-
In the case of continuous-variable quantum key distribution (CV-QKD) systems, synchronization is a key technology that ensures that both the transmitter and receiver obtain corresponding data synchronously. By designing an ingenious time sequence for the transmitter and receiver and using the peaking value acquisition technique and time domain heterodyne detection, we experimentally realize a four-state discrete modulation CV-QKD with a repetition rate of 10 MHz, transmitting over a distance of 25 km. With well-designed time sequence of hardware, Alice and Bob can obtain corresponding data automatically without using numerous software calculation methods. The secure key rates are calculated by using the method proposed by the Lütkenhaus group at the University of Waterloo in Canada. In the calculation, we first estimate the first and the second moment by using the measured quadratures of displaced thermal states, followed by calculating the secret key rate by using the convex optimization method through the reconstruction of the moments. There is no need to assume a linear quantum transmission channel to estimate the excess noise. Finally, secure key rates of 0.0022—0.0091 bit/pulse are achieved, and the excess noise is between 0.016 and 0.103. In this study, first, we introduce the prepare-and-measure scheme and the entanglement-based scheme of the four-state discrete modulation protocol. The Wigner images of the four coherent states on Alice’s side, and four displaced thermal states on Bob’s side are presented. Second, the design of hardware synchronization time series is introduced comprehensively. Third, the CV-QKD experiment setup is introduced and the time sequence is verified. Finally, the calculation method of secure key rate using the first and the second moment of quadrature is explained in detail. The phase space distribution of quadratures is also presented. The secret key rate ranges between 0.0022 and 0.0091 bits/pulse, and the equivalent excess noise are between 0.016 and 0.103. The average secret key bit rate is 24 kbit/s. During the experiment, the first and the second moment of the quantum state at the receiver end are found to fluctuate owing to the finite-size effect. This effect reduces the value of the secure key rate and limits the transmission distance of the CV-QKD system. In conclusion, four-state discrete modulation CV-QKD based on hardware synchronization is designed and demonstrated. The proposed hardware synchronization method can effectively reduce the cost, size, and power consumption. In the future, the finite-size effect will be investigated theoretically and experimentally to improve the performance of system. -
Keywords:
- continuous variable quantum key distribution /
- hardware synchronization /
- four-state discrete modulation /
- time domain heterodyne detection
[1] Xu F, Ma X, Zhang Q, Lo H K, Pan J W 2020 Rev. Mod. Phys. 92 025002Google Scholar
[2] Pirandola S, Andersen U L, Banchi L, Berta M, Bunandar D, Colbeck R, Englund D, Gehring T, Lupo C, Ottaviani, Pereira J L, Razavi M, Shamsul Shaari J, Tomamichel M, Usenko V C, Vallone G, Villoresi P, Wallden P 2020 Adv. Opt. Photonics 12 1012Google Scholar
[3] Fan-Yuan G J, Lu F L, Wang S, Yin Z Q, He D Y, Zhou Z, Teng J, Chen W, Guo G C, Han Z F 2021 Photonics Res. 9 1881Google Scholar
[4] Liu H, Jiang C, Zhu H T, Zou M, Yu Z W, Hu X L, Xu H, Ma S, Han Z, Chen J P, Dai Y, Tang S B, Zhang W, Li H, You L, Wang Z, Hua Y, Hu H, Zhang H, Zhou F, Zhang Q, Wang X B, Chen T Y, Pan J W 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 250502Google Scholar
