 62 944
    [17]

    Wu Y W, Xue X 2016 J. East China Normal Univ. 3 76
    [18]

    Castelvecchi D, Witze A https://www.nature.com/news/einstein-s-gravitational-waves-found-at-last-1.19361 [2019-3-15]
    [19]

    Abbott B P 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 061102Google Scholar

    [20]

    Svitil K, Allen K, Kupec I, Ricci F, Milde S https://phys.org/news/2016-02-gravitational-years-einstein.html [2019-4-23]
    [21]

    Deser S, Woodard R P 2019 arXiv: 1902.08075 [gr-qc]
    [22]

    Rajvanshi M P, Chakraborty T, Bagla J S 2018 arXiv: 1803.04267 [physics.pop-ph]
    [23]

    Cai R G, Khimphun S, Lee B H, Sun S, Tumurtushaa G, Zhang Y L 2018 arXiv: 1812.11105 [hep-th]
    [24]

    Dimopoulos K, Markkanen T 2018 arXiv: 1807.04359 [astro-ph.CO]
    [25]

    Glavan D, Prokopec T, Starobinsky A A 2018 Eur. Phys. J. C 78 371Google Scholar

    [26]

    Dinda B R 2019 arXiv: 1904.10418 [astro-ph.CO]
    [27]

    Dimakis N, Paliathanasis A, Terzis P A, Christodoulakis T 2019 arXiv: 1904.09713 [gr-qc]
    [28]

    Johnson J P, Shankaranarayanan S 2019 arXiv: 1904.07608 [astro-ph.CO]
    [29]

    Rani S, Jawad A, Bamba K, Malik I U 2019 arXiv: 1904.04633 [physics.gen-ph]
    [30]

    Li X L, Shafieloo A, Sahni V, Starobinsky A A 2019 arXiv: 1904.03790 [astro-ph.CO]
    [31]

    Zhang H C, Xu L X 2019 arXiv: 1904.03545 [gr-qc]
    [32]

    Nielsen J T, Guffanti A, Sarkar S 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 219
    [33]

    Lukierski J, Nowicki A 2003 Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18 7Google Scholar

  • 图 1  亚稳态dS的标量势V

    Fig. 1.  The scalar potential V for a metastable dS.

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 2  不稳定dS的标量势V

    Fig. 2.  The scalar potential V for an unstable dS.

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 3  ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} - 1} \right)$, ${w_0} = - 0.88$时哈勃常数随时间的演化　(a) ${\varLambda _0} = - {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $; (b) ${\varLambda _0} = 0$; (c) ${\varLambda _0} = {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $

    Fig. 3.  The Hubble constant evolves with the time when ${w_0} = - 0.88$, ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} - 1} \right)$: (a) ${\varLambda _0} = - {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $; (b) ${\varLambda _0} = 0$; (c) $ {\varLambda _0} = {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $.

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 4  ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = - {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} + 1} \right)$, ${w_0} = - 0.88$时哈勃常数随时间的演化　(a) ${\varLambda _0} = - {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $; (b) ${\varLambda _0} = 0$; (c) ${\varLambda _0} = {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $

    Fig. 4.  The Hubble constant evolves with the time when ${w_0} = - 0.88$, ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = - {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} + 1} \right)$: (a) ${\varLambda _0} = - {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $; (b) ${\varLambda _0} = 0$; (c) $ {\varLambda _0} = {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $.

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 5  ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} - 1} \right)$, ${w_0} = - 0.88$时${\cal{K}}$随时间的演化　(a) ${\varLambda _0} = - {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $; (b) ${\varLambda _0} = 0$; (c) ${\varLambda _0} = {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $

    Fig. 5.  ${\cal{K}}$ evolves with the time when ${w_0} = - 0.88$, ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} - 1} \right)$: (a) ${\varLambda _0} = - {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $; (b) ${\varLambda _0} = 0$; (c) ${\varLambda _0} = {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $.

