-
In this work, the molecular structure and energy of some critical points in nonradiative relaxation process of the excited state of pentafluoropyridine are studied through quantum chemistry calculation. The structures and the vertical excitation energies and adiabatic excitation energies of the ground state and two lowest exited states are calculated. The geometry of the ground state is a planar structure with C2v symmetry, while the geometries of the two lowest excited states are half-boat structures with out-of-plane distortions. Furthermore, the topology structures and energy of the conical intersections of S2/S1, S1/S0 and S2/S0 are determined. The topology structures of the conical intersections S2/S1, S1/S0 and S2/S0 in the branching space are all peaked with asymmetric structures, and are determined to be structure of boat, half-boat, and chair, respectively. Their corresponding energy values are estimated at 6.39, 5.16 and 8.51 eV, respectively. The results show that the primary non-adiabatic relaxation pathway is the wavepacket of the S2 state rapidly evolving into the S1 state via the S2/S1, and then directly relaxing to the ground state via the S1/S0. In addition, the probability of directly relaxing to the ground state through S2/S0 is smaller.
-
Keywords:
- quantum chemical calculations /
- conical intersection /
- excited states /
- structure evolution
[1] Lim J S, Kim S K 2010 Nat. Chem. 2 627
Google Scholar
[2] Adachi S, Suzuki T 2020 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22 2814
Google Scholar
[3] Woo K C, Kang D H, Kim S K 2017 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 17152
Google Scholar
[4] Anand N, Isukapalli S V K, Vennapusa S R 2020 J. Comput. Chem. 41 1068
Google Scholar
[5] Zgrablic G, Novello A M, Parmigiani F 2012 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 955
Google Scholar
[6] Lee H, Kim S Y, Kim S K 2020 Chem. Sci. 11 6856
Google Scholar
[7] Adachi S, Schatteburg T, Humeniuk A, Mitric R, Suzuki T 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 13902
Google Scholar
[8] Chang K F, Reduzzi M, Wang H, Poullain S M, Kobayashi Y, Barreau L, Prendergast D, Neumark D M 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 4042
Google Scholar
[9] Pracht P, Bannwarth C 2022 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18 6370
Google Scholar
[10] Benda Z, Jagau T C 2018 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 14 4216
Google Scholar
[11] De Sio A, Sommer E, Nguyen X T, Gross L, Popovic D, Nebgen B T, Fernandez-Alberti S, Pittalis S, Rozzi C A, Molinari E, Mena-Osteritz E, Bauerle P, Frauenheim T, Tretiak S, Lienau C 2021 Nat. Nanotechnol. 16 63
Google Scholar
[12] Bhebhe M N, De Eulate E A, Pei Y, Arrigan D W, Roth P J, Lowe A B 2017 Macromol. Rapid Comm. 38 1600450
Google Scholar
[13] Corley C A, Kobra K, Peloquin A J, Salmon K, Gumireddy L, Knoerzer T A, McMillen C D, Pennington W T, Schoffstall A M, Iacono S T 2019 J. Fluorine Chem. 228 109409
Google Scholar
[14] Houck M B, Fuhrer T J, Phelps C R, Brown L C, Iacono S T 2021 Macromolecules 54 5586
Google Scholar
[15] Iacono S T, Budy S M, Jin J, Smith D W 2007 J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Chem. 45 5705
Google Scholar
[16] Moore L M J, Greeson K T, Stewart K A, Kure D A, Corley C A, Jennings A R, Iacono S T, Ghiassi K B 2020 Macromol. Chem. Phys. 221 2000100
Google Scholar
[17] Seyb C, Kerres J 2013 Eur. Polym. J. 49 518
Google Scholar
[18] Miller W K, Samuel B, Roe A 1950 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 72 1629
Google Scholar
[19] Fuhrer T J, Houck M, Iacono S T 2021 ACS Omega. 48 32607
Google Scholar
[20] Hüter O, Sala M, Neumann H, Zhang S, Studzinski H, Egorova D, Temps F 2016 J. Chem. Phys. 145 014302
Google Scholar
[21] Studzinski H, Zhang S, Wang Y, Temps F 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 128 164314
Google Scholar
[22] Kus J A, Hüter O, Temps F 2017 J. Chem. Phys. 147 013938
Google Scholar
[23] Frisch M J, Trucks G W, Schlegel H B, et al. 2009 Gaussian Inc, Revision B.01, Wallingford CT
[24] Werner H J, Knowles P J, Knizia G, et al. 2010 MOLPRO
[25] Neese F 2022 Wires Comput. 12 1606
Google Scholar
[26] Dennington R, Keith T A, Millam J M 2016 Semichem Inc. Shawnee Mission, KS, GaussView, Version 6
[27] Lu T, Chen F 2012 J. Comput. Chem. 33 580
Google Scholar
[28] Schaftenaar G, Noordik J H 2000 J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des. 14 123
Google Scholar
[29] Varras P C, Gritzapis P S, Fylaktakidou K C 2017 Mol. Phys. 116 154
Google Scholar
[30] Nagaoka S I, Nagashima U 1990 J. Chem. Phys. 94 4467
Google Scholar
[31] Chachisvilis M, Zewail A H 1999 J. Phys. Chem. A 103 7408
Google Scholar
[32] Cox J M, Bain M, Kellogg M, Bradforth S E, Lopez S A 2021 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 7002
Google Scholar
[33] Galvan I F, Delcey M G, Pedersen T B, Aquilante F, Lindh R 2016 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 12 3636
Google Scholar
[34] Boeije Y, Olivucci M 2023 Chem. Soc. Rev. 52 2643
Google Scholar
[35] Paulami G, Arpita G, Debshree G 2021 J. Phys. Chem. A 125 5556
Google Scholar
[36] Barbatti M, Aquino J A A, Lischka H 2005 J. Phys. Chem. A 109 5168
Google Scholar
[37] Li D, Zhang S 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 083103
Google Scholar
[38] Suzuki T 2012 Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 31 265
Google Scholar
[39] Palmer I J, Ragazos I N, Bernardi F, Olivucci M, Robb M A 1993 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115 673
Google Scholar
[40] Suzuki Y, Horio T, Fuji T, Suzuki T 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 134 184313
Google Scholar
[41] Radloff W, Stert V, Freudenberg T, Hertel I V, Jouvet C, Dedonder-Lardeux C, Solgadi D 1997 Chem. Phys. Lett. 281 20
Google Scholar
[42] Radloff W, Freudenberg T, Ritze H H, Stert V, Noack F, Hertel I V 1996 Chem. Phys. Lett. 261 301
Google Scholar
[43] Enomoto K, LaVerne J A, Seki S, Tagawa S 2006 J. Phys. Chem. A 110 9874
Google Scholar
-
图 1 (a)五氟吡啶分子的结构和对应的原子序数; (b)—(d) 利用B3LYP, M062X和SA-CASSCF(8, 8)方法下获得的S0态的几何结构
Figure 1. (a) Molecular structures and corresponding atomic numbers of pentafluoropyridine; (b)–(d) geometric structure of the S0 state was calculated under B3LYP, M062X and SA-CASSCF(8, 8) methods.
图 2 利用B3LYP, M062X和SA-CASSCF(8, 8)方法优化得到S1态(上图)和S2(下图)的几何结构
Figure 2. Geometric structures of the S1 (upper) and S2 (lower) states were calculated under B3LYP, M062X and SA-CASSCF(8, 8) methods.
图 3 利用B3LYP和M062X方法计算得到的五氟吡啶分子吸收光谱
Figure 3. Absorption spectra of pentafluoropyridine by B3LYP and M062X levels.
图 4 SA-CASSCF水平下的锥形交叉的结构 (a) S2/S1; (b) S1/S0; (c) S2/S0
Figure 4. Structures of conical intersections under the SA-CASSCF level: (a) S2/S1; (b) S1/S0; (c) S2/S0.
图 5 分支空间中锥形交叉的拓扑结构 (a) S2/S1; (b) S1/S0; (c) S2/S0. 能量单位: eV; x和y单位: Å
Figure 5. Topological structure of conical crossover in bifurcation space: (a) S2/S1; (b) S1/S0; (c) S2/S0 in the branching space. Energy in eV; x and y in Å.
图 6 五氟吡啶分子的非辐射弛豫动力学
Figure 6. Nonradiative relaxation dynamics of pentafluoropyridine.
表 1 利用B3LYP, M062X, SA-CASSCF(8, 8)方法, 得到五氟吡啶分子的S1态和S2态的结构参数(键长单位Å, 二面角单位(°))
Table 1. Structural parameters of the S1 and S2 states were obtained by B3LYP, M062X and SA-CASSCF(8, 8) methods, respectively (Bond length and dihedral angle are Å, (°) in units, respectively).
