Search

Article

x

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Chiral optical transport of quantum dots with different diamagnetic behaviors in a waveguide

Shi Shu-Shu Xiao Shan Xu Xiu-Lai

Citation:

Chiral optical transport of quantum dots with different diamagnetic behaviors in a waveguide

Shi Shu-Shu, Xiao Shan, Xu Xiu-Lai
PDF
HTML
Get Citation
  • In order to realize scalable and integrated quantum photonic networks, various functional devices are highly desired. Strip waveguides with unidirectional transmission function have a wide range of applications in devices such as single-photon diodes, transistors and deterministic quantum gate devices. In this work, the separation of circularly polarized light is achieved by exciting a quantum dot light source in a central region of a waveguide at a low temperature of 4.2 K by using a confocal microscope system. By applying a magnetic field with Faraday configuration (along with the quantum dot growth direction), the spin-momentum locking effect in the waveguide is verified. Both forward shift and reverse shift of different values of output photon energy are demonstrated to show the unidirectional transmission of the waveguide. The chiral transmission of quantum dot with anomalous diamagnetic behavior is achieved in experiment, leading to a wider range of wavelength tuning for chrial transmission in a single waveguide. This paper provides a basis for investigating the chiral quantum devices in a wide wavelength range and expands the applications of waveguides in the field of optical quantum information.
      Corresponding author: Xu Xiu-Lai, xlxu@iphy.ac.cn
    • Funds: Project is supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFA1400700), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62025507, 11934019, 11721404, 11874419), the Guangdong Provincial Key Area R&D Program, China (Grant No. 2018B03032900), and the Strategic Pioneer Science and Technology Special Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB28000000)
    [1]

    Bennett C H, DiVincenzo D P 2000 Nature 404 247Google Scholar

    [2]

    Monroe C 2002 Nature 416 238Google Scholar

    [3]

    Northup T E, Blatt R 2014 Nat. Photonics 8 356Google Scholar

    [4]

    Kues M, Reimer C, Roztocki P, Cortés L R, Sciara S, Wetzel B, Zhang Y, Cino A, Chu S T, Little B E, Moss D J, L Caspani, Azaña J, Morandotti R 2017 Nature 546 622Google Scholar

    [5]

    Lodahl P, Mahmoodian S, Stobbe S, Rauschenbeutel A, Schneeweiss P, Volz J, Pichler H, Zoller P 2017 Nature 541 473Google Scholar

    [6]

    Petersen J, Volz J, Rauschenbeutel A 2014 Science 346 67Google Scholar

    [7]

    Mitsch R, Sayrin C, Albrecht B, Schneeweiss P, Rauschenbeutel A 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 5713Google Scholar

    [8]

    Söllner I, Mahmoodian S, Hansen S L, Midolo L, Javadi A, Kiršanskė G, Pregnolato T, El-Ella H, Lee E H, Song J D, Stobbe S, Lodahl P 2015 Nat. Nanotechnol. 10 775Google Scholar

    [9]

    Mehrabad M J, Foster A P, Dost R, Fox A M, Skolnick M S, Wilson L R 2020 Optica 7 1690Google Scholar

    [10]

    Rodríguez-Fortuño F J, Barber-Sanz I, Puerto D, Griol A, Martínez A 2014 ACS Photonics 1 762Google Scholar

    [11]

    Tang L, Tang J, Zhang W, Lu G, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Xia K, Xiao M 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 043833Google Scholar

    [12]

    Mahmoodian S, Prindal-Nielsen K, Söllner I, Søren S, Peter L 2017 Opt. Mater. Express 7 43Google Scholar

    [13]

    Coles R, Price D, Dixon J, Royall B, Clarke E, Kok P, Skolnick M, Fox A M, Makhonin M 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 11183Google Scholar

    [14]

    Barik S, Karasahin A, Flower C, Cai T, Miyake H, DeGottardi W, Hafezi M, Waks E 2018 Science 359 666Google Scholar

    [15]

    Xiao S, Wu S Y, Xie X, Yang J N, Wei W Q, Shi S S, Song F L, Sun S B, Dang J C, Yang L L, Wang Y N, Zuo Z C, Wang T, Zhang J J, Xu X L 2021 Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 091106Google Scholar

