Multi-party quantum key agreement based on <i>d</i>-level GHZ states

Tang Jie; Shi Lei; Wei Jia-Hua; Yu Hui-Cun; Xue Yang; Wu Tian-Xiong

doi:10.7498/aps.69.20200799

Abstract

A multi-party quantum key agreement protocol based on d-level multi-particle GHZ states is proposed. The “d-level” is common in other quantum cryptographic protocols, but there are few researches in the field of quantum key agreement. In our scheme, we introduce two indistinguishable orthogonal bases, i.e. the quantum Fourier transform and shift operation, into a d-level quantum system. In addition, we make full use of shift operation to encode the key into the sequence of quantum states, and the key can be measured by the d-level Z-basis. By decoding and calculating, each participant can equally extract other participants’ key and obtain the final shared key $ K = {K_0} \oplus {K_1} \oplus \cdots \oplus {K_{k - 1}}$. The protocol resists external eavesdropping by inserting decoy states and conducting two security checks. Furthermore, we present an example by assigning certain values to parameters for illustrative purpose. Finally, QKA protocol mainly involves two types of attacks: participant attack and external attack. The external attack can be divided into Trojan attack, intercept-resend attack, and entangle-measure attack. To demonstrate the security of the scheme, we analyze the two types of attacks. The results show that the scheme can effectively resist the attack from internal participants and external eavesdroppers. However, the premise of our protocol is based on the ideal quantum channel. In practical applications, particles are usually affected by noise in the process of quantum channel transmission. Therefore, how the agreement adapts itself to a more complicated environment is our main work in the future.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

Institute of Information and Navigation, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710077, China

Corresponding author: Wei Jia-Hua, weijiahua@126.com

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61971436) and the Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61803382)

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Zhou N, Zeng G, Xiong J 2004 Electron. Lett. 40 1149 Google Scholar
[2]	Chong S K, Hwang, T 2010 Opt. Commun. 283 1192 Google Scholar
[3]	Huang W, Su Q, Wu X, Li Y B, Sun L 2014 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53 2891 Google Scholar
[4]	Shen D S, Ma W P, Wang L L 2014 Quantum Inf. Process. 13 2313 Google Scholar
[5]	He Y F, Ma W P 2015 Quantum Inf. Process. 14 3483 Google Scholar
[6]	He Y F, Ma W P 2017 Int. J. Quantum Inf. 3 1750018 Google Scholar
[7]	Yang Y G, Li B R, Li D, Zhou Y H, Shi W M 2019 Quantum Inf. Process. 18 322 Google Scholar
[8]	Zhou Y H, Wang M F, Shi W M, Yang Y G, Zhang J 2020 Quantum Inf. Process. 19 100 Google Scholar
[9]	Shi R H, Zhong H 2013 Quantum Inf. Process 12 921 Google Scholar
