-
The Compton camera for γ-ray imaging has the advantages of light weight, high detection efficiency and wide imaging energy range. However, it is difficult for the detection system to distinguish the Compton scattering event and scattering photon absorption event, which results in erroneous image reconstruction. In this paper, a simulation model of Compton camera based on a three-dimensional position-sensitive CdZnTe detector is constructed using GEANT4 program. The detection of characteristic γ-ray from a far-field 137Cs point-like source is simulated. The location of the interaction and energy deposition in the detector are recorded by means of event-by-event. The Compton scattering angle of effective Compton scattering events and imaging of the radioactive source are reconstructed using the simple back-projection algorithm which is a suitable image reconstruction algorithm for real-time imaging scenes. The effect of event sequence reconstruction on the imaging resolution and its improvement are investigated. The results show that the impact of incorrect sequence events on imaging is mainly in the region within 30° from the source position, resulting in a decrease in the density of the image point distribution at the source position. Incorrect reconstructed image points are generated near the source position and form a ring at 26°. The percentage of correctly sequenced events increase to 82% using Compton edge test and simple comparison method based on the deposited energy for sequencing events. The density of the image point distribution at the source location is improved by 47%, and the incorrect reconstruction of the image point distribution near the source location is greatly suppressed, resulting in an improved imaging resolution. The results provide support for the design of Compton camera and the optimization of image reconstruction.
-
Keywords:
- Compton camera /
- GEANT4 /
- sequence reconstruction /
- imaging resolution
-
[1] Todd R W, Nightingale J M, Everett D B 1974 Nature 251 132
[2] Gal O, Gmar M, Ivanov O P, Lainé F, Lamadie F, Le Goaller C, Mahé C, Manach E, Stepanov V E 2006 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 563 233
[3] Sun S F 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 198701(in Chinese) [孙世峰 2020 物理学报 69 198701]
[4] Yang J, Tan F, Wu Y C, Gu Y Q 2016 Nucl. Electron. & Detect. Technol. 36 966（in Chinese） [杨靖, 谭放, 吴玉迟, 谷渝秋 2016 核电子学与探测技术 36 966]
[5] Strong A 1996 Space Sci. Rev 76 205
[6] Kamae T, Hanada N, Enomoto R 1988 IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 35 352
[7] Mihailescu L, Vetter K, Burks M, Hull E, Craig W 2007 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 570 89
[8] He Z, Li W, Knoll G, Wehe D, Berry J, Stahle C 1999 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 422 173
[9] Du Y, He Z, Knoll G, Wehe D, Li W 2001 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 457 203
[10] Lehner C E, He Z, Zhang F 2004 IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 51 1618
[11] Wahl C G, Kaye W, Wang W, Zhang F, Jaworski J, Boucher Y A, King A, He Z 2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC) p1-4
[12] Song Z Y, Yu D Y, Cai X H 2019 Acta Phys. Sin. 68 118701（in Chinese） [宋张勇, 于得洋, 蔡晓红 2019 物理学报 68 118701]
[13] Wang W, Li C L, Wu J H, Li X L 2019 Atomic Energy Sci. Tech. 53 2471（in Chinese） [王薇, 李传龙, 吴建华, 李兴隆 2019 原子能科学技术 53 2471]
[14] Zhangyong S, ZHANG B, Deyang Y 2021 Nucl. Phys. Rev. 38 215
[15] Shy D, He Z 2020 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 954 161443
[16] Xiaofeng G, Qingpei X, Dongfeng T, Yi W, Fanhua H, Yingzeng Z, Chengsheng C, Na L 2017 Appl. Radiat. Isot. 124 93
[17] Liu Y L, Fu J Q, Li Y L, Li Y J, Ma X M, Zhang L 2018 Nucl. Sci. Tech. 29 1
[18] Zhang F, Yan B, Wang X C, Jiang H, Wei X 2013 Acta Phys. Sin. 62 168702（in Chinese） [张峰, 闫镔, 汪先超, 江桦, 魏星 2013 物理学报 62 168702]
[19] Collaboration G, Agostinelli S 2003 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 506 0
[20] Tian F, Geng C, Yao Z, Wu R, Xu J, Cai F, Tang X 2022 Phys. Med. 96 140
[21] Xu D, He Z, Lehner C E, Zhang F Hard X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Detector Physics VI p144-155
Metrics
- Abstract views: 53
- PDF Downloads: 1
下载:
