Research progress of hybrid cavity-magnon systems

Shen Rui-Chang; Zhang Guo-Qiang; Wang Yi-Pu; You Jian-Qiang

doi:10.7498/aps.68.20191608

Abstract

Recently, the hybrid cavity-magnon system has attracted considerable interest. Owing to the good tunability of magnons, it is promising to use the magnons as a core to implement a hybrid quantum platform for transferring information among different quantum systems. In this article, we first briefly review the cavity magnonic systems and clarify the coupling mechanism between magnons and microwave photons. Then, we introduce the latest research progress in the aspects of nonlinearity and pseudo-Hermiticity, including the bistability of cavity magnon polaritons, observation of the second-order exceptional point in a PT-symmetric hybrid cavity-magnon system, and the pseudo-Hermiticity with a third-order exceptional point.

Keywords:

hybrid cavity-magnon system /
cavity magon polariton /
Kerr effect and bistability /
pseudo-Hermiticity and exceptional point

Authors and contacts

1.
Quantum Physics and Quantum Information Division, Beijing Computational Science Research Center, Beijing 100193, China
2.
Department of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China

Corresponding author: You Jian-Qiang, jqyou@zju.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the State Key Development Program for Basic Research of China (Grant No. 2016 YFA0301200) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11934010, U1801661, U1930402)

