Two-dimensional bright soliton in  exciton-polariton condensate

Huang Yi-Fan; Liang Zhao-Xin

doi:10.7498/aps.72.20230425

Abstract

In non-conservative nonlinear systems, the basic physical mechanics of soliton generation is that the kinetic energy and nonlinear terms of the system, as well as the gain and dissipation terms reach a double dynamic balance. How to generate stable free high-dimensional solitons in such a system is currently a challenging topic in soliton theory. In this article, we propose a theoretical scheme for realizing two-dimensional free bright solitons in exciton-polariton Bose-Einstein condensates, which proposes a physical mechanism for generating stable two-dimensional free space bright solitons through time periodic modulation interactions and a dual balance between gain and dissipation. In this end, firstly, we obtain the dynamic equations of two-dimensional bright soliton parameters through the Lagrange variational method, and obtain its dynamically stable parameter space. Secondly, the evolution of the generalized dissipative Gross-Pitaveskii equation is numerically simulated to verify the stability of two-dimensional bright solitons. Finally, we add Gaussian noise to simulate a real experimental environment and find that two-dimensional bright solitons are also stable within the observable time range of the experiment. Our experimental scheme opens the door to the study of bright solitons in high-dimensional free space in non-conservative systems.

Keywords:

Authors and contacts

Department of Physics, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China

Corresponding author: Liang Zhao-Xin, zhxliang@zjnu.edu.cn

Funds: Project supported by the Key Program of the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, China (Grant No. LZ21A040001) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12074344)