[5] Grosshans F, Van Assche G, Wenger J, Brouri R, Cerf N J, Grangier P 2003 Nature 421 238Google Scholar
[6] Xu H, Hu X L, Jiang C, Yu Z W, Wang X B 2023 Phys. Rev. Res. 5 023069Google Scholar
[7] Jiang C, Yu Z W, Hu X L, Wang X B 2023 Natl. Sci. Rev. 10 186Google Scholar
[8] Yin J, Li Y H, Liao S K, Yang M, Cao Y, Zhang Y, Ren J G, Cai W Q, Liu W Y, Li S L, Shu R, Huang Y M, Deng L, Li L, Zhang Q, Liu N L, Chen Y A, Lu C Y, Wang X B, Xu F H, Wang J Y, Peng C Z, Ekert A K, Pan J W 2020 Nature 582 501Google Scholar
[9] Fang X T, Zeng P, Liu H, Zou M, Wu W J, Tang Y L, Sheng Y J, Zhang W, Li L, Li M J, Chen H A, Zhang Q, Peng C Z, Ma X, Chen T Y, Pan J W 2020 Nat. Photonics 14 422Google Scholar
[10] Zhu H T, Huang Y Z, Liu H, Zeng P, Zou M, Dai Y Q, Tang S B, Li H, You L X, Wang Z, Chen Y A, Ma X F, Chen T Y, Pan J W 2023 Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 030801Google Scholar
[11] Du Y Q, Zhu X, Hua X, Zhao Z G, Hu X, Qian Y, Xiao X, Wei K J 2023 Chip 2 100039Google Scholar
[12] Wei K J, Li W, Tan H, Li Y, Min H, Zhang W J, Li H, You L X, Wang Z, Jiang X, Chen T Y, Liao S K, Peng C Z, Xu F H, Pan J W 2020 Phys. Rev. X 10 031030Google Scholar
[13] Huang P, Wang T, Huang D, Zeng G H 2022 Symmetry 14 568Google Scholar
[14] Wang H, Pan Y, Shao Y, Pi Y D, Ye T, Li Y, Zhang T, Liu J L, Yang J, Ma L, Huang W, Xu B J 2023 Opt. Express 31 5577Google Scholar
[15] Sun S H, Xu F H 2021 New J. Phys. 23 023011Google Scholar
[16] Sun S H 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 022423Google Scholar
[17] Huang P, Huang J Z, Zhang Z S, Zeng G H 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 042311Google Scholar
[18] Zhang Y C, Li Z Y, Yu S, Gu W Y, Peng X, Guo H 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 052325Google Scholar
[19] Qi B, Gunther H, Evans P G, Williams B P, Camacho R M, Peters N A 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 13 054065Google Scholar
[20] Tian Y, Wang P, Liu J Q, Du S N, Liu W Y, Lu Z G, Wang X Y, Li Y M 2022 Optica 9 492Google Scholar
[21] Tian Y, Zhang Y, Liu S S, Wang P, Lu Z G, Wang X Y, Li Y M 2023 Opt. Lett. 48 2953Google Scholar
[22] Wang T, Xu Y, Zhao H, Li L, Huang P, Zeng G H 2023 Opt. Lett. 48 719Google Scholar
[23] Wang P, Zhang Y, Lu Z G, Wang X Y, Li Y M 2023 New J. Phys. 25 023019Google Scholar
[24] Du S N, Wang P, Liu J Q, Tian Y, Li Y M 2023 Photonics Res. 11 463Google Scholar
[25] Chen J P, Zhang C, Liu Y, Jiang C, Zhang W, Han Z Y, Ma S Z, Hu X L, Li Y H, Liu H, Zhou F, Jiang H F, Chen T Y, Li H, You L X, Wang Z, Wang X B, Zhang Q, Pan J W 2021 Nat. Photonics 15 570Google Scholar
[26] Wang S, Yin Z Q, He D Y, Chen W, Wang R Q, Ye P, Zhou Y, Fan-Yuan G J, Wang F X, Chen W, Zhu Y G, Morozov P V, Divochiy A V, Zhou Z, Guo G C, Han F Z 2022 Nat. Photonics 16 154Google Scholar
[27] Liu Y, Zhang W J, Jiang C, Chen J P, Zhang C, Pan W X, Ma D, Dong H, Xiong J M, Zhang C J, Li H, Chen T Y, You L X, Wang X B, Zhang Q, Pan J W 2023 Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 210801Google Scholar
[28] Pan Y, Wang H, Shao Y, Pi Y D, Liu B, Huang W, Xu B J 2022 Opt. Lett. 47 3307Google Scholar
[29] Wang H, Li Y, Pi Y D, Pan Y, Shao Y, Ma L, Zhang Y C, Yang J, Zhang Tao, Huang W, Xu B J 2022 Commun. Phys. 5 162Google Scholar
[30] Hajomer A A E, Bruynsteen C, Derkach I, Jain N, Bomhals A, Bastiaens S, Andersen U L, Yin X, Gehring T 2023 arXiv: 2305.19642v1[quant-ph]
[31] Zhang Y C, Chen Z Y, Pirandola S, Wang X Y, Zhou C, Chu B J, Zhao Y J, Xu B J, Yu S, Guo H 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 010502Google Scholar
