Research progress of ultracold ion source

Zhou Wen-Chang; Fang Feng; Luo Chang-Jie; Mou Hong-Jin; Lu Liang; Zou Li-Ping; Cheng Rui; Yang Jie; Du Guang-Hua

doi:10.7498/aps.73.20240695

Abstract

Nanobeam is an advanced technology for preparing charged ion beams with spot diameters on a nanometer scale, and mainly used for high-resolution and high-precision ion beam analysis, ion beam fabrication and ion beam material modification research. The nanobeam devices play an important role in realizing material analysis, micro/nano fabrication, microelectronic device manufacturing and quantum computing. The high-quality ion source is one of the key components of nanobeam device, the performance of which directly affects the resolution and precision of the nanobeam system. However, the traditional ion source used in this system is limited to available ionic species, large energy spread and complex structure. These issues hinder their ability to meet emerging application scenarios that require multi-ion types and high resolution. This emphasizes the importance of creating newion sources as soon as possible.With the development of laser cooling technology, ultracold ions with temperatures in the range of mK or even μK can be obtained based on photoionization of cold atoms and laser cooling of ions. The typical characteristics of low temperature and easy operation greatly promote the emergence of ultracold ion sources. The ultracold ions exhibit extremely small transverse velocity divergence, which can significantly enhance the brightness and emittance quality parameters of the ion source, bringing great opportunities for innovating nano-ion beam technology. Therefore, the research on ultracold ion sources is of great significance for achieving high-quality ion sources with higher brightness, smaller size, lower energy dispersion, more diverse ion species, and simplified structure. Here, we introduce the important achievements in basic research and application technology development of magneto-optical trap ion sources, cold atomic beam ion sources, and ultracold single ion sources from the aspects of preparation principles, generation methods, and typical applications, and review the recent research progress of ultracold ion sources. Finally, we provide an outlook on the future development and application prospects of ultracold ion sources.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

1.
Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
2.
Sino-French Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China
3.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
4.
Advanced Energy Science and Technology Guangdong Laboratory, Huizhou 516003, China
5.
CAS Key Laboratory of High Precision Nuclear Spectroscopy, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China

Corresponding author: Yang Jie, jie.yang@impcas.ac.cn ; Du Guang-Hua, gh_du@impcas.ac.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11975283), the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFA1602500), and the Funds for International Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12120101005).

