搜索

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

融合Kolmogorov-Arnold表示理论的锂离子电池健康状态预测网络

赵雪彤 董哲康 周豪杰 林辉品 纪晓悦

引用本文:
Citation:

融合Kolmogorov-Arnold表示理论的锂离子电池健康状态预测网络

赵雪彤, 董哲康, 周豪杰, 林辉品, 纪晓悦

A Lithium-Ion Battery State-of-Health Prediction Network Integrating Kolmogorov–Arnold Representation Theory

ZHAO Xuetong, DONG Zhekang, ZHOU Haojie, LIN Huipin, JI Xiaoyue
Article Text (iFLYTEK Translation)
PDF
导出引用
在线预览
  • 电动汽车锂离子电池健康状态(State of Health,SOH)的精准预测对行车安全与电池管理系统优化具有重要意义。然而,现有方法普遍面临两大挑战:其一,依赖大量健康特征导致信息冗余与计算复杂度过高;其二,SOH时间序列的强非线性与非平稳性使传统神经网络易出现预测漂移和趋势震荡。基于此,本文提出一种融合Kolmogorov–Arnold(KAN)表示理论的混合神经网络—KanFormer,用于高精度SOH预测。该网络由局部特征提取、全局特征提取与预测输出三大模块构成:局部特征提取模块利用KAN的平滑插值能力有效捕捉细粒度信息,全局特征提取模块结合Transformer的复杂关系建模能力实现跨时间尺度的信息整合,预测输出模块借助KAN的非线性拟合优势生成精准预测结果。该模型一方面有效缓解了数据非线性与非平稳性导致的漂移与震荡问题,另一方面实现了平均15.32%的训练速度提升。在Michigan Formation、HNEI、NASA三个公开电池老化数据集上的验证结果表明,KanFormer在均方误差(MSE) ,平均绝对误差(MAE)和决定系数(R2)上分别达到了0.0045、0.041、0.978(Michigan数据集)与0.00055、0.0175、0.996(HNEI数据集) ,显著优于现有主流方法,充分说明其在SOH预测中的高准确性和强泛化能力。
    Accurate prediction of the state of health (SOH) of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles is crucial for ensuring the safety of drivers and passengers, optimizing battery management systems (BMS), and extending battery life. Reliable SOH prediction underpins essential BMS functions, including charge–discharge control, remaining useful life (RUL) prediction, and fault diagnosis. However, existing data-driven methods still face two long-standing challenges. First, most models rely excessively on a large number of handcrafted health features derived from voltage, current, and capacity data, resulting in feature redundancy and low computational efficiency. Second, SOH-related time series exhibit strong nonlinearity and non-stationarity, causing traditional neural networks to suffer from prediction drift, instability, and performance degradation under varying conditions. To address the first challenge, we propose a lightweight health feature selection mechanism that combines incremental capacity analysis (ICA) with correlation analysis to automatically identify compact and physically meaningful degradation features. Only four key health features that are highly correlated with capacity fading are selected, which effectively reduces model complexity and computational cost while maintaining high SOH prediction accuracy. To overcome the second challenge, we develop a hybrid neural network model (KanFormer) integrating the Kolmogorov–Arnold (KAN) representation theory with a Transformer-based temporal modeling framework for accurate and robust SOH prediction. Specifically, the proposed KanFormer framework consists of three hierarchical modules: (1) the local feature extraction module, which leverages the smooth interpolation capability of KAN to capture fine-grained degradation characteristics from voltage–capacity and incremental capacity (IC) curves, modeling local nonlinear behaviors in the degradation process; (2) the global feature extraction module, which employs a multi-head Transformer encoder to learn long-range dependencies and cross-scale temporal relationships, enabling the joint modeling of short-term dynamics and long-term aging evolution; and (3) the prediction output module, which uses nonlinear KAN layers to adaptively fuse local and global representations, producing numerically stable and highly accurate SOH prediction results. By combining the mathematical expressiveness of KAN with the temporal reasoning capability of the Transformer, KanFormer effectively mitigates prediction drift and oscillations induced by data nonlinearity and non-stationarity. Compared with conventional deep-learning models, the proposed method improves training efficiency by 15.32%. Experimental validation on three publicly available battery-aging datasets—Michigan Formation, HNEI, and NASA—demonstrates its superior performance, achieving MSE = 0.0045, MAE = 0.041, R2 = 0.978 on the Michigan dataset, MSE = 0.00055, MAE = 0.0175, R2 = 0.996 on the HNEI dataset, and MSE = 0.0056, MAE = 0.017, R2 = 0.984 on the NASA dataset. These results substantially outperform mainstream baselines, confirming the high accuracy and robustness of KanFormer. In summary, KanFormer unifies lightweight feature selection, nonlinear functional representation, and cross-scale temporal modeling, providing a scalable and interpretable solution for high-accuracy and high-efficiency SOH prediction.
  • [1]

    Gao M Y, Cai L H, Sun C C 2022 J. Electron. Inf. Technol. 44 3734 (in Chinese) [高明裕,蔡林辉,孙长城 2022 电子与信息学报 44 3734]

    [2]

    Dong Z K, Ji X Y, Wang J Y, Gu Y T, Wang J F, Qi D L 2024 IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 70 4311

    [3]

    Lucaferri V, Quercio M, Laudani A, Riganti Fulginei F 2023 Energies 16 7807

    [4]

    Zhang Y L, Dong Z Q, Zheng L F, Wang K, Liang J F 2025 Acta Phys. Sin. 74 148803 (in Chinese) [张艳岚, 董泽庆, 郑利锋, 王凯, 梁君飞 2025 物理学报 74 148803]

    [5]

    Li X J, Yu Y T, Zhang Z W, Dong X R 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 11401 (in Chinese) [李晓杰, 喻云泰, 张志文, 董小瑞. 2021 物理学报 71 11401]

    [6]

    Fahmy H M, Hasanien H M, Alharbi M, Ji H 2025 Sci. Rep. 15 14592

    [7]

    Lai X, Yi W, Cui Y F, Qin C, Han X B, Sun T, Zhou L, Zheng Y J 2021 Energy. 216 119233

    [8]

    Xiong R, Li L L, Li Z R, Yu Q Q, Mu H 2018 Appl. Energy 219 264

    [9]

    Amir S, Gulzar M, Tarar M O, Naqvi I H, Zaffar N A, Pecht M G 2022 IEEE Access 10 18279

    [10]

    Dong Z K, Gu S Y, Zhou S Q, Yang M J, Lai C S, Gao M Y 2025 IEEE Trans. Transp. Electr. 11 3655

    [11]

    Dong Z K, Yang M J, Wang J F, Wang H, Lai C S, Ji X Y 2025 IEEE Trans. Transp. Electr. 11 2696

    [12]

    Zhang M, Yang D F, Du J X, Sun H L, Li L W, Wang L C, Wang K 2023 Energies 16 3167

    [13]

    Zhou D, Liang J L, Li F X, Cui Y X, Shan Y X, Zhang Y H, Chen M H, Li S 2024 J. Energy Storage 104 114579

    [14]

    Huang J, He T, Zhu W L, Liao Y X, Zeng J H, Xu Q, Niu Y C 2025 Comput. Electr. Eng. 122 109930

    [15]

    Zhang Y H, Li Z Y, Kong L Y, Xu H, Shen H W, Chen M 2025 J. Energy Storage 105 114538

    [16]

    Qian C, Xu B H, Xia Q, Ren Y, Sun B, Wang Z L 2023 Appl. Energy 336 120793

    [17]

    Zheng K, Meng J H, Yang Z P, Zhou F F, Yang K, Song Z X 2024 Appl. Energy 375 124077

    [18]

    Li Y, Tao J 2020 Proceedings of the Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC) Hefei, China, August 22–24, 2020 pp 5489–5494

    [19]

    Zhang C L, Luo L J, Yang Z, Zhao S S, He Y G, Wang X, Wang H X 2023 Green Energy Intell. Transp. 2 100108

    [20]

    Chen K Q, Pang H, Lin G Y, Wang F B, Nan W Z, Du J R 2024 Proceedings of the IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo, Asia-Pacific (ITEC Asia-Pacific) Chengdu, China, August 28–31, 2024 pp 423–428

    [21]

    Ren L, Dong J B, Wang X K, Meng Z H, Zhao L, Deen M J 2021 IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 17 3478

    [22]

    Gu X Y, See K W, Li P H, Shan K H, Wang Y P, Zhao L, Lim K C, Zhang N 2023 Energy 262 125501

    [23]

    Li Z Y, Zhang X W, Gao W 2024 Energy 311 133418

    [24]

    Liu W, Xu Y 2019 Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2) Beijing, China, November 8–10, 2019 pp 1203–1208

    [25]

    Braco E, San Martin I, Sanchis P, Ursua A, Stroe D I 2022 J. Energy Storage 55 105366

    [26]

    Ji X Y, Chen Y, Wang J F, Zhou G D, Lai C S, Dong Z K 2024 IEEE Internet Things J. 11 41941

    [27]

    Chen X, Qin Y W, Zhao W D, Yang Q M, Cai N B, Wu K 2024 J. Energy Storage 86 111197

    [28]

    Zhou W L, Lu Q, Zheng Y P 2022 Machines 10 512

    [29]

    Krupp A, Ferg E, Schuldt F, Derendorf K, Agert C 2021 Batteries 7 2

    [30]

    Weng A, Mohtat P, Attia P, Less G, Lee S, Stefanopoulou A 2021 Battery test data – fast formation study University of Michigan – Deep Blue Data https://doi.org/10.7302/pa3f-4w30

    [31]

    Dubarry M, Beck D 2021 HNEI Long-Term Degradation Dataset Battery Archive https://batteryarchive.org

    [32]

    Bodner A D, Tepsich A S, Spolski J N, Pourteau S 2024 arXiv preprint 2406.13155

  • [1] 张凯, 徐鹏, 关学锋, 杜玉群, 王轲杰, 陆勇俊. 力学约束对锂离子电池双层电极中锂扩散和应力的影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20241275
    [2] 柳小伟, 宋辉, 郭美卿, 王根伟, 迟青卓. 基于电化学-应力耦合模型的锂离子电池硅/碳核壳结构的模拟与优化. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210455
    [3] 李涛, 程夕明, 胡晨华. 锂离子电池电化学降阶模型性能对比. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201894
    [4] 彭劼扬, 王家海, 沈斌, 李浩亮, 孙昊明. 纳米颗粒的表面效应和电极颗粒间挤压作用对锂离子电池电压迟滞的影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182302
    [5] 曾建邦, 郭雪莹, 刘立超, 沈祖英, 单丰武, 罗玉峰. 基于电化学-热耦合模型研究隔膜孔隙结构对锂离子电池性能的影响机制. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20181726
    [6] 庞辉. 基于扩展单粒子模型的锂离子电池参数识别策略. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172171
    [7] 庞辉. 基于电化学模型的锂离子电池多尺度建模及其简化方法. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.66.238801
    [8] 黄亮, 李建远. 基于单粒子模型与偏微分方程的锂离子电池建模与故障监测. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.64.108202
    [9] 马昊, 刘磊, 路雪森, 刘素平, 师建英. 锂离子电池正极材料Li2FeSiO4的电子结构与输运特性. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.64.248201
    [10] 李娟, 汝强, 孙大伟, 张贝贝, 胡社军, 侯贤华. 锂离子电池SnSb/MCMB核壳结构负极材料嵌锂性能研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.62.098201
    [11] 黄乐旭, 陈远富, 李萍剑, 黄然, 贺加瑞, 王泽高, 郝昕, 刘竞博, 张万里, 李言荣. 氧化石墨制备温度对石墨烯结构及其锂离子电池性能的影响. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.61.156103
    [12] 彭薇, 岳敏, 梁奇, 胡社军, 侯贤华. 锂离子电池LiMn1-xFexPO4(0x<1)正极材料的制备及性能研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.60.038202
    [13] 白莹, 王蓓, 张伟风. 熔融盐法合成锂离子电池正极材料纳米LiNiO2. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.60.068202
    [14] 张弦, 王宏力. 具有选择与遗忘机制的极端学习机在时间序列预测中的应用. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.60.080504
    [15] 张弦, 王宏力. 基于Cholesky分解的增量式RELM及其在时间序列预测中的应用. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.60.110201
    [16] 侯贤华, 余洪文, 胡社军. 锂离子电池Sn-Al薄膜电极的制备及电化学性能研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.59.8226
    [17] 侯贤华, 胡社军, 石璐. 锂离子电池Sn-Ti合金负极材料的制备及性能研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.59.2109
    [18] 丁 刚, 钟诗胜. 基于时变阈值过程神经网络的太阳黑子数预测. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1224
    [19] 任 韧, 徐 进, 朱世华. 最小二乘支持向量域的混沌时间序列预测. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.55.555
    [20] 侯柱锋, 刘慧英, 朱梓忠, 黄美纯, 杨 勇. 锂离子电池负极材料CuSn的Li嵌入性质的研究. 物理学报, doi: 10.7498/aps.52.952
计量
  • 文章访问数:  8
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 上网日期:  2025-11-12

/

返回文章
返回