搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

重费米子超导体CeRh2As2的电热输运研究

万臻哲 王涵儒 王晶 GRZEGORZ Chajewski DARIUSZ Kaczorowski 李世燕

引用本文:
Citation:

重费米子超导体CeRh2As2的电热输运研究

万臻哲, 王涵儒, 王晶, GRZEGORZ Chajewski, DARIUSZ Kaczorowski, 李世燕

Electrical and thermal transport of heavy Fermion superconductor CeRh2As2

WAN Zhenzhe, WANG Hanru, WANG Jing, GRZEGORZ Chajewski, DARIUSZ Kaczorowski, LI Shiyan
Article Text (iFLYTEK Translation)
PDF
HTML
导出引用
  • 研究了两相重费米子超导体CeRh2As2在不同磁场下的电热输运行为. 零场电阻率显示, CeRh2As2在临界温度Tc = 0.34 K发生超导转变. 在外加磁场为1 T时, 电阻率在T0$ \approx $0.42 K附近出现极小值, 该特征可能源于费米面嵌套引发的能隙部分打开, 标志着体系进入磁有序态, 但在零场条件下未观察到这一现象. 在T0至2 K温区, 体系表现出$ \rho\sim{{T}}^{0.44} $的非费米液体行为, 说明其靠近量子临界点. 当外加磁场达到7 T时, 超导转变被完全压制, 电阻率在低温下恢复费米液体行为. CeRh2As2的零场热导率在Tc附近未观测到显著异常, 这一现象可能与样品较高的剩余电阻率以及伴随超导转变和T0相变发生的载流子浓度下降相关, 需要优化样品的制备从而减小晶格缺陷或化学无序对热输运测量的影响. 施加磁场后, 热导率曲线相较零场小幅上移. 当温度为0.15 K时, 热导率随磁场增大而升高, 随着外场升至5 T以上, 热导率趋于饱和. 在7 T的正常态, 我们发现电阻率和热导率满足Wiedemann-Franz定律, 表明电荷输运与热输运均由同一类准粒子主导, 这与该磁场下电阻率呈现的费米液体行为相吻合.
    CeRh2As2, as a recently discovered Ce-based 122-type heavy-fermion superconductor, has attracted much attention due to its non-Fermi-liquid behavior and two-phase superconductivity. The tetragonal crystal structure of CeRh2As2 maintains global centrosymmetry, which makes even-parity and odd-parity superconducting states different rather than mixed. The Ce site exhibits local inversion symmetry breaking, which results in staggered Rashba spin-orbit coupling. This may lead to the c axis field-induced transition between two superconducting phases and high critical field. Given the novel physics in CeRh2As2, including a possible quantum critical point and a spin-fluctuation-mediated superconducting pairing mechanism, the ultra-low-temperature electrical and thermal transport properties of CeRh2As2 under various magnetic fields are investigated in this work. The zero-field resistivity reveals a superconducting transition at the critical temperature Tc = 0.34 K. At a magnetic field of 1 T, a minimum resistivity appears near T0$ \approx $0.42 K, which may be due to partial gap opening caused by Fermi surface nesting, indicating that the system enters into a magnetically ordered state, which is not observed in zero field. In the temperature range from T0 to 2 K, the system exhibits non-Fermi-liquid behavior $ \rho\sim{{T}}^{0.44} $, indicating proximity to a quantum critical point. The superconducting transition is fully suppressed at 7 T, with resistivity recovering Fermi-liquid behavior at low temperature. No significant anomaly is observed in the zero-field thermal conductivity of CeRh2As2 near Tc. This absence of anomaly may be attributed to the high residual resistivity of the sample, and the reduction in carrier density during the superconducting transition and the T0 phase transition. It requires optimizing single crystal growth to reduce the effects of lattice defects or chemical disorder on thermal transport. Upon applying magnetic field, the thermal conductivity curve exhibits a small upward shift relative to its zero-field curve. At 0.15 K, thermal conductivity rises with the increase of magnetic field and is saturated at higher fields (above 5 T). In the normal state at 7 T, it is found that the electrical resistivity and thermal conductivity satisfy the Wiedemann-Franz law, indicating that the charge transfer and the heat transport are governed by the same quasiparticles, which is consistent with the Fermi-liquid behavior observed in resistivity under this field.
  • 图 1  (a) CeRh2As2单晶的XRD谱, 插图为单晶的光学照片以及晶体结构示意图; (b) μ0H = 1 T下CeRh2As2单晶直流磁化率的倒数, 磁场方向分别沿ab面(红色)和晶体c轴(蓝色), 虚线斜率用于计算Ce3+的有效磁矩; (c) 零场下CeRh2As2单晶电阻率随温度变化, 插图为低于2 K的电阻率以及粘有4个电极的样品光学照片

