Laser-driven radiation-reaction effect and polarized particle acceleration

Ji Liang-Liang; Geng Xue-Song; Wu Yi-Tong; Shen Bai-Fei; Li Ru-Xin

doi:10.7498/aps.70.20210091

Abstract

Laser-plasma interaction at intensities beyond 10²² W/cm² enters a new regime where gamma-photon emission and the induced radiation-reaction effect dominate. In extreme laser fields, high energy electrons emit gamma-photons efficiently, which take considerable portion of energy away and impose strong reaction forces on radiating electrons. When the radiation power is comparable to the electron energy gained in a certain period of time, the radiation-reaction (RR) effect becomes significant, which fundamentally changes the picture of laser-plasma interaction. In this review article, we introduce the physics of radiation-reaction force, including both classical description and quantum description. The effects of stochastic emission and particle spins in the quantum-electrodynamics (QED) RR process are discussed. We summarize the RR-induced phenomena in laser-plasma interaction and some proposed measurements of RR. As a supplement, we also introduce the latest progress of producing spin polarized particles based on laser-plasma accelerations, which provides polarized beam sources for verifying the QED-RR effects.In the classical picture, the RR force can be described by the Landau-Lifshitz (LL) equation, which eliminates the non-physical run-away solution from the Lorentz-Abraham-Dirac (LAD) equation. The damping force could induce the electron trajectories to instantaneously reverse, electrons to cool and even high energy electrons to be reflected by laser pulses. The latter leads to a “potential barrier” at a certain threshold that prevents the electrons of arbitrarily high energy from penetrating the laser field. In general, classical LL equation overestimates the RR effect, thus calling for more accurate quantum description.When the emitted photon energy is close to the electron energy, radiation becomes discrete. Quantum effects arise such that the process, also known as nonlinear multi-photon Compton Scattering, must be considered in the strong-field QED picture. This is resolved in the Furry picture by using the laser-dressed Volkov state in the local constant cross-field approximation (LCFA). The QED model is applied to particle dynamics via Monte-Carlo (MC) sampling. We introduce the prominent feature of quantum RR-stochastic photon emission. It allows the processes forbidden in classical picture to emerge, such as quantum ‘quenching’, quantum ‘reflection’, etc. These observables validate the strong-field QED theory. Recently, there has been a rising interest in identifying the spin effect in the QED-RR force. We summarize the latest progress of this topic, showing that when spins are coupled with photon emission the electrons of different spin states undergo distinctive RR force. The RR force has a significant effect on laser-plasma interaction. The review paper introduces recent QED-MC based PIC simulation results. Some key features include electron cooling in laser-driven radiation pressure acceleration and the radiation-reaction trapping (RRT) mechanism. In the RRT regime the laser pulse conveys over 10% of its energy to gamma-photons, facilitating the creation of a highly efficient gamma-ray source and electron-positron pair. In addition, the paper mentions the major efforts to measure the RR effect in recent years. It relies on high energy electrons either colliding with ultra-intense laser pulses or traversing crystals. Primitive observations indicate that existing theories do not match experimental results. Further investigation is required in both SF-QED theory and experiment.Finally, the review paper discusses the idea of laser-driven polarized particle acceleration as a supplement. The all-optical approach integrates pre-polarized gas target into laser wakefield acceleration, offering a compact all-optical polarized particle source, which is highly favorable for strong-field QED studies, high-energy colliders and material science.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

1.
State Key Laboratory of High Field Laser Physics, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
2.
Mathematics & Science College, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
3.
School of Physical Science and Technology, Shanghai Tech University, Shanghai 201210, China

Corresponding author: Ji Liang-Liang, jill@siom.ac.cn

Funds: Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11875307, 11935008) and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, China (Grant No. XDB 16010000)

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Strickland D, Mourou G 1985 Opt. Commun. 55 447 Google Scholar
[2]	Mulser P, Bauer D 2010 High Power Laser-Matter Interaction (Berlin: Springer)
[3]	Vshivkov V, Naumova N, Pegoraro F, Bulanov S 1998 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 410 493 Google Scholar
[4]	Vshivkov V, Naumova N, Pegoraro F, Bulanov S 1998 Phys. Plasmas 5 2727 Google Scholar
[5]	Shen B, Meyer-ter-Vehn J 2001 Phys. Rev. E 65 01640
[6]	Cherepenin V A, Kulagin V V 2004 Phys. Lett. A 321 103 Google Scholar
[7]	Tajima T, Dawson J M 1979 Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 267 Google Scholar
[8]	Snavely R A, Key M H, Hatchett S P, et al. 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett 85 2945 Google Scholar
[9]	Németh K, Shen B, Li Y, et al. 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett 100 095002 Google Scholar
[10]	Albert F, Anderson S G, Gibson D J, et al. 2010 Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 13 070704 Google Scholar
[11]	Liao G, Liu H, Scott G, et al. 2020 Phys. Rev. X 10 031062
[12]	Kodama R, Norreys P A, Mima K, et al. 2001 Nature 412 798 Google Scholar
[13]	Zhong J, Li Y, Wang X, et al. 2010 Nat. Phys 6 984 Google Scholar
[14]	Chen H, Meyerhofer D D, Wilks S C, et al. 2011 High Energy Density Phys 7 225 Google Scholar
[15]	Xu T, Shen B, Xu J, et al. 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 033109 Google Scholar
[16]	Ritus V I 1985 J. Russian Laser Res. 6 497 Google Scholar
[17]	Baier V N, Katkov V M 1967 Phys. Lett. A 25 492 Google Scholar
[18]	Fedotov A M, Narozhny N B, Mourou G, Korn G 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 080402 Google Scholar
[19]	Elkina N V, Fedotov A M, Kostyukov I, et al. 2011 Phys. Rev. Special Topics-Accel. and Beams 14 054401 Google Scholar
[20]	Li J, Chen Y, Hatsagortsyan K Z, Keitel C H 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 11556 Google Scholar
[21]	Geng X S, Ji L L, Shen B F, et al. 2019 Commun. Phys 2 66 Google Scholar
[22]	Wu Y, Ji L, Geng X, et al. 2019 New J. Phys 21 073052 Google Scholar
[23]	Wen M, Tamburini M, Keitel C H 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 214801 Google Scholar
[24]	Büscher M, Hützen A, Ji L, Lehrach A 2020 High Power Laser Science and Engineering 8 e35 Google Scholar
[25]	Koga J, Esirkepov T, Bulanov S V 2005 Phys. Plasmas 12 093106 Google Scholar
[26]	Landau L D, Lifshitz E M 1971The Classical Theory of Fields (Oxford: Pergamon Press)
[27]	Vranic M, Grismayer T, Fonseca R A, Silva L O 2016 Journal of Physics 18 073035
[28]	Harvey C N, Gonoskov A, Ilderton A, Marklund M 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 105004 Google Scholar
[29]	Sorbo D D, Seipt D, Thomas A G R, Ridgers C P 2018 Plasma Phys. and Control. Fusion 60 064003 Google Scholar
[30]	Seipt D, Sorbo D D, Ridgers C P, Thomas A G R, 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 023417 Google Scholar
[31]	Geng X S, Ji L L, Shen B F, et al. 2020 New J. Phys 22 013007 Google Scholar
[32]	Dirac P A M 1938 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 167 148 Google Scholar
[33]	Piazza A D 2008 Lett. Math. Phys. 83 30
[34]	Piazza A D, Hatsagortsyan K Z, Keitel C H 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 254802 Google Scholar
[35]	Baier V N, Katkov V M, Strakhovenko V M 1991 Rad. Eff. 527 122
[36]	Ridgers C P, Blackburn T G, Sorbo D D, et al. 2017 J. Phys. Plasmas 83 715830502 Google Scholar
[37]	Berestetskii V B, Lifshitz E M, Pitaevskii L P 1982 Quantum Electrodynamics (Amsterdam: Elsevier)
[38]	Wolkow D M 1936 Z. Physik 94 250
[39]	Furry W H 1951 Phys. Rev. 81 115 Google Scholar
[40]	Piazza A D, Tamburini M, Meuren S, Keitel C H 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 022125 Google Scholar
[41]	Pausch R 2012 Diploma Thesis (Dresden: Technische Universität Dresden)
[42]	Nikishov A, Ritus V 1964 Sov. Phys. Jetp-Ussr 19 529
[43]	Gonoskov A, Bastrakov S, Efimenko E, et al. 2015 Phys. Rev. E 92 023305 Google Scholar
[44]	Duclous R, Kirk J G, Bell A R 2010 Plasma Phys. and Control. Fusion 53 015009
[45]	Blackburn T G, Seipt D, Bulanov S S, Marklund M 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 083108 Google Scholar
[46]	Neitz N, Piazza A D 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 054802 Google Scholar
[47]	Wen M, Keitel C H, Bauke H 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 042102 Google Scholar
[48]	Bargmann V, Michel L, Telegdi V L 1959 Phys. Rev. Lett. 2 435 Google Scholar
[49]	Jackson J D 1998 Classical Electrodynamics (3rd Ed.) (New York: Wiley)
[50]	Ternov I M 1995 Phys.-Usp. 38 409 Google Scholar
[51]	Mane S R, Shatunov Y M, Yokoya K 2005 Rep. Prog. Phys. 68 1997 Google Scholar
[52]	Sorbo D D, Seipt D, Blackburn T G, et al. 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 043407 Google Scholar
[53]	Li Y, Shaisultanov R, Hatsagortsyan K Z, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett 122 154801 Google Scholar
[54]	Seipt D, Sorbo D D, Ridgers C P, Thomas A G R 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 061402 Google Scholar
[55]	Geng X S, Bu Z G, Wu Y T, et al. 2020 ArXiv: 1912.03625 [Physics]
[56]	Guo R T, Wang Y, Shaisultanov R, et al. 2020 Phys. Rev. Res 2 033483 Google Scholar
[57]	Esirkepov T, Borghesi M, Bulanov S V, Mourou G, Tajima T 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 175003 Google Scholar
[58]	Klimo O, Psikal J, Limpouch J, Tikhonchuk V T 2008 Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 11 031301 Google Scholar
[59]	Robinson A P L, Zepf M, Kar S, Evans R G, Bellei C 2008 New J. Phys. 10 013021 Google Scholar
[60]	Yan X Q, Lin C, Sheng Z M, et al. 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett 100 135003 Google Scholar
[61]	Qiao B, Zepf M, Borghesi M, Geissler M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 145002 Google Scholar
[62]	Shen B, Xu Z 2001 Phys. Rev. E 64 056406 Google Scholar
[63]	Zhang X, Shen B, Li X, et al. 2007 Phys. Plasmas 14 123108 Google Scholar
[64]	Chen M, Pukhov A, Yu T P, Sheng Z M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 024801 Google Scholar
[65]	Yu T P, Pukhov A, Shvets G, Chen M 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 065002 Google Scholar
[66]	Yan X Q, Wu H C, Sheng Z M, Chen J E, Meyer-ter-Vehn J 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 135001 Google Scholar
[67]	M Tamburini, F Pegoraro, Piazza A D, Keitel C H, Macchi A 2010 New J. Phys. 12 123005 Google Scholar
[68]	Chen M, Pukhov A, Yu T P, Sheng Z M 2010 Plasma Phys. and Control. Fusion 53 014004
[69]	Tamburini M, Pegoraro F, Piazza A D, Keitel C H, Liseykina T V, Macchi A 2011 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 653 181 Google Scholar
[70]	Duff M J, Capdessus R, Sorbo D D, Ridgers C P, King M, McKenna P 2018 Plasma Phys. and Control. Fusion 60 064006 Google Scholar
[71]	Ji L L, Pukhov A, Kostyukov I, Shen B F, Akli K 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 145003 Google Scholar
[72]	Gonoskov A, Bashinov A, Gonoskov I, et al. 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett 113 014801 Google Scholar
[73]	Lehmann G, Spatschek K H 2012 Phys. Rev. E 85 056412 Google Scholar
[74]	Gong Z, Hu R, Shou Y, Qiao B, et al. 2016 Matter and Radiat. Extremes 1 308 Google Scholar
[75]	Gonoskov A, Marklund M 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 093109 Google Scholar
[76]	Bulanov S V, Esirkepov T Z, Kando M, Koga J K, Bulanov S S 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 056605 Google Scholar
[77]	Guo Z, Ji L, Yu Q, et al. 2019 Plasma Phys. and Control. Fusion 61 065007 Google Scholar
[78]	Piazza A D, Hatsagortsyan K Z, Keitel C H 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 220403 Google Scholar
[79]	Liu C, Shen B, Zhang X, et al. 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 023107 Google Scholar
[80]	Gong Z, Mackenroth F, Yan X Q, Arefiev A V 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 1
[81]	Ji L L, Pukhov A, Nerush E N, et al. 2014 Eur. Phys. J. ST 223 1069 Google Scholar
[82]	Ji L L, Pukhov A, Nerush E N, et al. 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 023109 Google Scholar
[83]	Zhu X L, Yu T P, Sheng Z M, Yin Y, Turcu I C E, Pukhov A 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 1
[84]	Cole J M, Behm K T, Gerstmayr E, et al. 2018 Phys. Rev. X 8 011020
[85]	Poder K, Tamburini M, Sarri G, et al. 2018 Phys. Rev. X 8 031004
[86]	Blackburn T G, Ridgers C P, Kirk J G, Bell A R 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 015001 Google Scholar
[87]	Vranic M, Martins J L, Vieira J, Fonseca R A, Silva L O 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 134801 Google Scholar
[88]	Wistisen T N, Piazza A D, Knudsen H V, Uggerhøj U I 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 1 Google Scholar
[89]	Ji L L, Snyder J, Shen B F 2019 Plasma Phys. and Control. Fusion 61 065019 Google Scholar
[90]	Snyder J, Ji L L, George K M, et al. 2019 Phys. Plasmas 26 033110 Google Scholar
[91]	Mironov A A, Meuren S, Fedotov A M 2020 Phys. Rev. D 102 053005 Google Scholar
[92]	Ilderton A, King B, Seipt D 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 042121 Google Scholar
[93]	Gay T J. 2009 Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 57 157
[94]	Jefferson Lab Qweak, 2018 Nature 557 207 Google Scholar
[95]	Schlimme B S, et al. 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett 111 132504 Google Scholar
[96]	Ageev E S, et al. 2005 Phys. Lett. B 612 154 Google Scholar
[97]	Salajegheh M, Mohammad S, Khanpour H, Atashbar T S 2018 Phys. Rev. C 97 055201 Google Scholar
[98]	Huang H, Kewisch J, Liu C, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett 122 204803 Google Scholar
[99]	X J Wang, H Sun, X Luo 2017 Advances in High Energy Phys. 2017 1
[100]	Burkardt M, Miller C A, Nowak W D 2010 Rep. Prog. Phys. 73 016201 Google Scholar
[101]	Sokolov A A, Ternov I M 1964 Sov. Phys. Dokl. 8 1203
[102]	Rathmann F, Saleev A, Nikolaev N N 2014 Phys. Part. Nucl. 45 229 Google Scholar
[103]	Pierce D T, Meier F, Zürcher P 1975 Appl. Phys. Lett. 26 670 Google Scholar
[104]	Batelaan H, Green A S, Hitt B A, Gay T J 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 4216 Google Scholar
[105]	Hützen A, Thomas J, Böker J, et al. 2019 High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 7 e16 Google Scholar
[106]	Alekseev I, Allgower C, Bai M, et al. 2003 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 499 392 Google Scholar
[107]	Wu Y, Ji L, Geng X, et al. 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl 13 044064 Google Scholar
[108]	Wu Y, Ji L, Geng X, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. E 100 043202 Google Scholar
[109]	Hartung A, Morales F, Kunitski M, et al. 2016 Nat. Photon 10 526 Google Scholar
[110]	Trabert D, Hartung A, Eckart S, et al. 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett 120 043202 Google Scholar
[111]	Barth I, Smirnova O 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 013401 Google Scholar
[112]	Rakitzis T P, Samartzis P C, Toomes R L, et al. 2003 Science 300 1936 Google Scholar
[113]	Rakitzis T P 2004 Chem. Phys. Chem. 5 1489 Google Scholar
[114]	Sofikitis D, Kannis C S, Boulogiannis G K, Rakitzis T P 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 083001 Google Scholar
[115]	Sofikitis D, Rubio-Lago L, Bougas L, Alexander A J, Rakitzis T P 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 129 144302 Google Scholar
[116]	Thomas J, Hützen A, Lehrach A, et al. 2020 Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 23 064401 Google Scholar
[117]	Vieira J, Huang C K, Mori W B, Silva L O 2011 Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 14 071303 Google Scholar
[118]	Golovanov A A, Kostyukov I Y, Thomas J, Pukhov 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 103104 Google Scholar
[119]	Lu W, Huang C, Zhou M, Mori W B, Katsouleas T 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 165002 Google Scholar
[120]	Gonsalves A J, Nakamura K, Lin C, et al. 2011 Nat. Phys 7 862 Google Scholar
[121]	Schmid K, Buck A, Sears C M S, et al. 2010 Phys. Rev. Special Topics-Accel. Beams 13 091301 Google Scholar
[122]	Zou J P, Blanc C L, Papadopoulos D, et al. 2015 High Power Laser Sci. Eng 3 e2 Google Scholar
[123]	Zamfir N V 2014 Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 223 1221 Google Scholar
[124]	Li W, Gan Z, Yu L, et al. 2018 Opt. Lett 43 5681 Google Scholar
[125]	Gomez C H, Blake S P, Chekhlov O, et al. 2010 IOP Publishing 244 032006
[126]	Jin L, Wen M, Zhang X, et al. 2020 Phys. Rev. E 102 011201 Google Scholar
[127]	Hützen A, Thomas J, Lehrach A, et al. 2020 J. Phys.: Conf. Series 1596 012013 Google Scholar
[128]	Makdisi Y 1998 AIP Conf. Proc. 451 40
[129]	Roser T (Edited by A Chao and M Tigner) 2002 Handbook of Accelerator Physics and Engineering (Singapore: World Scientific)

Cited By

图 1 在激光、电子对撞情况下, 激光强度(波长为800 nm)和电子能量对应的非线性量子参数$ {\chi }_{\mathrm{e}} $和辐射反作用效应参数$ R $

Figure 1. The nonlinear quantum parameter $ {\chi }_{\mathrm{e}} $ and radiation-reaction effect parameter $ R $ as a function of the laser intensity (at wavelength of 800 nm) and electron energy in the case of laser and electron collision.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 电子与激光对撞在方位角$ \phi ={180}^{\circ } $处的角度能谱　(a) 无辐射反作用; (b) 有辐射反作用. 激光强度为$ 5\times {10}^{22}\;\mathrm{W}\cdot \mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2} $, 电子能量为40 MeV

Figure 2. Angle energy spectrum for electron and laser colliding at azimuth angle $ \phi ={180}^{\circ } $: (a) Without radiation reaction; (b) with radiation reaction. The laser intensity is $ 5\times {10}^{22}\;\mathrm{W}\cdot \mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2} $ and the electron energy is 40 MeV.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 不同电子能量$ {\gamma }_{0} $与不同场强$ {a}_{0} $的激光对撞后电子被反射的比例　(a)基于LL方程的试探粒子模拟结果, 白线为(5)式给出的边界; (b)考虑量子修正因子(6)式的结果

Figure 3. The ratio of electrons reflected after colliding with laser pulse at different electron energy $ {\gamma }_{0} $ and laser field amplitude $ {a}_{0} $: (a) From test particle simulations using the LL equation, the white line corresponds to the threshold defined in Eq. (5); (b) after considering the quantum correction factor according to Eq. (6).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 (a) $ {\gamma }_{0}=1000 $的电子和不同脉宽激光对撞后辐射的光子数量, $ \tau $为激光周期数, 直线为Monte-Carlo模拟的结果, 点为解析结果^[45]; (b)两种途径的光子数量相对误差^[45]; (c) 不同激光参数下能谱的对比, 其中$ f=\delta $, 灰色实线为QED结果, 虚线为Monte-Carlo结果. 垂直的虚线为第一阶非线性Compton的边界${f}_{\mathrm{C}}\approx 2\dfrac{{\chi }_{\mathrm{e}}}{{a}_{0}^{3}}$^[45]

Figure 4. (a) The number of photons emitted by electrons of $ {\gamma }_{0} $=1000 head-on colliding with a laser pulse with different pulse width (τ is the pulse duration in laser period). Lines are the result from Monte-Carlo simulations while points are from analytical result^[45]; (b) relative error of the photon number between the two approaches^[45]; (c) comparison of energy spectra under different laser parameters where $ f=\delta $. The solid gray line gives the QED result, and the dashed line is the Monte-Carlo result, respectively. The perpendicular dotted line is the boundary of the first order nonlinear Compton${f}_{\mathrm{C}}\approx 2\dfrac{{\chi }_{\mathrm{e}}}{{a}_{0}^{3}}$^[45].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 500 MeV电子与a₀ = 100激光场对撞的电子轨迹, 黑线为QED-MC方法计算20次给出的轨迹, 红线、蓝线分别为Lorentz方程、LL方程的轨迹

Figure 5. Trajectories of electrons with 500 MeV colliding with a₀ = 100 laser field. Black solid lines are the ones given by the QED-MC method (repeated 20 times at exactly the same condition). The red and blue solid lines are the trajectory from Lorentz equation and LL equation, respectively.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 电子束与(a)中的激光对撞后的能谱变化, 其中激光强度约为$ {a}_{0}=68 $, 电子中心能量约为1 GeV^[46]; (b) 量子随机辐射模型^[46]; (c) LL方程^[46]; (d) 量子修正的LL方程^[46]

Figure 6. The energy spectra after the electron beam collides with the laser in (a), where the laser intensity is about $ {a}_{0}=68 $ and the electron center energy is about 1 GeV; (b) quantum stochastic radiation model; (c) LL equation; (d) the quantum-modified LL equation^[46].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 7 半周期(左)、单周期(右)激光和电子对撞的空间轨迹(上)和能量变化趋势(下)^[28]

Figure 7. Trajectories (top) and energy evolution (bottom) of electrons in collision with half-cycle (left) and one-cycle (right) laser pulse^[28].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 8 (a)—(f) Lorentz方程、LL方程和QED光子辐射给出的两种电子能量下的运动轨迹, 其中红色箭头表示反常透射与反射的电子^[21]; (g)—(i) 不同激光强度和电子能量下电子被激光反射的比例, 红色和蓝色方块而分别为第二列和第一列所对应的参数^[21]

Figure 8. (a)–(f) Electron trajectories at two given values of kinetic energy, modelled by the Lorentz equation, the LL equation and the QED photon radiation. The red arrows represent anomalously transmitted and reflected electrons^[21]. (g)–(i) Proportion of electrons reflected by the laser pulse at different laser intensities and electron energies. The red and blue squares correspond to the parameters in the second and first columns, respectively^[21].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 9 电子束在存储环中极化率随时间的变化^[51]

Figure 9. Polarization evolution of an electron beam in a storage ring^[51].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 10 圆偏振驻波场中不同场强对应的电子极化率随时间的演化^[52]

Figure 10. Electron polarization evolution as a function of the laser amplitude in circularly polarized standing wave field^[52].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 11 极化电子在激光场中的振荡${\Delta }{p}_{x}$表示无自旋电子在半周期内由于辐射反作用产生的动量变化, $ \pm $表示相反的自旋极化方向^[31]

Figure 11. The oscillation of polarized electrons in laser field. ${\Delta }{p}_{x}$ represents the momentum shift of unpolarized electrons in a half cycle, plus or minus sign denote electron initially polarized parallel or anti-parallel to the laser magnetic field^[31].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 12 考虑与不考虑辐射反作用力的结果对比^[68]　(a)电子x-p_x分布; (b)质子x-p_x分布; (c)电子能谱; (d)质子能谱

Figure 12. Simulation results with and without radiation reaction^[68]: (a) x-p_x distribution of electrons; (b) x-p_x distribution of protons; (c) energy spectrum of electrons; (d) energy spectrum of protons^[68].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 13 $ {a}_{0}=500 $的激光和$ {n}_{\mathrm{e}}=20{n}_{\mathrm{c}} $的等离子相互作用, 在$ t=80{T}_{0} $时刻电子、质子、电磁场和$ \gamma $光子的分布^[71]　(a)—(c) 无辐射反作用; (d)—(g) 存在辐射反作用

Figure 13. The distribution of electrons, protons, electromagnetic fields, and gamma photons at t = 80T₀ when a laser of $ {a}_{0}=500 $ interacts with a plasma of $ {n}_{\mathrm{e}}=20{n}_{\mathrm{c}} $^[71]: (a)–(c) with radiation reaction; (d)–(g) without of radiation reaction.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 14 (a) 不同场强下电子在驻波场中的密度分布, 电子的辐射过程采用QED-MC模型^[72]; (b) 辐射模型为经典辐射^[72]; (c) 不同场强下典型的电子轨迹^[72]

Figure 14. (a) Density distribution of electrons in the standing wave field at different field intensities. Photon emission is modelled via QED-MC method^[72]; (b) the result from classical radiation-reaction model^[72]; (c) typical electron trajectories at different field intensities^[72].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 15 (a)有辐射反作用力情况下, 不同等离子体密度下电子的轨迹^[77]; (b)辐射反作用力所做的功^[77]; (c) 等离子体场的空间尺度、场强^[77]. 图例中Eq.(4)是等离子体场电势$ \phi ={E}_{x0}d/{\gamma }_{x} $

Figure 15. (a) Electron trajectories at different plasma densities^[77]; (b) work done by the radiation reaction force; (c) length scale and field strength of plasma field at different plasma densities^[77]. Eq. (4) is the electric potential of the plasma field $ \phi ={E}_{x0}d/{\gamma }_{x} $.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 16 能量为1 GeV的电子和$ 5\times {10}^{22}\;\mathrm{W}\cdot \mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2} $(${a}_{0}= $$ 154$)激光对撞产生的辐射谱^[78]. 黑线和红色虚线为量子辐射情况下有、无辐射反作用的辐射谱线; 蓝色虚线和红色点线是经典理论给出的有、无辐射反作用的辐射谱线

Figure 16. The radiation spectrum from the collision between 1 GeV electrons and $ 5\times {10}^{22}\;\mathrm{W}\cdot \mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-2} $($ {a}_{0}=154 $) laser pulse^[78]. The black and red dotted lines are the spectra with and without radiation reaction in quantum radiation. The blue dotted and red dotted lines are the ones given by classical theory, with and without radiation reaction.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 17 不同激光光强下,　(a) 激光到等离子体的总能量转换效率和 (b) 激光到伽马光子的能量转换效率^[82]

Figure 17. The total energy conversion efficiency of laser to plasma (a) and the energy conversion efficiency of laser to gamma photon (b) as a function of laser intensity^[82].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 18 全光探测辐射反作用效应示意图. 电子束经过尾场加速后, 与散射激光对撞产生高能光子^[87]

Figure 18. A sketch of all-light detection of radiation reaction. After the electron beam accelerates through the tail field, it collides with the scattering laser to produce high-energy photons^[87].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 19 (a)激光加速电子进入微通道靶后经过薄膜的反射与电子对撞^[89]; (b)电子能量的角分布^[89]

Figure 19. (a) The laser accelerates the electron into the microchannel target and then collides with the electron through the reflection of the film^[89]; (b) angular distribution of electron energy^[89].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 20 高能正电子束穿过晶体后测量光子能谱及其与不同模型计算结果对比^[88]　(a)靶厚为3.8 mm; (b)靶厚为10.0 mm, 其中QRRM为量子辐射模型, QnoRRM为量子无辐射模型, SCRRM为半经典辐射模型, CRRM为经典辐射模型

Figure 20. Measured photon energy spectra generated by high-energy positron beam penetrating crystal and its comparison with theoretical results from different models^[88]: (a) Target thickness of 3.8 mm; (b) target thickness of 10.0 mm. QRRM is the quantum RR model, QNorRM is the quantum model without RR, ScrRM is the semi-classical RR model, and CrRM is the classical RR model.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 21 电子以及卤化物极化率和激光波长的关系, 质子极化与电子一致^[113]

Figure 21. Polarization of electrons and the halide as a function of the ionization laser wavelength^[113].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 22 基于激光尾场的预极化电子加速的(a)实验设计和(b)相互作用流程^[22]

Figure 22. (a) Experimental design and (b) interaction processes for polarized electron acceleration based on laser-driven wakefield^[22].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 23 添加自旋模块后的PIC流程

Figure 23. PIC flow after adding spin module.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 24 激光尾场加速过程中电子束极化率随时间演化(a)及与激光强度的关系(b)^[23]

Figure 24. The electron beam polarization versus time (a) and laser amplitude (b) in laser wakefield acceleration^[23].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 25 LG涡旋光和高斯光作为驱动源时　(a)横向预极化和(b)纵向预极化尾场极化电子束峰值电流与极化率的关系^[22]

Figure 25. The electron beam polarization as a function of the peak current for wakefield acceleration driven by LG vortex and Gaussian laser for (a) transverse pre-polarized case and (b) longitudinal pre-polarized case^[22].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 26 激光尾场加速横向预极化电子时电子束极化率的横向相空间分布, 分别对应纵向s_x, 横向s_y与s_z, 初始自旋为s_z方向^[107]

Figure 26. The transverse phase space distribution of electron beam polarization in laser wakefield acceleration for transversely pre-polarized electrons(s_z direction). Left to right: longitudinal polarization s_x, transverse polarization s_y and s_z^[107].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 27 尾场加速横向预极化电子的(a)自旋过滤器示意图, (b)激光驱动和电子束驱动对比及(c)不同筛选角下极化率与归一化参数ψ的关系^[107]

Figure 27. (a) Sketch of the spin filter, (b) beam polarization in laser driven and electron beam driven scenarios, and (c) the relationship between the polarization and the normalized parameter ψ at different screening angles^[107].

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

[1]	Strickland D, Mourou G 1985 Opt. Commun. 55 447 Google Scholar
[2]	Mulser P, Bauer D 2010 High Power Laser-Matter Interaction (Berlin: Springer)
[3]	Vshivkov V, Naumova N, Pegoraro F, Bulanov S 1998 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 410 493 Google Scholar
[4]	Vshivkov V, Naumova N, Pegoraro F, Bulanov S 1998 Phys. Plasmas 5 2727 Google Scholar
[5]	Shen B, Meyer-ter-Vehn J 2001 Phys. Rev. E 65 01640
[6]	Cherepenin V A, Kulagin V V 2004 Phys. Lett. A 321 103 Google Scholar
[7]	Tajima T, Dawson J M 1979 Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 267 Google Scholar
[8]	Snavely R A, Key M H, Hatchett S P, et al. 2000 Phys. Rev. Lett 85 2945 Google Scholar
[9]	Németh K, Shen B, Li Y, et al. 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett 100 095002 Google Scholar
[10]	Albert F, Anderson S G, Gibson D J, et al. 2010 Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 13 070704 Google Scholar
[11]	Liao G, Liu H, Scott G, et al. 2020 Phys. Rev. X 10 031062
[12]	Kodama R, Norreys P A, Mima K, et al. 2001 Nature 412 798 Google Scholar
[13]	Zhong J, Li Y, Wang X, et al. 2010 Nat. Phys 6 984 Google Scholar
[14]	Chen H, Meyerhofer D D, Wilks S C, et al. 2011 High Energy Density Phys 7 225 Google Scholar
[15]	Xu T, Shen B, Xu J, et al. 2016 Phys. Plasmas 23 033109 Google Scholar
[16]	Ritus V I 1985 J. Russian Laser Res. 6 497 Google Scholar
[17]	Baier V N, Katkov V M 1967 Phys. Lett. A 25 492 Google Scholar
[18]	Fedotov A M, Narozhny N B, Mourou G, Korn G 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 080402 Google Scholar
[19]	Elkina N V, Fedotov A M, Kostyukov I, et al. 2011 Phys. Rev. Special Topics-Accel. and Beams 14 054401 Google Scholar
[20]	Li J, Chen Y, Hatsagortsyan K Z, Keitel C H 2017 Sci. Rep. 7 11556 Google Scholar
[21]	Geng X S, Ji L L, Shen B F, et al. 2019 Commun. Phys 2 66 Google Scholar
[22]	Wu Y, Ji L, Geng X, et al. 2019 New J. Phys 21 073052 Google Scholar
[23]	Wen M, Tamburini M, Keitel C H 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 214801 Google Scholar
[24]	Büscher M, Hützen A, Ji L, Lehrach A 2020 High Power Laser Science and Engineering 8 e35 Google Scholar
[25]	Koga J, Esirkepov T, Bulanov S V 2005 Phys. Plasmas 12 093106 Google Scholar
[26]	Landau L D, Lifshitz E M 1971The Classical Theory of Fields (Oxford: Pergamon Press)
[27]	Vranic M, Grismayer T, Fonseca R A, Silva L O 2016 Journal of Physics 18 073035
[28]	Harvey C N, Gonoskov A, Ilderton A, Marklund M 2017 Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 105004 Google Scholar
[29]	Sorbo D D, Seipt D, Thomas A G R, Ridgers C P 2018 Plasma Phys. and Control. Fusion 60 064003 Google Scholar
[30]	Seipt D, Sorbo D D, Ridgers C P, Thomas A G R, 2018 Phys. Rev. A 98 023417 Google Scholar
[31]	Geng X S, Ji L L, Shen B F, et al. 2020 New J. Phys 22 013007 Google Scholar
[32]	Dirac P A M 1938 Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 167 148 Google Scholar
[33]	Piazza A D 2008 Lett. Math. Phys. 83 30
[34]	Piazza A D, Hatsagortsyan K Z, Keitel C H 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 254802 Google Scholar
[35]	Baier V N, Katkov V M, Strakhovenko V M 1991 Rad. Eff. 527 122
[36]	Ridgers C P, Blackburn T G, Sorbo D D, et al. 2017 J. Phys. Plasmas 83 715830502 Google Scholar
[37]	Berestetskii V B, Lifshitz E M, Pitaevskii L P 1982 Quantum Electrodynamics (Amsterdam: Elsevier)
[38]	Wolkow D M 1936 Z. Physik 94 250
[39]	Furry W H 1951 Phys. Rev. 81 115 Google Scholar
[40]	Piazza A D, Tamburini M, Meuren S, Keitel C H 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 022125 Google Scholar
[41]	Pausch R 2012 Diploma Thesis (Dresden: Technische Universität Dresden)
[42]	Nikishov A, Ritus V 1964 Sov. Phys. Jetp-Ussr 19 529
[43]	Gonoskov A, Bastrakov S, Efimenko E, et al. 2015 Phys. Rev. E 92 023305 Google Scholar
[44]	Duclous R, Kirk J G, Bell A R 2010 Plasma Phys. and Control. Fusion 53 015009
[45]	Blackburn T G, Seipt D, Bulanov S S, Marklund M 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 083108 Google Scholar
[46]	Neitz N, Piazza A D 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 054802 Google Scholar
[47]	Wen M, Keitel C H, Bauke H 2017 Phys. Rev. A 95 042102 Google Scholar
[48]	Bargmann V, Michel L, Telegdi V L 1959 Phys. Rev. Lett. 2 435 Google Scholar
[49]	Jackson J D 1998 Classical Electrodynamics (3rd Ed.) (New York: Wiley)
[50]	Ternov I M 1995 Phys.-Usp. 38 409 Google Scholar
[51]	Mane S R, Shatunov Y M, Yokoya K 2005 Rep. Prog. Phys. 68 1997 Google Scholar
[52]	Sorbo D D, Seipt D, Blackburn T G, et al. 2017 Phys. Rev. A 96 043407 Google Scholar
[53]	Li Y, Shaisultanov R, Hatsagortsyan K Z, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett 122 154801 Google Scholar
[54]	Seipt D, Sorbo D D, Ridgers C P, Thomas A G R 2019 Phys. Rev. A 100 061402 Google Scholar
[55]	Geng X S, Bu Z G, Wu Y T, et al. 2020 ArXiv: 1912.03625 [Physics]
[56]	Guo R T, Wang Y, Shaisultanov R, et al. 2020 Phys. Rev. Res 2 033483 Google Scholar
[57]	Esirkepov T, Borghesi M, Bulanov S V, Mourou G, Tajima T 2004 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 175003 Google Scholar
[58]	Klimo O, Psikal J, Limpouch J, Tikhonchuk V T 2008 Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 11 031301 Google Scholar
[59]	Robinson A P L, Zepf M, Kar S, Evans R G, Bellei C 2008 New J. Phys. 10 013021 Google Scholar
[60]	Yan X Q, Lin C, Sheng Z M, et al. 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett 100 135003 Google Scholar
[61]	Qiao B, Zepf M, Borghesi M, Geissler M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 145002 Google Scholar
[62]	Shen B, Xu Z 2001 Phys. Rev. E 64 056406 Google Scholar
[63]	Zhang X, Shen B, Li X, et al. 2007 Phys. Plasmas 14 123108 Google Scholar
[64]	Chen M, Pukhov A, Yu T P, Sheng Z M 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 024801 Google Scholar
[65]	Yu T P, Pukhov A, Shvets G, Chen M 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 065002 Google Scholar
[66]	Yan X Q, Wu H C, Sheng Z M, Chen J E, Meyer-ter-Vehn J 2009 Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 135001 Google Scholar
[67]	M Tamburini, F Pegoraro, Piazza A D, Keitel C H, Macchi A 2010 New J. Phys. 12 123005 Google Scholar
[68]	Chen M, Pukhov A, Yu T P, Sheng Z M 2010 Plasma Phys. and Control. Fusion 53 014004
[69]	Tamburini M, Pegoraro F, Piazza A D, Keitel C H, Liseykina T V, Macchi A 2011 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 653 181 Google Scholar
[70]	Duff M J, Capdessus R, Sorbo D D, Ridgers C P, King M, McKenna P 2018 Plasma Phys. and Control. Fusion 60 064006 Google Scholar
[71]	Ji L L, Pukhov A, Kostyukov I, Shen B F, Akli K 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 145003 Google Scholar
[72]	Gonoskov A, Bashinov A, Gonoskov I, et al. 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett 113 014801 Google Scholar
[73]	Lehmann G, Spatschek K H 2012 Phys. Rev. E 85 056412 Google Scholar
[74]	Gong Z, Hu R, Shou Y, Qiao B, et al. 2016 Matter and Radiat. Extremes 1 308 Google Scholar
[75]	Gonoskov A, Marklund M 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 093109 Google Scholar
[76]	Bulanov S V, Esirkepov T Z, Kando M, Koga J K, Bulanov S S 2011 Phys. Rev. E 84 056605 Google Scholar
[77]	Guo Z, Ji L, Yu Q, et al. 2019 Plasma Phys. and Control. Fusion 61 065007 Google Scholar
[78]	Piazza A D, Hatsagortsyan K Z, Keitel C H 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 220403 Google Scholar
[79]	Liu C, Shen B, Zhang X, et al. 2018 Phys. Plasmas 25 023107 Google Scholar
[80]	Gong Z, Mackenroth F, Yan X Q, Arefiev A V 2019 Sci. Rep. 9 1
[81]	Ji L L, Pukhov A, Nerush E N, et al. 2014 Eur. Phys. J. ST 223 1069 Google Scholar
[82]	Ji L L, Pukhov A, Nerush E N, et al. 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 023109 Google Scholar
[83]	Zhu X L, Yu T P, Sheng Z M, Yin Y, Turcu I C E, Pukhov A 2016 Nat. Commun. 7 1
[84]	Cole J M, Behm K T, Gerstmayr E, et al. 2018 Phys. Rev. X 8 011020
[85]	Poder K, Tamburini M, Sarri G, et al. 2018 Phys. Rev. X 8 031004
[86]	Blackburn T G, Ridgers C P, Kirk J G, Bell A R 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 015001 Google Scholar
[87]	Vranic M, Martins J L, Vieira J, Fonseca R A, Silva L O 2014 Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 134801 Google Scholar
[88]	Wistisen T N, Piazza A D, Knudsen H V, Uggerhøj U I 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 1 Google Scholar
[89]	Ji L L, Snyder J, Shen B F 2019 Plasma Phys. and Control. Fusion 61 065019 Google Scholar
[90]	Snyder J, Ji L L, George K M, et al. 2019 Phys. Plasmas 26 033110 Google Scholar
[91]	Mironov A A, Meuren S, Fedotov A M 2020 Phys. Rev. D 102 053005 Google Scholar
[92]	Ilderton A, King B, Seipt D 2019 Phys. Rev. A 99 042121 Google Scholar
[93]	Gay T J. 2009 Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 57 157
[94]	Jefferson Lab Qweak, 2018 Nature 557 207 Google Scholar
[95]	Schlimme B S, et al. 2013 Phys. Rev. Lett 111 132504 Google Scholar
[96]	Ageev E S, et al. 2005 Phys. Lett. B 612 154 Google Scholar
[97]	Salajegheh M, Mohammad S, Khanpour H, Atashbar T S 2018 Phys. Rev. C 97 055201 Google Scholar
[98]	Huang H, Kewisch J, Liu C, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett 122 204803 Google Scholar
[99]	X J Wang, H Sun, X Luo 2017 Advances in High Energy Phys. 2017 1
[100]	Burkardt M, Miller C A, Nowak W D 2010 Rep. Prog. Phys. 73 016201 Google Scholar
[101]	Sokolov A A, Ternov I M 1964 Sov. Phys. Dokl. 8 1203
[102]	Rathmann F, Saleev A, Nikolaev N N 2014 Phys. Part. Nucl. 45 229 Google Scholar
[103]	Pierce D T, Meier F, Zürcher P 1975 Appl. Phys. Lett. 26 670 Google Scholar
[104]	Batelaan H, Green A S, Hitt B A, Gay T J 1999 Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 4216 Google Scholar
[105]	Hützen A, Thomas J, Böker J, et al. 2019 High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 7 e16 Google Scholar
[106]	Alekseev I, Allgower C, Bai M, et al. 2003 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 499 392 Google Scholar
[107]	Wu Y, Ji L, Geng X, et al. 2020 Phys. Rev. Appl 13 044064 Google Scholar
[108]	Wu Y, Ji L, Geng X, et al. 2019 Phys. Rev. E 100 043202 Google Scholar
[109]	Hartung A, Morales F, Kunitski M, et al. 2016 Nat. Photon 10 526 Google Scholar
[110]	Trabert D, Hartung A, Eckart S, et al. 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett 120 043202 Google Scholar
[111]	Barth I, Smirnova O 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 013401 Google Scholar
[112]	Rakitzis T P, Samartzis P C, Toomes R L, et al. 2003 Science 300 1936 Google Scholar
[113]	Rakitzis T P 2004 Chem. Phys. Chem. 5 1489 Google Scholar
[114]	Sofikitis D, Kannis C S, Boulogiannis G K, Rakitzis T P 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 083001 Google Scholar
[115]	Sofikitis D, Rubio-Lago L, Bougas L, Alexander A J, Rakitzis T P 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 129 144302 Google Scholar
[116]	Thomas J, Hützen A, Lehrach A, et al. 2020 Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 23 064401 Google Scholar
[117]	Vieira J, Huang C K, Mori W B, Silva L O 2011 Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 14 071303 Google Scholar
[118]	Golovanov A A, Kostyukov I Y, Thomas J, Pukhov 2017 Phys. Plasmas 24 103104 Google Scholar
[119]	Lu W, Huang C, Zhou M, Mori W B, Katsouleas T 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 165002 Google Scholar
[120]	Gonsalves A J, Nakamura K, Lin C, et al. 2011 Nat. Phys 7 862 Google Scholar
[121]	Schmid K, Buck A, Sears C M S, et al. 2010 Phys. Rev. Special Topics-Accel. Beams 13 091301 Google Scholar
[122]	Zou J P, Blanc C L, Papadopoulos D, et al. 2015 High Power Laser Sci. Eng 3 e2 Google Scholar
[123]	Zamfir N V 2014 Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 223 1221 Google Scholar
[124]	Li W, Gan Z, Yu L, et al. 2018 Opt. Lett 43 5681 Google Scholar
[125]	Gomez C H, Blake S P, Chekhlov O, et al. 2010 IOP Publishing 244 032006
[126]	Jin L, Wen M, Zhang X, et al. 2020 Phys. Rev. E 102 011201 Google Scholar
[127]	Hützen A, Thomas J, Lehrach A, et al. 2020 J. Phys.: Conf. Series 1596 012013 Google Scholar
[128]	Makdisi Y 1998 AIP Conf. Proc. 451 40
[129]	Roser T (Edited by A Chao and M Tigner) 2002 Handbook of Accelerator Physics and Engineering (Singapore: World Scientific)

[1]	Zhang Kai-Lin, Han Sheng-Xian, Yue Sheng-Jun, Liu Zuo-Ye, Hu Bi-Tao. Influence of strong laser field on nuclear α decay. Acta Physica Sinica, 2024, 73(6): 062101. doi: 10.7498/aps.73.20231627
[2]	Chen Zhen, Wang Shuai-Peng, Li Tie-Fu, You Jian-Qiang. Counter-rotating effect on frequency shift of flux qubit in ultrastrongly coupled circuit-quantum-electrodynamics system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(12): 124204. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200474
[3]	Wei Liu-Lei, Cai Hong-Bo, Zhang Wen-Shuai, Tian Jian-Min, Zhang En-Hao, Xiong Jun, Zhu Shao-Ping. Enhancement of high-energy electron yield by interaction of ultra-intense laser pulses with micro-structured foam target. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(9): 094101. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182291
[4]	Cai Huai-Peng^1\2, Gao Jian^1\2, Li Bo-Yuan^1\2, Liu Feng^1\2, Chen Li-Ming^1\2\3, Yuan Xiao-Hui^1\2, Chen Min^1\2, Sheng Zheng-Ming^1\2\4\5, Zhang Jie^1\2\3. High order harmonics generation by relativistically circularly polarized laser-solid interaction. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(21): 214205. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20181574
[5]	Yang Si-Qian, Zhou Wei-Min, Wang Si-Ming, Jiao Jin-Long, Zhang Zhi-Meng, Cao Lei-Feng, Gu Yu-Qiu, Zhang Bao-Han. Focusing effect of channel target on ultra-intense laser-accelerated proton beam. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(18): 184101. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.184101
[6]	Li Xia-Zhi, Zou De-Bin, Zhou Hong-Yu, Zhang Shi-Jie, Zhao Na, Yu De-Yao, Zhuo Hong-Bin. Effect of plasma grating roughness on high-order harmonic generation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(24): 244209. doi: 10.7498/aps.66.244209
[7]	Yin Chuan-Lei, Wang Wei-Min, Liao Guo-Qian, Li Meng-Chao, Li Yu-Tong, Zhang Jie. Ultrahigh-energy electron beam generated by ultra-intense circularly polarized laser pulses. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(14): 144102. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.144102
[8]	Li Wen-Fang, Du Jin-Jin, Wen Rui-Juan, Yang Peng-Fei, Li Gang, Zhang Tian-Cai. Single-atom transfer in a strongly coupled cavity quantum electrodynamics: experiment and Monte Carlo simulation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(24): 244205. doi: 10.7498/aps.63.244205
[9]	Wang Guang-Hui, Wang Xiao-Fang, Dong Ke-Gong. Ultra-short ultra-intense laser guiding and its influence on electron acceleration. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(16): 165201. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.165201
[10]	Li Yu-Tong, Liu Feng, Zhang Yi, Lin Xiao-Xuan, Wang Shou-Jun, Wang Zhao-Hua, Li Ying-Jun, Sheng Zheng-Ming, Xu Miao-Hua, Wei Zhi-Yi, Zhang Jie, Zheng Jun, Meng Li-Min. Enhancement of ion generation in low-contrast laser-foil interactions by defocusing. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(4): 045204. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.045204
[11]	Chen Xiang, Mi Xian-Wu. Studys of characteristics for pump-induced emission and anharmonic cavity-QED in quantum dot-cavity systems. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(4): 044202. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.044202
[12]	Yan Chun-Yan, Zhang Qiu-Ju, Luo Mu-Hua. Generation of attosecond X-ray pulse in the interaction between the pulses and the relativistic electrons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(3): 035202. doi: 10.7498/aps.60.035202
[13]	Zhang Bao-Han, Wang Xiao-Fang, Dong Ke-Gong, Gu Yu-Qiu, Zhu Bin, Wu Yu-Chi, Cao Lei-Feng, He Ying-Ling, Liu Hong-Jie, Hong Wei, Zhou Wei-Min, Zhao Zong-Qing, Jiao Chun-Ye, Wen Xian-Lun. Experimental generation of 58 MeV quasi-monoenergetic electron beam by ultra-intense femto-second laser wakefield. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(12): 8733-8738. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.8733
[14]	Yan Chun-Yan, Zhang Qiu-Ju. Strong monochromatic harmonics generated by the interaction of two counter-propagating pulses with a foil target. Acta Physica Sinica, 2010, 59(1): 322-328. doi: 10.7498/aps.59.322
[15]	Wang Zhi, Chen Jia-Er, Yan Xue-Qing, Lu Yuan-Rong, Fang Jia-Xun, Guo Zhi-Yu. Relation between dynamic parameters and limiting current in separated function radio frequency quadrupole accelerator. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(12): 6298-6301. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.6298
[16]	SHAO LEIL, HUO YU-KUN, WANG PING-XIAO, KONG QING, YUAN XIANG-QUN, FENG LIANG. EFFECT OF FIELD POLARIZATION DIRECTION ON ACCELERATING ELECTRON WITH EXTRA-INTENSE STATIONARY LASER BEAM. Acta Physica Sinica, 2001, 50(7): 1284-1289. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.1284
[17]	LIU JIAN-SHENG, LI RU-XIN, ZHU PIN-PIN, XU ZHI-ZHAN, LIU JING-RU. DYNAMICS OF LARGE-SIZE ATOMIC CLUSTERS IN ULTRA-SHORT HIGH-INTENSITY LASER PULSES. Acta Physica Sinica, 2001, 50(6): 1121-1127. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.1121
[18]	XIA JIANG-FAN, ZHANG JUN, ZHANG JIE. MODELING THE ASTROPHYSICAL DYNAMICAL PROCESS WITH LASER-PLASMAS. Acta Physica Sinica, 2001, 50(5): 994-1000. doi: 10.7498/aps.50.994
[19]	WANG YOU-NIAN. DYNAMIC INTERACTING FORCE AND EVOLUTION OF COULOMB EXPLOSION PATTERNS FOR SWIFT H+2 PENETRATING THROUGH SOLIDS. Acta Physica Sinica, 1999, 48(6): 011118. doi: 10.7498/aps.48.11118
[20]	KONG QING, ZHU LI-JUN, WANG JIA-XIANG, HUO YU-KUN. ELECTRON DYNAMICS IN THE EXTRA-INTENSE STATIONARY LASER FIELD. Acta Physica Sinica, 1999, 48(4): 650-660. doi: 10.7498/aps.48.650

Catalog

Vol. 70, Issue 8 - 2021-04-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 6687
PDF Downloads: 241
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板