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Hoeflich K, Hobler G, Allen F I, Wirtz T, Rius G, McElwee-White L, Krasheninnikov A V, Schmidt M, Utke I, Klingner N, Osenberg M, Cordoba R, Djurabekova F, Manke I, Moll P, Manoccio M, De Teresa J M, Bischoff L, Michler J, De Castro O, Delobbe A, Dunne P, Dobrovolskiy O V, Frese N, Goelzhaeuser A, Mazarov P, Koelle D, Moeller W, Perez-Murano F, Philipp P, Vollnhals F, Hlawacek G 2023 Appl. Phys. Rev. 10 041311 Google Scholar
[2]	Manoccio M, Esposito M, Passaseo A, Cuscuna M, Tasco V 2021 Micromachines 12 6 Google Scholar
[3]	Sloyan K, Melkonyan H, Apostoleris H, Dahlem M S, Chiesa M, Al Ghaferi A 2021 Nanotechnology 32 472004 Google Scholar
[4]	Li P, Chen S Y, Dai H F, Yang Z M, Chen Z Q, Wang Y S, Chen Y Q, Peng W Q, Shan W B, Duan H G 2021 Nanoscale 13 1529 Google Scholar
[5]	Lesik M, Spinicelli P, Pezzagna S, Happel P, Jacques V, Salord O, Rasser B, Delobbe A, Sudraud P, Tallaire A, Meijer J, Roch J-F 2013 Physica Status Solidi a-Applications and Materials Science 210 2055 Google Scholar
[6]	Bradac C, Gao W, Forneris J, Trusheim M E, Aharonovich I 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 5625 Google Scholar
[7]	Haruyama M, Onoda S, Higuchi T, Kada W, Chiba A, Hirano Y, Teraji T, Igarashi R, Kawai S, Kawarada H, Ishii Y, Fukuda R, Tanii T, Isoya J, Ohshima T, Hanaizumi O 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 2664 Google Scholar
[8]	Swanson L W, Schwind G A 1978 J. Appl. Phys. 49 5655 Google Scholar
[9]	Bischoff L, Mazarov P, Bruchhaus L, Gierak J 2016 Appl. Phys. Rev. 3 021101 Google Scholar
[10]	He S X, Tian R, Wu W, Li W D, Wang D P 2021 IJEM 3 012001 Google Scholar
[11]	Ward B W, Notte J A, Economou N P 2006 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 24 2871 Google Scholar
[12]	Rahman F H M, McVey S, Farkas L, Notte J A, Tan S, Livengood R H 2012 Scanning 34 129 Google Scholar
[13]	Smith N S, Notte J A, Steele A V 2014 Mrs Bull. 39 329 Google Scholar
[14]	Prodan J V, Phillips W D, Metcalf H 1982 Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 1149 Google Scholar
[15]	Chu S, Hollberg L, Bjorkholm J E, Cable A, Ashkin A 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 48 Google Scholar
[16]	Softley T P 2023 P. Roy. Soc. A-Math. Phys. 479 20220806 Google Scholar
[17]	McClelland J J, Steele A V, Knuffman B, Twedt K A, Schwarzkopf A, Wilson T M 2016 Appl. Phys. Rev. 3 011302 Google Scholar
[18]	Freinkman B G, Eletskii A V, Zaitsev S I 2003 Jetp Lett. 78 255 Google Scholar
[19]	van der Geer S B, Reijnders M P, de Loos M J, Vredenbregt E J D, Mutsaers P H A, Luiten O J 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 102 094312 Google Scholar
[20]	Claessens B J, Reijnders M P, Taban G, Luiten O J, Vredenbregt E J D 2007 Phys. Plasmas 14 093101 Google Scholar
[21]	Hanssen J L, Hill S B, Orloff J, McClelland J J 2008 Nano Lett. 8 2844 Google Scholar
[22]	Murphy D, Speirs R W, Sheludko D V, Putkunz C T, McCulloch A J, Sparkes B M, Scholten R E 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4489 Google Scholar
[23]	Kime L, Fioretti A, Bruneau Y, Porfido N, Fuso F, Viteau M, Khalili G, Santic N, Gloter A, Rasser B, Sudraud P, Pillet P, Comparat D 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 33424 Google Scholar
[24]	Wouters S H W, ten Haaf G, Notermans R P M J W, Debernardi N, Mutsaers P H A, Luiten O J, Vredenbregt E J D 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 063817 Google Scholar
[25]	ten Haaf G, Wouters S H W, van der Geer S B, Vredenbregt E J D, Mutsaers P H A 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 244301 Google Scholar
[26]	Knuffman B, Steele A V, McClelland J J 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 114 044303 Google Scholar
[27]	Schnitzler W, Linke N M, Fickler R, Meijer J, Schmidt-Kaler F, Singer K 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 070501 Google Scholar
[28]	Sahin C, Geppert P, Muellers A, Ott H 2017 New J. Phys. 19 123005 Google Scholar
[29]	Hansch T W, Schawlow A L 1975 Opt. Commun. 13 68 Google Scholar
[30]	Phillips W D 1998 Rev. Mod. Phys. 70 721 Google Scholar
[31]	Chu S 1998 Rev. Mod. Phys. 70 685 Google Scholar
[32]	Cohen-Tannoudji C N 1998 Rev. Mod. Phys. 70 707 Google Scholar
[33]	王义遒 2007 原子的激光冷却与陷俘(北京: 北京大学出版社) Wang Y Q 2007 Laser Cooled and Trapped Atoms (Beijing: Peking University Press
[34]	Lett P D, Watts R N, Westbrook C I, Phillips W D, Gould P L, Metcalf H J 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 169 Google Scholar
[35]	Reijnders M P, van Kruisbergen P A, Taban G, van der Geer S B, Mutsaers P H A, Vredenbregt E J D, Luiten O J 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 034802 Google Scholar
[36]	Reijnders M P, Debernardi N, van der Geer S B, Mutsaers P H A, Vredenbregt E J D, Luiten O J 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 034802 Google Scholar
[37]	Reijnders M P, Debernardi N, van der Geer S B, Mutsaers P H A, Vredenbregt E J D, Luiten O J 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 033302 Google Scholar
[38]	Debernardi N, Reijnders M P, Engelen W J, Clevis T T J, Mutsaers P H A, Luiten O J, Vredenbregt E J D 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 110 024501 Google Scholar
[39]	Thompson D J, Murphy D, Speirs R W, van Bijnen R M W, McCulloch A J, Scholten R E, Sparkes B M 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 193202 Google Scholar
[40]	Murphy D, Scholten R E, Sparkes B M 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 214802 Google Scholar
[41]	Duspayev A, Raithel G 2023 Phys. Rev. Appl. 19 044051 Google Scholar
[42]	Hill S B, McClelland J J 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 3128 Google Scholar
[43]	Steele A V, Knuffman B, McClelland J J, Orloff J 2010 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 28 C6F1 Google Scholar
[44]	Steele A V, Knuffman B, McClelland J J 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 104308 Google Scholar
[45]	Knuffman B, Steele A V, Orloff J, McClelland J J 2011 New J. Phys. 13 103035 Google Scholar
[46]	Twedt K A, Chen L, McClelland J J 2014 Ultramicroscopy 142 24 Google Scholar
[47]	Gardner J R, McGehee W R, McClelland J J 2019 J. Appl. Phys. 125 074904 Google Scholar
[48]	Gardner J R, McGehee W R, Stiles M D, McClelland J J 2020 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 38 052803 Google Scholar
[49]	Bömmels J, Leber E, Gopalan A, Weber J M, Barsotti S, Ruf M W, Hotop H 2001 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72 4098 Google Scholar
[50]	Viteau M, Reveillard M, Kime L, Rasser B, Sudraud P, Bruneau Y, Khalili G, Pillet P, Comparat D, Guerri I, Fioretti A, Ciampini D, Allegrini M, Fuso F 2016 Ultramicroscopy 164 70 Google Scholar
[51]	ten Haaf G, de Raadt T C H, Offermans G P, van Rens J F M, Mutsaers P H A, Vredenbregt E J D, Wouters S H W 2017 Phys. Rev. Appl. 7 054013 Google Scholar
[52]	ten Haaf G, Wouters S H W, Mutsaers P H A, Vredenbregt E J D 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 053412 Google Scholar
[53]	Xu S, Li Y, Vredenbregt E J D 2022 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 40 042801 Google Scholar
[54]	Kempshall B W, Schwarz S M, Prenitzer B I, Giannuzzi L A, Irwin R B, Stevie F A 2001 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 19 749 Google Scholar
[55]	Utke I, Michler J, Winkler R, Plank H 2020 Micromachines 11 397 Google Scholar
[56]	Li Y, Xu S, Sezen M, Misirlioglu F B, Vredenbregt E J D 2023 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 41 042803 Google Scholar
[57]	Xu S, Li Y, Verheijen M A, Kieft E R, Vredenbregt E J D 2023 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 41 042804 Google Scholar
[58]	Dieckmann K, Spreeuw R J C, Weidemuller M, Walraven J T M 1998 Phys. Rev. A 58 3891 Google Scholar
[59]	Lu Z T, Corwin K L, Renn M J, Anderson M H, Cornell E A, Wieman C E 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3331 Google Scholar
[60]	Steele A V, Schwarzkopf A, McClelland J J, Knuffman B 2017 Nano Futures 1 015005 Google Scholar
[61]	Steele A, Schwarzkopf A, Knuffman B 2021 Microsc. Microanal. 27 24 Google Scholar
[62]	Brown L S, Gabrielse G 1986 Rev. Mod. Phys. 58 233 Google Scholar
[63]	Raizen M G, Gilligan J M, Bergquist J C, Itano W M, Wineland D J 1992 J. Mod. Optic. 39 233 Google Scholar
[64]	Fickler R, Schnitzler W, Linke N M, Schmidt-Kaler F, Singer K 2009 J. Mod. Optic. 56 2061 Google Scholar
[65]	Schnitzler W, Jacob G, Fickler R, Schmidt-Kaler F, Singer K 2010 New J. Phys. 12 065023 Google Scholar
[66]	Jacob G, Groot-Berning K, Wolf S, Ulm S, Couturier L, Dawkins S T, Poschinger U G, Schmidt-Kaler F, Singer K 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 043001 Google Scholar
[67]	Groot-Berning K, Kornher T, Jacob G, Stopp F, Dawkins S T, Kolesov R, Wrachtrup J, Singer K, Schmidt-Kaler F 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 106802 Google Scholar
[68]	Groot-Berning K, Jacob G, Osterkamp C, Jelezko F, Schmidt-Kaler F 2021 New J. Phys. 23 063067 Google Scholar
[69]	McCulloch A J, Speirs R W, Wissenberg S H, Tielen R P M, Sparkes B M, Scholten R E 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 043423 Google Scholar
[70]	Dörner R, Mergel V, Jagutzki O, Spielberger L, Ullrich J, Moshammer R, Schmidt-Böcking H 2000 Phys. Rep. 330 95 Google Scholar
[71]	Depaola B D, Morgenstern R, Andersen N (Arimondo E, et al. ed) 2008 Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics (Vol. 55) pp139–189
[72]	Lopez C, Trimeche A, Comparat D, Picard Y J 2019 Phys. Rev. Appl. 11 064049 Google Scholar
[73]	Hahn R, Trimeche A, Lopez C, Comparat D, Picard Y J 2021 Phys. Rev. A 103 042821 Google Scholar
[74]	Fang F, Zhou W C, Li Y F, Qian D B, Luo C J, Zhao D M, Ma X W, Yang J 2021 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 92 043103 Google Scholar
[75]	Zhou W C, Fang F, Luo C J, Qian D B, Yang J, Lu L 2023 J. Appl. Phys. 133 034901 Google Scholar
[76]	van Bijnen R M W, Ravensbergen C, Bakker D J, Dijk G J, Kokkelmans S J J M F, Vredenbregt E J D 2015 New J. Phys. 17 023045 Google Scholar
[77]	Beterov I I, Tretyakov D B, Entin V M, Yakshina E A, Ryabtsev I I, MacCormick C, Bergamini S 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 023413 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 超冷离子源的发展路线和重要研究进展

Figure 1. Roadmap and advances of ultracold ion source.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 原子的一维冷却示意图　(a)速度为$ {\mathrm{\nu }} $的原子与动量为$ {\mathrm{\hslash }}\kappa $在单方向上的光子相互作用; (b)原子吸收定向光子后, 速度减小了$ \hslash \kappa /m $; (c)激发态原子经自发辐射过程随机释放光子回到基态; (d)二能级系统中原子对负失谐光子的吸收($ \hslash \omega $)和发射过程($ \hslash {\omega }_{0} $)

Figure 2. The schematic of one-dimensional cooling atoms: (a) An incoming atom with velocity $ {\mathrm{\nu }} $ interaction with laser with the specific momentum $ {\mathrm{\hslash }}\kappa $ in a single direction; (b) the photon is absorbed and the velocity of the atom has been reduced $ \hslash \kappa /m $ induced by the net momentum transfer; (c) after spontaneous emission, the excited state atom emits a photon in all directions; (d) in a two-level system, the absorption of a red-detuned photon by an atom and the subsequent emission process.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 电离过程的3种模式示意图^[17]　(a) 轴向电离模式; (b) 横向电离模式; (c) 交叉双光子模式

Figure 3. The sketch of ionization modes in a MOTIS^[17]: (a) Axial mode; (b) transverse mode; (c) two-photon mode

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 能散和束流能量除电荷量后的关系, 插图为5种不同束流电荷量下能散与束流能量的关系^[35]

