-
Aiming at the problems of low accuracy and low adaptability of the existing ship magnetic field inversion modeling methods with equivalent sources, a new method of inversion modeling of magnetic monopole array of ship magnetic fields is proposed. Three-dimensional ship magnetic monopole array is arranged according to the ship ferromagnetic structure, and the inversion prediction model of ship magnetic fields is established by regularization technology. Three typical forms of magnetic monopole arrays are established: rectangular magnetic monopole array on the horizontal surface of the draft line, cuboid magnetic monopole array enclosing the ship hull, three-dimensional ship magnetic monopole array distributed according to the ship’s ferromagnetic structure. The theoretical analysis shows that the three-dimensional ship magnetic monopole array reduces the blindness of the equivalent magnetic source setting, and the obtained equivalent magnetic source is highly consistent with the real magnetic source, which can reproduce the complete magnetic field information of the ship to a greater extent. The magnetic field of a typical virtual ship is applied to the validation test. The results show that the proposed three-dimensional ship magnetic monopole array has higher precision and adaptability than the rectangular or cuboid magnetic monopole array. In particular, the proposed three-dimensional ship magnetic monopole array can realize the mutual conversion between the near and far magnetic fields, and between the magnetic fields above and below the ship. The proposed three-dimensional ship magnetic monopole array model has the unique advantages of small complexity, simple modeling and flexible layout, and it provides an alternative method for the high-precision data processing and explanation to the inversion modeling of ship magnetic fields, ship magnetic field positioning, et al.
-
Keywords:
- magnetostatic field /
- equivalent source method /
- magnetic monopole /
- ship’s magnetic signature
[1] Holmes J J 2007 Modeling A Ship’s Ferromagnetic Signatures (Maryland: Morgan & Claypool Publishers) p3
[2] Holmes J J 2008 Reduction of a Ship’s Magnetic Field Signatures (Maryland: Morgan & Claypool Publishers) p8
[3] Nixon D A, Baker F E 1981 J. Appl. Phys. 52 539Google Scholar
[4] Kildishev A V, Nyenhuis J A, Morgan M A 2002 IEEE Trans. Magn. 38 2465Google Scholar
[5] 陈杰, 鲁习文 2009 物理学报 58 3839Google Scholar
Chen J, Lu X W 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 3839Google Scholar
[6] Synnes S A 2008 IEEE Trans. Magn. 44 2277Google Scholar
[7] Kamondetdacha R, Kildishev A V, Nyenhuis J A 2004 IE
EE Trans. Magn. 40 2176Google Scholar [8] 蒋敏志,林春生 2003 武汉理工大学学报·信息与管理工程版 25 168
Jiang M Z, Lin C S 2003 Journal of WUT (Information & Management Engineering)
25 168 [9] 隗燕琳, 陈敬超, 李贵乙, 王彦东, 曾小军 2017 计算机测量与控制 25 213
Wei Y L, Chen J C, Li G Y, Wang Y D, Zeng X J 2017 Computer Measurement & Control 25 213
