-
The contacts between semiconductor and metal are vital in the fabrication of nano electronic and optoelectronic devices. The contact type has a great influence on the function realization and performance of the device. In order to prepare multifunctional devices with high performance, it is necessary to modulate the barrier height and contact type at the interface. First-principles calculations based on the density functional theory (DFT) are implemented in the VASP package. The generalized gradient approximation of Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (GGA-PBE) with van der Waals (vdW) correction proposed by Grimme (DFT-D3) is chosen due to its good description of long-range vdW interactions. It is demonstrated that weak vdW interactions dominate between graphene and InSe with their intrinsic electronic properties preserved. We find that the n-type ohmic contact is formed at the graphene/InSe interface with the Fermi level through the conduction band of InSe (ΦBn < 0). The Fermi level of graphene/InSe heterostructure moves down to below the Dirac point of graphene layer, which results in p-type (hole) doping in graphene. Moreover, the external electric field is effective to tune the Schottky barrier, which can control not only the Schottky barrier height but also the type of contact. With the negative external electric field varying from 0 to –1 V/nm, the conduction band minimum of InSe below the Fermi level declines gradually but the n-type ohmic contact is still preserved. Nevertheless, with the positive external electric field varying from 0 to 0.8 V/nm, the conduction band minimum of InSe shifts upward and across the Fermi level, the conduction band minimum of InSe is closer to the Fermi level than the valence band maximum, which indicates that the n-type Schottky contact is formed. The Fermi level moves from the the conduction band minimum to the valence band maximum of InSe when the positive external electric field increases from 0.8 V/nm to 2 V/nm. The n-type Schottky barrier height exceeds the p-type Schottky barrier height gradually, which demonstrates that the positive external electric field transforms the n-type Schottky contact into the p-type Schottky contact at the graphene/InSe interface. When the positive external electric field exceeds 2 V/nm, the valence band of InSe moves upward and cross the Fermi level (ΦBp < 0), the ohmic contact is obtained again. Meanwhile, p-type (hole) doping in graphene is enhanced under negative external electric field and a large positive external electric field is required to achieve n-type (electron) doping in graphene. The external electric field can control not only the amount of charge transfer but also the direction of charge transfer at the graphene/InSe interface.
[1] Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, et al. 2004 Science 306 666Google Scholar
[2] Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, et al. 2005 Nature 438 197Google Scholar
[3] Neto A C, Guinea F, Peres N M, Novoselov K S, Geim A K 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 109Google Scholar
[4] Tang Q, Zhou Z 2013 Prog. Mater. Sci. 58 1244Google Scholar
[5] Schwierz F 2010 Nat. Nanotechnol. 5 487Google Scholar
[6] Balog R, Jørgensen B, Nilsson L, et al. 2010 Nat. Mater. 9 315Google Scholar
[7] Han M Y, Ozyilmaz B, Zhang Y, Kim P 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 206805Google Scholar
[8] Huang L, Huo N J, Li Y, Chen H, Yang J H, Wei Z M, Li J B, Li S S 2015 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6 2483Google Scholar
[9] Kang J, Sahin H, Peeters F M 2015 J. Phys. Chem. C 119 9580Google Scholar
[10] Yu J H, Lee H R, Hong S S, Kong D S, Lee H W, Wang H T, Xiong F, Wang S, Cui Y 2015 Nano Lett. 15 1031Google Scholar
[11] Xiang Q J, Yu J G, Jaroniec M 2011 J. Phys. Chem. C 115 7355Google Scholar
[12] Li X H, Chen J S, Wang X, Sun J, Antonietti M 2011 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 8074Google Scholar
