-
Ultrasound-assisted transdermal drug delivery (UTDD) is a promising noninvasive strategy to overcome the skin barrier, yet conventional fixed-focus ultrasound approaches suffer from limited penetration depth, localized accumulation, and risk of thermal damage. To address these challenges, we propose a phased-array based dynamic focusing strategy, in which the acoustic focus is shifted sequentially along the depth direction. This approach aims to construct a continuous longitudinal acoustic radiation pathway that can sustain particle migration into deeper skin layers.
In vivo experiments were conducted with FITC-labeled nanoparticles on rat dorsal skin under three conditions: natural permeation, fixed focus (~0.5 mm beneath the skin), and dynamic focusing (scanned from the surface to 1 mm). After 10 minutes of ultrasound, fluorescence microscopy revealed that fixed focus enhanced penetration compared with natural permeation, while dynamic focusing further improved delivery, increasing average depth by 65.7%, maximum depth by 41.2%, and fluorescence intensity by 69.3% (Fig.1). Dynamic focusing also produced a more uniform and continuous deposition band, unlike the localized accumulation seen with fixed focus.
To elucidate the underlying mechanisms, a two-dimensional finite element model was established in COMSOL Multiphysics. Simulation results (Fig.2) revealed that, this “multi-focus relay” effect provided a continuous driving force pathway, enabling particles to follow the shifting focal positions. Trajectory analysis confirmed that the number of particles reaching deeper layers (up to 5 mm) increased by nearly 14 times under dynamic focusing compared with fixed focus, while the lateral distribution width expanded by 46.1%.
In conclusion, both experimental and simulation results demonstrate that phasedarray dynamic focusing significantly enhances penetration depth, migration efficiency, and distribution uniformity of nanoparticles in UTDD. By constructing a continuous acoustic radiation pathway in the depth dimension, this approach improves delivery efficiency while mitigating local energy accumulation, providing a safer and more effective strategy for ultrasound-mediated transdermal therapy.-
Keywords:
- ultrasound transdermal drug delivery /
- dynamic focusing /
- ultrasonic transducer array /
- finite element simulation
-
[1] Jeong W Y, Kwon M, Choi H E, Kim K S 2021 Biomater. Res. 25 24
[2] Gaikwad S S, Zanje A L, Somwanshi J D 2024 Int. J. Pharm. 652 123856
[3] Wiedersberg S, Guy R H 2014 J. Controlled Release 190 150
[4] Zhang H, Zhai Y J, Yang X Y, Zhai G X 2015 Curr. Pharm. Des. 12 2713
[5] Prausnitz M R, Langer R 2008 Nat. Biotechnol. 26 1261
[6] Polat B E, Deen W M, Langer R, Blankschtein D 2012 J. Controlled Release 158 250
[7] Yu C, Shah A, Amiri N, Marcus C, Nayeem M O G, Bhayadia A K, Karami A, Dagdeviren C 2023 Adv. Mater. 35 2300066
[8] Akhtar N, Singh V, Yusuf M, Khan R A 2020 Biomed. Eng.-Biomed. Tech. 65 243
[9] Smith N B 2008 Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 5 1107
[10] Tian Y H, Liu Z, Tan H Y, Hou J H, Wen X, Yang F, Cheng W 2020 Int. J. Nanomed. 15 401
[11] Sabbagh F, Muhamad I I, Niazmand R, Dikshit P K, Kim B S 2022 Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 203 222
[12] Al-Bataineh O M, Lweesy K, Fraiwan L 1st Middle East Conference on Biomedical Engineering Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, February 21-24, 2011 p316
[13] Maione E, Shung K K, Meyer R J, Hughes J W, Newnham R E, Smith N B 2002 IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelect. Freq. Contr. 49 1430
[14] Ding Y J, Qian S Y, Hu J W, Zou X 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 61 248 (in Chinese) [丁亚军, 钱盛友, 胡继文, 邹孝 2021 物理学报 61 248]
[15] Xu F, Lu M Z, Wan X M 2010 Acta Phys. Sin. 52 1349 (in Chinese) [徐丰, 陆明珠, 万明习 2010 物理学报 52 1349]
[16] Burgess A, Shah K, Hough O, Hynynen K 2015 Expert Rev. Neurother. 15 477
[17] Meng Y, Hynynen K, Lipsman N 2021 Nat. Rev. Neurol. 17 7
[18] Biskanaki F, Tertipi N, Sfyri E, Kefala V, Rallis E 2025 Appl. Sci. 15 4958
[19] Özsoy Ç, Lafci B, Reiss M, Deán-Ben X L, Razansky D 2023 Photoacoustics 31 100508
[20] Qian J, Xi W, Zhou X W, Tan J W, Wang Z B, Du Y H, Li Y H 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 281 (in Chinese) [钱骏, 谢伟, 周小伟, 谭坚文, 王智彪, 杜永洪, 李雁浩 2022 物理学报 71 281]
[21] Zhang H J, Pan Y P, Hou Y, Li M H, Deng J, Wang B C, Hao S L 2024 Small 20 2306944
[22] Caprifico A E, Polycarpou E, Foot P J S, Calabrese G 2020 Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 41 686
[23] Moreno V M, Baeza A, Vallet-Regí M 2021 Acta Biomater. 121 263
[24] Nguyen T T, Nguyen H N, Nghiem T H L, Do X H, To T T, Do T X P, Do D L, Nguyen H G, Nguyen H M, Nguyen N D, Luu M Q, Nguyen T N, Nguyen T B N, Nguyen V T, Pham V T, Than U T T, Hoang T M N 2024 Sci. Rep. 14 6969
[25] Do Nascimento V M, Nantes Button V L D S, Maia J M, Costa E T, Oliveira E J V 2003 Medical Imaging San Diego, CA, May 23, 2003 p86
[26] Husseini G A, Pitt W G 2008 Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 60 1137
[27] Paris J L, Mannaris C, Cabañas M V, Carlisle R, Manzano M, Vallet-Regí M, Coussios C C 2018 Chem. Eng. J. 340 2
[28] Gor'kov L. P. 1961 Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 140 88
[29] Sun F, Zeng Z M, Jin S J, Zhan X L 2011 Acta Phys. Sin. 60 435 (in Chinese) [孙芳, 曾周末, 王晓媛, 靳世久, 詹湘琳 2011 物理学报 60 435]
[30] Lintzeri D A, Karimian N, Blume‐Peytavi U, Kottner J 2022 J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 36 1191
Metrics
- Abstract views: 14
- PDF Downloads: 0
- Cited By: 0
下载:
