Measurement of radioactive residual nuclides induced in Cu target by 80.5 MeV/u carbon ions

Zhou Bin; Yu Quan-Zhi; Zhang Hong-Bin; Zhang Xue-Ying; Ju Yong-Qin; Chen Liang; Ruan Xi-Chao

doi:10.7498/aps.70.20201503

Abstract

Radioactive residual nuclides, which are usually closely related to radiation protection and personnel safety, will be generated when target materials are irradiated by high energy particles. Based on different nuclear reaction models, Monte Carlo code is a usual method to obtain residual nuclide production. The simulation accuracy needs to be evaluated by experimental data. In this paper, an irradiation experiment of thin copper target irradiated by ¹²C⁶⁺ particles with energy of 80.5 MeV/u is carried out. The radioactivities and cross-sections of 18 radioactive residual nuclides are obtained by gamma spectrometry analysis. Compared with the Monte Carlo simulation by PHITS, the results show that the spallation model of PHITS has a high reliability in estimating the types of radioactive residual nuclei, and it could be optimized in the aspect of the absolute yield.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

1.
Spallation Neutron Source Science Center, Dongguan 523803, China
2.
Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
3.
Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
4.
China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 102413, China
5.
Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan 523808, China

Corresponding author: Yu Quan-Zhi, qzhyu@iphy.ac.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11575289) and CAS Key Technology Talent Program

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Xia J W, Zhan W L, Wei B W, et al. 2002 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 488 11 Google Scholar
[2]	Wei J, Chen H S, Chen Y W, et al. 2009 Nucl. Instumr. Methods Phys. Res., A 600 10 Google Scholar
[3]	朱升云, 郭刚, 何明, 吴振东, 袁大庆, 隋丽, 焦学胜, 常宏伟, 左义, 范平, 葛智刚, 陈东风 2020 原子能科学技术 54 1 Google Scholar Zhu S Y, Guo G, He M, Wu Z D, Ruan D Q, Sui L, Jiao X S, Chang H W, Zuo Y, Fan P, Ge Z G, Chen D F 2020 Atom. Ener. Sci. Technol. 54 1 Google Scholar
[4]	刘世耀 2012 质子和重离子治疗及其装置 (北京: 科学出版社) 第152页 Liu S Y 2012 Proton and Heavy Ions Therapy and Facility (Beijing: Science Press) p152 (in Chinses)
[5]	Villagrasa-Cabton C, Boudard A, Ducret J E, et al. 2007 Phys. Rev. C 75 044603 Google Scholar
[6]	林源根, 詹文龙, 郭忠言, 等 1998 物理学报 47 564 Google Scholar Lin Y G, Zhan W L, Guo Z Y, et al. 1998 Acta Phys. Sin. 47 564 Google Scholar
[7]	Roger E B, Daniel R M, Glenn T S 1951 Phys. Rev. 84 671 Google Scholar
[8]	Cumming J B, Haustein P E, Stoenner R W 1974 Phys. Rev. C 10 739 Google Scholar
[9]	Cumming J B, Stoenner R W 1976 Phys. Rev. C 14 1554 Google Scholar
[10]	Cumming J B, Haustein P E, Ruth T J, Virtes G J 1978 Phys. Rev. C 17 1632 Google Scholar
[11]	Porile N T, Cole G D, Rudy C R 1979 Phys. Rev. C 19 2288 Google Scholar
[12]	Hicks K H, Ward T E, Bowman H, et al. 1982 Phys. Rev. C 26 2016 Google Scholar
[13]	Whitfield J P, Porile N T, 1993 Phys. Rev. C 47 1636 Google Scholar
[14]	Michel R, Gloris M, Lange H J, et al. 1995 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 103 183 Google Scholar
[15]	Michel R, Bodemann R, Busemann H, et al. 1997 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 129 153 Google Scholar
[16]	Titarenko Y E, Shvedov O V, Igumnov M M, et al. 1998 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 414 73 Google Scholar
[17]	Titarenko Y E, Shvedov O V, Batyaev V F, et al. 2002 Phys.Rev.C 65 064610 Google Scholar
[18]	Yashima H, Uwamino Y, Sugita H, et al. 2002 Phys.Rev.C 66 044607 Google Scholar
[19]	Yashima H, Uwamino Y, Iwase H, et al. 2004 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 226 243 Google Scholar
[20]	Shams A M, Uosif M A, Michel R, et al. 2013 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 298 19 Google Scholar
[21]	Ogawa T, Morev M N, Sato T, Hashimoto S ???? Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 300 35
[22]	Ge H L, Ma F, Zhang X Y, et al. 2014 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 337 34 Google Scholar
[23]	Zhang H B, Zhang X Y, Ma F, et al. 2015 Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 042501 Google Scholar
[24]	Tatsuhiko S, Koji N, Norihiro M, et al. 2013 J Nucl. Sci. Technol. 50 913 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 铜靶冷却后的伽玛能谱