FullText HTML

References

[1]	Shor P W 1994 Proceedings of 35 th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Scienece Los Alamitos, USA, November 22–24, 1994 p124
[2]	Grover L K 1996 Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing New York, USA, May 22–24, 1996 p212
[3]	Buluta I, Ashhab S, Nori F 2011 Rep. Prog. Phys. 74 104401 Google Scholar
[4]	Blatt R, Roos C F 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 277 Google Scholar
[5]	Hanson R, Kouwenhoven L P, Petta J R, Tarucha S, Vandersypen L M K 2007 Rev. Mod. Phys. 79 1217 Google Scholar
[6]	孔祥宇, 朱垣晔, 闻经纬, 新涛, 李可仁, 龙桂鲁 2018 物理学报 67 220301 Google Scholar Kong X Y, Zhu Y Y, Wen J W, Xin T, Li K R, Long G L 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 220301 Google Scholar
[7]	You J Q, Nori F 2005 Phys. Today 58 42
[8]	Devoret M H, Schoelkopf R J 2013 Science 339 1169 Google Scholar
[9]	You J Q, Hu X D, Ashhab S, Nori F 2007 Phys. Rev. B 75 140515 Google Scholar
[10]	Koch J, Yu T M, Gambetta J, Houck A A, Schuster D I, Majer J, Blais A, Devoret M H, Girvin S M, Schoelkopf R J 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 042319 Google Scholar
[11]	Barends R, Kelly J, Megrant A, Veitia A, Sank D, Jeffrey E, White T C, Mutus J, Fowler A G, Campbell B, Chen Y, Chen Z, Chiaro B, Dunsworth A, Neill C, O’Malley P, Roushan P, Vainsencher A, Wenner J, Korotkov A N, Cleland A N, Martinis J M 2014 Nature 508 500 Google Scholar
[12]	Feynman R P 1986 Found. Phys. 16 507 Google Scholar
[13]	Nielsen M A, Chuang I L 2001 Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (London: Cambridge University Press) p702
[14]	Ladd T D, Jelezko F, Laflamme R, Nakamura Y, Monroe C, O’Brien J L 2010 Nature 464 45 Google Scholar
[15]	Feynman R P 1982 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21 467 Google Scholar
[16]	Aspuru-Guzik A, Dutoi A D, Love P J, Head-Gordon M 2005 Science 309 1704 Google Scholar
[17]	Cirac J I, Zoller P 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 264 Google Scholar
[18]	Xiang Z L, Ashhab S, You J Q, Nori F 2013 Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 623 Google Scholar
[19]	Kurizkia G, Bertetb P, Kubob Y, Molmer K, Petrosyan D, Rabl P, Schmiedmayer J 2015 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112 3866 Google Scholar
[20]	Bienfait A, Pla J J, Kubo Y, Stern M, Zhou X, Lo C C, Weis C D, Schenkel T, Thewalt M L W, Vion D, Esteve D, Julsgaard B, Moelmer K, Morton J J L, Bertet P 2016 Nat. Nano 11 253
[21]	Raizen M G, Thompson R J, Brecha R J, Kimble H J, Carmichael H J 1989 Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 240 Google Scholar
[22]	Soykal Ö O, Flatté M E 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 077202
[23]	Soykal Ö O, Flatté M E 2010 Phys. Rev. B 82 104413 Google Scholar
[24]	Huebl H, Zollitsch C W, Lotze J, Hocke F, Greifenstein M, Marx A, Gross R, Goennenwein S T B 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 127003 Google Scholar
[25]	Zhang X, Zou C L, Jiang L, Tang H X 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 156401 Google Scholar
[26]	Tabuchi Y, Ishino S, Ishikawa T, Yamazaki R, Usami K, Nakamura Y 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 083603 Google Scholar
[27]	Zhang D K, Wang X M, Li T F, Luo X Q, Wu W D, Nori F, You J Q 2015 NPJ Quantum Inf. 1 15014 Google Scholar
[28]	Bai L H, Harder M, Chen Y P, Fan X, Xiao J Q, Hu C M 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 227201 Google Scholar
[29]	Haigh J A, Langenfeld S, Lambert N J, Baumberg J J, Ramsay A J, Nunnenkamp A, Ferguson A J 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 063845 Google Scholar
[30]	Tabuchi Y, Ishino S, Noguchi A, Ishikawa T, Yamazaki R, Usami K, Nakamura Y 2015 Science 349 405 Google Scholar
[31]	Quirion D L, Tabuchi Y, Ishino S, Noguchi A, Ishikawa T, Yamazaki R, Nakamura Y 2017 Sci. Adv. 3 e1603150 Google Scholar
[32]	Zhang X F, Zou C L, Jiang L, Tang H X 2016 Sci. Adv. 2 e1501286 Google Scholar
[33]	Harder M, Yang Y, Yao B M, Yu C H, Rao J W, Gui Y S, Stamps R L, Hu C M 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 137203
[34]	Grigoryan V L, Shen K, Xia K 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 024406 Google Scholar
[35]	Xu P C, Rao J W, Gui Y S, Jin X, Hu C M 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 094415 Google Scholar
[36]	Yu W C, Wang J J, Yuan H Y, Xiao J 2019 arXiv: 1907.06222 v2 [cond-mat. mes-hall]
[37]	Yuan H Y, Peng Y P, Zheng S S, He Q Y, Xia K, Yung M H 2019 arXiv: 1905.11117 v1 [cond-mat. mes-hall]
[38]	Wang Y P, Rao J W, Yang Y, Xu P C, Gui Y S, Yao B M, You J Q, Hu C M 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 127202 Google Scholar
[39]	Quirion D L, Tabuchi Y, Gloppe A, Usami K, Nakamura Y 2019 Appl. Phys. Express 12 070101 Google Scholar
[40]	Wang Y P, Zhang G Q, Zhang D K, Luo X Q, Xiong W, Wang S P, Li T F, Hu C M, You J Q 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94 224410 Google Scholar
[41]	Wang Y P, Zhang G Q, Zhang D K, Li T F, Hu C M, You J Q 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 057202 Google Scholar
[42]	Zhang D K, Luo X Q, Wang Y P, Li T F, You J Q 2017 Nat. Com. 8 1368 Google Scholar
[43]	Zhang G Q, You J Q 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 054404 Google Scholar
[44]	Holstein T, Primakoff H 1940 Phys. Rev. 58 1098 Google Scholar
[45]	Kostylev N, Goryachev M, Tobar M E 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 062402 Google Scholar
[46]	Rezende S M, de Aguiar F M 1990 Proc. IEEE 78 893 Google Scholar
[47]	Zhang G Q, Wang Y P, You J Q 2019 Sci. China: Phys. Mech. Astron. 62 987511 Google Scholar
[48]	Bogoliubov N N 1958 Phys. Today 34 1
[49]	Harder M, Bai L H, Match C, Sirker J, Hu C M 2016 Sci. China: Phys. Mech. Astron. 59 117511 Google Scholar
[50]	Bender C M, Boettcher S 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 5243 Google Scholar
[51]	Konotop V V, Yang J, Zezyulin D A 2016 Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 035002 Google Scholar
[52]	Mostafazadeh A 2002 J. Math. Phys. 43 205 Google Scholar
[53]	Mostafazadeh A 2002 J. Math. Phys. 43 2814 Google Scholar
[54]	Grigoryan V L, Xia K 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 224408 Google Scholar
[55]	Cao Y S, Yan P 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 214415 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 YIG小球和三维微波腔耦合系统示意图及腔内磁场分布模拟图^[41]

