-
The laser frequency scanning interferometry, as a non-contact method, has non-ranging blind zone and achieves multi-target testing in a single measurement. The beat frequency of target can be extracted by Fourier transform, and then the distance can be solved. However, due to the limitation of laser frequency modulation bandwidth, the resolution of target obtained by Fourier transform is limited to the inherent resolution. In order to solve this problem, in this paper we propose to use the estimating signal parameter via rotational invariance technique (ESPRIT) to perform spectrum analysis on the measured signal. In the experiment, the resampling method is adopted to correct the non-linearity of the measured signal beat frequency, and then the ESPRIT algorithm is used to obtain the target distance. The results show that the Fourier transform algorithm cannot distinguish the target signal from the frequencies of adjacent target, but the ESPRIT algorithm can do. The thickness of the measured target is 2.08 mm. This provides ideas for measuring, such as damage point in the proximity of the fiber, height of thin step, or small hole.
-
Keywords:
- laser frequency scanning interferometry /
- fast Fourier transform /
- estimating signal parameter via rotational invariance technique algorithm
[1] 谭林秋, 华灯鑫, 汪丽, 高飞, 狄慧鸽 2014 物理学报 63 224205Google Scholar
Tan L Q, Hua D X, Wang L, Gao F, Di H G 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 224205Google Scholar
[2] 杨凌辉 2010 博士学位论文 (天津: 天津大学)
Yang L H 2010Ph. D. Dissertation (Tianjin: Tianjin University) (in Chinese)
[3] Yang Z D, Wang P, Li X H, Sun C K 2014 Opt. Lasers Eng. 54 31Google Scholar
[4] 高峰, 郭为忠, 宋清玉, 杜凤山 2010 机械工程学报 46 92Google Scholar
Gao F, Guo W Z, Song Q, Du F S 2010 Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 46 92Google Scholar
[5] Wen X D, Ning T G, You H D, Kang Z X, Li J, Li C, Feng T, Yu S W, Jian W 2014 Chin. Phys. Lett. 31 034203Google Scholar
[6] 刘亭洋, 张福民, 吴翰钟, 李建双, 石永强, 曲兴华 2016 物理学报 66 020601Google Scholar
Liu T Y, Zhang F M, Wu H Z, Li J S, Shi Y Q, Qu X H 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 020601Google Scholar
[7] 时光, 张福民, 曲兴华, 孟祥松 2014 物理学报 63 184209Google Scholar
Shi G, Zhang F M, Qu X H, Meng X S 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 184209Google Scholar
[8] Shi G, Wang W, Zhang F M 2018 Opt. Commun. 411 152Google Scholar
[9] Schneider R 2001 Opt. Eng. 40 33Google Scholar
[10] Arseny V, Naresh S, Xu S B 2010 Appl. Opt. 49 1932Google Scholar
[11] Yu X, Hong G L, Ling Y 2011 Acta Opt. Sin. 31 0606002Google Scholar
[12] 孟祥松, 张福民, 曲兴华 2015 物理学报 64 230601Google Scholar
Meng X S, Zhang F M, Qu X H 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 230601Google Scholar
[13] Xu S Z, Kooij B J, Yarovoy A 2019 Sig. Pro. 168 107259
[14] Sébastien L F, Yves S, Rostand M, Patrick F 2008 Appl. Opt. 47 3027Google Scholar
[15] John D, Ben H, Andrew J L, Andrew J L, Armin J H 2014 Opt. Express 22 24869Google Scholar
[16] Mateo A B, Barber Z W 2015 Appl. Opt. 54 6019Google Scholar
[17] Lippok N, Coen S, Nielsen P 2012 Opt. Express 20 23398Google Scholar
[18] Jiang S, Liu B, Wang H C, Zhao B 2019 Sensors 19 5132Google Scholar
[19] Pan H, Zhang F M, Shi C Z, Qu X H 2017 Appl. Opt. 56 6956Google Scholar
[20] Deng Z W, Liu Z G, Gu S W, Jia X Y, Deng W, Yan H H 2020 Opt. Commun. 455 124556Google Scholar
[21] Deng Z W, Liu Z G, Jia X Y, Deng W, Zhang X, Wang Z Y 2019 Appl. Opt. 58 6865Google Scholar
[22] 刘国栋, 许新科, 刘炳国, 陈凤东, 胡涛, 路程, 甘雨 2016 物理学报 65 209501Google Scholar
Liu G D, Xu X K, Liu B G, Chen F D, Hu T, Lu C, Gan Y 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 209501Google Scholar
[23] 许新科, 刘国栋, 刘炳国, 陈凤东, 庄志涛, 甘雨 2015 物理学报 64 219501Google Scholar
Xu X K, Liu G D, Liu B G, Chen F D, Zhuang Z T, Gan Y 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 219501Google Scholar
[24] 张立宏 2013 博士学位论文 (哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学)
Zhang L H 2013Ph. D. Dissertation (Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology) (in Chinese)
[25] 许新科 2017 博士学位论文 (哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学)
Xu X K 2017 Ph. D. Dissertation (Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology) (in Chinese)
-
表 1 不同距离下三种算法的测量结果与实际距离的比较
Table 1. Comparison of the measurement results of three algorithms and the actual distance under different distances.
