-
Multifocal structured illumination microscopy (MSIM) can achieve a doubled improvement in the resolution of the diffraction limit within an imaging depth of 50 μm. But when imaging thick samples, scattered light and defocused light limit its optical sectioning capability and image contrast. Two-photon MSIM (2P-MSIM) overcomes the influence of sample tissue scattering and further improves the imaging depth and imaging characteristics. However, the existing 2P-MSIM usually adopts galvanometer based scanning mirrors for precisely scanning imaging, which is a complicated and poor flexibility system. Here we propose a simpler 2P-MSIM. Two-photon multifocal scanning imaging can be realized by a spatial light modulator (SLM) with a high frame rate (< 845 Hz). The phase map of generating multi-focus array and linear phase grating loaded on the SLM simultaneously, high-precision parallel digital random address scanning and excitation imaging on the sample surface can be realized. The mechanical inertia problem of the galvanometer scanner in multifocal imaging can be solved by the proposed method while reducing the complexity of the system and improving flexibility. We finally realize two-photon multifocal imaging of mouse kidney tissue slices and lily of the valley rhizome by this system, which verifies the three-dimensional super-resolution imaging capability of this method. It is of great significance in developing the 2P-MSIM.
-
Keywords:
- multifocal structured illumination microscopy /
- two-photon /
- fluorescence microscope /
- spatial light modulator
[1] Hell S W, Wichmann J 1994 Opt. Lett. 19 780
Google Scholar
[2] Betzig E, Patterson G H, Sougrat R, Lindwasser O W, Olenych S, Bonifacino J S, Davidson M W, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Hess H F 2006 Science 313 1642
Google Scholar
[3] Rust M J, Bates M, Zhuang X W 2006 Nat. Methods 3 793
Google Scholar
[4] Gustafsson M G L 2000 J. Microsc. 198 82
Google Scholar
[5] Muller C B, Enderlein J 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104
Google Scholar
[6] York A G, Parekh S H, Nogare D D, Fischer R S, Temprine K, Mione M, Chitnis A B, Combs C A, Shroff H 2012 Nat. Methods 9 749
Google Scholar
[7] Nielsen T, Frick M, Hellweg D, Andresen P 2001 J. Microsc-Oxford 201 368
Google Scholar
[8] Bewersdorf J, Pick R, Hell S W 1998 Opt. Lett. 23 655
Google Scholar
[9] Qu J L, Liu L X, Chen D N, Lin Z Y, Xu G X, Guo B P, Niu H B 2006 Opt. Lett. 31 368
Google Scholar
[10] Ingaramo M, York A G, Wawrzusin P, Milberg O, Hong A, Weigert R, Shroff H, Patterson G H 2014 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 5254
Google Scholar
[11] Sacconi L, Froner E, Antolini R, Taghizadeh M R, Choudhury A, Pavone F S 2003 Opt. Lett. 28 1918
Google Scholar
[12] Jureller J E, Kim H Y, Scherer N F 2006 Opt. Express 14 3406
Google Scholar
[13] Shao Y, Qin W, Liu H, Qu J, Peng X, Niu H, Gao B Z 2012 Appl. Phys. B 107 653
Google Scholar
[14] Matsumoto N, Okazaki S, Fukushi Y, Takamoto H, Inoue T, Terakawa S 2014 Opt. Express 22 633
Google Scholar
[15] Matsumoto N, Konno A, Ohbayashi Y, Inoue T, Matsumoto A, Uchimura K, Kadomatsu K, Okazaki S 2017 Opt. Express 25 7055
Google Scholar
[16] Sinclair G, Leach J, Jordan P, Gibson G, Yao E, Laczik Z J, Padgett M J, Courtial J 2004 Opt. Express 12 1665
Google Scholar
[17] Curtis J E, Koss B A, Grier D G 2002 Opt. Commun. 207 169
Google Scholar
[18] Meister M, Winfield R J 2002 Opt. Commun. 203 39
Google Scholar
[19] Di Leonardo R, Ianni F, Ruocco G 2007 Opt. Express 15 1913
Google Scholar
[20] Kim D, Keesling A, Omran A, Levine H, Bernien H, Greiner M, Lukin M D, Englund D R 2019 Opt. Lett. 44 3178
Google Scholar
[21] Sheppard C J R, Gu M 1990 Opitk 86 104
Google Scholar
[22] Roider C, Heintzmann R, Piestun R, Jesacher A 2016 Opt. Express 24 15456
Google Scholar
[23] Schmitz C H J, Spatz J P, Curtis J E 2005 Opt. Express 13 8678
Google Scholar
[24] Li S W, Wu J J, Li H, Lin D Y, Yu B, Qu J L 2018 Opt. Express 26 23585
Google Scholar
-
图 1 2P-MSIM系统光路示意图
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of 2P-MSIM system.