[10] 林春生, 龚沈光 2007 舰船物理场(北京: 兵器工业出版社) p233
Lin C S, Gong S G 2007 Ships Physical Fields (Beijing: The Publishing House of Ordnance Industry) p233 (in Chinese)
[11] 戴忠华, 周穗华, 单珊 2018 电子学报 46 1524Google Scholar
Dai Z H, Zhou S H, Shan S 2018 Acta Electronica Sinica 46 1524Google Scholar
[12] 吴志东, 周穗华, 郭虎生 2013 武汉理工大学学报 35 67Google Scholar
Wu Z D, Zhou S H, Guo H S 2013 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology 35 67Google Scholar
[13] Alqadah H F, Valdivia N P, Williams E G 2016 Progress In Electromagnetics Research B 65 109Google Scholar
[14] Chadebec O, Coulomb J L, Bongiraud J P, Cauffet G, Thiec P L 2002 IEEE Trans. Magn. 38 1005Google Scholar
[15] Chadebec O, Couloumb J L, Cauffet G, Bongiraud J P 2003 IEEE Trans. Magn. 39 1634Google Scholar
[16] Vuillermet Y, Chadebec O, Coulomb J L, Rouve L L, Cauffet G, Bongiraud J P, Demilier L 2008 IEEE Trans. Magn. 44 1054Google Scholar
[17] Yang C S, Lee K J, Jung G, Chung H J, Park J S, Kim D H 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 103 07D905Google Scholar
[18] 郭成豹, 肖昌汉, 刘大明 2008 物理学报 57 4182Google Scholar
Guo C B, Xiao C H, Liu D M 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 4182Google Scholar
[19] Dirac P A M 1931 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 133 60Google Scholar
[20] Dirac P A M 1948 Phys. Rev. 74 817Google Scholar
[21] Tikhonov A N, Arsenin V Y 1977 Math. Comput. 32 491
[22] Hansen P C, O'Leary D P 1993 SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 14 1487Google Scholar
[23] 郭成豹, 周炜昶 2017 兵工学报 38 1988Google Scholar
Guo C B, Zhou W C 2017 Acta Armamentarii 38 1988Google Scholar
[24] 郭成豹, 刘大明 2012 兵工学报 33 912
Guo C B, Liu D M 2012 Acta Armamentarii 33 912
[25] 郭成豹, 刘大明 2014 兵工学报 35 1638Google Scholar
Guo C B, Liu D M 2014 Acta Armamentarii 35 1638Google Scholar
[26] Chadebec O, Coulomb J, Janet F 2006 IEEE Trans. Magn. 42 515Google Scholar
[27] Morandi A, Fabbri M, Ribani P L 2010 IEEE Trans. Magn. 46 3848Google Scholar
[28] Zhao K Z, Vouvakis M N, Lee J F 2005 IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 47 763Google Scholar
-
表 1 验证试验的计算结果
Table 1. Results of the validation test.
测量深度 阵列形式 正则化参数$\alpha$ 相对残差/% 相对误差/% +1B +2B +5B –2B –5B +1B 长方形 0.1323 4.65 4.56 8.25 28.23 95.00 101.76 长方体 0.0069 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.24 8.50 3.65 三维船体 0.0030 0.05 0.04 0.01 0.03 5.49 0.50 +2B 长方形 0.0177 2.15 13.28 2.14 10.03 91.06 85.98 长方体 0.0026 0.09 1.23 0.02 0.09 16.30 3.64 三维船体 0.0020 0.09 0.65 0.01 0.03 7.05 1.64 +5B 长方形 0.0190 3.64 34.51 19.15 3.62 80.15 78.21 长方体 0.0028 0.50 11.07 2.28 0.07 25.99 11.68 三维船体 0.0021 0.49 5.55 0.94 0.04 17.13 3.12 –2B 长方形 0.0020 1.54 190.80 114.68 92.25 1.54 6.62 长方体 0.0024 0.08 15.43 5.65 2.41 0.03 0.05 三维船体 0.0026 0.11 10.20 3.63 1.25 0.08 0.05 –5B 长方形 0.0216 4.39 90.31 86.81 86.29 29.79 4.39 长方体 0.0034 0.46 29.81 20.97 16.42 7.01 0.11 三维船体 0.0021 0.44 15.36 8.99 5.18 3.51 0.06 -
[1] Holmes J J 2007 Modeling A Ship’s Ferromagnetic Signatures (Maryland: Morgan & Claypool Publishers) p3
