Image quality evaluation of multimodal imaging of muon

Huo Yong-Gang; Yan Jiang-Yu; Zhang Quan-Hu

doi:10.7498/aps.71.20211083

Abstract

Both the information about the scattering of muons due to their interaction with material and the information about the material-stopped muons generating secondary induced neutrons effectively are used for multimodal imaging of muon. In order to evaluate the image quality of multimodal imaging of muon, the detection model is established based on Geant4 and the reliability of the detection model is verified. Both the multiple Coulomb scattering module and the muon induced neutron module prove to be reliable. The multimodal imaging simulation program is developed, and the images are reconstructed on the basis of the simulated data. Four imaging models are developed. The first model is a line pair model used to study the spatial resolution of reconstructed images with imaging time ranging from two hours to two weeks. The line pair model is composed of ²³⁵U and the length of each line pair is set to be 100 mm. The cross sections are set to be 4², 4², 6², 6², 10², 10², 20², and 20² mm², respectively. The second model is a cube model used to study the material resolution of reconstructed images with imaging time ranging from one hour to twelve hours. The side length of each cube is 100 mm. The third model is the cladding model used to test the reliability of multimodal imaging images in complex shielding situations. The outermost layer is of lead, with the side length being 140 mm and the thickness 40 mm. The middle layer is of iron, with the side length being 100 mm and the thickness 40 mm. The innermost layer of ²³⁵U, with the side length being 60 mm. The last letter model is used to calculate the structural similarity of reconstructed images, with imaging time ranging from half an hour to twelve hours. The letter model is made of ²³⁵U and consists of cubes with side length of 50 mm. The letters “E” and “P” are made up of 16 cubes and 15 cubes respectively. The spatial resolution reaches 4 mm when imaging time is within 12 hours. The ²³⁵U and other common high-z, medium-z, and low-z material can be distinguished when imaging time is on the order of hours. Muon scattering imaging image of the cladding model will cause misjudgment. However, the multimodal imaging image can correctly reflect the existence of ²³⁵U. The structure similarity between the reconstructed image and the reference image in different imaging times proves that multimodal imaging has higher quality than single imaging method. The study indicates that the multimodal imaging of muon has better imaging quality, can adapt to more complex imaging scenes and has more advantages in the detection and recognition of special nuclear material than muon imaging method with single interaction information.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

School of Nuclear Engineering, Rocket Force University of Engineering, Xi’an 710025, China