[32] Zhang G, Haw J Y, Cai H, Xu F H, Assad S M, Fitzsimons J F, Zhou X, Zhang Y, Yu S, Wu J, Ser W, Kwek L C, Liu A Q 2019 Nat. Photonics 13 839Google Scholar
[33] Wang X Y, Jia Y X, Guo X B, Liu J Q, Wang S F, Liu W Y, Sun F Y, Zou J, Li Y M 2022 Chin. Opt. Lett. 20 041301Google Scholar
[34] Jia Y X, Wang X Y, Hu X, Hua X, Zhang Y, Guo X B, Zhang S X, Xiao X, Yu S H, Zou J, Li Y M 2023 New J. Phys. 25 103030Google Scholar
[35] Li L, Wang T, Li X H, Huang P, Guo Y Y, Lu L J, Zhou L J, Zeng G H 2023 Photonics Res. 11 504Google Scholar
[36] Leverrier A, Grangier P 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 180504Google Scholar
[37] Leverrier A, Grosshans F, Grangier P 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 062343Google Scholar
[38] Lin J, Upadhyaya T, Lutkenhaus N 2019 Phys. Rev. X 9 041064Google Scholar
[39] Ghorai S, Grangier P, Diamanti E, Leverrier A 2019 Phys. Rev. X 9 021059Google Scholar
[40] Lupo C, Ouyang Y K 2022 PRX Quantum 3 010341Google Scholar
[41] Ma H X, Huang P, Bai D Y, Wang T, Wang S Y, Bao W S, Zeng G H 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 022322Google Scholar
[42] Liu W B, Li C L, Xie Y M, Weng C X, Gu J, Cao X Y, Lu Y S, Li B H, Yin H L, Chen Z B 2021 PRX Quantum 2 040334Google Scholar
[43] Wang X Y, Bai Z L, Wang S F, Li Y M, Peng K C 2013 Chin. Phys. Lett. 30 010305Google Scholar
[44] Pereira D, Almeida M, Facao M F, Pinto A N, Silva N A 2022 Opt. Lett. 47 3948Google Scholar
[45] Kleis S, Rueckmann M, Schaeffe C G 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 1588Google Scholar
[46] Milovancev D, Vokic N, Laudenbach F, Pacher C, Hübel H, Schrenk B 2021 J. Lightwave Technol. 39 3445Google Scholar
[47] Li H S, Wang C, Huang P, Huang D, Wang T, Zeng G H 2016 Opt. Express 24 20481Google Scholar
[48] Wang C, Huang P, Huang D, Lin D K, Zeng G H 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 022315Google Scholar
[49] 刘友明, 汪超, 黄端, 黄鹏, 冯晓毅, 彭进业, 曹正文, 曾贵华 2015 光学学报 35 0106006Google Scholar
Liu Y M, Wang C, Huang D, Huang P, Feng X Y, Peng J Y, Cao Z W, Zeng G H 2015 Acta Opt. Sin. 35 0106006Google Scholar
[50] Lin J, Lütkenhaus N 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 14 064030Google Scholar
[51] Lodewyck J, Bloch M, Garcia-Patron R, Fossier S, Karpov E, Diamanti E, Debuisschert T, Cerf N J, Tualle-Brouri R, McLaughlin S W, Grangier P 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 042305Google Scholar
[52] Wang X Y, Liu J Q, Li X F, Li Y M 2015 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 51 5200206Google Scholar
[53] Wang X Y, Liu W Y, Wang P, Li Y M 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 062330Google Scholar
[54] Du S N, Li Z Y, Liu W Y, Wang X Y, Li Y M 2018 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 35 481Google Scholar
[55] Wang X Y, Guo X B, Jia Y X, Zhang Y, Lu Z G, Liu J Q, Li Y M 2023 J. Lightwave Technol. 41 5518Google Scholar
[56] Qi B, Lougovski P, Pooser R, Grice W, Bobrek M 2015 Phys. Rev. X 5 041009Google Scholar
[57] 刘建强, 王旭阳, 白增亮, 李永民 2016 物理学报 65 100303Google Scholar
Liu J Q, Wang X Y, Bai Z L, Li Y M 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 100303Google Scholar
-
图 1 发送端和接收端的量子态在相空间中的Wigner函数图形 (a) 发送端Alice制备的四个相干态的Wigner函数图形和其俯视图; (b) 接收端Bob接收到的四个平移热态的Wigner函数图形和其俯视图
Figure 1. Wigner pictures of the quantum states of Alice and Bob: (a) The Wigner pictures of four coherent states prepared by Alice and their top view; (b) the Wigner functions of four displaced thermal states received by Bob and their top view.