FullText HTML : translate this paragraph

References

[1]	Saito H, Ueda M 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 040403 Google Scholar
[2]	Zhang Y C, Zhou Z W, Malomed B A, Pu H 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 253901 Google Scholar
[3]	Dalfovo F, Stringari S 1996 Phys. Rev. A 53 2477 Google Scholar
[4]	Carr L D, Clark C W 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 010403 Google Scholar
[5]	Kartashov Y V, Malomed B A, Torner L 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 247 Google Scholar
[6]	Maucher F, Henkel N, Saffman M, Królikowski W, Skupin S, Pohl T 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 170401 Google Scholar
[7]	Tikhonenkov I, Malomed B A, Vardi A 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 090406 Google Scholar
[8]	Kippenberg T J, Gaeta A L, Lipson M, Gorodetsky M L 2018 Science 361 567 Google Scholar
[9]	Smirnov L A, Smirnova D A, Ostrovskaya E A, Kivshar Y S 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 235310 Google Scholar
[10]	Xu X R, Chen L, Zhang Z D, Liang Z X 2019 J. Phys. B 52 025303 Google Scholar
[11]	Jia C Y, Liang Z X 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 040502 Google Scholar
[12]	Jia C Y, Wu R K, Hu Y, Liu W M, Liang Z X 2021 Front. Phys. 9 805841 Google Scholar
[13]	Zhang Y L, Jia C Y, Liang Z X 2022 Chin. Phys. Lett. 39 020501 Google Scholar
[14]	Jia C Y, Liang Z X 2022 Entropy 24 1789 Google Scholar
[15]	余超凡, 梁国栋, 曹锡金 2008 物理学报 57 4402 Google Scholar Yu C F, Liang G D, Cao X J 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 4402 Google Scholar
[16]	陈礼元, 高超, 林机, 李慧军 2022 物理学报 71 181101 Google Scholar Chen L Y, Gao C, Lin J, Li H J 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 181101 Google Scholar
[17]	Kasprzak J, Richard M, Kundermann S, et al. 2006 Nature 443 409 Google Scholar
[18]	Balili R, Hartwell V, Snoke D, Pfeiffer L, West K 2007 Science 316 1007 Google Scholar
[19]	Deng H, Weihs G, Santori C, Bloch J, Yamamoto Y 2002 Science 298 199 Google Scholar
[20]	Carusotto I, Ciuti C 2013 Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 299 Google Scholar
[21]	Byrnes T, Kim N Y, Yamamoto Y 2014 Nat. Phys. 10 803 Google Scholar
[22]	Plumhof J D, Stöferle T, Mai L, Scherf U, Mahrt R F 2014 Nat. Mater. 13 247 Google Scholar
[23]	Su R, Ghosh S, Wang J, Liu S, Diederichs C, Liew T C H, Xiong Q H 2020 Nat. Phys. 16 301 Google Scholar
[24]	李峰, 熊启华 2022 物理 51 445 Google Scholar Li F, Xiong Q H 2022 Physics 51 445 Google Scholar
[25]	Sieberer L M, Buchhold M, Diehl S 2016 Rep. Prog. Phys. 79 096001 Google Scholar
[26]	Ciuti C, Schwendimann P, Quattropani A 2001 Phys. Rev. B 63 041303(R Google Scholar
[27]	Klass M, Flayac H, Amthor M, Savenko I G, Brodbeck S, Ala-Nissila T, Klembt S, Schneider C, Höfling S 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 017401 Google Scholar
[28]	Schneider C, Winkler K, Fraser M D, Kamp M, Yamamoto Y, Ostrovskaya E A, Höfling S 2016 Rep. Prog. Phys. 80 016503 Google Scholar
[29]	Shelykh I A, Kavokin A V, Rubo Y G, Liew T C H, Malpuech G 2010 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 25 013001 Google Scholar
[30]	Sanvitto D, Kéna-Cohen S 2016 Nat. Mater. 15 1061 Google Scholar
[31]	Takemura N, Trebaol S, Wouters M, Portella-Oberli M T, Deveaud B 2014 Nat. Phys. 10 500 Google Scholar
[32]	Sun Y, Yoon Y, Steger M, Liu G, Pfeiffer L N, West K, Snoke D W, Nelson K A 2017 Nat. Phys. 13 870 Google Scholar
[33]	Navadeh-Toupchi M, Takemura N, Anderson M D, Oberli D Y, Portella-Oberli M T 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 047402 Google Scholar
[34]	Lai C W, Kim N Y, Utsunomiya S, et al. 2007 Nature 450 529 Google Scholar
[35]	St-Jean P, Goblot V, Galopin E, Lemaître A, Ozawa T, Le Gratiet T, Sagnes I, Bloch J, Amo A 2017 Nat. Photonics 11 651 Google Scholar
[36]	Manni F, Lagoudakis K G, Pietka B, Fontanesi L, Wouters M, Savona V, André R, Deveaud-Plédran B 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 176401 Google Scholar
[37]	Thunert M, Janot A, Franke H, Sturm C, Michalsky T, Martín T, Viña L, Rosenow B, Grundmann M, Schmidt-Grund R 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93 064203 Google Scholar
[38]	Sala V G, Solnyshkov D D, Carusotto I, et al. 2015 Phys. Rev. X 5 011034 Google Scholar
[39]	Whittaker C E, Cancellieri E, Walker P M, et al. 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 097401 Google Scholar
[40]	Klembt S, Harder T H, Egorov O A, et al. 2018 Nature 562 552 Google Scholar
[41]	Lim H T, Togan E, Kroner M, Miguel-Sanchez J, Imamoğlu A 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 14540 Google Scholar
[42]	陈海军, 任元, 王华 2022 物理学报 71 056701 Google Scholar Chen H J, Ren Y, Wang H 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 056701 Google Scholar
[43]	郭慧, 王雅君, 王林雪, 张晓斐 2020 物理学报 69 010302 Google Scholar Guo H, Wang Y J, Wang L X, Zhang X F 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 010302 Google Scholar
[44]	Kivshar Y S, Królikowski W 1995 Opt. Commun. 114 353 Google Scholar
[45]	Frantzeskakis D J 2010 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43 213001 Google Scholar
[46]	Tran P 1998 Phys. Rev. E 58 8049 Google Scholar

Cited By

图 1 峰值密度$\left|\psi\left(r=0\right)\right|^{2}$和单极矩$\left\langle r\right\rangle = \displaystyle\int r\left|\psi\right|^{2}\mathrm{d}\boldsymbol{r}$随时间t演化的图像　(a1), (a2) $\gamma_{{\rm{C}}}=0.60$, $\gamma_{{\rm{R}}}=3.00$, $P_{0}=1.271$; (b1), (b2) $\gamma_{{\rm{C}}}=0.70$, $\gamma_{{\rm{R}}}=3.00$, $P_{0}=1.484$; (c1), (c2) $\gamma_{{\rm{C}}}=0.60$, $\gamma_{{\rm{R}}}=2.60$, $P_{0}=1.142$. 周期振荡相互作用强度取为$g(t)= $$ -2\pi+ 8\pi\sin(\varOmega t)$, 含时演化的前段$t=0$—20, 逐渐打开热源极化子间的相互作用, 同时缓慢减弱径向约束势到零. 其他参数为$R=2.40$, $\omega=2.00$, $\varOmega=30$, $g_{{\rm{R}}}=0$