Figure 1. Gamma spectra of the copper target.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 放射性剩余核分析流程图

Figure 2. Diagram to analyze radioactive residual nuclei.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

表 1 长半衰期放射性剩余核的测量活度值

Table 1. Radioactivity of long-life residual nuclides

剩余核名称	半衰期/d	T = 11.8 d/Bq	T = 6.8 d/Bq	推导值/Bq	T = 3.8 d/Bq	推导值/Bq
⁵¹Cr	27.7	1526.2	1695.1	1729.6	1831.9	1864.5
⁴⁸V	15.97	1107.9	1351.0	1376.4	1512.9	1567.8
⁵²Mn	5.59	934.9	1690.1	1737.9	2437.4	2521.0
⁵⁸Co	70.82	876.1	893.5	920.0	949.7	947.5
⁵⁶Co	77.27	239.1	233.5	250.1	233.6	256.9
^{44 m}Sc	2.44	228.9	907.4	536.4	2105.5	2218.0
⁵⁷Co	271.79	211.3	209.4	214.0	216.5	215.7
⁴⁶Sc	83.79	169.7	179.9	176.9	174.9	181.3
⁴⁷Sc	3.345	155.2	433.7	437.4	799.6	814.4
⁵⁴Mn	312.3	140.7	139.8	142.3	139.2	143.2
⁵⁹Fe	44.5	58.1	55.6	60.9	65.1	65.8

DownLoad: CSV

表 2 剩余核实验测量与模拟活度值(冷却时间3.8 d)

Table 2. Radioactivity of residual nuclides in copper target by measurement and PHITS simulation (cooling for 3.8 d).

剩余核名称	半衰期	模拟活度值/Bq	实测活度值/Bq	Exp./Cal.
⁴⁷Sc	3.345d	2832.3	799.6 ± 29.9	0.28
⁵¹Cr	27.7d	1953.0	1831.9 ± 68.5	0.94
⁴⁴Sc	2.927h	1920.0	4507.8 ± 288.6	2.47
⁴⁸V	15.97d	1642.2	1512.9 ± 110.1	0.86
^44mSc	58.6h	1813.3	2105.5 ± 78.8	1.22
⁴⁸Sc	43.67h	1416.6	152.0 ± 13.2	0.11
⁵²Mn	5.59d	1106.3	2437.4 ± 111.7	2.20
⁵⁸Co	70.82d	915.5	949.7 ± 43.5	1.04
⁷Be	53.29d	776.7	186.3 ± 12.9	0.24
⁴³K	22.3h	598.6	143.3 ± 5.4	0.24
³²P	14.26d	490.4	纯β衰变	—
⁵⁷Ni	35.6h	486.5	203.2 ± 13.5	0.42
⁴⁶Sc	83.79d	408.7	174.9 ± 9.6	0.43
³³P	14.26d	327.8	纯β衰变	—
⁴⁷Ca	4.536d	233.2	特征峰微弱	—
⁵⁷Co	271.79d	214.4	216.5 ± 8.1	1.01
⁵⁶Co	77.27d	213.3	233.6 ± 15.5	1.09
³⁷Ar	35.04d	208.6	纯β衰变	—
⁵⁴Mn	312.3d	199.6	139.2 ± 6.4	0.70
⁴²K	12.36h	176.3	特征峰微弱	—
⁴⁹V	330d	163.5	纯β衰变	—
³H	12.33a	130.3	纯β衰变
⁵⁵Co	17.53h	116.4	133.1 ± 13.8	1.14
⁵⁹Fe	44.5d	109.4	61.8 ± 5.8	0.56
⁴⁸Cr	21.56h	93.5	47.5 ± 1.8	0.51

DownLoad: CSV

表 3 铜靶放射性剩余产物的反应截面

Table 3. Cross sections of residual nuclides in copper target by measurement and PHITS simulation.

剩余核名称	测量截面值/mb	模拟截面值/mb
⁷Be	9.11 ± 0.98	38.0
⁴³K	2.05 ± 0.19	8.6
^{44 m}Sc	13.37 ± 1.21	10.9
⁴⁶Sc	13.21 ± 1.31	30.9
⁴⁷Sc	5.10 ± 0.46	18.1
⁴⁸Sc	1.04 ± 0.13	9.7
⁴⁸V	24.93 ± 2.75	28.5
⁴⁸Cr	0.72 ± 0.07	1.4
⁵¹Cr	48.78 ± 4.41	48.0
⁵²Mn	19.16 ± 1.81	8.7
⁵⁴Mn	38.28 ± 3.61	38.3
⁵⁵Co	3.26 ± 0.43	2.9
⁵⁶Co	16.31 ± 1.72	14.9
⁵⁷Co	51.88 ± 4.69	51.4
⁵⁸Co	60.97 ± 5.76	58.8
⁵⁷Ni	1.59 ± 0.17	3.8
⁵⁹Fe	2.55 ± 0.32	4.5

DownLoad: CSV

[1]	Xia J W, Zhan W L, Wei B W, et al. 2002 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 488 11 Google Scholar
[2]	Wei J, Chen H S, Chen Y W, et al. 2009 Nucl. Instumr. Methods Phys. Res., A 600 10 Google Scholar
[3]	朱升云, 郭刚, 何明, 吴振东, 袁大庆, 隋丽, 焦学胜, 常宏伟, 左义, 范平, 葛智刚, 陈东风 2020 原子能科学技术 54 1 Google Scholar Zhu S Y, Guo G, He M, Wu Z D, Ruan D Q, Sui L, Jiao X S, Chang H W, Zuo Y, Fan P, Ge Z G, Chen D F 2020 Atom. Ener. Sci. Technol. 54 1 Google Scholar
[4]	刘世耀 2012 质子和重离子治疗及其装置 (北京: 科学出版社) 第152页 Liu S Y 2012 Proton and Heavy Ions Therapy and Facility (Beijing: Science Press) p152 (in Chinses)
[5]	Villagrasa-Cabton C, Boudard A, Ducret J E, et al. 2007 Phys. Rev. C 75 044603 Google Scholar
[6]	林源根, 詹文龙, 郭忠言, 等 1998 物理学报 47 564 Google Scholar Lin Y G, Zhan W L, Guo Z Y, et al. 1998 Acta Phys. Sin. 47 564 Google Scholar
[7]	Roger E B, Daniel R M, Glenn T S 1951 Phys. Rev. 84 671 Google Scholar
[8]	Cumming J B, Haustein P E, Stoenner R W 1974 Phys. Rev. C 10 739 Google Scholar
[9]	Cumming J B, Stoenner R W 1976 Phys. Rev. C 14 1554 Google Scholar
[10]	Cumming J B, Haustein P E, Ruth T J, Virtes G J 1978 Phys. Rev. C 17 1632 Google Scholar
[11]	Porile N T, Cole G D, Rudy C R 1979 Phys. Rev. C 19 2288 Google Scholar
[12]	Hicks K H, Ward T E, Bowman H, et al. 1982 Phys. Rev. C 26 2016 Google Scholar
[13]	Whitfield J P, Porile N T, 1993 Phys. Rev. C 47 1636 Google Scholar
[14]	Michel R, Gloris M, Lange H J, et al. 1995 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 103 183 Google Scholar
[15]	Michel R, Bodemann R, Busemann H, et al. 1997 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 129 153 Google Scholar
[16]	Titarenko Y E, Shvedov O V, Igumnov M M, et al. 1998 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 414 73 Google Scholar
[17]	Titarenko Y E, Shvedov O V, Batyaev V F, et al. 2002 Phys.Rev.C 65 064610 Google Scholar
[18]	Yashima H, Uwamino Y, Sugita H, et al. 2002 Phys.Rev.C 66 044607 Google Scholar
[19]	Yashima H, Uwamino Y, Iwase H, et al. 2004 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 226 243 Google Scholar
[20]	Shams A M, Uosif M A, Michel R, et al. 2013 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 298 19 Google Scholar
[21]	Ogawa T, Morev M N, Sato T, Hashimoto S ???? Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 300 35
[22]	Ge H L, Ma F, Zhang X Y, et al. 2014 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 337 34 Google Scholar
[23]	Zhang H B, Zhang X Y, Ma F, et al. 2015 Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 042501 Google Scholar
[24]	Tatsuhiko S, Koji N, Norihiro M, et al. 2013 J Nucl. Sci. Technol. 50 913 Google Scholar

