-
重子非轻子衰变研究中一个悬而未决的问题是描述该类衰变的s波振幅与p波振幅的理论值不能同时与实验值很好的符合。与以往的文献相比,本文将采用协变的手征有效理论框架,在扩展极小减除(extendedminimal subtraction,EMS)方案下计算该类衰变的s波、p波振幅的一圈图修正。为与实验数据相比,分别采用s波拟合和p波拟合两种途径获得协变理论预言值。采用s波拟合得到s波协变振幅理论预言值略逊于重重子框架下的理论预言值,但是由此得到p波协变振幅理论预言值较重重子框架下的理论预言值有较多改善;采用p波拟合得到p波协变振幅理论预言值贴近实验值,重重子框架下的理论预言值与实验值相差较大,由此得到s波协变振幅理论预言值与实验值有明显差距,但重重子框架下的理论预言值与实验值差距更大。由此可见,协变框架下一圈图完整计算中,s波振幅与p波振幅间的理论矛盾依然存在,但是两者之间矛盾程度与重重子相比得到部分缓解。One unresolved issue in the study of baryon non-leptonic decays is that the theoretical values describing the s- and p-wave amplitudes of such decays cannot simultaneously agree well with experimental values. Compared with previous literature, this paper adopts the covariant chiral effective theory framework and calculates the one-loop corrections to the s- and p-wave amplitudes using the extended minimal subtraction (EMS) scheme, and also takes into account the contributions from intermediate pion states that were neglected in previous studies (the contributions from intermediate decuplet states are not considered here). Unlike infrared regularization and the extended on-shell subtraction scheme, EMS is simpler to implement and avoids over-subtraction. Apart from the typical chiral logarithmic terms mslnms obtained in heavy-baryon formalism, the covariant calculation retains many non-local contributions that are not negligible. These non-local contributions vary with loop diagrams and intermediate states, making the complete covariant results significantly different from the simple chiral logarithmic structures in heavy-baryon formalism, which may alleviate the tension between the s- and p-wave components of the decay amplitudes. Subsequent numerical analysis confirms this conjecture. Two approaches are adopted to obtain covariant theoretical predictions: s-wave fitting and p-wave fitting. According to the fitted predictions and chi-squares of fitness, the s-wave fitting yields s-wave predictions slightly inferior to that in heavy-baryon formalism, but the resulting p-wave predictions are considerably improved compared with the heavy-baryon ones. The p-wave fitting produces p-wave predictions closer to experimental values, while the heavy-baryon predictions differ significantly from the experimental values. The resulting s-wave predictions from p-wave fitting show noticeable discrepancies with experimental data, but the heavy-baryon predictions are even worse. Therefore, working in the covariant framework, the tension between s- and p-wave amplitudes for baryon non-leptonic decays is significantly alleviated in comparison with that bason on heavy-baryon formalism. In addition, it is found that the contributions from intermediate pion states may be neglected in many cases, but are important and must be kept for decays with smaller experimental values.
-
Keywords:
- Chiral effective field theory /
- baryon nonleptonic decays /
- extended minimal subtraction (EMS)
-
[1] Bijnens J, Sonoda H, Wise M B 1985 Nucl. Phys. B 261185.
[2] Jenkins E 1992 Nucl. Phys. B 375561.
[3] Borasoy B, Müller G 2000 Phys. Rev. D 62054020.
[4] Żenczykowski P 2006 Phys. Rev. D 73076005.
[5] Le Yaouanc A, Pène O, Raynal J C, Oliver L 1979 Nucl. Phys. B 149321.
[6] Nardulli G 1988 Nuov. Cim. A 100485.
[7] Scadron M D, Thebaud L R 1973 Phys. Rev. D 82329.
[8] Borasoy B, Holstein B R 1999 Eur. Phys. J. C 685.
[9] Borasoy B, Marco E 2003 Phys. Rev. D 67114016.
[10] Abd El-Hady A, Tandean J 2000 Phys. Rev. D 61114014.
[11] Becher T, Leutwyler H 1999 Eur. Phys. J. C 9647.
[12] Fuchs T, Gegelia J, Japaridze G, Scherer S 2003 Phys. Rev. D 68056055.
[13] Geng L S, Martín Cámalich J, Vicente Vacas M J 2009 Phys. Lett. B 67663.
[14] Yang J F 2014 Mod. Phys. Lett. A 291450043.
[15] Liu Z, Wen L H, Yang J F 2021 Nucl. Phys. B 963115288.
[16] Fettes N, Meissner U, Steininger S 1998 Nucl. Phys. A 640109.
[17] Holmberg M, Leupold S 2018 Eur. Phys. J. A 54103.
[18] Copeland P M, Ji C R, Melnitchouk W 2021 Phys. Rev. D 103044019.
[19] Jenkins E 1992 Nucl. Phys. B 36190.
[20] Liu Z, Yang J F 2022 Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science) 04103(in Chinese) [刘舟,杨继锋2022华东师范大学学报(自然科学版) 04103]
[21] Zhou H F, Yang J F 2024 Journal of East China Normal University(Natural Science) 0312(in Chinese) [周海峰,杨继锋2024华东师范大学学报(自然科学版) 0312]
[22] Salone N 2024 Nuov. Cim. 47C 201.
[23] Martín Cámalich J, Geng L S, Vacas M J V 2021 Phys. Rev. D 82074504.
[24] Gell-Mann M 1961 Cal Tech Rept. CTSL-20.
[25] Okubo S 1962 Prog. Theo. Phys. 27949.
计量
- 文章访问数: 16
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0