Overview of applications of heralded single photon source in quantum key distribution

Meng Jie; Xu Le-Chen; Zhang Cheng-Jun; Zhang Chun-Hui; Wang Qin

doi:10.7498/aps.71.20220344

Abstract

In this paper, we mainly introduce the preparation and physical properties of the heralded single-photon source, the development history and its applications in three typical quantum key distribution protocols, including BB84, measurement-device-independent and twin-field quantum key distribution protocols. Moreover, we make comparisons of the above quantum key distribution protocols between using heralded single-photon source and using weak coherent sources, and analyze their advantages and disadvantages. Besides, according to the characteristics of single-photon interference in twin-field quantum key distributions, the limitations of separately applying heralded single-photon sources to twin-field quantum key distributions are revealed, and possible solutions are discussed. Therefore, this work may provide valuable references and help for the practical implementation of quantum secure communication in the near future.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

1.
Institute of Quantum Information and Technology, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Broadband Wireless Communication and Sensor Network of Ministry of Education, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China

Corresponding author: Wang Qin, qinw@njupt.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant Nos. 2018YFA0306400, 2017YFA0304100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12074194, 12104240), and the Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation, China (Grant Nos. BK20192001, BK20210582).

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Bennett C H, Brassard G 1984 Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing (Bangalore: IEEE) p175
[2]	Ekert A K 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 661 Google Scholar
[3]	Bennett C H, Brassard G, Mermin N D 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 557 Google Scholar
[4]	Bennett C H 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 3121 Google Scholar
[5]	Scarani V, Acín A, Ribordy G, Gisin N 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 057901 Google Scholar
[6]	Inoue K, Waks E, Yamamoto Y 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 037902 Google Scholar
[7]	Bruß D 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 3018 Google Scholar
[8]	Brassard G, Lütkenhaus N, Mor T, Sanders BC 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 1330 Google Scholar
[9]	Lütkenhaus N, Jahma M 2002 New J. Phys. 4 44 Google Scholar
[10]	Makarov V, Hjelme D R 2005 J. Mod. Opt. 52 691 Google Scholar
[11]	Qi B, Fung C H F, Lo H K, Ma X F 2007 Quantum Inf. Comput. 7 73 Google Scholar
[12]	Zhao Y, Fung C H F, Qi B, Chen C, Lo H K 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 042333 Google Scholar
[13]	Lydersen L, Wiechers C, Wittmann C, Elser D, Skaar J, Makarov V 2010 Nat. Photonics 4 686 Google Scholar
[14]	Gerhardt I, Liu Q, Lamas-Linares A, Skaar J, Kurtsiefer C, Makarov V 2011 Nat. Commun. 2 1 Google Scholar
[15]	Weier H, Krauss H, Rau M, Fürst M, Nauerth S, Weinfurter H 2011 New J. Phys. 13 073024 Google Scholar
[16]	Wiechers C, Lydersen L, Wittmann C, Elser D, Skaar J, Marquardt Ch, Makarov V, Leuchs G 2011 New J. Phys. 13 013043 Google Scholar
[17]	Hwang W Y 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 057901 Google Scholar
[18]	Wang X B 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230503 Google Scholar
[19]	Lo H K, Ma X, Chen K 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230504 Google Scholar
[20]	Braunstein S L, Pirandola S 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 130502 Google Scholar
[21]	Lo H K, Curty M, Qi B 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 130503 Google Scholar
[22]	Silva T F, Vitoreti D, Xavier G B, do Amaral G C, Temporão G T, von derWeid J P 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 052303 Google Scholar
[23]	Liu Y, Chen T Y, Wang L J, Pan J W 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 130502 Google Scholar
[24]	Rubenok A, Slater J A, Chan P, Lucio-Martinez I, Tittel W 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 130501 Google Scholar
[25]	Pirandola S, Laurenza, Ottaviani C, Banchi L 2017 Nature Commun. 8 15043 Google Scholar
[26]	Lucamarini M, Yuan Z L, Dynes J F, Shields A J 2018 Nature 557 400 Google Scholar
[27]	Ma X, Zeng P, Zhou H 2018 Phys. Rev. X 8 031043 Google Scholar
[28]	Wang X B, Yu Z W, Hu X L 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 062323 Google Scholar
[29]	Cui C H, Zhen Y Q, Wang R, Chen W, Wang S, Guo G C 2019 Phys. Rev. Appl. 11 034053 Google Scholar
[30]	Curty M, Azuma K, Lo H K 2019 Npj Quantum Inf. 5 1 Google Scholar
[31]	Lin J, Lütkenhaus N 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 042332 Google Scholar
[32]	Wang S, He D Y, Yin Z Q, Lu F Y, Cui C H, Chen W, Zhou Z, Guo G C, Han Z F 2019 Phys. Rev. X 9 021046 Google Scholar
[33]	Liu Y, Yu Z W, Zhang W, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 100505 Google Scholar
[34]	Zhong X, Hu J, Curty M, Qian L, Lo H K 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 100506 Google Scholar
[35]	Pittaluga M, Minder M, Lucamarini M, Sanzaro M, Shields A J 2021 Nat. Photon. 15 530 Google Scholar
[36]	Wang S, Yin Z Q, He D Y, Chen W, Wang R Q, Ye P, Zhou Y, Yuan-Fan G J, Wang F X, Chen W, Zhu Y G, Morozov P V, Divochiy A V, Zhou Z, Guo G C, Han Z F 2022 Nat. Photon. 16 154 Google Scholar
[37]	Wang Q, Chen W, Xavier G, Swillo M, Zhang T, Sauge S, Tengner M, Han Z F, Guo G C, Karlsson A 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 090501 Google Scholar
[38]	Zhang C H, Wang D, Zhou X Y, Wang S, Zhang L B, Yin Z Q, Chen W, Han Z H, Guo G C, Wang Q 2018 Opt. Express 26 25921 Google Scholar
[39]	朱峰, 王琴 2014 光学学报 6 0627002 Google Scholar Zhu F, Wang Q 2014 Acta Opt. Sin. 6 0627002 Google Scholar
[40]	王东 2017 博士学位论文 (合肥: 中国科学技术大学) Wang D 2017 Ph. D. Dissertation (Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China) (in Chinese)
[41]	张春辉 2020 博士学位论文 (南京: 南京邮电大学) Zhang C H 2020 Ph. D. Dissertation (Nanjing: nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications)
[42]	Wang Q, Karlsson A 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 014309 Google Scholar
[43]	Bock M, Lenhard A, Chunnilall C, Becher C 2016 Opt. Express 24 23992 Google Scholar
[44]	Aboussouan P, Alibart O, Ostrowsky D B, Baldi P, Tanzilli S 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 021801 Google Scholar
[45]	Kaneda F, Garay-Palmett K, U’Ren A B, Kwiat P G 2016 Opt. Express 24 10733 Google Scholar
[46]	Weston M M, Chrzanowski H M, Wollmann S, Boston A, Ho J, Shalm L K, Verma V B, Allman M S, Nam S W, Patel R B, Slussarenko S, Pryde G J 2016 Opt. Express 24 10869 Google Scholar
[47]	Zhong H S, Li Y, Li W, et al. 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 250505 Google Scholar
[48]	Sansa Perna A, Ortega E, Gräfe M, Steinlechner F 2022 Appl. Phys. Lett. 120 074001 Google Scholar
[49]	Gottesman D, Lo H K, Lütkenhaus N, Preskill J 2004 Quantum Inf. Comput. 5 325 Google Scholar
[50]	Wang Q, Wang X B, Guo G C 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 012312 Google Scholar
[51]	Adachi Y, Yamamoto T, Koashi M, Imoto N 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 180503 Google Scholar
[52]	Wang Q, Zhang C H, Wang X B 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 032312 Google Scholar
[53]	Ma X, Qi B, Zhao Y, Lo H K 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 012326 Google Scholar
[54]	Zhang C H, Luo S L, Guo G C, Wang Q 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 022332 Google Scholar
[55]	Wang Q, Wang X B 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 052332 Google Scholar
[56]	Zhang C H, Zhang C M, Guo G C, Wang Q 2018 Opt. Express 26 4219 Google Scholar
[57]	Zhou Y H, Yu Z W, Wang X B 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 042324 Google Scholar
[58]	Xu F, Xu H, Lo H K 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 052333 Google Scholar
[59]	Zhang C H, Zhang C M, Wang Q 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 052325 Google Scholar
[60]	Hu X L, Yu Z W, Wang X B 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 032303 Google Scholar
[61]	Abruzzo S, Kampermann H, Bruß D 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 012301 Google Scholar
[62]	Panayi C, Razavi M, Ma X, Lütkenhaus N 2014 New J. Phys. 16 043005 Google Scholar
[63]	Kaneda F, Xu F, Chapman J, Kwiat P G 2017 Optica 4 1034 Google Scholar
[64]	Xu H, Hu X L, Feng X L, Wang X B 2020 Opt. Lett. 45 4120 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 HSPS制备原理示意图^[40]

