-
Beam arrangement with limited projections is a critical part of research on tunable diode laser absorption tomography reconstruction for combustion diagnosis. Based on the efforts to regularize this rank-deficient and ill-posed problem with Tikhonov regularization, a novel approach to using the regularization parameter matrix is developed for designing optical component layout and predicting the reconstruction accuracy. Objective function of beam arrangement is established by the rigorous mathematical derivation, and genetic algorithm is adopted to realize the optimization of function to overcome the difficulty associated with the multimodal nature of the problem. Nonuniform distribution properties of matrix elements in physical space relate to location and alignment of the laser/detector pairs, and form a basis for adjusting the weight between measurement and regularization to improve the reconstruction performance. A mathematical model of double Gauss distributions is established in a 10 × 10 element discrete tomography domain, and typically 20 measurement beams scanning the H2O transition at 7185.6 cm–1 are available to probe the domain of interest. The systematic comparison between optimized beam array here and four existing beam arrangements in the literature is analyzed to validate the method. The reconstruction with Tikhonov regularization parameter matrix shows obvious advantages of reducing errors especially under the condition of fewer projections. The validation of reconstruction performance of the optimized beam array is also examined by simulating the laser absorption measurement which is carried out on phantoms generated using a simulation of external flow field of an air-gasoline pulsed detonation engine. The result shows that the optimized beam array consistently outperforms other arrangements reported in complicated fluid field. A demonstration reconstruction experiment is performed on the distribution from small gas burners. Both locations and amplitudes are in good agreement with those in the actual case. This proposed design method will be valuable in broadening the scope of applications of tunable diode laser absorption tomography reconstruction for engine diagnosis and combustion efficiency improvement.
-
Keywords:
- laser absorption spectroscopy /
- tomography reconstruction /
- Tikhonov regularization /
- singular value decomposition
[1] Jatana G, Geckler S, Koeberlein D, Partridge W 2017 Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 240 1197Google Scholar
[2] Kamimoto T, Deguchi Y, Shisawa Y, Kitauchi Y, Eto Y 2016 Appl. Therm. Eng. 102 596Google Scholar
[3] Wood M P, Ozanyan K B 2015 IEEE Sens. J. 15 545Google Scholar
[4] Goldenstein C S, Spearrin R M, Jeffries J B, Hanson R K 2014 Appl. Phys. B 116 705Google Scholar
[5] Strand C L, Hanson R K 2015 AIAA 53 2978Google Scholar
[6] Tsekenis S A, Wilson D, Lengden M, Hyvonen J, Leinonen J, Shah A, Andersson O, McCann H 2017 Flow Meas. Instrum. 53 116Google Scholar
[7] Tsekenis S A, Polydorides, N 2017 IEEE Sens. J. 17 8072Google Scholar
[8] Xu L J, Liu C, Jing W Y, Cao Z, Xue X, Lin Y Z 2016 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87 013101Google Scholar
[9] Cai W W, Kaminski C F 2017 Prog. Energy Combust.Sci. 59 1Google Scholar
[10] Liu C, Xu L J, Chen J L, Cao Z, Lin Y Z, Cai WW 2015 Opt. Express 23 22494Google Scholar
[11] Wang F, Wu Q, Huang Q X, Zhang H D, Yan J H, Cen K F 2015 Opt. Commun. 346 53Google Scholar
[12] Xia H H, Kan R F, Xu Z Y, He Y B, Liu J G, Chen B, Yang C G, Yao L, Wei M, Zhang G L 2017 Opt. Laser Eng. 90 10Google Scholar
[13] Cai W W, Ewing D J, Ma L 2008 Comput. Phys. Commun. 179 250Google Scholar
[14] Cai W W, Ewing D J, Ma L 2011 Appl.Math. Comput. 217 5754Google Scholar
[15] Terzija N, Davidson J L, Garciastewart C A, Wright P, Ozanyan K B, Pegrum S, Litt T J, Mccann H 2009 Meas. Sci.Technol. 19 094007Google Scholar
[16] Song J L, Hong Y J, Pan H, Wang G Y 2013 Proceedings of 5th International Symposium on Photoelectronic Detection and Imaging Beijing, China, June 25–27, 2013 p89070K
[17] Twynstra M G, Daun K J 2012 Appl. Opt. 51 7059Google Scholar
[18] Grauer S J, Hadwin P J, Daun K J 2016 Appl. Opt. 55 5772Google Scholar
[19] Yu T, Tian B, Cai W W 2017 Opt. Express 25 5982Google Scholar
[20] Kang Y, Li N, Weng C S, Wang C W 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 104703Google Scholar
-
图 6 5种光路布置方式空间分布图与对应投影域图 (a) 2 × 10平行光路布置方式; (b) 4 × 5扇形光路布置方式; (c) 基于Mod设计的光路布置方式; (d) 基于单一正则化参数设计的光路布置方式; (e) 基于正则化参数矩阵设计的光路布置方式
Figure 6. Five example beam configuration in the physical space and in Radon space: (a) 2 × 10 parallel beams arrangement; (b) 4 × 5 fanned beams arrangement; (c) beams arrangement designed based on MOD method; (d) beams arrangement designed based on single regularization parameter; (e) beams arrangement designed based on regularization parameter matrix.