结构参数 S1 S2 B3LYP/
6-311G*M062X/
6-311G*SA-CASSCF/
6-311G*B3LYP/
6-311G*M062X/
6-311G*SA-CASSCF/
6-311G*C1—F1 1.32 1.31 1.31 1.34 1.31 1.29 C2—F2 1.34 1.33 1.33 1.34 1.33 1.33 C3—F3 1.41 1.37 1.37 1.39 1.37 1.29 C4—F4 1.34 1.33 1.33 1.34 1.33 1.32 C5—F5 1.32 1.31 1.31 1.34 1.31 1.30 C1—N 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.33 1.32 1.44 C5—N 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.33 1.32 1.36 C1—C2 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.38 1.43 1.35 C2—C3 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.44 1.40 1.43 C3—C4 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.44 1.40 1.47 C4—C5 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.38 1.43 1.34 C1—C5 2.20 2.18 2.21 2.29 2.18 2.36 C2—C4 2.28 2.28 2.36 2.45 2.28 2.52 N—C1—C2—C5 3.83 5.31 1.13 3.07 5.42 20.69 C3—C2—C1—C4 13.26 13.33 0.30 16.25 13.16 20.64 F3—C3—C4—C1 54.38 52.09 45.11 75.49 51.89 55.04 F4—C4—C5—C1 13.68 14.05 3.13 12.19 14.58 32.02 F5—C5—C4—C2 6.96 9.10 2.96 7.32 9.66 18.20 
DownLoad: CSV
表 2 B3LYP, SA-CASSCF(8, 8), M062X和CASPT2方法结合6-311G*基组计算得到五氟吡啶分子S1态和S2态的VEEs和AEEs (单位为eV)
Table 2. VEEs and AEEs (in eV) of pentafluoropyridine in the S1 and S2 states calculated at B3LYP, SA-CASSCF(8, 8), M062X and CASPT2 levels with the 6-311G* basis set.
Methods S1 S2 VEEs Dev/% AEEs Dev/% VEEs AEEs Exp.a) 4.88 — 4.60 — — — RI-SCS-CC2a) 5.10 4.5 4.60 0 6.35 — XMCQDPT2a) 4.89 0.2 4.41 4.1 6.23 5.26 B3LYP 5.33 9.2 4.41 4.1 6.28 5.26 SA-CASSCF(8, 8) 5.47 12.1 4.84 5.2 6.92 6.69 M062X 5.63 9.8 4.80 4.3 6.50 6.15b) CASPT2 5.02 2.9 4.41 4.1 6.33 — 注: a) 来自参考文献[22]; b) 基于M062X/6-31G*的结果
DownLoad: CSV
表 3 SA-CASSCF水平下的锥形交叉的结构参数(键长单位Å, 二面角单位 (°))
Table 3. Structural parameters of conical intersections were obtained by SA-CASSCF(8, 8) methods (Bond length and dihedral angle are Å, (°) in units).
参数 S2/S1 S1/S0 S2/S0 C1—F1 1.30 1.30 1.31 C2—F2 1.32 1.31 1.30 C3—F3 1.30 1.32 1.32 C4—F4 1.32 1.31 1.30 C5—F5 1.30 1.30 1.31 C1—N 1.45 1.31 1.48 C5—N 1.29 1.33 1.42 C1—C2 1.47 1.46 1.49 C2—C3 1.39 1.46 1.48 C3—C4 1.49 1.47 1.47 C4—C5 1.45 1.45 1.49 N—C1—C2—C5 29.72 2.15 22.59 C3—C2—C1—C4 10.90 46.24 12.28 F3—C3—C4—C1 11.57 36.30 64.87 F4—C4—C5—C1 9.84 30.71 0.81
DownLoad: CSV
表 4 锥形交叉在分支空间中的拓扑参数
Table 4. Topological parameters of conical intersections in branching space.
参数 S1/S0 S2/S1 S2/S0 σx/(eV·Å–1) –0.0047 0.1413 0.4016 σy/(eV·Å–1) –0.0207 0.0757 –0.0001 ${\varDelta }_{\mathrm{gh}} $ –0.9904 –0.9796 –0.8647 dgh 1.5000 1.0212 0.6159
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] Lim J S, Kim S K 2010 Nat. Chem. 2 627
Google Scholar
[2] Adachi S, Suzuki T 2020 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22 2814
Google Scholar
[3] Woo K C, Kang D H, Kim S K 2017 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 17152
Google Scholar
[4] Anand N, Isukapalli S V K, Vennapusa S R 2020 J. Comput. Chem. 41 1068
Google Scholar
[5] Zgrablic G, Novello A M, Parmigiani F 2012 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 955
Google Scholar
[6] Lee H, Kim S Y, Kim S K 2020 Chem. Sci. 11 6856
Google Scholar
[7] Adachi S, Schatteburg T, Humeniuk A, Mitric R, Suzuki T 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 13902
Google Scholar
[8] Chang K F, Reduzzi M, Wang H, Poullain S M, Kobayashi Y, Barreau L, Prendergast D, Neumark D M 2020 Nat. Commun. 11 4042
Google Scholar
[9] Pracht P, Bannwarth C 2022 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18 6370
Google Scholar
[10] Benda Z, Jagau T C 2018 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 14 4216
