-
In hypersonic flow, extremely high temperature due to shock aerodynamic heating leads plasma flow to form. By adding energy and momentum to the plas-ma flow field through the magnetic field on aircraft, the control of plasma flow field around aircraft can be realized. This has a broad prospect of applications in hypersonic aerodynamic control, aerothermal protection, and plasma distribution adjustment. Very recently, chemical reaction model and thermodynamic model were suggested to study the hypersonic magnetohydrodynamic control. However, the influence of different models and surface catalytic efficiency on hypersonic magnetohydrodynamic control are rarely analyzed in depth. In this study, a comparison of different chemical reaction models and the influence of surface catalytic efficiency are discussed. Three-dimensional (3D) nu-merical simulation method and program of extra magnetic field coupled with reentry plasma flow under the assumption of low magnetic Reynolds number are developed by solving 3D chemical non-equilibrium Navier-Stokes equations and Maxwell electromagnetic field governing equations. Based on this method, the influence of different gas component models, chemical reaction models, and surface catalytic efficiency on hypersonic magnetohydrodynamic control are analyzed. The results show that the conductivity of plasma, calculated by different gas component models and chemical reaction models, can be quite different from each other, thus can influence the accurate study on the structure of hypersonic magneto flow field as well as the aerothermal and aerodynamic characteristics. Based on the calculation conditions in this paper, the Park chemical model has advantages in the consistency and accuracy in numerical simulation. The magnetic thermal protection is greatly influenced by the surface catalytic efficiency and the correlation between the magnetic thermal protection and the surface catalytic efficiency is nonlinear and can be quite different in different region. As the surface catalytic efficiency increases, the influence of magnetic field on heat flux at stagnation point drops drastically, then increases slowly, which is a joint result of thermal conduction and chemical component diffusion. The influence of magnetic field on magnetohydrodynamic drag character is less affected by the surface catalytic efficiency. As the catalytic efficiency increases, the influence of magnetic field on magnetohydrodynamic drag character drops slowly. -
Keywords:
- magnetohydrodynamic /
- plasma /
- chemical non-equilibrium /
- numerical simulation
[1] 乐嘉陵 2005 再入物理(北京: 国防工业出版社)第23−43页
Le J L 2005 Reentry Physics (Beijing: National Defence Industry Press)pp23−43 (in Chinese)
[2] Maccormack R W 2005 36th AIAA Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference Toronto, Ontario Canada, June 6－9, 2005 p4780
[3] 潘勇 2007博士学位论文 (南京: 南京航空航天大学)
Pan Y 2007 Ph. D. Dissertation (Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics) (in Chinese)
[4] 董维中 1996 博士学位论文 (北京: 北京航空航天大学)
Dong W Z 1996 Ph. D. Dissertation (Beijing: Beihang University) (in Chinese)
[5] Bisek N J, Boyd I D 2010 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition Orlando, Florida, January 4−7, 2010 p227
[6] Bisek N J, Poggie J 2011 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition Orlando, Florida, January 4−7, 2011 p897
[7] Chernyshev A, Kurakin Y, Schmidt A 2012 18th AIAA/3AF International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference Tours, France, September 24−28, 2012 p5974
[8] Andrea C, Carlo A B 2012 43rd AIAA Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference New Orleans, Louisiana, June 25−28, 2012 p2733