Figure 1. Time evolution of the peak density $\left|\psi\left(r=0\right)\right|^{2}$ and the monopole moment $\left\langle r\right\rangle = \displaystyle\int r\left|\psi\right|^{2}\mathrm{d}\boldsymbol{r}$: (a1), (a2) $\gamma_{{\rm{C}}}=0.60$, $\gamma_{{\rm{R}}}=3.00$, $P_{0}=1.271$; (b1), (b2) $\gamma_{{\rm{C}}}=0.70$, $\gamma_{{\rm{R}}}=3.00$, $P_{0}=1.484$; (c1), (c2) $\gamma_{{\rm{C}}}=0.60$, $\gamma_{{\rm{R}}}=2.60$, $P_{0}=1.142$. The interaction $g(t)=-2\pi+8\pi\sin(\varOmega t)$ is switched on a little bit at a time while the radial confinement potential is switched off from $t=0$ to 20. Values of other parameters are $R=2.40$, $\omega=2.00$, $\varOmega=30$, $g_{{\rm{R}}}=0$

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 2 图1(a)所描述系统中, 概率密度分布随时间演化的图像. 图中颜色明暗代表概率密度的大小, 颜色越亮表示对应的概率密度越大

Figure 2. Time evolution of the the odds density distribution for the system depicted in Fig. 1(a). The brighter and darker colors in the figure represent the magnitude of the density, and the brighter color indicates the corresponding higher density

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 3 考虑噪声的快热库极限下, 峰值密度$\left|\psi\left(r=0\right)\right|^{2}$(a)随时间演化图像和(b)概率密度分布图像. 周期振荡相互作用强度取为$g(t)=-2\pi+8\pi\sin(\varOmega t)$, 噪音强度为$D=0.01$, 其他参数为$R=2.40$, $\gamma_{{\rm{C}}}=0.60$, $\gamma_{{\rm{R}}}=3.00$, $P_{0}=1.274$, $\omega=2.00$, $\varOmega=30$, $g_{{\rm{R}}}=0$. 图中颜色明暗代表概率密度的大小, 颜色越亮表示对应的概率密度越大

Figure 3. (a) Time evolution of the peak density $\left|\psi\left(r=0\right)\right|^{2}$ and (b) the density distribution in the limit of fast reservoir considering the noise. The interaction $g(t)=-2\pi+8\pi\sin(\varOmega t)$ is switched on a little bit at a time while the radial confinement potential is switched off from $t=0$ to 20. The noise intensity is $D=0.01$. Values of other parameters are $R=2.40$, $\gamma_{{\rm{C}}}=0.60$, $\gamma_{{\rm{R}}}=3.00$, $P_{0}=1.274$, $\omega=2.00$, $\varOmega=30$, $g_{{\rm{R}}}=0$. The brighter and darker colors in the figure represent the magnitude of the density, and the brighter color indicates the corresponding higher density

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

图 4 根据演化耦合方程(4)和方程(5), 峰值密度$\left|\psi\left(r=0\right)\right|^{2}$和概率密度分布图像　(a1)快热库参数空间中峰值密度$\left|\psi\left(r=0\right)\right|^{2}$随时间演化的图像, $R=2.40$, $\gamma_{{\rm{R}}}=3.00$; (b1)在图(a1)基础上再加入强度为$D=0.01$的弱噪声; (c1), (d1)考虑噪声的快热库参数空间中的概率密度分布图; (a2)非快热库参数空间中峰值密度$\left|\psi\left(r=0\right)\right|^{2}$随时间演化的图像, $R=0.24$, $\gamma_{{\rm{R}}}=0.30$; (b2)在图(a2)基础上再加入强度为$D=0.01$的弱噪声; (c2), (d2)考虑噪声的非快热库参数空间中的分叉率密度分布图. 周期振荡相互作用强度取为$g(t)=-2\pi+8\pi\sin(\varOmega t)$, 在$t=30$时加入高斯白噪声, 其他参数为$\gamma_{{\rm{C}}}=0.60$, $P_{0}=1.265$, $\omega=2.20$, $\varOmega=30$, $g_{{\rm{R}}}=0$. 图中颜色明暗代表概率密度的大小, 颜色越亮表示对应的概率密度越大

