Orbital angular momentum splitter of light based on beam displacer

Zhang Zhuo; Zhang Jing-Feng; Kong Ling-Jun

doi:10.7498/aps.73.20231874

Abstract

In recent years, the high-dimensional properties of the orbital angular momentum degree of freedom of light have attracted extensive attention. This degree of freedom has been studied and used in many scientific fields, especially in optical communication and quantum information. In order to fully utilize the high-dimensional properties of orbital angular momentum, non-destructive separation of different orbital angular momentum states has become a fundamental requirement. However, the existing orbital angular momentum beam-splitting systems either lack stability and cascade expansibility, or the properties of the separated orbital angular momentum states are seriously damaged, thus failing to participate in further interaction processes. In this work, we construct a miniature Mach-Zehnder interferometer based on the beam displacer, and design an orbital angular momentum beam splitter, thereby realizing the non-destructive beam splitting of orbital angular momentum mode. In the orbital angular momentum splitter, the theoretical energy loss is zero because there exists only total reflection of the beam. The beam in the miniature Mach-Zehnder interferometer passes through the same optical element, and the spatial deviation of the beam is small, so the orbital angular momentum beam splitter has good stability. In addition, because the separated orbital angular momentum state has the same propagation direction as the incident orbital angular momentum state, the beam splitter has good extensibility and is easy to use in cascade. Our research result is of great significance in using the orbital angular momentum as a high-dimensional degree of freedom in optical communication and other related fields.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

Beijing Key Laboratory of Nanophotonics and Ultrafine Optoelectronic Systems, Key Laboratory of Advanced Optoelectronic Quantum Architecture and Measurements of Ministry of Education, School of Physics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

Corresponding author: Kong Ling-Jun, konglj@bit.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12004038).