图 2 (a) WGS算法流程图; (b)得到的相位图; (c)生成的点阵图
Figure 2. (a) Flow chart of WGS algorithm; (b) generated phase map; (c) generated multi-focus array.
图 3 100 nm荧光珠成像 (a) PinholedWF图像; (b) MPSS图像; (c) MSIM图像; (d)图(a)—(c)中黄色实线所在像素值的大小与对应像素所占宽度的拟合曲线; (e)单个荧光珠的高斯拟合曲线
Figure 3. 100 nm fluorescent bead imaging: (a) PinholedWF image; (b) MPSS image; (c) MSIM image; (d) fitting curves of the size of the pixel value of the yellow solid lines in panel (a)－(c) vs. the width of corresponding pixel; (e) Gaussian fitting curves of a single fluorescent bead.
图 4 小鼠肾切片的不同厚度层成像图
Figure 4. Images of different thickness layers of mouse kidney section.
图 5 小鼠肾切片三维成像图 (a) PinholedWF图像; (b) MSIM图像
Figure 5. Three-dimensional image of mouse kidney section: (a) PinholedWF image; (b) MSIM image.
图 6 铃兰根茎不同厚度层成像图
Figure 6. Images of different thickness layers of lily of the valley rhizome.
-
[1] Hell S W, Wichmann J 1994 Opt. Lett. 19 780
Google Scholar
[2] Betzig E, Patterson G H, Sougrat R, Lindwasser O W, Olenych S, Bonifacino J S, Davidson M W, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Hess H F 2006 Science 313 1642
Google Scholar
[3] Rust M J, Bates M, Zhuang X W 2006 Nat. Methods 3 793
Google Scholar
[4] Gustafsson M G L 2000 J. Microsc. 198 82
Google Scholar
[5] Muller C B, Enderlein J 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 104
Google Scholar
[6] York A G, Parekh S H, Nogare D D, Fischer R S, Temprine K, Mione M, Chitnis A B, Combs C A, Shroff H 2012 Nat. Methods 9 749
Google Scholar
[7] Nielsen T, Frick M, Hellweg D, Andresen P 2001 J. Microsc-Oxford 201 368
Google Scholar
[8] Bewersdorf J, Pick R, Hell S W 1998 Opt. Lett. 23 655
Google Scholar
[9] Qu J L, Liu L X, Chen D N, Lin Z Y, Xu G X, Guo B P, Niu H B 2006 Opt. Lett. 31 368
Google Scholar
[10] Ingaramo M, York A G, Wawrzusin P, Milberg O, Hong A, Weigert R, Shroff H, Patterson G H 2014 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 5254
Google Scholar
[11] Sacconi L, Froner E, Antolini R, Taghizadeh M R, Choudhury A, Pavone F S 2003 Opt. Lett. 28 1918
Google Scholar
[12] Jureller J E, Kim H Y, Scherer N F 2006 Opt. Express 14 3406
Google Scholar
[13] Shao Y, Qin W, Liu H, Qu J, Peng X, Niu H, Gao B Z 2012 Appl. Phys. B 107 653
Google Scholar
[14] Matsumoto N, Okazaki S, Fukushi Y, Takamoto H, Inoue T, Terakawa S 2014 Opt. Express 22 633
Google Scholar
[15] Matsumoto N, Konno A, Ohbayashi Y, Inoue T, Matsumoto A, Uchimura K, Kadomatsu K, Okazaki S 2017 Opt. Express 25 7055
Google Scholar
[16] Sinclair G, Leach J, Jordan P, Gibson G, Yao E, Laczik Z J, Padgett M J, Courtial J 2004 Opt. Express 12 1665
Google Scholar
[17] Curtis J E, Koss B A, Grier D G 2002 Opt. Commun. 207 169
Google Scholar
[18] Meister M, Winfield R J 2002 Opt. Commun. 203 39
Google Scholar
[19] Di Leonardo R, Ianni F, Ruocco G 2007 Opt. Express 15 1913
Google Scholar
[20] Kim D, Keesling A, Omran A, Levine H, Bernien H, Greiner M, Lukin M D, Englund D R 2019 Opt. Lett. 44 3178
Google Scholar
[21] Sheppard C J R, Gu M 1990 Opitk 86 104
Google Scholar
[22] Roider C, Heintzmann R, Piestun R, Jesacher A 2016 Opt. Express 24 15456
Google Scholar
[23] Schmitz C H J, Spatz J P, Curtis J E 2005 Opt. Express 13 8678
Google Scholar
[24] Li S W, Wu J J, Li H, Lin D Y, Yu B, Qu J L 2018 Opt. Express 26 23585
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 8469
- PDF Downloads: 217
- Cited By: 0