    Fig. 1.  (a) XRD pattern of CeRh2As2 single crystal, with the inset displaying the optical image of the single crystal and a schematic illustration of its crystal structure. (b) Reciprocal of the direct current magnetic susceptibility of CeRh2As2 single crystals at μ0H = 1 T, with magnetic field in the ab plane (red) and along the c axis (blue). The slope of the dashed line is used to calculate the effective magnetic moment of Ce3+. (c) Temperature dependence of the resistivity of CeRh2As2 single crystal in zero field. The inset displays the resistivity below 2 K along with an optical image of the sample with four electrodes.

    图 2  (a) CeRh2As2单晶在50 mK—0.6 K温区、不同磁场(最高到7 T)下的电阻率, 超导临界温度Tc随磁场增强逐渐降低, 并在7 T时被完全压制; (b) 不同磁场下, 温度低于2 K时的电阻率, 黑色小箭头指向T0异常, 随磁场增大, 电阻率在前一组数据偏移量的基础上偏移–10 μΩ, 虚线箭头指示偏移方向; (c) 主图为磁场7 T、温度低于0.5 K时的电阻率, 黑色虚线为$ \rho={\rho}_{0}+{A}{{T}}^{{\alpha}} $的拟合曲线, 插图中黑色虚线为温度低于0.15 K时, $ \rho $与T2的线性拟合结果; (d) CeRh2As2超导相图, 黑色上三角和蓝色正方形分别表示电阻率测量的超导临界温度$ {{T}}_{{{\mathrm{c}}}}^{{{\mathrm{mid}}}} $与T0异常; 红色星形为交流磁化率测量结果, 数据来源于文献[10]

    Fig. 2.  (a) Resistivity of CeRh2As2 single crystal measured between 50 mK and 0.6 K under various magnetic fields (up to 7 T). The superconducting critical temperature Tc decreases monotonically with increasing field and is fully suppressed at 7 T. (b) Resistivity below 2 K under various magnetic fields. Black arrows mark the T0 anomaly. Each successive curve is vertically offset by -10 μΩ relative to previous one, with dashed arrow indicating the offset direction. (c) Main panel: Resistivity at 7 T below 0.5 K. The black dashed curve represents the fit to $ \rho={\rho}_{0}+{A}{{T}}^{{\alpha}} $. Inset: Linear fit (black dashed line) to $ \rho({T}) $vs. T2 under 0.15 K; (d) Superconducting phase diagram of CeRh2As2. Black upward triangles and blue squares denote the $ {{T}}_{{{\mathrm{c}}}}^{{{\mathrm{mid}}}} $ and T0 anomaly from resistivity measurements, respectively. Red stars are from AC magnetic susceptibility data reproduced from Ref.[10].

    图 3  (a) 零场CeRh2As2单晶热导率的温度依赖, 黑色箭头指向超导临界温度Tc, 高于Tc和低于0.57Tc的拟合曲线分别为绿色和紫色, 并以虚线向更低温区延伸; (b) 加场(最高到7 T)下CeRh2As2单晶的极低温热导率, 黑色虚线为正常态Wiedemann-Franz定律的预期值$ {{L}}_{0}{/}{\rho}_{0}{(7 \;{\mathrm{T}})} $; (c)左轴为几种典型超导体的归一化剩余线性项κ0/T对归一化磁场强度H/Hc2的依赖关系, 右轴为CeRh2As2单晶在T = 0.15 K时κ/T的磁场依赖关系(红色方形)