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the setup for HSPS generation^[40].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 WCS光源与HSPS光源光子数分布概率对比^[41]

Figure 2. Comparison of photon number distribution probabilities between WCS and HSPS^[41].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 基于HSPS和基于WCS的BB84协议成码率对比^[50]

Figure 3. Comparison of the key rate between using HSPS and WCS^[50].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 基于HSPS的三强度诱骗态QKD实验装置示意图^[37]

Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the setup for three-intensity decoy state QKD based on HSPS^[37].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 基于HSPS的三强度诱骗态QKD实验与理论对比^[37]

Figure 5. Comparisons between experiment and theory for the three-intensity decoy state QKD based on HSPS^[37].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 基于HSPS的新型被动式诱骗态QKD方案示意图^[52]

Figure 6. Schematic diagram of the new passive decoy state QKD protocol based on HSPS^[52].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 7 最终密钥生成率比较^[52]　(a) 对数尺度下的密钥生成率; (b) 密钥生成率的相对值

Figure 7. The comparison of the final key generation rate^[52]: (a) Absolute values of the key generation rate with logarithm scale; (b) relative value for the key generation rate.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 8 新型被动式诱骗态实验装置示意图^[38]

Figure 8. Schematic diagram of the passive decoy state QKD setup^[38].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 9 基于HSPS光源的MDI-QKD原理示意图^[55]

Figure 9. Schematic diagram of the principle of MDI-QKD based on HSPS light source^[55].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 10 基于不同光源情况的诱骗态MDI-QKD协议的成码率仿真对比^[55]　(a) 密钥率对比; (b) 信号光强度对比

Figure 10. Comparison between MDI-QKD protocols based on different light sources^[55]: (a) Comparisons of the key rate; (b) comparisons of the signal intensity.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 11 改进的被动式诱骗态 MDI-QKD仿真^[57]

Figure 11. Simulation of new passive decoy state MDI-QKD^[57]

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 12 TF-QKD协议的实验结构示意图^[26]

Figure 12. Schematic diagram of the TF-QKD protocol^[26].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

表 1 WCS与HSPS光源光子数分布概率对比^[41]

Table 1. Comparison of photon number distribution probabilities between WCS and HSPS^[41].

光源	$ {\mathit{P}}_{0} $	$ {\mathit{P}}_{1} $	$ {\mathit{P}}_{\mathit{m}} $
$ \mathrm{W}\mathrm{C}\mathrm{S} $	$ 6.065\times 1{0}^{-1} $	$ 0.3033 $	$ 0.0902 $
$ \mathrm{H}\mathrm{S}\mathrm{P}\mathrm{S} $	$ 6.065\times 1{0}^{-7} $	$ 0.2274 $	$ 0.0853 $

DownLoad: CSV

表 2 不同HSPS实现方案关键指标对比

Table 2. Comparison of core parameters of different HSPS schemes.

晶体类型	信号光中心谱线/nm	滤波片半高宽/nm	纯度/%	光源亮度	标记效率滤波前/%/后/%	参考文献
PPLN	1557	0.10	78.0	1.40×10³ pairs·(s·μW)^–1	39.9 / 64.0	Saarlandes2016 [43]
PPLN	1536	0.25	99.0	1.60×10³ pairs·(s·mW)^–1	—	Nice2010 [44]
PPKTP	1590	0.00	90.0	1.10×10⁴ pairs·(s·mW)^–1	77.0 / 0	Illinois2016 [45]
PPKTP	1570	8.00	98.0	3.29×10² pairs·(s·μW)^–1	52.0 / 0	Griffith2016 [46]
BBO	1550	10.00	99.7	1.70×10² pairs·(s·mW)^–1	91.0 / 94.0	USTC2018 [47]
BBO	532	24.00	—	9.50×10³ pairs·(s·mW)^–1	18.9 / 16.7	Fraunhofer2022 [48]
注: 晶体类型为自发参量下转换过程中使用的非线晶体; PPLN: periodically-poled potassium titanyl phosphate, 周期极化磷酸钛钾晶体; PPKTP: periodically-poled potassium titanyl phosphate, 周期极化磷酸钛钾晶体; BBO: β–barium-borate, 偏硼磷钡晶体.