Figure 4. The five measured energy spread and beam energy curves from inset scaled by the bunch charge to a single curve. The inset shows the measured energy spread as a function of the beam energy for five different bunch charges^[35]

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 含时电场对超冷离子束相空间的操控　(a)纵向相对能散σ_U/U与脉冲电场宽度U之间的关系; (b)双极性电场(V_p = 1000 V)条件下, 离子束在x方向上的横向尺寸σ_x 与V_n 的函数关系^[36]

Figure 5. Phase-space manipulation of ultracold ion bunches with time-dependent fields: (a) The longitudinal relative energy spread σ_U/U versus U is plotted; (b) demonstration of focusing by bipolar voltage pulses with V_p = 1000 V, the transverse size in the x direction σ_x of the bunch on the detector is measured as a function of V_n^[36].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 离子束斑与束流能量倒数的关系, 其斜率与有效源温度T成正比, 图中实心点为实验测量结果, 红色实线代表线性拟合^[38]

Figure 6. Final spot radius squared $ {\sigma }_{x{\mathrm{f}}}^{2} $ vs. the reciprocal of the bunch energy 1/U, the thick line is a linear fit, the slope of which is proportional to the effective source temperature T^[38].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 7 四种离子束分布及其空间电荷驱动的扩散^[39]　(a) 径向平均激发光轮廓(实线)与相对激发概率(虚线)的关系; (b) 径向扩散因子与离子数的关系

Figure 7. Four ion bunch distributions and their expansion properties^[39]: (a) Measured radially averaged excitation laser profiles (solid lines) and desired profiles (dashed lines), plotted as the relative excitation probability; (b) radial expansion factors against ion number for each shape individually.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 8 分子动力学模拟里德伯阻塞机制抑制无序诱导加热^[40]　(a)不同阻塞半径条件下, 离子平衡时的发射度和温度随扩散时间的关系; (b)不同扩散时间下, 不同阻塞半径对于阻塞与无序发射度比率的影响

Figure 8. Rydberg blockade mechanism suppressing disorder-induced heating with molecular dynamics simulation^[40]: (a) The relationship between the emittance and temperature of ions at equilibrium under different blocking radii, as a function of diffusion time; (b) suppression of disorder-induced heating, expressed as the ratio of blockaded to disordered emittance for different blockade parameters at different expansion times.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 9 冷离子源中电场分布测量^[41]　(a)实验装置示意图; (b)⁸⁵Rb能级示意图及光电离和激发所需的激光波长; (c)低离子计数率和(d)高离子计数率条件下, 实验测量的57F_5/2的Stark 图; (e), (f)对应的模拟Stark图

Figure 9. Measurement of electric field in a cold ion source^[41]: (a) Sketch of the experimental setup; (b) diagram of the utilized ⁸⁵Rb energy levels and configuration of laser beams for photoionization and excitation; (c), (d) experimental Stark maps of 57F_5/2 and the neighboring hydrogenic states at the different γ values; (e), (f) the corresponding simulated Stark maps with empirically determined ion rates.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 10 Cr-MOTIS装置示意图^[43]

Figure 10. The schematic of Cr-MOTIS^[43].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 11 Li-MOTIS-FIB装置示意图^[45]

Figure 11. The sketch of Lithium FIB system^[45].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 12 (a) Li-MOTIS装置示意图; (b)不同紫外激发功率(P_exc)下离子源亮度(B_p)与束流流强(P_exc)的关系^[47]

Figure 12. (a) Schematic of Li-MOTIS; (b) peak normalized brightness (B_p) as a function of total current (I_tot) for a range of UV excitation powers (P_exc)^[47].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 13 场电离里德伯态原子方案的CABIS装置结构示意图^[23], 利用2D-MOT技术对高通量原子束进行横向冷却和压缩, 离子或电子(取决于电极的极性)由场电离冷里德伯态原子产生, 之后束流在FIB系统中被加速和聚焦

Figure 13. Sketch of the ultracold electron-ion source producing from CABIS^[23], an intense effusive atomic beam is transversely cooled and compressed using laser-cooling techniques, electrons or ions (depending on electrode polarities) are produced by laser excitation to Rydberg states that are then field ionized, the beam is finally focused and accelerated in a FIB column.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 14 拍摄的碳衬底上锡球的图像比较　(a)束流能量5 keV, 束流电流7 pA的Cs⁺-FIB; (b)束流能量5 keV, 束流电流20 pA的商业化产品Ga-LMIS FIB^[50]

Figure 14. Comparison between images acquired on a tin on carbon test sample: (a) Our system at 5 keV ion beam energy and 7 pA current; (b) a commercial Ga-LMIS FIB at 5 keV ion beam energy and current 20 pA^[50].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 15 腔增强电离方案的CABIS装置结构示意图(未按比例绘制)^[51]

Figure 15. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup (not drawn to scale) of CABIS for the cavity enhanced photoionization^[51].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 16 Rb-CABIS-FIB装置示意图(左), 不同剂量Rb⁺和Ga⁺刻蚀材料的SEM图像(右图)　(a) 8.5 keV的Rb⁺刻蚀后GaAs靶俯视图; (b) 多晶Au靶俯视图(0°); (c) Au靶侧视图(52°); (d)多晶Cu靶侧视图(52°); (e) 30 keV的Ga⁺刻蚀后Cu靶侧视图(52°)^[53], 标尺为1 μm

