Quark matter and quark star in color-flavor-locked phase

Chu Peng-Cheng; Liu He; Du Xian-Bin

doi:10.7498/aps.73.20231649

Abstract

In this work, we investigate the thermodynamical properties of strange quark matter (SQM) and color-flavor-locked (CFL) quark matter under strong magnetic fields by using a quasiparticle model. We calculate the energy density and the corresponding anisotropic pressure of both SQM and CFL quark matter. Our results indicate that CFL quark matter exhibits greater stability than the SQM, and the pressure of CFL quark matter increases with the energy gap constant $\varDelta $ increasing. We also observe that the oscillation effects coming from the lowest Landau level can be reduced by increasing the energy gap constant $ \varDelta $, which cannot be observed in SQM under a similar strong magnetic field. The equivalent quark mass for u, d, and s quark and the chemical potential for each flavor of quarks decrease with the energy gap constant $ \varDelta $ increasing, which matches the conclusion that CFL quark matter is more stable than SQM. From the calculations of the magnetars with SQM and CFL quark matter, we find that the maximum mass of magnetars increases with the energy gap constant $\varDelta $ increasing for both the longitudinal and the transverse orientation distribution of magnetic field. Additionally, the tidal deformability of the magnetars increases with the $\varDelta $ increasing. On the other hand, the central baryon density of the maximum mass of the magnetars decreases with the $\varDelta $ increasing. The results also indicate that the mass-radius lines of the CFL quark star can also satisfy the new estimates of the mass-radius region from PSR J0740 + 6620, PSR J0030 + 0451, and HESS J1731-347.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

School of Science, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China

Corresponding author: Chu Peng-Cheng, kyois@126.com ; Liu He, liuhe@qut.edu.cn ;

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11975132, 12205158, 11505100) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China(Grant Nos. ZR2022JQ04, ZR2021QA037, ZR2019YQ01).