DownLoad: CSV

[1]	Bennett C H, Brassard G 1984 Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing (Bangalore: IEEE) p175
[2]	Ekert A K 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 661 Google Scholar
[3]	Bennett C H, Brassard G, Mermin N D 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 557 Google Scholar
[4]	Bennett C H 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 3121 Google Scholar
[5]	Scarani V, Acín A, Ribordy G, Gisin N 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 057901 Google Scholar
[6]	Inoue K, Waks E, Yamamoto Y 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 037902 Google Scholar
[7]	Bruß D 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 3018 Google Scholar
[8]	Brassard G, Lütkenhaus N, Mor T, Sanders BC 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 1330 Google Scholar
[9]	Lütkenhaus N, Jahma M 2002 New J. Phys. 4 44 Google Scholar
[10]	Makarov V, Hjelme D R 2005 J. Mod. Opt. 52 691 Google Scholar
[11]	Qi B, Fung C H F, Lo H K, Ma X F 2007 Quantum Inf. Comput. 7 73 Google Scholar
[12]	Zhao Y, Fung C H F, Qi B, Chen C, Lo H K 2008 Phys. Rev. A 78 042333 Google Scholar
[13]	Lydersen L, Wiechers C, Wittmann C, Elser D, Skaar J, Makarov V 2010 Nat. Photonics 4 686 Google Scholar
[14]	Gerhardt I, Liu Q, Lamas-Linares A, Skaar J, Kurtsiefer C, Makarov V 2011 Nat. Commun. 2 1 Google Scholar
[15]	Weier H, Krauss H, Rau M, Fürst M, Nauerth S, Weinfurter H 2011 New J. Phys. 13 073024 Google Scholar
[16]	Wiechers C, Lydersen L, Wittmann C, Elser D, Skaar J, Marquardt Ch, Makarov V, Leuchs G 2011 New J. Phys. 13 013043 Google Scholar
[17]	Hwang W Y 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 057901 Google Scholar
[18]	Wang X B 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230503 Google Scholar
[19]	Lo H K, Ma X, Chen K 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 230504 Google Scholar
[20]	Braunstein S L, Pirandola S 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 130502 Google Scholar
[21]	Lo H K, Curty M, Qi B 2012 Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 130503 Google Scholar
[22]	Silva T F, Vitoreti D, Xavier G B, do Amaral G C, Temporão G T, von derWeid J P 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 052303 Google Scholar
[23]	Liu Y, Chen T Y, Wang L J, Pan J W 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 130502 Google Scholar
[24]	Rubenok A, Slater J A, Chan P, Lucio-Martinez I, Tittel W 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 130501 Google Scholar
[25]	Pirandola S, Laurenza, Ottaviani C, Banchi L 2017 Nature Commun. 8 15043 Google Scholar
[26]	Lucamarini M, Yuan Z L, Dynes J F, Shields A J 2018 Nature 557 400 Google Scholar
[27]	Ma X, Zeng P, Zhou H 2018 Phys. Rev. X 8 031043 Google Scholar
[28]	Wang X B, Yu Z W, Hu X L 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 062323 Google Scholar
[29]	Cui C H, Zhen Y Q, Wang R, Chen W, Wang S, Guo G C 2019 Phys. Rev. Appl. 11 034053 Google Scholar
[30]	Curty M, Azuma K, Lo H K 2019 Npj Quantum Inf. 5 1 Google Scholar
[31]	Lin J, Lütkenhaus N 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 042332 Google Scholar
[32]	Wang S, He D Y, Yin Z Q, Lu F Y, Cui C H, Chen W, Zhou Z, Guo G C, Han Z F 2019 Phys. Rev. X 9 021046 Google Scholar
[33]	Liu Y, Yu Z W, Zhang W, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 100505 Google Scholar
[34]	Zhong X, Hu J, Curty M, Qian L, Lo H K 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 100506 Google Scholar