Figure 4. Time evolution of the peak density $\left|\psi\left(r=0\right)\right|^{2}$ and the monopole moment $\left\langle r\right\rangle =\int r\left|\psi\right|^{2}\mathrm{d}\boldsymbol{r}$ while evolving the coupled equations (4) and (5): (a1) Image of peak density $\left|\psi\left(r=0\right)\right|^{2}$ in the parameter space of fast reservoir with time evolution, $R=2.40$, $\gamma_{{\rm{R}}}=3.00$; (b1) adding a weak noise with intensity D=0.01 to panel (a1); (c1), (d1) image of density distribution in the parameter space of fast reservoir considering the noise; (a2) image of peak density $\left|\psi\left(r=0\right)\right|^{2}$ in the parameter space of non-fast reservoir with time evolution, $R=0.24$, $\gamma_{{\rm{R}}}=0.30$; (b2) adding a weak noise with intensity D = 0.01 to panel (a2); (c2), (d2) image of density distribution in the parameter space of non-fast reservoir considering the noise. The interaction $g(t)=-2\pi+8\pi\sin(\varOmega t)$ is switched on a little bit at a time while the radial confinement potential is switched off from $t=0$ to 20. Gaussian white noise is added at the moment $t=30$, and the other parameters are $\gamma_{{\rm{C}}}=0.60$, $P_{0}=1.265$, $\omega=2.20$, $\varOmega=30$, $g_{{\rm{R}}}=0$. The brighter and darker colors in the figure represent the magnitude of the density, and the brighter color indicates the corresponding higher density