[9] Fujino T, Ishikawa M 2013 44th AIAA Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference San Diego, CA, June 24−27, 2013 p3000
[10] Masuda K, Shimosawa Y, Fujino T 2015 46th AIAA Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference Dallas, TX, June 22−26, 2015 p3366
[11] 赫新, 陈坚强, 邓小刚 2005 空气动力学学报 23 267
Google Scholar
He X, Chen J Q, Deng X G 2005 Acta Aerodyn. Sin. 23 267
Google Scholar
[12] 田正雨 2008 博士学位论文(长沙: 国防科学技术大学)
Tian Z Y 2008 Ph. D. Dissertation (Changsha: National University of Defense Technology) (in Chinese)
[13] 陈刚, 张劲柏, 李椿萱 2008 力学学报 40 752
Chen G, Zhang J B, Li C X 2008 Chin. J. Theoret. Appl. Mech. 40 752
[14] 黄富来, 黄护林 2009 航空学报 30 183
Huang F L, Huang H L 2009 Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sin. 30 183
[15] 黄浩, 黄护林, 张喜东, 张义宁, 刘振德 2013 推进技术 34 706
Huang H, Huang H L, Zhang X D, Zhang Y N, Liu Z D 2013 J. Propuls. Technol. 34 706
[16] 何淼生, 杨文将, 郑小梅, 刘宇 2013 航空动力学报 28 365
He M S, Yang W J, Zheng X M, Liu Y 2013 J. Aerosp. Power 28 365
[17] 卜少科, 薛雅心 2014 现代电子技术 37 137
Google Scholar
Bu S K, Xue Y X 2014 Modern Electron. Tech. 37 137
Google Scholar
[18] 李开, 刘伟强 2016 物理学报 65 064701
Li K, Liu W Q 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 064701
[19] 李开, 柳军, 刘伟强 2017 物理学报 66 084702
Google Scholar
Li K, Liu J, Liu W Q 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 084702
Google Scholar
[20] 姚霄, 刘伟强, 谭建国 2018 物理学报 67 174702
Google Scholar
Yao X, Liu W Q, Tan J G 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 174702
Google Scholar
[21] 高铁锁, 李椿萱, 董维中, 张巧芸 2002 空气动力学学报 20 184
Google Scholar
Gao T S, Li C X, Dong W Z, Zhang Q Y 2002 Acta Aerodyn. Sin. 20 184
Google Scholar
[22] 高铁锁, 董维中, 丁明松, 江涛 2013 空气动力学学报 31 541
Google Scholar
Gao T S, Dong W Z, Ding M S, Jiang T 2013 Acta Aerodyn. Sin. 31 541
Google Scholar
[23] 高铁锁, 董维中, 江涛, 丁明松, 刘庆宗 2016 宇航学报 37 1193
Google Scholar
Gao T S, Dong W Z, Jiang T, Ding M S, Liu Q Z 2016 J. Astronaut. 37 1193
Google Scholar
[24] 丁明松, 江涛, 董维中, 高铁锁, 刘庆宗 2017 航空学报 38 121030
Ding M S, Jiang T, Dong W Z, Gao T S, Liu Q Z 2017 Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sin. 38 121030
[25] Dunn M G, Kang S W 1973 NASA CR-2232
[26] Park C 1993 J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer 7 385
Google Scholar
[27] Gupta R N, Yos J M, Thompson R A 1990 NASA RP-1232
[28] Gokcen T 1995 33rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit Reno, NV, January 9−12, 1995 p156
[29] 丁明松, 董维中, 高铁锁, 刘庆宗 2018 航空学报 39 12588
Ding M S, Dong W Z, Gao T S, Liu Q Z 2018 Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sin. 39 12588
[30] 丁明松, 董维中, 高铁锁, 江涛, 刘庆宗 2017 宇航学报 38 1361
Ding M S, Dong W Z, Gao T S, Jiang T, Liu Q Z 2017 J. Astronaut. 38 1361
[31] Yasunori N, Hirotaka O 2012 43rd AIAA Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference New Orleans, Louisiana, June 25−28, 2012 p2734
[32] Candler G V, MacCormack R W 1988 26th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Reno, Nevada, January 11−14, 1988 p511
-
图 1 磁场配置(
${B_0} = 0.2\;{\rm{T}}$ )Figure 1. Magnetic field (
${B_0} = 0.2\;{\rm{T}}$ ).
图 2 球柱阻力特性 (a) 磁阻力伞; (b) 阻力系数
Figure 2. Drag characteristics of ball-column model: (a) Magneto-resistance parachute; (b) drag coefficient.
图 3 不同网格条件下的参数 (a) 电导率; (b) 电子数密度; (c) 热流
Figure 3. Parameter of different grids: (a) Conductivity; (b) ele-ctronic number density; (c) heat flux.
图 4 驻点线参数分布(
${B_0} = 0\;{\rm{T}}$ ) (a) 电导率; (b) 电子数密度; (c) 温度Figure 4. Parameter along stagnation line(
${B_0} = 0\;{\rm{T}}$ ): (a) Conductivity; (b) electronic number density; (c) temperature
图 5 驻点线温度和电子数密度分布(
${B_0} = 0.5\;{\rm{ T}}$ ) (a) 温度; (b) 电子数密度Figure 5. Temperature and electronic number density along stagnation line (
${B_0} = 0.5\;{\rm{T}}$ ): (a) Temperature; (b) electronic number density.
