-
Solar cell is an important energy source for spacecraft. It is significant to study its resistance to space particle irradiation. In the past ten years, the research hotspot of solar cells has focused on the perovskite solar cells (PSCs) because of their advantages of long carrier lifetime, high light absorption performance, low cost and easy preparation. By now the photoelectric conversion efficiency of PSCs has reached to 25.5%. Recently, PSCs were found to be robust to space particle irradiation, which makes them possible to be used in the satellites and spacecraft. The antiradiation effects of perovskite solar cells with different cell structures and preparation processes have been studied, but the obtained experimental results are different. In this work, the experiments on radiations of protons, electrons and gamma rays of the same PSCs are carried out. The photoelectric characteristics before and after space particle irradiation are characterized, so as to analyze the radiation effect of PSCs. The experimental results show that the PSCs are sensitive to electron radiation and gamma radiation. With the increase of electron fluence and gamma total dose, the degradation of photoelectric characteristics of PSCs intensifies gradually. For gamma radiation, PSCs exhibit the most significantly radiation sensitivity. The PSCs are found to be robust to the proton irradiation. With the increase of proton fluence, the short-circuit currents of PSCs change little, the open-circuit voltages remain essentially unchanged, and the cell efficiency can be stably maintained at 94% of the pre-irradiation performance. Based on the above experimental data, a semi-empirical formula is established, and the radiation damage law of PSCs can be predicted with less experimental data, which will support the space application of PSCs.
-
Keywords:
- perovskite solar cell /
- radiation experiments /
- proton /
- electron /
- gamma irradiation
[1] Yoon S J, Kuno M, Kamat P V 2017 ACS Energy Lett. 9 1507
[2] Morana M, Wegscheider M, Bonanni A, Kopidakis N, Shaheen S, Scharber M, Zhu Z, Waller D, Gaudiana R, Brabec C 2008 Adv. Funct. Mater. 18 1757
Google Scholar
[3] Barnham K W J, Mazzer M, Clive B 2006 Nat. Mater. 5 161
Google Scholar
[4] Green M A 2001 Prog. Photovoltaics 9 123
Google Scholar
[5] 李燕, 贺红, 党威武, 陈雪莲, 孙璨, 郑嘉璐 2021 物理学报 70 098402
Google Scholar
Li Y, He H, Dang W W, Chen X L, Sun C, Zheng J L 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 098402
Google Scholar
[6] Kojima A, Teshima K, Shirai Y, Shirai Y, Miyasaka T 2009 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 6052
Google Scholar
[7] Green M A, Emery K A, Hishikawa Y, Warta W, Dunlop E D 2014 Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 23 1
[8] Jasenek A, Rau U, Weinert K, Kötschau I M, Hanna G, Voorwinden G, Powalla M, Schock H W, Werner J H 2001 Thin Solid Films 387 228
Google Scholar
[9] 李澄举 1997 微波与卫星通信 3 00470
Li C J 1997 Microw. Satell. Commun. 3 00470
[10] Bourgoin J C, Angelis N D 2001 Sol. Energ. Mater. Sol. C. 66 467
Google Scholar
[11] 李彦朋 2010 博士学位论文 (哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学)