    [16]

    Xiao S, Wu S Y, Xie X, Yang J N, Wei W Q, Shi S S, Song F L, Dang J C, Sun S B, Yang L L, Wang Y N, Yan S, Zuo Z C, Wang T, Zhang J J, Jin K J, Xu X L 2021 Laser Photonics Rev. 8 2100009Google Scholar

    [17]

    Shen Y, Bradford M, Shen J T 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 173902Google Scholar

    [18]

    Yan W B, Ni W Y, Zhang J, Zhang F Y, Fan H 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 043852Google Scholar

    [19]

    Javadi A, Söllner I, Arcari M, Hansen S L, Midolo L, Mahmoodian S, Kiršanskė G, Pregnolato T, Lee E H, Song J D, Stobbe S, Lodahl P 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 8655Google Scholar

    [20]

    Javadi A, Ding D P, Appel M H, Mahmoodian S, Löbl M C, Söllner I, Schott R, Papon C, Pregnolato T, Stobbe S, Midolo L, Schröder T, Wieck A D, Ludwig A, Warburton R, Lodahl P 2018 Nat. Nanotechnol. 13 398Google Scholar

    [21]

    Li T, Miranowicz A, Hu X, Xia K, Nori F 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 062318Google Scholar

    [22]

    Yan C H, Li Y, Yuan H, Wei L F 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 023821Google Scholar

    [23]

    Tang J, Xu X L 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 027804Google Scholar

    [24]

    Kiraz A, Atatüre M, Imamoğlu A 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 032305Google Scholar

    [25]

    Xu X, Toft I, Phillips R T, Mar J, Hammura K, Williams D A 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 061103Google Scholar

    [26]

    Sapienza L, Davanço M, Badolato A, Srinivasan K 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7833Google Scholar

    [27]

    Senellart P, Solomon G, White A 2017 Nat. Nanotechnol. 12 1026Google Scholar

    [28]

    Imamog A, Awschalom D D, Burkard G, DiVincenzo D P, Loss D, Sherwin M, Small A 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 4204Google Scholar

    [29]

    Gao W B, Fallahi P, Togan E, Miguel-Sánchez J, Imamoglu A 2012 Nature 491 426Google Scholar

    [30]

    Warburton R J 2013 Nat. Mater. 12 483Google Scholar

    [31]

    Qian C J, Wu S Y, Song F L, Peng K, Xie X, Yang J N, Xiao S, Steer M J, Thayne I G, Tang C C, Zuo Z C, Jin K J, Gu C Z, Xu X L 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 213901Google Scholar

    [32]

    Qian C J, Xie X, Yang J N, Peng K, Wu S Y, Song F L, Sun S B, Dang J C, Yu Y, Steer M J, Thayne I G, Jin K J, Gu C Z, Xu X L 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 087401Google Scholar

    [33]

    Jun L, Qiong W, Le-Man K, Hao-Sheng Z 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 030313Google Scholar

    [34]

    Wu S Y, Peng K, Xie X, Yang J N, Xiao S, Song F L, Dang J N, Sun S B, Yang L L, Wang Y N, Shi S S, He J J, Zuo Z C, Xu X L 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 14 014049Google Scholar

    [35]

    Cao S, Tang J, Gao Y N, Sun Y, Qiu K S, Zhao Y H, He M, Shi J A, Gu L, Williams D A, W D, Jin K J, Xu X L 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 8041Google Scholar

    [36]

    Fu Y J, Lin S D, Tsai M F, Lin H, Lin C H, Chou H Y, Cheng S J, Chang W H 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 113307Google Scholar

    [37]

    Lin T C, Li L C, Lin S D, Suen Y W, Lee C P 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 110 013522Google Scholar

    [38]

    Cao S, Tang J, Sun Y, Peng K, GaoY N, Zhao Y H, Qian C J, Sun S B, Ali H, Shao Y T, Wu S Y, Song F L, Williams D A, Sheng W D, Jin K J, Xu X L 2016 Nano Res. 9 306Google Scholar