Figure 16. Schematic of corresponding Rb-CABIS-FIB (left), SEM images of Rb⁺ and Ga⁺ milling patterns on standard samples (right): (a) Top view (0°) of milling patterns on GaAs at 8.5 keV; (b) top view (0°) of milling patterns on polycrystalline Au; (c) tilt view (52°) of (b); (d) tilt view (52°) of milling patterns on polycrystalline Cu; (e) tilt view (52°) of 30 keV Ga⁺ milling patterns on polycrystalline Cu, ion dose is marked below each pattern^[53], scale bar is 1 μm.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 17 (a)慢原子束CABIS装置结构示意图, 显示了离子束产生的4个阶段, 即带推杆束磁光压缩器的二维磁光阱、光学糖蜜和电离; (b)标准锡球二次电子图像, 获取自CABIS的聚焦10 keV, 1 pA Cs+离子束^[60]

Figure 17. (a) Schematic of the slow cold atomic beam ion source, showing the four stages of ion beam production: 2D magneto-optical trap with pusher beam magneto-optical compressor, optical molasses, and ionization; (b) secondary electron image of a standard tin ball resolution target acquired using a focused 10 keV, 1 pA Cs⁺ ion beam from the CABIS^[60].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 18 (a) 单离子显微镜示意图; (b) 波导腔结构的SEM图像, 孔直径约为150 nm; (c)单离子源成像结果, 分辨率为每像素(25 nm×25 nm), 图中的全部信息基于4141个提取的离子中的2659个; (d)泊松分布的离子源成像结果^[66]

Figure 18. (a) Sketch of the single ion microscope; (b) SEM image of the waveguide-cavity structure, holes have a diameter of about 150 nm; (c) scan of the cavity structure using one ion at each lateral position, with a resolution of (25 nm× 25 nm) per pixel, the entire information in the picture is based on 2659 transmission events out of 4141 extracted ions; (d) imaging a source with emulated Poissonian behavior^[66].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 19 (a) 单离子注入装置的示意图; (b)离子荧光的成像; (c) Ca⁺和Pr⁺离子束斑测量的直方图^[67]; (d)植入区域的共聚焦显微镜图像^[68]

Figure 19. (a) Sketch of the single-ion implantation setup; (b) fluorescence of ions imaged; (c) histograms of the profiling edge measurement for Ca⁺ and Pr⁺ ions^[67]; (d) confocal images of the implanted regions^[68].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 20 电子-离子符合装置示意图^[69]

Figure 20. Schematic of the electron-ion coincidence apparatus^[69]

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 21 (a)实验装置及流程示意图; (b)选定区域离子轨迹二维校正; (c) 在FPGA中实现的虚拟掩模的应用^[72]

Figure 21. (a) Sketch of experiment set and procedure; (b) 2D correction on a selected zone for the ion trajectory; (c) application of a virtual mask implemented in the FPGA^[72].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