[1]	Xun Zhi-Peng, Hao Da-Peng. Monte Carlo simulation of bond percolation on square lattice with complex neighborhoods. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(6): 066401. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211757
[2]	Wang Li-Min, Duan Bing-Huang, Xu Xian-Guo, Li Hao, Chen Zhi-Jun, Yang Kun-Jie, Zhang Shuo. Simulation of neutron irradiation damage in lead lanthanum zirconate titanate by Monte Carlo method. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(7): 076101. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212041
[3]	Ren Jie, Ruan Xi-Chao, Chen Yong-Hao, Jiang Wei, Bao Jie, Luan Guang-Yuan, Zhang Qi-Wei, Huang Han-Xiong, Wang Zhao-Hui, An Qi, Bai Huai-Yong, Bao Yu, Cao Ping, Chen Hao-Lei, Chen Qi-Ping, Chen Yu-Kai, Chen Zhen, Cui Zeng-Qi, Fan Rui-Rui, Feng Chang-Qing, Gao Ke-Qing, Gu Min-Hao, Han Chang-Cai, Han Zi-Jie, He Guo-Zhu, He Yong-Cheng, Hong Yang, Huang Wei-Ling, Huang Xi-Ru, Ji Xiao-Lu, Ji Xu-Yang, Jiang Hao-Yu, Jiang Zhi-Jie, Jing Han-Tao, Kang Ling, Kang Ming-Tao, Li Bo, Li Chao, Li Jia-Wen, Li Lun, Li Qiang, Li Xiao, Li Yang, Liu Rong, Liu Shu-Bin, Liu Xing-Yan, Mu Qi-Li, Ning Chang-Jun, Qi Bin-Bin, Ren Zhi-Zhou, Song Ying-Peng, Song Zhao-Hui, Sun Hong, Sun Kang, Sun Xiao-Yang, Sun Zhi-Jia, Tan Zhi-Xin, Tang Hong-Qing, Tang Jing-Yu, Tang Xin-Yi, Tian Bin-Bin, Wang Li-Jiao, Wang Peng-Cheng, Wang Qi, Wang Tao-Feng, Wen Jie, Wen Zhong-Wei, Wu Qing-Biao, Wu Xiao-Guang, Wu Xuan, Xie Li-Kun, Yang Yi-Wei, Yi Han, Yu Li, Yu Tao, Yu Yong-Ji, Zhang Guo-Hui, Zhang Lin-Hao, Zhang Xian-Peng, Zhang Yu-Liang, Zhang Zhi-Yong, Zhao Yu-Bin, Zhou Lu-Ping, Zhou Zu-Ying, Zhu Dan-Yang, Zhu Ke-Jun, Zhu Peng. In-beam γ-rays of back-streaming white neutron source at China Spallation Neutron Source. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(17): 172901. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200718
[4]	Tian Zi-Ning, Ouyang Xiao-Ping, Chen Wei, Wang Xue-Mei, Deng Ning, Liu Wen-Biao, Tian Yan-Jie. Source boundary parameter of Monte Carlo inversion technology based on virtual source principle. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(23): 232901. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191095
[5]	Li Wen-Fang, Du Jin-Jin, Wen Rui-Juan, Yang Peng-Fei, Li Gang, Zhang Tian-Cai. Single-atom transfer in a strongly coupled cavity quantum electrodynamics: experiment and Monte Carlo simulation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(24): 244205. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.244205
[6]	Yang Yi-Wei, Yan Xiao-Song, Liu Rong, Lu Xin-Xin, Jiang Li, Wang Mei, Lin Ju-Fang. Measurements and analyses of uranium reaction rates on a depleted uranium shell with D-T neutrons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(2): 022801. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.022801
[7]	Hua Yu-Chao, Dong Yuan, Cao Bing-Yang. Monte Carlo simulation of phonon ballistic diffusive heat conduction in silicon nanofilm. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(24): 244401. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.244401
[8]	Xiao Yuan, Wang Xiao-Fang, Teng Jian, Chen Xiao-Hu, Chen Yuan, Hong Wei. Simulation study of radiography using laser-produced electron beam. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(23): 234102. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.234102