[10]	Liu B, Gao F, Huang W, Wen Q Y 2013 Quantum Inf. Process. 12 1797 Google Scholar
[11]	Sun Z, Zhang C, Wang B H, Li Q, Long D Y 2013 Quantum Inf. Process. 12 3411 Google Scholar
[12]	尹逊汝, 马文平, 申冬苏, 王丽丽 2013 物理学报 62 170304 Google Scholar Yin X R, Ma W P, Shen D S, Wang L L 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 170304 Google Scholar
[13]	Xu G B, Wen Q Y, Gao F, Qin S J 2014 Quantum Inf. Process. 13 2587 Google Scholar
[14]	Sun Z, Zhang C, Wang P, Yu J P, Zhang Y, Long D Y 2016 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55 1920 Google Scholar
[15]	Sun Z, Yu J, Wang P 2016 Quantum Inf. Process. 15 373 Google Scholar
[16]	Cai T, Jiang M, Cao G 2018 Quantum Inf. Process. 17 103 Google Scholar
[17]	Lin S, Guo G D, Chen A M, Liu X F 2019 Quantum Inf. Process. 18 1 Google Scholar
[18]	Liu H N, Liang X Q, Jiang D H, Zhang Y H, Xu G B 2019 Quantum Inf. Process. 18 242 Google Scholar
[19]	Zhou N R, Zhu K N, Wang Y Q 2020 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 59 663 Google Scholar
[20]	Huang W, Wen Q Y, Liu B, Su Q, Gao F 2014 Quantum Inf. Process. 13 1651 Google Scholar
[21]	Cai B B, Guo G D, Lin S 2017 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56 1039 Google Scholar
[22]	Min S Q, Chen H Y, Gong L H 2018 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57 1811 Google Scholar
[23]	Wang S S, Xu G B, Liang X Q 2018 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57 3716 Google Scholar
[24]	Zhao X Q, Zhou N R, Chen H Y, Gong L H 2019 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 58 436 Google Scholar
[25]	Liu H N, Liang X Q, Jiang D H, Zhang Y H, Xu G B 2019 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 58 1659 Google Scholar
[26]	Yin X R, Ma W P 2019 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 58 631 Google Scholar
[27]	Zhou Y H, Zhang J, Shi W M, Yang Y G 2020 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 4 2050083 Google Scholar
[28]	Wang W, Zhou B M, Zhang L 2020 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 59 1944 Google Scholar
[29]	Tang J, Shi L, Wei J H 2020 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 49 2050201 Google Scholar
[30]	Bouwmeester D, Pan J W, Daniell M, Weinfurte H, Zeilinger A 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 1345 Google Scholar
[31]	周南润, 宋汉冲, 龙黎华, 刘晔 2012 物理学报 61 214203 Google Scholar Zhou N R, Chong S H, Gong L H, Liu Y 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 214203 Google Scholar
[32]	Zhang Z J, Man Z X, Shi S H 2005 Int. J. Quantum Inf. 03 555 Google Scholar
[33]	Hwang T, Hwang C C, Li C M 2011 Phys. Scripta 83 045004 Google Scholar
[34]	Kao S H, Tsai C W, Tzonelih H 2011 Commun. Theor. Phys. 55 1007 Google Scholar
[35]	Cai Q Y 2006 Phys. Lett. A 351 23 Google Scholar
[36]	Deng F G, Li X H, Zhou H Y, Zhang Z J 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 044302 Google Scholar
[37]	Cabello A 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 5633 Google Scholar