    Fig. 3.  (a) Temperature dependence of the zero-field thermal conductivity of CeRh2As2 single crystal, with the black arrow indicating the superconducting critical temperature Tc. The fitting curves above Tc and below 0.57Tc are green and purple, respectively, and are extended to lower temperatures with dashed lines. (b) Low-temperature thermal conductivity of CeRh2As2 single crystal under applied fields (up to 7 T), with the black dashed line representing the normal-state Wiedemann-Franz law expectation $ {{L}}_{0}{/}{\rho}_{0}{(7 \; {\mathrm{T}})} $. (c) Left axis: Magnetic field dependence of the normalized residual linear term κ0/T versus normalized magnetic field strength H/Hc2 for several typical superconductors; Right axis: Magnetic field dependence of κ/T for the CeRh2As2 single crystal at T = 0.15 K (red squares).

  • [1]

    Norman M R 2011 Science 332 196Google Scholar

    [2]

    李宇, 盛玉韬, 杨义峰 2021 物理学报 70 017402Google Scholar

    Li Y, Sheng Y T, Yang Y F 2021 Acta. Phys. Sin. 70 017402Google Scholar

    [3]

    Steglich F, Aarts J, Bredl C D, Lieke W, Meschede D, Franz W, Schafer H 1979 Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 1892Google Scholar

    [4]

    Smidman M, Stockert O, Nica E M, Liu Y, Yuan H Q, Si Q M, Steglich F 2023 Rev. Mod. Phys. 95 031002Google Scholar

    [5]

    Grosche F, Julian S, Mathur N, Lonzarich G 1996 Physica B 223 50Google Scholar

    [6]

    Araki S, Nakashima M, Settai R, Kobayashi T C, Onuki Y 2002 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14 L377Google Scholar

    [7]

    Yuan H Q, Grosche F M, Deppe M, Geibel C, Sparn G, Steglich F 2003 Science 302 2104Google Scholar

    [8]

    Grosche F, Walker I, Julian S, Mathur N, Freye D, Steiner M, Lonzarich G 2001 J. Phys. Condens. Matter 13 2845Google Scholar

    [9]

    谢武, 沈斌, 张勇军, 郭春煜, 许嘉诚, 路欣, 袁辉球 2019 物理学报 68 177101Google Scholar

    Xie W, Shen B, Zhang Y J, Guo C Y, Xu J C, Lu X, Yuan H Q 2019 Acta. Phys. Sin. 68 177101Google Scholar

    [10]

    Khim S, Landaeta J F, Banda J, Bannor N, Brando M, Brydon P M R, Hafner D, Küchler R, Cardoso-Gil R, Stockert U, Mackenzie A P, Agterberg D F, Geibel C, Hassinger E 2021 Science 373 1012Google Scholar

    [11]

    Chajewski G, Kaczorowski D 2024 Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 076504Google Scholar

    [12]

    Hafner D, Khanenko P, Eljaouhari E O, Küchler R, Banda J, Bannor N, Lühmann T, Landaeta J F, Mishra S, Sheikin I, Hassinger E, Khim S, Geibel C, Zwicknagl G, Brando M 2022 Phys. Rev. X 12 011023

    [13]

    Khim S, Stockert O, Brando M, Geibel C, Baines C, Hicken T J, Luetkens H, Das D, Shiroka T, Guguchia Z, Scheuermann R 2025 Phys. Rev. B 111 115134Google Scholar

    [14]

    Schmidt B, Thalmeier P 2024 Phys. Rev. B 110 075154Google Scholar

    [15]

    Steppke A, Küchler R, Lausberg S, Lengyel E, Steinke L, Borth R, Lühmann T, Krellner C, Nicklas M, Geibel C 2013 Science 339 933Google Scholar

    [16]

    Movshovich R, Jaime M, Thompson J D, Petrovic C, Fisk Z, Pagliuso P G, Sarrao J L 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 5152Google Scholar

    [17]

