-
The magnetic properties of Fe-based alloy ribbons are sensitive to stress, and it’s an interesting scientific question whether stress-induced magnetic anisotropy during annealing procedure can be eliminated by tempering. In this paper, the synchrotron radiation technique was used to observe the microstructure of Fe73.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B9 amorphous ribbons annealed at 540 ℃ for 30 minutes under 394.7MPa stress and tempered several times at the same temperature. The macroscopic elongation of the samples during stress annealing and tempering was recorded by SupereyesB011 microcamera, and the magnetic anisotropy of the samples was measured by HP4294A impedance analyzer. After fitting the experimental data, it is found that: (a) The lattice anisotropy, macroscopic strain and magnetic anisotropy of the sample show negative exponential attenuation with the tempering times, and their final residual are 19.04%. 98.27% and 31.65%. (b) Multiple tempering can not completely eliminate lattice anisotropy, macroscopic strain and magnetic anisotropy induced by stress annealing. (c) The magnetic anisotropy of the sample has a linear relationship with the lattice anisotropy, but the intercept between the reverse extension line of the relation curve and the longitudinal coordinate is not zero. When the lattice anisotropy is zero, there is still 16.36% magnetic anisotropy. This is different from Ohnuma's conclusion that lattice anisotropy is the direct cause of magnetic anisotropy. (d) The structure anisotropy caused by the residual stress after stress annealing is the main cause of magnetic anisotropy, but it is not the only reason. The directional congregation of agglomerated nanocrystalline grains caused by creep of amorphous substrates during stress annealing is also an important cause of magnetic anisotropy induced by stress annealing. Moreover, the magnetic anisotropy induced by the directional congregation of agglomerated nanocrystalline grains due to the creep of amorphous substrates during stress annealing can not be completely eliminated by tempering.
-
Keywords:
- stress annealing /
- tempering /
- structure anisotropy /
- magnetic anisotropy
[1] Yoshizawa Y, Oguma S, Yamauchi K 1988 J. Appl. Phys. 64 6044Google Scholar
[2] Yoshizawa Y, Yamauchi K 1990 Mater. Trans. 31 307Google Scholar
[3] Yoshizawa Y, Yamauchi K 1991 Mat. Sci. Eng. A: Struct. 133 176Google Scholar
[4] Tejedor M, Hernando B, Sanchez M L, Prida V M, Garciabeneytez J M, Vazquez M, Herzer G 1998 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 185 61Google Scholar
[5] Herzer G 1992 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 112 258Google Scholar
[6] Yoshizawa Y, Yamauchi K 1989 IEEE Trans. Magn. 25 3324Google Scholar
[7] Kraus L, Zavěta K, Heczko O, Duhaj P, Vlasak G, Schneider J 1992 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 112 275Google Scholar
[8] Fukunaga H, Furukawa N, Tanaka H, Nakano M 2000 J. Appl. Phys. 87 7103Google Scholar
[9] Herzer G 1994 IEEE Trans. Magn. 30 4800Google Scholar
[10] 方允樟, 郑金菊, 施方也, 吴锋民, 孙怀君, 林根金, 杨晓红, 满其奎, 叶方敏 2008 中国科学: E辑 技术科学 38 428Google Scholar
Fang Y Z, Zheng J J, Shi F Y, Wu F M, Sun H J, Lin G J, Yang X H, Man Q K, Ye F M 2008 Sci. Sin. E: Tech. 38 428Google Scholar
[11] Ohnuma M, Hono K, Yanai T, Nakano M, Fukunaga H, Yoshizawa Y 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 152513Google Scholar
[12] Hofmann B, Kronmüller H 1996 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 152 91Google Scholar
[13] Ohnuma M, Hono K, Yanai T, Fukunaga H, Yoshizawa Y 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 2859Google Scholar