Li Y P 2010 Ph. D. Dissertation (Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology) (in Chinese)
[12] Wang J 2016 M. S. Dissertation (Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology) (in Chinese)
[13] Grancini G, Roldan-Carmona C, Zimmermann I, Mosconi E, Lee X, Martineau D, Narbey S, Oswald F, De Angelis F, Graetzel M, Nazeeruddin M K 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 15684
Google Scholar
[14] Meng L, You J, Yang Y 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 5265
Google Scholar
[15] Bryant D, Aristidou N, Pont S, Sanchez-Molina I, Chotchunangatchaval T, Wheeler S, Durrant J R, Haque S A 2016 Energy Environ. Sci. 9 1655
Google Scholar
[16] Lang F, Nickel N H, Bundesmann J, Seidel S, Denker A, Albrecht S, Brus V V, Rappich J, Rech B, Landi G, Neitzert H C 2016 Adv. Mater. 28 8726
Google Scholar
[17] Durant B K, Afshari H, Singh S, Rout B, Eperon G E, Sellers I R 2021 ACS Energy Lett. 6-7 2362
[18] Lang F, Jošt M, Frohna K, Köhnen E, Al-Ashouri A, Bowman A R, Bertram T, Morales-Vilches A B, Koushik D, Tennyson E M, Galkowski K, Landi G, Creatore M, Stannowski B, Kaufmann C A, Bundesmann J, Rappich J, Rech B, Denker A, Albrecht S, Neitzert H C, Nickel N H, Stranks S D 2020 Joule 4 1054
Google Scholar
[19] Kanaya S, Kim G, Ikegami M, Miyasaka T, Hirose K 2019 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10 22
[20] Miyazawa Y, Ikegami M, Chen H W, Ohshima T, Imaizumi M, Hirose K, Miyasaka T 2018 iScience 2 148
Google Scholar
[21] Yang S, Xu Z Y, Xue S, Kandlakunta P, Cao L, Huang J S 2019 Adv. Mater. 31 1805547
Google Scholar
[22] Li P, Dong H, Lan J H, Bai Y R, He C H, Ma L Y, Li Y H, Liu J X 2022 Materials 15 4
[23] Shim H E, Park J, Yeon Y, Lee N, Gwon H J 2022 J. Korean Phys. Soc. 3 80
-
图 1 钙钛矿太阳能电池电子显微镜扫描截面示意图
Figure 1. Cross-sectional SEM image of perovskite solar cell.
图 2 太阳能电池J-V曲线相关的电性能参数
Figure 2. Parameters of electrical performance associated with J-V curves of solar cells.
图 3 钙钛矿太阳能电池样品稳定性测试
Figure 3. Stability test of perovskite solar cells.
图 4 钙钛矿太阳能电池J-V特性曲线随不同辐照条件的变化 (a) 质子辐照; (b) 电子辐照; (c) γ辐照
Figure 4. Variation of J-V characteristics of perovskite solar cells with different irradiation conditions: (a) Proton irradiation; (b) electron irradiation; (c) gamma irradiation.
图 5 钙钛矿太阳能电池短路电流随不同辐照条件的变化 (a)质子辐照; (b)电子辐照; (c) γ辐照
Figure 5. Variation of JSC characteristics of perovskite solar cells with different irradiation conditions: (a) Proton irradiation; (b) electron irradiation; (c) gamma irradiation.
图 6 钙钛矿太阳能电池转化效率随不同辐照条件的变化 (a)质子辐照; (b)电子辐照; (c) γ辐照
Figure 6. Variation of PCE characteristics of perovskite solar cells with different irradiation conditions: (a) Proton irradiation; (b) electron irradiation; (c) gamma irradiation.
图 7 不同辐照条件下钙钛矿太阳能电池电学特性退化随辐照注量的变化 (a)短路电流; (b)开路电压; (c)光电转化效率
Figure 7. Degradation of PSCs under different irradiation conditions varies with the radiation fluence: (a) JSC; (b) VOC; (c) PCE
表 1 不同辐射环境下钙钛矿太阳能电池各敏感参数半经验公式的拟合系数
Table 1. Fitting coefficients of semi empirical formulas for sensitive parameters of perovskite solar cells under different radiation environments.
