-
Ferroelectric random access memory (FeRAM) has been regarded as a promising technology for next-generation nonvolatile storage due to its excellent data storage performance and nonvolatile storage characteristics. However, fatigue degradation properties seriously impede the development and large-scale commercial use of FeRAM. In this paper, the interaction mechanism and enhancement of ferroelectric fatigue in lead zirconate titanate (PZT) thin film are investigated by the first-principles calculations (DFT). Theoretical calculations suggest that the coupling between oxygen vacancies and 180° domain walls in PZT is responsible for ferroelectric fatigue. Oxygen vacancies are more likely to be formed closer to domain wall, the “pinning” between oxygen vacancies and domain wall makes the migration of domain wall difficult, resulting in the suppression of polarization reversal and ultimately fatigue in ferroelectric thin film. The insertion of Ba(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3 (BMN) can absorb the oxygen vacancies in PZT and reduce the concentration of oxygen vacancies, and in doing so, the ferroelectric fatigue problem caused by the “pinning” effect of the oxygen vacancies can be eliminated. Moreover, the PZT thin films are deposited on Pt/Ti/SiO2/Si(100) by the sol-gel method with using BMN buffer layer. The remnant polarization (Pr
) of PZT film decreases by 51% and the PZT/BMN film remains 85% after 1010 cycles. Furthermore, it keeps stable even up to 1012 cycles. This paper demonstrates that the PZT/BMN film with excellent ferroelectric and fatigue endurance possesses the promising applications in FeRAM. -
Keywords:
- Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3 /
- 180° domain wall /
- oxygen vacancy /
- first-principles calculation
[1] Tsymbal E Y, Kohlstedt H 2006 Science 313 181
Google Scholar
[2] Boni A G, Chirila C, Pasuk I, Negrea R, Pintilie L, Pintilie L 2017 Phys. Rev. Appl. 8 034035
Google Scholar
[3] 陈俊东, 韩伟华, 杨冲, 赵晓松, 郭仰岩, 张晓迪, 杨富华 2020 物理学报 69 137701
Google Scholar
Chen J D, Han W H, Yang C, Zhao X S, Guo Y Y, Zhang X D, Yang F H 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 137701
Google Scholar
[4] 吕笑梅, 黄凤珍, 朱劲松 2020 物理学报 69 127704
Google Scholar
Lü X M, Huang F Z, Zhu J S 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 127704
Google Scholar
[5] Wang Z Q, Liu Y L, Shen J, Chen W, Miao J, Li A, L K, Zhou J 2020 Sci. China Mater. 63 2497
Google Scholar
[6] Deng C, He C, Chen Z, Chen H, Mao R, Liu Y, Zhu K, Gao H, Ding Y 2019 J. Appl. Phys. 126 085702
Google Scholar
[7] Wang Z Q, Chen B B, Shen J, Chen W, Liu Y L, Gong S K, Zhou J 2020 Chem. J. Chinese Universities 41 1908
Google Scholar
[8] Zhong H, Wen Y, Zhao Y, Zhang Q, Huang Q, Chen Y, Cai J, Zhang X, Li R, Bai L, Kang S, Yan S, Tian Y 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1805380
Google Scholar
[9] Jiang J, Bai Z L, Chen Z H, He L, Zhang D W, Zhang Q H, Shi J A, Park M H, Scott J F, Hwang C S, Jiang A Q 2018 Nature Mater. 17 2
Google Scholar
[10] Ma J, Ma J, Zhang Q, Peng R, Wang J, Liu C, Wang M, Li N, Chen M, Cheng X, Gao P, Gu L, Chen L, Yu P, Nan C 2018 Nature Nanotech. 13 947
Google Scholar
[11] Noguchi Y, Matsuo H, Kitanaka Y, Miyayama M 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 4225
Google Scholar