    Metz T, Bae S, Ran S, Liu I L, Eo Y S, Fuhrman W T, Agterberg D F, Anlage S M, Butch N P, Paglione J 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 220504Google Scholar

    [18]

    Villegas H A V 2013 Ph. D. Dissertation (Dresden: Dresden University of Technology

    [19]

    Chajewski G, Szymanski D, Daszkiewicz M, Kaczorowski D 2024 Mater. Horiz. 11 855Google Scholar

    [20]

    Onishi S, Stockert U, Khim S, Banda J, Brando M, Hassinger E 2022 Front. Electron. Mater 2 880579Google Scholar

    [21]

    Khanenko P, Hafner D, Semeniuk K, Banda J, Lühmann T, Bärtl F, Kotte T, Wosnitza J, Zwicknagl G, Geibel C, Landaeta J F, Khim S, Hassinger E, Brando M 2025 Phys. Rev. B 111 045162Google Scholar

    [22]

    Mishra S, Liu Y, Bauer E D, Ronning F, Thomas S M 2022 Phys. Rev. B 106 L140502Google Scholar

    [23]

    Hamann S, Zhang J, Jang D, Hannaske A, Steinke L, Lausberg S, Pedrero L, Klingner C, Baenitz M, Steglich F, Krellner C, Geibel C, Brando M 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 077202Google Scholar

    [24]

    Gruner T, Jang D, Huesges Z, Cardoso-Gil R, Fecher G H, Koza M M, Stockert O, Mackenzie A P, Brando M, Geibel C 2017 Nat. Phys. 13 967Google Scholar

    [25]

    Wu Y, Zhang Y J, Ju S L, Hu Y, Huang Y E, Zhang Y N, Zhang H L, Zheng H, Yang G W, Eljaouhari E O, Song B P, Plumb N C, Steglich F, Shi M, Zwicknagl G, Cao C, Yuan H Q, Liu Y 2024 Chin. Phys. Lett. 41 097403Google Scholar

    [26]

    Chen T, Siddiquee H, Xu Q Z, Rehfuss Z, Gao S Y, Lygouras C, Drouin J, Morano V, Avers K E, Schmitt C J, Podlesnyak A, Paglione J, Ran S, Song Y, Broholm C 2024 Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 266505Google Scholar

    [27]

    Weng Z F, Smidman M, Jiao L, Lu X, Yuan H Q 2016 Rep. Prog. Phys. 79 094503Google Scholar

    [28]

    Doniach S 1977 Physica B+C 91 231Google Scholar

    [29]

    Coleman P, Schofield A J 2005 Nature 433 226Google Scholar

    [30]

    Li S Y, Bonnemaison J B, Payeur A, Fournier P, Wang C H, Chen X H, Taillefer L 2008 Phys. Rev. B 77 134501Google Scholar

    [31]

    Sutherland M, Hawthorn D G, Hill R W, Ronning F, Wakimoto S, Zhang H, Proust C, Boaknin E, Lupien C, Taillefer L, Liang R, Bonn D A, Hardy W N, Gagnon R, Hussey N E, Kimura T, Nohara M, Takagi H 2003 Phys. Rev. B 67 174520Google Scholar

    [32]

    Cohn J L, Skelton E F, Wolf S A, Liu J Z, Shelton R N 1992 Phys. Rev. B 45 13144Google Scholar

    [33]

    Yu R C, Salamon M B, Lu J P, Lee W C 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 1431Google Scholar

    [34]

    Landaeta J F, León A M, Zwickel S, Lühmann T, Brando M, Geibel C, Eljaouhari E O, Rosner H, Zwicknagl G, Hassinger E, Khim S 2022 Phys. Rev. B 106 014506

    [35]

    Lowell J, Sousa J B 1970 J. Low Temp. Phys. 3 65Google Scholar

    [36]

    Willis J O, Ginsberg D M 1976 Phys. Rev. B 14 1916Google Scholar

    [37]

    Boaknin E, Tanatar M A, Paglione J, Hawthorn D, Ronning F, Hill R W, Sutherland M, Taillefer L, Sonier J, Hayden S M, Brill J W 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 117003Google Scholar