[1]	Hoeflich K, Hobler G, Allen F I, Wirtz T, Rius G, McElwee-White L, Krasheninnikov A V, Schmidt M, Utke I, Klingner N, Osenberg M, Cordoba R, Djurabekova F, Manke I, Moll P, Manoccio M, De Teresa J M, Bischoff L, Michler J, De Castro O, Delobbe A, Dunne P, Dobrovolskiy O V, Frese N, Goelzhaeuser A, Mazarov P, Koelle D, Moeller W, Perez-Murano F, Philipp P, Vollnhals F, Hlawacek G 2023 Appl. Phys. Rev. 10 041311 Google Scholar
[2]	Manoccio M, Esposito M, Passaseo A, Cuscuna M, Tasco V 2021 Micromachines 12 6 Google Scholar
[3]	Sloyan K, Melkonyan H, Apostoleris H, Dahlem M S, Chiesa M, Al Ghaferi A 2021 Nanotechnology 32 472004 Google Scholar
[4]	Li P, Chen S Y, Dai H F, Yang Z M, Chen Z Q, Wang Y S, Chen Y Q, Peng W Q, Shan W B, Duan H G 2021 Nanoscale 13 1529 Google Scholar
[5]	Lesik M, Spinicelli P, Pezzagna S, Happel P, Jacques V, Salord O, Rasser B, Delobbe A, Sudraud P, Tallaire A, Meijer J, Roch J-F 2013 Physica Status Solidi a-Applications and Materials Science 210 2055 Google Scholar
[6]	Bradac C, Gao W, Forneris J, Trusheim M E, Aharonovich I 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 5625 Google Scholar
[7]	Haruyama M, Onoda S, Higuchi T, Kada W, Chiba A, Hirano Y, Teraji T, Igarashi R, Kawai S, Kawarada H, Ishii Y, Fukuda R, Tanii T, Isoya J, Ohshima T, Hanaizumi O 2019 Nat. Commun. 10 2664 Google Scholar
[8]	Swanson L W, Schwind G A 1978 J. Appl. Phys. 49 5655 Google Scholar
[9]	Bischoff L, Mazarov P, Bruchhaus L, Gierak J 2016 Appl. Phys. Rev. 3 021101 Google Scholar
[10]	He S X, Tian R, Wu W, Li W D, Wang D P 2021 IJEM 3 012001 Google Scholar
[11]	Ward B W, Notte J A, Economou N P 2006 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 24 2871 Google Scholar
[12]	Rahman F H M, McVey S, Farkas L, Notte J A, Tan S, Livengood R H 2012 Scanning 34 129 Google Scholar
[13]	Smith N S, Notte J A, Steele A V 2014 Mrs Bull. 39 329 Google Scholar
[14]	Prodan J V, Phillips W D, Metcalf H 1982 Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 1149 Google Scholar
[15]	Chu S, Hollberg L, Bjorkholm J E, Cable A, Ashkin A 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 48 Google Scholar
[16]	Softley T P 2023 P. Roy. Soc. A-Math. Phys. 479 20220806 Google Scholar
[17]	McClelland J J, Steele A V, Knuffman B, Twedt K A, Schwarzkopf A, Wilson T M 2016 Appl. Phys. Rev. 3 011302 Google Scholar
[18]	Freinkman B G, Eletskii A V, Zaitsev S I 2003 Jetp Lett. 78 255 Google Scholar
[19]	van der Geer S B, Reijnders M P, de Loos M J, Vredenbregt E J D, Mutsaers P H A, Luiten O J 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 102 094312 Google Scholar
[20]	Claessens B J, Reijnders M P, Taban G, Luiten O J, Vredenbregt E J D 2007 Phys. Plasmas 14 093101 Google Scholar
[21]	Hanssen J L, Hill S B, Orloff J, McClelland J J 2008 Nano Lett. 8 2844 Google Scholar
[22]	Murphy D, Speirs R W, Sheludko D V, Putkunz C T, McCulloch A J, Sparkes B M, Scholten R E 2014 Nat. Commun. 5 4489 Google Scholar
[23]	Kime L, Fioretti A, Bruneau Y, Porfido N, Fuso F, Viteau M, Khalili G, Santic N, Gloter A, Rasser B, Sudraud P, Pillet P, Comparat D 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 33424 Google Scholar
[24]	Wouters S H W, ten Haaf G, Notermans R P M J W, Debernardi N, Mutsaers P H A, Luiten O J, Vredenbregt E J D 2014 Phys. Rev. A 90 063817 Google Scholar
[25]	ten Haaf G, Wouters S H W, van der Geer S B, Vredenbregt E J D, Mutsaers P H A 2014 J. Appl. Phys. 116 244301 Google Scholar
[26]	Knuffman B, Steele A V, McClelland J J 2013 J. Appl. Phys. 114 044303 Google Scholar
[27]	Schnitzler W, Linke N M, Fickler R, Meijer J, Schmidt-Kaler F, Singer K 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 070501 Google Scholar
[28]	Sahin C, Geppert P, Muellers A, Ott H 2017 New J. Phys. 19 123005 Google Scholar
[29]	Hansch T W, Schawlow A L 1975 Opt. Commun. 13 68 Google Scholar
[30]	Phillips W D 1998 Rev. Mod. Phys. 70 721 Google Scholar
[31]	Chu S 1998 Rev. Mod. Phys. 70 685 Google Scholar
[32]	Cohen-Tannoudji C N 1998 Rev. Mod. Phys. 70 707 Google Scholar
[33]	王义遒 2007 原子的激光冷却与陷俘(北京: 北京大学出版社) Wang Y Q 2007 Laser Cooled and Trapped Atoms (Beijing: Peking University Press
[34]	Lett P D, Watts R N, Westbrook C I, Phillips W D, Gould P L, Metcalf H J 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 169 Google Scholar
[35]	Reijnders M P, van Kruisbergen P A, Taban G, van der Geer S B, Mutsaers P H A, Vredenbregt E J D, Luiten O J 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 034802 Google Scholar
[36]	Reijnders M P, Debernardi N, van der Geer S B, Mutsaers P H A, Vredenbregt E J D, Luiten O J 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 034802 Google Scholar
[37]	Reijnders M P, Debernardi N, van der Geer S B, Mutsaers P H A, Vredenbregt E J D, Luiten O J 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 033302 Google Scholar
[38]	Debernardi N, Reijnders M P, Engelen W J, Clevis T T J, Mutsaers P H A, Luiten O J, Vredenbregt E J D 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 110 024501 Google Scholar