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Glendenning N K 2000 Compact Stars (2nd Ed.) (New York: Spinger-Verlag, Inc.
[2]	Weber F 1999 Pulsars as Astrophyical Laboratories for Nuclear and Particle Physics (London: IOP Publishing Ltd.
[3]	Lattimer J M, Prakash M 2004 Science 304 536 Google Scholar
[4]	Steiner A W, Prakash M, Lattimer J M, Ellis P J 2005 Phys. Rep. 410 325 Google Scholar
[5]	Demorest P 2010 Nature 467 1081 Google Scholar
[6]	Antoniadis J 2013 Science 340 6131 Google Scholar
[7]	Shahbaz T, Casares J 2018 Astrophys. J. 859 54 Google Scholar
[8]	Cromartie H T, Fonseca E, Ransom S M et al. 2020 Nat. Astron. Lett. 4 72
[9]	Fonseca E, Cromartie H T, Pennucci T T, et al. 2021 Astrophys. J. Lett. 915 L12 Google Scholar
[10]	Miller M C, Lamb F K, Dittmann A J, et al. 2021 Astrophys. J. Lett. 918 L28 Google Scholar
[11]	Abbott R 2020 Astrophys. J. Lett. 896 L44 Google Scholar
[12]	Ivanenko D, Kurdgelaidze D F 1969 Lett. Nuovo Cimento 2 13 Google Scholar
[13]	Itoh N 1970 Prog. Theor. Phys. 44 291 Google Scholar
[14]	Bodmer A R 1971 Phys. Rev. D 4 1601 Google Scholar
[15]	Witten E 1984 Phys. Rev. D 30 272 Google Scholar
[16]	Farhi E, Jaffe R L 1984 Phys. Rev. D 30 2379 Google Scholar
[17]	Alcock C, Farh E, Olinto A 1986 Astrophys. J. 310 261 Google Scholar
[18]	Weber F 2005 Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 54 193 Google Scholar
[19]	Bombaci I, Parenti I, Vidana I 2004 Astrophys. J. 614 314 Google Scholar
[20]	Staff J, Ouyed R, Bagchi M 2007 Astrophys. J. 667 340 Google Scholar
[21]	Herzog T M, Röpke F K 2011 Phys. Rev. D 84 083002 Google Scholar
[22]	Stephanov M A, Rajagopal K, Shuryak E V 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 4816 Google Scholar
[23]	Terazawa H 1979 INS-Report (Tokyo: Univ. of Tokyo) p336
[24]	Alford M, Reddy S 2003 Phys. Rev. D 67 074024 Google Scholar
[25]	Alford M, Jotwani P, Kouvaris C, Kundu J, Rajagopal K 2005 Phys. Rev. D 71 114011 Google Scholar
[26]	Baldo M 2003 Phys. Lett. B 562 153 Google Scholar
[27]	Ippolito N D, Ruggieri M, Rischke D H, Sedrakian A, Weber F 2008 Phys. Rev. D 77 023004 Google Scholar
[28]	Lai X Y, Xu R X 2011 Res. Astron. Astrophys. 11 687 Google Scholar
[29]	Avellar M G B de, Horvath J E, Paulucci L 2011 Phys. Rev. D 84 043004 Google Scholar
[30]	Bonanno L, Sedrakian A 2012 A&A 539 A16 Google Scholar
[31]	Chu P C, Wang B, Jia Y Y, Dong Y M, Wang S M, Li X H, Zhang L, Zhang X M, Ma H Y 2016 Phys. Rev. D 94 123014 Google Scholar
[32]	Chu P C, Li X H, Wang B, Dong Y M, Jia Y Y, Wang S M, Ma H Y 2017 Eur. Phys. J. C 77 512 Google Scholar
[33]	Chu P C, Zhou Y, Chen C, Li X H, Ma H Y 2020 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 47 085201 Google Scholar
[34]	Bailin D and Love A 1984 Phys. Rep. 107 325 Google Scholar
[35]	Alford M G, Rajagopal K, Reddy S, Wilczek F 2001 Phys. Rev. D 64 074017 Google Scholar
[36]	Shovkovy I A 2005 Found. Phys. 35 1309 Google Scholar
[37]	Rajagopal K, Wilczek F 2001 Phys. Rev. L 86 3492 Google Scholar
[38]	Alford M G, Rajagopal K, Schaefer T, Schmitt A 2008 Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 1455 Google Scholar
[39]	Lugones G, Horvath J E 2003 Astron. Astrophys. 403 173 Google Scholar
[40]	Horvath J E, Lugones G 2004 Astron. Astrophys. 422 L1 Google Scholar
[41]	Woltjer L 1964 Astrophys. J. 140 1309 Google Scholar
[42]	Mihara T A 1990 Nature 346 250 Google Scholar
[43]	Chanmugam G 1992 Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 30 143 Google Scholar
[44]	Lai D, Shapiro S L 1991 Astrophys. J. 383 745 Google Scholar
[45]	Ferrer E J, Incera V, Keith J P, Portillo I, Springsteen P L 2010 Phys. Rev. C 82 065802 Google Scholar
[46]	Bandyopadhyay D, Chakrabarty S, Pal S 1997 Phys Rev. Lett. 79 2176 Google Scholar
[47]	Bandyopadhyay D, Pal S, Chakrabarty S 1998 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 24 1647 Google Scholar
[48]	Menezes D P, Pinto M, Benghi, Avancini S, Providência C 2009 Phys. Rev. C 79 035807 Google Scholar
[49]	Menezes D P, Pinto M, Benghi, Avancini S, Providência C 2009 Phys. Rev. C 80 065805 Google Scholar
[50]	Ryu C Y, Kim K S, Cheoun Myung-Ki 2010 Phys. Rev. C 82 025804 Google Scholar
[51]	Ryu C Y, Cheoun Myung-Ki, Kajino T, Maruyama T, Mathews Grant J 2012 Astropart. Phys. 38 25 Google Scholar
[52]	Li X H, Gao Z F, Li X D, Xu Y, Wang P, WangN, Peng Q H 2016 Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 25(1) 1650002 Google Scholar
[53]	Gao Z F, Wang N, Shan H, L i, X D, Wang W 2017 Astrophys. J. 849 19 Google Scholar