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 6  ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = - {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} + 1} \right)$, ${w_0} = - 0.88$时${\cal{K}}$随时间的演化　(a) ${\varLambda _0} = - {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $; (b) ${\varLambda _0} = 0$; (c) ${\varLambda _0} = {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $

    Fig. 6.  ${\cal{K}}$ evolves with the time when ${w_0} = - 0.88$, ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = - {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} + 1} \right)$: (a) ${\varLambda _0} = - {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $; (b) ${\varLambda _0} = 0$; (c) ${\varLambda _0} = {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $.

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 7  ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} - 1} \right)$, ${w_0} = - 0.88$时光度距离随红移的演化 (a) ${\varLambda _0} = - {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $; (b) ${\varLambda _0} = 0$; (c) ${\varLambda _0} = {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $

    Fig. 7.  The luminosity distance evolves with the redshift when ${w_0} = - 0.88$, ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} - 1} \right)$: (a) ${\varLambda _0} = - {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $; (b) ${\varLambda _0} = 0$; (c) ${\varLambda _0} = {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $.

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 8  ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = - {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} + 1} \right)$, ${w_0} = - 0.88$时光度距离随红移的演化 (a) ${\varLambda _0} = - {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $; (b) ${\varLambda _0} = 0$; (c) ${\varLambda _0} = {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $

    Fig. 8.  the luminosity distance evolves with the redshift when ${w_0} = - 0.88$, ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = - {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} + 1} \right)$ (a) ${\varLambda _0} = - {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $; (b) ${\varLambda _0} = 0$; (c) ${\varLambda _0} = {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $.

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 9  ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} - 1} \right)$, ${w_0} = - 0.88$时距离模数测量值与理论期望值的对比　(a) ${\varLambda _0} = - {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $; (b) ${\varLambda _0} = 0$; (c) ${\varLambda _0} = {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $

    Fig. 9.  Comparison of the measured distance moduluswith its expected value when ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} - 1} \right)$, ${w_0} = - 0.88$: (a) ${\varLambda _0} = - {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $; (b) ${\varLambda _0} = 0$; (c) $ {\varLambda _0} = {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda$

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 10  ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = - {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} + 1} \right)$, ${w_0} = - \dfrac{8}{9}$时距离模数实验测量值与理论期望值的对比　(a) ${\varLambda _0} = - 0.2\varLambda $; (b) ${\varLambda _0} = 0$; (c) ${\varLambda _0} = {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda $

    Fig. 10.  Comparison of the measured distance moduluswith its expected value when ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right)\!=\!- {H_0}\left(\!{\sqrt {1\!-\!\dfrac{{\varLambda\!-\!{\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}}\!+\!1}\!\right)$, ${w_0} = - \dfrac{8}{9}$: (a) ${\varLambda _0} = - 0.2\varLambda $; (b) ${\varLambda _0} = 0$; (c) $ {\varLambda _0} = {\rm{0}}.{\rm{2}}\varLambda$.

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 11  ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} - 1} \right)$时${\varLambda _{{\rm{eff}}}}$从单调的quintessence类型到随时间的演化出现局域极小类型的转变　(a) CaseA1; (b) CaseB1; (c) CaseC1, ${w_0} = - 1$; (d) CaseC1, ${w_0} = - \dfrac{8}{9}$

    Fig. 11.  ${\varLambda _{{\rm{eff}}}}$ shifts from a monotonically decreasing quintessence type to a local minimal type transition with time evolution when ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} - 1} \right)$ (a) CaseA1; (b) CaseB1; (c) CaseC1, ${w_0} = - 1$; (d) CaseC1, ${w_0} = - \dfrac{8}{9}$.

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    图 12  ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = - {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} + 1} \right)$时${\varLambda _{{\rm{eff}}}}$从单调的quintessence类型到随时间的演化出现局域极小类型的转变　(a) CaseA2; (b) CaseB2; (c) CaseC2, ${w_0} = - 1$; (d) CaseC2, ${w_0} = - \dfrac{8}{9}$

    Fig. 12.  ${\varLambda _{{\rm{eff}}}}$ shifts from a monotonically decreasing quintessence type to a local minimal type transition with time evolution when ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = - {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} + 1} \right)$ (a) CaseA2; (b) CaseB2; (c) CaseC2, ${w_0} = - 1$; (d) CaseC2, ${w_0} = - \dfrac{8}{9}$.

