-
Since the discovery of symmetric helical interactions in the spin-orbit coupled single-band Hubbard model by Moriya and Kaplan, Shekhtman, Entin, Aharony et al. have successfully used this non-negligible symmetric helical exchange interaction to explain the weak ferromagnetism of La2CuO4. By using the non-Markovian quantum state diffusion method, the quantum discord of non-Markovian dynamics in the spin chain system that has Kaplan–Shekhtman–Entin-Wohlman–Aharony interactions and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions is studied. The effects of Kaplan–Shekhtman–Entin-Wohlman–Aharony interaction on the quantum discord under different external magnetic fields at zero and finite temperatures are discussed. The results show that the quantum discord in the system can be increased via the increasing of Kaplan–Shekhtman–Entin-Wohlman–Aharony interaction in the case of zero or uniform magnetic field, while the case is opposite under the nonuniform magnetic field. More importantly, the ideal discord state can be obtained by modulating the uniform magnetic field and Kaplan–Shekhtman–Entin-Wohlman–Aharony interaction. Moreover, the Markovian case and the effect of temperature on the quantum discord are also discussed, respectively.
-
Keywords:
- non-markovian quantum state diffusion method /
- quantum discord /
- magnetic field /
- Kaplan-Shekhtman-entin-Wohlman-Aharony interaction
[1] Huang Y 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 54410
Google Scholar
[2] Dakić B, Lipp Y O, Ma X, Ringbauer M, Kropatschek S, Barz S, Paterek T, Vedral V, Zeilinger A, Brukner Č, Walther P 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 666
Google Scholar
[3] Shahandeh F, Lund A P, Ralph T C 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 052303
Google Scholar
[4] Ringbauer M, Costa F, Goggin M E, Andrew G W, Fedrizzi A 2018 NPJ Quantum Inf. 4 1
Google Scholar
[5] Ecker S, Bouchard F, Bulla L, Brandt F, Kohout O, Steinlechner F, Fickler R, Malik M, Guryanova Y, Ursin R, Huber M 2019 Phys. Rev. X 9 041042
Google Scholar
[6] Braun D, Adesso G, Benatti F, Floreanini R, Marzolino U, Mitchell M W, Pirandola S 2018 Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 035006
Google Scholar
[7] Wootters W K 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 2245
Google Scholar
[8] Mamtimin T, Ahmad A, Rabigul M 2013 Chin. Phys. Lett. 30 030303
Google Scholar
[9] Harold O, Zurek W H 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 017901
Google Scholar
[10] Ali M, Rau A, Alber G. 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 82
Google Scholar
[11] Fanchini F F, Werlang T, Brasil C A 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 52107
Google Scholar
[12] Daki B, Lipp Y O, Ma X, Ringbauer M, Kropatschek S, Barz S, Paterek T, Vedral V, Zeilinger V, Brukner Č 2012 Nature Physics 8 666
[13] Seri A, Lenhard A, Rieländer D, Gündoǧan M, Ledingham P M, Mazzera M, Riedmatten H D 2017 Phys. Rev. X 7 021028
Google Scholar
[14] Burkard G, Loss D, Divincenzo D P 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 2070
Google Scholar
[15] Vrijen R, Yablonovitch E, Wang K, Hong W J, Balandin A, Roychowdhury V, Mor T, Vincenzo D D 2000 Phys. Rev. A 62 12306
Google Scholar