Cited By

表 1 本文协议和其他协议比较

Table 1. Comparison between our protocols and the other protocols.

QKA protocol	Quantum resource	Qubit efficiency
Liu et al.’s protocols^[10]	GHZ states	${1}/[{ {2 k\left( {k - 1} \right)} }]$
Xu et al.’s protocols^[12]	Single photons	${1}/[{ {2 k\left( {k - 1} \right)} }]$
Sun et al.’s protocols^[14]	Six-qubit states	${1}/({ {2 k} })$
Our protocol	GHZ states	${1}/({ {3 k} })$

DownLoad: CSV

[1]	Zhou N, Zeng G, Xiong J 2004 Electron. Lett. 40 1149 Google Scholar
[2]	Chong S K, Hwang, T 2010 Opt. Commun. 283 1192 Google Scholar
[3]	Huang W, Su Q, Wu X, Li Y B, Sun L 2014 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 53 2891 Google Scholar
[4]	Shen D S, Ma W P, Wang L L 2014 Quantum Inf. Process. 13 2313 Google Scholar
[5]	He Y F, Ma W P 2015 Quantum Inf. Process. 14 3483 Google Scholar
[6]	He Y F, Ma W P 2017 Int. J. Quantum Inf. 3 1750018 Google Scholar
[7]	Yang Y G, Li B R, Li D, Zhou Y H, Shi W M 2019 Quantum Inf. Process. 18 322 Google Scholar
[8]	Zhou Y H, Wang M F, Shi W M, Yang Y G, Zhang J 2020 Quantum Inf. Process. 19 100 Google Scholar
[9]	Shi R H, Zhong H 2013 Quantum Inf. Process 12 921 Google Scholar
[10]	Liu B, Gao F, Huang W, Wen Q Y 2013 Quantum Inf. Process. 12 1797 Google Scholar
[11]	Sun Z, Zhang C, Wang B H, Li Q, Long D Y 2013 Quantum Inf. Process. 12 3411 Google Scholar
[12]	尹逊汝, 马文平, 申冬苏, 王丽丽 2013 物理学报 62 170304 Google Scholar Yin X R, Ma W P, Shen D S, Wang L L 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 170304 Google Scholar
[13]	Xu G B, Wen Q Y, Gao F, Qin S J 2014 Quantum Inf. Process. 13 2587 Google Scholar
[14]	Sun Z, Zhang C, Wang P, Yu J P, Zhang Y, Long D Y 2016 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55 1920 Google Scholar
[15]	Sun Z, Yu J, Wang P 2016 Quantum Inf. Process. 15 373 Google Scholar
[16]	Cai T, Jiang M, Cao G 2018 Quantum Inf. Process. 17 103 Google Scholar
[17]	Lin S, Guo G D, Chen A M, Liu X F 2019 Quantum Inf. Process. 18 1 Google Scholar
[18]	Liu H N, Liang X Q, Jiang D H, Zhang Y H, Xu G B 2019 Quantum Inf. Process. 18 242 Google Scholar
[19]	Zhou N R, Zhu K N, Wang Y Q 2020 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 59 663 Google Scholar
[20]	Huang W, Wen Q Y, Liu B, Su Q, Gao F 2014 Quantum Inf. Process. 13 1651 Google Scholar
[21]	Cai B B, Guo G D, Lin S 2017 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56 1039 Google Scholar
[22]	Min S Q, Chen H Y, Gong L H 2018 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57 1811 Google Scholar
[23]	Wang S S, Xu G B, Liang X Q 2018 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57 3716 Google Scholar
[24]	Zhao X Q, Zhou N R, Chen H Y, Gong L H 2019 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 58 436 Google Scholar
[25]	Liu H N, Liang X Q, Jiang D H, Zhang Y H, Xu G B 2019 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 58 1659 Google Scholar
[26]	Yin X R, Ma W P 2019 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 58 631 Google Scholar
[27]	Zhou Y H, Zhang J, Shi W M, Yang Y G 2020 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 4 2050083 Google Scholar
[28]	Wang W, Zhou B M, Zhang L 2020 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 59 1944 Google Scholar
[29]	Tang J, Shi L, Wei J H 2020 Mod. Phys. Lett. B 49 2050201 Google Scholar
[30]	Bouwmeester D, Pan J W, Daniell M, Weinfurte H, Zeilinger A 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 1345 Google Scholar
[31]	周南润, 宋汉冲, 龙黎华, 刘晔 2012 物理学报 61 214203 Google Scholar Zhou N R, Chong S H, Gong L H, Liu Y 2012 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 214203 Google Scholar
[32]	Zhang Z J, Man Z X, Shi S H 2005 Int. J. Quantum Inf. 03 555 Google Scholar
[33]	Hwang T, Hwang C C, Li C M 2011 Phys. Scripta 83 045004 Google Scholar
[34]	Kao S H, Tsai C W, Tzonelih H 2011 Commun. Theor. Phys. 55 1007 Google Scholar
[35]	Cai Q Y 2006 Phys. Lett. A 351 23 Google Scholar
[36]	Deng F G, Li X H, Zhou H Y, Zhang Z J 2005 Phys. Rev. A 72 044302 Google Scholar
[37]	Cabello A 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 5633 Google Scholar