质子辐照 电子辐照 γ辐照 VOC C = 0.041,
$ \varphi_x $ = 5.55×1014C = 0.015,
$\varphi_x$ = 2.81×1013C = 0.001,
$\varphi_x$ = 2.95×109JSC C = 0.052,
$\varphi_x$ = 5.67×1013C = 0.048,
$\varphi_x$ = 6.35×1011C = 0.013,
$\varphi_x$ = 3.81×1010Pmax C = 0.086,
$\varphi_x$ = 9.66×1013C = 0.091,
$\varphi_x$ = 1.65×1012C = 0.007,
$\varphi_x$ = 4.63×107
DownLoad: CSV
-
[1] Yoon S J, Kuno M, Kamat P V 2017 ACS Energy Lett. 9 1507
[2] Morana M, Wegscheider M, Bonanni A, Kopidakis N, Shaheen S, Scharber M, Zhu Z, Waller D, Gaudiana R, Brabec C 2008 Adv. Funct. Mater. 18 1757
Google Scholar
[3] Barnham K W J, Mazzer M, Clive B 2006 Nat. Mater. 5 161
Google Scholar
[4] Green M A 2001 Prog. Photovoltaics 9 123
Google Scholar
[5] 李燕, 贺红, 党威武, 陈雪莲, 孙璨, 郑嘉璐 2021 物理学报 70 098402
Google Scholar
Li Y, He H, Dang W W, Chen X L, Sun C, Zheng J L 2021 Acta Phys. Sin. 70 098402
Google Scholar
[6] Kojima A, Teshima K, Shirai Y, Shirai Y, Miyasaka T 2009 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 6052
Google Scholar
[7] Green M A, Emery K A, Hishikawa Y, Warta W, Dunlop E D 2014 Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 23 1
[8] Jasenek A, Rau U, Weinert K, Kötschau I M, Hanna G, Voorwinden G, Powalla M, Schock H W, Werner J H 2001 Thin Solid Films 387 228
Google Scholar
[9] 李澄举 1997 微波与卫星通信 3 00470
Li C J 1997 Microw. Satell. Commun. 3 00470
[10] Bourgoin J C, Angelis N D 2001 Sol. Energ. Mater. Sol. C. 66 467
Google Scholar
[11] 李彦朋 2010 博士学位论文 (哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学)
Li Y P 2010 Ph. D. Dissertation (Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology) (in Chinese)
[12] Wang J 2016 M. S. Dissertation (Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology) (in Chinese)
[13] Grancini G, Roldan-Carmona C, Zimmermann I, Mosconi E, Lee X, Martineau D, Narbey S, Oswald F, De Angelis F, Graetzel M, Nazeeruddin M K 2017 Nat. Commun. 8 15684
Google Scholar
[14] Meng L, You J, Yang Y 2018 Nat. Commun. 9 5265
Google Scholar
[15] Bryant D, Aristidou N, Pont S, Sanchez-Molina I, Chotchunangatchaval T, Wheeler S, Durrant J R, Haque S A 2016 Energy Environ. Sci. 9 1655
Google Scholar
[16] Lang F, Nickel N H, Bundesmann J, Seidel S, Denker A, Albrecht S, Brus V V, Rappich J, Rech B, Landi G, Neitzert H C 2016 Adv. Mater. 28 8726
Google Scholar
[17] Durant B K, Afshari H, Singh S, Rout B, Eperon G E, Sellers I R 2021 ACS Energy Lett. 6-7 2362
[18] Lang F, Jošt M, Frohna K, Köhnen E, Al-Ashouri A, Bowman A R, Bertram T, Morales-Vilches A B, Koushik D, Tennyson E M, Galkowski K, Landi G, Creatore M, Stannowski B, Kaufmann C A, Bundesmann J, Rappich J, Rech B, Denker A, Albrecht S, Neitzert H C, Nickel N H, Stranks S D 2020 Joule 4 1054
Google Scholar
[19] Kanaya S, Kim G, Ikegami M, Miyasaka T, Hirose K 2019 J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10 22
[20] Miyazawa Y, Ikegami M, Chen H W, Ohshima T, Imaizumi M, Hirose K, Miyasaka T 2018 iScience 2 148
Google Scholar
[21] Yang S, Xu Z Y, Xue S, Kandlakunta P, Cao L, Huang J S 2019 Adv. Mater. 31 1805547
Google Scholar
[22] Li P, Dong H, Lan J H, Bai Y R, He C H, Ma L Y, Li Y H, Liu J X 2022 Materials 15 4
[23] Shim H E, Park J, Yeon Y, Lee N, Gwon H J 2022 J. Korean Phys. Soc. 3 80
DownLoad:
Catalog
Metrics
- Abstract views: 3062
- PDF Downloads: 146
- Cited By: 0