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

[1]	Saito H, Ueda M 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 040403 Google Scholar
[2]	Zhang Y C, Zhou Z W, Malomed B A, Pu H 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 253901 Google Scholar
[3]	Dalfovo F, Stringari S 1996 Phys. Rev. A 53 2477 Google Scholar
[4]	Carr L D, Clark C W 2006 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 010403 Google Scholar
[5]	Kartashov Y V, Malomed B A, Torner L 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 247 Google Scholar
[6]	Maucher F, Henkel N, Saffman M, Królikowski W, Skupin S, Pohl T 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 170401 Google Scholar
[7]	Tikhonenkov I, Malomed B A, Vardi A 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 090406 Google Scholar
[8]	Kippenberg T J, Gaeta A L, Lipson M, Gorodetsky M L 2018 Science 361 567 Google Scholar
[9]	Smirnov L A, Smirnova D A, Ostrovskaya E A, Kivshar Y S 2014 Phys. Rev. B 89 235310 Google Scholar
[10]	Xu X R, Chen L, Zhang Z D, Liang Z X 2019 J. Phys. B 52 025303 Google Scholar
[11]	Jia C Y, Liang Z X 2020 Chin. Phys. Lett. 37 040502 Google Scholar
[12]	Jia C Y, Wu R K, Hu Y, Liu W M, Liang Z X 2021 Front. Phys. 9 805841 Google Scholar
[13]	Zhang Y L, Jia C Y, Liang Z X 2022 Chin. Phys. Lett. 39 020501 Google Scholar
[14]	Jia C Y, Liang Z X 2022 Entropy 24 1789 Google Scholar
[15]	余超凡, 梁国栋, 曹锡金 2008 物理学报 57 4402 Google Scholar Yu C F, Liang G D, Cao X J 2008 Acta Phys. Sin. 57 4402 Google Scholar
[16]	陈礼元, 高超, 林机, 李慧军 2022 物理学报 71 181101 Google Scholar Chen L Y, Gao C, Lin J, Li H J 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 181101 Google Scholar
[17]	Kasprzak J, Richard M, Kundermann S, et al. 2006 Nature 443 409 Google Scholar
[18]	Balili R, Hartwell V, Snoke D, Pfeiffer L, West K 2007 Science 316 1007 Google Scholar
[19]	Deng H, Weihs G, Santori C, Bloch J, Yamamoto Y 2002 Science 298 199 Google Scholar
[20]	Carusotto I, Ciuti C 2013 Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 299 Google Scholar
[21]	Byrnes T, Kim N Y, Yamamoto Y 2014 Nat. Phys. 10 803 Google Scholar
[22]	Plumhof J D, Stöferle T, Mai L, Scherf U, Mahrt R F 2014 Nat. Mater. 13 247 Google Scholar
[23]	Su R, Ghosh S, Wang J, Liu S, Diederichs C, Liew T C H, Xiong Q H 2020 Nat. Phys. 16 301 Google Scholar
[24]	李峰, 熊启华 2022 物理 51 445 Google Scholar Li F, Xiong Q H 2022 Physics 51 445 Google Scholar
[25]	Sieberer L M, Buchhold M, Diehl S 2016 Rep. Prog. Phys. 79 096001 Google Scholar
[26]	Ciuti C, Schwendimann P, Quattropani A 2001 Phys. Rev. B 63 041303(R Google Scholar
[27]	Klass M, Flayac H, Amthor M, Savenko I G, Brodbeck S, Ala-Nissila T, Klembt S, Schneider C, Höfling S 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 017401 Google Scholar
[28]	Schneider C, Winkler K, Fraser M D, Kamp M, Yamamoto Y, Ostrovskaya E A, Höfling S 2016 Rep. Prog. Phys. 80 016503 Google Scholar
[29]	Shelykh I A, Kavokin A V, Rubo Y G, Liew T C H, Malpuech G 2010 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 25 013001 Google Scholar
[30]	Sanvitto D, Kéna-Cohen S 2016 Nat. Mater. 15 1061 Google Scholar
[31]	Takemura N, Trebaol S, Wouters M, Portella-Oberli M T, Deveaud B 2014 Nat. Phys. 10 500 Google Scholar
[32]	Sun Y, Yoon Y, Steger M, Liu G, Pfeiffer L N, West K, Snoke D W, Nelson K A 2017 Nat. Phys. 13 870 Google Scholar
[33]	Navadeh-Toupchi M, Takemura N, Anderson M D, Oberli D Y, Portella-Oberli M T 2019 Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 047402 Google Scholar
[34]	Lai C W, Kim N Y, Utsunomiya S, et al. 2007 Nature 450 529 Google Scholar
[35]	St-Jean P, Goblot V, Galopin E, Lemaître A, Ozawa T, Le Gratiet T, Sagnes I, Bloch J, Amo A 2017 Nat. Photonics 11 651 Google Scholar
[36]	Manni F, Lagoudakis K G, Pietka B, Fontanesi L, Wouters M, Savona V, André R, Deveaud-Plédran B 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 176401 Google Scholar
[37]	Thunert M, Janot A, Franke H, Sturm C, Michalsky T, Martín T, Viña L, Rosenow B, Grundmann M, Schmidt-Grund R 2016 Phys. Rev. B 93 064203 Google Scholar
[38]	Sala V G, Solnyshkov D D, Carusotto I, et al. 2015 Phys. Rev. X 5 011034 Google Scholar
[39]	Whittaker C E, Cancellieri E, Walker P M, et al. 2018 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 097401 Google Scholar
[40]	Klembt S, Harder T H, Egorov O A, et al. 2018 Nature 562 552 Google Scholar
[41]	Lim H T, Togan E, Kroner M, Miguel-Sanchez J, Imamoğlu A 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 14540 Google Scholar
[42]	陈海军, 任元, 王华 2022 物理学报 71 056701 Google Scholar Chen H J, Ren Y, Wang H 2022 Acta Phys. Sin. 71 056701 Google Scholar
[43]	郭慧, 王雅君, 王林雪, 张晓斐 2020 物理学报 69 010302 Google Scholar Guo H, Wang Y J, Wang L X, Zhang X F 2020 Acta Phys. Sin. 69 010302 Google Scholar
[44]	Kivshar Y S, Królikowski W 1995 Opt. Commun. 114 353 Google Scholar
[45]	Frantzeskakis D J 2010 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43 213001 Google Scholar
[46]	Tran P 1998 Phys. Rev. E 58 8049 Google Scholar