[12] Warren W L, Dimos D, Tuttle B A, Nasby R D, Pike G E 1994 Appl. Phys. Lett. 65 87185
Google Scholar
[13] Colla E L, Tagantsev A K, Taylor D V, Kholkin A L 2006 Integr. Ferroelectr. 341 3
Google Scholar
[14] Grossmann M, Lohse O, Bolten D, Waser R, Hartner W, Kastner M, Schindler G 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 76 363
Google Scholar
[15] Tagantsev A K, Stolichnov I, Colla E L, Setter N 2001 J. Appl. Phys. 90 1387
Google Scholar
[16] Scott J F, Dawber M 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 76 25
Google Scholar
[17] Jiang A Q, Lin Y Y, Tang T A 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 102 034102
Google Scholar
[18] Dawber M, Scott J F 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 76 1060
Google Scholar
[19] Stolichnov I, Tagantsev A, Colla E, Gentil S, Hiboux S, Baborowski J, Muralt P, Setter N 2000 J. Appl. Phys., 88 2154
Google Scholar
[20] Tagantsev A K, Stolichnov I A 1999 Appl. Phys. Lett. 74 1326
Google Scholar
[21] Du X, Chen I W 1998 J. Appl. Phys. 83 7789
Google Scholar
[22] Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169
Google Scholar
[23] Wu Z, Zhou J, Chen W, Shen J, Hu L, Lü C 2015 J. Sol-Gel Sci. Techn. 75 551
Google Scholar
[24] Placeres Jiménez R, Pedro Rino J, Marino Gonçalves A, Antonio Eiras J 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 112901
Google Scholar
[25] Hayashi M 1972 J. Phys. Soc. Japan 33 616
Google Scholar
[26] Landauer R 1957 J. Appl. Phys. 28 227
Google Scholar
[27] Zhi Y, Liu D, Sun J, Yan A, Zhou Y, Dai E, Liu L, Qu W 2009 J. Appl. Phys. 105 024106
Google Scholar
[28] Shin Y H, Grinberg I, Chen I W, Rappe A M 2007 Nature 449 881
Google Scholar
[29] Gopalan V, Mitchell T E 1998 J. Appl. Phys. 83 941
Google Scholar
[30] Kresse G, Joubert D 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1758
Google Scholar
[31] Perdew J P, Ruzsinszky A, Csonka G I, Vydrov O A, Scuseria G E, Zhou X, Burke K 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 136406
Google Scholar
[32] Dudarev S L, Botton G A, Savrasov S Y, Humphreys C J, Sutton A P 1998 Phys. Rev. B 57 1505
Google Scholar
[33] Lim T L, Nazarov M, Yoon T L, Low L C, Fauzi M N 2014 Phys. Scripta 89 095102
Google Scholar
[34] Okamoto S, Millis A J, Spaldin N A 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 056802
Google Scholar
[35] Mizokawa T, Fujimori A 1995 Phys. Rev. B 51 18
Google Scholar
[36] Meyer B, Vanderbilt D 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 104111
Google Scholar
[37] Yang Q, Cao J X, Zhou Y C, Zhang Y, Ma Y, Lou X J 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 141101
Google Scholar
[38] Cohen R E 1992 Nature 358 136
Google Scholar
[39] Cohen R E, Krakauer H 1992 Ferroelectrics 136 1
Google Scholar
-
图 1 包含8个钙钛矿单胞的超晶胞结构
Figure 1. Supercell structure containing 8 unit cells.
图 2 NEB方法计算畴壁迁移中的初始态和终止态
Figure 2. NEB method to calculate initial state and ending state in domain wall migration.
图 3 (a) PZT/BMN薄膜的结构示意图; (b) PZT, (c) BMN和(d) PZT/BMN薄膜的XRD图谱
Figure 3. (a) Schematic of PZT/BMN films; XRD patterns of (b) PZT, (c) BMN, and (d) PZT BMN films.
图 4 (a)无BMN缓冲层和(b)有BMN缓冲层的PZT薄膜表面; (c)无BMN缓冲层和(d)有BMN缓冲层的薄膜断面FESEM图像
Figure 4. FESEM images of the surface PZT films (a) without or (b) with BMN buffer layer; cross-section of films (c) without or (d) with BMN buffer layer.