图 7 二维重建模型与不同光路布置方式重建结果 (a) 重建模型; (b) 2 × 10平行光路布置方式; (c) 4 × 5扇形光路布置方式; (d) 基于Mod设计的光路布置方式; (e) 基于单一正则化参数设计的光路布置方式; (f) 基于正则化参数矩阵设计的光路布置方式
Figure 7. Phantom and reconstruction results from different beam arrangement: (a) Phantom; (b) 2 × 10 parallel beams arrangement; (c) 4 × 5 fanned beams arrangement; (d) beams arrangement designed based on MOD method; (e) beams arrangement designed based on single regularization parameter; (f) beams arrangement designed based on regularization parameter matrix.
-
[1] Jatana G, Geckler S, Koeberlein D, Partridge W 2017 Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 240 1197Google Scholar
[2] Kamimoto T, Deguchi Y, Shisawa Y, Kitauchi Y, Eto Y 2016 Appl. Therm. Eng. 102 596Google Scholar
[3] Wood M P, Ozanyan K B 2015 IEEE Sens. J. 15 545Google Scholar
[4] Goldenstein C S, Spearrin R M, Jeffries J B, Hanson R K 2014 Appl. Phys. B 116 705Google Scholar
[5] Strand C L, Hanson R K 2015 AIAA 53 2978Google Scholar
[6] Tsekenis S A, Wilson D, Lengden M, Hyvonen J, Leinonen J, Shah A, Andersson O, McCann H 2017 Flow Meas. Instrum. 53 116Google Scholar
[7] Tsekenis S A, Polydorides, N 2017 IEEE Sens. J. 17 8072Google Scholar
[8] Xu L J, Liu C, Jing W Y, Cao Z, Xue X, Lin Y Z 2016 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 87 013101Google Scholar
[9] Cai W W, Kaminski C F 2017 Prog. Energy Combust.Sci. 59 1Google Scholar
[10] Liu C, Xu L J, Chen J L, Cao Z, Lin Y Z, Cai WW 2015 Opt. Express 23 22494Google Scholar
[11] Wang F, Wu Q, Huang Q X, Zhang H D, Yan J H, Cen K F 2015 Opt. Commun. 346 53Google Scholar
[12] Xia H H, Kan R F, Xu Z Y, He Y B, Liu J G, Chen B, Yang C G, Yao L, Wei M, Zhang G L 2017 Opt. Laser Eng. 90 10Google Scholar
[13] Cai W W, Ewing D J, Ma L 2008 Comput. Phys. Commun. 179 250Google Scholar
[14] Cai W W, Ewing D J, Ma L 2011 Appl.Math. Comput. 217 5754Google Scholar
[15] Terzija N, Davidson J L, Garciastewart C A, Wright P, Ozanyan K B, Pegrum S, Litt T J, Mccann H 2009 Meas. Sci.Technol. 19 094007Google Scholar
[16] Song J L, Hong Y J, Pan H, Wang G Y 2013 Proceedings of 5th International Symposium on Photoelectronic Detection and Imaging Beijing, China, June 25–27, 2013 p89070K
[17] Twynstra M G, Daun K J 2012 Appl. Opt. 51 7059Google Scholar
[18] Grauer S J, Hadwin P J, Daun K J 2016 Appl. Opt. 55 5772Google Scholar
[19] Yu T, Tian B, Cai W W 2017 Opt. Express 25 5982Google Scholar
[20] Kang Y, Li N, Weng C S, Wang C W 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 104703Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 6099
- PDF Downloads: 62
- Cited By: 0