[54]	Deng Z L, Gao Z F, Li X D, Shao Y 2020 Astrophys. J. 892 4 Google Scholar
[55]	Yan F Z, Gao Z F, Yang W S, Dong A J 2021 Astron. Nachr. 342 249 Google Scholar
[56]	Wang H, Gao Z F, Jia H Y, Wang N, Li X 2020 Universe 6 63 Google Scholar
[57]	Li B P, Gao Z F 2023 Astron. Nachr. 344 e20220111
[58]	Deng Z L, Li X D, Gao Z F, Shao Y 2021 Astrophys. J. 909 174 Google Scholar
[59]	G ao, Z F, Omar N, Shi X C, Wang N 2019 Astron. Nachr. 340 1030 Google Scholar
[60]	Lander, S K 2023 Astrophys.J. 947 L16 Google Scholar
[61]	Dong J M 2021 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 500 1505
[62]	Fu G Z, Xing C C, Wang N 2020 Eur. Phys. J. C 80 582 Google Scholar
[63]	Schertler K, Greiner C, Thoma M H, Schertler K, Greiner C, Thoma M H 1997 Nucl. Phys. A 616 659 Google Scholar
[64]	Pisarski R D 1989 Nucl. Phys. A 498 423
[65]	Wen X J 2009 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 36 025011 Google Scholar
[66]	Zhang Z, Chu P C, Li X H, Liu H, Zhang X M 2021 Phys. Rev. D 103 103021 Google Scholar
[67]	Chu P C, Chen L W 2014 Astrophys. J. 780 135 Google Scholar
[68]	Chu P C 2018 Phys. Lett. B 778 447 Google Scholar
[69]	Chu P C, Chen L W 2017 Phys. Rev. D 96 103001 Google Scholar
[70]	Chodos A, Jaffe R L, Ohnson K, Thorn C B, Weisskopf V F 1974 Phys. Rev. D 9 3471 Google Scholar
[71]	Alford M, Braby M, Paris M, Reddy S 2005 Astrophys. J. 629 969 Google Scholar
[72]	Rehberg P, Klevansky S P, Hüfner J 1996 Phys. Rev. C 53 410 Google Scholar
[73]	Hanauske M, Satarov L M, Mishustin I N, Stocker H, Greiner W 2001 Phys. Rev. D 64 043005 Google Scholar
[74]	Rüster S B, Rischke D H 2004 Phys. Rev. D 69 045011 Google Scholar
[75]	Menezes D P, Providencia C, Melrose D B 2006 J. Phys. G 32 1081 Google Scholar
[76]	Chao J Y, Chu P C, Huang M 2013 Phys. Rev. D 88 054009 Google Scholar
[77]	Chu P C, Wang X, Chen L W, Huang M 2015 Phys. Rev. D 91 023003 Google Scholar
[78]	Chu P C, Wang B, Ma H Y, Dong Y M, Chang S L, Zheng C H, Liu J T, Zhang X M 2016 Phys. Rev. D 93 094032 Google Scholar
[79]	Chu P C, Chen L W 2017 Phys. Rev. D 96 083019 Google Scholar
[80]	Roberts C D, Williams A G 1994 Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 33 477 Google Scholar
[81]	Zong H S, Chang L, Hou F Y, Sun W M, Liu Y X 2005 Phys. Rev. C 71 015205 Google Scholar
[82]	Peng G X, Chiang H C, Yang J J, Li L, Liu B 1999 Phys. Rev. C 61 015201 Google Scholar
[83]	Peng G X, Chiang H C, Zou B S, Ning P Z, Luo S J 2000 Phys. Rev. C 62 025801 Google Scholar
[84]	Peng G X, Li A, Lombardo U 2008 Phys. Rev. C 77 065807 Google Scholar
[85]	Li A, Peng G X, Lu J F 2011 Res. Astron. Astrophys. 11 482 Google Scholar
[86]	Schertler K, Greiner C, Thoma M H 1997 Nucl. Phys. A 616 659
[87]	Schertler K, Greiner C, Sahu P K, Thoma M H 1998 Nucl. Phys. A 637 451
[88]	Alford M, Kouvaris C, Rajagopal K 2005 Phys. Rev. D 71 054009 Google Scholar
[89]	Giannakis I, Hou D, Ren H C, et al. 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 232301 Google Scholar
[90]	董爱军, 高志福, 杨晓峰等 2023 物理学报 72 030502 Google Scholar Dong A J, Gao Z F, Yang X F, et al 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 030502 Google Scholar
[91]	Ferrer E J, Vivian de la Incera 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 152002 Google Scholar
[92]	Ferrer E J, Vivian de la Incera, Cristina Manuel 2006 Nucl. Phys. B 747 88 Google Scholar
[93]	Feng B, Ferrer E J, Vivian de la Incera 2011 Nucl. Phys. B 853 213 Google Scholar
[94]	Paulucci L, Ferrer E J, Vivian de la Incera, Horvath J E 2011 Phys. Rev. D 83 043009 Google Scholar
[95]	Isayev A A, Yang J 2011 Phys. Rev. C 84 065802 Google Scholar
[96]	Isayev A A, Yang J 2012 Phys. Lett. B 707 163 Google Scholar
[97]	Isayev A A, Yang J 2013 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 40 035105 Google Scholar
[98]	Feng B, Hou D F, Ren H C, Wu P P 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 042001 Google Scholar
[99]	Oppenheimer J R, Volkoff G M 1939 Phys. Rev. 33 374
[100]	Gao Z F, Li X D, Wang N, Yuan J P, Wang P, Peng Q H, Du Y J 2016 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 456 55 Google Scholar
[101]	Gao Z F, Wang N, Peng Q H, Li X D, Du Y J 2013 Mod. Phys. Lett. A 28 1350138 Google Scholar
[102]	Chu P C, Chen L W, Wang X 2014 Phys. Rev. D 90 063013 Google Scholar
[103]	Miller M C, Lamb F K, Dittmannet A J, et al. 2019 Astrophys. J. Lett. 887 L24 Google Scholar
[104]	Doroshenko V, Suleimanov V, Pühlhofer G, Santangelo A 2022 Nat. Astron. 6 1444 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 $ \varDelta = 50 $ MeV时色味锁夸克物质的能量密度随重子数密度与磁场的变化