[39]	Thompson D J, Murphy D, Speirs R W, van Bijnen R M W, McCulloch A J, Scholten R E, Sparkes B M 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 193202 Google Scholar
[40]	Murphy D, Scholten R E, Sparkes B M 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 214802 Google Scholar
[41]	Duspayev A, Raithel G 2023 Phys. Rev. Appl. 19 044051 Google Scholar
[42]	Hill S B, McClelland J J 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 3128 Google Scholar
[43]	Steele A V, Knuffman B, McClelland J J, Orloff J 2010 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 28 C6F1 Google Scholar
[44]	Steele A V, Knuffman B, McClelland J J 2011 J. Appl. Phys. 109 104308 Google Scholar
[45]	Knuffman B, Steele A V, Orloff J, McClelland J J 2011 New J. Phys. 13 103035 Google Scholar
[46]	Twedt K A, Chen L, McClelland J J 2014 Ultramicroscopy 142 24 Google Scholar
[47]	Gardner J R, McGehee W R, McClelland J J 2019 J. Appl. Phys. 125 074904 Google Scholar
[48]	Gardner J R, McGehee W R, Stiles M D, McClelland J J 2020 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 38 052803 Google Scholar
[49]	Bömmels J, Leber E, Gopalan A, Weber J M, Barsotti S, Ruf M W, Hotop H 2001 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72 4098 Google Scholar
[50]	Viteau M, Reveillard M, Kime L, Rasser B, Sudraud P, Bruneau Y, Khalili G, Pillet P, Comparat D, Guerri I, Fioretti A, Ciampini D, Allegrini M, Fuso F 2016 Ultramicroscopy 164 70 Google Scholar
[51]	ten Haaf G, de Raadt T C H, Offermans G P, van Rens J F M, Mutsaers P H A, Vredenbregt E J D, Wouters S H W 2017 Phys. Rev. Appl. 7 054013 Google Scholar
[52]	ten Haaf G, Wouters S H W, Mutsaers P H A, Vredenbregt E J D 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 053412 Google Scholar
[53]	Xu S, Li Y, Vredenbregt E J D 2022 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 40 042801 Google Scholar
[54]	Kempshall B W, Schwarz S M, Prenitzer B I, Giannuzzi L A, Irwin R B, Stevie F A 2001 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 19 749 Google Scholar
[55]	Utke I, Michler J, Winkler R, Plank H 2020 Micromachines 11 397 Google Scholar
[56]	Li Y, Xu S, Sezen M, Misirlioglu F B, Vredenbregt E J D 2023 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 41 042803 Google Scholar
[57]	Xu S, Li Y, Verheijen M A, Kieft E R, Vredenbregt E J D 2023 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 41 042804 Google Scholar
[58]	Dieckmann K, Spreeuw R J C, Weidemuller M, Walraven J T M 1998 Phys. Rev. A 58 3891 Google Scholar
[59]	Lu Z T, Corwin K L, Renn M J, Anderson M H, Cornell E A, Wieman C E 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 3331 Google Scholar
[60]	Steele A V, Schwarzkopf A, McClelland J J, Knuffman B 2017 Nano Futures 1 015005 Google Scholar
[61]	Steele A, Schwarzkopf A, Knuffman B 2021 Microsc. Microanal. 27 24 Google Scholar
[62]	Brown L S, Gabrielse G 1986 Rev. Mod. Phys. 58 233 Google Scholar
[63]	Raizen M G, Gilligan J M, Bergquist J C, Itano W M, Wineland D J 1992 J. Mod. Optic. 39 233 Google Scholar
[64]	Fickler R, Schnitzler W, Linke N M, Schmidt-Kaler F, Singer K 2009 J. Mod. Optic. 56 2061 Google Scholar
[65]	Schnitzler W, Jacob G, Fickler R, Schmidt-Kaler F, Singer K 2010 New J. Phys. 12 065023 Google Scholar
[66]	Jacob G, Groot-Berning K, Wolf S, Ulm S, Couturier L, Dawkins S T, Poschinger U G, Schmidt-Kaler F, Singer K 2016 Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 043001 Google Scholar
[67]	Groot-Berning K, Kornher T, Jacob G, Stopp F, Dawkins S T, Kolesov R, Wrachtrup J, Singer K, Schmidt-Kaler F 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 106802 Google Scholar
[68]	Groot-Berning K, Jacob G, Osterkamp C, Jelezko F, Schmidt-Kaler F 2021 New J. Phys. 23 063067 Google Scholar
[69]	McCulloch A J, Speirs R W, Wissenberg S H, Tielen R P M, Sparkes B M, Scholten R E 2018 Phys. Rev. A 97 043423 Google Scholar
[70]	Dörner R, Mergel V, Jagutzki O, Spielberger L, Ullrich J, Moshammer R, Schmidt-Böcking H 2000 Phys. Rep. 330 95 Google Scholar
[71]	Depaola B D, Morgenstern R, Andersen N (Arimondo E, et al. ed) 2008 Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics (Vol. 55) pp139–189
[72]	Lopez C, Trimeche A, Comparat D, Picard Y J 2019 Phys. Rev. Appl. 11 064049 Google Scholar
[73]	Hahn R, Trimeche A, Lopez C, Comparat D, Picard Y J 2021 Phys. Rev. A 103 042821 Google Scholar
[74]	Fang F, Zhou W C, Li Y F, Qian D B, Luo C J, Zhao D M, Ma X W, Yang J 2021 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 92 043103 Google Scholar
[75]	Zhou W C, Fang F, Luo C J, Qian D B, Yang J, Lu L 2023 J. Appl. Phys. 133 034901 Google Scholar
[76]	van Bijnen R M W, Ravensbergen C, Bakker D J, Dijk G J, Kokkelmans S J J M F, Vredenbregt E J D 2015 New J. Phys. 17 023045 Google Scholar
[77]	Beterov I I, Tretyakov D B, Entin V M, Yakshina E A, Ryabtsev I I, MacCormick C, Bergamini S 2011 Phys. Rev. A 84 023413 Google Scholar