    下载: 全尺寸图片 幻灯片

    表 1  Lorentz破缺宇宙学的几种模型

    Table 1.  Proposed models of Lorentz violation cosmology.

    ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right)$的值${\cal{K}}\left( t \right)$的方程
    CaseA1${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} - 1} \right)$ $H\left( t \right){\cal{K}}\left( t \right) + {\dot {\cal{K}}}\left( t \right) = \dfrac{1}{3}\left( {{\varLambda _0} - \varLambda } \right);$
    CaseA2${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = - {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} + 1} \right)$$H\left( t \right){\cal{K}}\left( t \right) + \dot {\cal{K}}\left( t \right) = \dfrac{1}{3}\left( {{\varLambda _0} - \varLambda } \right);$
    CaseB1${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} - 1} \right)$$\dot {\cal{K}} + 2H{\cal{K}} + \dfrac{1}{2}{{\cal{K}}^2} = \dfrac{1}{2}\left( {{\varLambda _0} - \varLambda } \right);$
    CaseB2${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = - {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} + 1} \right)$$\dot {\cal{K}} + 2H{\cal{K}} + \dfrac{1}{2}{{\cal{K}}^2} = \dfrac{1}{2}\left( {{\varLambda _0} - \varLambda } \right);$
    CaseC1${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} - 1} \right)$$\begin{array}{l} \left( {3{w_0} + 1} \right){{\cal{K}}^2} + \left( {6{w_0} + 4} \right)H{\cal{K}} + 2\dot {\cal{K}} = \left( {{w_0} + 1} \right){\varLambda _0}; \\ \end{array} $
    CaseC2${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = - {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} + 1} \right)$$\begin{array}{l} \left( {3{w_0} + 1} \right){{\cal{K}}^2} + \left( {6{w_0} + 4} \right)H{\cal{K}} + 2\dot {\cal{K}} = \left( {{w_0} + 1} \right){\varLambda _0}. \\ \end{array} $
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  在不同模型下有无${\varLambda _0}$的临界值

    Table 2.  Whether there are critical values of ${\varLambda _0}$ under different models

    ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right)$的值${\varLambda _0}$的临界值
    CaseA${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} - 1} \right)$$ - 0.05\varLambda $
    ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = - {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} + 1} \right)$$ - 0.187\varLambda $
    CaseB${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} - 1} \right)$$ - 0.066\varLambda $
    ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = - {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} + 1} \right)$$ - 0.2144\varLambda $
    CaseC (${w_0} = - 1$) ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} - 1} \right)$$0.00001\varLambda $
    ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = - {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} + 1} \right)$$0.00001\varLambda $
    CaseC(${w_0} = - {8}/{9}$)${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} - 1} \right)$$0.119\varLambda $
    ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = - {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} + 1} \right)$$0.075\varLambda $
    CaseC(${w_0} = - {7}/{9}$)${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} - 1} \right)$无
    ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = - {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} + 1} \right)$$0.152\varLambda $
    CaseC(${w_0} = - {2}/{3}$)${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} - 1} \right)$ 无
    ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = - {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} + 1} \right)$$0.225\varLambda $
    CaseC(${w_0} = - {1}/{3}$)${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} - 1} \right)$ 无
    ${\cal{K}}\left( {{t_0}} \right) = - {H_0}\left( {\sqrt {1 - \dfrac{{\varLambda - {\varLambda _0}}}{{3{H_0}^2}}} + 1} \right)$$0.397\varLambda $
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Douglas M R 2003 J. High Energ. Phys. 2003 046
    [2]

    Douglas M R 2002 Unity from Duality: Gravity, Gauge Theory and Strings (Berlin: Springer-Verlag) pp455–475
    [3]

    Susskind L 2003 arXiv: hep-th/0302219[hep-th]
    [4]

    Vafa C 2005 arXiv: hep-th/0509212 [hep-th]
    [5]

    Ooguri H, Vafa C 2007 Nucl. Phys. B 766 21Google Scholar

    [6]

