-
Benefitting from the high measurement efficiency, off-axis digital holography (DH) has become a most powerful DH technique for fast and high-accuracy measurement. Owing to the carrier frequency, the real image can be isolated easily in the Fourier spectrum of one off-axis hologram, so that the Fourier transform algorithm (FTA) is the most widely used algorithm for off-axis DH to realize the phase retrieval. In the FTA, one of the most important tasks is to figure out the accurate peak position of the real image and then shift the real image to the center of spectrum to remove the carrier. However, owing to the digitalization of the hologram, the peak position of the real spectrum is always not located at an integral pixel position in the practical applications, resulting in carrier residuals, thereby lowering the retrieval quality. Much work on accurately determining the peak position has been conducted to suppress the carrier residuals, such as by using the spectrum centroid method and zero padding. However, those estimation algorithms can achieve only satisfied accuracy in some situations. Then, spatial carrier phase shift (SCPS) is utilized to expand the utilization of space-bandwidth and avoid the spectrum leakage caused by band-pass filtering. The SCPS decomposes one off-axis hologram into several sub-holograms, in which the carrier induces the phase shifts between sub-holograms. Many on-axis phase retrieval algorithms are combined with SCPS to retrieve the phase from one off-axis hologram. However, the retrieved phase is usually composed of the sample phase and the carrier, so the accurate carrier information is also required to remove the carrier and obtain the correct reconstructed phase. In this paper, an accurate phase retrieval with carrier removal from single off-axis hologram by using the linear regression is proposed to achieve the simultaneous phase retrieval and carrier removal. In this method, four phase-shifted sub-holograms are extracted first from one off-axis hologram by SCPS. Since the phase shift between sub-holograms is linearly proportional to the carrier, the linear regression can be combined with least-square method to retrieve the phase and carrier simultaneously. Both the simulation and experimental results show that the proposed method can determine the carrier accurately and obtain correct phase without carrier. We believe that this proposed method can be applied to practical measurement.
-
Keywords:
- off-axis digital holography /
- phase retrieval /
- carrier frequency /
- linear regression
[1] Popescu G, Ikeda T, Dasari R R, Feld M S 2006 Opt. Lett. 31 775Google Scholar
[2] Gao P, Harder I, Nercissian V, Mantel K, Yao B L 2010 Opt. Lett. 35 712Google Scholar
[3] Bai H Y, Shan M G, Zhong Z, Guo L L, Zhang Y B 2015 Appl. Opt. 54 9513Google Scholar
[4] Girshovitz P, Shaked N T 2013 Opt. Express 21 5701Google Scholar
[5] Mahajan S, Trivedi V, Vora P, Chhaniwal V, Javidi B, Anand A 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 3743Google Scholar
[6] Shaked N T, Micó V, Trusiak M, Kuś A, Mirsky S K 2020 Adv. Opt. Photonics 12 556Google Scholar
[7] Bai H Y, Shan M G, Zhong Z, Guo L L, Zhang Y B 2015 Opt. Laser Eng. 75 1
[8] Xia P, Wang Q H, Ri S 2020 Opt. Express 28 19988Google Scholar
[9] Sun P, Zhong L Y, Luo C S, Niu W H, Lu X X 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 12053Google Scholar
[10] Pham H V, Edwards C, Goddard L L, Popescu G 2013 Appl. Opt. 52 A97Google Scholar
[11] Girshovitz P, Shaked N T 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 2262Google Scholar
[12] Sha B, Liu X, Ge X L, Guo C S 2014 Opt. Express 22 23066Google Scholar
[13] Hao B G, Shan M G, Zhong Z, Diao M, Wang Y, Zhang Y B 2015 J. Opt. 17 035602Google Scholar
[14] Fan Q, Yang H R, Li G P, Zhao J L 2010 J. Opt. 12 115401Google Scholar
[15] Du Y Z, Feng G Y, LI H R, Zhou S H 2014 Optik 125 1056Google Scholar
[16] Hincapié-Zuluaga D, Herrera-Ramírez J, Garcia-Sucerquia J 2018 Optik 169 109Google Scholar
[17] Deng D N, Qu W J 2020 IEEE Photonics J. 12 1
[18] Bai H Y, Min R, Yang Z H 2019 Opt. Rev. 26 549Google Scholar
[19] Deng D N, Qu W J, He W Q, Wu Y, Liu X L, Peng X 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 5282Google Scholar
[20] Guo H W, Yang Q, Chen M Y 2007 Appl. Opt. 46 1057Google Scholar
[21] Styk A, Patorski K 2007 Appl. Opt. 46 4613Google Scholar
[22] Xu J H, Xu Q, Peng H S 2008 Appl. Opt. 47 5446Google Scholar
[23] Huang L B, Lu X X, Li J S, Zhou Y F, Xiong J X, Tian J D, Zhong L Y 2016 Opt. Express 24 13744Google Scholar
[24] Liu F W, Wu Y Q, Wu F, König N, Schmitt R, Wan Y J, Xu Y 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 148Google Scholar
[25] Wang Z, Han B 2004 Opt. Lett. 29 1671Google Scholar
[26] Liu Q, Wang Y, Ji F, He J 2013 Opt. Express 21 29505Google Scholar
[27] Zhong Z, Zhao H, Shan M G, Liu B, Lu W L, Zhang Y B 2020 Opt. Laser Eng. 127 105954Google Scholar
-
图 2 (a) 光程差100 nm相位型半球生成的离轴全息图; (b)—(f) 使用FTA, SCM, 10倍ZP, 20倍ZP, DEA和本算法的恢复结果
Figure 2. (a) Off-axis hologram of a phase hemisphere with 100 nm optical path difference; (b)–(f) retrieved phase maps by FTA, SCM, ZP with 10 times zero-padding, ZP with 20 times zero-padding, DEA and the proposed algorithm.
