Structure of collisional magnetized plasma sheath with non-extensive distribution of electrons

Zou Xiu; Liu Hui-Ping; Zhang Xiao-Nan; Qiu Ming-Hui

doi:10.7498/aps.70.20200794

Abstract

Many previous researches on the plasma sheath were based on the fact that the electrons satisfy the classical Maxwell velocity distribution function, while the particles in the plasma have long-range electromagnetic interactions. It is more appropriate to use the non-extensive distribution proposed by Tsallis to describe the electrons. In this paper, a collisional magnetized plasma sheath model with non-extensive distribution of electrons is established. Bohm criterion is derived theoretically. With the ion drift motion in the plasma pre-sheath region taken into consideration, the ion Mach number is only related to the angle of the magnetic field, the collision parameters, the electric field at the sheath edge, and non-extensive parameter $ q $. The influence of parameter $ q $ on the criterion is discussed in this paper. The lower limit of the ion Mach number changes with the value of parameter $ q $. The lower limit of the ion Mach number increases for $ q < 1 $. And the lower limit of the ion Mach number decreases for $ q>1 $. With the increase of $ q $, the number of electrons with lower speed increases, ions need less kinetic energy to enter into the sheath and thus enter into the sheath more easily. Through numerical simulation, it is found that compared with the structure of the plasma magnetized sheath with Maxwell distribution ($ q=1 $), the structure of the plasma magnetized sheath with super-extensive distribution ($ q < 1 $) and that with sub-extensive ($ q>1 $) are different, including the distribution of the space potential, the ion density, the electron density, and the space charge density. When $ q < 1 $, the space potential, the electron density and the ion density fall more slowly, and the peak of the space charge density curve is closer to the wall. When $ q>1 $, the space potential and the ion electron density fall faster, especially the electron density drops to zero faster, and the peak of the space charge density curve is far away from the wall. The simulation results show that the non-extensive parameter $ q $ has a significant influence on the structure of collisional plasma magnetized sheath. The influence of the collision on the magnetized plasma sheath with non-extensive distribution is similar to that with the Maxwell distribution. These conclusions may be useful in solving the problems of plasma boundary.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

School of Science, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China

Corresponding author: Zou Xiu, zouxiu@djtu.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 10605008) and the Scientific Research Foundation of the Education Department of Liaoning Province, China (Grant Nos. L2011069, JDL2017012)

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Chodura R 1982 Phys. Fluid 25 1628 Google Scholar
[2]	Riemann K U 1994 Phys. Plasmas 1 552 Google Scholar
[3]	Stangeby P C 1995 Phys. Plasmas 2 702 Google Scholar
[4]	Ahedo E 1997 Phys. Plasmas 4 4419 Google Scholar
[5]	Liu J Y, Wang Z X, Wang X G 2003 Phys. Plasmas 10 3032 Google Scholar
[6]	Liu J Y, Wang Z X, Wang X G, Zhang Q, Zou X 2003 Phys. Plasmas 10 3507 Google Scholar
[7]	王正汹, 刘金远, 邹秀, 刘悦, 王晓刚 2004 物理学报 53 0793 Google Scholar Wang Z X, Liu J Y, Zou X, Liu Y, Wang X G 2004 Acta Phys. Sin. 53 0793 Google Scholar
[8]	邹秀, 刘金远, 王正汹 2004 物理学报 53 3409 Google Scholar Zou X, Liu J Y, Wang Z X 2004 Acta Phys. Sin. 53 3409 Google Scholar
[9]	Masoudi S F 2007 Vacuum 81 871 Google Scholar
[10]	邹秀, 刘惠平, 谷秀娥 2008 物理学报 57 5111 Google Scholar Zou X, Liu H P, Gu X E 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 5111 Google Scholar
[11]	刘惠平, 邹秀, 邹滨雁, 邱明辉 2016 物理学报 65 245201 Google Scholar Liu H P, Zou X, Zou B Y, Qiu M H 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 245201 Google Scholar
[12]	邹秀, 籍延坤, 邹滨雁 2010 物理学报 59 1902 Google Scholar Zou X, Ji Y K, Zou B Y 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 1902 Google Scholar
[13]	刘惠平, 邹秀 2020 物理学报 69 025201 Google Scholar Liu H P, Zou X 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 025201 Google Scholar
[14]	Hatami M M 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 013508 Google Scholar
[15]	Hatami M M 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 023506 Google Scholar
[16]	Hatami M M, Tribeche M, Mamun A A 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 094502 Google Scholar
[17]	Borgohain D R, Saharia K, Goswami K S 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 122113 Google Scholar
[18]	Borgohain D R, Saharia K 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 032122 Google Scholar
[19]	赵晓云, 张丙开, 王春晓, 唐义甲 2019 物理学报 68 185204 Google Scholar Zhao X Y, Zhang B K, Wang C X, Tang Y J 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 185204 Google Scholar
[20]	Liu Y, Liu S Q, Xu K 2012 Phys. Plasmas 19 073702 Google Scholar
[21]	Liu Y, Liu S Q, Zhou L 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 043702 Google Scholar
[22]	Tantawy S A E, Tribeche M, Moslem W M 2012 Phys. Plasmas 19 032104 Google Scholar
[23]	Emamuddin M, Yasmin S, Asaduzzaman M, Mamun A A 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 083708 Google Scholar
[24]	Safa N N, Ghomi H, Niknam A R 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 082111 Google Scholar
[25]	Mehdipoor M, Mohsenpour T 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 112110 Google Scholar
[26]	Gougam L A, Triceche M 2011 Phys. Plasmas 18 062102 Google Scholar
[27]	Liu J Y, Wang F, Sun J Z 2011 Phys. Plasmas 18 013506 Google Scholar
[28]	Ou J, Yang J H 2012 Phys. Plasmas 19 113504 Google Scholar
[29]	Li J J, Ma J X, Wei Z A 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 063503 Google Scholar
[30]	Wang T T, Ma J X, Wei Z A 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 093505 Google Scholar
[31]	Tsallis C 1988 J. Stat. Phys. 52 479 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 等离子体磁鞘模型示意图