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Coullet P, Gil L, Rocca F 1989 Opt. Commun. 73 403 Google Scholar
[2]	Allen L, Beijersbergen M W, Spreeuw R J C, Woerdman J P 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45 8185 Google Scholar
[3]	Li S M, Kong L J, Ren Z C, Li Y, Tu C, Wang H T 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 035801 Google Scholar
[4]	Neshev D N, Alexander T J, Ostrovskaya E A, Kivshar Y S, Martin H, Makasyuk I, Chen Z 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 123903 Google Scholar
[5]	Swartzlander G A, Law C T 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 2503 Google Scholar
[6]	Tikhonenko V, Christou J, Luther-Daves B 1995 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 12 2046 Google Scholar
[7]	Firth W J, Skryabin D V 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 2450 Google Scholar
[8]	Dholakia K, Simpson N B, Padgett M J, Allen L 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 R3742 Google Scholar
[9]	Courtial J, Dholakia K, Allen L, Padgett M J 1997 Phys. Rev. A 56 4193 Google Scholar
[10]	Andersen M F, Ryu C, Cladé P, Natarajan V, Vaziri A, Helmerson K, Phillips W D 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 170406 Google Scholar
[11]	Grier D G 2003 Nature 424 810 Google Scholar
[12]	Paterson L, MacDonald M P, Arlt J, Sibbett W, Bryant P E, Dholakia K 2001 Science 292 912 Google Scholar
[13]	Kong L J, Qian S X, Ren Z C, Wang X L, Wang H T 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 035804 Google Scholar
[14]	Dennis M R, King R P, Jack B, O’Holleran K, Padgett M J 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 118 Google Scholar
[15]	Larocque H, Sugic D, Mortimer D, Taylor A J, Fickler R, Boyd R W, Dennis M R, Karimi E 2018 Nat. Phys. 14 1079 Google Scholar
[16]	Wang L, Zhang W X, Yin H X, Zhang X D 2019 Adv. Opt. Mater. 7 1900263 Google Scholar
[17]	Kong L J, Zhang W, Li P, Guo X, Zhang J, Zhang F, Zhao J, Zhang X 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 2705 Google Scholar
[18]	Fürhapter S, Jesacher A, Bernet S, Ritsch-Marte M 2005 Opt. Express 13 689 Google Scholar
[19]	Kozawa Y, Matsunaga D, Sato S 2018 Optica 5 86 Google Scholar
[20]	Fang X, Ren H, Gu M 2020 Nat. Photonics 14 102 Google Scholar
[21]	Kong L J, Sun Y, Zhang F, Zhang J, Zhang X 2023 Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 053602 Google Scholar
[22]	Zhuang X 2004 Science 305 188 Google Scholar
[23]	Berkhout G C G, Beijersbergen M W 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 100801 Google Scholar
[24]	Ke Z J, Wang Y T, Yu S, Liu W, Meng Y, Li Z P, Wang H, Li Q, Xu J S, Xiao Y, Tang J S, Li C F, Guo G C 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 080301 Google Scholar
[25]	Friese M E J, Nieminen T A, Heckenberg N R, Rubinsztein-Dunlop H 1998 Nature 394 348 Google Scholar
[26]	Friese M E J, Enger J, Rubinsztein-Dunlop H, Heckenberg N R 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 1593 Google Scholar
[27]	Simpson N B, Dholakia K, Allen L, Padgett M J 1997 Opt. Lett. 22 52 Google Scholar
[28]	Bialynicki-Birula I, Bialynicka-Birula Z 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 2539 Google Scholar
[29]	Courtial J, Dholakia K, Robertson D A, Allen L, Padgett M J 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 3217 Google Scholar
[30]	Courtial J, Robertson D A, Dholakia K, Allen L, Padgett M J 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 4828 Google Scholar
[31]	Lavery M P J, Speirits F C, Barnett S M, Padgett M J 2013 Science 341 537 Google Scholar
[32]	Wang J, Yang J Y, Fazal I M, Ahmed N, Yan Y, Huang H, Ren Y, Yue Y, Dolinar S, Tur M, Willner A E 2012 Nat. Photonics 6 488 Google Scholar
[33]	Huang H, Xie G, Yan Y, Ahmed N, Ren Y, Yue Y, Rogawski D, Willner M J, Erkmen B I, Birnbaum K M, Dolinar S J, Lavery M P J, Padgett M J, Tur M, Willner A E 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 197 Google Scholar