    Agrawal P, Obied G, Steinhardt P, Vafa C 2018 Phys. Lett. B 784 271Google Scholar

    [7]

    Obied G, Ooguri H, Spodyneiko L, Vafa C 2018 arXiv: 1806.08362[hep-th]
    [8]

    Brennan T D, Carta F, Vafa C 2017 arXiv: 1711.00864[hep-th]
    [9]

    Kachru S, Kallosh R, Linde A, Trivedi S P 2003 Phys. Rev. D 68 046005Google Scholar

    [10]

    Coleman S R, Glashow S L 1999 Phys. Rev. D 59 116008Google Scholar

    [11]

    Colladay D, Kostelecky V A 1998 Phys. Rev. D 58 116002Google Scholar

    [12]

    Shen J Y, Xue X 2018 arXiv: 1802.03502[gr-qc]
    [13]

    Wu Y W, Xue X, Yang L X, Yuan T 2016 Chin. Sci. Bull. 10 1360
    [14]

    Wu Y W, Xue X, Yang L X, Yuan T 2015 arXiv: 1510.00814v3[gr-qc]
    [15]

    魏文叶, 申佳音, 吴奕暐, 杨礼想, 薛迅, 阮自强 2017 物理学报 66 130301Google Scholar

    Wei W Y, Shen J Y, Wu Y W, Yang L X, Xue X, Yuan T C 2017 Acta. Phys. Sin. 66 130301Google Scholar

    [16]

    杨礼想, 吴奕暐, 魏文叶, 薛迅, 阮自强 2017 科学通报 62 944

    Yang L X, Wu Y W, Wei W Y, Xue X, Yuan T C 2017 Chin. Sci. Bull. 62 944
    [17]

    Wu Y W, Xue X 2016 J. East China Normal Univ. 3 76
    [18]

    Castelvecchi D, Witze A https://www.nature.com/news/einstein-s-gravitational-waves-found-at-last-1.19361 [2019-3-15]
    [19]

    Abbott B P 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 061102Google Scholar

    [20]

    Svitil K, Allen K, Kupec I, Ricci F, Milde S https://phys.org/news/2016-02-gravitational-years-einstein.html [2019-4-23]
    [21]

    Deser S, Woodard R P 2019 arXiv: 1902.08075 [gr-qc]
    [22]

    Rajvanshi M P, Chakraborty T, Bagla J S 2018 arXiv: 1803.04267 [physics.pop-ph]
    [23]

    Cai R G, Khimphun S, Lee B H, Sun S, Tumurtushaa G, Zhang Y L 2018 arXiv: 1812.11105 [hep-th]
    [24]

    Dimopoulos K, Markkanen T 2018 arXiv: 1807.04359 [astro-ph.CO]
    [25]

    Glavan D, Prokopec T, Starobinsky A A 2018 Eur. Phys. J. C 78 371Google Scholar

    [26]

    Dinda B R 2019 arXiv: 1904.10418 [astro-ph.CO]
    [27]

    Dimakis N, Paliathanasis A, Terzis P A, Christodoulakis T 2019 arXiv: 1904.09713 [gr-qc]
    [28]

    Johnson J P, Shankaranarayanan S 2019 arXiv: 1904.07608 [astro-ph.CO]
    [29]

    Rani S, Jawad A, Bamba K, Malik I U 2019 arXiv: 1904.04633 [physics.gen-ph]
    [30]

    Li X L, Shafieloo A, Sahni V, Starobinsky A A 2019 arXiv: 1904.03790 [astro-ph.CO]
    [31]

    Zhang H C, Xu L X 2019 arXiv: 1904.03545 [gr-qc]
    [32]

    Nielsen J T, Guffanti A, Sarkar S 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 219
    [33]

    Lukierski J, Nowicki A 2003 Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 18 7Google Scholar