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of plasma magnetic sheath model.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 离子马赫数的下限随参数$ q $的变化 ($B=0.3~\mathrm{T}$, $ {E}_{0}=0.1 $)

Figure 2. Ion Mach number versus non-extensive parameter $ q $ ($B=0.3~\mathrm{T}$, $ {E}_{0}=0.1 $).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 具有不同参数$ q $值的鞘层空间电势($B=0.3~\mathrm{T}$, $ \theta =15° $, $ {E}_{0}=0.1 $, $ \beta =0 $)

Figure 3. Sheath potential for different values of non-extensive parameter$ q $ ($B=0.3~\mathrm{T}$, $ \theta =15° $, $ {E}_{0}=0.1 $, $ \beta =0 $).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 具有不同参数$ q $值的鞘层空间电荷密度分布 ($B= 0.3~\mathrm{T}$, $ \theta =15° $, $ {E}_{0}=0.1 $, $ \beta =0 $)

Figure 5. Normalized space charge density for different values of non-extensive parameter $ q $ ($B=0.3~\mathrm{T}$, $ \theta =15° $, ${E}_{0}= 0.1$, $ \beta =0 $).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 具有不同参数$ q $值的离子电子密度分布($B=0.3~\mathrm{T}$, $ \theta =15° $, $ {E}_{0}=0.1 $, $ \beta =0 $)　(a)$ q < 1 $; (b$ )q>1 $

Figure 4. Normalized density of ions and electrons for different values of non-extensive parameter $ q $ ($B=0.3~\mathrm{T}$, $ \theta =15° $, $ {E}_{0}=0.1 $, $ \beta =0 $): (a)$ q < 1 $; (b)$ q>1 $

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 具有不同碰撞参数$ \nu $值的离子电子密度分布($B= 0.3~\mathrm{T}$, $ \theta =15° $, $ {E}_{0}=0.5 $, $ \beta =0 $, $ q=0.9 $)

Figure 6. Normalized density of ions and electrons for different values of collision parameter $ \nu $ ($B=0.3~\mathrm{T}$, $ \theta =15° $, $ {E}_{0}=0.5, \beta =0 $, $ q=0.9 $).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 7 具有不同碰撞参数$ \nu $值的鞘层空间电荷密度分布 ($B= 0.3~\mathrm{T}$, $ \theta =15° $, $ {E}_{0}=0.5 $, $ \beta =0 $, $ q=0.9 $)