[35]	Pittaluga M, Minder M, Lucamarini M, Sanzaro M, Shields A J 2021 Nat. Photon. 15 530 Google Scholar
[36]	Wang S, Yin Z Q, He D Y, Chen W, Wang R Q, Ye P, Zhou Y, Yuan-Fan G J, Wang F X, Chen W, Zhu Y G, Morozov P V, Divochiy A V, Zhou Z, Guo G C, Han Z F 2022 Nat. Photon. 16 154 Google Scholar
[37]	Wang Q, Chen W, Xavier G, Swillo M, Zhang T, Sauge S, Tengner M, Han Z F, Guo G C, Karlsson A 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 090501 Google Scholar
[38]	Zhang C H, Wang D, Zhou X Y, Wang S, Zhang L B, Yin Z Q, Chen W, Han Z H, Guo G C, Wang Q 2018 Opt. Express 26 25921 Google Scholar
[39]	朱峰, 王琴 2014 光学学报 6 0627002 Google Scholar Zhu F, Wang Q 2014 Acta Opt. Sin. 6 0627002 Google Scholar
[40]	王东 2017 博士学位论文 (合肥: 中国科学技术大学) Wang D 2017 Ph. D. Dissertation (Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China) (in Chinese)
[41]	张春辉 2020 博士学位论文 (南京: 南京邮电大学) Zhang C H 2020 Ph. D. Dissertation (Nanjing: nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications)
[42]	Wang Q, Karlsson A 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 014309 Google Scholar
[43]	Bock M, Lenhard A, Chunnilall C, Becher C 2016 Opt. Express 24 23992 Google Scholar
[44]	Aboussouan P, Alibart O, Ostrowsky D B, Baldi P, Tanzilli S 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 021801 Google Scholar
[45]	Kaneda F, Garay-Palmett K, U’Ren A B, Kwiat P G 2016 Opt. Express 24 10733 Google Scholar
[46]	Weston M M, Chrzanowski H M, Wollmann S, Boston A, Ho J, Shalm L K, Verma V B, Allman M S, Nam S W, Patel R B, Slussarenko S, Pryde G J 2016 Opt. Express 24 10869 Google Scholar
[47]	Zhong H S, Li Y, Li W, et al. 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 250505 Google Scholar
[48]	Sansa Perna A, Ortega E, Gräfe M, Steinlechner F 2022 Appl. Phys. Lett. 120 074001 Google Scholar
[49]	Gottesman D, Lo H K, Lütkenhaus N, Preskill J 2004 Quantum Inf. Comput. 5 325 Google Scholar
[50]	Wang Q, Wang X B, Guo G C 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75 012312 Google Scholar
[51]	Adachi Y, Yamamoto T, Koashi M, Imoto N 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 180503 Google Scholar
[52]	Wang Q, Zhang C H, Wang X B 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 032312 Google Scholar
[53]	Ma X, Qi B, Zhao Y, Lo H K 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 012326 Google Scholar
[54]	Zhang C H, Luo S L, Guo G C, Wang Q 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 022332 Google Scholar
[55]	Wang Q, Wang X B 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 052332 Google Scholar
[56]	Zhang C H, Zhang C M, Guo G C, Wang Q 2018 Opt. Express 26 4219 Google Scholar
[57]	Zhou Y H, Yu Z W, Wang X B 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 042324 Google Scholar
[58]	Xu F, Xu H, Lo H K 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 052333 Google Scholar
[59]	Zhang C H, Zhang C M, Wang Q 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 052325 Google Scholar
[60]	Hu X L, Yu Z W, Wang X B 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 032303 Google Scholar
[61]	Abruzzo S, Kampermann H, Bruß D 2014 Phys. Rev. A 89 012301 Google Scholar
[62]	Panayi C, Razavi M, Ma X, Lütkenhaus N 2014 New J. Phys. 16 043005 Google Scholar
[63]	Kaneda F, Xu F, Chapman J, Kwiat P G 2017 Optica 4 1034 Google Scholar
[64]	Xu H, Hu X L, Feng X L, Wang X B 2020 Opt. Lett. 45 4120 Google Scholar