Figure 1. Energy density of CFL quark matter as functions of baryon density and magnetic field with $ \varDelta = 50 $ MeV.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 $ \varDelta = 100 $ MeV时色味锁夸克物质的能量密度随重子数密度与磁场的变化

Figure 2. Energy density of CFL quark matter as functions of baryon density and magnetic field with $ \varDelta = 100 $ MeV.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 $ \varDelta = 50 $ MeV时色味锁夸克物质的压强随重子数密度与磁场的变化

Figure 3. Pressure of CFL quark matter as functions of baryon density and magnetic field with $ \varDelta = 50 $ MeV.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 $ \varDelta = 100 $ MeV时色味锁夸克物质的压强随重子数密度与磁场的变化

Figure 4. Pressure of CFL quark matter as functions of baryon density and magnetic field with $ \varDelta = 100 $ MeV.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 $ \varDelta = 50 $ MeV和$ \varDelta = 100 $ MeV时色味锁夸克物质的压强不对称度随磁场的变化

Figure 5. Pressure anisotropy of CFL quark matter as functions of magnetic field with $ \varDelta = 50, 100 $ MeV.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 $ \varDelta = 50 $ MeV和$ \varDelta = 100 $ MeV时u, d, s三味夸克的有效质量随磁场的变化规律

Figure 6. Equivalent quark mass for u, d, and s quarks as functions of magnetic fields B with $ \varDelta = 50 $ MeV and $ \varDelta = 100 $ MeV.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 7 $ \varDelta = 50 $ MeV和$ \varDelta = 100 $ MeV时u, d, s三味夸克的化学势随磁场的变化规律

Figure 7. Chemical potential of u, d, and s quarks as functions of magnetic fields B with $ \varDelta = 50 $ MeV and $ \varDelta = 100 $ MeV

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 8 磁场与零磁场下色味锁相夸克星质量半径关系

Figure 8. Mass-radius relation of QSs with CFL quark phase under magnetic fields.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 9 奇异夸克星与色味锁相磁星最大质量随磁场的变化关系

Figure 9. Maximum star mass of magnetars as a function of magnetic field $ B_0 $ with SQM and CFL quark phase by considering transverse magnetic field orientation and longitudinal orientation.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

表 1 不同磁场方向分布情况下($ B_0 = 4\times \text{10}^{18} $G)磁星最大质量中心密度、1.4倍太阳质量潮汐形变率随Δ的变化

Table 1. The central density and tidal deformability of the magnetars considering “radial orientation” and “transverse orientation” at $ B_0 = 4\times \text{10}^{18} $G with g-2 within quasiparticle model with different Δ.