Figure 7. Normalized space charge density for different values of collision parameter $ \nu $ ($B=0.3~\mathrm{T}$, $ \theta =15° $, $ {E}_{0}=0.5 $, $ \beta =0 $, $ q=0.9 $)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

[1]	Chodura R 1982 Phys. Fluid 25 1628 Google Scholar
[2]	Riemann K U 1994 Phys. Plasmas 1 552 Google Scholar
[3]	Stangeby P C 1995 Phys. Plasmas 2 702 Google Scholar
[4]	Ahedo E 1997 Phys. Plasmas 4 4419 Google Scholar
[5]	Liu J Y, Wang Z X, Wang X G 2003 Phys. Plasmas 10 3032 Google Scholar
[6]	Liu J Y, Wang Z X, Wang X G, Zhang Q, Zou X 2003 Phys. Plasmas 10 3507 Google Scholar
[7]	王正汹, 刘金远, 邹秀, 刘悦, 王晓刚 2004 物理学报 53 0793 Google Scholar Wang Z X, Liu J Y, Zou X, Liu Y, Wang X G 2004 Acta Phys. Sin. 53 0793 Google Scholar
[8]	邹秀, 刘金远, 王正汹 2004 物理学报 53 3409 Google Scholar Zou X, Liu J Y, Wang Z X 2004 Acta Phys. Sin. 53 3409 Google Scholar
[9]	Masoudi S F 2007 Vacuum 81 871 Google Scholar
[10]	邹秀, 刘惠平, 谷秀娥 2008 物理学报 57 5111 Google Scholar Zou X, Liu H P, Gu X E 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 5111 Google Scholar
[11]	刘惠平, 邹秀, 邹滨雁, 邱明辉 2016 物理学报 65 245201 Google Scholar Liu H P, Zou X, Zou B Y, Qiu M H 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 245201 Google Scholar
[12]	邹秀, 籍延坤, 邹滨雁 2010 物理学报 59 1902 Google Scholar Zou X, Ji Y K, Zou B Y 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 59 1902 Google Scholar
[13]	刘惠平, 邹秀 2020 物理学报 69 025201 Google Scholar Liu H P, Zou X 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 025201 Google Scholar
[14]	Hatami M M 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 013508 Google Scholar
[15]	Hatami M M 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 023506 Google Scholar
[16]	Hatami M M, Tribeche M, Mamun A A 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 094502 Google Scholar
[17]	Borgohain D R, Saharia K, Goswami K S 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 122113 Google Scholar
[18]	Borgohain D R, Saharia K 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 032122 Google Scholar
[19]	赵晓云, 张丙开, 王春晓, 唐义甲 2019 物理学报 68 185204 Google Scholar Zhao X Y, Zhang B K, Wang C X, Tang Y J 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 185204 Google Scholar
[20]	Liu Y, Liu S Q, Xu K 2012 Phys. Plasmas 19 073702 Google Scholar
[21]	Liu Y, Liu S Q, Zhou L 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 043702 Google Scholar
[22]	Tantawy S A E, Tribeche M, Moslem W M 2012 Phys. Plasmas 19 032104 Google Scholar
[23]	Emamuddin M, Yasmin S, Asaduzzaman M, Mamun A A 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 083708 Google Scholar
[24]	Safa N N, Ghomi H, Niknam A R 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 082111 Google Scholar
[25]	Mehdipoor M, Mohsenpour T 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 112110 Google Scholar
[26]	Gougam L A, Triceche M 2011 Phys. Plasmas 18 062102 Google Scholar
[27]	Liu J Y, Wang F, Sun J Z 2011 Phys. Plasmas 18 013506 Google Scholar
[28]	Ou J, Yang J H 2012 Phys. Plasmas 19 113504 Google Scholar
[29]	Li J J, Ma J X, Wei Z A 2013 Phys. Plasmas 20 063503 Google Scholar
[30]	Wang T T, Ma J X, Wei Z A 2015 Phys. Plasmas 22 093505 Google Scholar
[31]	Tsallis C 1988 J. Stat. Phys. 52 479 Google Scholar

Catalog

Vol. 70, Issue 1 - 2021-01-05

Metrics

Abstract views: 4081
PDF Downloads: 57
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板