[9]	Lan Mu, Xiang Gang, Gu Gang-Xu, Zhang Xi. A Monte Carlo simulation study on growth mechanism of horizontal nanowires on crystal surface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(22): 228101. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.228101
[10]	Fan Xiao-Hui, Zhao Xing-Yu, Wang Li-Na, Zhang Li-Li, Zhou Heng-Wei, Zhang Jin-Lu, Huang Yi-Neng. Monte Carlo simulations of the relaxation dynamics of the spatial relaxation modes in the molecule-string model. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(12): 126401. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.126401
[11]	Chen Shan, Wu Qing-Yun, Chen Zhi-Gao, Xu Gui-Gui, Huang Zhi-Gao. Ferromagnetism of C doped ZnO: first-principles calculation and Monte Carlo simulation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(3): 2011-2017. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.2011
[12]	Xiong Kai-Guo, Feng Guo-Lin, Hu Jing-Guo, Wan Shi-Quan, Yang Jie. Monte Carlo simulation of the record-breaking high temperature events of climate changes. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(4): 2843-2852. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.2843
[13]	Gao Fei, Ryoko Yamada, Mitsuo Watanabe, Liu Hua-Feng. Use of Monte Carlo simulations for the scatter events analysis of PET scanners. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(5): 3584-3591. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.3584
[14]	Xu Lan-Qing, Li Hui, Xiao Zheng-Ying. Discussion on backscattered photon numbers and their scattering events in a turbid media. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(9): 6030-6035. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.6030
[15]	Lei Xiao-Wei, Zheng Bo, Ying He-Ping. A numerical study on the aging of two-dimensional spin systems. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(3): 1713-1718. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1713
[16]	He Qing-Fang, Xu Zheng, Liu De-Ang, Xu Xu-Rong. Monte Carlo simulation of the effect of impact ionization in thin-film electroluminescent devices. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(4): 1997-2002. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.1997
[17]	Wang Shi-Qi, Lian Gui-Jun, Xiong Guang-Cheng. Electronic transport properties and simulation of random resistor network in granular mixture system of La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 and CeO 2. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(8): 3815-3821. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.3815
[18]	Wang Zhi-Jun, Dong Li-Fang, Shang Yong. Monte Carlo simulation of optical emission spectra in electron assisted chemical vapor deposition of diamond. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(2): 880-885. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.880
[19]	Wang Jian-Hua, Jin Chuan-En. Application of Monte Carlo simulation to the research of ions transport plasma sheaths of glow discharge. Acta Physica Sinica, 2004, 53(4): 1116-1122. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.1116
[20]	Guo Zeng-Bao. . Acta Physica Sinica, 2002, 51(10): 2344-2348. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.2344

Catalog

Vol. 70, Issue 7 - 2021-04-05

Metrics

Abstract views: 6326
PDF Downloads: 227
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板