$ B_{{/ /}} $ $ B_{{/ /}} $ $ B_{\perp} $ $ B_{\perp} $

Δ/MeV 50 100 50 100

$ n_{\mathrm{c}} $/$ \text{fm}^{-3} $ 0.95 0.82 0.91 0.8

$ \varLambda_{1.4} $/MeV 741 1256 805 1351

DownLoad: CSV

[1]	Glendenning N K 2000 Compact Stars (2nd Ed.) (New York: Spinger-Verlag, Inc.
[2]	Weber F 1999 Pulsars as Astrophyical Laboratories for Nuclear and Particle Physics (London: IOP Publishing Ltd.
[3]	Lattimer J M, Prakash M 2004 Science 304 536 Google Scholar
[4]	Steiner A W, Prakash M, Lattimer J M, Ellis P J 2005 Phys. Rep. 410 325 Google Scholar
[5]	Demorest P 2010 Nature 467 1081 Google Scholar
[6]	Antoniadis J 2013 Science 340 6131 Google Scholar
[7]	Shahbaz T, Casares J 2018 Astrophys. J. 859 54 Google Scholar
[8]	Cromartie H T, Fonseca E, Ransom S M et al. 2020 Nat. Astron. Lett. 4 72
[9]	Fonseca E, Cromartie H T, Pennucci T T, et al. 2021 Astrophys. J. Lett. 915 L12 Google Scholar
[10]	Miller M C, Lamb F K, Dittmann A J, et al. 2021 Astrophys. J. Lett. 918 L28 Google Scholar
[11]	Abbott R 2020 Astrophys. J. Lett. 896 L44 Google Scholar
[12]	Ivanenko D, Kurdgelaidze D F 1969 Lett. Nuovo Cimento 2 13 Google Scholar
[13]	Itoh N 1970 Prog. Theor. Phys. 44 291 Google Scholar
[14]	Bodmer A R 1971 Phys. Rev. D 4 1601 Google Scholar
[15]	Witten E 1984 Phys. Rev. D 30 272 Google Scholar
[16]	Farhi E, Jaffe R L 1984 Phys. Rev. D 30 2379 Google Scholar
[17]	Alcock C, Farh E, Olinto A 1986 Astrophys. J. 310 261 Google Scholar
[18]	Weber F 2005 Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 54 193 Google Scholar
[19]	Bombaci I, Parenti I, Vidana I 2004 Astrophys. J. 614 314 Google Scholar
[20]	Staff J, Ouyed R, Bagchi M 2007 Astrophys. J. 667 340 Google Scholar
[21]	Herzog T M, Röpke F K 2011 Phys. Rev. D 84 083002 Google Scholar
[22]	Stephanov M A, Rajagopal K, Shuryak E V 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 4816 Google Scholar
[23]	Terazawa H 1979 INS-Report (Tokyo: Univ. of Tokyo) p336
[24]	Alford M, Reddy S 2003 Phys. Rev. D 67 074024 Google Scholar
[25]	Alford M, Jotwani P, Kouvaris C, Kundu J, Rajagopal K 2005 Phys. Rev. D 71 114011 Google Scholar
[26]	Baldo M 2003 Phys. Lett. B 562 153 Google Scholar
[27]	Ippolito N D, Ruggieri M, Rischke D H, Sedrakian A, Weber F 2008 Phys. Rev. D 77 023004 Google Scholar
[28]	Lai X Y, Xu R X 2011 Res. Astron. Astrophys. 11 687 Google Scholar
[29]	Avellar M G B de, Horvath J E, Paulucci L 2011 Phys. Rev. D 84 043004 Google Scholar
[30]	Bonanno L, Sedrakian A 2012 A&A 539 A16 Google Scholar
[31]	Chu P C, Wang B, Jia Y Y, Dong Y M, Wang S M, Li X H, Zhang L, Zhang X M, Ma H Y 2016 Phys. Rev. D 94 123014 Google Scholar
[32]	Chu P C, Li X H, Wang B, Dong Y M, Jia Y Y, Wang S M, Ma H Y 2017 Eur. Phys. J. C 77 512 Google Scholar
[33]	Chu P C, Zhou Y, Chen C, Li X H, Ma H Y 2020 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 47 085201 Google Scholar
[34]	Bailin D and Love A 1984 Phys. Rep. 107 325 Google Scholar
[35]	Alford M G, Rajagopal K, Reddy S, Wilczek F 2001 Phys. Rev. D 64 074017 Google Scholar