-
[1] Popescu G, Ikeda T, Dasari R R, Feld M S 2006 Opt. Lett. 31 775Google Scholar
[2] Gao P, Harder I, Nercissian V, Mantel K, Yao B L 2010 Opt. Lett. 35 712Google Scholar
[3] Bai H Y, Shan M G, Zhong Z, Guo L L, Zhang Y B 2015 Appl. Opt. 54 9513Google Scholar
[4] Girshovitz P, Shaked N T 2013 Opt. Express 21 5701Google Scholar
[5] Mahajan S, Trivedi V, Vora P, Chhaniwal V, Javidi B, Anand A 2015 Opt. Lett. 40 3743Google Scholar
[6] Shaked N T, Micó V, Trusiak M, Kuś A, Mirsky S K 2020 Adv. Opt. Photonics 12 556Google Scholar
[7] Bai H Y, Shan M G, Zhong Z, Guo L L, Zhang Y B 2015 Opt. Laser Eng. 75 1
[8] Xia P, Wang Q H, Ri S 2020 Opt. Express 28 19988Google Scholar
[9] Sun P, Zhong L Y, Luo C S, Niu W H, Lu X X 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 12053Google Scholar
[10] Pham H V, Edwards C, Goddard L L, Popescu G 2013 Appl. Opt. 52 A97Google Scholar
[11] Girshovitz P, Shaked N T 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 2262Google Scholar
[12] Sha B, Liu X, Ge X L, Guo C S 2014 Opt. Express 22 23066Google Scholar
[13] Hao B G, Shan M G, Zhong Z, Diao M, Wang Y, Zhang Y B 2015 J. Opt. 17 035602Google Scholar
[14] Fan Q, Yang H R, Li G P, Zhao J L 2010 J. Opt. 12 115401Google Scholar
[15] Du Y Z, Feng G Y, LI H R, Zhou S H 2014 Optik 125 1056Google Scholar
[16] Hincapié-Zuluaga D, Herrera-Ramírez J, Garcia-Sucerquia J 2018 Optik 169 109Google Scholar
[17] Deng D N, Qu W J 2020 IEEE Photonics J. 12 1
[18] Bai H Y, Min R, Yang Z H 2019 Opt. Rev. 26 549Google Scholar
[19] Deng D N, Qu W J, He W Q, Wu Y, Liu X L, Peng X 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 5282Google Scholar
[20] Guo H W, Yang Q, Chen M Y 2007 Appl. Opt. 46 1057Google Scholar
[21] Styk A, Patorski K 2007 Appl. Opt. 46 4613Google Scholar
[22] Xu J H, Xu Q, Peng H S 2008 Appl. Opt. 47 5446Google Scholar
[23] Huang L B, Lu X X, Li J S, Zhou Y F, Xiong J X, Tian J D, Zhong L Y 2016 Opt. Express 24 13744Google Scholar
[24] Liu F W, Wu Y Q, Wu F, König N, Schmitt R, Wan Y J, Xu Y 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 148Google Scholar
[25] Wang Z, Han B 2004 Opt. Lett. 29 1671Google Scholar
[26] Liu Q, Wang Y, Ji F, He J 2013 Opt. Express 21 29505Google Scholar
[27] Zhong Z, Zhao H, Shan M G, Liu B, Lu W L, Zhang Y B 2020 Opt. Laser Eng. 127 105954Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 4987
- PDF Downloads: 102
- Cited By: 0