Figure 1. Schematic of YIG sphere and three-dimensional microwave cavity coupling system and the simulation of magnetic field distribution in cavity^[41].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 自旋波模和腔模共振时下支极化激元的频率移动随驱动功率变化情况　(a)偏置磁场沿晶轴[100]的情况; (b)偏置磁场沿晶轴[110]的情况^[41]

Figure 2. When the magnon resonated with the cavity mode, the curves of the frequency shift of the lower-branch cavity magnon polaritons ${\varDelta _{{\rm{LP}}}}$ versus the driving power${P_{\rm{d}}}$: (a) The bias magnetic field is along the crystal axis [100]; (b) the bias magnetic field is along the crystal axis [110]^[41].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 赝厄米哈密顿量、PT对称哈密顿量和厄米哈密顿量之间关系示意图

Figure 3. Relationship between the pseudo-Hermitian, the PT-symmetric Hamiltonian and the Hermitian Hamiltonian.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 PT对称系统示意图　(a)实验装置示意图; (b)腔TE₁₀₁模和TE₁₀₂模磁场分布模拟图^[42]

Figure 4. Schematic of PT-symmetrical system: (a) The schematic of experimental device; (b) the simulation of cavity mode ${\rm{T}}{{\rm{E}}_{101}}$ and ${\rm{T}}{{\rm{E}}_{102}}$^[42].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 PT对称系统中总传输谱${\left| {{S_{{\rm{tot}}}}\left( \omega \right)} \right|^2}$随YIG小球位置x以及输入场频率$\omega $的变化情况　(a)理论模拟结果; (b)实验结果^[42]

Figure 5. The total transmission spectrum ${\left| {{S_{{\rm{tot}}}}\left( \omega \right)} \right|^2}$ versus the position of YIG sphere $x$ and the frequency of input field $\omega $: (a) The theoretical simulation results; (b) the experimental results^[42].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 赝厄米系统示意图和理论结果模拟图^[47]　(a)赝厄米系统示意图; (b)理论模拟总传输谱${\left| {{S_{{\rm{tot}}}}\left( \omega \right)} \right|^2}$随耦合强度${g_1}$以及输入场和腔模之间的频率失谐量$\omega - {\omega _{\rm{c}}}$的变化情况

Figure 6. The system schematic and the simulation of theoretical results of pseudo-Hermitian system^[47]: (a) The schematic of pseudo-Hermitian system; (b) the total transmission spectrum ${\left| {{S_{{\rm{tot}}}}\left( \omega \right)} \right|^2}$ versus the coupling strength ${g_1}$ and the frequency detuning between the input field and the cavity mode $\omega - {\omega _{\rm{c}}}$.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