[34]	Krenn M, Handsteiner J, Fink M, Fickler R, Ursin R, Malik M, Zeilinger A 2016 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113 13648 Google Scholar
[35]	Watkins R J, Dai K, White G, Li W, Miller J K, Morgan K S, Johnson E G 2020 Opt. Express 28 924 Google Scholar
[36]	Bozinovic N, Yue Y, Ren Y, Tur M, Kristensen P, Huang H, Willner A E, Ramachandran S 2013 Science 340 1545 Google Scholar
[37]	Mair A, Vaziri A, Weihs G, Zeilinger A 2001 Nature 412 313 Google Scholar
[38]	Kong L J, Li Y, Liu R, Qi W R, Wang Q, Wang Z X, Huang S Y, Si Y, Tu C, Hu W, Xu F, Lu Y Q, Wang H T 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 023822 Google Scholar
[39]	Kong L J, Liu R, Qi W R, Wang Z X, Huang S Y, Wang Q, Tu C, Li Y, Wang H T 2019 Sci. Adv. 5 eaat9206 Google Scholar
[40]	Romero J, Giovannini D, Franke-Arnold S, Barnett S M, Padgett M J 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 012334 Google Scholar
[41]	Vaziri A, Weihs G, Zeilinger A 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 240401 Google Scholar
[42]	Kong L J, Liu R, Qi W R, Wang Z X, Huang S Y, Tu C, Li Y, Wang H T 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 034204 Google Scholar
[43]	Zhang Y, Agnew M, Roger T, Roux F S, Konrad T, Faccio D, Leach J, Forbes A 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 632 Google Scholar
[44]	Dada A C, Leach J, Buller G S, Padgett M J, Andersson E 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 677 Google Scholar
[45]	Berkhout G C G, Lavery M P J, Courtial J, Beijersbergen M W, Padgett M J 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 153601 Google Scholar
[46]	Wan C, Chen J, Zhan Q 2017 APL Photonics 2 031302 Google Scholar
[47]	Wen Y, Chremmos I, Chen Y, Zhu J, Zhang Y, Yu S 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 193904 Google Scholar
[48]	Malik M, Erhard M, Huber M, Krenn M, Fickler R, Zeilinger A 2016 Nat. Photonics 10 248 Google Scholar
[49]	Wang F, Erhard M, Babazadeh A, Malik M, Krenn M, Zeilinger A 2017 Optica 4 1462 Google Scholar
[50]	Babazadeh A, Erhard M, Wang F, Malik M, Nouroozi R, Krenn M, Zeilinger A 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 180510 Google Scholar
[51]	Wang X L, Luo Y H, Huang H L, Chen M C, Su Z E, Liu C, Chen C, Li W, Fang Y Q, Jiang X, Zhang J, Li L, Liu N L, Lu C Y, Pan J W 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 260502 Google Scholar
[52]	Cao H, Gao S C, Zhang C, Wang J, He D Y, Liu B H, Zhou Z W, Chen Y J, Li Z H, Yu S Y, Romero J, Huang Y F, Li C F, Guo G C 2020 Optica 7 232 Google Scholar
[53]	Leach J, Padgett M J, Barnett S M, Franke-Arnold S, Courtial J 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 257901 Google Scholar
[54]	Wang F X, Chen W, Yin Z Q, Wang S, Guo G C, Han Z F 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 033847 Google Scholar
[55]	Zhang W, Qi Q, Zhou J, Chen L 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 153601 Google Scholar
[56]	Xue P, Zhang R, Bian Z, Zhan X, Qin H, Sanders B C 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 042316 Google Scholar
[57]	Guo P, Wang S 2022 Photonics 10 1 Google Scholar
[58]	Narushima T, Okamoto H 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 35731 Google Scholar
[59]	Li P, Guo X, Qi S, Han L, Zhang Y, Liu S, Li Y, Zhao J 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 9831 Google Scholar
[60]	Chi Y, Yu Y, Gong Q, Wang J 2023 Sci. China Inf. Sci. 66 180501 Google Scholar
[61]	Lei T, Zhang M, Li Y R, Jia P, Liu G N, Xu X G, Li Z H, Min C J, Lin J, Yu C Y, Niu H B, Yuan X C 2015 Light Sci. Appl. 4 e257 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 D-PP对图像的旋转作用　(a)水平放置的PP对图像(绿色字母R)两次反射的情况. 这里, 光束垂直入射到PP的前表面; (b) PP的旋转对图像旋转的影响. 这里, 光束垂直入射到PP的前表面, PP的旋转轴平行于入射光束传播的方向; (c) 以平行于入射光束传播方向为旋转轴, PP相对于水平放置的旋转角度$\alpha $和经过两次反射之后的图像的旋转角度$\beta $之间的关系, 黑色实线为理论结果, 黄色填充的红圈为实验结果; (d) D-PP的构成, 由两个PP构成. 其中一个PP相对于水平放置旋转角度为$\alpha $; 另一个PP相对于水平放置旋转角度为$ - \alpha $