[13] Du A, Sanvito S, Li Z, et al. 2012 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 4393Google Scholar
[14] Dean C R, Young A F, Meric I, et al. 2010 Nat. Nanotechnol. 5 722Google Scholar
[15] Xue J, Sanchez-Yamagishi J, Bulmash D, et al. 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 282Google Scholar
[16] Sławin′ska J, Zasada I, Klusek Z 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 155433Google Scholar
[17] Lin X, Xu Y, Hakro A A, Hasan T, Hao R, Zhang B, Chen H 2013 J. Mater. Chem. C 1 1618Google Scholar
[18] Ma Y, Dai Y, Guo M, Niu C, Huang B 2011 Nanoscale 3 3883Google Scholar
[19] Li X D, Yu S, Wu S Q, Wen Y H, Zhou S, Zhu Z Z 2013 J. Phys. Chem. C 117 15347Google Scholar
[20] Britnell L, Ribeiro R M, Eckmann A, et al. 2013 Science 340 1311Google Scholar
[21] Tian H, Tan Z, Wu C, et al. 2014 Sci. Rep. 4 5951
[22] Tung R 2014 Appl. Phys. Rev. 1 011304Google Scholar
[23] Mudd G, Patane A, Kudrynskyi Z, et al. 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 221909Google Scholar
[24] Wu M, Shi J, Zhang M, Ding Y, Wang H, Cen Y, Lu J 2018 Nanoscale 10 11441Google Scholar
[25] Ho P H, Chang Y R, Chu Y C, Li M K, Tsai C A, Wang W H, Ho C H, Chen C W, Chiu P W 2017 ACS Nano 11 7362Google Scholar
[26] Tamalampudi S, Lu Y, Kumar U, Sankar R, Liao C, Moorthy B, Cheng C, Chou F, Chen Y 2014 Nano Lett. 14 2800Google Scholar
[27] Lei S, Ge L, Najmaei S, et al. 2014 ACS Nano 8 1263Google Scholar
[28] Sun C, Xiang H, Xu B, Xia Y, Yin J, Liu Z 2016 Appl. Phys. Express 9 035203Google Scholar
[29] Bandurin D A, Tyurnina A V, Yu G L, et al. 2017 Nat. Nanotechnol. 12 223Google Scholar
[30] Feng W, Zheng W, Cao W, Hu P 2014 Adv. Mater. 26 6587Google Scholar
[31] Padilha J E, Miwa R H, Silva A J R, Fazzio A 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95 195143Google Scholar
[32] Yan F, Zhao L, Patane A, Hu P, Wei X, Luo W, Zhang D, Lv Q, Feng Q, Shen C, Chang K, Eaves L, Wang K 2017 Nanotechnology 28 27LT01Google Scholar
[33] Mudd G W, Svatek S A, Hague L, et al. 2015 Adv. Mater. 27 3760Google Scholar
[34] Blöchl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953Google Scholar
[35] Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169Google Scholar
[36] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865Google Scholar
[37] Grimme S 2006 J. Comput. Chem. 27 1787Google Scholar
[38] Singh S, Espejo C, Romero A 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 155309Google Scholar
[39] Woessner A, Lundeberg M B, Gao Y, et al. 2015 Nat. Mater. 14 421Google Scholar
[40] Zhuang H L, Hennig R G 2013 Chem. Mater. 25 3232Google Scholar
[41] Sun M, Chou J P, Yu J, Tang W 2017 J. Mater. Chem. C 5 10383Google Scholar
-
图 3 (a) Graphene/InSe异质结的投影能带结构图, 红色线条表示graphene的能带, 蓝色线条表示InSe的能带; (b) graphene的能带结构图; (c)单层InSe的能带结构图; 费米能级设为零点
Figure 3. (a) Projected band structure of the graphene/InSe heterostructure, where the red and blue lines represent for the energy band of graphene and InSe, respectively; (b) the band structure of graphene; (c) the band structure of monolayer InSe. The Fermi level is set to zero.
图 5 施加不同外电场时graphene/InSe异质结的投影能带图, 图中蓝色线条表示InSe的能带, 红色线条表示graphene的能带, 费米能级设为零点
Figure 5. Projected band structures of graphene/InSe heterostructures under different external electric fields. The red and blue lines represent for the energy band of graphene and InSe, respectively. The Fermi level is set to zero.
图 7 (a) 施加正外电场时graphene/InSe异质结的平面平均差分电荷密度图; (b) 施加负外电场时graphene/InSe异质结的平面平均差分电荷密度图; 图中的竖直黑色虚线表示graphene层和InSe层的分界线
Figure 7. (a) Plane-averaged charge density difference of the graphene/InSe heterostructure under positive external electric fields; (b) the plane-averaged charge density difference of the graphene/InSe heterostructure under negative external electric fields. The black vertical dashed line denotes the intermediate position of graphene and InSe.