图 3 基于硬件同步方案的四态离散调制CV-QKD系统光路图. AM, 振幅调制器; PM, 相位调制器; PG, 脉冲发生器; AWG, 任意波形发生器; PD, 光电探测器; PMF, 保偏光纤; PBC, 偏振合束器; PBS, 偏振合束器; DPC, 动态偏振控制器; VOA, 可调光衰减器; THD, 时域差拍探测器; TBHD, 时域平衡零拍探测器; FS, 光纤交换机
Figure 3. Scheme of the four-state discrete modulation CV-QKD system based on the hardware synchronization method. AM, amplitude modulator; PM, phase modulator; PG, pulse generator; AWG, arbitrary waveform generator; PD, photodetector; PMF, polarization maintaining fiber; PBC, polarization beam combiner; PBS, polarization beam splitter; DPC, dynamic polarization controller; VOA, variable optical attenuator; THD, time domain heterodyne detector; TBHD, time domain balanced homodyne detector; FS, fiber switch.
图 4 发送端Alice的各种信号波形 (a) AWG.CH1输出的时钟信号波形; (b) 图(a)的展开波形; (c) AWG.CH2-4输出的一个数据块的调制信号波形; (d) PG1.CH1-2输出的脉冲信号波形
Figure 4. Various waveform at Alice’s side: (a) The waveform of clock signals generated by AWG.CH1; (b) the expanded waveform of panel (a); (c) the waveform of one block modulated signals generated by AWG.CH2-4; (d) the waveform of pulse signals generated by PG1.CH1-2.
图 5 接收端Bob的各种信号波形 (a) PD2输出的恢复时钟信号波形; (b) PG 2.CH1输出的时钟信号波形; (c) THD输出的散粒噪声色温图; (d) THD输出的平移热态的色温图
Figure 5. Various waveform at Bob’s side: (a) The waveform of recovery clock signals generated by PD2; (b) the waveform of clock signals generated by PG2.CH1; (c) the color temperature waveform of the shot noise generated by THD; (d) the color temperature waveform of the displaced thermal states generated by THD.
图 6 各平移热态正交分量的一阶矩和二阶矩的测量值 (a) 平移热态$ \rho _0^{{\text{th}}} $测量值; (b) 平移热态$ \rho _1^{{\text{th}}} $测量值; (c) 平移热态$ \rho _2^{{\text{th}}} $测量值; (d) 平移热态$ \rho _3^{{\text{th}}} $测量值
Figure 6. Measurement results of the first and second moments of quadratures of the displaced thermal states: (a) Measurement results of displaced thermal state $ \rho _0^{{\text{th}}} $; (b) measurement results of displaced thermal state $ \rho _1^{{\text{th}}} $; (c) measurement results of displaced thermal state $ \rho _2^{{\text{th}}} $; (d) measurement results of displaced thermal state $ \rho _{3}^{{\text{th}}} $.
表 1 正交分量一阶矩和二阶矩的相关统计量
Table 1. Statistical quantities of the first and second moments of quadratures.