[36]	Shovkovy I A 2005 Found. Phys. 35 1309 Google Scholar
[37]	Rajagopal K, Wilczek F 2001 Phys. Rev. L 86 3492 Google Scholar
[38]	Alford M G, Rajagopal K, Schaefer T, Schmitt A 2008 Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 1455 Google Scholar
[39]	Lugones G, Horvath J E 2003 Astron. Astrophys. 403 173 Google Scholar
[40]	Horvath J E, Lugones G 2004 Astron. Astrophys. 422 L1 Google Scholar
[41]	Woltjer L 1964 Astrophys. J. 140 1309 Google Scholar
[42]	Mihara T A 1990 Nature 346 250 Google Scholar
[43]	Chanmugam G 1992 Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 30 143 Google Scholar
[44]	Lai D, Shapiro S L 1991 Astrophys. J. 383 745 Google Scholar
[45]	Ferrer E J, Incera V, Keith J P, Portillo I, Springsteen P L 2010 Phys. Rev. C 82 065802 Google Scholar
[46]	Bandyopadhyay D, Chakrabarty S, Pal S 1997 Phys Rev. Lett. 79 2176 Google Scholar
[47]	Bandyopadhyay D, Pal S, Chakrabarty S 1998 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 24 1647 Google Scholar
[48]	Menezes D P, Pinto M, Benghi, Avancini S, Providência C 2009 Phys. Rev. C 79 035807 Google Scholar
[49]	Menezes D P, Pinto M, Benghi, Avancini S, Providência C 2009 Phys. Rev. C 80 065805 Google Scholar
[50]	Ryu C Y, Kim K S, Cheoun Myung-Ki 2010 Phys. Rev. C 82 025804 Google Scholar
[51]	Ryu C Y, Cheoun Myung-Ki, Kajino T, Maruyama T, Mathews Grant J 2012 Astropart. Phys. 38 25 Google Scholar
[52]	Li X H, Gao Z F, Li X D, Xu Y, Wang P, WangN, Peng Q H 2016 Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 25(1) 1650002 Google Scholar
[53]	Gao Z F, Wang N, Shan H, L i, X D, Wang W 2017 Astrophys. J. 849 19 Google Scholar
[54]	Deng Z L, Gao Z F, Li X D, Shao Y 2020 Astrophys. J. 892 4 Google Scholar
[55]	Yan F Z, Gao Z F, Yang W S, Dong A J 2021 Astron. Nachr. 342 249 Google Scholar
[56]	Wang H, Gao Z F, Jia H Y, Wang N, Li X 2020 Universe 6 63 Google Scholar
[57]	Li B P, Gao Z F 2023 Astron. Nachr. 344 e20220111
[58]	Deng Z L, Li X D, Gao Z F, Shao Y 2021 Astrophys. J. 909 174 Google Scholar
[59]	G ao, Z F, Omar N, Shi X C, Wang N 2019 Astron. Nachr. 340 1030 Google Scholar
[60]	Lander, S K 2023 Astrophys.J. 947 L16 Google Scholar
[61]	Dong J M 2021 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 500 1505
[62]	Fu G Z, Xing C C, Wang N 2020 Eur. Phys. J. C 80 582 Google Scholar
[63]	Schertler K, Greiner C, Thoma M H, Schertler K, Greiner C, Thoma M H 1997 Nucl. Phys. A 616 659 Google Scholar
[64]	Pisarski R D 1989 Nucl. Phys. A 498 423
[65]	Wen X J 2009 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 36 025011 Google Scholar
[66]	Zhang Z, Chu P C, Li X H, Liu H, Zhang X M 2021 Phys. Rev. D 103 103021 Google Scholar
[67]	Chu P C, Chen L W 2014 Astrophys. J. 780 135 Google Scholar
[68]	Chu P C 2018 Phys. Lett. B 778 447 Google Scholar
[69]	Chu P C, Chen L W 2017 Phys. Rev. D 96 103001 Google Scholar
[70]	Chodos A, Jaffe R L, Ohnson K, Thorn C B, Weisskopf V F 1974 Phys. Rev. D 9 3471 Google Scholar
[71]	Alford M, Braby M, Paris M, Reddy S 2005 Astrophys. J. 629 969 Google Scholar