    [39]

    Bayer M, Walck S N, Reinecke T L, Forchel A 1998 Phys. Rev. B 57 6584Google Scholar

    [40]

    Schulhauser C, Haft D, Warburton R J, Karrai K, Govorov A O, Kalameitsev A V, Chaplik A, Schoenfeld W, Garcia J M, Petroff P M 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 193303Google Scholar

    [41]

    Glazov M M, Ivchenko E L, Krebs O, Kowalik K, Voisin P 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 193313Google Scholar

    [42]

    Tsai M F, Lin H, Lin C H, Lin S D, Wang S Y, Lo M C, Cheng S J, Lee M C, Chang W H 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 267402Google Scholar

  • 图 1  条形波导的结构和量子点的能级示意图 (a)条形波导的SEM图像, 实验中激光激发波导中心区域的量子点, 并从左右两侧光栅耦合器分别收集量子点的荧光; 右边的插图为波导中心区域横截面中量子点分布的示意图; (b)量子点能级的Zeeman分裂示意图, Zeeman分裂导致了两支极化相反的圆偏振光σ和σ+的产生.

    Figure 1.  Schematic diagram of the structure of the strip waveguide and the energy levels of a quantum dot (QD). (a) SEM image of a strip waveguide. In the experiment, the QDs in the central area of the waveguide were excited by the laser, and the photoluminescence (PL) spetra of the QDs were collected from the left and right grating couplers, respectively. Illustration on the right is the schematic diagram of QDs distributed in the central area of the cross section of the waveguide. (b) Zeeman splitting of the QD energy levels. Zeeman splitting results in two branches of circularly polarized light with opposite polarization σ and σ+.

    图 2  正常抗磁行为量子点的手性传输实验结果 (a) 施加0—8 T的磁场, 从左右两侧光栅耦合器分别收集到的量子点激子态的圆极化荧光光谱; (b) 随磁场变化的荧光光谱的峰值; (c) 激子态的Zeeman分裂随磁场的变化和对应的g因子; (d)激子态劈裂峰的能量平均值随磁场的变化和对应的抗磁系数.

    Figure 2.  Experimental results of chiral transport of QDs with normal diamagnetic behavior: (a) Circularly polarized PL spectra of excitonic states of QDs collected from the left and right grating couplers by applying a magnetic field from 0 T to 8 T, respectively; (b) PL peak energies as a function of an applied magnetic field; (c) Zeeman splitting of the exciton state with a magnetic field and the corresponding g-factor; (d) average energy of the splitting peaks with a magnetic field and the corresponding diamagnetic coefficient.

    图 3  反常磁行为量子点的手性传输实验结果 (a) 施加0—8 T的磁场, 从左右两侧光栅耦合器分别收集到的量子点激子态的圆极化荧光光谱; (b) 随磁场变化的荧光光谱的峰值; (c) 激子态的Zeeman分裂随磁场的变化和对应的g因子; (d)激子态劈裂峰的能量平均值随磁场的变化和对应的抗磁系数.

    Figure 3.  Experimental results of chiral transport of QDs with anomalous diamagnetic behavior: (a) Circularly polarized PL spectra of excitonic states of QDs collected from the left and right grating couplers by applying a magnetic field from 0 T to 8 T, respectively; (b) PL peak energies as a function of an applied magnetic field; (c) Zeeman splitting of the exciton state with a magnetic field and the corresponding g-factor; (d) average energy of the splitting peaks with a magnetic field and the corresponding diamagnetic coefficient.

    图 4  不同量子点的手性对比度 (a)正常抗磁行为量子点的手性对比度随磁场的变化; (b)反常抗磁行为量子点的手性对比度随磁场的变化.

    Figure 4.  Chiral contrast for different QDs: (a) Variation of chiral contrast with a magnetic field for the QD with a normal diamagnetic behavior; (b) variation of chiral contrast with a magnetic field for the QD with an anomalous diamagnetic behavior.