  • [1] 王恩权, 陈浩, 杨毅, 隆正文, HassanabadiHassan. 洛伦兹对称破缺框架下的广义克莱因-戈尔登谐振子. 物理学报, 2022, 71(6): 060301. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211733
    [2] 蒲瑾, 杨树政, 林恺. 洛伦兹破缺理论与Vaidya黑洞弯曲时空中的Dirac粒子隧穿辐射特征. 物理学报, 2019, 68(19): 190401. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190437
    [3] 董成伟. 非扩散洛伦兹系统的周期轨道. 物理学报, 2018, 67(24): 240501. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181581
    [4] 代尚军, 吴思进, 王晓东, 史祎诗. 融合散斑干涉技术的阵列式洛伦兹力微颗粒探测方法. 物理学报, 2017, 66(20): 208102. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.208102
    [5] 魏文叶, 申佳音, 吴奕暐, 杨礼想, 薛迅, 阮自强. 大尺度有效引力的E(2)规范理论模型. 物理学报, 2017, 66(13): 130301. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.130301
    [6] 陈耀慧, 董祥瑞, 陈志华, 张辉, 栗保明, 范宝春. 翼型绕流的洛伦兹力控制机理. 物理学报, 2014, 63(3): 034701. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.034701
    [7] 赵建利, 王京, 王慧. 洛伦兹-哈肯激光混沌系统有限时间稳定主动控制方法研究. 物理学报, 2012, 61(11): 110209. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.110209
    [8] 周先春, 林万涛, 林一骅, 姚静荪, 莫嘉琪. 一类扰动洛伦兹系统的解法. 物理学报, 2011, 60(11): 110207. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.110207
    [9] 李季根, 颜骏, 邹伯夏, 苏文杰. 奇异物质与暗能量作用的sine-Gordon孤子星模型. 物理学报, 2011, 60(5): 050301. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.050301
    [10] 张霖, 张淳民, 简小华. 高层大气风场洛伦兹光谱线型粒子辐射率探测研究. 物理学报, 2010, 59(2): 899-906. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.899
    [11] 张丽春, 李怀繁, 赵仁. Schwarzchild-de Sitter 黑洞的热力学性质. 物理学报, 2010, 59(12): 8994-8998. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.8994
    [12] 龚添喜, 王永久. 包围有暗能量黑洞的Hawking辐射修正. 物理学报, 2010, 59(10): 6842-6846. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6842
    [13] 张莹, 雷佑铭, 方同. 混沌吸引子的对称破缺激变. 物理学报, 2009, 58(6): 3799-3805. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.3799
    [14] 周国泉. 洛伦兹光束经光阑失调傍轴光学系统的传输. 物理学报, 2009, 58(9): 6185-6191. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.6185
    [15] 邓 强, 颜 骏. 有限温度下的二维暗能量星模型. 物理学报, 2008, 57(7): 3978-3982. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.3978
    [16] 程兴华, 唐龙谷, 陈志涛, 龚 敏, 于彤军, 张国义, 石瑞英. GaMnN材料红外光谱中洛伦兹振子模型的遗传算法研究. 物理学报, 2008, 57(9): 5875-5880. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.5875
    [17] 周国泉. 洛伦兹光束的传输特性研究. 物理学报, 2008, 57(6): 3494-3498. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.3494
    [18] 吴亚波, 吕剑波, 李 松, 杨秀一. 五维大反弹宇宙学模型的重建及其相关宇宙学量的演化. 物理学报, 2008, 57(4): 2621-2626. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.2621
    [19] 赵保恒. 自发破缺规范理论中的光子-光子散射. 物理学报, 1976, 25(1): 53-57. doi: 10.7498/aps.25.53
    [20] 周培源. 膨胀宇宙新论. 物理学报, 1935, 1(3): 1-17. doi: 10.7498/aps.1.1-2
目录
计量
  • 文章访问数:  7430
  • PDF下载量:  48
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-03-01
  • 修回日期:  2019-04-25
  • 上网日期:  2019-07-01
  • 刊出日期:  2019-07-05

/

返回文章
返回

作者中心

审稿中心

关于期刊

关于我们

版权所有 ©物理学报 京ICP备05002789号-1

地址：北京市603信箱，《物理学报》编辑部邮编：100190

电话：010-82649829，82649241,82649863Email：apsoffice@iphy.ac.cn   百度统计