[1]	Yang Jia-Qi, Liu Wen-Jun. Propagation characteristics of bright and mixed solitons based on the variable coefficient (3+1)-dimensional cubic-quintic complex Ginzburg-Landau equation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(10): 100504. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222430
[2]	Qiu Xu, Wang Lin-Xue, Chen Guang-Ping, Hu Ai-Yuan, Wen Lin. Dynamics of spin-tensor-momentum coupled Bose-Einstein condensates. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(18): 180304. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20231076
[3]	Li Xin-Yue, Qi Juan-Juan, Zhao Dun, Liu Wu-Ming. Soliton solutions of the spin-orbit coupled binary Bose-Einstein condensate system. Acta Physica Sinica, 2023, 72(10): 106701. doi: 10.7498/aps.72.20222319
[4]	Chen Yi-Xi, Cai Xiao-Yan, Liu Bin, Jiang Xun-Da, Li Yong-Yao. Hidden vortices of quantum droplets in quasi-two dimensional space. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(20): 200302. doi: 10.7498/aps.71.20220709
[5]	Wu Hao, Ren Yuan, Liu Tong, Wang Yuan-Qin, Xing Chao-Yang. Rotational dynamics characteristics of planar superimposed vortices of exciton polariton condensates. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(23): 230303. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200697
[6]	Xu Xin, Jin Xue-Ying, Gao Hao-Ran, Cheng Jie, Lu Yang, Chen Dong, Yu Lian-Dong. Analysis of frequency tuning process of dual coupled optical microcavities. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(18): 184207. doi: 10.7498/aps.69.20200530
[7]	Ren Jin-Lian, Ren Heng-Fei, Lu Wei-Gang, Jiang Tao. Simulation of two-dimensional nonlinear problem with solitary wave based on split-step finite pointset method. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(14): 140203. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20190340
[8]	Wen Lin, Liang Yi, Zhou Jing, Yu Peng, Xia Lei, Niu Lian-Bin, Zhang Xiao-Fei. Effects of linear Zeeman splitting on the dynamics of bright solitons in spin-orbit coupled Bose-Einstein condensates. Acta Physica Sinica, 2019, 68(8): 080301. doi: 10.7498/aps.68.20182013
[9]	Zhang Jie-Fang, Dai Chao-Qing. Control of nonautonomous matter rogue waves. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(5): 050501. doi: 10.7498/aps.65.050501
[10]	Dang Ting-Ting, Wang Juan-Fen, An Ya-Dong, Liu Xiang-Lian, Zhang Zhao-Xia, Yang Ling-Zhen. Transmission and control of bright solitons in parity-time symmetric waveguide. Acta Physica Sinica, 2015, 64(6): 064211. doi: 10.7498/aps.64.064211
[11]	Xu Yuan-Fen. Exact traveling wave solutions for simplified model of Gross-Pitaevskii equation in the 1D-Tonks-Girardeau gas. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(10): 100202. doi: 10.7498/aps.62.100202
[12]	He Zhang-Ming, Wang Deng-Long, Ding Jian-Wen, Yan Xiao-Hong. Oscillation-localization transition behavior of bright-bright solitons in two species Bose-Einstein condensates. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(23): 230508. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.230508
[13]	Zong Feng-De, Yang Yang, Zhang Jie-Fang. Evolution and controlled manipulation of a Bose-Einstein condensate chirped soliton in external potentials. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(6): 3670-3678. doi: 10.7498/aps.58.3670
[14]	Zong Feng-De, Zhang Jie-Fang. N-soliton interactions of Bose-Einstein condensates in external potentials. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(5): 2658-2668. doi: 10.7498/aps.57.2658
[15]	He Zhang-Ming, Wang Deng-Long. Evolvement between bright and dark soliton of condensates. Acta Physica Sinica, 2007, 56(6): 3088-3091. doi: 10.7498/aps.56.3088
[16]	Xu Zhi-Jun, Shi Jian-Qing, Li Zhen, Cai Ping-Gen. Solution of the ground state wave function of Bose-condensed gas in a harmonic trap based on the Gross-Pitaevskii function. Acta Physica Sinica, 2006, 55(7): 3265-3271. doi: 10.7498/aps.55.3265
[17]	Jiang De-Sheng, She Wei-Long. Coherent collisions of multi photovoltaic bright spatial solitons. Acta Physica Sinica, 2005, 54(5): 2090-2095. doi: 10.7498/aps.54.2090
[18]	Quyang Shi-Gen, She Wei-Long. Dark-bright photovoltaic soliton pair with two-wavelength components. Acta Physica Sinica, 2004, 53(9): 3042-3048. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.3042
[19]	Jiang De-Sheng, Ouyang Shi-Gen, She Wei-Long. Interaction of photovotaic spatial solitons between dark and dark as well as dark and bright. Acta Physica Sinica, 2004, 53(11): 3777-3785. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.3777
[20]	Li Xiang－Zheng, Zhang Jin－Liang, Wang Yue－Ming, Wang Ming－Liang. Envelope solutions to nonlinear Schr?dinger equation. Acta Physica Sinica, 2004, 53(12): 4045-4051. doi: 10.7498/aps.53.4045

Catalog

Vol. 72, Issue 10 - 2023-05-20

Metrics

Abstract views: 1791
PDF Downloads: 90
Cited By: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Search

Article

留言板