$ \langle {{{\hat X}_0}} \rangle $ $ \langle {{{\hat X}^2}_0} \rangle $ $ \langle {{{\hat Y}_0}} \rangle $ $ \langle {{{\hat Y}^2}_0} \rangle $ $ \langle {{{\hat X}_1}} \rangle $ $ \langle {{{\hat X}^2}_1} \rangle $ $ \langle {{{\hat Y}_1}} \rangle $ $ \langle {{{\hat Y}^2}_1} \rangle $ 最大值 0.494 1.37 0.017 1.12 0.037 1.11 0.492 1.34 最小值 0.438 1.29 –0.035 1.07 –0.021 1.07 0.421 1.27 均值 0.467 1.32 –0.012 1.09 0.012 1.09 0.470 1.31 方差 2.35×10–4 4.09×10–4 2.37×10–4 8.69×10–5 1.58×10–4 7.22×10–5 2.81×10–4 3.98×10–4 期望值 0.470 1.31 –9.09×10–5 1.08 –2.44×10–4 1.08 0.4710 1.30 $ \langle {{{\hat X}_2}} \rangle $ $ \langle {{{\hat X}^2}_2} \rangle $ $ \langle {{{\hat Y}_2}} \rangle $ $ \langle {{{\hat Y}^2}_2} \rangle $ $ \langle {{{\hat X}_3}} \rangle $ $ \langle {{{\hat X}^2}_3} \rangle $ $ \langle {{{\hat Y}_3}} \rangle $ $ \langle {{{\hat Y}^2}_3} \rangle $ 最大值 –0.444 1.38 0.024 1.11 0.034 1.11 –0.425 1.34 最小值 –0.514 1.28 –0.047 1.07 –0.018 1.08 –0.478 1.26 均值 –0.477 1.33 –0.002 1.09 –0.007 1.10 –0.458 1.30 方差 3.86×10–4 6.51×10–4 4.74×10–4 1.01×10–4 1.07×10–4 9.70×10–5 1.90×10–4 3.90×10–4 期望值 –0.469 1.31 –1.56×10–4 1.08 –3.11×10–4 1.09 –0.472 1.30 -
[1] Xu F, Ma X, Zhang Q, Lo H K, Pan J W 2020 Rev. Mod. Phys. 92 025002Google Scholar
[2] Pirandola S, Andersen U L, Banchi L, Berta M, Bunandar D, Colbeck R, Englund D, Gehring T, Lupo C, Ottaviani, Pereira J L, Razavi M, Shamsul Shaari J, Tomamichel M, Usenko V C, Vallone G, Villoresi P, Wallden P 2020 Adv. Opt. Photonics 12 1012Google Scholar
[3] Fan-Yuan G J, Lu F L, Wang S, Yin Z Q, He D Y, Zhou Z, Teng J, Chen W, Guo G C, Han Z F 2021 Photonics Res. 9 1881Google Scholar
[4] Liu H, Jiang C, Zhu H T, Zou M, Yu Z W, Hu X L, Xu H, Ma S, Han Z, Chen J P, Dai Y, Tang S B, Zhang W, Li H, You L, Wang Z, Hua Y, Hu H, Zhang H, Zhou F, Zhang Q, Wang X B, Chen T Y, Pan J W 2021 Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 250502Google Scholar
[5] Grosshans F, Van Assche G, Wenger J, Brouri R, Cerf N J, Grangier P 2003 Nature 421 238Google Scholar
[6] Xu H, Hu X L, Jiang C, Yu Z W, Wang X B 2023 Phys. Rev. Res. 5 023069Google Scholar
[7] Jiang C, Yu Z W, Hu X L, Wang X B 2023 Natl. Sci. Rev. 10 186Google Scholar
[8] Yin J, Li Y H, Liao S K, Yang M, Cao Y, Zhang Y, Ren J G, Cai W Q, Liu W Y, Li S L, Shu R, Huang Y M, Deng L, Li L, Zhang Q, Liu N L, Chen Y A, Lu C Y, Wang X B, Xu F H, Wang J Y, Peng C Z, Ekert A K, Pan J W 2020 Nature 582 501Google Scholar
[9] Fang X T, Zeng P, Liu H, Zou M, Wu W J, Tang Y L, Sheng Y J, Zhang W, Li L, Li M J, Chen H A, Zhang Q, Peng C Z, Ma X, Chen T Y, Pan J W 2020 Nat. Photonics 14 422Google Scholar
[10] Zhu H T, Huang Y Z, Liu H, Zeng P, Zou M, Dai Y Q, Tang S B, Li H, You L X, Wang Z, Chen Y A, Ma X F, Chen T Y, Pan J W 2023 Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 030801Google Scholar
[11] Du Y Q, Zhu X, Hua X, Zhao Z G, Hu X, Qian Y, Xiao X, Wei K J 2023 Chip 2 100039Google Scholar