实际距
离/mmFFT算法
误差/mmMUSIC算法
误差/mmESPRIT算法
误差/mm127.633 –0.005 –0.328 0.007 100.797 –0.013 0.600 0.012 109.165 –0.010 0.230 0.009 99.154 0.003 –0.093 –0.002 124.060 –0.016 –0.621 0.014 表 2 ESPRIT算法对不同厚度的双目标的测量结果与实际厚度的比较
Table 2. Comparison of the measurement results of the ESPRIT algorithm with the actual thickness of dual targets.
实际厚度/mm ESPRIT测量结果/mm 误差/mm 15.362 15.327 –0.035 20.291 20.316 0.025 24.144 24.182 0.038 -
[1] 谭林秋, 华灯鑫, 汪丽, 高飞, 狄慧鸽 2014 物理学报 63 224205Google Scholar
Tan L Q, Hua D X, Wang L, Gao F, Di H G 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 224205Google Scholar
[2] 杨凌辉 2010 博士学位论文 (天津: 天津大学)
Yang L H 2010Ph. D. Dissertation (Tianjin: Tianjin University) (in Chinese)
[3] Yang Z D, Wang P, Li X H, Sun C K 2014 Opt. Lasers Eng. 54 31Google Scholar
[4] 高峰, 郭为忠, 宋清玉, 杜凤山 2010 机械工程学报 46 92Google Scholar
Gao F, Guo W Z, Song Q, Du F S 2010 Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 46 92Google Scholar
[5] Wen X D, Ning T G, You H D, Kang Z X, Li J, Li C, Feng T, Yu S W, Jian W 2014 Chin. Phys. Lett. 31 034203Google Scholar
[6] 刘亭洋, 张福民, 吴翰钟, 李建双, 石永强, 曲兴华 2016 物理学报 66 020601Google Scholar
Liu T Y, Zhang F M, Wu H Z, Li J S, Shi Y Q, Qu X H 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 66 020601Google Scholar
[7] 时光, 张福民, 曲兴华, 孟祥松 2014 物理学报 63 184209Google Scholar
Shi G, Zhang F M, Qu X H, Meng X S 2014 Acta Phys. Sin. 63 184209Google Scholar
[8] Shi G, Wang W, Zhang F M 2018 Opt. Commun. 411 152Google Scholar
[9] Schneider R 2001 Opt. Eng. 40 33Google Scholar
[10] Arseny V, Naresh S, Xu S B 2010 Appl. Opt. 49 1932Google Scholar
[11] Yu X, Hong G L, Ling Y 2011 Acta Opt. Sin. 31 0606002Google Scholar
[12] 孟祥松, 张福民, 曲兴华 2015 物理学报 64 230601Google Scholar
Meng X S, Zhang F M, Qu X H 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 230601Google Scholar
[13] Xu S Z, Kooij B J, Yarovoy A 2019 Sig. Pro. 168 107259
[14] Sébastien L F, Yves S, Rostand M, Patrick F 2008 Appl. Opt. 47 3027Google Scholar
[15] John D, Ben H, Andrew J L, Andrew J L, Armin J H 2014 Opt. Express 22 24869Google Scholar
[16] Mateo A B, Barber Z W 2015 Appl. Opt. 54 6019Google Scholar
[17] Lippok N, Coen S, Nielsen P 2012 Opt. Express 20 23398Google Scholar
[18] Jiang S, Liu B, Wang H C, Zhao B 2019 Sensors 19 5132Google Scholar
[19] Pan H, Zhang F M, Shi C Z, Qu X H 2017 Appl. Opt. 56 6956Google Scholar
[20] Deng Z W, Liu Z G, Gu S W, Jia X Y, Deng W, Yan H H 2020 Opt. Commun. 455 124556Google Scholar
[21] Deng Z W, Liu Z G, Jia X Y, Deng W, Zhang X, Wang Z Y 2019 Appl. Opt. 58 6865Google Scholar
[22] 刘国栋, 许新科, 刘炳国, 陈凤东, 胡涛, 路程, 甘雨 2016 物理学报 65 209501Google Scholar
Liu G D, Xu X K, Liu B G, Chen F D, Hu T, Lu C, Gan Y 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 209501Google Scholar
[23] 许新科, 刘国栋, 刘炳国, 陈凤东, 庄志涛, 甘雨 2015 物理学报 64 219501Google Scholar
Xu X K, Liu G D, Liu B G, Chen F D, Zhuang Z T, Gan Y 2015 Acta Phys. Sin. 64 219501Google Scholar
[24] 张立宏 2013 博士学位论文 (哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学)
Zhang L H 2013Ph. D. Dissertation (Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology) (in Chinese)
[25] 许新科 2017 博士学位论文 (哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学)
Xu X K 2017 Ph. D. Dissertation (Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology) (in Chinese)
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 5959
- PDF Downloads: 78
- Cited By: 0