[72]	Rehberg P, Klevansky S P, Hüfner J 1996 Phys. Rev. C 53 410 Google Scholar
[73]	Hanauske M, Satarov L M, Mishustin I N, Stocker H, Greiner W 2001 Phys. Rev. D 64 043005 Google Scholar
[74]	Rüster S B, Rischke D H 2004 Phys. Rev. D 69 045011 Google Scholar
[75]	Menezes D P, Providencia C, Melrose D B 2006 J. Phys. G 32 1081 Google Scholar
[76]	Chao J Y, Chu P C, Huang M 2013 Phys. Rev. D 88 054009 Google Scholar
[77]	Chu P C, Wang X, Chen L W, Huang M 2015 Phys. Rev. D 91 023003 Google Scholar
[78]	Chu P C, Wang B, Ma H Y, Dong Y M, Chang S L, Zheng C H, Liu J T, Zhang X M 2016 Phys. Rev. D 93 094032 Google Scholar
[79]	Chu P C, Chen L W 2017 Phys. Rev. D 96 083019 Google Scholar
[80]	Roberts C D, Williams A G 1994 Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 33 477 Google Scholar
[81]	Zong H S, Chang L, Hou F Y, Sun W M, Liu Y X 2005 Phys. Rev. C 71 015205 Google Scholar
[82]	Peng G X, Chiang H C, Yang J J, Li L, Liu B 1999 Phys. Rev. C 61 015201 Google Scholar
[83]	Peng G X, Chiang H C, Zou B S, Ning P Z, Luo S J 2000 Phys. Rev. C 62 025801 Google Scholar
[84]	Peng G X, Li A, Lombardo U 2008 Phys. Rev. C 77 065807 Google Scholar
[85]	Li A, Peng G X, Lu J F 2011 Res. Astron. Astrophys. 11 482 Google Scholar
[86]	Schertler K, Greiner C, Thoma M H 1997 Nucl. Phys. A 616 659
[87]	Schertler K, Greiner C, Sahu P K, Thoma M H 1998 Nucl. Phys. A 637 451
[88]	Alford M, Kouvaris C, Rajagopal K 2005 Phys. Rev. D 71 054009 Google Scholar
[89]	Giannakis I, Hou D, Ren H C, et al. 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 232301 Google Scholar
[90]	董爱军, 高志福, 杨晓峰等 2023 物理学报 72 030502 Google Scholar Dong A J, Gao Z F, Yang X F, et al 2023 Acta Phys. Sin. 72 030502 Google Scholar
[91]	Ferrer E J, Vivian de la Incera 2005 Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 152002 Google Scholar
[92]	Ferrer E J, Vivian de la Incera, Cristina Manuel 2006 Nucl. Phys. B 747 88 Google Scholar
[93]	Feng B, Ferrer E J, Vivian de la Incera 2011 Nucl. Phys. B 853 213 Google Scholar
[94]	Paulucci L, Ferrer E J, Vivian de la Incera, Horvath J E 2011 Phys. Rev. D 83 043009 Google Scholar
[95]	Isayev A A, Yang J 2011 Phys. Rev. C 84 065802 Google Scholar
[96]	Isayev A A, Yang J 2012 Phys. Lett. B 707 163 Google Scholar
[97]	Isayev A A, Yang J 2013 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 40 035105 Google Scholar
[98]	Feng B, Hou D F, Ren H C, Wu P P 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 042001 Google Scholar
[99]	Oppenheimer J R, Volkoff G M 1939 Phys. Rev. 33 374
[100]	Gao Z F, Li X D, Wang N, Yuan J P, Wang P, Peng Q H, Du Y J 2016 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 456 55 Google Scholar
[101]	Gao Z F, Wang N, Peng Q H, Li X D, Du Y J 2013 Mod. Phys. Lett. A 28 1350138 Google Scholar
[102]	Chu P C, Chen L W, Wang X 2014 Phys. Rev. D 90 063013 Google Scholar
[103]	Miller M C, Lamb F K, Dittmannet A J, et al. 2019 Astrophys. J. Lett. 887 L24 Google Scholar
[104]	Doroshenko V, Suleimanov V, Pühlhofer G, Santangelo A 2022 Nat. Astron. 6 1444 Google Scholar