  • [1]

    Bennett C H, DiVincenzo D P 2000 Nature 404 247Google Scholar

    [2]

    Monroe C 2002 Nature 416 238Google Scholar

    [3]

    Northup T E, Blatt R 2014 Nat. Photonics 8 356Google Scholar

    [4]

    Kues M, Reimer C, Roztocki P, Cortés L R, Sciara S, Wetzel B, Zhang Y, Cino A, Chu S T, Little B E, Moss D J, L Caspani, Azaña J, Morandotti R 2017 Nature 546 622Google Scholar

    [5]

    Lodahl P, Mahmoodian S, Stobbe S, Rauschenbeutel A, Schneeweiss P, Volz J, Pichler H, Zoller P 2017 Nature 541 473Google Scholar

    [6]

    Petersen J, Volz J, Rauschenbeutel A 2014 Science 346 67Google Scholar

    [7]

    Mitsch R, Sayrin C, Albrecht B, Schneeweiss P, Rauschenbeutel A 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 5713Google Scholar

    [8]

    Söllner I, Mahmoodian S, Hansen S L, Midolo L, Javadi A, Kiršanskė G, Pregnolato T, El-Ella H, Lee E H, Song J D, Stobbe S, Lodahl P 2015 Nat. Nanotechnol. 10 775Google Scholar

    [9]

    Mehrabad M J, Foster A P, Dost R, Fox A M, Skolnick M S, Wilson L R 2020 Optica 7 1690Google Scholar

    [10]

    Rodríguez-Fortuño F J, Barber-Sanz I, Puerto D, Griol A, Martínez A 2014 ACS Photonics 1 762Google Scholar

    [11]

    Tang L, Tang J, Zhang W, Lu G, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Xia K, Xiao M 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 043833Google Scholar

    [12]

    Mahmoodian S, Prindal-Nielsen K, Söllner I, Søren S, Peter L 2017 Opt. Mater. Express 7 43Google Scholar

    [13]

    Coles R, Price D, Dixon J, Royall B, Clarke E, Kok P, Skolnick M, Fox A M, Makhonin M 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 11183Google Scholar

    [14]

    Barik S, Karasahin A, Flower C, Cai T, Miyake H, DeGottardi W, Hafezi M, Waks E 2018 Science 359 666Google Scholar

    [15]

    Xiao S, Wu S Y, Xie X, Yang J N, Wei W Q, Shi S S, Song F L, Sun S B, Dang J C, Yang L L, Wang Y N, Zuo Z C, Wang T, Zhang J J, Xu X L 2021 Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 091106Google Scholar

    [16]

    Xiao S, Wu S Y, Xie X, Yang J N, Wei W Q, Shi S S, Song F L, Dang J C, Sun S B, Yang L L, Wang Y N, Yan S, Zuo Z C, Wang T, Zhang J J, Jin K J, Xu X L 2021 Laser Photonics Rev. 8 2100009Google Scholar

    [17]

    Shen Y, Bradford M, Shen J T 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 173902Google Scholar

    [18]

    Yan W B, Ni W Y, Zhang J, Zhang F Y, Fan H 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 043852Google Scholar

    [19]

    Javadi A, Söllner I, Arcari M, Hansen S L, Midolo L, Mahmoodian S, Kiršanskė G, Pregnolato T, Lee E H, Song J D, Stobbe S, Lodahl P 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 8655Google Scholar

    [20]

    Javadi A, Ding D P, Appel M H, Mahmoodian S, Löbl M C, Söllner I, Schott R, Papon C, Pregnolato T, Stobbe S, Midolo L, Schröder T, Wieck A D, Ludwig A, Warburton R, Lodahl P 2018 Nat. Nanotechnol. 13 398Google Scholar

    [21]

    Li T, Miranowicz A, Hu X, Xia K, Nori F 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 062318Google Scholar

    [22]

    Yan C H, Li Y, Yuan H, Wei L F 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 023821Google Scholar

    [23]

    Tang J, Xu X L 2018 Chin. Phys. B 27 027804Google Scholar

    [24]

    Kiraz A, Atatüre M, Imamoğlu A 2004 Phys. Rev. A 69 032305Google Scholar

    [25]

    Xu X, Toft I, Phillips R T, Mar J, Hammura K, Williams D A 2007 Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 061103Google Scholar