[1]	Tang Shi-Yi, Ma Zi-Qi, Zou Yun-Xiao, An Xiao-Kai, Yang Dong-Jie, Liu Liang-Liang, Cui Sui-Han, Wu Zhong-Zhen. Cathode etching phenomenon of high beam-anode ion source and its elimination measures. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(18): 185202. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20240494
[2]	Li Sang-Ya, Zhang Ai-Lin, Xu Xin, Lü Tao, Wang Shi-Kang, Luo Qing. Uniformity optimization of ion beam sputtering coating equipment based on strong current ion source. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(5): 058101. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231491
[3]	Cui Sui-Han, Zuo Wei, Huang Jian, Li Xi-Teng, Chen Qiu-Hao, Guo Yu-Xiang, Yang Chao, Wu Zhong-Can, Ma Zheng-Yong, Fu Jin-Yu, Tian Xiu-Bo, Zhu Jian-Hao, Wu Zhong-Zhen. High-efficient particle-in-cell/Monte Carlo model for complex solution domain andsimulation of anode layer ion source. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(8): 085202. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222394
[4]	Fu Yu-Liang, Yang Juan, Wang Bin, Hu Zhan, Xia Xu, Mu Hao. Numerical study on abnormal flameout of 2-cm electron cyclotron resonance ion source. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(8): 085203. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212151
[5]	Wu Wen-Bin, Peng Shi-Xiang, Zhang Ai-Lin, Zhou Hai-Jing, Ma Teng-Hao, Jiang Yao-Xiang, Li Kai, Cui Bu-Jian, Guo Zhi-Yu, Chen Jia-Er. Global model of miniature electron cyclotron resonance ion source. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(14): 145204. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20212250
[6]	Xia Xu, Yang Juan, Fu Yu-Liang, Wu Xian-Ming, Geng Hai, Hu Zhan. Numerical simulation of influence of magnetic field on plasma characteristics and surface current of ion source of 2-cm electron cyclotron resonance ion thruster. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(7): 075204. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20201667
[7]	Chen Shan-Shan, Liu Xing, Liu Zhi-Guang, Li Jia-Fang. Focused ion beam based nano-kirigami/origami for three-dimensional micro/nanomanufacturing and photonic applications. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(24): 248101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20191494
[8]	Jin Yi-Zhou, Yang Juan, Feng Bing-Bing, Luo Li-Tao, Tang Ming-Jie. Ion extraction experiment for electron cyclotron resonance ion source with different magnetic topology. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(4): 045201. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.045201
[9]	Yang Chao, Yin Mao-Wei, Shang Li-Ping, Wang Wei, Liu Yi, Xia Lian-Sheng, Deng Jian-Jun. Numerical simulation research of plasma characteristics in a multi-cusp proton source based on magnets layout. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(8): 085203. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.085203
[10]	Tang Ming-Jie, Yang Juan, Jin Yi-Zhou, Luo Li-Tao, Feng Bing-Bing. Experimental optimization in ion source configuration of a miniature electron cyclotron resonance ion thruster. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(21): 215202. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.215202
[11]	Yang Chao, Liao Fang-Yan, Xie Hong-Quan. A full three-dimensional numerical diagnosis of Japan Atomic Energy Agency 10 Ampere multi-cusp negative hydrogen ion source. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(21): 215202. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.215202
[12]	Yang Chao, Liu Da-Gang, Xia Meng-Zhong, Wang Hui-Hui, Wang Xiao-Min, Liu La-Qun, Peng Kai. 3D numerical study on volume production efficiency of J-PARC multicusp ion source. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(18): 185204. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.185204
[13]	Yang Chao, Liu Da-Gang, Xia Meng-Zhong, Wang Hui-Hui, Wang Xiao-Min, Liu La-Qun, Peng Kai. Numerical optimization of volume production efficiency of the JAERI 10 A ion source. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(18): 185205. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.185205
[14]	Yang Chao, Liu Da-Gang, Liu La-Qun, Xia Meng-Zhong, Wang Hui-Hui, Wang Xiao-Ming. 3D simulation of the electron energy distribution in negative hydrogen ion source. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(15): 155205. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.155205
[15]	Yang Chao, Liu Da-Gang, Chen Ying, Xia Meng-Zhong, Wang Xue-Qiong, Wang Xiao-Min. 3D simulation optimization and design of multicusp ion source. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(13): 135203. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.135203
[16]	Yang Chao, Liu Da-Gang, Wang Xiao-Ming, Liu La-Qun, Wang Xue-Qiong, Liu Sheng-Gang. A three-dimensional particle-in-cell/Monte Carlo computer simulation based on negative hydrogen ion source. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(4): 045204. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.045204
[17]	. Properties of Co nano-films deposited on monocrystalline silicon surface by ion beam sputtering. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(12): 7158-7164. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.7158
[18]	WANG ZHEN-XIA, YU GUO-QING, RUAN MEI-LING, ZHU FU-YING, ZHU DE-ZHANG, PAN HAO-CHANG, XU HONG-JIE. STUDIES OF HEXAGONAL DIAMOND OF NANO-GRAIN IN GRAPHITE SURFACE PRODUCED BY Ar+ ION BOMBARDMENT. Acta Physica Sinica, 2000, 49(8): 1524-1527. doi: 10.7498/aps.49.1524
[19]	. ОПРЕДЕЛЕНИЕ ОПТИМАЛЬНЫХ РАЗМЕРОВ ВЫТЯГИВАЮЩЕГО УСТРОЙСТВА ВЫСОКОЧАСТОТНОГО ИОННОГО ИСТОЧНИКА. Acta Physica Sinica, 1963, 19(12): 782-790. doi: 10.7498/aps.19.782
[20]	. . Acta Physica Sinica, 1960, 16(2): 107-110. doi: 10.7498/aps.16.107

Catalog

Vol. 73, Issue 17 - 2024-09-05

Metrics

Abstract views: 1922
PDF Downloads: 69
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板