[1]	Shor P W 1994 Proceedings of 35 th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Scienece Los Alamitos, USA, November 22–24, 1994 p124
[2]	Grover L K 1996 Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing New York, USA, May 22–24, 1996 p212
[3]	Buluta I, Ashhab S, Nori F 2011 Rep. Prog. Phys. 74 104401 Google Scholar
[4]	Blatt R, Roos C F 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 277 Google Scholar
[5]	Hanson R, Kouwenhoven L P, Petta J R, Tarucha S, Vandersypen L M K 2007 Rev. Mod. Phys. 79 1217 Google Scholar
[6]	孔祥宇, 朱垣晔, 闻经纬, 新涛, 李可仁, 龙桂鲁 2018 物理学报 67 220301 Google Scholar Kong X Y, Zhu Y Y, Wen J W, Xin T, Li K R, Long G L 2018 Acta Phys. Sin. 67 220301 Google Scholar
[7]	You J Q, Nori F 2005 Phys. Today 58 42
[8]	Devoret M H, Schoelkopf R J 2013 Science 339 1169 Google Scholar
[9]	You J Q, Hu X D, Ashhab S, Nori F 2007 Phys. Rev. B 75 140515 Google Scholar
[10]	Koch J, Yu T M, Gambetta J, Houck A A, Schuster D I, Majer J, Blais A, Devoret M H, Girvin S M, Schoelkopf R J 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 042319 Google Scholar
[11]	Barends R, Kelly J, Megrant A, Veitia A, Sank D, Jeffrey E, White T C, Mutus J, Fowler A G, Campbell B, Chen Y, Chen Z, Chiaro B, Dunsworth A, Neill C, O’Malley P, Roushan P, Vainsencher A, Wenner J, Korotkov A N, Cleland A N, Martinis J M 2014 Nature 508 500 Google Scholar
[12]	Feynman R P 1986 Found. Phys. 16 507 Google Scholar
[13]	Nielsen M A, Chuang I L 2001 Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (London: Cambridge University Press) p702
[14]	Ladd T D, Jelezko F, Laflamme R, Nakamura Y, Monroe C, O’Brien J L 2010 Nature 464 45 Google Scholar
[15]	Feynman R P 1982 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21 467 Google Scholar
[16]	Aspuru-Guzik A, Dutoi A D, Love P J, Head-Gordon M 2005 Science 309 1704 Google Scholar
[17]	Cirac J I, Zoller P 2012 Nat. Phys. 8 264 Google Scholar
[18]	Xiang Z L, Ashhab S, You J Q, Nori F 2013 Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 623 Google Scholar
[19]	Kurizkia G, Bertetb P, Kubob Y, Molmer K, Petrosyan D, Rabl P, Schmiedmayer J 2015 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112 3866 Google Scholar
[20]	Bienfait A, Pla J J, Kubo Y, Stern M, Zhou X, Lo C C, Weis C D, Schenkel T, Thewalt M L W, Vion D, Esteve D, Julsgaard B, Moelmer K, Morton J J L, Bertet P 2016 Nat. Nano 11 253
[21]	Raizen M G, Thompson R J, Brecha R J, Kimble H J, Carmichael H J 1989 Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 240 Google Scholar
[22]	Soykal Ö O, Flatté M E 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 077202
[23]	Soykal Ö O, Flatté M E 2010 Phys. Rev. B 82 104413 Google Scholar
[24]	Huebl H, Zollitsch C W, Lotze J, Hocke F, Greifenstein M, Marx A, Gross R, Goennenwein S T B 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 127003 Google Scholar
[25]	Zhang X, Zou C L, Jiang L, Tang H X 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 156401 Google Scholar
[26]	Tabuchi Y, Ishino S, Ishikawa T, Yamazaki R, Usami K, Nakamura Y 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 083603 Google Scholar