Figure 1. Rotation effect of D-PP on image: (a) Situation where the image (green letter R) experience two reflections in PP placed horizontally, here, the light field is vertically incident on the front surface of PP; (b) the impact of PP rotation on image rotation, here, the light field is vertically incident on the front surface of PP, and the rotation axis of PP is parallel to the direction of propagation of the incident light field; (c) the relationship between the rotation angle α of the PP and the rotation angle $\beta $of the image after two reflections, the rotation axis is parallel to the propagation direction of the incident light field, the solid black line represents the theoretical results, and the red circles filled in yellow represent the experimental results; (d) composition of D-PP, a D-PP can be seen as a combination of two PPs, the rotation angle of one PP is α, and the rotation angle of another PP is $ - \alpha $.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 基于BD设计的OAM分束器以及不同参数设置下的分束情况　(a) OAM分束器的构成和光路图, 其中, WP1, WP2, WP3表示偏振补偿波片, RP代表直角棱镜, a, a1, a2, b, b1, b2, c, c1, c2, o1, o2表示光束在分束器中所走的路径, 右上角为装置的整体效果图, 左下角为装置的实物图; (b)不同参数情况下的分束情况, $\alpha $为PP旋转的角度, $\delta $为WP1引入的两束正交偏振光之间的相对相位差, $l$为OAM拓扑荷数, ${P_{o1}}$和${P_{o2}}$为输出端口$o1$和$o2$的输出功率