[2] Holmes J J 2008 Reduction of a Ship’s Magnetic Field Signatures (Maryland: Morgan & Claypool Publishers) p8
[3] Nixon D A, Baker F E 1981 J. Appl. Phys. 52 539Google Scholar
[4] Kildishev A V, Nyenhuis J A, Morgan M A 2002 IEEE Trans. Magn. 38 2465Google Scholar
[5] 陈杰, 鲁习文 2009 物理学报 58 3839Google Scholar
Chen J, Lu X W 2009 Acta Phys. Sin. 58 3839Google Scholar
[6] Synnes S A 2008 IEEE Trans. Magn. 44 2277Google Scholar
[7] Kamondetdacha R, Kildishev A V, Nyenhuis J A 2004 IE
EE Trans. Magn. 40 2176Google Scholar [8] 蒋敏志,林春生 2003 武汉理工大学学报·信息与管理工程版 25 168
Jiang M Z, Lin C S 2003 Journal of WUT (Information & Management Engineering)
25 168 [9] 隗燕琳, 陈敬超, 李贵乙, 王彦东, 曾小军 2017 计算机测量与控制 25 213
Wei Y L, Chen J C, Li G Y, Wang Y D, Zeng X J 2017 Computer Measurement & Control 25 213
[10] 林春生, 龚沈光 2007 舰船物理场(北京: 兵器工业出版社) p233
Lin C S, Gong S G 2007 Ships Physical Fields (Beijing: The Publishing House of Ordnance Industry) p233 (in Chinese)
[11] 戴忠华, 周穗华, 单珊 2018 电子学报 46 1524Google Scholar
Dai Z H, Zhou S H, Shan S 2018 Acta Electronica Sinica 46 1524Google Scholar
[12] 吴志东, 周穗华, 郭虎生 2013 武汉理工大学学报 35 67Google Scholar
Wu Z D, Zhou S H, Guo H S 2013 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology 35 67Google Scholar
[13] Alqadah H F, Valdivia N P, Williams E G 2016 Progress In Electromagnetics Research B 65 109Google Scholar
[14] Chadebec O, Coulomb J L, Bongiraud J P, Cauffet G, Thiec P L 2002 IEEE Trans. Magn. 38 1005Google Scholar
[15] Chadebec O, Couloumb J L, Cauffet G, Bongiraud J P 2003 IEEE Trans. Magn. 39 1634Google Scholar
[16] Vuillermet Y, Chadebec O, Coulomb J L, Rouve L L, Cauffet G, Bongiraud J P, Demilier L 2008 IEEE Trans. Magn. 44 1054Google Scholar
[17] Yang C S, Lee K J, Jung G, Chung H J, Park J S, Kim D H 2008 J. Appl. Phys. 103 07D905Google Scholar
[18] 郭成豹, 肖昌汉, 刘大明 2008 物理学报 57 4182Google Scholar
Guo C B, Xiao C H, Liu D M 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 4182Google Scholar
[19] Dirac P A M 1931 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 133 60Google Scholar
[20] Dirac P A M 1948 Phys. Rev. 74 817Google Scholar
[21] Tikhonov A N, Arsenin V Y 1977 Math. Comput. 32 491
[22] Hansen P C, O'Leary D P 1993 SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 14 1487Google Scholar
[23] 郭成豹, 周炜昶 2017 兵工学报 38 1988Google Scholar
Guo C B, Zhou W C 2017 Acta Armamentarii 38 1988Google Scholar
[24] 郭成豹, 刘大明 2012 兵工学报 33 912
Guo C B, Liu D M 2012 Acta Armamentarii 33 912
[25] 郭成豹, 刘大明 2014 兵工学报 35 1638Google Scholar
Guo C B, Liu D M 2014 Acta Armamentarii 35 1638Google Scholar
[26] Chadebec O, Coulomb J, Janet F 2006 IEEE Trans. Magn. 42 515Google Scholar
[27] Morandi A, Fabbri M, Ribani P L 2010 IEEE Trans. Magn. 46 3848Google Scholar
[28] Zhao K Z, Vouvakis M N, Lee J F 2005 IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 47 763Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 9653
- PDF Downloads: 97
- Cited By: 0