[12] Wei K J, Li W, Tan H, Li Y, Min H, Zhang W J, Li H, You L X, Wang Z, Jiang X, Chen T Y, Liao S K, Peng C Z, Xu F H, Pan J W 2020 Phys. Rev. X 10 031030Google Scholar
[13] Huang P, Wang T, Huang D, Zeng G H 2022 Symmetry 14 568Google Scholar
[14] Wang H, Pan Y, Shao Y, Pi Y D, Ye T, Li Y, Zhang T, Liu J L, Yang J, Ma L, Huang W, Xu B J 2023 Opt. Express 31 5577Google Scholar
[15] Sun S H, Xu F H 2021 New J. Phys. 23 023011Google Scholar
[16] Sun S H 2021 Phys. Rev. A 104 022423Google Scholar
[17] Huang P, Huang J Z, Zhang Z S, Zeng G H 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 042311Google Scholar
[18] Zhang Y C, Li Z Y, Yu S, Gu W Y, Peng X, Guo H 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 052325Google Scholar
[19] Qi B, Gunther H, Evans P G, Williams B P, Camacho R M, Peters N A 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 13 054065Google Scholar
[20] Tian Y, Wang P, Liu J Q, Du S N, Liu W Y, Lu Z G, Wang X Y, Li Y M 2022 Optica 9 492Google Scholar
[21] Tian Y, Zhang Y, Liu S S, Wang P, Lu Z G, Wang X Y, Li Y M 2023 Opt. Lett. 48 2953Google Scholar
[22] Wang T, Xu Y, Zhao H, Li L, Huang P, Zeng G H 2023 Opt. Lett. 48 719Google Scholar
[23] Wang P, Zhang Y, Lu Z G, Wang X Y, Li Y M 2023 New J. Phys. 25 023019Google Scholar
[24] Du S N, Wang P, Liu J Q, Tian Y, Li Y M 2023 Photonics Res. 11 463Google Scholar
[25] Chen J P, Zhang C, Liu Y, Jiang C, Zhang W, Han Z Y, Ma S Z, Hu X L, Li Y H, Liu H, Zhou F, Jiang H F, Chen T Y, Li H, You L X, Wang Z, Wang X B, Zhang Q, Pan J W 2021 Nat. Photonics 15 570Google Scholar
[26] Wang S, Yin Z Q, He D Y, Chen W, Wang R Q, Ye P, Zhou Y, Fan-Yuan G J, Wang F X, Chen W, Zhu Y G, Morozov P V, Divochiy A V, Zhou Z, Guo G C, Han F Z 2022 Nat. Photonics 16 154Google Scholar
[27] Liu Y, Zhang W J, Jiang C, Chen J P, Zhang C, Pan W X, Ma D, Dong H, Xiong J M, Zhang C J, Li H, Chen T Y, You L X, Wang X B, Zhang Q, Pan J W 2023 Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 210801Google Scholar
[28] Pan Y, Wang H, Shao Y, Pi Y D, Liu B, Huang W, Xu B J 2022 Opt. Lett. 47 3307Google Scholar
[29] Wang H, Li Y, Pi Y D, Pan Y, Shao Y, Ma L, Zhang Y C, Yang J, Zhang Tao, Huang W, Xu B J 2022 Commun. Phys. 5 162Google Scholar
[30] Hajomer A A E, Bruynsteen C, Derkach I, Jain N, Bomhals A, Bastiaens S, Andersen U L, Yin X, Gehring T 2023 arXiv: 2305.19642v1[quant-ph]
[31] Zhang Y C, Chen Z Y, Pirandola S, Wang X Y, Zhou C, Chu B J, Zhao Y J, Xu B J, Yu S, Guo H 2020 Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 010502Google Scholar
[32] Zhang G, Haw J Y, Cai H, Xu F H, Assad S M, Fitzsimons J F, Zhou X, Zhang Y, Yu S, Wu J, Ser W, Kwek L C, Liu A Q 2019 Nat. Photonics 13 839Google Scholar
[33] Wang X Y, Jia Y X, Guo X B, Liu J Q, Wang S F, Liu W Y, Sun F Y, Zou J, Li Y M 2022 Chin. Opt. Lett. 20 041301Google Scholar