图 6 表面热流 (a) Dunn-Kang 模型; (b) Park模型; (c) Gupta模型
Figure 6. Heat flux on wall: (a) Dunn-Kang model; (b) Park model; (c) Gupta model.
图 7 不同模型的电子数密度 (a) 7组分; (b) 11组分
Figure 7. Electron number density: (a) 7 speices; (b) 11 speices.
图 8 流场结构云图 (a) Case 1; (b) case 2
Figure 8. Flow structure map: (a) Case 1; (b) case 2.
图 9 表面压力和热流 (a) 压力; (b) 热流
Figure 9. Surface pressure and heat flux: (a) Pressure; (b) heat flux.
图 10 不同壁面催化系数条件下驻点线参数分布 (
${B_0} = 0\;{\rm{T}}$ ) (a) 电子数密度; (b) 电导率Figure 10. Parameter along stagnation line of different catalytic efficiency (
${B_0} = 0\;{\rm{T}}$ ): (a) Electronic number density; (b) conductivity
图 11 不同催化系数条件下阻力系数及磁场作用效果 (a) 阻力系数; (b) 阻力系数增大百分比
Figure 11. Effect of different catalytic efficiency conditions: (a) Drag coefficient; (b) drag coefficient increment ratio.
图 12 不同催化复合系数条件下热流受磁场作用的影响 (a) 表面热流; (b) 驻点热流; (c) 磁场效果
Figure 12. Effect of different catalytic efficiency conditions: (a) Surface heat flux; (b) heat flux at stagnation point; (c) magnetic effect.
图 13 不同催化复合系数条件下驻点线原子组分分布 (a)
$\alpha = 0.001$ ; (b)$\alpha = 0.75$ ; (c)$\alpha = 0.75$ Figure 13. Atomic components along stagnation line: (a)
$\alpha = 0.001$ ; (b)$\alpha = 0.75$ ; (c)$\alpha = 0.75$ .表 1 表面复合反应
Table 1. Surface combinative reaction.
r 化学反应式 r 化学反应式 1 O + O$ \Rightarrow $O2 5 N+ + e$ \Rightarrow $N 2 N + N$ \Rightarrow $N2 6 O2+ + e$ \Rightarrow $O2 3 NO+ + e$ \Rightarrow $NO 7 N2+ + e$ \Rightarrow $N2 4 O+ + e$ \Rightarrow $O 
DownLoad: CSV
表 2 球柱阻力系数(
${B_0} = 0.2\;{\rm{T}}$ )Table 2. Drag coefficient of ball-column model(
${B_0} = 0.2\;{\rm{T}}$ ).夹角$\theta $ 文献结果[31] 本文结果 差异 0º 1.8202 1.8287 0.47% 45º 1.6670 1.6706 0.22% 90º 1.4755 1.4804 0.33%
DownLoad: CSV
表 3 不同空气化学模型阻力系数
Table 3. Drag coefficient under different air chemical models.
模型 ${B_0} = 0\;{\rm{T}}$ ${B_0} = 0.5\;{\rm{T}}$ 增大比例/% 7Ns Dunn-Kang 0.297472 0.478081 61 11Ns Dunn-Kang 0.291129 0.812020 179 7Ns Gupta 0.301072 0.518692 72 11Ns Gupta 0.258772 0.795648 207 7Ns Park 0.290045 0.482885 67 11Ns Park 0.289986 0.489154 69
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] 乐嘉陵 2005 再入物理(北京: 国防工业出版社)第23−43页
Le J L 2005 Reentry Physics (Beijing: National Defence Industry Press)pp23−43 (in Chinese)
[2] Maccormack R W 2005 36th AIAA Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference Toronto, Ontario Canada, June 6－9, 2005 p4780
[3] 潘勇 2007博士学位论文 (南京: 南京航空航天大学)
Pan Y 2007 Ph. D. Dissertation (Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics) (in Chinese)
[4] 董维中 1996 博士学位论文 (北京: 北京航空航天大学)
Dong W Z 1996 Ph. D. Dissertation (Beijing: Beihang University) (in Chinese)
[5] Bisek N J, Boyd I D 2010 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition Orlando, Florida, January 4−7, 2010 p227
[6] Bisek N J, Poggie J 2011 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition Orlando, Florida, January 4−7, 2011 p897
[7] Chernyshev A, Kurakin Y, Schmidt A 2012 18th AIAA/3AF International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference Tours, France, September 24−28, 2012 p5974
[8] Andrea C, Carlo A B 2012 43rd AIAA Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference New Orleans, Louisiana, June 25−28, 2012 p2733