    [26]

    Sapienza L, Davanço M, Badolato A, Srinivasan K 2015 Nat. Commun. 6 7833Google Scholar

    [27]

    Senellart P, Solomon G, White A 2017 Nat. Nanotechnol. 12 1026Google Scholar

    [28]

    Imamog A, Awschalom D D, Burkard G, DiVincenzo D P, Loss D, Sherwin M, Small A 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 4204Google Scholar

    [29]

    Gao W B, Fallahi P, Togan E, Miguel-Sánchez J, Imamoglu A 2012 Nature 491 426Google Scholar

    [30]

    Warburton R J 2013 Nat. Mater. 12 483Google Scholar

    [31]

    Qian C J, Wu S Y, Song F L, Peng K, Xie X, Yang J N, Xiao S, Steer M J, Thayne I G, Tang C C, Zuo Z C, Jin K J, Gu C Z, Xu X L 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 213901Google Scholar

    [32]

    Qian C J, Xie X, Yang J N, Peng K, Wu S Y, Song F L, Sun S B, Dang J C, Yu Y, Steer M J, Thayne I G, Jin K J, Gu C Z, Xu X L 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 087401Google Scholar

    [33]

    Jun L, Qiong W, Le-Man K, Hao-Sheng Z 2010 Chin. Phys. B 19 030313Google Scholar

    [34]

    Wu S Y, Peng K, Xie X, Yang J N, Xiao S, Song F L, Dang J N, Sun S B, Yang L L, Wang Y N, Shi S S, He J J, Zuo Z C, Xu X L 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 14 014049Google Scholar

    [35]

    Cao S, Tang J, Gao Y N, Sun Y, Qiu K S, Zhao Y H, He M, Shi J A, Gu L, Williams D A, W D, Jin K J, Xu X L 2015 Sci. Rep. 5 8041Google Scholar

    [36]

    Fu Y J, Lin S D, Tsai M F, Lin H, Lin C H, Chou H Y, Cheng S J, Chang W H 2010 Phys. Rev. B 81 113307Google Scholar

    [37]

    Lin T C, Li L C, Lin S D, Suen Y W, Lee C P 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 110 013522Google Scholar

    [38]

    Cao S, Tang J, Sun Y, Peng K, GaoY N, Zhao Y H, Qian C J, Sun S B, Ali H, Shao Y T, Wu S Y, Song F L, Williams D A, Sheng W D, Jin K J, Xu X L 2016 Nano Res. 9 306Google Scholar

    [39]

    Bayer M, Walck S N, Reinecke T L, Forchel A 1998 Phys. Rev. B 57 6584Google Scholar

    [40]

    Schulhauser C, Haft D, Warburton R J, Karrai K, Govorov A O, Kalameitsev A V, Chaplik A, Schoenfeld W, Garcia J M, Petroff P M 2002 Phys. Rev. B 66 193303Google Scholar

    [41]

    Glazov M M, Ivchenko E L, Krebs O, Kowalik K, Voisin P 2007 Phys. Rev. B 76 193313Google Scholar

    [42]

    Tsai M F, Lin H, Lin C H, Lin S D, Wang S Y, Lo M C, Cheng S J, Lee M C, Chang W H 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 267402Google Scholar