[1]	Gong Li-Hua, Chen Zhen-Yong, Xu Liang-Chao, Zhou Nan-Run. Bi-directional semi-quantum secure direct communication protocol based on high-dimensional single-particle states. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(13): 130304. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211702
[2]	Rong Min-Xi, Xin Xiang-Jun, Li Fa-Gen. Quantum signature for designated verifier with strong security. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(19): 190302. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200244
[3]	Li Wen-Tao, Yu Wen-Tao, Yao Ming-Hai. H/D + Li2 LiH/LiD + Li reactions studied by quantum time-dependent wave packet approach. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(10): 103401. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180324
[4]	Li Jin, Wang Hai-Yan, Li You, Zhang Qiu-Yue, Jia Yu. First-principle study of the optical absorption spectra of chalcogen on D-A and D--A copolymers. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(10): 103101. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.103101
[5]	Xie Tian-Ting, Deng Ke, Luo Mao-Kang. Direct transport of particles in two-dimensional asymmetric periodic time-shift corrugated channel. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(15): 150501. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.150501
[6]	Li Jian, Chen Yan-Hua, Pan Ze-Shi, Sun Feng-Qi, Li Na, Li Lei-Lei. Security analysis of BB84 protocol in the collective-rotation noise channel. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(3): 030302. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.030302
[7]	Zhang Bo, Li Hai-Yang, Tang Guo-Jin. Smith fuzzy control of teleoperation rendezvous with variable time delay. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(2): 029601. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.029601
[8]	Yin Xun-Ru, Ma Wen-Ping, Shen Dong-Su, Wang Li-Li. Three-party quantum key agreement with Bell states. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(17): 170304. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.170304
[9]	Lu Yuan, Huang Peng, Zhu Jun, Dai Wen-Chao, Zeng Gui-Hua. The practical security and performance analysis of the quantum data stream cipher system by the αη protocol. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(8): 080301. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.080301
[10]	Zhao Nan, Pei Chang-Xing, Liu Dan, Quan Dong-Xiao, Sun Xiao-Nan. Quantum key distribution secure threshold based on BB84 protocol. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(9): 090307. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.090307
[11]	Wang Jing, Jiang Guo-Ping. Cryptanalysis of a hyper-chaotic image encryption algorithm and its improved version. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(6): 060503. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.060503
[12]	Shen Yong, Zou Hong-Xin. Security bound of continuous-variable quantum key distribution with discrete modulation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(3): 1473-1480. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.1473
[13]	Wang Tian-Yin, Qin Su-Juan, Wen Qiao-Yan, Zhun Fu-Chen. Analysis and improvement of multiparty controlled quantum secure direct communication protocol. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(12): 7452-7456. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.7452
[14]	Du Jian-Zhong, Chen Xiu-Bo, Wen Qiao-Yan, Zhu Fu-Chen. Secure multiparty quantum summation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(11): 6214-6219. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.6214
[15]	Wang Jian, Chen Huang-Qing, Zhang Quan, Tang Chao-Jing. Multiparty controlled quantum secure direct communication protocol. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(2): 673-677. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.673
[16]	Wang Kai, Pei Wen-Jiang, Zou Liu-Hua, He Zhen-Ya. Cryptanalysis of multiple chaotic systems based public key encryption technique. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(12): 6243-6247. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.6243
[17]	Yang Yu-Guang, Wen Qiao-Yan, Zhu Fu-Chen. Multi-party multi-level quantum key distribution protocol based on entanglement swapping. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(12): 5544-5548. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.5544
[18]	Bai Li-Hua, Zhang Qing-Gang, Liu Xin-Guo. Four-dimensional quantum scattering calculations on the D+CD4→CD3+D2 reaction. Acta Physica Sinica, 2003, 52(11): 2774-2780. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.2774
[19]	Zhang Quan, Tang Chao-Jing, Zhang Shen-Qiang. . Acta Physica Sinica, 2002, 51(7): 1439-1447. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.1439
[20]	Yang Li, Wu Ling-An, Liu Song-Hao. . Acta Physica Sinica, 2002, 51(11): 2446-2451. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.2446

Catalog

Vol. 69, Issue 20 - 2020-10-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 4475
PDF Downloads: 92
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板

Multi-party quantum key agreement based on d-level GHZ states

Abstract

Authors and contacts

Corresponding author: Wei Jia-Hua, weijiahua@126.com

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

Cited By

Catalog

Metrics

Authors

Referees

About Journal

About

Search

Article

留言板

Multi-party quantum key agreement based on d-level GHZ states

Abstract

Authors and contacts

Corresponding author: Wei Jia-Hua, weijiahua@126.com

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

Cited By

Catalog

Metrics

Publishing process

Authors

Referees

About Journal

About