    [38]

    Proust C, Boaknin E, Hill R W, Taillefer L, Mackenzie A P 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 147003Google Scholar

  • [1] 朱少平. 等离子体中激光能量沉积系数、电子热传导系数和电阻率的统一推导. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20250340
    [2] 李鸿明, 董闯, 王清, 李晓娜, 赵亚军, 周大雨. 电阻率与强度性能的关联及铜合金性能分区. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181498
    [3] 李青, 汪旻祥, 刘通, 穆青隔, 任治安, 李世燕. 准一维Cr基超导体RbCr3As3的超导能隙. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181692
    [4] 伍友成, 刘高旻, 戴文峰, 高志鹏, 贺红亮, 郝世荣, 邓建军. 冲击波作用下Pb(Zr0.95Ti0.05)O3铁电陶瓷去极化后电阻率动态特性. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.66.047201
    [5] 李蕊, 左小伟, 王恩刚. 时效Ag-7wt.%Cu合金的微观组织、电阻率和硬度. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.66.027401
    [6] 孙丽俊, 代飞, 罗江山, 易勇, 杨蒙生, 张继成, 黎军, 雷海乐. 铝纳米晶的低温导电特性研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.65.137303
    [7] 刘雅洁. 直接利用磁场和温度精确确定磁性材料La0.67Ca0.33MnO3和Pr0.7Sr0.3MnO3的电阻率. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.62.017601
    [8] 谌岩, 刘琳, 刘建华, 张瑞军. 高压处理对Cu75.15Al24.85合金组织与电阻率的影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.61.176103
    [9] 罗晓东, 狄国庆. 溅射制备Ge,Nb共掺杂窄光学带隙和低电阻率的TiO2薄膜. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.61.206803
    [10] 张治国. 紫外波段高透过率铜铟掺杂SnO2薄膜的研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.59.8172
    [11] 张明晓, 田学雷, 郭风祥. 电磁感应式液固态金属电阻率定性测量装置及应用. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.58.6080
    [12] 樊飞, 班春燕, 王洋, 巴启先, 崔建忠. 普通铸造和低频电磁铸造7050铝合金电阻率-温度特性的研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.58.638
    [13] 别少伟, 江建军, 马 强, 杜 刚, 袁 林, 邸永江, 冯则坤, 何华辉. 高电阻率多层纳米颗粒膜软磁特性及微波磁导率. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.57.2514
    [14] 翟秋亚, 杨 扬, 徐锦锋, 郭学锋. 快速凝固Cu-Sn亚包晶合金的电阻率及力学性能. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.56.6118
    [15] 汪 渊, 徐可为. Cu-W薄膜表面形貌的分形表征与电阻率. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.53.900
    [16] 龙云泽, 陈兆甲, 张志明, 万梅香, 郑 萍, 王楠林, 贺朝会, 耿 斌, 杨海亮, 陈晓华, 王燕萍, 李国政. 纳米管结构聚苯胺的电阻率和磁化率. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.52.175
    [17] 杨宏顺, 李鹏程, 柴一晟, 余旻, 李志权, 杨东升, 章良, 王喻宏, 李明德, 曹烈兆, 龙云泽, 陈兆甲. La2CuO4掺锌样品的低温电阻率与热导率研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.51.679
    [18] 王强, 陆坤权, 李言祥. 液态InSb电阻率和热电势与温度的关系. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.50.1355
    [19] 李慧玲, 阮可青, 李世燕, 莫维勤, 樊荣, 罗习刚, 陈仙辉, 曹烈兆. MgB2和Mg0.93Li0.07B2的电阻率与霍尔效应研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.50.2044
    [20] 杨宏顺, 余旻, 李世燕, 李鹏程, 柴一晟, 章良, 陈仙辉, 曹烈兆. 新型超导体MgB2的热电势和电阻率研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.50.1197
计量
  • 文章访问数:  209
  • PDF下载量:  10
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-03-26
  • 修回日期:  2025-04-10
  • 上网日期:  2025-04-24

/

返回文章
返回