[1]	Luo Yi-Zhen, Ma Luo-Jia, Sun Ming-Shuo, Wu Si-Rui, Qiu Li-Hua, Wang He, Wang Qin. Source monitoring quantum key distribution protocol based on heralded single photon source. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(24): 240302. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241269
[2]	Zhou Jiang-Ping, Zhou Yuan-Yuan, Zhou Xue-Jun. Asymmetric channel phase matching quantum key distribution. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(14): 140302. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230652
[3]	Zhou Yang, Ma Xiao, Zhou Xing-Yu, Zhang Chun-Hui, Wang Qin. Study of practical state-preparation error tolerant reference-frame-independent quantum key distribution protocol. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(24): 240301. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231144
[4]	Ma Xiao, Sun Ming-Shuo, Liu Jing-Yang, Ding Hua-Jian, Wang Qin. State preparation error tolerant quantum key distribution protocol based on heralded single photon source. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(3): 030301. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211456
[5]	Ye Wei, Guo Ying, Xia Ying, Zhong Hai, Zhang Huan, Ding Jian-Zhi, Hu Li-Yun. Discrete modulation continuous-variable quantum key distribution based on quantum catalysis. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(6): 060301. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191689
[6]	Wu Cheng-Feng, Du Ya-Nan, Wang Jin-Dong, Wei Zheng-Jun, Qin Xiao-Juan, Zhao Feng, Zhang Zhi-Ming. Analysis on performance optimization in measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution using weak coherent states. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(10): 100302. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.100302
[7]	Du Ya-Nan, Xie Wen-Zhong, Jin Xuan, Wang Jin-Dong, Wei Zheng-Jun, Qin Xiao-Juan, Zhao Feng, Zhang Zhi-Ming. Analysis on quantum bit error rate in measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution using weak coherent states. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(11): 110301. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.110301
[8]	Zhou Fei, Yong Hai-Lin, Li Dong-Dong, Yin Juan, Ren Ji-Gang, Peng Cheng-Zhi. Study on quantum key distribution between different media. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(14): 140303. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.140303
[9]	Hu Hua-Peng, Wang Jin-Dong, Huang Yu-Xian, Liu Song-Hao, Lu Wei. Nonorthogonal decoy-state quantum key distribution based on conditionally prepared down-conversion source. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(1): 287-292. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.287
[10]	Zhang Jing, Wang Fa-Qiang, Zhao Feng, Lu Yi-Qun, Liu Song-Hao. Quantum key distribution based on time coding and phase coding. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(8): 4941-4946. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.4941
[11]	Hu Hua-Peng, Zhang Jing, Wang Jin-Dong, Huang Yu-Xian, Lu Yi-Qun, Liu Song-Hao, Lu Wei. Experimental quantum key distribution with double protocol. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(9): 5605-5611. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.5605
[12]	He Guang-Qiang, Guo Hong-Bin, Li Yu-Dan, Zhu Si-Wei, Zeng Gui-Hua. Quantum key distribution using binary-modulated coherent states. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(4): 2212-2217. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.2212
[13]	Mi Jing-Long, Wang Fa-Qiang, Lin Qing-Qun, Liang Rui-Sheng, Liu Song-Hao. Decoy state quantum key distribution with dual detectors heralded single photon source. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(2): 678-684. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.678
[14]	Quan Dong-Xiao, Pei Chang-Xing, Zhu Chang-Hua, Liu Dan. New method of decoy state quantum key distribution with a heralded single-photon source. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(9): 5600-5604. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.5600
[15]	Chen Xia, Wang Fa-Qiang, Lu Yi-Qun, Zhao Feng, Li Ming-Ming, Mi Jing-Long, Liang Rui-Sheng, Liu Song-Hao. A phase modulated QKD system with two quantum cryptography protocols. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(11): 6434-6440. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.6434
[16]	Feng Fa-Yong, Zhang Qiang. Quantum key distribution based on hyperentanglement swapping. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(4): 1924-1927. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1924
[17]	Chen Jie, Li Yao, Wu Guang, Zeng He-Ping. Stable quantum key distribution with polarization control. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(9): 5243-5247. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.5243
[18]	Zhao Feng, Lu Yi-Qun, Wang Fa-Qiang, Chen Xia, Li Ming-Ming, Guo Bang-Hong, Liao Chang-Jun, Liu Song-Hao. Stable differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution based on weak coherent pulses. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(4): 2175-2179. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.2175
[19]	He Guang-Qiang, Yi Zhi, Zhu Jun, Zeng Gui-Hua. Quantum key distribution using two-mode squeezd states. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(11): 6427-6433. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.6427
[20]	Ma Hai-Qiang, Li Ya-Ling, Zhao Huan, Wu Ling-An. A quantum key distribution system based on two polarization beam splitters. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(11): 5014-5017. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.5014

Catalog

Vol. 71, Issue 17 - 2022-09-05

Metrics

Abstract views: 5851
PDF Downloads: 169
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板