图 5 PZT薄膜和PZT/BMN薄膜的 (a)电滞回线和(b)疲劳性能
Figure 5. (a) Hysteresis loop and (b) fatigue failure of PZT and PZT/BMN films.
图 6 四方相的PZT (a)晶体结构; (b)能带结构图和PDOS图
Figure 6. (a) Crystal structures; (b) band structure and PDOS of tetragonal PZT.
图 7 PZT畴壁运动过程中的能量变化图
Figure 7. Diagram of energy changes during PZT domain wall motion.
图 8 PZT中不同类型氧空位的能量随畴壁与氧空位之间的距离变化图
Figure 8. The energy variations of different types of oxygen vacancies in PZT with the distance between the domain wall and the oxygen vacancies.
图 9 氧空位下PZT中畴壁迁移过程中的能量变化图
Figure 9. Energy change diagram during the migration of domain walls in PZT with oxygen vacancies.
图 10 氧空位在PZT/BMN界面迁移过程中的能量变化图
Figure 10. Energy change diagram of oxygen vacancies during the migration process at PZT/BMN interface.
图 11 体系耐疲劳性增强的机理图 (a), (c)引入BMN 缓冲层前后的体系初始状态; (b), (d) 引入BMN缓冲层前后的体系发生严重疲劳后的状态 (图中圆点表示氧空位)
Figure 11. The mechanism diagram of system fatigue resistance enhancement: (a), (c) The initial state of the system before and after the introduction of the BMN buffer layer; (b), (d) the state of the system before and after the introduction of the BMN buffer layer after severe fatigue (The dots in the figure indicate oxygen vacancies).
表 1 具有不同PZT单胞数目的体系的畴壁能
Table 1. Domain wall energy of systems with different numbers of PZT unit cells.
n 2 4 6 8 10 ${E_{ {\rm{DW} } } }/({\rm{mJ} } \cdot { {\rm{m} }^{ - 2} })$ 108.5 114.9 116.0 111.4 109.6 注: 其中 n 表示超晶胞中单胞的数量. 
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] Tsymbal E Y, Kohlstedt H 2006 Science 313 181
Google Scholar
[2] Boni A G, Chirila C, Pasuk I, Negrea R, Pintilie L, Pintilie L 2017 Phys. Rev. Appl. 8 034035
Google Scholar
[3] 陈俊东, 韩伟华, 杨冲, 赵晓松, 郭仰岩, 张晓迪, 杨富华 2020 物理学报 69 137701
Google Scholar
Chen J D, Han W H, Yang C, Zhao X S, Guo Y Y, Zhang X D, Yang F H 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 137701
Google Scholar
[4] 吕笑梅, 黄凤珍, 朱劲松 2020 物理学报 69 127704
Google Scholar
Lü X M, Huang F Z, Zhu J S 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 127704
Google Scholar
[5] Wang Z Q, Liu Y L, Shen J, Chen W, Miao J, Li A, L K, Zhou J 2020 Sci. China Mater. 63 2497
Google Scholar
[6] Deng C, He C, Chen Z, Chen H, Mao R, Liu Y, Zhu K, Gao H, Ding Y 2019 J. Appl. Phys. 126 085702
Google Scholar
[7] Wang Z Q, Chen B B, Shen J, Chen W, Liu Y L, Gong S K, Zhou J 2020 Chem. J. Chinese Universities 41 1908
Google Scholar
[8] Zhong H, Wen Y, Zhao Y, Zhang Q, Huang Q, Chen Y, Cai J, Zhang X, Li R, Bai L, Kang S, Yan S, Tian Y 2019 Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1805380
Google Scholar
[9] Jiang J, Bai Z L, Chen Z H, He L, Zhang D W, Zhang Q H, Shi J A, Park M H, Scott J F, Hwang C S, Jiang A Q 2018 Nature Mater. 17 2
Google Scholar
[10] Ma J, Ma J, Zhang Q, Peng R, Wang J, Liu C, Wang M, Li N, Chen M, Cheng X, Gao P, Gu L, Chen L, Yu P, Nan C 2018 Nature Nanotech. 13 947
Google Scholar