[9] Fujino T, Ishikawa M 2013 44th AIAA Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference San Diego, CA, June 24−27, 2013 p3000
[10] Masuda K, Shimosawa Y, Fujino T 2015 46th AIAA Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference Dallas, TX, June 22−26, 2015 p3366
[11] 赫新, 陈坚强, 邓小刚 2005 空气动力学学报 23 267
Google Scholar
He X, Chen J Q, Deng X G 2005 Acta Aerodyn. Sin. 23 267
Google Scholar
[12] 田正雨 2008 博士学位论文(长沙: 国防科学技术大学)
Tian Z Y 2008 Ph. D. Dissertation (Changsha: National University of Defense Technology) (in Chinese)
[13] 陈刚, 张劲柏, 李椿萱 2008 力学学报 40 752
Chen G, Zhang J B, Li C X 2008 Chin. J. Theoret. Appl. Mech. 40 752
[14] 黄富来, 黄护林 2009 航空学报 30 183
Huang F L, Huang H L 2009 Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sin. 30 183
[15] 黄浩, 黄护林, 张喜东, 张义宁, 刘振德 2013 推进技术 34 706
Huang H, Huang H L, Zhang X D, Zhang Y N, Liu Z D 2013 J. Propuls. Technol. 34 706
[16] 何淼生, 杨文将, 郑小梅, 刘宇 2013 航空动力学报 28 365
He M S, Yang W J, Zheng X M, Liu Y 2013 J. Aerosp. Power 28 365
[17] 卜少科, 薛雅心 2014 现代电子技术 37 137
Google Scholar
Bu S K, Xue Y X 2014 Modern Electron. Tech. 37 137
Google Scholar
[18] 李开, 刘伟强 2016 物理学报 65 064701
Li K, Liu W Q 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 064701
[19] 李开, 柳军, 刘伟强 2017 物理学报 66 084702
Google Scholar
Li K, Liu J, Liu W Q 2017 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 084702
Google Scholar
[20] 姚霄, 刘伟强, 谭建国 2018 物理学报 67 174702
Google Scholar
Yao X, Liu W Q, Tan J G 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 174702
Google Scholar
[21] 高铁锁, 李椿萱, 董维中, 张巧芸 2002 空气动力学学报 20 184
Google Scholar
Gao T S, Li C X, Dong W Z, Zhang Q Y 2002 Acta Aerodyn. Sin. 20 184
Google Scholar
[22] 高铁锁, 董维中, 丁明松, 江涛 2013 空气动力学学报 31 541
Google Scholar
Gao T S, Dong W Z, Ding M S, Jiang T 2013 Acta Aerodyn. Sin. 31 541
Google Scholar
[23] 高铁锁, 董维中, 江涛, 丁明松, 刘庆宗 2016 宇航学报 37 1193
Google Scholar
Gao T S, Dong W Z, Jiang T, Ding M S, Liu Q Z 2016 J. Astronaut. 37 1193
Google Scholar
[24] 丁明松, 江涛, 董维中, 高铁锁, 刘庆宗 2017 航空学报 38 121030
Ding M S, Jiang T, Dong W Z, Gao T S, Liu Q Z 2017 Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sin. 38 121030
[25] Dunn M G, Kang S W 1973 NASA CR-2232
[26] Park C 1993 J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer 7 385
Google Scholar
[27] Gupta R N, Yos J M, Thompson R A 1990 NASA RP-1232
[28] Gokcen T 1995 33rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit Reno, NV, January 9−12, 1995 p156
[29] 丁明松, 董维中, 高铁锁, 刘庆宗 2018 航空学报 39 12588
Ding M S, Dong W Z, Gao T S, Liu Q Z 2018 Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sin. 39 12588
[30] 丁明松, 董维中, 高铁锁, 江涛, 刘庆宗 2017 宇航学报 38 1361
Ding M S, Dong W Z, Gao T S, Jiang T, Liu Q Z 2017 J. Astronaut. 38 1361
[31] Yasunori N, Hirotaka O 2012 43rd AIAA Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference New Orleans, Louisiana, June 25−28, 2012 p2734
[32] Candler G V, MacCormack R W 1988 26th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Reno, Nevada, January 11−14, 1988 p511
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 7519
- PDF Downloads: 93
- Cited By: 0