[16] Kane B E 1998 Nature 393 133
Google Scholar
[17] Pourkarimi M R 2018 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57 1158
Google Scholar
[18] Sun Y, Ma X, Guo J 2020 Quantum Inf. Process. 19 1
Google Scholar
[19] Moriya T 1960 Phys. Rev. Lett. 4 228
Google Scholar
[20] Kaplan T A 1983 Z. Phys. B:Condens. Matter 49 313
Google Scholar
[21] Shekhtman L, Wohlman E, Aharony A 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 836
Google Scholar
[22] Shekhtman L, Aharony A, Wohlman O E 1993 Phys. Rev. B 47 174
Google Scholar
[23] Tsukada I, Takeya J, Masuda T, Uchinokura K 2000 Phys. Rev. B 62 R6061
Google Scholar
[24] Zheludev A, Maslov S, Shirane G, Tsukada I, Uchinokura K, Zaliznyak I, Erwin I, Regnault L P 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 11432
Google Scholar
[25] Zheludev A, Maslov S, Tsukada I, Zaliznyak I, Regnault L P, Masuda T, Uchinokura K, Erwin R, Shirane G 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 5410
Google Scholar
[26] Yurischev M A 2020 Quantum Information Processing 19 1
[27] Rabboul A, Khalil E M, Khalek S A, Barataky A A, Zinadah H A 2021 IEEE Access 9 51325
Google Scholar
[28] Liu T, Ren J, Tong P Q 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 184426
Google Scholar
[29] Diósi L, Gisin N, Strunz W T 1998 Phys. Rev. A 58 1699
Google Scholar
[30] Li P B, Zhou Y, Gao W B, Nori F 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 153602
Google Scholar
[31] Hosokawa K, Shiokawa K, Otsuka Y, Nakajima A, Ogawa T, Kelly J D 2006 Geophys. Res. Lett. 33 L15111
Google Scholar
[32] Zhao X Y 2014 Ph. D. Dissertation (Hoboken: Stevens Institute of Technology)
[33] Yu T 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 062107
Google Scholar
-
图 1 (a)量子失协随KSEA相互作用和时间的演化特性; (b) KSEA相互作用在
$\omega t = 5$ 时对量子失协的影响. 其他参数${J_x} = 0.2,~ {J_y} = 0.5,~ {J_z} = 0.9, ~\gamma = 0.1,~ {B_z} = 0,~ {b_z} = 0$ ,${D_z} = 0.2,~T = 0$ Figure 1. (a) Dynamics of quantum discord with KSEA interactions and time; (b) effect of KSEA interaction on quantum discord at
$\omega t = 5$ . The other parameters are${J_x} = 0.2,~ {J_y} = 0.5,~ {J_z} = 0.9,~ \gamma = 0.1,~ {B_z} = 0, {b_z} = 0$ ,${D_z} = $ $ 0.2, T = 0$ .
图 2 KSEA相互作用在不同磁场环境下对量子失协的影响 (a)不加磁场
${B_{{z}}} = 0,~ {b_z} = 0$ ; (b)均匀磁场${B_{ {z}}} = 1, $ $ {b_z} = 0$ ; (c)非均匀磁场${B_{ {z}}} = 1, ~{b_z} = 3$ . 其他参数${J_x} = 0.2, $ $ {J_y} = 0.5,~ {J_z} = 0.9$ ,$\gamma = 0.1,~ {D_z} = 0.2, ~T = 0$ Figure 2. Effects of KSEA interactions on the dynamics of the quantum discord in different magnetic field environment: (a) No magnetic field added
${B_{\text{z}}} = 0,~ {b_z} = 0$ ; (b) uniform magnetic field${B_{\text{z}}} = 1,~ {b_z} = 0$ ; (c) non-uniform magnetic field${B_{\text{z}}} = 1, {b_z} = 3$ . The other parameters are${J_x} = 0.2, $ $ {J_y} = 0.5,~ {J_z} = 0.9$ ,$\gamma = 0.1,~{D_z} = 0.2,~ T = 0$ .
图 3 马尔科夫环境下均匀磁场中KSEA相互作用对量子失协的影响. 其他参数
${J_x} = 0.2,\; {J_y} = 0.5,\; {J_z} = 0.9$ ,$\gamma = $ $ 3, \; {B_z} = 2,\; {b_z} = 0, \;{D_z} = 0.2,\; T = 0$ .Figure 3. Effects of KSEA interactions on quantum discord in a uniform magnetic field in Markovian environment. The other parameters are
${J_x} = 0.2, \;{J_y} = 0.5,\; {J_z} = 0.9,\; \gamma = 3$ ,${B_z} = 2,\; {b_z} = 0,\; {D_z} = 0.2, \;T = 0$ .
图 4 (a)量子失协随时间和温度的演化特性; (b)温度在
$\omega t = 5$ 时对量子失协的影响. 其他参数${J_x} = 0.2, \;{J_y} = 0.5, $ $ {J_z} = 0.9$ ,$\gamma = 0.1,\; {B_z} = 1,\; {b_z} = 0,\; {D_z} = 0.2,\; {\varGamma _z} = 2$ Figure 4. (a) Dynamics of quantum discord with time t and temperature
$T$ ; (b) effect of temperature$T$ on quantum discord at$\omega t = 5$ . The other parameters are${J_x} = 0.2, \, {J_y} = $ $ 0.5, \,{J_z} = 0.9,\,\gamma = 0.1, \,{B_z} = 1, \,{b_z} = 0, \,{D_z} = 0.2$ ,${\varGamma _z} = 2$ -
[1] Huang Y 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 54410
Google Scholar
[2] Dakić B, Lipp Y O, Ma X, Ringbauer M, Kropatschek S, Barz S, Paterek T, Vedral V, Zeilinger A, Brukner Č, Walther P 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 666
Google Scholar
[3] Shahandeh F, Lund A P, Ralph T C 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 052303
Google Scholar
[4] Ringbauer M, Costa F, Goggin M E, Andrew G W, Fedrizzi A 2018 NPJ Quantum Inf. 4 1
Google Scholar
[5] Ecker S, Bouchard F, Bulla L, Brandt F, Kohout O, Steinlechner F, Fickler R, Malik M, Guryanova Y, Ursin R, Huber M 2019 Phys. Rev. X 9 041042
Google Scholar
[6] Braun D, Adesso G, Benatti F, Floreanini R, Marzolino U, Mitchell M W, Pirandola S 2018 Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 035006
Google Scholar
[7] Wootters W K 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 2245
Google Scholar
[8] Mamtimin T, Ahmad A, Rabigul M 2013 Chin. Phys. Lett. 30 030303
Google Scholar
[9] Harold O, Zurek W H 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 017901
Google Scholar
[10] Ali M, Rau A, Alber G. 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 82
Google Scholar
[11] Fanchini F F, Werlang T, Brasil C A 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 52107
Google Scholar
[12] Daki B, Lipp Y O, Ma X, Ringbauer M, Kropatschek S, Barz S, Paterek T, Vedral V, Zeilinger V, Brukner Č 2012 Nature Physics 8 666
[13] Seri A, Lenhard A, Rieländer D, Gündoǧan M, Ledingham P M, Mazzera M, Riedmatten H D 2017 Phys. Rev. X 7 021028
Google Scholar
[14] Burkard G, Loss D, Divincenzo D P 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 2070
Google Scholar
[15] Vrijen R, Yablonovitch E, Wang K, Hong W J, Balandin A, Roychowdhury V, Mor T, Vincenzo D D 2000 Phys. Rev. A 62 12306
Google Scholar
[16] Kane B E 1998 Nature 393 133
Google Scholar
[17] Pourkarimi M R 2018 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57 1158
Google Scholar
[18] Sun Y, Ma X, Guo J 2020 Quantum Inf. Process. 19 1
Google Scholar
[19] Moriya T 1960 Phys. Rev. Lett. 4 228
Google Scholar
[20] Kaplan T A 1983 Z. Phys. B:Condens. Matter 49 313
Google Scholar
[21] Shekhtman L, Wohlman E, Aharony A 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 836
Google Scholar
[22] Shekhtman L, Aharony A, Wohlman O E 1993 Phys. Rev. B 47 174
Google Scholar
[23] Tsukada I, Takeya J, Masuda T, Uchinokura K 2000 Phys. Rev. B 62 R6061
Google Scholar
[24] Zheludev A, Maslov S, Shirane G, Tsukada I, Uchinokura K, Zaliznyak I, Erwin I, Regnault L P 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 11432
Google Scholar
[25] Zheludev A, Maslov S, Tsukada I, Zaliznyak I, Regnault L P, Masuda T, Uchinokura K, Erwin R, Shirane G 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 5410
Google Scholar
[26] Yurischev M A 2020 Quantum Information Processing 19 1
[27] Rabboul A, Khalil E M, Khalek S A, Barataky A A, Zinadah H A 2021 IEEE Access 9 51325
Google Scholar
[28] Liu T, Ren J, Tong P Q 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 184426
Google Scholar
[29] Diósi L, Gisin N, Strunz W T 1998 Phys. Rev. A 58 1699
Google Scholar
[30] Li P B, Zhou Y, Gao W B, Nori F 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 153602
Google Scholar
[31] Hosokawa K, Shiokawa K, Otsuka Y, Nakajima A, Ogawa T, Kelly J D 2006 Geophys. Res. Lett. 33 L15111
Google Scholar
[32] Zhao X Y 2014 Ph. D. Dissertation (Hoboken: Stevens Institute of Technology)
[33] Yu T 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 062107
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 4465
- PDF Downloads: 76
- Cited By: 0