[27]	Zhang D K, Wang X M, Li T F, Luo X Q, Wu W D, Nori F, You J Q 2015 NPJ Quantum Inf. 1 15014 Google Scholar
[28]	Bai L H, Harder M, Chen Y P, Fan X, Xiao J Q, Hu C M 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 227201 Google Scholar
[29]	Haigh J A, Langenfeld S, Lambert N J, Baumberg J J, Ramsay A J, Nunnenkamp A, Ferguson A J 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 063845 Google Scholar
[30]	Tabuchi Y, Ishino S, Noguchi A, Ishikawa T, Yamazaki R, Usami K, Nakamura Y 2015 Science 349 405 Google Scholar
[31]	Quirion D L, Tabuchi Y, Ishino S, Noguchi A, Ishikawa T, Yamazaki R, Nakamura Y 2017 Sci. Adv. 3 e1603150 Google Scholar
[32]	Zhang X F, Zou C L, Jiang L, Tang H X 2016 Sci. Adv. 2 e1501286 Google Scholar
[33]	Harder M, Yang Y, Yao B M, Yu C H, Rao J W, Gui Y S, Stamps R L, Hu C M 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 137203
[34]	Grigoryan V L, Shen K, Xia K 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 024406 Google Scholar
[35]	Xu P C, Rao J W, Gui Y S, Jin X, Hu C M 2019 Phys. Rev. B 100 094415 Google Scholar
[36]	Yu W C, Wang J J, Yuan H Y, Xiao J 2019 arXiv: 1907.06222 v2 [cond-mat. mes-hall]
[37]	Yuan H Y, Peng Y P, Zheng S S, He Q Y, Xia K, Yung M H 2019 arXiv: 1905.11117 v1 [cond-mat. mes-hall]
[38]	Wang Y P, Rao J W, Yang Y, Xu P C, Gui Y S, Yao B M, You J Q, Hu C M 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 127202 Google Scholar
[39]	Quirion D L, Tabuchi Y, Gloppe A, Usami K, Nakamura Y 2019 Appl. Phys. Express 12 070101 Google Scholar
[40]	Wang Y P, Zhang G Q, Zhang D K, Luo X Q, Xiong W, Wang S P, Li T F, Hu C M, You J Q 2016 Phys. Rev. B 94 224410 Google Scholar
[41]	Wang Y P, Zhang G Q, Zhang D K, Li T F, Hu C M, You J Q 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 057202 Google Scholar
[42]	Zhang D K, Luo X Q, Wang Y P, Li T F, You J Q 2017 Nat. Com. 8 1368 Google Scholar
[43]	Zhang G Q, You J Q 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 054404 Google Scholar
[44]	Holstein T, Primakoff H 1940 Phys. Rev. 58 1098 Google Scholar
[45]	Kostylev N, Goryachev M, Tobar M E 2016 Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 062402 Google Scholar
[46]	Rezende S M, de Aguiar F M 1990 Proc. IEEE 78 893 Google Scholar
[47]	Zhang G Q, Wang Y P, You J Q 2019 Sci. China: Phys. Mech. Astron. 62 987511 Google Scholar
[48]	Bogoliubov N N 1958 Phys. Today 34 1
[49]	Harder M, Bai L H, Match C, Sirker J, Hu C M 2016 Sci. China: Phys. Mech. Astron. 59 117511 Google Scholar
[50]	Bender C M, Boettcher S 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 5243 Google Scholar
[51]	Konotop V V, Yang J, Zezyulin D A 2016 Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 035002 Google Scholar
[52]	Mostafazadeh A 2002 J. Math. Phys. 43 205 Google Scholar
[53]	Mostafazadeh A 2002 J. Math. Phys. 43 2814 Google Scholar
[54]	Grigoryan V L, Xia K 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 224408 Google Scholar
[55]	Cao Y S, Yan P 2019 Phys. Rev. B 99 214415 Google Scholar