[34] Jia Y X, Wang X Y, Hu X, Hua X, Zhang Y, Guo X B, Zhang S X, Xiao X, Yu S H, Zou J, Li Y M 2023 New J. Phys. 25 103030Google Scholar
[35] Li L, Wang T, Li X H, Huang P, Guo Y Y, Lu L J, Zhou L J, Zeng G H 2023 Photonics Res. 11 504Google Scholar
[36] Leverrier A, Grangier P 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 180504Google Scholar
[37] Leverrier A, Grosshans F, Grangier P 2010 Phys. Rev. A 81 062343Google Scholar
[38] Lin J, Upadhyaya T, Lutkenhaus N 2019 Phys. Rev. X 9 041064Google Scholar
[39] Ghorai S, Grangier P, Diamanti E, Leverrier A 2019 Phys. Rev. X 9 021059Google Scholar
[40] Lupo C, Ouyang Y K 2022 PRX Quantum 3 010341Google Scholar
[41] Ma H X, Huang P, Bai D Y, Wang T, Wang S Y, Bao W S, Zeng G H 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 022322Google Scholar
[42] Liu W B, Li C L, Xie Y M, Weng C X, Gu J, Cao X Y, Lu Y S, Li B H, Yin H L, Chen Z B 2021 PRX Quantum 2 040334Google Scholar
[43] Wang X Y, Bai Z L, Wang S F, Li Y M, Peng K C 2013 Chin. Phys. Lett. 30 010305Google Scholar
[44] Pereira D, Almeida M, Facao M F, Pinto A N, Silva N A 2022 Opt. Lett. 47 3948Google Scholar
[45] Kleis S, Rueckmann M, Schaeffe C G 2017 Opt. Lett. 42 1588Google Scholar
[46] Milovancev D, Vokic N, Laudenbach F, Pacher C, Hübel H, Schrenk B 2021 J. Lightwave Technol. 39 3445Google Scholar
[47] Li H S, Wang C, Huang P, Huang D, Wang T, Zeng G H 2016 Opt. Express 24 20481Google Scholar
[48] Wang C, Huang P, Huang D, Lin D K, Zeng G H 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 022315Google Scholar
[49] 刘友明, 汪超, 黄端, 黄鹏, 冯晓毅, 彭进业, 曹正文, 曾贵华 2015 光学学报 35 0106006Google Scholar
Liu Y M, Wang C, Huang D, Huang P, Feng X Y, Peng J Y, Cao Z W, Zeng G H 2015 Acta Opt. Sin. 35 0106006Google Scholar
[50] Lin J, Lütkenhaus N 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl. 14 064030Google Scholar
[51] Lodewyck J, Bloch M, Garcia-Patron R, Fossier S, Karpov E, Diamanti E, Debuisschert T, Cerf N J, Tualle-Brouri R, McLaughlin S W, Grangier P 2007 Phys. Rev. A 76 042305Google Scholar
[52] Wang X Y, Liu J Q, Li X F, Li Y M 2015 IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 51 5200206Google Scholar
[53] Wang X Y, Liu W Y, Wang P, Li Y M 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 062330Google Scholar
[54] Du S N, Li Z Y, Liu W Y, Wang X Y, Li Y M 2018 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 35 481Google Scholar
[55] Wang X Y, Guo X B, Jia Y X, Zhang Y, Lu Z G, Liu J Q, Li Y M 2023 J. Lightwave Technol. 41 5518Google Scholar
[56] Qi B, Lougovski P, Pooser R, Grice W, Bobrek M 2015 Phys. Rev. X 5 041009Google Scholar
[57] 刘建强, 王旭阳, 白增亮, 李永民 2016 物理学报 65 100303Google Scholar
Liu J Q, Wang X Y, Bai Z L, Li Y M 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 100303Google Scholar
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 2405
- PDF Downloads: 87
- Cited By: 0