Corresponding author: Zhang Quan-Hu, zhangqh_102@sina.com

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Mollerach S, Roulet E 2018 Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 98 85 Google Scholar
[2]	罗小为, 杨燕兴, 李样, 鲍煜, 殳蕾 2020 原子能科学技术 54 2296 Google Scholar Luo X W, Yang Y X, Li Y, Bao Y, Shu L 2020 Atom. Energ. Sci. Technol. 54 2296 Google Scholar
[3]	Shukla P, Sankrith S 2018 Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33 1850175 Google Scholar
[4]	于百蕙 2016 博士学位论文 (北京: 清华大学) Yu B H 2016 Ph. D. Dissertation (Beijing: Tsinghua University) (in Chinese)
[5]	Lorenzo B, Raffaello D A, Andrea G 2020 Rev. Phys. 5 100038 Google Scholar
[6]	Erlandson A, Anghel V N P, Godin D, Jewett C, Thompson M 2021 J. Instrum. 16 02024
[7]	Chatzidakis S, Liu Z Z, Hayward J P, Scaglione J 2018 Appl. Phys. 123 124903 Google Scholar
[8]	Ayuso S, Blanco J J, Tejedor J, Herrero R J, Vrublevskyy I, Población O G, Medina J 2021 J. Space Weather Space Clim. 11 13 Google Scholar
[9]	Durham J M, Poulson D, Plaud-Ramos K, Bacon J, Chichester D L, Guardincerri E, Morris C L, Plaud-Ramos K, Schwendiman W, Tolman J D, Winston P 2018 Phys. Rev. Appl. 9 044013 Google Scholar
[10]	Procureur S 2018 Nucl. Instru. and Meth. A 878 169 Google Scholar
[11]	Borozdin K N, Hogan G E, Morris C, Priedhorsky W C, Saunders A, Schultz L J, Teasdale M E 2003 Nature 422 277
[12]	智宇, 周静, 陈雷, 李沛玉, 赵明锐, 刘雯迪, 贾世海, 张昀昱, 胡守扬 2020 原子能科学技术 54 990 Google Scholar Zhi Y, Zhou J, Chen L, Li P Y, Zhao M R, Liu W D, Jia S H, Zhang Y Y, Hu S Y 2020 Atom. Energ. Sci. Technol. 54 990 Google Scholar
[13]	Schultz L J, Borozdin K N, Gomez J J, Hogan G E, Mcgill J A, Morris C L, Priedhorsky W C, Saunders A, Teasdale M E 2004 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 519 687 Google Scholar
[14]	Baesso P, Cussans D, Glaysher P, Thomay C, Vassallo C, Velthuis J, Quillin S, Robertson S, Steer C 2012 J. Instrum. 7 P11018 Google Scholar
[15]	Gnanvo K, Grasso L, Hohlmann M, Locke J B, Quintero A, Mitra D 2011 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 652 16 Google Scholar
[16]	Chen X L, Wang Y, Chen G, Han D, Guo B, Yu Y, Zhang Q, Lyu P, Wang F 2020 J. Instrum. 15 C03012 Google Scholar
[17]	Schultz L J, Borozdin K N, Gomez J J, Hogan G E, Mc Gill J A, Morris C L, Priedhorsky W C, Saunders A, Teasdale M E 2003 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 519 687
[18]	Schultz L J, Blanpied G S, Borozdin K N, Fraser A M, Hengartner N W, Klimenko A V, Morris C L, Orum C, Sossong M J 2007 IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16 1985 Google Scholar
[19]	Hou L J, Huo Y G, Zuo W M, Yao Q X, Yang J Q, Zhang Q H 2020 Nucl. Eng. Technol. 53 208
[20]	Warren G A, Caggiano J A, Bertozzi W, Korbly S, Ledoux R J, Park W H 2010 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 57 317 Google Scholar
[21]	Guardincerri E, Bacon J, Borozdin K, Matthew D J, Fabritius J, Hecht A, Milner E C, Miyadera H, Morris C L, Perry J, Poulson D 2015 Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 789 109 Google Scholar
[22]	Bacon J D, Borozdin K N, Fabritius II J M, Morris C, Perry J O 2013 Muon Induced Fission Neutrons in Coincidence with Muon Tomography (Los Alamos, Los Alamos National Lab, LA-UR-13-28292 [R])
[23]	Volker E, Oberacker, Umar A S, Karpeshin F F 2004 arXiv: nucl-th/0403087 [nucl-th]
[24]	Morris C, Durham J M, Guardincerri E, Bacon J D, Wang Z H, Fellows S, Poulson D C, Plaud-Ramos K O, Daughton T M, Johnson O R 2015 A new method of passive counting of nuclear missile warheads -a white paper for the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (Los Alamos: Los Alamos National Lab, LA-UR-15-26068 [R])
[25]	Blackwell T B, Kudryavtsev V A 2015 J. Instrum. 10 05006
[26]	何伟波 2019 博士学位论文 (合肥: 中国科学技术大学) He W B 2019 Ph. D. Dissertation (Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China) (in Chinese)
[27]	Yan J Y, Zhang Q H, Huo Y G http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1958.O4.20210529.1750.002.html [2021-06-08]
[28]	Wang Z, Bovik A, Sheikh H R, Simoncelli E P 2004 IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13 600 Google Scholar
[29]	Ide K, Becchetti M F, Flaska M, Poitrasson-Riviere A, Hamel M C, Polack J K, Lawrence C C, Clarke S D, Pozzi S A 2012 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 694 24 Google Scholar
[30]	李凯文, 徐琳, 陈强 2020 计算机科学 47 159 Google Scholar Li K W, Xu L, Chen Q 2020 Comput. Sci. 47 159 Google Scholar
[31]	何凯, 牛俊慧, 沈成南, 卢雯霞 2018 天津大学学报 51 763 He K, Niu J H, Shen C N, Lu W X 2018 J. Tianjin Univ. 51 763
[32]	肖洒 2018 博士学位论文(绵阳: 中国工程物理研究院) Xiao S 2018 Ph. D. Dissertation (Mianyang: China Academy of Engineering Physics) (in Chinese)
[33]	Malyshkina Y, Pshenichnova I, Mishustina I, Hughesd T, Heidd O, Greiner W 2012 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 289 79 Google Scholar
[34]	Kasztelan M, Jedrzejczak K, Szabelski J 2019 Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6 1950046

Cited By

图 1 探测模型设置

Figure 1. Detecting model setting.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 缪子多模态成像图解(绿色为发生散射的有效缪子, 蓝色为产生次级诱发中子的有效缪子)

Figure 2. Diagram of multimodal imaging of muon (Green trajectories are the effective scattering muons and blue trajectory is the effective muon producing secondary induced neutrons).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 SSIM评价算法框架

Figure 3. Flow chart of SSIM objective evaluation.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 散射模块验证模型

Figure 4. Validation model of scattering module.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 5 4 GeV缪子入射10 cm厚不同材料的散射角分布　(a) 立体角分布; (b) 平面角分布

Figure 5. Scattering angle distribution of 4 GeV muons incident on different materials with a thickness of 10 cm: (a) Solid angle distribution; (b) plane angle distribution.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 6 诱发中子模块验证模型

Figure 6. Validation model of induced neutrons.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 7 2 GeV负缪子入射不同铀立方体后产生的次级中子能谱, HEU(红色)、LEU(绿色)、DU(蓝色)

Figure 7. Secondary neutron spectrum that result from negative muon : HEU (red), LEU (green), DU (blue).

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 8 成像模型　(a) 线对模型; (b) 物块模型; (c) 包覆模型; (d)字母模型

Figure 8. Imaging models: (a) Line pair model; (b) object model; (c) cladding model; (d) letter model.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 9 不同成像时间内线对模型成像结果

Figure 9. Imaging results of the line pair model in different imaging time.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 10 不同成像时间内物块模型成像结果

Figure 10. Imaging results of the object model in different imaging time.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 11 不同成像时间内物块模型的重建多模态信息量

Figure 11. Amount of reconstructed multimodal information of the object model in different imaging time.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 12 铅立方体和包覆模型成像结果　(a) 铅立方体的散射成像图像; (b) 包覆模型的散射成像图像; (c) 包覆模型的多模态成像图像

Figure 12. Imaging results of lead cube and cladding model: (a) Scattering imaging image of lead cube; (b) scattering imaging image of cladding model; (c) multimodal imaging image of cladding model.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 13 参考图像和3种成像方法成像灰度图

Figure 13. Reference image and gray images of three imaging methods.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 14 不同成像时间内3种成像方法成像图像的SSIM计算结果

Figure 14. SSIM calculation results of three imaging methods in different imaging time.

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

表 1 4 GeV缪子穿过10 cm厚不同材料的散射角

Table 1. Multiple scattering for 4 GeV muons passing through 10 cm of various materials.

材料 L₀/cm 实验值θ/rad 理论值θ/mrad 相对误差/%

U 0.32 21.58 21.49 0.42
Pb 0.56 15.92 15.94 0.13
Fe 1.76 8.67 8.64 0.35
Al 8.89 3.74 3.62 3.31

DownLoad: CSV

表 2 铀立方体的中子出射率

Table 2. Rate of neutrons that are emitted from bare cubes of uranium.

出射中子数/入射缪子数
HEU LEU DU

1 MeV负缪子 30.8 11.7 9.35
1 MeV正缪子 0.0538 0.0193 0.0164
2 GeV负缪子 0.0291 0.0152 0.0116
2 GeV正缪子 0.0286 0.0130 0.0124

DownLoad: CSV

[1]	Mollerach S, Roulet E 2018 Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 98 85 Google Scholar
[2]	罗小为, 杨燕兴, 李样, 鲍煜, 殳蕾 2020 原子能科学技术 54 2296 Google Scholar Luo X W, Yang Y X, Li Y, Bao Y, Shu L 2020 Atom. Energ. Sci. Technol. 54 2296 Google Scholar
[3]	Shukla P, Sankrith S 2018 Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33 1850175 Google Scholar
[4]	于百蕙 2016 博士学位论文 (北京: 清华大学) Yu B H 2016 Ph. D. Dissertation (Beijing: Tsinghua University) (in Chinese)
[5]	Lorenzo B, Raffaello D A, Andrea G 2020 Rev. Phys. 5 100038 Google Scholar
[6]	Erlandson A, Anghel V N P, Godin D, Jewett C, Thompson M 2021 J. Instrum. 16 02024
[7]	Chatzidakis S, Liu Z Z, Hayward J P, Scaglione J 2018 Appl. Phys. 123 124903 Google Scholar
[8]	Ayuso S, Blanco J J, Tejedor J, Herrero R J, Vrublevskyy I, Población O G, Medina J 2021 J. Space Weather Space Clim. 11 13 Google Scholar
[9]	Durham J M, Poulson D, Plaud-Ramos K, Bacon J, Chichester D L, Guardincerri E, Morris C L, Plaud-Ramos K, Schwendiman W, Tolman J D, Winston P 2018 Phys. Rev. Appl. 9 044013 Google Scholar
[10]	Procureur S 2018 Nucl. Instru. and Meth. A 878 169 Google Scholar
[11]	Borozdin K N, Hogan G E, Morris C, Priedhorsky W C, Saunders A, Schultz L J, Teasdale M E 2003 Nature 422 277
[12]	智宇, 周静, 陈雷, 李沛玉, 赵明锐, 刘雯迪, 贾世海, 张昀昱, 胡守扬 2020 原子能科学技术 54 990 Google Scholar Zhi Y, Zhou J, Chen L, Li P Y, Zhao M R, Liu W D, Jia S H, Zhang Y Y, Hu S Y 2020 Atom. Energ. Sci. Technol. 54 990 Google Scholar
[13]	Schultz L J, Borozdin K N, Gomez J J, Hogan G E, Mcgill J A, Morris C L, Priedhorsky W C, Saunders A, Teasdale M E 2004 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 519 687 Google Scholar
[14]	Baesso P, Cussans D, Glaysher P, Thomay C, Vassallo C, Velthuis J, Quillin S, Robertson S, Steer C 2012 J. Instrum. 7 P11018 Google Scholar
[15]	Gnanvo K, Grasso L, Hohlmann M, Locke J B, Quintero A, Mitra D 2011 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 652 16 Google Scholar
[16]	Chen X L, Wang Y, Chen G, Han D, Guo B, Yu Y, Zhang Q, Lyu P, Wang F 2020 J. Instrum. 15 C03012 Google Scholar
[17]	Schultz L J, Borozdin K N, Gomez J J, Hogan G E, Mc Gill J A, Morris C L, Priedhorsky W C, Saunders A, Teasdale M E 2003 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 519 687
[18]	Schultz L J, Blanpied G S, Borozdin K N, Fraser A M, Hengartner N W, Klimenko A V, Morris C L, Orum C, Sossong M J 2007 IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16 1985 Google Scholar
[19]	Hou L J, Huo Y G, Zuo W M, Yao Q X, Yang J Q, Zhang Q H 2020 Nucl. Eng. Technol. 53 208
[20]	Warren G A, Caggiano J A, Bertozzi W, Korbly S, Ledoux R J, Park W H 2010 IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 57 317 Google Scholar
[21]	Guardincerri E, Bacon J, Borozdin K, Matthew D J, Fabritius J, Hecht A, Milner E C, Miyadera H, Morris C L, Perry J, Poulson D 2015 Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 789 109 Google Scholar
[22]	Bacon J D, Borozdin K N, Fabritius II J M, Morris C, Perry J O 2013 Muon Induced Fission Neutrons in Coincidence with Muon Tomography (Los Alamos, Los Alamos National Lab, LA-UR-13-28292 [R])
[23]	Volker E, Oberacker, Umar A S, Karpeshin F F 2004 arXiv: nucl-th/0403087 [nucl-th]
[24]	Morris C, Durham J M, Guardincerri E, Bacon J D, Wang Z H, Fellows S, Poulson D C, Plaud-Ramos K O, Daughton T M, Johnson O R 2015 A new method of passive counting of nuclear missile warheads -a white paper for the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (Los Alamos: Los Alamos National Lab, LA-UR-15-26068 [R])
[25]	Blackwell T B, Kudryavtsev V A 2015 J. Instrum. 10 05006
[26]	何伟波 2019 博士学位论文 (合肥: 中国科学技术大学) He W B 2019 Ph. D. Dissertation (Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China) (in Chinese)
[27]	Yan J Y, Zhang Q H, Huo Y G http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1958.O4.20210529.1750.002.html [2021-06-08]
[28]	Wang Z, Bovik A, Sheikh H R, Simoncelli E P 2004 IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13 600 Google Scholar
[29]	Ide K, Becchetti M F, Flaska M, Poitrasson-Riviere A, Hamel M C, Polack J K, Lawrence C C, Clarke S D, Pozzi S A 2012 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 694 24 Google Scholar
[30]	李凯文, 徐琳, 陈强 2020 计算机科学 47 159 Google Scholar Li K W, Xu L, Chen Q 2020 Comput. Sci. 47 159 Google Scholar
[31]	何凯, 牛俊慧, 沈成南, 卢雯霞 2018 天津大学学报 51 763 He K, Niu J H, Shen C N, Lu W X 2018 J. Tianjin Univ. 51 763
[32]	肖洒 2018 博士学位论文(绵阳: 中国工程物理研究院) Xiao S 2018 Ph. D. Dissertation (Mianyang: China Academy of Engineering Physics) (in Chinese)
[33]	Malyshkina Y, Pshenichnova I, Mishustina I, Hughesd T, Heidd O, Greiner W 2012 Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 289 79 Google Scholar
[34]	Kasztelan M, Jedrzejczak K, Szabelski J 2019 Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6 1950046

[1]	Liu Ye, Niu He-Ran, Li Bing-Bing, Ma Xin-Hua, Cui Shu-Wang. Application of machine learning in cosmic ray particle identification. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(14): 140202. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20230334
[2]	He Zhi-Ye, Zhang Yan-Dong, Tang Chun-Hua, Li Jun-Li, Li Si-Wei, Yu Bin. Analysis of influence of imaging resolution of relay lens on image reconstruction quality in pixel-wise coded exposure imaging technology. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(2): 024201. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221588
[3]	Li Yu-Peng, Tang Xiu-Zhang, Chen Xin-Nan, Gao Chun-Yu, Chen Yan-Nan, Fan Cheng-Jun, Lü Jian-You. Experimental study on material discrimination based on muon discrete energy. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(2): 029501. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221645
[4]	Zhang Jian-Ming, Li Zhi-Wei, Liu Fang, Li Jing-Tai, Mao Xin, Cheng Ya-Ping, Pang Jie, Feng Xin-Zhuo, Ni Si-Dao, Ouyang Xiao-Ping, Han Ran. Influence of multiple Coulomb scattering on accuracy of muon transmission imaging of small-scale matter. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(2): 021401. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20221792
[5]	Zhang Hai-Peng, Zhao Chang-Zhe, Ju Xiao-Lu, Tang Jie, Xiao Ti-Qiao. Improving quality of crystal diffraction based X-ray ghost imaging through iterative reconstruction algorithm. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(7): 074201. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211978
[6]	Su Ning, Liu Yuan-Yuan, Wang Li, Cheng Jian-Ping. Muon radiography simulation for underground palace of Qinshihuang Mausoleum. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(6): 064201. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20211582
[7]	Mi Li-Gong, Xie Quan, Zhang Li, Wu Zhong-Zu. Mass distribution and generation of elementary fermions. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(23): 231201. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210854
[8]	Han Rui-Long, Cai Ming-Hui, Yang Tao, Xu Liang-Liang, Xia Qing, Han Jian-Wei. Mechanism of cosmic ray high-energy particles charging test mass. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(22): 229501. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210747
[9]	Yan Jiang-Yu, Zhang Quan-Hu, Huo Yong-Gang. Multimodal imaging of muon based on scattering and secondary induced neutrons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(19): 191401. doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20210804
[10]	. Image Quality Evaluation of Multi-modal Imaging of Muon. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, (): . doi: 10.7498/aps.70.20211083
[11]	Yao Jun-Cai, Shen Jing. Objective assessment of image quality based on image content contrast perception. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(14): 148702. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200335
[12]	Yao Jun-Cai, Liu Gui-Zhong. Objective assessment method of image quality based on visual perception of image content. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(10): 108702. doi: 10.7498/aps.67.20180168
[13]	Yu Tao, Luo Mao-Kang, Hua Yun. The resonant behavior of fractional harmonic oscillator with fluctuating mass. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(21): 210503. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.210503
[14]	Yu Tao, Zhang Lu, Luo Mao-Kang. The resonant behavior of a linear harmonic oscillator with fluctuating mass. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(12): 120504. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.120504
[15]	Le Gui-Ming, Han Yan-Ben. Analysis of 1991 March 24 CME’s structure using galactic cosmic rays’ data. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(1): 467-470. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.467
[16]	SUN LUO-RUI. A STUDY OF THE ARRIVAL DIRECTION OF COSMIC RAYS WITH AVERAGE ENERGY ABOUT 2×1015 eV. Acta Physica Sinica, 1985, 34(2): 196-204. doi: 10.7498/aps.34.196
[17]	HE ZUO-XIU, LIN DA-HANG, ZHAO PEI-ZHEN. QUARKONIUM POTENTIAL MODEL WITH A NON-ZERO GLUON EFFECTIVE MASS. Acta Physica Sinica, 1982, 31(4): 525-531. doi: 10.7498/aps.31.525
[18]	LO LIAU-FU, LU TAN, YANG KUO-SHEN. ON THE ANOMALOUS INTERACTION, LEPTON STRUCTURE, AND μ-e MASS-DIFFERENCE. Acta Physica Sinica, 1966, 22(3): 334-340. doi: 10.7498/aps.22.334
[19]	. . Acta Physica Sinica, 1965, 21(10): 1814-1816. doi: 10.7498/aps.21.1814
[20]	. . Acta Physica Sinica, 1960, 16(3): 175-176. doi: 10.7498/aps.16.175

Catalog

Vol. 71, Issue 2 - 2022-01-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 3684
PDF Downloads: 86
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板