[1]	ZHANG Zhiqiang. Photon blockade effect from synergistic optical parametric amplification and driving force in Kerr-medium single-mode cavity. Acta Physica Sinica, 2025, 74(16): 164205. doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20250712
[2]	YANG Xing, LIU Mengjiao, HOU Jiahao, LI Tianyue, WANG Shuming. Topological selective non Hermitian skin effect. Acta Physica Sinica, 2025, 74(14): 144205. doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20250526
[3]	BAI Long, ZHANG Rong, ZHANG Lei. Thermoelectric transport of normal metal-double quantum dots-superconductor hybrid system with spin-orbit coupling. Acta Physica Sinica, 2025, 74(10): 107301. doi: 10.7498/aps.74.20241756
[4]	Hou Lei, Guan Shu-Yang, Yin Jun, Zhang Yu-Jun, Xiao Yi-Ming, Xu Wen, Ding Lan. High-order cavity coupled plasmon polaritons in resonant cavity-monolayer MoS₂ system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(22): 227102. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20241106
[5]	Li Jing, Ding Hai-Tao, Zhang Dan-Wei. Quantum Fisher information and parameter estimation in non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(20): 200601. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230862
[6]	Zhang Xi-Zheng, Wang Peng, Zhang Kun-Liang, Yang Xue-Min, Song Zhi. Non-Hermitian critical dynamics and its application to quantum many-body systems. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(17): 174501. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220914
[7]	Gao Xue-Er, Li Dai-Li, Liu Zhi-Hang, Zheng Chao. Recent progress of quantum simulation of non-Hermitian systems. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(24): 240303. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221825
[8]	Deng Tian-Shu. Non-Hermitian skin effect in a domain-wall system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(17): 170306. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20221087
[9]	Zhu Ke-Jia, Guo Zhi-Wei, Chen Hong. Experimental observation of chiral inversion at exceptional points of non-Hermitian systems. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(13): 131101. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220842
[10]	Zhang Gao-Jian, Wang Yi-Pu. Observation of the anisotropic exceptional point in cavity magnonics system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(4): 047103. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20191632
[11]	Yang Yang, Wang An-Min, Cao Lian-Zhen, Zhao Jia-Qiang, Lu Huai-Xin. Correlation and coherence for two-qubit system coupled to XY spin chains. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(15): 150302. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180812
[12]	Li Xue-Qin, Zhao Yun-Fang, Tang Yan-Ni, Yang Wei-Jun. Entanglement of quantum node based on hybrid system of diamond nitrogen-vacancy center spin ensembles and superconducting quantum circuits. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(7): 070302. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172634
[13]	Zheng Jun, Li Chun-Lei, Yang Xi, Guo Yong. Spin and charge Nernst effect in a four-terminal double quantum dot system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(9): 097302. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.097302
[14]	Fang Shao-Yin, Lu Hai-Ming, Lai Tian-Shu. Effects of spin polarization on absorption saturation and recombination dynamics of carriers in (001) GaAs quantum wells. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(15): 157201. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.157201
[15]	An Xing-Tao, Mu Hui-Ying, Xian Li-Fen, Liu Jian-Jun. Spin-polarized transport through double quantum-dot-array. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(15): 157201. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.157201
[16]	Chen Xiang, Mi Xian-Wu. Studys of characteristics for pump-induced emission and anharmonic cavity-QED in quantum dot-cavity systems. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(4): 044202. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.044202
[17]	Pan Jing, Zhou Lan, Hu Jing-Guo. The magnetization of antiferrmagnetic layer and the spin wave in the system of the exchange bias. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(9): 6487-6493. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.6487
[18]	Li Xiao-Qi, Wang Jian, Wang Fei, Hu Xiang-Ming. Microwave control of optical bistability and multistability in the presence of antirotating wave coupling. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(4): 2236-2241. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.2236
[19]	S. SACHUIF, HU GANG. THE ATOM SQUEEZING EFFECT FOR OFF-RESONANT TWO-PHOTON OPTICAL BISTABILITY IN BAD-CAVITY CASE. Acta Physica Sinica, 1992, 41(4): 578-586. doi: 10.7498/aps.41.578
[20]	ZHANG LIN, LIN REN-MING. MULTI-PHOTON SQUEEZING EFFECT FOR THE MIXED ABSORPTIVE-DISPERSIVE DRIVEN OPTICAL SYSTEM IN GOOD CAVITY CASE. Acta Physica Sinica, 1990, 39(11): 1714-1720. doi: 10.7498/aps.39.1714

Catalog

Vol. 68, Issue 23 - 2019-12-05

Metrics

Abstract views: 11396
PDF Downloads: 282
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板