[1]	Ruan Li-Juan, Xu Zhang-Bu, Yang Chi. Global polarization of hyperons and spin alignment of vector mesons in quark matters. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(11): 112401. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230496
[2]	Dong Ai-Jun, Gao Zhi-Fu, Yang Xiao-Feng, Wang Na, Liu Chang, Peng Qiu-He. Modified pressure of relativistic electrons in a superhigh magnetic field. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(3): 030502. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20220092
[3]	Zhou Shu-Ying, Shen Wan-Ping, Mao Hong. Analytical solution of surface tension of quark-hadron phase transition. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(21): 211101. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220659
[4]	Wang Yi-Nong, Chu Peng-Cheng, Jiang Yao-Yao, Pang Xiao-Di, Wang Sheng-Bo, Li Pei-Xin. Proto-magnetars within quasiparticle model. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(22): 222101. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220795
[5]	Gong Wu-Kun, Guo Wen-Jun. Hadron-quark deconfinement phase transition in hybrid stars. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(24): 242101. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200925
[6]	Shen Wan-Ping, You Shi-Jia, Mao Hong. Phase structure and surface tension in quark meson model. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(18): 181101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190798
[7]	Chen Jian-Ling, Wang Hui, Jia Huan-Yu, Ma Zi-Wei, Li Yong-Hong, Tan Jun. Conductivity of neutron star crust under superhigh magnetic fields and Ohmic decay of toroidal magnetic field of magnetar. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(18): 180401. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190760
[8]	Jirimutu, Aodeng, Xue Kang. Construction of Breit quark potential in coordinate space and mass splits of meson and quarkonium. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(9): 091201. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20172155
[9]	Zhao Yun-Hui, Hai Wen-Hua, Zhu Qian-Quan. Multi-order corrections of variational-integral perturbation for heavy quarkonium. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(2): 734-739. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.734
[10]	Huang Jin-Shu, Luo Peng-Hui, Lu Gong-Ru. Bottom quark pair production in γγ collision. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(12): 8166-8173. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.8166
[11]	Lai Xiang-Jun, Luo Zhi-Quan, Liu Jing-Jing, Liu Hong-Lin. Quark phase transition in supernova and the effect of quark mass on the process. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(3): 1535-1541. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.1535
[12]	Chen Hong, Mei Hua, Shen Peng-Nian, Jiang Huan-Qing. Heavy quarkonium mass spectra in a relativistic quark model. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(3): 1136-1141. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.1136
[13]	He Ze-Jun, Long Jia-Li, Ma Guo-Liang, Ma Yu-Gang, Zhang Jia-Ju, Liu Bo. Intermediate mass dilepton production in a chemically non-equilibrated quark-glu on matter. Acta Physica Sinica, 2003, 52(11): 2831-2835. doi: 10.7498/aps.52.2831
[14]	He Ze-Jun, Zhou Wen-Jie, Jiang Wei-Zhou, Zhang Jia-Ju, Liu Bo. . Acta Physica Sinica, 2002, 51(6): 1312-1316. doi: 10.7498/aps.51.1312
[15]	DAI ZI-GAO, LU TAN, PENG QIU-HE. PHASE TRANSITION OF NONSTRANGE-STRANGE QUARK MATTER IN THE INTERIOR OF A NEUTRON STAR. Acta Physica Sinica, 1993, 42(8): 1210-1215. doi: 10.7498/aps.42.1210
[16]	BAO SHU-QING, XUE XIAO-ZHOU. SU(10) CHIRAL GRAND UNIFIED PREON MODEL. Acta Physica Sinica, 1988, 37(2): 347-352. doi: 10.7498/aps.37.347
[17]	XIE FENG-XIAN. CALCULATION OF THE SPECTRA FOR TOPPONIUM WITH A NONZERO GLUON EFFECTIVE MASS. Acta Physica Sinica, 1987, 36(6): 778-784. doi: 10.7498/aps.36.778
[18]	HE QI-ZHI, YANG JIAN-HUA, CHENG GUO-JUN, YANG RONG-FU. A SEARCH FOR π-N INTERACTION BY QUARK MODEL. Acta Physica Sinica, 1985, 34(1): 1-9. doi: 10.7498/aps.34.1
[19]	HE ZUO-XIU, LIN DA-HANG, ZHAO PEI-ZHEN. QUARKONIUM POTENTIAL MODEL WITH A NON-ZERO GLUON EFFECTIVE MASS. Acta Physica Sinica, 1982, 31(4): 525-531. doi: 10.7498/aps.31.525
[20]	WANG JIA-ZHU, BI PIN-ZHEN, YIN PENG-CHENG. PROLATE ELLIPSOLIDAL BAG MODEL FOR THE HADRON WITH HEAVY QUARKNIUM. Acta Physica Sinica, 1981, 30(12): 1707-1712. doi: 10.7498/aps.30.1707

Catalog

Vol. 73, Issue 5 - 2024-03-05

Metrics

Abstract views: 2075
PDF Downloads: 61
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板