Figure 2. OAM beam splitter based on BD and beam splitting under different parameter conditions: (a) Composition of the OAM beam splitter and optical path diagram in it. Here, WP1, WP2, and WP3 represent polarization compensation waveplates; RP represents a right-angle prism. a, a1, a2, b, b1, b2, c, c1, c2, o1, o2 indicate the path of the beam in the beam splitter, the upper right corner shows the overall rendering of the device, the lower left corner shows the physical image of the device; (b) beam splitting under different parameter conditions, $\alpha $ is the rotation angle of PP, $\delta $ is the relative phase difference between the two orthogonal polarized beams introduced by WP1, $l$ is the topological charge of OAM, ${P_{o1}}$ and ${P_{o2}}$ are the output powers of the output ports $o1$ and $o2$.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 不同参数下不同拓扑荷数OAM态分束的实验结果　(a)参数设置为$ (\alpha,\; \delta) $ = (π/4, 0)时, OAM态$\left| 1 \right\rangle $和$\left| 2 \right\rangle $分束的结果; (b)参数设置为$ (\alpha,\; \delta) $ = (π/8, π/2)时, OAM态$\left| 1 \right\rangle $和$\left| 3 \right\rangle $分束的结果, 图中的百分数表示对某种入射OAM态, 不同端口的输出功率相对于所有端口输出的总功率的比值

Figure 3. Experimental results of beam splitting of OAM states with different topological charges in OAM sorter with different parameters: (a) Results of beam splitting of OAM states $\left| 1 \right\rangle $and $\left| 2 \right\rangle $when the parameters are set as $ (\alpha,\; \delta) $ = (π/4, 0); (b) results of beam splitting of OAM states $\left| 1 \right\rangle $and $\left| 3 \right\rangle $when the parameters are set as $ (\alpha,\; \delta) $ = (π/8, π/2), each percentage represents the ratio of each output power to the total output power of all ports for a certain incident OAM state.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 级联情况下的分束情况　(a)级联OAM分束器. 针对要分开的OAM态为$\left| 1 \right\rangle $, $\left| 2 \right\rangle $, $\left| 7 \right\rangle $和$\left| 8 \right\rangle $, 第1级的OAM分束器参数设为$ (\alpha,\; \delta) $ = (π/4, π), 第2级的两个OAM分束器分别设置为$ (\alpha,\; \delta) $ = (π/8, 3π/2)和$ (\alpha,\; \delta) $ = (π/8, π), 级联后, 有o1o1, o1o2, o2o1和o2o2四个输出端口; (b)级联OAM分束器对OAM态$\left| 1 \right\rangle $, $\left| 2 \right\rangle $, $\left| 7 \right\rangle $和$\left| 8 \right\rangle $分束的实验结果, 图中的百分数表示对某种入射OAM态, 不同端口的输出功率相对于所有端口输出的总功率的比值

Figure 4. Beam splitting in the cascading case: (a) Cascaded OAM beam splitters. Due to that the OAM states to be separated are $\left| 1 \right\rangle $, $\left| 2 \right\rangle $, $\left| 7 \right\rangle $ and $\left| 8 \right\rangle $, the parameters of the first stage OAM splitter are set as $ (\alpha,\; \delta) $ = (π/4, π), and the two OAM splitters of the second stage are set as $ (\alpha,\; \delta) $ = (π/8, 3π/2) and $ (\alpha,\; \delta) $ = (π/8, π), respectively, after cascading, there are four output ports, o1o1, o1o2, o2o1, and o2o2; (b) experimental results of cascading OAM beam splitters for OAM states $\left| 1 \right\rangle $, $\left| 2 \right\rangle $, $\left| 7 \right\rangle $ and $\left| 8 \right\rangle $, each percentage represents the ratio of each output power to the total output power of all ports for a certain incident OAM state.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