Google Scholar
[11] De Sio A, Sommer E, Nguyen X T, Gross L, Popovic D, Nebgen B T, Fernandez-Alberti S, Pittalis S, Rozzi C A, Molinari E, Mena-Osteritz E, Bauerle P, Frauenheim T, Tretiak S, Lienau C 2021 Nat. Nanotechnol. 16 63
Google Scholar
[12] Bhebhe M N, De Eulate E A, Pei Y, Arrigan D W, Roth P J, Lowe A B 2017 Macromol. Rapid Comm. 38 1600450
Google Scholar
[13] Corley C A, Kobra K, Peloquin A J, Salmon K, Gumireddy L, Knoerzer T A, McMillen C D, Pennington W T, Schoffstall A M, Iacono S T 2019 J. Fluorine Chem. 228 109409
Google Scholar
[14] Houck M B, Fuhrer T J, Phelps C R, Brown L C, Iacono S T 2021 Macromolecules 54 5586
Google Scholar
[15] Iacono S T, Budy S M, Jin J, Smith D W 2007 J. Polym. Sci. Pol. Chem. 45 5705
Google Scholar
[16] Moore L M J, Greeson K T, Stewart K A, Kure D A, Corley C A, Jennings A R, Iacono S T, Ghiassi K B 2020 Macromol. Chem. Phys. 221 2000100
Google Scholar
[17] Seyb C, Kerres J 2013 Eur. Polym. J. 49 518
Google Scholar
[18] Miller W K, Samuel B, Roe A 1950 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 72 1629
Google Scholar
[19] Fuhrer T J, Houck M, Iacono S T 2021 ACS Omega. 48 32607
Google Scholar
[20] Hüter O, Sala M, Neumann H, Zhang S, Studzinski H, Egorova D, Temps F 2016 J. Chem. Phys. 145 014302
Google Scholar
[21] Studzinski H, Zhang S, Wang Y, Temps F 2008 J. Chem. Phys. 128 164314
Google Scholar
[22] Kus J A, Hüter O, Temps F 2017 J. Chem. Phys. 147 013938
Google Scholar
[23] Frisch M J, Trucks G W, Schlegel H B, et al. 2009 Gaussian Inc, Revision B.01, Wallingford CT
[24] Werner H J, Knowles P J, Knizia G, et al. 2010 MOLPRO
[25] Neese F 2022 Wires Comput. 12 1606
Google Scholar
[26] Dennington R, Keith T A, Millam J M 2016 Semichem Inc. Shawnee Mission, KS, GaussView, Version 6
[27] Lu T, Chen F 2012 J. Comput. Chem. 33 580
Google Scholar
[28] Schaftenaar G, Noordik J H 2000 J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des. 14 123
Google Scholar
[29] Varras P C, Gritzapis P S, Fylaktakidou K C 2017 Mol. Phys. 116 154
Google Scholar
[30] Nagaoka S I, Nagashima U 1990 J. Chem. Phys. 94 4467
Google Scholar
[31] Chachisvilis M, Zewail A H 1999 J. Phys. Chem. A 103 7408
Google Scholar
[32] Cox J M, Bain M, Kellogg M, Bradforth S E, Lopez S A 2021 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 7002
Google Scholar
[33] Galvan I F, Delcey M G, Pedersen T B, Aquilante F, Lindh R 2016 J. Chem. Theory Comput. 12 3636
Google Scholar
[34] Boeije Y, Olivucci M 2023 Chem. Soc. Rev. 52 2643
Google Scholar
[35] Paulami G, Arpita G, Debshree G 2021 J. Phys. Chem. A 125 5556
Google Scholar
[36] Barbatti M, Aquino J A A, Lischka H 2005 J. Phys. Chem. A 109 5168
Google Scholar
[37] Li D, Zhang S 2022 Chin. Phys. B 31 083103
Google Scholar
[38] Suzuki T 2012 Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 31 265
Google Scholar
[39] Palmer I J, Ragazos I N, Bernardi F, Olivucci M, Robb M A 1993 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115 673
Google Scholar
[40] Suzuki Y, Horio T, Fuji T, Suzuki T 2011 J. Chem. Phys. 134 184313
Google Scholar
[41] Radloff W, Stert V, Freudenberg T, Hertel I V, Jouvet C, Dedonder-Lardeux C, Solgadi D 1997 Chem. Phys. Lett. 281 20
Google Scholar
[42] Radloff W, Freudenberg T, Ritze H H, Stert V, Noack F, Hertel I V 1996 Chem. Phys. Lett. 261 301
Google Scholar
[43] Enomoto K, LaVerne J A, Seki S, Tagawa S 2006 J. Phys. Chem. A 110 9874
Google Scholar
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 684
- PDF Downloads: 29
- Cited By: 0