[14] Ohnuma M, Herzer G, Kozikowski P, Polak C, Budinsky V, Koppoju S 2012 Acta Mater. 60 1278Google Scholar
[15] 杨全民, 王玲玲, 孙德成 2005 物理学报 54 5730Google Scholar
Yang Q M, Wang L L, Sun D C 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 5730Google Scholar
[16] 杨全民, 王玲玲 2005 物理学报 54 4256Google Scholar
Yang Q M, Wang L L 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 4256Google Scholar
[17] Nutor R K, Xu X J, Fan X Z, Ren S S, He X W, Fang Y Z 2018 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 454 51Google Scholar
[18] Nutor R K, Fan X Z, He X W, Xu X J, Lu X A, Jiang J Z, Fang Y Z 2019 J. Alloy. Compd. 774 1243Google Scholar
[19] 施方也, 方允樟, 孙怀君, 郑金菊, 林根金, 吴锋民 2007 物理学报 56 4009Google Scholar
Shi F Y, Fang Y Z, Sun H J, Zheng J J, Lin G J, Wu F M 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 4009Google Scholar
[20] Fang Y Z, Zheng J J, Wu F M, Xu Q M, Zhang J Q, Ye H Q, Zheng J L, Li T Y 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 96 92508Google Scholar
-
常数项 指数项 拟合优度 残余晶格各向异性$\alpha $/% 19.04 $80.93 \times {{\rm{e}}^{ - n/0.51}}$ 0.99829 残余宏观应变$\delta $/% 98.27 $1.73 \times {{\rm{e}}^{ - n/0.48}}$ 0.99913 残余磁各向异性$\gamma $/% 31.65 $68.30 \times {{\rm{e}}^{ - n/0.56}}$ 0.99604 -
[1] Yoshizawa Y, Oguma S, Yamauchi K 1988 J. Appl. Phys. 64 6044Google Scholar
[2] Yoshizawa Y, Yamauchi K 1990 Mater. Trans. 31 307Google Scholar
[3] Yoshizawa Y, Yamauchi K 1991 Mat. Sci. Eng. A: Struct. 133 176Google Scholar
[4] Tejedor M, Hernando B, Sanchez M L, Prida V M, Garciabeneytez J M, Vazquez M, Herzer G 1998 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 185 61Google Scholar
[5] Herzer G 1992 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 112 258Google Scholar
[6] Yoshizawa Y, Yamauchi K 1989 IEEE Trans. Magn. 25 3324Google Scholar
[7] Kraus L, Zavěta K, Heczko O, Duhaj P, Vlasak G, Schneider J 1992 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 112 275Google Scholar
[8] Fukunaga H, Furukawa N, Tanaka H, Nakano M 2000 J. Appl. Phys. 87 7103Google Scholar
[9] Herzer G 1994 IEEE Trans. Magn. 30 4800Google Scholar
[10] 方允樟, 郑金菊, 施方也, 吴锋民, 孙怀君, 林根金, 杨晓红, 满其奎, 叶方敏 2008 中国科学: E辑 技术科学 38 428Google Scholar
Fang Y Z, Zheng J J, Shi F Y, Wu F M, Sun H J, Lin G J, Yang X H, Man Q K, Ye F M 2008 Sci. Sin. E: Tech. 38 428Google Scholar
[11] Ohnuma M, Hono K, Yanai T, Nakano M, Fukunaga H, Yoshizawa Y 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 86 152513Google Scholar
[12] Hofmann B, Kronmüller H 1996 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 152 91Google Scholar
[13] Ohnuma M, Hono K, Yanai T, Fukunaga H, Yoshizawa Y 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 2859Google Scholar
[14] Ohnuma M, Herzer G, Kozikowski P, Polak C, Budinsky V, Koppoju S 2012 Acta Mater. 60 1278Google Scholar
[15] 杨全民, 王玲玲, 孙德成 2005 物理学报 54 5730Google Scholar
Yang Q M, Wang L L, Sun D C 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 5730Google Scholar
[16] 杨全民, 王玲玲 2005 物理学报 54 4256Google Scholar
Yang Q M, Wang L L 2005 Acta Phys. Sin. 54 4256Google Scholar
[17] Nutor R K, Xu X J, Fan X Z, Ren S S, He X W, Fang Y Z 2018 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 454 51Google Scholar
[18] Nutor R K, Fan X Z, He X W, Xu X J, Lu X A, Jiang J Z, Fang Y Z 2019 J. Alloy. Compd. 774 1243Google Scholar
[19] 施方也, 方允樟, 孙怀君, 郑金菊, 林根金, 吴锋民 2007 物理学报 56 4009Google Scholar
Shi F Y, Fang Y Z, Sun H J, Zheng J J, Lin G J, Wu F M 2007 Acta Phys. Sin. 56 4009Google Scholar
[20] Fang Y Z, Zheng J J, Wu F M, Xu Q M, Zhang J Q, Ye H Q, Zheng J L, Li T Y 2010 Appl. Phys. Lett. 96 92508Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 6906
- PDF Downloads: 46
- Cited By: 0