[1]	Coullet P, Gil L, Rocca F 1989 Opt. Commun. 73 403 Google Scholar
[2]	Allen L, Beijersbergen M W, Spreeuw R J C, Woerdman J P 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45 8185 Google Scholar
[3]	Li S M, Kong L J, Ren Z C, Li Y, Tu C, Wang H T 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 035801 Google Scholar
[4]	Neshev D N, Alexander T J, Ostrovskaya E A, Kivshar Y S, Martin H, Makasyuk I, Chen Z 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 123903 Google Scholar
[5]	Swartzlander G A, Law C T 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 2503 Google Scholar
[6]	Tikhonenko V, Christou J, Luther-Daves B 1995 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 12 2046 Google Scholar
[7]	Firth W J, Skryabin D V 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 2450 Google Scholar
[8]	Dholakia K, Simpson N B, Padgett M J, Allen L 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 R3742 Google Scholar
[9]	Courtial J, Dholakia K, Allen L, Padgett M J 1997 Phys. Rev. A 56 4193 Google Scholar
[10]	Andersen M F, Ryu C, Cladé P, Natarajan V, Vaziri A, Helmerson K, Phillips W D 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 170406 Google Scholar
[11]	Grier D G 2003 Nature 424 810 Google Scholar
[12]	Paterson L, MacDonald M P, Arlt J, Sibbett W, Bryant P E, Dholakia K 2001 Science 292 912 Google Scholar
[13]	Kong L J, Qian S X, Ren Z C, Wang X L, Wang H T 2012 Phys. Rev. A 85 035804 Google Scholar
[14]	Dennis M R, King R P, Jack B, O’Holleran K, Padgett M J 2010 Nat. Phys. 6 118 Google Scholar
[15]	Larocque H, Sugic D, Mortimer D, Taylor A J, Fickler R, Boyd R W, Dennis M R, Karimi E 2018 Nat. Phys. 14 1079 Google Scholar
[16]	Wang L, Zhang W X, Yin H X, Zhang X D 2019 Adv. Opt. Mater. 7 1900263 Google Scholar
[17]	Kong L J, Zhang W, Li P, Guo X, Zhang J, Zhang F, Zhao J, Zhang X 2022 Nat. Commun. 13 2705 Google Scholar
[18]	Fürhapter S, Jesacher A, Bernet S, Ritsch-Marte M 2005 Opt. Express 13 689 Google Scholar
[19]	Kozawa Y, Matsunaga D, Sato S 2018 Optica 5 86 Google Scholar
[20]	Fang X, Ren H, Gu M 2020 Nat. Photonics 14 102 Google Scholar
[21]	Kong L J, Sun Y, Zhang F, Zhang J, Zhang X 2023 Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 053602 Google Scholar
[22]	Zhuang X 2004 Science 305 188 Google Scholar
[23]	Berkhout G C G, Beijersbergen M W 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 100801 Google Scholar
[24]	Ke Z J, Wang Y T, Yu S, Liu W, Meng Y, Li Z P, Wang H, Li Q, Xu J S, Xiao Y, Tang J S, Li C F, Guo G C 2020 Chin. Phys. B 29 080301 Google Scholar
[25]	Friese M E J, Nieminen T A, Heckenberg N R, Rubinsztein-Dunlop H 1998 Nature 394 348 Google Scholar
[26]	Friese M E J, Enger J, Rubinsztein-Dunlop H, Heckenberg N R 1996 Phys. Rev. A 54 1593 Google Scholar
[27]	Simpson N B, Dholakia K, Allen L, Padgett M J 1997 Opt. Lett. 22 52 Google Scholar
[28]	Bialynicki-Birula I, Bialynicka-Birula Z 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 2539 Google Scholar
[29]	Courtial J, Dholakia K, Robertson D A, Allen L, Padgett M J 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 3217 Google Scholar
[30]	Courtial J, Robertson D A, Dholakia K, Allen L, Padgett M J 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 4828 Google Scholar
[31]	Lavery M P J, Speirits F C, Barnett S M, Padgett M J 2013 Science 341 537 Google Scholar
[32]	Wang J, Yang J Y, Fazal I M, Ahmed N, Yan Y, Huang H, Ren Y, Yue Y, Dolinar S, Tur M, Willner A E 2012 Nat. Photonics 6 488 Google Scholar
[33]	Huang H, Xie G, Yan Y, Ahmed N, Ren Y, Yue Y, Rogawski D, Willner M J, Erkmen B I, Birnbaum K M, Dolinar S J, Lavery M P J, Padgett M J, Tur M, Willner A E 2014 Opt. Lett. 39 197 Google Scholar
[34]	Krenn M, Handsteiner J, Fink M, Fickler R, Ursin R, Malik M, Zeilinger A 2016 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113 13648 Google Scholar
[35]	Watkins R J, Dai K, White G, Li W, Miller J K, Morgan K S, Johnson E G 2020 Opt. Express 28 924 Google Scholar
[36]	Bozinovic N, Yue Y, Ren Y, Tur M, Kristensen P, Huang H, Willner A E, Ramachandran S 2013 Science 340 1545 Google Scholar
[37]	Mair A, Vaziri A, Weihs G, Zeilinger A 2001 Nature 412 313 Google Scholar
[38]	Kong L J, Li Y, Liu R, Qi W R, Wang Q, Wang Z X, Huang S Y, Si Y, Tu C, Hu W, Xu F, Lu Y Q, Wang H T 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 023822 Google Scholar
[39]	Kong L J, Liu R, Qi W R, Wang Z X, Huang S Y, Wang Q, Tu C, Li Y, Wang H T 2019 Sci. Adv. 5 eaat9206 Google Scholar
[40]	Romero J, Giovannini D, Franke-Arnold S, Barnett S M, Padgett M J 2012 Phys. Rev. A 86 012334 Google Scholar
[41]	Vaziri A, Weihs G, Zeilinger A 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 240401 Google Scholar
[42]	Kong L J, Liu R, Qi W R, Wang Z X, Huang S Y, Tu C, Li Y, Wang H T 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 034204 Google Scholar
[43]	Zhang Y, Agnew M, Roger T, Roux F S, Konrad T, Faccio D, Leach J, Forbes A 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 632 Google Scholar
[44]	Dada A C, Leach J, Buller G S, Padgett M J, Andersson E 2011 Nat. Phys. 7 677 Google Scholar
[45]	Berkhout G C G, Lavery M P J, Courtial J, Beijersbergen M W, Padgett M J 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 153601 Google Scholar
[46]	Wan C, Chen J, Zhan Q 2017 APL Photonics 2 031302 Google Scholar
[47]	Wen Y, Chremmos I, Chen Y, Zhu J, Zhang Y, Yu S 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 193904 Google Scholar
[48]	Malik M, Erhard M, Huber M, Krenn M, Fickler R, Zeilinger A 2016 Nat. Photonics 10 248 Google Scholar
[49]	Wang F, Erhard M, Babazadeh A, Malik M, Krenn M, Zeilinger A 2017 Optica 4 1462 Google Scholar
[50]	Babazadeh A, Erhard M, Wang F, Malik M, Nouroozi R, Krenn M, Zeilinger A 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 180510 Google Scholar
[51]	Wang X L, Luo Y H, Huang H L, Chen M C, Su Z E, Liu C, Chen C, Li W, Fang Y Q, Jiang X, Zhang J, Li L, Liu N L, Lu C Y, Pan J W 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 260502 Google Scholar
[52]	Cao H, Gao S C, Zhang C, Wang J, He D Y, Liu B H, Zhou Z W, Chen Y J, Li Z H, Yu S Y, Romero J, Huang Y F, Li C F, Guo G C 2020 Optica 7 232 Google Scholar
[53]	Leach J, Padgett M J, Barnett S M, Franke-Arnold S, Courtial J 2002 Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 257901 Google Scholar
[54]	Wang F X, Chen W, Yin Z Q, Wang S, Guo G C, Han Z F 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 033847 Google Scholar
[55]	Zhang W, Qi Q, Zhou J, Chen L 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 153601 Google Scholar
[56]	Xue P, Zhang R, Bian Z, Zhan X, Qin H, Sanders B C 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 042316 Google Scholar
[57]	Guo P, Wang S 2022 Photonics 10 1 Google Scholar
[58]	Narushima T, Okamoto H 2016 Sci. Rep. 6 35731 Google Scholar
[59]	Li P, Guo X, Qi S, Han L, Zhang Y, Liu S, Li Y, Zhao J 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 9831 Google Scholar
[60]	Chi Y, Yu Y, Gong Q, Wang J 2023 Sci. China Inf. Sci. 66 180501 Google Scholar
[61]	Lei T, Zhang M, Li Y R, Jia P, Liu G N, Xu X G, Li Z H, Min C J, Lin J, Yu C Y, Niu H B, Yuan X C 2015 Light Sci. Appl. 4 e257 Google Scholar