  • [1] Pang Nai-Qi, Wang Yin, Ge Yong, Shi Bin-Jie, Yuan Shou-Qi, Sun Hong-Xiang. Broadband acoustic triggers based on multiport waveguide structures. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(16): 164301. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230594
    [2] Chen Yun-Tian, Wang Jing-Wei, Chen Wei-Jin, Xu Jing. Reciprocal waveguide coupled mode theory. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(15): 154206. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200194
    [3] Yu Peng, Wang Bao-Qing, Wu Xiao-Hu, Wang Wen-Hao, Xu Hong-Xing, Wang Zhi-Ming. Circular dichroism of honeycomb-shaped elliptical hole absorber. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(20): 207101. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200843
    [4] Zhou Xiao-Xi, Hu Chuan-Deng, Lu Wei-Xin, Lai Yun, Hou Bo. Numerical design of frequency-split Weyl points in Weyl metamaterial. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(15): 154204. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200195
    [5] Cheng Xin, Xue Wen-Rui, Wei Zhuang-Zhi, Dong Hui-Ying, Li Chang-Yong. Mode characteristic analysis of optical waveguides based on graphene-coated elliptical dielectric nanowire. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(5): 058101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182090
    [6] Peng Yan-Ling, Xue Wen-Rui, Wei Zhuang-Zhi, Li Chang-Yong. Mode properties analysis of graphene-coated asymmetric parallel dielectric nanowire waveguides. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(3): 038102. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172016
    [7] Wei Zhuang-Zhi, Xue Wen-Rui, Peng Yan-Ling, Cheng Xin, Li Chang-Yong. Modes characteristics analysis of THz waveguides based on three graphene-coated dielectric nanowires. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(10): 108101. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180036
    [8] Wang Chen, Xu Yi-Hong, Li Cheng, Lin Hai-Jun. Fabrication and characteristics of high performance SOI-based Ge PIN waveguide photodetector. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(19): 198502. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.198502
    [9] Zhang Hui-Yun, Liu Meng, Zhang Yu-Ping, Shen Duan-Long, Wu Zhi-Xin, Yin Yi-Heng, Li De-Hua. Research of continuous wave pumping waveguide to generate terahertz laser. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(2): 020702. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.020702
    [10] Eerdunchaolu, Bai Xu-Fang, Han Chao. Properties of the internal excited state of the strong-coupling magneto-bipolaron in a parabolic quantum dot. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(2): 027501. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.027501
    [11] Cao Yong-Jun, Jiang Xin. Characteristics and applications of line defect modes in two-dimensional magnonic crystals. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(8): 087501. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.087501
    [12] Wan Wen-Jian, Yin Rong, Tan Zhi-Yong, Wang Feng, Han Ying-Jun, Cao Jun-Cheng. Study of 2.9 THz quantum cascade laser based on bound-to-continuum transition. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(21): 210701. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.210701
    [13] Chen Yuan-Yuan, Zou Ren-Hua, Song Gang, Zhang Kai, Yu Li, Zhao Yu-Fang, Xiao Jing-Hua. The polarization characteristics of the excitation and emission of surface plasmon polarization in the Ag nanowires. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(24): 247301. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.247301
    [14] Cao Yong-Jun, Tan Wei, Liu Yan. Coupling characteristics of point defect modes in two-dimensional magnonic crystals. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(11): 117501. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.117501
    [15] Yao Zhi-Dong, Li Wei, Gao Xian-Long. Electronic properties on the point vacancy of armchair edged graphene quantum dots. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(11): 117105. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.117105
    [16] Li Hua, Han Ying-Jun, Tan Zhi-Yong, Zhang Rong, Cao Jun-Cheng. Device fabrication of semi-insulating surface-plasmon terahertz quantum-cascade lasers. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(3): 2169-2172. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.2169
    [17] Sheng Zheng, Huang Si-Xun, Zeng Guo-Dong. Ocean duct inversion from radar clutter using Bayesian-Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(6): 4335-4341. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.4335
    [18] Sheng Zheng, Huang Si-Xun. Ocean duct inversion using radar clutter and its noise restraining ability. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(6): 4328-4334. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.4328
    [19] Yin Hai-Rong, Gong Yu-Bin, Wei Yan-Yu, Lu Zhi-Gang, Gong Hua-Rong, Yue Ling-Na, Huang Min-Zhi, Wang Wen-Xiang. Full-mode analysis of a two-dimensional photonic crystal waveguide. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(3): 1590-1597. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.1590
    [20] Zhang Hui-Lan, Zhang Guang-Yong, Wang Cheng, Liu Shi-Xiong, Liu Jin-Song. Waveguide induced by bright holographic solitons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(1): 236-239. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.236
Metrics
  • Abstract views:  2942
  • PDF Downloads:  90
  • Cited By: 0
Publishing process
  • Received Date:  07 October 2021
  • Accepted Date:  09 November 2021
  • Available Online:  26 January 2022
  • Published Online:  20 March 2022

/

返回文章
返回