-
[1] Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, et al. 2004 Science 306 666Google Scholar
[2] Novoselov K S, Geim A K, Morozov S V, et al. 2005 Nature 438 197Google Scholar
[3] Neto A C, Guinea F, Peres N M, Novoselov K S, Geim A K 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 109Google Scholar
[4] Tang Q, Zhou Z 2013 Prog. Mater. Sci. 58 1244Google Scholar
[5] Schwierz F 2010 Nat. Nanotechnol. 5 487Google Scholar
[6] Balog R, Jørgensen B, Nilsson L, et al. 2010 Nat. Mater. 9 315Google Scholar
[7] Han M Y, Ozyilmaz B, Zhang Y, Kim P 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 206805Google Scholar
[8] Huang L, Huo N J, Li Y, Chen H, Yang J H, Wei Z M, Li J B, Li S S 2015 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6 2483Google Scholar
[9] Kang J, Sahin H, Peeters F M 2015 J. Phys. Chem. C 119 9580Google Scholar
[10] Yu J H, Lee H R, Hong S S, Kong D S, Lee H W, Wang H T, Xiong F, Wang S, Cui Y 2015 Nano Lett. 15 1031Google Scholar
[11] Xiang Q J, Yu J G, Jaroniec M 2011 J. Phys. Chem. C 115 7355Google Scholar
[12] Li X H, Chen J S, Wang X, Sun J, Antonietti M 2011 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 8074Google Scholar
[13] Du A, Sanvito S, Li Z, et al. 2012 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 4393Google Scholar
[14] Dean C R, Young A F, Meric I, et al. 2010 Nat. Nanotechnol. 5 722Google Scholar
[15] Xue J, Sanchez-Yamagishi J, Bulmash D, et al. 2011 Nat. Mater. 10 282Google Scholar
[16] Sławin′ska J, Zasada I, Klusek Z 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 155433Google Scholar
[17] Lin X, Xu Y, Hakro A A, Hasan T, Hao R, Zhang B, Chen H 2013 J. Mater. Chem. C 1 1618Google Scholar
[18] Ma Y, Dai Y, Guo M, Niu C, Huang B 2011 Nanoscale 3 3883Google Scholar
[19] Li X D, Yu S, Wu S Q, Wen Y H, Zhou S, Zhu Z Z 2013 J. Phys. Chem. C 117 15347Google Scholar
[20] Britnell L, Ribeiro R M, Eckmann A, et al. 2013 Science 340 1311Google Scholar
[21] Tian H, Tan Z, Wu C, et al. 2014 Sci. Rep. 4 5951
[22] Tung R 2014 Appl. Phys. Rev. 1 011304Google Scholar
[23] Mudd G, Patane A, Kudrynskyi Z, et al. 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 221909Google Scholar
[24] Wu M, Shi J, Zhang M, Ding Y, Wang H, Cen Y, Lu J 2018 Nanoscale 10 11441Google Scholar
[25] Ho P H, Chang Y R, Chu Y C, Li M K, Tsai C A, Wang W H, Ho C H, Chen C W, Chiu P W 2017 ACS Nano 11 7362Google Scholar
[26] Tamalampudi S, Lu Y, Kumar U, Sankar R, Liao C, Moorthy B, Cheng C, Chou F, Chen Y 2014 Nano Lett. 14 2800Google Scholar
[27] Lei S, Ge L, Najmaei S, et al. 2014 ACS Nano 8 1263Google Scholar
[28] Sun C, Xiang H, Xu B, Xia Y, Yin J, Liu Z 2016 Appl. Phys. Express 9 035203Google Scholar
[29] Bandurin D A, Tyurnina A V, Yu G L, et al. 2017 Nat. Nanotechnol. 12 223Google Scholar
[30] Feng W, Zheng W, Cao W, Hu P 2014 Adv. Mater. 26 6587Google Scholar
[31] Padilha J E, Miwa R H, Silva A J R, Fazzio A 2017 Phys. Rev. B 95 195143Google Scholar
[32] Yan F, Zhao L, Patane A, Hu P, Wei X, Luo W, Zhang D, Lv Q, Feng Q, Shen C, Chang K, Eaves L, Wang K 2017 Nanotechnology 28 27LT01Google Scholar
[33] Mudd G W, Svatek S A, Hague L, et al. 2015 Adv. Mater. 27 3760Google Scholar
[34] Blöchl P E 1994 Phys. Rev. B 50 17953Google Scholar
[35] Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169Google Scholar
[36] Perdew J P, Burke K, Ernzerhof M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3865Google Scholar
[37] Grimme S 2006 J. Comput. Chem. 27 1787Google Scholar
[38] Singh S, Espejo C, Romero A 2018 Phys. Rev. B 98 155309Google Scholar
[39] Woessner A, Lundeberg M B, Gao Y, et al. 2015 Nat. Mater. 14 421Google Scholar
[40] Zhuang H L, Hennig R G 2013 Chem. Mater. 25 3232Google Scholar
[41] Sun M, Chou J P, Yu J, Tang W 2017 J. Mater. Chem. C 5 10383Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 11372
- PDF Downloads: 355
- Cited By: 0