[1]	Chen Bo, Liu Jin, Li Jun-Tao, Wang Xue-Hua. Research progress of integrated quantum light sources with orbital angular momentum. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(16): 164204. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240791
[2]	Xu Meng-Min, Li Xiao-Qing, Tang Rong, Ji Xiao-Ling. Influence of wind-dominated thermal blooming on orbital angular momentum and phase singularity of dual-mode vortex beams. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(16): 164202. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230684
[3]	Wu Hang, Chen Liao, Shu Xue-Wen, Zhang Xin-Liang. Generation of all-fiber third-order orbital angular momentum modes based on femtosecond laser processing of long-period grating. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(4): 044201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221928
[4]	Zhao Li-Juan, Jiang Huan-Qiu, Xu Zhi-Niu. Helically twisted double-cladding-three-core photonic crystal fiber for generation of orbital angular momentum. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(13): 134201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222405
[5]	Liu Rui-Xi, Ma Lei. Effects of ocean turbulence on photon orbital angular momentum quantum communication. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(1): 010304. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211146
[6]	Gao Xi, Tang Li-Guang. Wideband and high efficiency orbital angular momentum generator based on bi-layer metasurface. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(3): 038101. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20200975
[7]	Jiang Ji-Heng, Yu Shi-Xing, Kou Na, Ding Zhao, Zhang Zheng-Ping. Beam steering of orbital angular momentum vortex wave based on planar phased array. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(23): 238401. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211119
[8]	Cui Can, Wang Zhi, Li Qiang, Wu Chong-Qing, Wang Jian. Modulation of orbital angular momentum in long periodchirally-coupled-cores fiber. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(6): 064211. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182036
[9]	Fu Shi-Yao, Gao Chun-Qing. Progress of detecting orbital angular momentum states of optical vortices through diffraction gratings. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(3): 034201. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20171899
[10]	Fan Rong-Hua, Guo Bang-Hong, Guo Jian-Jun, Zhang Cheng-Xian, Zhang Wen-Jie, Du Ge. Entangled W state of multi degree of freedom system based on orbital angular momentum. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(14): 140301. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.140301
[11]	Ke Xi-Zheng, Chen Juan, Yang Yi-Ming. Study on orbital angular momentum of Laguerre-Gaussian beam in a slant-path atmospheric turbulence. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(15): 150301. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.150301
[12]	Qi Xiao-Qing, Gao Chun-Qing, Xin Jing-Tao, Zhang Ge. Experimental study of 8-bits information transmission system based on orbital angular momentum of light beams. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(17): 174204. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.174204
[13]	Li Tie, Chen Juan, Ke Xi-Zheng. Study of orbital angular momentum entangled photons entanglement in atmospheric channel. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(12): 124208. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.124208
[14]	Qi Xiao-Qing, Gao Chun-Qing. Experimental study of detecting orbital angular momentumstates of spiral phase beams. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(1): 014208. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.014208
[15]	Ke Xi-Zheng, Nu Ning, Yang Qin-Ling. Research of transmission characteristics of single-photon orbital angular momentum. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(9): 6159-6163. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.6159
[16]	Lü Hong, Ke Xi-Zheng. Scattering of a beam with orbital angular momentum by a single sphere. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(12): 8302-8308. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.8302
[17]	Su Zhi-Kun, Wang Fa-Qiang, Lu Yi-Qun, Jin Rui-Bo, Liang Rui-Sheng, Liu Song-Hao. Study on quantum cryptography using orbital angular momentum states of photons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(5): 3016-3021. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.3016
[18]	Gao Ming-Wei, Gao Chun-Qing, Lin Zhi-Feng. Generation of twisted stigmatic beam and transfer of orbital angular momentum during the beam transformation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(4): 2184-2190. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.2184
[19]	Dong Yi-Ming, Xu Yun-Fei, Zhang Zhang, Lin Qiang. The experimental investigation of orbital angular momentum of complex astigmatic elliptical beams. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(11): 5755-5759. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.5755
[20]	Gao Ming-Wei, Gao Chun-Qing, He Xiao-Yan, Li Jia-Ze, Wei Guang-Hui. Rotation of particles by using the beamwith orbital angular momentum. Acta Physica Sinica, 2004, 53(2): 413-417. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.413

Catalog

Vol. 73, Issue 7 - 2024-04-05

Metrics

Abstract views: 1802
PDF Downloads: 92
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板