[11] Noguchi Y, Matsuo H, Kitanaka Y, Miyayama M 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 4225
Google Scholar
[12] Warren W L, Dimos D, Tuttle B A, Nasby R D, Pike G E 1994 Appl. Phys. Lett. 65 87185
Google Scholar
[13] Colla E L, Tagantsev A K, Taylor D V, Kholkin A L 2006 Integr. Ferroelectr. 341 3
Google Scholar
[14] Grossmann M, Lohse O, Bolten D, Waser R, Hartner W, Kastner M, Schindler G 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 76 363
Google Scholar
[15] Tagantsev A K, Stolichnov I, Colla E L, Setter N 2001 J. Appl. Phys. 90 1387
Google Scholar
[16] Scott J F, Dawber M 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 76 25
Google Scholar
[17] Jiang A Q, Lin Y Y, Tang T A 2007 J. Appl. Phys. 102 034102
Google Scholar
[18] Dawber M, Scott J F 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 76 1060
Google Scholar
[19] Stolichnov I, Tagantsev A, Colla E, Gentil S, Hiboux S, Baborowski J, Muralt P, Setter N 2000 J. Appl. Phys., 88 2154
Google Scholar
[20] Tagantsev A K, Stolichnov I A 1999 Appl. Phys. Lett. 74 1326
Google Scholar
[21] Du X, Chen I W 1998 J. Appl. Phys. 83 7789
Google Scholar
[22] Kresse G, Furthmüller J 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 11169
Google Scholar
[23] Wu Z, Zhou J, Chen W, Shen J, Hu L, Lü C 2015 J. Sol-Gel Sci. Techn. 75 551
Google Scholar
[24] Placeres Jiménez R, Pedro Rino J, Marino Gonçalves A, Antonio Eiras J 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 112901
Google Scholar
[25] Hayashi M 1972 J. Phys. Soc. Japan 33 616
Google Scholar
[26] Landauer R 1957 J. Appl. Phys. 28 227
Google Scholar
[27] Zhi Y, Liu D, Sun J, Yan A, Zhou Y, Dai E, Liu L, Qu W 2009 J. Appl. Phys. 105 024106
Google Scholar
[28] Shin Y H, Grinberg I, Chen I W, Rappe A M 2007 Nature 449 881
Google Scholar
[29] Gopalan V, Mitchell T E 1998 J. Appl. Phys. 83 941
Google Scholar
[30] Kresse G, Joubert D 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1758
Google Scholar
[31] Perdew J P, Ruzsinszky A, Csonka G I, Vydrov O A, Scuseria G E, Zhou X, Burke K 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 136406
Google Scholar
[32] Dudarev S L, Botton G A, Savrasov S Y, Humphreys C J, Sutton A P 1998 Phys. Rev. B 57 1505
Google Scholar
[33] Lim T L, Nazarov M, Yoon T L, Low L C, Fauzi M N 2014 Phys. Scripta 89 095102
Google Scholar
[34] Okamoto S, Millis A J, Spaldin N A 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 056802
Google Scholar
[35] Mizokawa T, Fujimori A 1995 Phys. Rev. B 51 18
Google Scholar
[36] Meyer B, Vanderbilt D 2002 Phys. Rev. B 65 104111
Google Scholar
[37] Yang Q, Cao J X, Zhou Y C, Zhang Y, Ma Y, Lou X J 2013 Appl. Phys. Lett. 103 141101
Google Scholar
[38] Cohen R E 1992 Nature 358 136
Google Scholar
[39] Cohen R E, Krakauer H 1992 Ferroelectrics 136 1
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 4478
- PDF Downloads: 146
- Cited By: 0
